Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 19-25.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.003
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Kang1(), REN Dan2, LIANG Weiwei3, PANG Bo1, MA Shangjie1, ZHANG Mengyuan1, GAO Wenwei1()
Received:
2023-04-13
Online:
2024-01-20
Published:
2024-02-21
Correspondence author:
GAO Wenwei(1973-),male,Xinjiang Shihezi,professor,research direction is crop genetics and breeding,(E-mail) Supported by:
赵康1(), 任丹2, 梁维维3, 庞博1, 马尚洁1, 张梦媛1, 高文伟1()
通讯作者:
高文伟(1973-),男,新疆石河子人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为作物遗传育种,(E-mail)作者简介:
赵康(1998-),男,新疆博乐人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物遗传育种,(E-mail)zhaokang07@yeah.net
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHAO Kang, REN Dan, LIANG Weiwei, PANG Bo, MA Shangjie, ZHANG Mengyuan, GAO Wenwei. Relationship between main agronomic traits and yield per plant of upland cotton reciprocal cross F2∶3 families[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 19-25.
赵康, 任丹, 梁维维, 庞博, 马尚洁, 张梦媛, 高文伟. 陆地棉正反交F2∶3家系主要农艺性状与单株皮棉产量的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 19-25.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.003
性状 Trait | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
亲本 Parents | 系9 | 49.33 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 11.00 | 10.00 | - | - | - |
徐州142 | 63.33 | 8.33 | 6.67 | 7.67 | 7.67 | 6.06 | 17.67 | 38.03 | |
徐州142 Xuzhou × 系9 Line 9 | 最小值 | 59.00 | 6.67 | 4.00 | 4.67 | 4.67 | 3.52 | 6.31 | 16.80 |
最大值 | 96.33 | 13.67 | 11.00 | 19.00 | 19.00 | 6.47 | 31.30 | 47.11 | |
均值 | 74.93 | 9.61 | 8.03 | 11.49 | 11.07 | 4.82 | 17.51 | 32.62 | |
标准差 | 7.45 | 1.15 | 1.45 | 3.24 | 3.13 | 0.63 | 6.34 | 5.21 | |
变异系数 CV(%) | 9.94 | 11.93 | 18.01 | 28.17 | 28.30 | 13.12 | 36.19 | 15.96 | |
系9 Line 9 × 徐州142 Xuzhou | 最小值 | 51.00 | 5.67 | 5.00 | 6.33 | 6.00 | 3.43 | 5.85 | 22.69 |
最大值 | 85.67 | 11.67 | 11.00 | 17.67 | 17.33 | 6.39 | 37.88 | 40.56 | |
均值 | 73.36 | 9.29 | 7.90 | 11.50 | 11.00 | 4.59 | 16.44 | 32.31 | |
标准差 | 6.58 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 3.02 | 2.87 | 0.59 | 5.56 | 3.57 | |
变异系数 CV(%) | 8.97 | 12.66 | 14.99 | 26.21 | 26.09 | 12.85 | 33.80 | 11.04 | |
t值t value | 1.45 | 1.73 | 0.62 | -0.04 | 0.15 | 2.43* | 1.16 | 0.44 |
Tab.1 Descriptive analysis of parents and F2∶3 families
性状 Trait | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
亲本 Parents | 系9 | 49.33 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 11.00 | 10.00 | - | - | - |
徐州142 | 63.33 | 8.33 | 6.67 | 7.67 | 7.67 | 6.06 | 17.67 | 38.03 | |
徐州142 Xuzhou × 系9 Line 9 | 最小值 | 59.00 | 6.67 | 4.00 | 4.67 | 4.67 | 3.52 | 6.31 | 16.80 |
最大值 | 96.33 | 13.67 | 11.00 | 19.00 | 19.00 | 6.47 | 31.30 | 47.11 | |
均值 | 74.93 | 9.61 | 8.03 | 11.49 | 11.07 | 4.82 | 17.51 | 32.62 | |
标准差 | 7.45 | 1.15 | 1.45 | 3.24 | 3.13 | 0.63 | 6.34 | 5.21 | |
变异系数 CV(%) | 9.94 | 11.93 | 18.01 | 28.17 | 28.30 | 13.12 | 36.19 | 15.96 | |
系9 Line 9 × 徐州142 Xuzhou | 最小值 | 51.00 | 5.67 | 5.00 | 6.33 | 6.00 | 3.43 | 5.85 | 22.69 |
最大值 | 85.67 | 11.67 | 11.00 | 17.67 | 17.33 | 6.39 | 37.88 | 40.56 | |
均值 | 73.36 | 9.29 | 7.90 | 11.50 | 11.00 | 4.59 | 16.44 | 32.31 | |
标准差 | 6.58 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 3.02 | 2.87 | 0.59 | 5.56 | 3.57 | |
变异系数 CV(%) | 8.97 | 12.66 | 14.99 | 26.21 | 26.09 | 12.85 | 33.80 | 11.04 | |
t值t value | 1.45 | 1.73 | 0.62 | -0.04 | 0.15 | 2.43* | 1.16 | 0.44 |
