Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.06.007

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 1353-1362.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.06.007

• Germplasm Resources·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry·Soil Fertilizer·Molecular Genetics • Previous Articles Next Articles

Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties

WANG Xingzhou¹(), SHI Xiaolei², ZHANG Heng³, QU Kejia¹, GENG Hongwei¹, DING Sunlei², ZHANG Jinbo², YAN Yongliang²()

1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology/College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. International Cooperation and Exchange Office of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2022-10-20 Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-06-20
Correspondence author: YAN Yongliang(1982-), male, born in Wuwei, Gansu, associate researcher, Research area: crop genetics and breeding, (E-mail) yanliang198279@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31660389);The Innovation Ability Training Project for Young Sci-Tech Backbone Talents Sponsored by Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjnkq-2022005);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1403185)

引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价

王兴州¹(), 时晓磊², 张恒³, 曲可佳¹, 耿洪伟¹, 丁孙磊², 张金波², 严勇亮²()

1.新疆农业大学农学院/农业生物技术重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业科学院农作物品种资源研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆农业科学院国际科技合作交流处,乌鲁木齐 830091

通讯作者: 严勇亮(1982-),男,甘肃武威人,副研究员,研究方向为作物遗传育种,(E-mail) yanliang198279@163.com
作者简介:王兴州(1996-),男,河南新乡人,硕士研究生,研究方向为小麦抗逆性,(E-mail)1438895540@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31660389);新疆农业科学院青年科技骨干创新能力培养专项(xjnkq-2022005);国家自然科学基金(U1403185)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 The purpose of the current study is to explore the excellent germplasm resources of foreign introduced spring wheat varieties and screen out the varieties with strong salt tolerance in the of providing a preliminary foundation for the screening of salt tolerance identification indexes and breeding of salt tolerance varieties of wheat at germination stage. 【Methods】 77 spring wheat germplasm resources introduced from abroad were evaluated in laboratory under salt stress treated with 200 mmol/L NaCl solution. Ten traits such as longest root length, seedling height, root number, coleoptile, root fresh weight, seedling fresh weight, root dry weight and seedling dry weight were determined. The membership function, cluster analysis and factor analysis were used to evaluate the salt tolerance of wheat at germination stage.【Results】 10 traits were significantly different among 77 spring wheat germplasm resources. Under salt stress, the measured values of each index were significantly decreased compared with the photographic contrast, and the correlation analysis among each index showed positive relationships. It was found that the salt tolerance of different wheat varieties showed great difference by using membership function, and the D value varied from 0.08 to 0.77. 77 test materials could be divided into four categories according to salt tolerance. 17 wheat varieties including Chenglimara were salt tolerant, 36 wheat varieties including Seto were moderate salt tolerant, 16 wheat varieties including Kenya 178 Q8 were salt sensitive, and 8 wheat varieties including Sea Wari 48 were salt sensitive. The load of fresh weight and root number on biomass factor and root trait factor were 0.87 and 0.62, respectively. 【Conclusion】 The study has proven that the seedling fresh weight and root number can be used as reliable indexes to identify salt tolerance of wheat at germination stage.

Key words: spring wheat; salt stress; germination period

摘要：

【目的】挖掘国外引进春小麦品种中的优异种质资源,筛选出耐盐性较强的品种,为小麦萌发期耐盐性鉴定指标的筛选及耐盐性品种的选育提供参考。【方法】采用200 mmol/L NaCl溶液模拟盐胁迫环境,鉴定评价77份国外引进春小麦种质资源并进行室内萌发期耐盐性,测定最长根长、苗高、根数、胚芽鞘、根鲜重、苗鲜重、根干重、苗干重等10个性状指标,应用隶属函数、聚类分析、因子分析等方法综合评价小麦萌发期耐盐性。【结果】在盐胁迫下,10个性状在77份春小麦种质资源之间差异显著。盐胁迫下各指标测量值与对照相比较均明显下降,且各指标之间呈现极显著或显著正相关关系。不同小麦品种间的耐盐性表现出较大的差异,D值的变幅为0.08~0.77。77份材料按耐盐性强弱可分为4类,澄利马拉等17份小麦品种为耐盐型,濑户小麦等36份小麦品种为中度耐盐型,Kenya 178 Q8等16份小麦品种为盐敏感型,Sea Wari 48等8份小麦品种为盐高度敏感型。幼苗鲜重、根数在生物量因子和根部性状因子中的载荷量分别为0.87、0.62。【结论】幼苗鲜重以及根数可作为小麦萌发期耐盐性鉴定的可靠指标。

关键词: 春小麦, 盐胁迫, 萌发期

CLC Number:

S512

WANG Xingzhou, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, GENG Hongwei, DING Sunlei, ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362.

