新疆北疆日光温室不同栽培模式下甜樱桃果实品质的差异性评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.02.022

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 446-453.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.02.022

新疆北疆日光温室不同栽培模式下甜樱桃果实品质的差异性评价

张锦强(), 杨湘, 苏学德, 王欢欢, 李铭, 李鹏程()

新疆农垦科学院林园研究所/库尔勒香梨种质创新与提质增效兵团重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000

收稿日期:2024-08-03 出版日期:2025-02-20 发布日期:2025-04-17
通信作者: 李鹏程(1983-),男,甘肃武威人,研究员,硕士,研究方向为果树栽培生理,(E-mail)lpc830916@163.com
作者简介:张锦强(1995-),男,甘肃张掖人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为果树栽培生理,(E-mail)1179956494@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团重大科技计划项目(2022AA001);新疆生产建设兵团科技创新人才计划-科技创新骨干人才项目(2022CB003-02)

Evaluation of fruit quality difference of sweet cherry under different cultivation modes in solar greenhouse in northern Xinjiang

ZHANG Jinqiang(), YANG Xiang, SU Xuede, WANG Huanhuan, LI Ming, LI Pengcheng()

Institute of Horticulture, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science/Construction Crop Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm innovation and quality improvement and efficiency increment,Shehezi Xinjiang 832000,China

Received:2024-08-03 Published:2025-02-20 Online:2025-04-17
Supported by:
Major Scientific R & D Program Project of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(2022AA001);Innovation Ability Training Project for Young Sci-Tech Backbone Talents of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(2022CB003-02)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究日光温室甜樱桃不同栽培模式下果实品质差异性,为新疆北疆日光温室甜樱桃栽培科学管理提供理论依据。【方法】以新疆北疆日光温室主栽品种美早甜樱桃作为研究对象,比较测定直立和一边倒2种栽培模式下甜樱桃果实成熟期24项品质指标,采用变异、相关性及主成分分析筛选核心指标,利用AHP层次分析建立综合品质评价模型。【结果】不同栽培模式甜樱桃果实各项指标存在差异,其中甜度值、可食率、总酸、a^*和葡萄糖为甜樱桃果实品质评价的核心指标;建立了甜樱桃果实品质评价模型Y(综合得分)=0.121×可食率的标准化值+0.075×a^*的标准化值+0.199×甜度值的标准化值+0.068×总酸含量的标准化值+0.037×葡萄糖含量的标准化值。【结论】直立栽培模式下甜樱桃果实综合品质优于一边倒栽培模式。

关键词: 甜樱桃; 栽培模式; 品质; 综合评价

Abstract:

【Objective】To clarify the differences in fruit quality of sweet cherries under different cultivation modes in sunlight greenhouses and provide theoretical basis for research and scientific management of sweet cherry cultivation in sunlight greenhouses in northern Xinjiang.【Methods】This study focused on the main variety of sweet cherry Meizao grown in a sunlight greenhouse in northern Xinjiang. Comparing upright and one-sided modes of 24 quality indicators during fruit ripening were measured, and core indicators were selected through variance analysis, correlation analysis, and principal component analysis. A comprehensive quality evaluation model was established using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). 【Results】The results showed that there were differences in various indicators of sweet cherry fruit under different cultivation modes, among which sweetness value, edible rate, total acid, a^*, and glucose were the core indicators for evaluating the quality of sweet cherry fruit; A sweet cherry fruit quality evaluation model Y (comprehensive score)=0.121 was established using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) × Standardized value of edible rate+0.075 × The standardized value of a^*+0.199 × Normalized sweetness value+0.068 × Normalized value of total acid content+0.037 × Standardized value of glucose content.【Conclusion】The evaluation results show that the comprehensive fruit quality of the upright cultivation mode is relatively better than that of the one sided cultivation mode.

Key words: sweet cherry; cultivation mode; quality; comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

S661.1

张锦强, 杨湘, 苏学德, 王欢欢, 李铭, 李鹏程. 新疆北疆日光温室不同栽培模式下甜樱桃果实品质的差异性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 446-453.

ZHANG Jinqiang, YANG Xiang, SU Xuede, WANG Huanhuan, LI Ming, LI Pengcheng. Evaluation of fruit quality difference of sweet cherry under different cultivation modes in solar greenhouse in northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 446-453.

