Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 9-18.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.002
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
OUYANG Danhua1(), ZHAO Kang1, SONG Dongbo1, LIU Ziqing1, GUO Wangzhen2, LIU Yan3, GU Aixing1(), Azhatiguli Maimaitituer1, Alikaerjiang Amaier1
Received:
2023-05-11
Online:
2024-01-20
Published:
2024-02-21
Correspondence author:
GU Aixing(1973-),female,Urumqi,Xinjiang,professor,doctoral supervisor,research direction is plant genetics and breeding,(E-mail) Supported by:
欧阳单华1(), 赵康1, 宋东博1, 柳自清1, 郭旺珍2, 刘燕3, 顾爱星1(), 阿扎提古丽·麦麦提图尔1, 艾力卡尔江·艾麦尔1
通讯作者:
顾爱星(1973-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为作物遗传育种,(E-mail)作者简介:
欧阳单华(1997-),女,新疆昌吉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物病理,(E-mail)1468409242@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
OUYANG Danhua, ZHAO Kang, SONG Dongbo, LIU Ziqing, GUO Wangzhen, LIU Yan, GU Aixing, Azhatiguli Maimaitituer, Alikaerjiang Amaier. Identification and comprehensive analysis of Verticillium wilt resistance in 35 cotton strains[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 9-18.
欧阳单华, 赵康, 宋东博, 柳自清, 郭旺珍, 刘燕, 顾爱星, 阿扎提古丽·麦麦提图尔, 艾力卡尔江·艾麦尔. 35份棉花品系对黄萎病抗性鉴定及综合分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 9-18.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.002
编号 Number | 棉花品系 Variety | 相对病指 Disease index | 反应型 Reaction type | 编号 Number | 棉花品系 Variety | 相对病指 Disease index | 反应型 Reaction type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4-13 | 13.5 | R | 19 | 37-101-3 | 45 | S |
2 | 4-22 | 18 | R | 20 | 37-109-2 | 31.5 | T |
3 | 4-8-2-1 | 58.5 | S | 21 | 37-129-3 | 22.5 | T |
4 | 4-14-3-5 | 22.5 | T | 22 | 37-16 | 36 | S |
5 | 4-15-3-3 | 22.5 | T | 23 | 37-172-7 | 27 | T |
6 | 4-2-3-2 | 27 | T | 24 | 37-179-3 | 31.5 | T |
7 | 4-18-3-1 | 27 | T | 25 | 37-59-6 | 31.5 | T |
8 | 4-18 | 67.5 | S | 26 | 37-68 | 27 | T |
9 | 4-20-2 | 27 | T | 27 | 37-85-6 | 40.5 | S |
10 | 4-2-7-3 | 18 | R | 28 | 37-116-3 | 27 | T |
11 | 4-8-2-7 | 54 | S | 29 | 37-94-5 | 63 | S |
12 | 10Q-11-2 | 31.5 | T | 30 | 44-17-8 | 58.5 | S |
13 | 10Q-33-3 | 31.5 | T | 31 | 44-8-1 | 36 | S |
14 | 10Q-44 | 67.5 | S | 32 | CQJ-5 | 22.5 | T |
15 | 10Q-67 | 54 | S | 33 | CQJ-5Z2 | 31.5 | T |
16 | 10Q-67-3 | 13.5 | R | 34 | CQJ-5Z6 | 54 | S |
17 | 10Q-69 | 31.5 | T | 35 | CQJ-5Z7 | 49.5 | S |
18 | 37-101-5 | 63 | S |
Tab.1 Identification of Verticillium wilt resistance in different cotton varieties
编号 Number | 棉花品系 Variety | 相对病指 Disease index | 反应型 Reaction type | 编号 Number | 棉花品系 Variety | 相对病指 Disease index | 反应型 Reaction type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4-13 | 13.5 | R | 19 | 37-101-3 | 45 | S |
2 | 4-22 | 18 | R | 20 | 37-109-2 | 31.5 | T |
3 | 4-8-2-1 | 58.5 | S | 21 | 37-129-3 | 22.5 | T |
4 | 4-14-3-5 | 22.5 | T | 22 | 37-16 | 36 | S |
5 | 4-15-3-3 | 22.5 | T | 23 | 37-172-7 | 27 | T |
6 | 4-2-3-2 | 27 | T | 24 | 37-179-3 | 31.5 | T |