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 铃重 Boll weight | 单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant | 衣分 Lint percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 1 | |||||||
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.399** | 1 | ||||||
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | |||||
铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.372** | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | ||||
有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.392** | 0.372** | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | |||
铃重 Boll weight | 0.083 | 0.392** | 0.372** | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | ||
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant | 0.388** | 0.321** | 0.621** | 0.775** | 0.772** | 0.567** | 1 | |
衣分 Lint percentage | 0.150 | -0.053 | -0.042 | -0.012 | -0.028 | 0.406** | 0.480** | 1 |
Tab.2 Correlation analysis of phenotypic traits in F2:3 families
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 铃重 Boll weight | 单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant | 衣分 Lint percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 1 | |||||||
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.399** | 1 | ||||||
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | |||||
铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.372** | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | ||||
有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.392** | 0.372** | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | |||
铃重 Boll weight | 0.083 | 0.392** | 0.372** | 0.447** | 0.399** | 1 | ||
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant | 0.388** | 0.321** | 0.621** | 0.775** | 0.772** | 0.567** | 1 | |
衣分 Lint percentage | 0.150 | -0.053 | -0.042 | -0.012 | -0.028 | 0.406** | 0.480** | 1 |
自变量 Independent variable | 逐步回归模型 Stepwise regression model | R2 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
铃数Boll number per plant | LYPP=-0.64+1.486TBN | 0.598 | 249.355 | <0.001 |
铃数Boll number per plant、 铃重Boll weight | LYPP=-21.507+1.1.392TBN+4.782BW | 0.842 | 445.153 | <0.001 |
铃数Boll number per plant、 铃重Boll weight、衣分Lint percentage | LYPP=-30.357+1.427TBN+3.412BW+0.459LP | 0.942 | 901.896 | <0.001 |
铃重Boll weight、衣分Lint percentage、 有效铃数Effective boll number per | LYPP=-31.987+3.591BW+0.459LP+1.515EBN | 0.968 | 1 705.436 | <0.001 |
铃重Boll weight、衣分Lint percentage、 有效铃数Effective boll number per 有效果枝数Effective fruit branch | LYPP=-33.241+3.677BW+0.461LP+ 1.414EBN+0.294EFBN | 0.970 | 1 347.01 | <0.001 |
Tab.3 Multiple stepwise regression analysis of yield per plant and agronomic traits in F2∶3families
自变量 Independent variable | 逐步回归模型 Stepwise regression model | R2 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
铃数Boll number per plant | LYPP=-0.64+1.486TBN | 0.598 | 249.355 | <0.001 |
铃数Boll number per plant、 铃重Boll weight | LYPP=-21.507+1.1.392TBN+4.782BW | 0.842 | 445.153 | <0.001 |
铃数Boll number per plant、 铃重Boll weight、衣分Lint percentage | LYPP=-30.357+1.427TBN+3.412BW+0.459LP | 0.942 | 901.896 | <0.001 |
铃重Boll weight、衣分Lint percentage、 有效铃数Effective boll number per | LYPP=-31.987+3.591BW+0.459LP+1.515EBN | 0.968 | 1 705.436 | <0.001 |
铃重Boll weight、衣分Lint percentage、 有效铃数Effective boll number per 有效果枝数Effective fruit branch | LYPP=-33.241+3.677BW+0.461LP+ 1.414EBN+0.294EFBN | 0.970 | 1 347.01 | <0.001 |
