Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 2861-2869.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.001
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Cultivation Physiology · Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Long(), ZHAO Fuxiang, DUAN Yajie, CAI Yongsheng, ZHENG Kai, CHEN Qin, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying()
Received:
2022-01-22
Online:
2022-12-20
Published:
2023-01-30
Correspondence author:
QU Yanying
Supported by:
杨龙(), 赵福相, 段雅洁, 蔡永生, 郑凯, 陈琴, 陈全家, 曲延英()
通讯作者:
曲延英
作者简介:
杨龙(1994-),男,湖南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花抗旱育种,(E-mail)18373009232@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YANG Long, ZHAO Fuxiang, DUAN Yajie, CAI Yongsheng, ZHENG Kai, CHEN Qin, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation on Drought Resistance of Recombinant Inbred Lines of Gossypium barbadense L. at Flowering and Boll Stages[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2861-2869.
杨龙, 赵福相, 段雅洁, 蔡永生, 郑凯, 陈琴, 陈全家, 曲延英. 海岛棉重组自交系群体花铃期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2861-2869.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.001
性状 Traits | 处理 Deal | 基因型 Genotype | 环境 Environment | 基因与环境互作 GE_interaction | 遗传力 Heritability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 74.35** | 7.91** | 45.58** | 1.18 | 0.85 |
有效果枝数Number of effective branches | 21.17** | 2.64** | 176.83** | 1.06 | 0.61 |
铃数Number of bells | 3.99* | 1.71** | 19.43** | 0.89 | 0.42 |
有效铃数Effective number of bells | 19.43** | 1.77** | 183.91** | 1.00 | 0.43 |
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight | 5.76** | 1.61** | 14.95** | 0.62 | 0.38 |
单株籽棉产量Yield of single plant seed cotton | 47.21** | 1.48** | 248.25** | 0.87 | 0.33 |
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant | 25.49** | 1.84** | 204.68** | 0.96 | 0.46 |
Table 1 Analysis of variance and generalizedheritability
性状 Traits | 处理 Deal | 基因型 Genotype | 环境 Environment | 基因与环境互作 GE_interaction | 遗传力 Heritability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 74.35** | 7.91** | 45.58** | 1.18 | 0.85 |
有效果枝数Number of effective branches | 21.17** | 2.64** | 176.83** | 1.06 | 0.61 |
铃数Number of bells | 3.99* | 1.71** | 19.43** | 0.89 | 0.42 |
有效铃数Effective number of bells | 19.43** | 1.77** | 183.91** | 1.00 | 0.43 |
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight | 5.76** | 1.61** | 14.95** | 0.62 | 0.38 |
单株籽棉产量Yield of single plant seed cotton | 47.21** | 1.48** | 248.25** | 0.87 | 0.33 |
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant | 25.49** | 1.84** | 204.68** | 0.96 | 0.46 |
性状 Traits | 处理 Deal | 亲本Parents | RILs(n=71)Recombinant inbred Lines | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PimaS-7 | 5917 | 均值 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 极小值 Min-value | 极大值 Maximum | 峰度 Kurtosis | 偏度 Degree of deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%) | T检验 T test | ||
株高 Plant height | W | 74.15 | 96.49 | 74.42 | 8.79 | 55.75 | 101.18 | 55.75 | 101.18 | 11.81 | <0.001 |
D | 61.79 | 80.67 | 68.01 | 7.11 | 50.10 | 83.80 | 50.10 | 83.80 | 10.45 | ||
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches | W | 5.71 | 7.41 | 5.30 | 0.73 | 3.93 | 7.88 | 3.93 | 7.88 | 13.68 | <0.001 |
D | 6.47 | 6.51 | 4.91 | 0.70 | 3.44 | 6.74 | 3.44 | 6.74 | 14.21 | ||
铃数 Number of bells | W | 9.69 | 10.55 | 7.05 | 0.93 | 5.13 | 9.82 | 5.13 | 9.82 | 13.20 | <0.037 |
D | 9.58 | 8.24 | 7.43 | 1.16 | 4.76 | 10.19 | 4.76 | 10.19 | 15.59 | ||
有效铃数 Effective number of bells | W | 7.70 | 9.03 | 6.14 | 0.91 | 4.31 | 9.24 | 4.31 | 9.24 | 14.79 | 0.007 |
D | 8.25 | 6.99 | 5.75 | 0.85 | 4.04 | 7.45 | 4.04 | 7.45 | 14.78 | ||
单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight | W | 1.21 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 1.59 | 1.00 | 1.59 | 9.49 | 0.008 |
D | 1.28 | 1.31 | 1.19 | 0.13 | 0.83 | 1.45 | 0.83 | 1.45 | 10.96 | ||
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton | W | 24.07 | 35.32 | 21.28 | 3.22 | 15.48 | 30.85 | 15.48 | 30.85 | 15.15 | <0.001 |
D | 26.94 | 26.33 | 18.95 | 3.20 | 11.73 | 24.98 | 11.73 | 24.98 | 16.91 | ||
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant | W | 8.77 | 11.47 | 7.58 | 1.24 | 5.12 | 10.67 | 5.12 | 10.67 | 16.37 | <0.001 |
D | 10.09 | 9.27 | 6.78 | 1.25 | 3.96 | 9.53 | 3.96 | 9.53 | 18.44 |
Table 2 Descriptive analysis of main agronomic traits in the flowering and boll stage of RIL populations and their parents