图/表 7

参考文献 27

[1]	包九零, 乔光, 刘沛宇, 等. 不同品种大樱桃果实品质的评价[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2016, 35(3): 12-16.
	BAO Jiuling, QIAO Guang, LIU Peiyu, et al. Evaluating fruit qualities of different sweet cherry cultivars[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2016, 35(3): 12-16.
[2]	纠松涛, 徐岩, 廖樟华, 等. 甜樱桃在上海地区的生物学特性评价与分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(12): 4164-4176.
	JIU Songtao, XU Yan, LIAO Zhanghua, et al. Evaluation and research of the biological characteristics of sweet cherries in Shanghai[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(12): 4164-4176.
[3]	张素敏, 杨巍, 王柏松, 等. 12个甜樱桃品种果实品质特征评价[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2022, 43(20): 73-82.
	ZHANG Sumin, YANG Wei, WANG Bai\|Bo(Song), et al. Evaluation of fruit quality characteristics of 12 sweet cherry varieties[J]. Food Research and Development, 2022, 43(20): 73-82.
[4]	胡青青, 佃袁勇, 龚赞, 等. 不同栽培模式的纽荷尔脐橙果实品质分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(5): 108-115.
	HU Qingqing, (DIAN/TIAN) Yuanyong, GONG Zan, et al. Analyzing fruit quality of Newhall navel oranges with different cultivation patterns[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2022, 41(5): 108-115.
[5]	李发毅, 吕亮雨, 李建领, 等. 栽培模式和栽植方向对宁夏枸杞生长特性、果实品质及产量的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2023(3): 60-65.
	LI Fayi, LÜ Liangyu, LI Jianling, et al. Effects of cultivation mode and planting direction on growth characteristics, fruit quality and yield of Lycium barbarum L[J]. China Fruits, 2023(3): 60-65.
[6]	崔冬冬, 孙岩, 李勃. 甜樱桃的高纺锤形整形修剪方法[J]. 落叶果树, 2016, 48(2): 42-43.
	CUI Dongdong, SUN Yan, LI Bo. High spindle shaped shaping and pruning method for sweet cherries[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2016, 48(2): 42-43.
[7]	赵梅. 三种整形方式对甜樱桃‘吉美’果实品质及产量的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.
	ZHAO Mei. Effects of three pruning methods on fruit quality and yield of Prunus avium L. ‘Jimei’[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2021.
[8]	徐英, 陈昱含, 曹玉翠, 等. 甜樱桃采用KGB树形栽培的技术与效果[J]. 落叶果树, 2022, 54(2): 75-77.
	XU Ying, CHEN Yuhan, CAO Yucui, et al. Technology and effects of KGB tree-shaped cultivation of sweet cherries[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2022, 54(2): 75-77.
[9]	洪莉, 董军, 陈令会, 等. 浙江台州地区甜樱桃不同品种及树形组合筛选[J]. 中国南方果树, 2021, 50(4): 109-113, 116.
	HONG Li, DONG Jun, CHEN Linghui, et al. Screening of combinations of different cultivars and tree forms of sweet cherry in Taizhou of Zhejiang Province[J]. South China Fruits, 2021, 50(4): 109-113, 116.
[10]	田永强, 聂国伟, 李凯, 等. 日光温室甜樱桃叶片叶绿素含量影响因子初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(2): 64-67. DOI
	TIAN Yongqiang, NIE Guowei, LI Kai, et al. Affecting factors of chlorophyll content of sweet cherry leaves in solar greenhouse[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(2): 64-67. DOI
[11]	兰官却才郎, 陆洋, 梁国平, 等. 河西走廊不同产地‘黑比诺’葡萄果实品质评价[J/OL]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2023 (2023-12-21). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1055.s.20231220.1503.002.html.
	LAN Guanquecailang, LU Yang, LIANG Guoping, et al. Fruit quality evaluation of ‘Pinot noir’ grapes from different producing areas in Hexi Corridor[J/OL]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2023 (2023-12-21). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1055.s.20231220.1503.002.html.
[12]	韩中庚. 数学建模方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005.
	HAN Zhonggeng. Methods and applications of mathematical modeling[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2005.
[13]	邓健康, 刘璇, 吴昕烨, 等. 基于层次分析和灰色关联度法的苹果(等外果)汁品质评价[J]. 中国食品学报, 2017, 17(4): 197-208.
	DENG Jiankang, LIU Xuan, WU Xinye, et al. Quality evaluation of apple(substandard) juice from different cultivars based on analytic hierarchy process and grey interconnect degree analysis[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2017, 17(4): 197-208.
[14]	木合塔尔·扎热, 故丽米热·卡克什, 吴正保, 等. 灰枣不同枝龄二次枝果实品质综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(22): 296-302.