自变量 Independent variable | 直接通 径系数 Direct path coefficient | 间接通径系数Indirect path coefficient | 间接综 合效应 Indirect combined effect | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果 枝数 Effective fruit branch | 铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 铃重 Boll weight | 衣分 Lint percentage | |||
株高Plant height | -0.007 | - | 0.007 | 0.025 | 0.010 | 0.269 | 0.032 | 0.052 | 0.395 |
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.018 | -0.003 | - | 0.034 | 0.011 | 0.273 | 0.006 | -0.019 | 0.303 |
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.055 | -0.003 | 0.011 | - | 0.021 | 0.531 | 0.021 | -0.015 | 0.566 |
铃数Boll number per plant | 0.028 | -0.003 | 0.007 | 0.041 | - | 0.669 | 0.038 | -0.004 | 0.747 |
有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.686 | -0.003 | 0.007 | 0.043 | 0.027 | - | 0.022 | -0.010 | 0.087 |
铃重Boll weight | 0.380 | -0.001 | 0.0003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.040 | - | 0.142 | 0.187 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.349 | -0.001 | -0.001 | -0.002 | 0.000 | -0.019 | 0.154 | - | 0.131 |
Tab.4 Path analysis of yield per plant and agronomic traits in F2∶3 families
自变量 Independent variable | 直接通 径系数 Direct path coefficient | 间接通径系数Indirect path coefficient | 间接综 合效应 Indirect combined effect | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果 枝数 Effective fruit branch | 铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 铃重 Boll weight | 衣分 Lint percentage | |||
株高Plant height | -0.007 | - | 0.007 | 0.025 | 0.010 | 0.269 | 0.032 | 0.052 | 0.395 |
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.018 | -0.003 | - | 0.034 | 0.011 | 0.273 | 0.006 | -0.019 | 0.303 |
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.055 | -0.003 | 0.011 | - | 0.021 | 0.531 | 0.021 | -0.015 | 0.566 |
铃数Boll number per plant | 0.028 | -0.003 | 0.007 | 0.041 | - | 0.669 | 0.038 | -0.004 | 0.747 |
有效铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.686 | -0.003 | 0.007 | 0.043 | 0.027 | - | 0.022 | -0.010 | 0.087 |
铃重Boll weight | 0.380 | -0.001 | 0.0003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.040 | - | 0.142 | 0.187 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.349 | -0.001 | -0.001 | -0.002 | 0.000 | -0.019 | 0.154 | - | 0.131 |
[1] | 李雪源, 王俊铎, 郑巨云, 等. 探索建立新疆全产业链增值的棉花产业发展模式[J]. 棉花科学, 2020, 42(5):20-25,29. |
LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo, ZHENG Juyun, et al. Exploring the development mode of cotton industry with the whole industrial chain value-added in Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2020, 42(5):20-25,29. | |
[2] | 杜雄明, 刘方, 王坤波, 等. 棉花种质资源收集鉴定与创新利用[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(S1):51-61. |
DU Xiongming, LIU Fang, WANG Kunbo, et al. Collection,identification and innovative utilization of cotton germplasm resources[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(S1):51-61. | |
[3] |
林建丽, 朱正歌, 高建伟. 植物杂种优势研究进展[J]. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(S2):46-56.
DOI |
LIN Jianli, ZHU Zhengge, GAO Jianwei. Research progress in plant heterosis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2009, 24(S2):46-56. | |
[4] |
刘定富, 尹合兴, 应继锋. 中国水稻百年育种的一些关键基因[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(2):1-11.
DOI |
LIU Dingfu, YIN Hexing, YING Jifeng. Key genes in century rice breeding in China[J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(2):1-11.
