Comparative Analysis of Photosynthetic Physiological Responses  of Different Gooseberry Varieties to Salt Stress

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.05.006

Abstract

Abstract: 【Objective】 To study photosynthetic and physiological responses of three varieties of gooseberry: Zhuiyu, Caihong and Hongdenglong to salt stress. 【Methods】 The NaCl concentrations of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% and 5 photosynthetic indexes and 8 physiological indexes of 3 varieties under CK(0.259%) treatment were determined by 2-year cutting seedlings. The effects of different concentrations NaCl stress on photosynthetic indexes and physiological indexes of chestnut leaves were studied, and the NaCl tolerance was evaluated by significance analysis, multiple comparison and membership function. 【Results】 (1)The photosynthetic rate (Pn) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the various varieties of gooseberry leaves showed an overall upward trend, while the transpiration rate (Tr), stoma conductance (Gs), and CO₂ concentration (Ci) showed general trend of increasing first and then decreasing. (2) The soluble sugar and proline content of Hongdenglong showed an upward trend, and both Zhuiyu and Caihong showed a rising trend and then a decreasing trend. The electrical conductivity and malondialdehyde content of the three varieties showed a decreasing trend. Chlorophyll of Caihong and Hongdenglong showed an upward trend, and Zhuiyu showed a downward trend followed by an upward trend. The SOD and POD of Caihong and Hongdenglong increased first and then decreased, and Zhuiyu declined. The CAT of Zhuiyu and Hongdenglong were generally on the rise, and the CAT of Caihong rose first and then fell down. 【Conclusion】 Caihong and Hongdenglong have strong salt tolerance.

Key words: gooseberry; salt stress; photosynthetic parameters; physiological indexes; membership function

摘要： 【目的】研究不同浓度NaCl胁迫下醋栗叶片的光合指标及生理指标的影响差异。【方法】选用3个醋栗品种坠玉、彩虹和红灯笼,选取2年生扦插苗,测定NaCl浓度0.2%、0.4%、0.6%及CK(0.259%)处理下,3个品种的5个光合指标及8个生理指标。运用显著性分析、多重比较及隶属函数对其耐NaCl性比较综合评定。【结果】(1)各品种醋栗叶片的光合参数中光合速率(Pn)、水分利用率(WUE)总体呈上升趋势,蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)和胞间CO₂浓度(Ci)总体呈先升后降趋势。(2)红灯笼的可溶性糖和脯氨酸含量呈上升趋势,坠玉和彩虹都呈先升后降趋势。3个品种的电导率和丙二醛含量呈下降趋势。彩虹和红灯笼的叶绿素呈上升趋势,坠玉呈先降后升趋势。彩虹和红灯笼的SOD和POD均呈先升后降趋势,坠玉呈下降趋势。坠玉和红灯笼的CAT总体呈上升趋势,彩虹的CAT呈现先升后降趋势。【结论】彩虹和红灯笼耐NaCl能力均较强。

关键词: 醋栗, NaCl胁迫, 光合参数, 生理指标, 隶属函数

CLC Number:

S664.2

SUN Yali, CHU Fenfei, Gulimirei Kakeshi, Baharguli Ayupu, Gulijiang Xukuerhan. Comparative Analysis of Photosynthetic Physiological Responses of Different Gooseberry Varieties to Salt Stress[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(5): 829-837.

孙雅丽, 褚奋飞, 故丽米热·卡克什, 巴哈尔古丽·阿尤甫, 古丽江·许库尔汗. 不同醋栗品种对NaCl胁迫的光合生理响应比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(5): 829-837.