王兴州, 时晓磊, 张恒, 曲可佳, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. 引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362.

Figures/Tables 7

References 36

[1]	ZHU Jiankang. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants[J]. Cell, 2016, 167(2): 313-324. DOI PMID
[2]	刘艳丽, 许海霞, 刘桂珍, 等. 小麦耐盐性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008,(11):202-207.
	LIU Yanli, XU Haixia, LIU Guizhen, et al. Research progress on salt tolerance of wheat[J]. China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008,(11):202-207.
[3]	赵锁劳, 窦延玲. 小麦耐盐性鉴定指标及其分析评价[J]. 西北农业大学学报, 1998,(6):83-88.
	ZHAO Suolao, DOU Yanling. Identification and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Wheat[J]. Journal of Northwest Agricultural University, 1998,(6):83-88.
[4]	王志春, 梁正伟. 植物耐盐研究概况与展望[J]. 生态环境, 2003,(1):106-109.
	WANG Zhichun, LIANG Zhengwei. General situation and prospect of research on plant salt tolerance[J]. Ecological Environment, 2003,(1):106-109.
[5]	肖媛. 不同小麦品种种子萌发期耐盐性的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006,(22):5786-5787.
	XIAO Yuan. Study on Salt Tolerance of Different Wheat Varieties at Germination Stage[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006,(22):5786-5787.
[6]	李建国, 濮励杰, 朱明, 等. 土壤盐渍化研究现状及未来研究热点[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9):1233-1245.
	LI Jianguo, PU Lijie, ZHU Ming, et al. Current status and future research hotspots of soil salinization research[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(9):1233-1245.
[7]	Gkiougkis et al. Assessment of soil salinization at the eastern Nestos River delta, N.E. Greece[J]. Catena, 2015, (128): 238-251.
[8]	罗廷彬, 任崴, 谢春虹. 新疆盐碱地生物改良的必要性与可行性[J]. 干旱区研究, 2001,(1):46-48.
	LUO Tingbin, REN Wei, XIE Chunhong. Necessity and feasibility of biological improvement of saline-alkali land in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Area Research, 2001,(1):46-48.
[9]	赵广才, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 等. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018,(4):1-7.
	ZHAO Guangcai, CHANG Xuhong, WANG Demei, et al. General situation and development of wheat production[J]. Crop Journal, 2018,(4):1-7.
[10]	闫树平, 王光禄, 王怀恩, 等. 小麦种植效益提高途径探讨[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013,(4):68-69.
	YAN Shuping, WANG Guanglu, WANG Huaien, et al. Discussion on Ways to Improve Wheat Planting Benefit[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013,(4):68-69.
[11]	刘旭, 史娟, 张学勇, 等. 小麦耐盐种质的筛选鉴定和耐盐基因的标记[J]. 植物学报, 2001,(9):948-954.
	LIU Xu, SHI Juan, ZHANG Xueyong, et al. Screening and Identification of Salt Tolerant Germplasm in Wheat and Marking of Salt Tolerance Gene[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2001,(9):948-954.
[12]	王萌萌, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 等. 小麦品种资源耐盐性鉴定[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(2):189-194.
	WANG Mengmeng, JIANG Qiyan, HU Zheng, et al. Identification of salt tolerance of wheat variety resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2012, 13(2):189-194.
[13]	彭智, 李龙, 柳玉平, 等. 小麦芽期和苗期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(4):638-645.
	PENG Zhi, LI Long, LIU Yuping, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in wheat germination and seedling stages[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(4):638-645.
[14]	李媛媛, 陈博, 姚立蓉, 等. 283份小麦品种(系)萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3):25-33. DOI
	LI Yuanyuan, CHEN Bo, YAO Lirong, et al. Salinity and alkali tolerance evaluation and germplasm screening of 283 wheat varieties (lines) during germination[J]. China Agricultural Science and Technology Review, 2021, 23(3):25-33.
[15]	于崧, 张婷婷, 于立河, 等. 盐碱胁迫对小麦种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2019, 31(2):20-27.
	YU Song, ZHANG Tingting, YU Lihe, et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on germination characteristics of wheat seeds[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2019, 31(2):20-27.
[16]	李士磊, 霍鹏, 高欢欢, 等. 复合盐胁迫对小麦萌发的影响及耐盐阈值的筛选[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(2):260-264.
	LI Shilei, HUO Peng, GAO Huanhuan, et al. Effects of Compound Salt Stress on Wheat Germination and Screening of Salt Tolerance Threshold[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2012, 32(2):260-264.
[17]	孙永媛. 小麦耐盐生理及耐盐相关基因TaNHX3功能的初步研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2011.
	SUN Yongyuan. A preliminary study on salt tolerance physiology and the function of salt tolerance related gene TaNHX3 in wheat[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2011.
[18]	张巧凤, 陈宗金, 吴纪中, 等. 小麦种质芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013, 14(4):620-626.
	ZHANG Qiaofeng, CHEN Zongjin, WU Jizhong, et al. Salt tolerance identification and evaluation of wheat germplasm at bud and seedling stages[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2013, 14(4):620-626.
[19]	吕萌荔. 野生二粒小麦耐盐性鉴定及TtHKT1; 5基因克隆与生物信息学分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.
	LV Mengli. Salt tolerance identification and TtHKT1;5 gene cloning and bioinformatics analysis of wild emmer wheat[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2016.
