Effects of the compound topping agent of DPC on the canopy structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of machine-picked cotton

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.009

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To reveal the effect of DPC compound topping agent on the canopy structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of machine-picked cotton.【Methods】 In 2021, Xinluzhong No.88 was used as the material, and a two-factor split zone test design was adopted.The two factors were amine and topping treatment.The amine included two levels.Spraying amine (H₁) and no spray amine (H₀); topping included 3 levels, topping agent spray (D1), artificial topping (D₂) and no topping (D₃).【Results】 Compared with H₀ treatment, H₁ treatment could significantly increase the average leaf cluster inclination, colony scattered radiation transmission coefficient, chlorophyll SPAD value and net photosynthetic rate of cotton, and the increase rates were: 16.0%, 25.5%, 8.9% and 18.1%, respectively; Compared with D₂ treatment, D₁ treatment could significantly increase the leaf area index, average leaf cluster inclination, colony scattered radiation transmission coefficient, chlorophyll SPAD value and net photosynthetic rate of cotton, the increase rates were: 16.9%, 11.0%, 16.1%, 3.2%, 10.9%; Compared with H₀ treatment, the number of bolls per plant and boll weight per plant increased by 43% and 9.8%, respectively, with significant differences; The number of bolls per plant in D₁ treatment increased 9.2% and 31.9% on average compared with that of D₂ and D₃; The weight of single boll increased by 4.0% and 11.7%, respectively; The yield of seed cotton in H₀D₃ treatment was the lowest, 3,350.7 kg/hm², and the highest in H₁D₁ treatment, 7,023.6 kg/hm².Compared with H₀D₃, the yield of seed cotton in H₁D₁ treatment increased by 109.6%.The overall performance of seed cotton in each treatment was D₁ >D₂>D₃.Compared with H₀ treatment, the yield of seed cotton and lint cotton in H₁ treatment increased by 42.6% and 42.3% respectively.【Conclusion】 Choosing a compound topping agent of DPC for full chemical control can shape a reasonable canopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics suitable for machine-picked cotton harvesting and increase cotton yield, which can provide a reference for the light-simplified cultivation of machine-picked cotton and reduce production costs and increase cotton planting benefits as well.

Key words: methymine; topping agent; machine-picked cotton; canopy structure; photosynthetic characteristics; yield

摘要：

【目的】研究缩节胺复配打顶剂对机采棉冠层结构、光合特性及产量的影响。【方法】2021年以新陆中88号为材料,采用双因素裂区试验设计,二因素为缩节胺和打顶处理,缩节胺包括2个水平,喷施缩节胺(H₁)和不喷施缩节胺(H₀);打顶包括3个水平,打顶剂喷施(D₁)、人工打顶(D₂)和不打顶(D₃)。【结果】在各处理中H₁处理较H₀处理可以显著提高棉花的平均叶簇倾角、群体散射辐射透过系数、叶绿素SPAD值和净光合速率,增幅分别为16.0%、25.5%、8.9%、18.1%;D₁处理较D₂处理可以显著提高棉花的叶面积指数、平均叶簇倾角、群体散射辐射透过系数、叶绿素SPAD值和净光合速率,增幅分别为16.9%、11.0%、16.1%、3.2%、10.9%;H₁处理较H₀处理单株结铃数、单铃重分别增加了43%、9.8%,存在显著差异;D₁处理单株结铃数较D₂、D₃处理,分别平均增加了9.2%、31.9%,单铃重分别平均增加了4.0%、11.7%。棉花的籽棉产量以H₀D₃处理最低,为3 350.7 kg/hm²,H₁D₁处理最高,为7 023.6 kg/hm²,H₁D₁处理较H₀D₃处理的籽棉产量增加了109.6%,各处理籽棉产量整体表现为D₁>D₂>D₃。H₁处理较H₀处理的籽棉产量、皮棉产量分别平均增加了42.6%、42.3%。【结论】选用缩节胺复配打顶剂进行全程化学调控,可以塑造适宜机采棉采收的合理冠层结构和光合特性并提高棉花的产量,还可降低生产成本,增加植棉效益。

关键词: 缩节胺, 打顶剂, 机采棉, 冠层结构, 光合特性, 产量

CLC Number:

S562

SHEN Yingying, ZHANG Jusong, PENG Zengying, DUAN Songjiang, LI Zongrun, WU Yifan. Effects of the compound topping agent of DPC on the canopy structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of machine-picked cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1110-1117.

申莹莹, 张巨松, 彭增莹, 段松江, 李宗润, 吴一帆. 缩节胺复配打顶剂对机采棉冠层结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1110-1117.