7 | 4-18-3-1 | 27 | T | 25 | 37-59-6 | 31.5 | T |
8 | 4-18 | 67.5 | S | 26 | 37-68 | 27 | T |
9 | 4-20-2 | 27 | T | 27 | 37-85-6 | 40.5 | S |
10 | 4-2-7-3 | 18 | R | 28 | 37-116-3 | 27 | T |
11 | 4-8-2-7 | 54 | S | 29 | 37-94-5 | 63 | S |
12 | 10Q-11-2 | 31.5 | T | 30 | 44-17-8 | 58.5 | S |
13 | 10Q-33-3 | 31.5 | T | 31 | 44-8-1 | 36 | S |
14 | 10Q-44 | 67.5 | S | 32 | CQJ-5 | 22.5 | T |
15 | 10Q-67 | 54 | S | 33 | CQJ-5Z2 | 31.5 | T |
16 | 10Q-67-3 | 13.5 | R | 34 | CQJ-5Z6 | 54 | S |
17 | 10Q-69 | 31.5 | T | 35 | CQJ-5Z7 | 49.5 | S |
18 | 37-101-5 | 63 | S |
性状 Traits | 极小值 Minimum | 极大值 Maximum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 39.60 | 94.00 | 68.13 | 14.44 | 21.20 |
始节高Height of the first branch | 9.64 | 20.40 | 15.12 | 2.89 | 19.14 |
果枝数Fruit branch number | 6.20 | 16.00 | 10.46 | 2.46 | 23.53 |
有效果枝数Effective fruit branch | 4.57 | 13.33 | 8.12 | 2.30 | 28.34 |
铃数The boll number | 5.14 | 24.33 | 12.41 | 5.35 | 43.10 |
有效铃数Effective boll number | 4.29 | 22.67 | 10.74 | 4.52 | 42.12 |
单铃重Bell weight | 2.42 | 6.19 | 4.29 | 0.85 | 19.83 |
衣分Lint percentage | 26.16 | 46.43 | 34.06 | 4.05 | 11.90 |
单株皮棉重Lint yield per plant | 3.32 | 16.59 | 9.67 | 3.34 | 34.48 |
单株籽棉重Seed cotton yield per plant | 10.46 | 51.20 | 28.36 | 9.18 | 32.37 |
相对病情指数Relative disease index | 13.50 | 67.50 | 36.64 | 16.01 | 43.69 |
上半部平均长度Upper half mean length | 24.27 | 35.50 | 28.79 | 1.92 | 6.68 |
整齐度Uniformity index | 80.77 | 87.40 | 83.56 | 1.40 | 1.67 |
强度Fiber strength | 24.00 | 45.20 | 28.68 | 3.50 | 12.21 |
伸长率Elongation ratio | 7.30 | 13.50 | 9.74 | 1.38 | 14.12 |
短纤维指数Short fiber index | 3.20 | 10.00 | 7.51 | 1.58 | 20.99 |
纺纱均匀性指数Spinning consistency index | 93.00 | 196.00 | 132.05 | 18.33 | 13.88 |
马克隆值Micronaire | 2.71 | 5.83 | 4.15 | 0.61 | 14.66 |
Tab.2 Descriptive statistics of different cotton varieties strain
性状 Traits | 极小值 Minimum | 极大值 Maximum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 39.60 | 94.00 | 68.13 | 14.44 | 21.20 |
始节高Height of the first branch | 9.64 | 20.40 | 15.12 | 2.89 | 19.14 |
果枝数Fruit branch number | 6.20 | 16.00 | 10.46 | 2.46 | 23.53 |
有效果枝数Effective fruit branch | 4.57 | 13.33 | 8.12 | 2.30 | 28.34 |
铃数The boll number | 5.14 | 24.33 | 12.41 | 5.35 | 43.10 |
有效铃数Effective boll number | 4.29 | 22.67 | 10.74 | 4.52 | 42.12 |
单铃重Bell weight | 2.42 | 6.19 | 4.29 | 0.85 | 19.83 |
衣分Lint percentage | 26.16 | 46.43 | 34.06 | 4.05 | 11.90 |
单株皮棉重Lint yield per plant | 3.32 | 16.59 | 9.67 | 3.34 | 34.48 |
单株籽棉重Seed cotton yield per plant | 10.46 | 51.20 | 28.36 | 9.18 | 32.37 |
相对病情指数Relative disease index | 13.50 | 67.50 | 36.64 | 16.01 | 43.69 |
上半部平均长度Upper half mean length | 24.27 | 35.50 | 28.79 | 1.92 | 6.68 |
整齐度Uniformity index | 80.77 | 87.40 | 83.56 | 1.40 | 1.67 |
强度Fiber strength | 24.00 | 45.20 | 28.68 | 3.50 | 12.21 |
伸长率Elongation ratio | 7.30 | 13.50 | 9.74 | 1.38 | 14.12 |