[20]	许红, 刘杨, 王威雁, 等. 冬小麦种子萌发期抗旱性的基因型差异[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(10):1426-1432.
	XU Hong, LIU Yang, WANG Weiyan, et al. Genotypic differences in drought resistance of winter wheat seeds during germination[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2014, 34(10): 1426-1432.
[21]	马雅琴, 翁跃进. 引进春小麦种质耐盐性的鉴定评价[J]. 作物学报, 2005,(1):58-64.
	MA Yaqin, WENG Yuejin. Identification and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Introduced Spring Wheat Germplasm[J]. Chinese Journal of Crops, 2005,(1):58-64.
[22]	张鹏, 徐晨, 徐克章, 等. 大豆品种耐盐性的快速鉴定法及不同时期耐盐性的研究[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35(5):572-578.
	ZHANG Peng, XU Chen, XU Kezhang, et al. Rapid identification of salt tolerance of soybean varieties and study on salt tolerance in different periods[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crops, 2013, 35(5):572-578.
[23]	李鸿恩, 吴秀琴, 李宗智. 中国小麦种质资源主要品质鉴定[M]. 西安: 陕西科学技术出版社, 1992.
	LI Hongen, WU Xiuqin, LI Zongzhi. Identification of the main quality of wheat germplasm resources in China[M]. Xi'an: Shanxi Science and Technology Press, 1992.
[24]	李凤勤. 小麦萌发期耐盐碱相关性状关联分析及种质资源的筛选[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
	LI Fengqin. Correlation Analysis of Salt-Alkali Tolerance-Related Traits and Screening of Germplasm Resources in Wheat Germination Stage[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019.
[25]	朱建峰, 杨秀艳, 武海雯, 等. 植物种子萌发期耐盐碱性提高技术研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(2):158-168. DOI
	ZHU Jianfeng, YANG Xiuyan, WU Haiwen, et al. Research progress of technology for improving salinity and alkali tolerance of plant seeds during germination[J]. Bulletin of Biotechnology, 2020, 36(2):158-168.
[26]	王治江, 刘自刚, 孙万仓, 等. NaCl和Na₂SO₄胁迫对白菜型冬油菜种子萌发的影响及其耐盐性分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(6):243-252.
	WANG Zhijiang, LIU Zigang, SUN Wancang, et al. Effects of NaCl and Na₂SO₄ stress on seed germination and salt tolerance of Chinese cabbage winter rapeseed[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Regions, 2016, 34(6):243-252.
[27]	马树庆, 王琪, 陈凤涛, 等. 春旱背景下春玉米苗情对产量的影响及减产评估模式[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(S1):171-179.
	MA Shuqing, WANG Qi, CHEN Fengtao, et al. Effect of spring maize seedling condition on yield and yield reduction evaluation model under the background of spring drought[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(S1):171-179.
[28]	任利沙, 顾日良, 贾光耀, 等. 种子出苗率对玉米个体生长和群体产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(4):10-15.
	REN Lisha, GU Riliang, JIA Guangyao, et al. Effects of Seed Emergence Rate on Individual Growth and Group Yield of Maize[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(4):10-15.
[29]	李建疆, 梁晓东, 金平. 新疆主要春小麦品种耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2007, 44(S1):78-80.
	LI Jianjiang, LIANG Xiaodong, JIN Ping. Identification of Salt Tolerance of Main Spring Wheat Varieties in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 44(S1):78-80.
[30]	郭超, 胡思远, 郑青焕, 等. 部分美国小麦种质资源的耐盐性鉴定[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35(8):1076-1084.
	GUO Chao, HU Siyuan, ZHENG Qinghuan, et al. Salt tolerance identification of some wheat germplasm resources in the United States[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2015, 35(8):1076-1084.
[31]	库尼都孜阿依·吐尔汗, 任毅, 颜安, 等. 新疆冬小麦品种萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(1):20-31. DOI
	Kuniduzai Turhan, REN Yi, YAN An, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of Xinjiang winter wheat varieties during germination and screening of salt-tolerant germplasm[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(1):20-31.
[32]	孟祥浩, 林琪, 张玉梅, 等. 盐胁迫对小麦萌发的影响及耐盐指标的筛选[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(4):175-180. DOI
	MENG Xianghao, LIN Qi, ZHANG Yumei, et al. Effects of Salt Stress on Wheat Germination and Screening of Salt Tolerance Indexes[J]. North China Agricultural Journal, 2014, 29(4):175-180.
[33]	乔佩, 卢存福, 李红梅, 等. 盐胁迫对诱变小麦种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(6):720-727.
	QIAO Pei, LU Cunfu, LI Hongmei, et al. Effects of salt stress on seed germination and physiological characteristics of mutagenized wheat seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 2013, 21(6):720-727.
[34]	Kerepesi I, Galiba G. Osmotic and Salt Stress‐In Duced Alteration in Soluble Carbohydrate Content in Wheat Seedlings[J]. Crop Science, 2000, 40(2): 482-487. DOI URL
[35]	王萍, 杨春桥, 焦阵. NaCl胁迫对小麦种子萌发与幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(2):127-131.
	WANG Ping, YANG Chunqiao, JIAO Zhen. Effects of NaCl stress on wheat seed germination and seedling growth[J]. China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(2):127-131.
[36]	王芳, 段迪, 段培, 等. 不同耐盐性小麦胚芽鞘伸长对NaCl胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2007,(12):2053-2058.
	WANG Fang, DUAN Di, DUAN Pei, et al. Response of Coleoptile Elongation to NaCl Stress in Wheat with Different Salt Tolerance[J]. Chinese Journal of Crops, 2007,(12):2053-2058.