	Muhetaer Zhare, Gulimire Kakeshen, Wu Zhengbao, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on the fruit quality of different age secondary branches in’Huizao’jujube[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(22): 296-302.
[15]	蒋卉, 丁慧萍, 白红进. 新疆南疆引进鲜食枣品种品质性状的综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(3): 55-59. DOI
	JIANG Hui, DING Huiping, BAI Hongjin. Comprehensive assessment of quality characteristics of introduced table jujube cultivars in southern Xinjiang[J]. Food Science, 2016, 37(3): 55-59. DOI
[16]	孙亚强, 吴翠云, 王德, 等. 野生酸枣资源果实品质因子分析及评价指标选择[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(9): 29-34. DOI
	SUN Yaqiang, WU Cuiyun, WANG De, et al. Selection of quality indicators and factor analysis for fruit quality evaluation of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa germplasms[J]. Food Science, 2016, 37(9): 29-34. DOI
[17]	魏国芹, 孙玉刚, 孙杨, 等. 甜樱桃果实发育过程中糖酸含量的变化[J]. 果树学报, 2014, 31(S1): 103-109.
	WEI Guoqin, SUN Yugang, SUN Yang, et al. Changes of sugar and acid constituents in sweet cherry during fruit development[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2014, 31(S1): 103-109.
[18]	哈小丽, 韩占江, 王志强. 不同种植模式对红枣产量和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(10): 39-42.
	HA Xiaoli, HAN Zhanjiang, WANG Zhiqiang. Effect of different planting patterns on yield and quality of jujube[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(10): 39-42.
[19]	姜凤超, 王玉柱, 孙浩元, 等. 宽窄行种植对桃树光照分布与果实产量和品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(1): 165-169, 212.
	JIANG Fengchao, WANG Yuzhu, SUN Haoyuan, et al. Effects of wide and narrow row planting system on light distribution and quality & yield of peach[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(1): 165-169, 212.
[20]	余路明, 韩金磊, 李胜利. 不同种植方式对大跨度外覆盖大棚番茄群体微环境及植株生长与产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2020(2): 45-51.
	YU Luming, HAN Jinlei, LI Shengli. Effects of different planting ways on population microenvironment, plant growth, yield and quality of tomato grown in large-span outer covered greenhouse[J]. China Vegetables, 2020(2): 45-51.
[21]	夏宏义, 刘巧, 彭家清, 等. ‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄避雨栽培f式树形对光合及果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2024, 51(3): 560-570.
	XIA Hongyi, LIU Qiao, PENG Jiaqing, et al. Effects of f-shaped tree shape on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality in‘shine Muscat’Grapevines with rain-shelter cultivation[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(3): 560-570. DOI
[22]	施洋, 施庆华, 高进, 等. 不同树形对超大保温棚油桃品质及效益的影响[J]. 西北园艺(果树), 2019,(2): 46-47.
	SHI Yang, SHI Qinghua, GAO Jin, et al. The influence of different tree shapes on the quality and benefits of oil peaches in super large insulated greenhouses[J]. Northwest Horticulture, 2019,(2): 46-47.
[23]	马婧, 汪有科, 杨荣慧, 等. 不同树形结构梨枣的冠层特性及节水性分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(3): 138-143.
	MA Jing, WANG Youke, YANG Ronghui, et al. Analysis on canopy characteristics and water saving of pear jujube in different training systems[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(3): 138-143.
[24]	王莺, 王静, 姚玉璧, 等. 基于主成分分析的中国南方干旱脆弱性评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(12): 1897-1904.
	WANG Ying, WANG Jing, YAO Yubi, et al. Evaluation of drought vulnerability in Southern China based on principal component analysis[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(12): 1897-1904.
[25]	吴澎, 贾朝爽, 范苏仪, 等. 樱桃品种果实品质因子主成分分析及模糊综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17): 291-300.
	WU Peng, JIA Chaoshuang, FAN Suyi, et al. Principal component analysis and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality in cultivars of cherry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(17): 291-300.
[26]	Saaty T L. An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”[J]. Management Science, 1990, 36(3): 259-268.
[27]	伍晓玲, 项昭保, 刘禹盟. 层次分析法在食品工业中的应用[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2016, 37(1): 208-211.
	WU Xiaoling, XIANG Zhaobao, LIU Yumeng. Application of analytic hierarchy process on food industry[J]. Food Research and Development, 2016, 37(1): 208-211.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	2	0	0	5