短纤维指数Short fiber index | 3.20 | 10.00 | 7.51 | 1.58 | 20.99 |
纺纱均匀性指数Spinning consistency index | 93.00 | 196.00 | 132.05 | 18.33 | 13.88 |
马克隆值Micronaire | 2.71 | 5.83 | 4.15 | 0.61 | 14.66 |
性状 Traits | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 0.842 | 0.188 | 0.244 | 0.132 | 0.184 |
始节高Height of the first branch | 0.093 | -0.204 | 0.640 | 0.239 | 0.420 |
果枝数Fruit branch number | 0.779 | 0.451 | -0.087 | 0.056 | 0.071 |
有效果枝数Effective fruit branch | 0.833 | 0.390 | -0.034 | -0.011 | 0.193 |
铃数The boll number | 0.877 | 0.352 | 0.054 | -0.083 | 0.010 |
有效铃数Effective boll number | 0.886 | 0.285 | 0.137 | -0.115 | -0.020 |
单铃重Bell weight | 0.044 | -0.036 | 0.716 | -0.038 | -0.393 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.092 | -0.163 | 0.899 | 0.048 | -0.155 |
单株皮棉重Lint yield per plant | 0.312 | -0.027 | 0.861 | 0.077 | -0.220 |
单株籽棉重Seed cotton yield per plant | -0.486 | -0.502 | 0.287 | -0.133 | 0.165 |
相对病情指数Relative disease index | -0.033 | 0.185 | -0.083 | 0.489 | 0.435 |
上半部平均长度Upper half mean length | -0.470 | 0.758 | 0.100 | -0.111 | -0.163 |
整齐度Uniformity index | -0.513 | 0.339 | 0.322 | 0.524 | 0.036 |
强度Fiber strength | -0.431 | 0.621 | 0.153 | -0.420 | 0.303 |
伸长率Elongation ratio | 0.089 | 0.020 | -0.437 | 0.659 | -0.346 |
短纤维指数Short fiber index | 0.663 | -0.398 | -0.282 | -0.171 | -0.196 |
纺纱均匀性指数Spinning consistency index | -0.534 | 0.806 | 0.180 | -0.056 | 0.040 |
马克隆值Micronaire | 0.129 | -0.767 | 0.123 | -0.063 | 0.361 |
特征根Characteristic value | 5.334 | 3.423 | 3.105 | 1.298 | 1.105 |
贡献率Contributions rate(%) | 29.636 | 19.019 | 17.249 | 7.214 | 6.141 |
累积贡献率Accumulative contributions rate(%) | 29.636 | 48.655 | 65.904 | 73.118 | 79.259 |
Tab.3 Principal component analysis of 35 cotton strains
性状 Traits | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 0.842 | 0.188 | 0.244 | 0.132 | 0.184 |
始节高Height of the first branch | 0.093 | -0.204 | 0.640 | 0.239 | 0.420 |
果枝数Fruit branch number | 0.779 | 0.451 | -0.087 | 0.056 | 0.071 |
有效果枝数Effective fruit branch | 0.833 | 0.390 | -0.034 | -0.011 | 0.193 |
铃数The boll number | 0.877 | 0.352 | 0.054 | -0.083 | 0.010 |
有效铃数Effective boll number | 0.886 | 0.285 | 0.137 | -0.115 | -0.020 |
单铃重Bell weight | 0.044 | -0.036 | 0.716 | -0.038 | -0.393 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.092 | -0.163 | 0.899 | 0.048 | -0.155 |
单株皮棉重Lint yield per plant | 0.312 | -0.027 | 0.861 | 0.077 | -0.220 |
单株籽棉重Seed cotton yield per plant | -0.486 | -0.502 | 0.287 | -0.133 | 0.165 |
相对病情指数Relative disease index | -0.033 | 0.185 | -0.083 | 0.489 | 0.435 |
上半部平均长度Upper half mean length | -0.470 | 0.758 | 0.100 | -0.111 | -0.163 |
整齐度Uniformity index | -0.513 | 0.339 | 0.322 | 0.524 | 0.036 |
强度Fiber strength | -0.431 | 0.621 | 0.153 | -0.420 | 0.303 |
伸长率Elongation ratio | 0.089 | 0.020 | -0.437 | 0.659 | -0.346 |
短纤维指数Short fiber index | 0.663 | -0.398 | -0.282 | -0.171 | -0.196 |