编号 Num- ber	材料 Material		来源 Source		D值		耐盐类型 Salt resistant type		编号 Num- ber		材料 Material	来源 Source		D值		耐盐类型 Salt resistant type
1	濑户小麦		日本		0.61		Ⅱ		40		S 5746	芬兰		0.38		Ⅲ
2	Tcerros(CHECK)		未知		0.58		Ⅱ		41		Samarskaja	芬兰		0.60		Ⅱ
3	Yakwax Eqypgotimstein		缅甸		0.74		Ⅰ		42		Saminkel	芬兰		0.43		Ⅲ
4	澄利马拉		意大利		0.71		Ⅰ		43		Sea Wari 48	澳大利亚		0.26		Ⅳ
5	卡培蒂		意大利		0.49		Ⅱ		44		Simbar Benvenuto	澳大利亚		0.39		Ⅲ
6	吉尔吉奥 449		意大利		0.53		Ⅱ		45		Simons Berg	澳大利亚		0.62		Ⅱ
7	季拉多 593		意大利		0.70		Ⅰ		46		Skov	澳大利亚		0.57		Ⅱ
8	季拉多 522		意大利		0.77		Ⅰ		47		Suno 43626	德国		0.29		Ⅳ
9	GLENNSON 81		未知		0.64		Ⅰ		48		TA 3291	瑞典		0.59		Ⅱ
10	Horani		波兰		0.67		Ⅰ		49		TA 4656	瑞典		0.62		Ⅱ
11	Duiken		未知		0.66		Ⅰ		50		White Fife	加拿大		0.56		Ⅱ
12	Dvina		未知		0.57		Ⅱ		51		MEXICO 82	墨西哥		0.43		Ⅲ
13	Farrerton		未知		0.58		Ⅱ		52		Zipa 57	哥伦比亚		0.43		Ⅲ
14	FarwarD		未知		0.52		Ⅱ		53		Par	未知		0.36		Ⅲ
15	Gereral Urquiza		未知		0.48		Ⅱ		54		Purple S556	墨西哥		0.16		Ⅳ
16	Giza 141		埃及		0.69		Ⅰ		55		Pusa/Etiole De chisy Sr29	墨西哥		0.66		Ⅰ
17	GolDen 731		美国		0.68		Ⅰ		56		Quilamapu 10-077	墨西哥		0.28		Ⅳ
18	Gullen		未知		0.48		Ⅱ		57		R Kf	墨西哥		0.60		Ⅱ
19	W.S. 25		未知		0.76		Ⅰ		58		Rnbw 234	墨西哥		0.49		Ⅱ
20	HybriD 25		未知		0.51		Ⅱ		59		SK 989	澳大利亚		0.51		Ⅱ
21	Kamyshinskaja 3		前苏联		0.53		Ⅱ		60		Songlen	澳大利亚		0.37		Ⅲ
22	Kartner Fruhweizen	前苏联		0.74		Ⅰ		61		SERI 82			墨西哥		0.56		Ⅱ
23	Kenya 178 Q8	肯尼亚		0.44		Ⅲ		62		Sw Sv 22			澳大利亚		0.38		Ⅲ
24	Kenya 10866	肯尼亚		0.69		Ⅰ		63		Tr 535			澳大利亚		0.65		Ⅰ
25	Kenya B 286	阿根廷		0.60		Ⅱ		64		农林28			日本		0.30		Ⅳ
26	Klein H211T 1422	阿根廷		0.56		Ⅱ		65		先驱麦			日本		0.57		Ⅱ
27	Klein Trou	阿根廷		0.43		Ⅲ		66		Atri 3890/Skl			日本		0.08		Ⅳ
28	Kommunar	阿根廷		0.39		Ⅲ		67		Hohenwettersbacher Begrannter			德国		0.61		Ⅱ
29	Mironovskaja Rann	未知		0.50		Ⅱ		68		HolzapfelsDarwin			德国		0.37		Ⅲ
30	Pacific Blue Stem	未知		0.46		Ⅲ		69		Nap Hal-Atlas66 Sel 4			德国		0.50		Ⅱ
31	TuNco"s"	墨西哥		0.58		Ⅱ		70		Bob white"s"			未知		0.74		Ⅰ
32	PreluDio	巴西		0.45		Ⅲ		71		Maya 74			未知		0.72		Ⅰ
33	Premorsky	未知		0.52		Ⅱ		72		Cnt 1			巴西		0.21		Ⅳ
34	Primorskaja 1130	未知		0.56		Ⅱ		73		阿克斯克娅79			前苏联		0.25		Ⅳ
35	Puglee	未知		0.55		Ⅱ		74		моц щопус26			前苏联		0.60		Ⅱ
36	Purora	未知		0.57		Ⅱ		75		CaDet(CI 12053)			美国		0.62		Ⅱ
37	Rafaela 6MA	阿根廷		0.53		Ⅱ		76		Kitchener			美国		0.73		Ⅰ
38	Ruskea	芬兰		0.48		Ⅱ		77		8 turgeon			美国		0.41		Ⅲ
39	S 468	芬兰		0.44		Ⅲ