Figures/Tables 7

References 21

[1]	武建设, 陈学庚. 新疆兵团棉花生产机械化发展现状问题及对策[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(18):5-10.
	WU Jianshe, CHEN Xuegeng. The current situation, problems and countermeasures of the development of cotton production mechanization in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(18): 5-10.
[2]	国家统计局. 国家统计局关于2021年棉花产量的公告[EB/OL]. http://wap.stats.gov.cn/fb/202112/t20211214_1825241.html, 2021-12-14.
	National Bureau of Statistics. National Bureau of Statistics announcement on cotton flower production in 2021[EB/OL]. http://wap.stats.gov.cn/fb/202112/t20211214_1825241.html, 2021-12-14.
[3]	王志坚, 徐红. 新疆机采棉的调研与发展建议[J]. 中国棉花, 2011, 38(6):10-14.
	WANG Zhijian, XU Hong. Research and development suggestion of Xinjiang mechanical picking cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2011, 38(6):10-14.
[4]	刘帅. 新型化学调控技术对棉花生长发育的影响[D]. 北京中国农业科学院, 2017.
	LIU Shuai. Effect of new chemic regulating technique on the growth and development of cotton[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017.
[5]	张旺锋, 田景山, 董恒义, 等. 新疆北疆机采棉优质高效综合栽培技术规程[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(6):37-39.
	ZHANG Wangfeng, TIAN Jingshan, DONG Hengyi, et al. Cultivation technical regulation of high-quality and high-efficiency cotton in northern Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(6):37-39.
[6]	史亚辉, 蔡晓虎, 张玉栋, 等. 不同剂量的氟节胺与缩节胺对棉花株型结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 1979-1986. DOI
	SHI Yahui, CAI Xiaohu, ZHANG Yudong, et al. Effects of Different Doses of Fluthylamine and Glycatamide on Plant Type Structure of Cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11): 1979-1986. DOI
[7]	曹立耘. 棉花化学调控技术[J]. 科学种养, 2015,(9):18.
	CAO Liyun. Cotton Chemical Control Technology[J]. Kexiu Zhongyang, 2015,(9):18.
[8]	夏芝, 王华, 吴翠翠, 等. 棉花化控技术在生产应用中常见误区及正确调控措施[J]. 现代农村科技, 2019,(12):27-28.
	XIA Zhi, WANG Hua, WU Cuicui, et al. Common misunderstandings and correct control measures in the production and application of cotton chemical control technology[J]. Xiandai Nongcun Keji, 2019,(12):27-28.
[9]	刘丽英, 戴茂华, 吴振良. 缩节胺对黄河流域机采棉农艺性状、产量和品质的影响及化控技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(33):38-42. DOI
	LIU Liying, DAI Maohua, WU Zhenliang. Study on the effects of mesoxamine on the agronomic traits, yield and quality of mechanically harvested cotton in the Yellow River Basin and its chemical control technology[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(33):38-42.
[10]	李新裕, 陈玉娟. 新疆垦区长绒棉化学封顶取代人工打顶试验研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2001,(1):11-12.
	LI Xinyu, CHEN Yujuan. Experimental study on chemical topping of long-staple cotton instead of artificial topping in Xinjiang reclamation area[J]. China Cotton, 2001, (1):11-12.
[11]	Gencsoylu I. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Agronomic Characteristics, Lint Quality, Pests, and Predators in Cotton[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2009, 28(2):147-153. DOI URL
[12]	吴慧, 王桂霞, 刘晓飞, 等. 江苏地区施用“棉太金”对棉花产量和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业, 2012, 40(29):14211-14212.
	WU Hui, WANG Guixia, LIU Xiaofei, et al. Effects of ‘Miantaijin' on Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton (Gossypium sp.) in Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(29):14211-14212.
[13]	罗宏海, 赵瑞海, 韩春丽, 等. 缩节胺(DPC)对不同密度下棉花冠层结构特征与产量性状的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(4):334-340.
	LUO Honghai, ZHAO Ruihai, HAN Chunli, et al. Effects of DPC on cotton canopy structure characteristics and yield traits under different densities[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(4): 334-340.
[14]	马宗斌, 李伶俐, 谢德意, 等. 施肥与缩节胺配合对麦后直播夏棉光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2006,(4):94-97.
	MA Zongbin, LI Lingli, XIE Deyi, et al. Effects of fertilization and methymine on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of direct-seeded summer cotton after wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2006,(4):94-97.
[15]	杨成勋, 姚贺盛, 杨延龙, 等. 化学打顶对棉花冠层结构指标及产量形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015,(7):1243-1250.
	YANG Chengxun, YAO Hesheng, YANG Yanlong, et al. Effects of chemical topping on cotton canopy structure indexes and yield formation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015,(7):1243-1250.
[16]	李林. 缩节胺调控方式对棉花农艺性状及产量影响研究[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2016.
	LI Lin. Study on the effect of mexotropin on cotton agronomic traits and yield[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2016.
[17]	徐新霞, 苏丽丽, 魏鑫, 等. DPC对杂交棉生长发育调控效应研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(7):1237-1242.
	XU Xinxia, SU Lili, WEI Xin, et al. Study on the regulation effect of DPC on the growth and development of hybrid cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(7): 1237-1242.
[18]	刘绍东, 赵新华, 张思平, 等. 缩节胺(DPC)与密度互作对麦套棉产量形成影响[C]. 中国棉花学会.中国棉花学会2012年年会暨第八次代表大会论文汇编. 中国棉花学会: 《棉花学报》编辑部, 2012:170-175.
	LIU Shaodong, ZHAO Xinhua, ZHANG Siping, et al. The effect of the interaction between DPC and density on the yield of wheat interleaving[C]. China Cotton Association.China Cotton Association 2012 Annual Meeting and Eighth Congress Paper Collection. China Cotton Society: Editorial Office of "Cotton Journal", 2012: 170-175.
[19]	刘翠, 张巨松, 魏鑫, 等. 甲哌鎓化控对南疆杂交棉功能叶生理指标及产量性状的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(2):122-129.
	LIU Cui, ZHANG Jusong, WEI Xin, et al. Effects of mepiridium chemical control on physiological indexes and yield traits of functional leaves of hybrid cotton in southern Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Science, 2014, 26(2): 122-129.
[20]	刘燕, 原保忠, 张献龙, 等. 缩节胺和整枝打顶对棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(6):8-12.
	LIU Yan, YUAN Baozhong, ZHANG Xianlong, et al. The effect of mepiamine and pruning topping on cotton yield and quality[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2013, 3(6): 8-12.
[21]	何庆雨, 代建敏, 窦巧巧, 等. 化学调控对干旱后棉花冠层时空分布及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(6):860-869.
	HE Qingyu, DAI Jianmin, DOU Qiaoqiao, et al. Effects of chemical regulation on the spatiotemporal distribution and yield of cotton canopy after drought[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 860-869.