纺纱均匀性指数Spinning consistency index | -0.534 | 0.806 | 0.180 | -0.056 | 0.040 |
马克隆值Micronaire | 0.129 | -0.767 | 0.123 | -0.063 | 0.361 |
特征根Characteristic value | 5.334 | 3.423 | 3.105 | 1.298 | 1.105 |
贡献率Contributions rate(%) | 29.636 | 19.019 | 17.249 | 7.214 | 6.141 |
累积贡献率Accumulative contributions rate(%) | 29.636 | 48.655 | 65.904 | 73.118 | 79.259 |
序号 Number | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | F-value | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.372 | -1.696 | 0.510 | -0.813 | -0.239 | 0.125 | 14 |
2 | 0.882 | -1.768 | -0.211 | 1.518 | 0.649 | 0.048 | 17 |
3 | 0.979 | 0.967 | -0.564 | 2.108 | -1.363 | 0.562 | 5 |
4 | -0.976 | -0.569 | 0.499 | 1.263 | 0.220 | -0.261 | 24 |
5 | -1.521 | -1.513 | -1.520 | -0.447 | -1.374 | -1.410 | 35 |
6 | -0.088 | -0.045 | 1.060 | -0.835 | -1.335 | 0.009 | 19 |
7 | -0.165 | 0.089 | 1.245 | -1.315 | 0.054 | 0.115 | 15 |
8 | 0.600 | 1.744 | -0.792 | -1.667 | 0.638 | 0.368 | 7 |
9 | -1.338 | -0.776 | -0.733 | -0.376 | -0.818 | -0.944 | 34 |
10 | -1.403 | -0.048 | 1.878 | 1.341 | 2.020 | 0.151 | 13 |
11 | 0.284 | 0.277 | -1.771 | -1.350 | -0.820 | -0.399 | 30 |
12 | 0.012 | -0.902 | -0.981 | -0.679 | -0.073 | -0.493 | 32 |
13 | -0.296 | 0.307 | 0.970 | -1.407 | -0.888 | -0.022 | 20 |
14 | 0.403 | 1.295 | -1.503 | 0.597 | 0.223 | 0.205 | 10 |
15 | -1.385 | 1.239 | -0.672 | 0.234 | -1.687 | -0.476 | 31 |
16 | -0.494 | -1.209 | 0.660 | 0.462 | -1.283 | -0.388 | 29 |
17 | 3.591 | -0.757 | 0.856 | -0.147 | 0.163 | 1.347 | 1 |
18 | 0.771 | 1.482 | -0.328 | 1.558 | 1.527 | 0.832 | 2 |
19 | 1.778 | 0.207 | -0.017 | -0.535 | -0.708 | 0.608 | 4 |
20 | -0.372 | -0.237 | 0.030 | -1.033 | 1.944 | -0.134 | 23 |
21 | 0.548 | 0.120 | 2.280 | 0.327 | -1.676 | 0.632 | 3 |
22 | 0.422 | -0.084 | 0.135 | 0.425 | -0.434 | 0.172 | 11 |
23 | -1.146 | 0.413 | 1.466 | -0.434 | 0.338 | -0.023 | 22 |
24 | -0.041 | -1.331 | -1.673 | 0.262 | 1.131 | -0.589 | 33 |
25 | -0.241 | -0.982 | -1.027 | 1.951 | -0.026 | -0.374 | 28 |
26 | -0.529 | -0.064 | 0.947 | -0.071 | 1.243 | 0.083 | 16 |
27 | -0.220 | 0.488 | 0.179 | -1.079 | 0.647 | 0.026 | 18 |
28 | -0.976 | -0.245 | 0.429 | 0.181 | 0.225 | -0.297 | 25 |
29 | -0.104 | 1.804 | -0.277 | -0.223 | 0.307 | 0.337 | 8 |
30 | 0.409 | 1.293 | -0.338 | 0.212 | 0.232 | 0.427 | 6 |
31 | -0.165 | -0.419 | -0.808 | -1.459 | 1.750 | -0.337 | 27 |
32 | -0.092 | -0.637 | 0.675 | 0.018 | 0.200 | -0.023 | 21 |
33 | -0.063 | -0.691 | -0.603 | -0.116 | -0.050 | -0.335 | 26 |
34 | -0.561 | 1.640 | 0.463 | 0.706 | -0.692 | 0.296 | 9 |
35 | 0.123 | 0.610 | -0.467 | 0.823 | -0.045 | 0.162 | 12 |
Tab.4 Comprehensive scores and ranking of 35 cotton strains
序号 Number | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | F-value | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.372 | -1.696 | 0.510 | -0.813 | -0.239 | 0.125 | 14 |
2 | 0.882 | -1.768 | -0.211 | 1.518 | 0.649 | 0.048 | 17 |
3 | 0.979 | 0.967 | -0.564 | 2.108 | -1.363 | 0.562 | 5 |