编号 Num- ber	材料 Material		来源 Source		D值		耐盐类型 Salt resistant type		编号 Num- ber		材料 Material	来源 Source		D值		耐盐类型 Salt resistant type
1	濑户小麦		日本		0.61		Ⅱ		40		S 5746	芬兰		0.38		Ⅲ
2	Tcerros(CHECK)		未知		0.58		Ⅱ		41		Samarskaja	芬兰		0.60		Ⅱ
3	Yakwax Eqypgotimstein		缅甸		0.74		Ⅰ		42		Saminkel	芬兰		0.43		Ⅲ
4	澄利马拉		意大利		0.71		Ⅰ		43		Sea Wari 48	澳大利亚		0.26		Ⅳ
5	卡培蒂		意大利		0.49		Ⅱ		44		Simbar Benvenuto	澳大利亚		0.39		Ⅲ
6	吉尔吉奥 449		意大利		0.53		Ⅱ		45		Simons Berg	澳大利亚		0.62		Ⅱ
7	季拉多 593		意大利		0.70		Ⅰ		46		Skov	澳大利亚		0.57		Ⅱ
8	季拉多 522		意大利		0.77		Ⅰ		47		Suno 43626	德国		0.29		Ⅳ
9	GLENNSON 81		未知		0.64		Ⅰ		48		TA 3291	瑞典		0.59		Ⅱ
10	Horani		波兰		0.67		Ⅰ		49		TA 4656	瑞典		0.62		Ⅱ
11	Duiken		未知		0.66		Ⅰ		50		White Fife	加拿大		0.56		Ⅱ
12	Dvina		未知		0.57		Ⅱ		51		MEXICO 82	墨西哥		0.43		Ⅲ
13	Farrerton		未知		0.58		Ⅱ		52		Zipa 57	哥伦比亚		0.43		Ⅲ
14	FarwarD		未知		0.52		Ⅱ		53		Par	未知		0.36		Ⅲ
15	Gereral Urquiza		未知		0.48		Ⅱ		54		Purple S556	墨西哥		0.16		Ⅳ
16	Giza 141		埃及		0.69		Ⅰ		55		Pusa/Etiole De chisy Sr29	墨西哥		0.66		Ⅰ
17	GolDen 731		美国		0.68		Ⅰ		56		Quilamapu 10-077	墨西哥		0.28		Ⅳ
18	Gullen		未知		0.48		Ⅱ		57		R Kf	墨西哥		0.60		Ⅱ
19	W.S. 25		未知		0.76		Ⅰ		58		Rnbw 234	墨西哥		0.49		Ⅱ
20	HybriD 25		未知		0.51		Ⅱ		59		SK 989	澳大利亚		0.51		Ⅱ
21	Kamyshinskaja 3		前苏联		0.53		Ⅱ		60		Songlen	澳大利亚		0.37		Ⅲ
22	Kartner Fruhweizen	前苏联		0.74		Ⅰ		61		SERI 82			墨西哥		0.56		Ⅱ
23	Kenya 178 Q8	肯尼亚		0.44		Ⅲ		62		Sw Sv 22			澳大利亚		0.38		Ⅲ
24	Kenya 10866	肯尼亚		0.69		Ⅰ		63		Tr 535			澳大利亚		0.65		Ⅰ
25	Kenya B 286	阿根廷		0.60		Ⅱ		64		农林28			日本		0.30		Ⅳ
26	Klein H211T 1422	阿根廷		0.56		Ⅱ		65		先驱麦			日本		0.57		Ⅱ
27	Klein Trou	阿根廷		0.43		Ⅲ		66		Atri 3890/Skl			日本		0.08		Ⅳ
28	Kommunar	阿根廷		0.39		Ⅲ		67		Hohenwettersbacher Begrannter			德国		0.61		Ⅱ
29	Mironovskaja Rann	未知		0.50		Ⅱ		68		HolzapfelsDarwin			德国		0.37		Ⅲ
30	Pacific Blue Stem	未知		0.46		Ⅲ		69		Nap Hal-Atlas66 Sel 4			德国		0.50		Ⅱ
31	TuNco"s"	墨西哥		0.58		Ⅱ		70		Bob white"s"			未知		0.74		Ⅰ
32	PreluDio	巴西		0.45		Ⅲ		71		Maya 74			未知		0.72		Ⅰ
33	Premorsky	未知		0.52		Ⅱ		72		Cnt 1			巴西		0.21		Ⅳ
34	Primorskaja 1130	未知		0.56		Ⅱ		73		阿克斯克娅79			前苏联		0.25		Ⅳ
35	Puglee	未知		0.55		Ⅱ		74		моц щопус26			前苏联		0.60		Ⅱ
36	Purora	未知		0.57		Ⅱ		75		CaDet(CI 12053)			美国		0.62		Ⅱ
37	Rafaela 6MA	阿根廷		0.53		Ⅱ		76		Kitchener			美国		0.73		Ⅰ
38	Ruskea	芬兰		0.48		Ⅱ		77		8 turgeon			美国		0.41		Ⅲ
39	S 468	芬兰		0.44		Ⅲ