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	6	1
比例	86%	14%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	46

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	16	30
比例	35%	65%

处理 Treatments	单果重 Single fruit weight (g)	纵径 Longitudinal diameter (mm)	横径 Transverse diameter (mm)	果形指数 Fruit shape index	硬度 Hardness(kg/cm²)	可食率 Edible rate (%)	L^*	a^*	b^*
直立 Erect	14.97±0.25^a	27.01±1.91^a	31.06±1.16^a	0.87±0.08^a	6.36±0.35^b	73.96±5.02^a	35.66±1.10^a	31.10±3.52^a	16.56±0.95^a
一边倒 Lean to one side	15.22±0.72^a	29.83±1.20^a	31.82±1.81^a	0.94±0.03^a	6.76±0.34^a	70.55±1.99^a	31.98±2.35^b	28.38±1.46^a	15.26±1.14^a
均值 Mean value	14.26	29.16	31.68	0.92	6.50	72.26	33.65	28.88	14.57
标准差 Standard deviation	1.44	1.73	1.72	0.06	0.42	3.89	2.36	2.88	3.31
变异系数 Coefficient of variation	0.10	0.06	0.05	0.07	0.06	0.05	0.07	0.10	0.23

处理 Treatments	单果重 Single fruit weight (g)	纵径 Longitudinal diameter (mm)	横径 Transverse diameter (mm)	果形指数 Fruit shape index	硬度 Hardness(kg/cm²)	可食率 Edible rate (%)	L^*	a^*	b^*
直立 Erect	14.97±0.25^a	27.01±1.91^a	31.06±1.16^a	0.87±0.08^a	6.36±0.35^b	73.96±5.02^a	35.66±1.10^a	31.10±3.52^a	16.56±0.95^a
一边倒 Lean to one side	15.22±0.72^a	29.83±1.20^a	31.82±1.81^a	0.94±0.03^a	6.76±0.34^a	70.55±1.99^a	31.98±2.35^b	28.38±1.46^a	15.26±1.14^a
均值 Mean value	14.26	29.16	31.68	0.92	6.50	72.26	33.65	28.88	14.57
标准差 Standard deviation	1.44	1.73	1.72	0.06	0.42	3.89	2.36	2.88	3.31
变异系数 Coefficient of variation	0.10	0.06	0.05	0.07	0.06	0.05	0.07	0.10	0.23

处理 Treatments	可溶性固形物 Soluble solids (%)	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mg/g)	总酸 Total acidity (%)	葡萄糖 Glucose (mg/g)	果糖 Fructose (mg/g)	蔗糖 Sucrose (mg/g)	糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio	甜度值 Sweetness value
直立 Erect	14.66±0.95^a	126.90±5.96^a	0.45±0.02^b	23.28±0.82^a	34.31±1.60^a	54.37±2.70^a	28.16±1.44^a	130.71±4.94^a
一边倒 Lean to one side	15.26±1.14^a	126.64±6.74^a	0.54±0.01^a	23.60±1.36^a	34.70±1.60^a	52.71±3.30^a	23.58±1.43^b	130.24±6.10^a
均值 Mean value	14.96	126.77	0.49	23.44	34.51	53.68	25.87	130.48
标准差 Standard deviation	1.04	5.69	0.05	1.02	1.45	2.80	2.82	4.97
变异系数 Coefficient of variation	0.07	0.04	0.10	0.04	0.04	0.05	0.11	0.04