4 | -0.976 | -0.569 | 0.499 | 1.263 | 0.220 | -0.261 | 24 |
5 | -1.521 | -1.513 | -1.520 | -0.447 | -1.374 | -1.410 | 35 |
6 | -0.088 | -0.045 | 1.060 | -0.835 | -1.335 | 0.009 | 19 |
7 | -0.165 | 0.089 | 1.245 | -1.315 | 0.054 | 0.115 | 15 |
8 | 0.600 | 1.744 | -0.792 | -1.667 | 0.638 | 0.368 | 7 |
9 | -1.338 | -0.776 | -0.733 | -0.376 | -0.818 | -0.944 | 34 |
10 | -1.403 | -0.048 | 1.878 | 1.341 | 2.020 | 0.151 | 13 |
11 | 0.284 | 0.277 | -1.771 | -1.350 | -0.820 | -0.399 | 30 |
12 | 0.012 | -0.902 | -0.981 | -0.679 | -0.073 | -0.493 | 32 |
13 | -0.296 | 0.307 | 0.970 | -1.407 | -0.888 | -0.022 | 20 |
14 | 0.403 | 1.295 | -1.503 | 0.597 | 0.223 | 0.205 | 10 |
15 | -1.385 | 1.239 | -0.672 | 0.234 | -1.687 | -0.476 | 31 |
16 | -0.494 | -1.209 | 0.660 | 0.462 | -1.283 | -0.388 | 29 |
17 | 3.591 | -0.757 | 0.856 | -0.147 | 0.163 | 1.347 | 1 |
18 | 0.771 | 1.482 | -0.328 | 1.558 | 1.527 | 0.832 | 2 |
19 | 1.778 | 0.207 | -0.017 | -0.535 | -0.708 | 0.608 | 4 |
20 | -0.372 | -0.237 | 0.030 | -1.033 | 1.944 | -0.134 | 23 |
21 | 0.548 | 0.120 | 2.280 | 0.327 | -1.676 | 0.632 | 3 |
22 | 0.422 | -0.084 | 0.135 | 0.425 | -0.434 | 0.172 | 11 |
23 | -1.146 | 0.413 | 1.466 | -0.434 | 0.338 | -0.023 | 22 |
24 | -0.041 | -1.331 | -1.673 | 0.262 | 1.131 | -0.589 | 33 |
25 | -0.241 | -0.982 | -1.027 | 1.951 | -0.026 | -0.374 | 28 |
26 | -0.529 | -0.064 | 0.947 | -0.071 | 1.243 | 0.083 | 16 |
27 | -0.220 | 0.488 | 0.179 | -1.079 | 0.647 | 0.026 | 18 |
28 | -0.976 | -0.245 | 0.429 | 0.181 | 0.225 | -0.297 | 25 |
29 | -0.104 | 1.804 | -0.277 | -0.223 | 0.307 | 0.337 | 8 |
30 | 0.409 | 1.293 | -0.338 | 0.212 | 0.232 | 0.427 | 6 |
31 | -0.165 | -0.419 | -0.808 | -1.459 | 1.750 | -0.337 | 27 |
32 | -0.092 | -0.637 | 0.675 | 0.018 | 0.200 | -0.023 | 21 |
33 | -0.063 | -0.691 | -0.603 | -0.116 | -0.050 | -0.335 | 26 |
34 | -0.561 | 1.640 | 0.463 | 0.706 | -0.692 | 0.296 | 9 |
35 | 0.123 | 0.610 | -0.467 | 0.823 | -0.045 | 0.162 | 12 |
[1] | 史晓玲. 国家、生态、技术、市场:棉花与鲁西北社会变迁(1906-2006)[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2020. |
SHI Xiaoling. Country,Ecology,Technology and Market:Cotton and Social changes in North west Shandong(1906-2006)[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2020. | |
[2] | 吴方卫, 张锦华. 丝绸之路经济带农牧业合作的空间、潜力与中国农业“走出去”策略[J]. 科学发展, 2016,(4):76-81. |
WU Fangwei, ZHANG Jinhua. The space and potential of agricultural and animal husbandry cooperation along the Silk Road economic belt and the strategy of China's agricultural "going global"[J]. Science Development, 2016,(4):76-81. | |
[3] | 白红燕. 枯草芽孢杆菌EBS03防治棉花黄萎病效果评测及培养条件优化[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022. |
BAI Hongyan. Effect evaluation and culture condition optimization of bacillus subtilis EBS03 against Verticillium wilt of cotton[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022. | |