DOI |
|
[5] | 谷淇深. 棉花重要性状优异遗传位点挖掘与候选基因功能验证[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2021. |
GU Qishen. Extraction of excellent genetic loci for important traits and functional verification of Candidate Genes in Cotton[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2021. | |
[6] | 梅拥军, 郭伟锋, 熊仁次. 陆地棉产量组分对皮棉产量的遗传贡献分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2007,(2):114-118. |
MEI Yongjun, GUO Weifeng, XIONG Renci. Analysis of genetic contribution of upland cotton yield components to lint yield[J]. Cotton Science, 2007, 19(2):114-118. | |
[7] | 汤飞宇, 王晓芳, 莫旺成, 等. 高品质陆地棉农艺性状与皮棉产量的关系分析[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2009, 10(2):90-92. |
TANG Feiyu, WANG Xiaofang, MO Wangcheng, et al. Relationship between Agronomic Traits and lint Yield of high quality upland cotton[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2009, 10(2):90-92. | |
[8] | 朱协飞, 司占峰. 10个棉花两系材料的主要性状与皮棉产量灰色关联分析[J]. 棉花科学, 2017, 39(2):24-28. |
ZHU Xiefei, SI Zhanfeng. Grey correlation analysis of main characters and lint yield of 10 cotton two-series materials[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2017, 39(2):24-28. | |
[9] | 张华崇, 赵树琪, 闫振华, 等. 棉花正反交F1代产量和纤维品质性状比较分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(S1):57-58,67. |
ZHANG Huachong, ZHAO Shuqi, YAN Zhenhua, et al. Comparative analysis of yield and fiber quality characters in F1 generation of cotton[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 60(S1):57-58,67. | |
[10] | 王志伟, 胡根海, 林丽婷, 等. 外源抗虫基因对杂交棉正反交的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(5):1048-1049. |
WANG Zhiwei, HU Genhai, LIN Liting, et al. Effects of exogenous insect resistance genes on cross-pollination of hybrid cotton[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 49(5):1048-1049. | |
[11] | 郭衍龙, 聂以春, 郝三辉, 等. 华杂棉H318 F2杂种优势及F1正反交差异比较[J]. 中国棉花, 2012, 39(11):19-21. |
GUO Yanlong, NIE Yichun, HAO Sanhui, et al. Heterosis of H318 F2 and cross-crossing Difference of F1 in Huaza cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2012, 39(11):19-21. | |
[12] | 郭衍龙. 杂交棉正反交F1杂种优势、F2利用价值及制种效率研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2012. |
GUO Yanlong. Study on heterosis of F1,utilization value of F2 and seed production efficiency of hybrid cotton[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2012. | |
[13] | 王伟, 崔秀珍, 李哲. 棉花海陆杂交种主要性状的遗传相关分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009,(3):51-53. |
WANG Wei, CUI Xiuzhen, LI Zhe. Genetic correlation analysis of main characters of sea-land hybrid in cotton[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2009,(3):51-53. | |
[14] | 冯文林, 陈全家, 曲延英. 棉花海陆棉杂交后代农艺与纤维品质性状相关性研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(3):393-401. |
FENG Wenlin, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Study on the correlation between agronomy and fiber quality traits of hybrid progeny of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(3):393-401. | |
[15] |
张凯, 鲁宁宁, 陈伟, 等. 棉花杂交组合F1、F2高产优质性状分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(10):22-27.
DOI |
ZHANG Kai, LU Ningning, CHEN Wei, et al. Analysis of high yield and high quality characters of F1 and F2 cotton Hybrids[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(10):22-27. | |
[16] | 任丹. 棉花不同杂交类型后代产量性状与品质性状遗传分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021. |
REN Dan. Genetic analysis of yield characters and quality characters of different hybrid types of cotton[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021. | |
[17] |
付鸿博, 王鹏飞, 徐豆, 等. 农大4号与DS-1欧李正、反交F1代果实品质的遗传变异分析[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(10):2223-2233.