References 24

[1]	李春晓,任家伟,孙美欧,等.俄罗斯醋栗生长情况调查研究[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2019,42(3):93-96.LI Chunxiao, REN Jiawei, SUN Meiou, et al. A Study on the Growth of Russian Gooseberry [J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design, 2019, 42(3):93-96.
[2]	胡华冉,刘浩,邓纲,等.不同盐碱胁迫对大麻种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2015,24(4):61-68.HU Huaran, LIU Hao, DENG Gang, et al. Effects of different salt-alkaline stresses on seedd germination and seeding growth of Cannabis sativa [J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2015,24(4):61-68.
[3]	张鹍.不同穗醋栗品种枝条抗寒性研究[J].中国果树,2018,(5):43-45.ZHANG Kun. Study on Cold Resistance of Branches of Different Currant Varieties [J]. China Fruits, 2018,(5):43-45.
[4]	古丽江·许库尔汗,孙雅丽,巴哈尔古丽·阿优甫,等.醋栗叶片对干旱胁迫的光合生理生化响应[J].南方农业学报,2019,50(7):1541-1549.Gulijiang Xukuerhan, SUN Yali, Bahaerguli Ayoufu, et al. Photosynthetic physiological and biochemical responses of gooseberry leaves to drought stress [J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2019, 50(7):1541-1549.
[5]	孙晶.醋栗品种坠玉在黑龙江绥棱引种表现[J].黑龙江农业科学, 2019,(3):86-87.SUN Jing. Introduction of Gooseberry Variety Zhuiyu in Suling of Heilongjiang [J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019,(3):86-87.
[6]	张海旺,王洪江,洪新,等.5个黑穗醋栗品种在辽宁朝阳引种试验研究[J].林业与生态科学,2019,34(2):147-151.ZHANG Haiwang, WANG Hongjiang, HONG Xin, et al. The study on introduction of 5 black currant varieties in Chaoyang of Liaoning province [J]. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2019, 34(2):147-151.
[7]	李春晓,任家伟,王国义,等.俄罗斯醋栗物候观测研究[J].林业勘察设计,2017,(4):46-47.LI Chunxiao, REN Jiawei, WANG Guoyi, et al. Study on Russian Gooseberry Phonological Observation [J]. Forest Industry Survey and Design, 2017,(4):46-47.
[8]	刘凤芝,刘斌,张武杰,等.黑穗醋栗新品种—丹江黑规范化栽培技术[J].中国林副特产,2017,(5):54-55.LIU Fengzhi, LIU Bin, ZHANG Wujie, et al. New black currant varieties—Danjiang Hei standardized cultivation technology [J]. Forest By-Product and Specialty in China, 2017,(5):54-55.
[9]	齐云,浅析黑穗醋栗的栽培与管理[J].山西林业科技,2017,46(3):62-64.QI Yun. Analysis on the cultivation and management of black currant [J]. Shanxi Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 46(3):62-64.
[10]	孟凡丽.黑穗醋栗倒催根育苗硏究[J].山西果树,2017,46(3):1-3.MENG Fanli. Study on Seedling of Inversion Production Root of Hard Shoot of Black Currant [J]. Shanxi Fruits, 2017, 46(3):1-3.
[11]	李春晓,任家伟,王国义,等.俄罗斯醋栗嫩枝扦插试验[J].林业科技,2017,42(1):15-17.LI Chunxiao, REN Jiawei, WANG Guoyi, et al. Study on Twig Cutting of Russian Hominem [J]. Forestry Science & Technology, 2017, 42(1):15-17.
[12]	杨鹤.醋栗优良品种“坠玉”硬技扦插育苗技术研究[J].吉林林业科技,2016,45(6):11-13.YANG He. The hard branch cutting nursery technical research of Ribes nigrum improved varieties “Zhuiyu” [J]. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 45(6):11-13.
[13]	刘正祥,张华新,杨升.NaCl胁迫对沙枣幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J].林业科学,2014,50(1):32-40.LIU Zhengxiang, ZHANG Huaxin, YANG Sheng, et al. Effects of Na Cl Stress on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Elaeagnus angustifolia Seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(1):32-40.
[14]	王雨,马立敏,周睿颖,等.盐胁迫对5个产地菘蓝幼苗光合特性及抗逆指标的影响[J],南京农业大学学报,2017,40(3):416-424.WANG Yu,MA Limin,ZHOU Ruiying, et al. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and indexes of adverse circumstances-resistance of Isatis [J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017, 40(3):416-424.
[15]	马梦茹,盐胁迫对黑果枸杞光合生理特性及生长的影响[D].西宁:青海大学硕士论文,2015.MA Mengru. Effects of Salt stress on photosynthetic Physiology and growth of Lycium ruthenicum Murray [D]. Xi'ning: Qinghai University, 2015.
[16]	顾亮,盐胁迫对蓝莓生长及生理特性的影响[D].烟台:烟台大学,2018.GU Liang. Effect of Salt Stress on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics in Blueberry [D]. Yantai:Yantai University, 2018.
[17]	肖雯,贾恢先,蒲陆梅.几种盐生植物抗盐生理指标的研究[J].西北植物学报,2000,20(5):818-825.XIAO Wen, JIA Huixian, PU Lumei. Studies on physiological index of some halophytes [J]. Northwest Journal of Botany, 2000, 20(5):818-825.
[18]	王学文,蔺彩虹,李小峰,等.NaHCO3胁迫对大叶紫花苜蓿生理特征的影响[J].草业科学,2007,24(2): 26-29.WANG Xuewen, LIN Caihong, LI Xiaofeng, et al. Effects of NaHCO3 stress on physiological characteristics of Medicago sativa [J].Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(2): 26-29.
[19]	陈刘平,陈巧艳,王紫娟,等.NaCl 胁迫对小麦苗期和灌浆期生理生化特性及产量性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(13):85-90.CHEN Liuping, CHEN Qiaoyan, WANG Zijuan, et al. Effects of NaCl Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics and Yield Traits of Wheat at Seedling and Grain Filling Stages [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(13):85-90.
[20]	姜瑛,周萌,吴越,等.不同燕麦品种耐盐性差异及其生理机制[J].草业科学,2018,35(12):2903-2914.JIANG Ying, ZHOU Meng, WU Yue, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance and its underlying physiological mechanisms in different oats[J]. Pratacultural Science , 2018,35(12):2903-2914.
[21]	许晓萱.NaCl胁迫对玉米幼苗生理及膜脂代谢影响的研究[D].大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学硕士论文,2019.XU Xiaoxuan. Effects of Physiological and Membrane Lipid Metabolism in Maize Seedlingsunder Na Cl Stress [D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2019.
[22]	焦德志,赵泽龙.盐碱胁迫对植物形态和生理生化影响及植物响应的研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(20):1-4.JIAO Dezhi, ZHAO Zelong. Effects of saline-alkali stress on plant morphology, physiology and biochemistry and plant response [J].Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2019, 47(20):1-4.
[23]	冯时,王纪忠,童瑶,等.盐胁迫对草莓苗形态指标和抗氧化系统酶活性的影响[J].现代农业科技,2019,(13):65-70.FENG Shi, WANG Jizhong, TONG Yao, et al. Effects of Salt Stress on Morphological Indexes and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Strawberry Seedlings [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019,(13):65-70.
[24]	王亚,杨俊芳,王宙,等.蓖麻种子萌发与幼苗生长对盐胁迫的生理响应[J].山西农业科学,2019,47(10):1705-1708.WANG Ya,YANG Junfang,WANG Zhou, et al. Physiological Response of Seed Germination and Seedlings Growth of Ricinus communis L. to Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(10):1705-1708.