[4] | Tian J, Zhang X, Liang B, et al. Expression of baculovirus anti-apoptotic genes p35 and op-iap in cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) enhances tolerance to verticillium wilt[J]. Plos One, 2010, 5(12):e14218. |
[5] |
Gong Q, Yang Z E, Wang X Q, et al. Salicylic acid-related cotton(Gossypium arboreum) ribosomal protein GaRPL18 contributes to resistance to Verticillium dahliae[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2017, 17(1):59.
DOI URL |
[6] | 贾子昉, 赵海红, 李成奇, 等. 棉花种质资源遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2014, 42(1):16-20. |
JIA Zifang, ZHAO Haihong, LI Chengqi, et al. Research progress on genetic diversity of cotton germplasm resources[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(1):16-20. | |
[7] |
ZENG L H, Wilson, Bourland. Editorial:trends in cotton breeding:meeting the challenges of the 21st century[J]. Frontiers in Plant science, 2022, 13:1019956.
DOI URL |
[8] |
喻树迅, 范术丽, 王寒涛, 等. 中国棉花高产育种研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(18):3465-3476.
DOI |
YU Shuxun, FAN Shuli, WANG Hantao, et al. Research progress on high yield breeding of cotton in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(18):3465-3476.
DOI |
|
[9] | 李雪瑞, 刘宁, 王永刚, 等. 新疆60份引进陆地棉资源主要性状的遗传差异分析[J]. 棉花科学, 2022, 44(1):15-23. |
LI Xuerui, LIU Ning, WANG Yonggang, et al. Genetic difference analysis of main traits of 60 upland cotton cultivars in Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Science, 2022, 44(1):15-23. | |
[10] | 李有忠, 赵曾强, 王志军, 等. 基于陆地棉种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 48(4):394-400. |
LI Youzhong, ZHAO Zengqiang, WANG Zhijun, et al. Genetic diversity analysis based on phenotypic traits of upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Science), 2022, 48(4):394-400. | |
[11] | 庄生仁, 任福成, 詹有俊, 等. 黄萎病发病程度对棉花产量及其构成因素的影响效应[J]. 中国棉花, 1999,(3):19-22. |
ZHUANG Shengren, REN Fucheng, ZHAN Youjun, et al. Effect of pathogenetic degree of Verticillium Wilt on cotton yield and its component factors[J]. China Cotton, 1999,(3):19-22. | |
[12] | 顾爱星, 张翠芳, 曲延英, 等. 不同棉花品种(系)的黄萎病抗性及其与经济性状的相关性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(11):58-63. |
GU Aixing, ZHANG Cuifang, QU Yanying, et al. Correlation between verticillium wilt resistance and economic traits of different cotton varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2010, 19(11):58-63. | |
[13] | 万刚. 黄萎病对棉花产量和品质的影响及棉花品种抗病性研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2017. |
WANG Gang. Effect of Verticillium wilt on yield and quality of cotton and study on resistance of cotton varieties[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2017. | |
[14] | 郭宝生, 王凯辉, 刘素恩, 等. 陆地棉品种和骨干品系黄萎病抗性鉴定[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014, 15(2):389-393. |
GUO Baosheng, WANG Kaihui, LIU Suen, et al. Identification of Verticillium wilt resistance in upland cotton cultivars and backbone lines[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2014, 15(2):389-393.