处理 Treatments	可溶性固形物 Soluble solids (%)	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mg/g)	总酸 Total acidity (%)	葡萄糖 Glucose (mg/g)	果糖 Fructose (mg/g)	蔗糖 Sucrose (mg/g)	糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio	甜度值 Sweetness value
直立 Erect	14.66±0.95^a	126.90±5.96^a	0.45±0.02^b	23.28±0.82^a	34.31±1.60^a	54.37±2.70^a	28.16±1.44^a	130.71±4.94^a
一边倒 Lean to one side	15.26±1.14^a	126.64±6.74^a	0.54±0.01^a	23.60±1.36^a	34.70±1.60^a	52.71±3.30^a	23.58±1.43^b	130.24±6.10^a
均值 Mean value	14.96	126.77	0.49	23.44	34.51	53.68	25.87	130.48
标准差 Standard deviation	1.04	5.69	0.05	1.02	1.45	2.80	2.82	4.97
变异系数 Coefficient of variation	0.07	0.04	0.10	0.04	0.04	0.05	0.11	0.04

处理 Treatments	VC (mg/100g)	花色苷 Anthocyanin (μg/g)	类黄酮 Flavonoids (μg/g)	氨基酸 Amino acid (μg/g)	单宁 Tannin (mg/g)	总酚 Phenolics (mg/g)	可溶性果胶 Soluble pectin (mg/g)
直立Upright	11.80±0.30^a	16.96±0.63^a	2.25±0.06^b	1 892.26±58.49^b	0.46±0.03^a	0.53±0.03^b	9.52±0.30^b
一边倒 Lean to one side	10.62±0.06^b	15.01±0.22^b	3.85±0.58^a	4 868.52±28.73^a	0.21±0.01^b	0.60±0.02^a	12.76±0.44^a
均值 Mean value	11.21	15.99	3.05	3 380.39	0.34	0.56	11.14
标准差 Standard deviation	0.67	1.15	0.88	1 630.69	1.34	0.04	1.80
变异系数 Coefficient of variation	0.06	0.07	0.29	0.48	0.41	0.07	0.16

新疆北疆日光温室不同栽培模式下甜樱桃果实品质的差异性评价

Evaluation of fruit quality difference of sweet cherry under different cultivation modes in solar greenhouse in northern Xinjiang

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

指标 Indexes	主成分Principal component
指标 Indexes	1	2	3	4	5
单果重Single fruit weight	-0.584	-0.653	0.239	-0.381	0.175
纵径Vertical diameter	-0.543	-0.078	-0.763	0.343	0.015
横径Diameter	-0.207	0.559	-0.073	-0.219	-0.769
果形指数Fruit shape index	-0.449	-0.255	-0.702	0.397	0.288
硬度Hardness	-0.914	0.033	0.044	0.371	0.157
可食率Edible rate	0.431	-0.004	0.088	-0.871	0.218
L^*	0.863	-0.145	0.384	-0.021	-0.295
a^*	0.280	0.152	0.938	0.141	0.003
b^*	0.824	-0.406	0.055	0.276	0.278
可溶性固形物Soluble solids	-0.165	0.783	-0.136	0.544	0.213
可溶性糖Soluble sugar	-0.003	0.953	0.133	0.081	-0.26
总酸Total acid	-0.963	0.059	-0.048	0.248	0.072
葡萄糖Glucose	-0.200	-0.175	-0.137	-0.266	0.917
果糖Fructose	-0.212	0.952	0.185	0.019	-0.120
蔗糖Saccharose	0.257	0.934	0.078	-0.155	-0.178
糖酸比Sugar acid ratio	0.894	0.322	0.110	-0.243	-0.158
甜度值Sweetness value	0.008	0.986	0.119	-0.116	-0.030
VC	0.881	0.013	0.410	0.212	0.102
花色苷Anthocyanin	0.984	-0.098	-0.064	-0.121	0.064
类黄酮Flavonoid	-0.957	-0.022	-0.290	-0.004	-0.013
氨基酸Amino acid	-0.963	-0.005	-0.261	0.025	-0.063
单宁Tannin	0.922	0.115	0.346	-0.121	0.048
总酚Phenolics	-0.824	-0.306	-0.335	0.221	0.258
可溶性果胶Soluble pectin	0.918	-0.015	0.355	-0.17	-0.042
特征值Eigenvalue	12.719	5.998	2.107	1.653	1.523
贡献率 Contribution rate(%)	52.997	24.992	8.779	6.886	6.346
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution(%)	52.997	77.989	86.768	93.654	100.000