Comparative Analysis of Photosynthetic Physiological Responses of Different Gooseberry Varieties to Salt Stress

不同醋栗品种对NaCl胁迫的光合生理响应比较分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	DONG Zhiduo, XU Fei, FU Qiuping, HUANG Jian, QI Tong, MENG Ajing, FU Yanbo, Kaisaier Kuerban. Effects of different types of salt and alkali stress on cotton seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844.
[2]	XI Rui, CHEN Yijia, LI Ning, YU Qinghui, WANG Qiang, QIN Yong. Effects of exogenous 2, 4-epibrassinolide on seed germination of different salt-sensitive tomatoes under salt stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1983-1992.
[3]	LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
[4]	WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao. Evaluation of drought resistance of different Kazakhstan spring wheat at seeding stage under PEG-6000 stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360.
[5]	Zaituniguli Kuerban, Tuerxun Tuerhong, Yisilayi Dawuti, WANG Hui, ZHOU Dawei. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer topdressing methods on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of sweet sorghum [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 326-335.
[6]	OU Yuan, LUO Shasha, WANG Ruyue, SUN Yali, HU Haifang. Effects of salt stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of american black walnut seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 393-401.
[7]	LIU Huifang, WANG Qiang, HAN Hongwei, ZHUANG Hongmei, WANG Hao, CHANG Yanan. Effects of salt, alkali and complex salt alkali stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activity of tomato seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2658-2666.
[8]	LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, SHU Sheng, MA Quanhui, HE Miao, DUAN Yifan, WU Hui. Comparative analysis of agronomic traits of different processing tomato varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2676-2683.
[9]	JU Le, QI Juncang, CHEN Peiyu, NIU Yinting, YIN Zhigang. Effects of drought stress on seed germination, seedling growth and physiological characteristics of barley [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1879-1886.
[10]	BAI Ling, FENG Guojun, HU Xiangwei, ZHAO Yun, SHI Shubing. Drought resistance identification and physiological changes of different millet varieties during germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1630-1640.
[11]	DONG Deyu, CHENG Yukun, WANG Rui, LEI Junjie, WANG Wei, CHEN Chuanxin, ZHENG Yongqiang, GENG Hongwei. Retrieval of wheat photosynthetic parameters at different growth stages based on UAV multispectral images [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1308-1318.
[12]	LAI Hanlin, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, YANG Hong, LI Yue, LEI Junjie, LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng. Effects of temperature and salt stress on seed germination characteristics of Descurainia sophia [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1326-1334.
[13]	WANG Xingzhou, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, GENG Hongwei, DING Sunlei, ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362.
[14]	TANG Xixi, Mubarek Ayup, XU Panyun, YU Qiuhong, GUO Chunmiao, ZHANG Ping, GONG Peng. Response of root anatomical structure of different rootstock resources of almond to drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 897-907.
[15]	LIU Min, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, GENG Wenjuan. Evaluation of cold resistance of three fresh edible jujube cultivars in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 916-924.