DOI |
|
[15] |
Yuan Y C, Xing H X, Zeng W G, et al. Genome-wide association and differential expression analysis of salt tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum L at the germination stage[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1):394.
DOI PMID |
[16] | 孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利, 等. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(8):2667-2675. |
MENG Qingli, GUAN Zhoubo, FENG Baili, et al. Principal components and fuzzy cluster analysis of drought-resistant traits in millet[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(8):2667-2675. | |
[17] |
韩丽萍, 郭卫卫, 韩晓凡, 等. 利用SOM聚类分析及主成分分析方法鉴定小麦品种萌发期耐盐性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(24):6-17.
DOI |
HAN Liping, GUO Weiwei, HAN Xiaofan, et al. Identification of salt tolerance of wheat varieties at germination stage by SOM cluster analysis and principal component analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(24):6-17. | |
[18] |
孙东雷, 卞能飞, 王幸, 等. 高油酸花生萌发期耐冷性综合评价及种质筛选[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(6):1263-1272.
DOI |
SUN Donglei, BIAN Nengfei, WANG Xing, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of cold tolerance and germplasm screening of peanut with high oleic acid at germination stage[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(6):1263-1272.
DOI |
|
[19] |
李兴河, 王海涛, 刘存敬, 等. 80份棉花种质资源的育种应用价值评价[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(11):11-18.
DOI |
LI Xinghe, WANG Haitao, LIU Cunjing, et al. Evaluation of breeding application value of 80 cotton germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(11):11-18.
DOI |
|
[20] | 周绍松, 周敏, 张忠武, 等. 主成分散点图分析在烤烟新品种评价中的应用[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2018, 39(4):71-79. |
ZHOU Shaosong, ZHOU Min, ZHANG Zhongwu, et al. Application of principal component scattered point plot analysis in evaluation of new flue-cured tobacco varieties[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2018, 39(4):71-79. | |
[21] | 顾爱星, 蔡晓峰, 李海薇. 海岛棉、 陆地棉及杂交后代枯萎病抗性与产量因素的相关关系分析[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2017, 40(2):111-116. |
GU Aixing, CAI Xiaofeng, LI Haiwei. Analysis of correlation between fusarium wilt resistance and yield factors of island cotton,upland cotton and hybrid progeny[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2017, 40(2):111-116. | |
[22] | 马前程. 棉花黄萎病抗性相关的分子标记辅助选择[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2016. |
MA Qiancheng. Molecular marker-assisted selection related to Verticillium wilt resistance in cotton[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[23] | 李丹. 棉花黄萎病抗性评价指标与抗病相关基因引物分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2014. |
LI Dan. Cotton Verticillium wilt resistance evaluation index and resistance related gene primers analysis[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[24] | 杨永林, 李豪, 杨名, 等. 利用SSR标记构建新石K28的指纹图谱及遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种:1-21. |
YANG Yonglin, LI Hao, YANG Ming, et al. Construction of fingerprint and genetic diversity analysis of xinshi K28 by SSR marker[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding:1-21. | |
[25] |
单莹, 曹桂艳, 王子胜. 2009—2019年辽宁区试棉花品种枯黄萎病抗性分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(2):34-35,46.
DOI |
SHAN Ying, CAO Guiyan, WANG Zisheng. Analysis of resistance to Verticillium wilt in cotton varieties tested in Liaoning region from 2009 to 2019[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(2):34-35,46. | |
[26] | 邓亚辉, 白合提尼沙·艾海提, 宁硕, 等. 新疆棉花黄萎病新型菌株NH1致病性鉴定及抗病分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(10):3407-3414. |
DENG Yahui, Baihetinisha Aihaiti, NING Shuo, et al. Pathogenicity and resistance analysis of a novel strain of Verticillium wilt of cotton in Xinjiang[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(10):3407-3414. | |
[27] |
王俊铎, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 等. 200份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9):1623-1629.