DOI |
FU Hongbo, WANG Pengfei, XU Dou, et al. Analysis on Genetic Variation of Fruit quality of F1 generation of Direct and Reverse crossing between Nongda No. 4 and DS-1[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 2021, 35(10):2223-2233. | |
[18] | 顾相蕊, 姚曲峋, 赵世春, 等. 长江流域杂交棉主要农艺性状与产量和品质的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(23):5297-5300. |
GU Xiangrui, YAO Qujin, ZHAO Shichun, et al. Relationship between Main agronomic characters and yield and quality of hybrid cotton in Yangtze River Basin[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 51(23):5297-5300. | |
[19] | 吴殿廷, 吴迪. 用主成分分析法作多指标综合评价应该注意的问题[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2015, 45(20):143-150. |
WU Dianting, WU Di. Problems that should be paid attention to in multi-index comprehensive evaluation by principal component analysis[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Understanding, 2015, 45(20):143-150. | |
[20] | 罗海华, 邵德意, 陈功, 等. 陆地棉常规品种(系)与杂交组合性状相关性的比较分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017,(5):31-37. |
LUO Haihua, SHAO Deyi, CHEN Gong, et al. Comparative analysis of correlation between characters of upland cotton conventional varieties(lines) and hybrid combinations[J]. Crops, 2017,(5):31-37. | |
[21] | 李慧琴, 于娅, 王鹏, 等. 270份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状与品质性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(4):903-910. |
LI Huiqin, YU Ya, WANG Peng, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic and quality traits of 270 upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(4):903-910. |
[1] | WANG Hui, GUO Jincheng, SONG Jia, ZHANG Tingjun, He Liangrong. Physiological and biochemical analysis of transgenic offspring of upland cotton GhCIPK6 under high temperature Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119. |
[2] | FENG Mei, LIU Chaoqin, CHEN Jie, LIU Wenlong, YANG Zhigang, TIAN Jieying, HUANG Xin. Analysis of character variation and heterosis of F1 generation of different crosses in wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1858-1865. |
[3] | SANG Zhiwei, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, CHEN Quanjia. Analysis of mechanical harvesting characters of germplasm resources of different upland cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098. |
[4] | CHEN Liangliang, ZHANG Meng, GUO Liping, QI Tingxiang, ZHANG Xuexian, TANG Huini, WANG Hailin, QIAO Xiuqin, WU Jianyong, XING Chaozhu. Heterosis Performance and Their Parental Combining Ability Analysis of F1 and F2 Hybrids of Upland Cotton at Seedling Stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 261-271. |
[5] | Alibieligen Hazitai, Hanipa Hazaisi, Zulehumaer Wusimanjiang, YAO Qing, Shouhereti Yodika, HOU Xanfei, LI Qiang, ZHANG Zheng. Adaptability Analysis of Introduced Soybean Varieties in Yili Valley of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 326-335. |
[6] | LONG Tianyu, DENG Yahui, ZU Qianli, YANG Long, QU Yanying, CHEN Quanjia. Identification and Evaluation of Indoor Resistance to Cotton Fusarium wilt at Seedling Stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 416-423. |
[7] | DUAN Yanyan, HU Jing, QI Bingqin, PAN Zhiyuan, WU Haonan, GOU Ling. Response of reciprocal cross to lodging resistance and planting density of maize hybrids [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2949-2961. |
[8] | HU Wenran, ZHAO Zhun, SHAO Wukui, HUANG Quansheng. Identification of TCP family and analysis of tissue expression in upland cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2627-2637. |
[9] | XIAO Zhonglin, YAN Huizhuan, GAO Jie, WANG Siyi, ZHANG Xuxu, Ailixire Nijiati. Effects of Different Concentrations of NaCl and NaHCO3 Stress on Diurnal Changes of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Dried Pepper [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 140-149. |
[10] | ZHANG Yanfei, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, JIA Pingping, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, ZHOU Long, HAO Qing. Comparison of Phenotypic and Photosynthetic Differences between Saimisu 1 Jujube and Its Budding [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 69-78. |
[11] | HAN Yi, ZHAO Baolong, SUN Junli, ZHAO Shucheng. Study on Leaf Characters and Diurnal Variation of Photosynthesis of Excellent Single Plant of Xinjiang Peach [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2170-2178. |
[12] | NIU Qian, ZHANG Wen, HAN Shouan, WANG Min, WANG Wenyong, FENG Fuji, WANG Huan, GONG Jiaqi, LI Jiaying, TIAN Jia, XIE Hui. Effects of High Temperature Stress on Photosynthetic and Fluorescence Characteristics of Centennial Seedless and Wuhe Cuibao Grape Leaves [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1919-1928. |
[13] | MA Xiaomei, LI Baocheng, DONG Chengguan, ZHOU Xiaofeng, WANG Xin, TIAN Qin, ZHAO Suqing, WANG Gang. Correlation between Leaf Morphological Indexes and Defoliation Regularity of Early-maturing Upland Cotton Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1301-1311. |
[14] | MAO Tingyong, KONG Jie, HU Shoulin, ZHANG Wei, CHEN Jialin, LI Yanfang, WAN Sumei, CHEN Guodong. Morphological Comparison of Fiber Development in Different Upland Cotton Varieties in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 279-290. |
[15] | YANG Yanlong, MA Jun, SHI Weijun. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Phenotypic Characters of Upland Cotton Germplasm Resources Imported [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 310-319. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||