A目标层 Target layer	B约束层 Restraint layer	权重 Weight	C指标层 Standard layer	权重 Weight	综合权重 Comprehensive weight
适宜栽培模式 Suitable cultivation mode	B1外观品质	0.5	C1可食率	0.242	0.121
	B1外观品质	0.5	C2 a	0.150	0.075
	B2内在品质	0.5	C3甜度值	0.398	0.199
			C4总酸	0.136	0.068
			C5葡萄糖	0.074	0.037

[1]	胡莎莎, 邵丽萍, 陈丽华, 宋卫平, 赵海, 张新宇, 孙杰. 脱叶剂对机采棉棉铃发育及纤维品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 270-277.
[2]	刘跃, 连世昊, 李家豪, 王泓懿, 田文强, 聂凌帆, 孙刚刚, 贾永红, 石书兵, 于月华, 张金汕. 播期和密度对花生产量形成及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 278-285.
[3]	陆明昆, 李军宏, 尼陆排尔·于苏甫江, 潘喜鹏, 刘晓成, 张正贵, 潘占磊, 翟梦华, 张要朋, 赵文琪, 王丽宏, 王占彪. 追施硅肥对棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 286-293.
[4]	张腾艺, 李千里, 冯贝贝, 南坤, 闫鹏, 耿文娟. 金冠、维纳斯黄金、瑞雪苹果采收期的判定及果实品质的变化动态[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 314-323.
[5]	刘宜洋, 周鹏, 刘晶晶, 王晓敏, 胡新华, 付金军, 高艳明, 李建设. 103份番茄种质资源精简化栽培下遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 324-334.
[6]	李天乐, 白新禄, 安世杰, 郑强卿, 汤智辉, 支金虎. 水肥耦合对库尔勒香梨生长、果实品质及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 335-342.
[7]	尹美霖, 林敏娟, 井双泉, 熊仁次. 拉枝角度对骏枣光合特性和果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 343-349.
[8]	司艳娥, 如克艳木·买提司地克, 艾克拜尔·伊拉洪, 杨琪峰. 生物有机肥对枸杞品质及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 350-360.
[9]	叶朵朵, 孟新涛, 古丽米热·祖努纳, 阿比代姆·阿卜杜热伊木, 库尔班娜依·吐尔逊麦麦提, 张婷, 马燕, 潘俨. 非浓缩还原(NFC)枸杞汁加工过程中品质变化特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 361-372.
[10]	许莹月, 侯钰荣, 周晨烨, 王静, 李有政, 周齐, 兰吉勇, 柯梅, 魏鹏, 王玉祥. 紫花苜蓿与冰草混播当年对牧草品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 474-483.
[11]	郑培宇, 阿米妮古丽, 艾尔登巴图, 敖云巴特尔, 唐丽苹, 张彦威, 谢梦婉, 狄江, 于丽娟. 自然放牧条件下不同月龄巴音布鲁克羊肉品质的比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 494-501.
[12]	孙娜, 马林, 邹辉, 张志辉, 张胜军, 黄倩楠, 杨蕙, 登斯拉木·吐尔逊拜, 李志彬, 曹俊梅, 雷钧杰. 氮磷钾配施对冬小麦产量和品质的影响及其肥效分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 1-12.
[13]	陈慧, 张永强, 毕海燕, 谭军, 陈传信, 徐其江, 聂石辉, 于建新, 陆东, 雷钧杰. 不同春小麦品种在新疆旱作区产量形成的特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 13-20.
[14]	杜亚隆, 付秋萍, 艾鹏睿, 马英杰, 祁通, 潘洋. 综合评价不同灌溉处理对长绒棉生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 161-173.
[15]	唐丽苹, 阿米妮古丽, 王旭, 冯星, 郑培宇, 於建国, 张彦威, 谢梦婉, 狄江, 于丽娟. 罗布羊屠宰性能及肉品质特征分析与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 251-260.