处理 Treatment	参数 Parameters	最长根长 Radical length (cm)	苗高 Shoot height (cm)	根数 Radical number	胚芽鞘长 Coleoptile length (cm)	根鲜重 Root fresh weight (mg)	幼苗鲜重 Seedling fresh weight (mg)	根干重 Root dry weight (mg)	幼苗干重 Seedling dry weight (mg)	发芽势 Germin- ation poten tial (%)	发芽率 Germin- ation rate (%)
NaCl 胁迫 NaCl stress	最小值Min.	0.633	0.57	3.00	1.03	9.27	13.37	2.00	2.67	0.00	2.00
	最大值Max.	5.93	8.26	6.68	4.10	54.78	70.20	7.33	13.33	100	100
	均值Average	3.01	4.23	4.90	2.58	33.29	45.77	4.92	7.11	41.64	47.65
	标准差SD	0.97	1.48	0.60	0.58	8.82	12.01	1.17	1.89	33.54	34.44
	变异系数CV (%)	32.23	35.00	12.18	22.47	26.49	26.25	23.74	26.56	80.54	72.29
对照 Control	最小值Min.	8.27	8.08	3.00	1.82	41.1	63.93	4.33	9.2	0.67	3.33
	最大值Max.	19.44	19.49	7.33	4.29	124.78	205.06	14	20.67	100	100
	均值Average	14.67	12.10	4.91	2.87	78.84	116.69	10.09	13.43	57.00	64.58
	标准差SD	2.10	2.02	0.62	0.52	18.67	28.79	2.08	2.64	35.43	33.93
	变异系数CV (%)	14.33	16.73	12.60	18.06	23.68	24.67	20.62	19.69	62.15	52.53
较对照变化 Comparison with the control	均值Average	-11.66	-7.87	-0.01	-0.29	-45.55	-70.93	-5.18	-6.32	-15.37	-16.94
较对照变化 Comparison with the control	变异系数 CV (%)	17.91	18.27	-0.42	4.41	2.81	1.58	3.11	6.88	18.40	19.76