DOI |
WANG Jundao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic traits of 200 upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9):1623-1629. | |
[28] | 李慧琴, 于娅, 王鹏, 等. 270份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状与品质性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(4):903-910. |
LI Huiqin, YU Ya, WANG Peng, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic and quality traits in 270 upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(4):903-910. | |
[29] | 刘剑光, 赵君, 徐剑文, 等. 200份陆地棉种质资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(14):66-69. |
LIU Jianguang, ZHAO Jun, XU Jianwen, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of 200 upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(14):66-69. | |
[30] | 马肖, 刘木兰, 彭嘉熹, 等. 岱字棉来源的陆地棉种质资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(4):1354-1365. |
MA Xiao, LIU Mulan, PENG Jiaxi, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of upland cotton germplasm from Daizi cotton[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(4):1354-1365. | |
[31] | 王海涛, 李兴河, 蔡肖, 等. 314份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状与品质性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(5):16-23. |
WANG Haitao, LI Xinghe, CAI Xiao, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic and quality traits in 314 upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 54(5):16-23. | |
[32] | 刘娜, 高文伟. 陆地棉耐盐表型数据的遗传多样性研究[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(11):57-62,67. |
LIU Na, GAO Wenwei. Genetic diversity of salt tolerance phenotype data in upland cotton[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(11):57-62,67. | |
[33] |
杨涛, 黄雅婕, 李生梅, 等. 海岛棉种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12):2499-2509.
DOI |
YANG Tao, HUANG Yajie, LI Shengmei, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits in sea island cotton germplasm resources[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12):2499-2509.
DOI |
[1] | WANG Peng, ZHENG Kai, ZHAO Jieyin, GAO Wenju, LONG Yilei, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation and index screening of heat resistance of Gossypium hirsutum germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090. |
[2] | YANG Ni, Mayila Yusuyin, YANG Yanlong, LI Chunping, ZHANG Dawei, XU Haijiang, LAI Chengxia. Comparative analysis of plant volatiles from the Verticillium-Infected withered spot and etiolated leaves in cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986. |
[3] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[4] | HUANG Qiannan, Maerheba Aisibaier, ZOU Hui, WANG Cairong, Ailimaimaiti Kuerban, SUN Na, LEI Junjie. Genetic diversity of main agronomic traits in Xinjiang winter wheat germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1050-1058. |
[5] | SANG Zhiwei, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, CHEN Quanjia. Analysis of mechanical harvesting characters of germplasm resources of different upland cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098. |
[6] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[7] | LI Shuo, WANG Juan, Nigary Yadikar, ZHU Jinfang, FENG Zuoshan, Parhat Ainiwaer. Functional components changes of different apricot cultivars in different development stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1200-1207. |
[8] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[9] | LIU Min, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, GENG Wenjuan. Evaluation of cold resistance of three fresh edible jujube cultivars in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 916-924. |
[10] | DU Hongyan, PANG Shengqun, MA Haixiang, JI Xuehua. Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 943-950. |
[11] | CHENG Lihua, YANG Honglan, MA Qingqian, SHI Ying, ZHANG Dawei, Alisher A. Abdullaev, ZHANG Daoyuan. Physiological identification and analysis of Verticillium wilt resistance of 10 foreign cotton germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 992-1002. |
[12] | GUO Yang, GUO Junxian, SHI Yong, LIU Li, FANG Wenyan, LIU Yancen. Prediction of SPAD Value in Melon Leaves by Characteristic Wavelength Screening Combined with PCA-LSSVM [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 616-623. |
[13] | MA Qingqian, YANG Honglan, WEI Xin, ZHANG Dawei, Alisher A Abdullaev, CHENG Lihua, ZHANG Daoyuan. Identification and Screen from Eighteen Foreign Cotton Germplasm on Agronomy and Verticillium Resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 286-294. |
[14] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[15] | CAO Yijie, SHI Zhiyong, Yusup Ablitip, Aisajan Mamat. Analysis of Amino Acid and Mineral Elements in the Rough-skinned Fruits of Korla Pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 407-415. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||