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	pH值 pH value	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	水解性氮 Hydrolyzable nitrogen (mg/kg)	有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Quick-acting potassium (mg/kg)
0~10	7.65	0.42	8.26	35.0	26.3	83
10~20	7.60	0.49	7.65	66.4	32.9	89
20~30	7.64	0.46	7.08	44.4	32.0	87
30~40	7.66	0.30	5.90	40.6	16.6	103
40~50	7.57	0.24	4.24	35.0	7.3	138
50~60	7.67	0.25	4.06	51.7	26.6	145

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	pH值 pH value	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	水解性氮 Hydrolyzable nitrogen (mg/kg)	有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Quick-acting potassium (mg/kg)
0~10	7.65	0.42	8.26	35.0	26.3	83
10~20	7.60	0.49	7.65	66.4	32.9	89
20~30	7.64	0.46	7.08	44.4	32.0	87
30~40	7.66	0.30	5.90	40.6	16.6	103
40~50	7.57	0.24	4.24	35.0	7.3	138
50~60	7.67	0.25	4.06	51.7	26.6	145

化控处理 Chemical control processing	打顶方式 Topping mode	单株结铃数 Boll number per plant (个)	单铃重 Single boll weight (g)	衣分 Lint percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm²⁾	皮棉产量 Lint cotton yield (kg/hm²⁾
H₁	D₁	5.3^a	5.5^a	45.1^a	7 023.6^a	3 167.7^a
	D₂	5.0^b	5.3^b	44.9^a	6 297.3^b	2 827.5^b
	D₃	4.1^c	4.9^c	45.7^a	4 803.0^c	2 195.0^c
H₀	D₁	4.2^c	5.0^c	45.4^a	5 076.0^c	2 304.5^c
	D₂	3.7^d	4.8^c	44.0^a	4 284.6^d	1 885.2^d
	D₃	3.1^e	4.5^d	46.7^a	3 350.7^e	1 564.8^e
H		**	**	NS	**	**
D		**	**	NS	**	**
H×D		NS	**	NS	NS	*

化控处理 Chemical control processing	打顶方式 Topping mode	单株结铃数 Boll number per plant (个)	单铃重 Single boll weight (g)	衣分 Lint percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm²⁾	皮棉产量 Lint cotton yield (kg/hm²⁾
H₁	D₁	5.3^a	5.5^a	45.1^a	7 023.6^a	3 167.7^a
	D₂	5.0^b	5.3^b	44.9^a	6 297.3^b	2 827.5^b
	D₃	4.1^c	4.9^c	45.7^a	4 803.0^c	2 195.0^c
H₀	D₁	4.2^c	5.0^c	45.4^a	5 076.0^c	2 304.5^c
	D₂	3.7^d	4.8^c	44.0^a	4 284.6^d	1 885.2^d
	D₃	3.1^e	4.5^d	46.7^a	3 350.7^e	1 564.8^e
H		**	**	NS	**	**
D		**	**	NS	**	**
H×D		NS	**	NS	NS	*