处理 Treatment	参数 Parameters	最长根长 Radical length (cm)	苗高 Shoot height (cm)	根数 Radical number	胚芽鞘长 Coleoptile length (cm)	根鲜重 Root fresh weight (mg)	幼苗鲜重 Seedling fresh weight (mg)	根干重 Root dry weight (mg)	幼苗干重 Seedling dry weight (mg)	发芽势 Germin- ation poten tial (%)	发芽率 Germin- ation rate (%)
NaCl 胁迫 NaCl stress	最小值Min.	0.633	0.57	3.00	1.03	9.27	13.37	2.00	2.67	0.00	2.00
	最大值Max.	5.93	8.26	6.68	4.10	54.78	70.20	7.33	13.33	100	100
	均值Average	3.01	4.23	4.90	2.58	33.29	45.77	4.92	7.11	41.64	47.65
	标准差SD	0.97	1.48	0.60	0.58	8.82	12.01	1.17	1.89	33.54	34.44
	变异系数CV (%)	32.23	35.00	12.18	22.47	26.49	26.25	23.74	26.56	80.54	72.29
对照 Control	最小值Min.	8.27	8.08	3.00	1.82	41.1	63.93	4.33	9.2	0.67	3.33
	最大值Max.	19.44	19.49	7.33	4.29	124.78	205.06	14	20.67	100	100
	均值Average	14.67	12.10	4.91	2.87	78.84	116.69	10.09	13.43	57.00	64.58
	标准差SD	2.10	2.02	0.62	0.52	18.67	28.79	2.08	2.64	35.43	33.93
	变异系数CV (%)	14.33	16.73	12.60	18.06	23.68	24.67	20.62	19.69	62.15	52.53
较对照变化 Comparison with the control	均值Average	-11.66	-7.87	-0.01	-0.29	-45.55	-70.93	-5.18	-6.32	-15.37	-16.94
较对照变化 Comparison with the control	变异系数 CV (%)	17.91	18.27	-0.42	4.41	2.81	1.58	3.11	6.88	18.40	19.76

测定指标 InDex	相对最长根长 Relative radical length	相对幼苗高 Relative shoot height	相对根数 Relative radical number	相对胚芽鞘 Relative coleoptile length	相对根鲜重 Relative root fresh weight	相对幼苗鲜重 Relative seedling fresh weight	相对根干重 Relative root dry weight	相对幼苗干重 Relative seedling dry weight	相对发芽势 Relative germination potential	相对发芽率 Relative germination rate
相对最长根长 Relative radical length
相对幼苗高 Relative shoot height	0.522^**
相对根数 Relative radical number	-0.088	0.158
相对胚芽鞘 Relative coleoptile length	0.446^**	0.610^**	0.379^**
相对根鲜重 Relative root fresh weight	0.665^**	0.515^**	0.215	0.470^**
相对幼苗鲜重 Relative seedling fresh weight	0.469^**	0.767^**	0.331^**	0.673^**	0.635^**
相对根干重 Relative root dry weight	0.456^**	0.262^*	0.003	0.290^*	0.526^**	0.297^**
相对幼苗干重 Relative seedling dry weight	0.396^**	0.716^**	0.268^*	0.594^**	0.517^**	0.711^**	0.415^**
相对发芽势 Relative germination potential	0.336^**	0.406^**	0.312^**	0.539^**	0.471^**	0.580^**	0.188	0.517^**
相对发芽率 Relative germination rate	0.184	0.222	0.352^**	0.346^**	0.308^**	0.373^**	0.100	0.359^**	0.789^**	1

Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties

引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

耐盐类型 Salt-tolerant type	D值均值 D value mean	全部品种 All varieties
耐盐类型 Salt-tolerant type	D值均值 D value mean	品种数 No.of varieties	频率 Frequency (%)
Ⅰ 耐盐型 Ⅰsalt resistant type	0.70	17		22.08
Ⅱ 中度耐盐型 Ⅱ salt resistant type	0.55	36		46.75
Ⅲ 盐敏感型 Ⅲ salt resistant type	0.41	16		20.78
Ⅳ 盐高感型 Ⅳ salt resistant type	0.23	8		10.39
合计Total		77		100

主成分 Principal component	初始特征值 Initial eigenvalue			提取平方和载入 Extract the sum of squares and load
主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigenvalue	方差百分比 Percentage of variance (%)	累积总方差贡献率 Cumulative total variance contribution rate (%)	特征值 Eigenvalue	方差百分比 Percentage of variance (%)	累积总方差贡献率 Cumulative total variance contribution rate (%)
1	4.03	44.778	44.778	4.03	44.778	44.778
2	1.671	18.571	63.349	1.671	18.571	63.349
3	1.053	11.696	75.045
4	0.78	7.76	81.86
5	0.56	5.64	87.49
6	0.43	4.29	91.78
7	0.28	2.84	94.63
8	0.22	2.22	96.84
9	0.17	1.68	98.52
10	0.15	1.48	100.00

主成分 Principal component	最长根长 Radical length (cm)	苗高 Shoot height (cm)	根数 Radical number	胚芽鞘长 Coleoptile length (cm)	根鲜重 Root fresh weight (mg)	幼苗鲜重 Seedling fresh weight (mg)	根干重 Root dry weight (mg)	幼苗干重 Seedling dry weight (mg)
1	0.65	0.79	0.37	0.79	0.78	0.87	0.49	0.82
2	-0.51	-0.18	0.62	0.09	-0.27	0.02	-0.5	-0.03

[1]	WANG Chunsheng, LI Jianfeng, ZHANG Yueqiang, FAN Zheru, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, XIA Jianqiang, WANG Fangping, ZHAO Qi. Study on genotypic differences of anther culture ability in mainly cultivated spring wheat varieties in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2081-2086.
[2]	DONG Zhiduo, XU Fei, FU Qiuping, HUANG Jian, QI Tong, MENG Ajing, FU Yanbo, Kaisaier Kuerban. Effects of different types of salt and alkali stress on cotton seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844.
[3]	YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871.
[4]	YUAN Yilin, YAN An, ZUO Xiaoxiao, HOU Zhengqing, ZHANG Zhenfei, XIAO Shuting, SUN Zhe, MA Mengqian, ZHAO Yuhang. Impact of reduced nitrogen fertilization combined with bio-organic fertilizer on spring wheat yield enhancement and soil enrichment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882.
[5]	LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comparative on the vigor differences of spring wheat seeds of different sizes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887.
[6]	XI Rui, CHEN Yijia, LI Ning, YU Qinghui, WANG Qiang, QIN Yong. Effects of exogenous 2, 4-epibrassinolide on seed germination of different salt-sensitive tomatoes under salt stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1983-1992.
[7]	YANG Mei, ZHAO Hongmei, Dilireba Xiamixiding, YANG Weijun, ZHANG Jinshan, HUI Chao. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and biochar application on population structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589.
[8]	WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao. Evaluation of drought resistance of different Kazakhstan spring wheat at seeding stage under PEG-6000 stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360.
[9]	ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, SHI Jia, KONG Depeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, LI Jianfeng, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru, ZHANG Yueqiang. Effects of soil moisture on leaf protective enzyme activities and yield of spring wheat cultivars with different drought resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047.
[10]	Gulinigaer Tuerhong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, ZHANG Lulu, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different priming treatments on seed vigor and physiological characteristics of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 869-877.
[11]	OU Yuan, LUO Shasha, WANG Ruyue, SUN Yali, HU Haifang. Effects of salt stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of american black walnut seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 393-401.
[12]	LIU Huifang, WANG Qiang, HAN Hongwei, ZHUANG Hongmei, WANG Hao, CHANG Yanan. Effects of salt, alkali and complex salt alkali stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activity of tomato seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2658-2666.
[13]	DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[14]	LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[15]	LAI Hanlin, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, YANG Hong, LI Yue, LEI Junjie, LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng. Effects of temperature and salt stress on seed germination characteristics of Descurainia sophia [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1326-1334.