性状 Traits | 处理 Deal | 亲本Parents | RILs(n=71)Recombinant inbred Lines | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PimaS-7 | 5917 | 均值 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 极小值 Min-value | 极大值 Maximum | 峰度 Kurtosis | 偏度 Degree of deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%) | T检验 T test | ||
株高 Plant height | W | 74.15 | 96.49 | 74.42 | 8.79 | 55.75 | 101.18 | 55.75 | 101.18 | 11.81 | <0.001 |
D | 61.79 | 80.67 | 68.01 | 7.11 | 50.10 | 83.80 | 50.10 | 83.80 | 10.45 | ||
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches | W | 5.71 | 7.41 | 5.30 | 0.73 | 3.93 | 7.88 | 3.93 | 7.88 | 13.68 | <0.001 |
D | 6.47 | 6.51 | 4.91 | 0.70 | 3.44 | 6.74 | 3.44 | 6.74 | 14.21 | ||
铃数 Number of bells | W | 9.69 | 10.55 | 7.05 | 0.93 | 5.13 | 9.82 | 5.13 | 9.82 | 13.20 | <0.037 |
D | 9.58 | 8.24 | 7.43 | 1.16 | 4.76 | 10.19 | 4.76 | 10.19 | 15.59 | ||
有效铃数 Effective number of bells | W | 7.70 | 9.03 | 6.14 | 0.91 | 4.31 | 9.24 | 4.31 | 9.24 | 14.79 | 0.007 |
D | 8.25 | 6.99 | 5.75 | 0.85 | 4.04 | 7.45 | 4.04 | 7.45 | 14.78 | ||
单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight | W | 1.21 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 1.59 | 1.00 | 1.59 | 9.49 | 0.008 |
D | 1.28 | 1.31 | 1.19 | 0.13 | 0.83 | 1.45 | 0.83 | 1.45 | 10.96 | ||
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton | W | 24.07 | 35.32 | 21.28 | 3.22 | 15.48 | 30.85 | 15.48 | 30.85 | 15.15 | <0.001 |
D | 26.94 | 26.33 | 18.95 | 3.20 | 11.73 | 24.98 | 11.73 | 24.98 | 16.91 | ||
单株皮棉产量 Lint yield per plant | W | 8.77 | 11.47 | 7.58 | 1.24 | 5.12 | 10.67 | 5.12 | 10.67 | 16.37 | <0.001 |
D | 10.09 | 9.27 | 6.78 | 1.25 | 3.96 | 9.53 | 3.96 | 9.53 | 18.44 |
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 有效果枝数 Number of effective branches | 铃数 Number of bells | 有效铃数 Effective number of bells | 单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight | 单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton | 单株皮 棉产量 Lint yield per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 1 | ||||||
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches | 0.430** | 1 | |||||
铃数Number of bells | 0.444** | 0.767** | 1 | ||||
有效铃数Effective number of bells | 0.446** | 0.852** | 0.826** | 1 | |||
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight | -0.160 | -0.126 | -0.144 | -0.128 | 1 | ||
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton | 0.372** | 0.730** | 0.726** | 0.824** | 0.336** | 1 | |
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant | 0.291* | 0.690** | 0.640** | 0.830** | 0.434** | 0.933** | 1 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of drought resistance coefficients of various traits
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 有效果枝数 Number of effective branches | 铃数 Number of bells | 有效铃数 Effective number of bells | 单铃皮棉重 Lint boll weight | 单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton | 单株皮 棉产量 Lint yield per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 1 | ||||||
有效果枝数 Number of effective branches | 0.430** | 1 | |||||
铃数Number of bells | 0.444** | 0.767** | 1 | ||||
有效铃数Effective number of bells | 0.446** | 0.852** | 0.826** | 1 | |||
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight | -0.160 | -0.126 | -0.144 | -0.128 | 1 | ||
单株籽棉产量 Yield of single plant seed cotton | 0.372** | 0.730** | 0.726** | 0.824** | 0.336** | 1 | |
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant | 0.291* | 0.690** | 0.640** | 0.830** | 0.434** | 0.933** | 1 |
性状Traits | 因子载荷Load factor | |
---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | |
株高Plant height | 0.59 | -0.28 |
有效果枝数Number of effective branches | 0.90 | -0.03 |
铃数Number of bells | 0.89 | -0.09 |
有效铃数Effective number of bells | 0.96 | 0.02 |
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight | -0.09 | 0.96 |
单株籽棉产量Yield of single plant seed cotton | 0.87 | 0.44 |
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant | 0.81 | 0.56 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.35 | 1.43 |
贡献率Contribution rate | 60.89 | 21.63 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate | 60.89 | 82.52 |
因子权重Factor weight | 0.74 | 0.26 |
Table 4 The feature vector and contribution rate of the principal components of each trait
性状Traits | 因子载荷Load factor | |
---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | |
株高Plant height | 0.59 | -0.28 |
有效果枝数Number of effective branches | 0.90 | -0.03 |
铃数Number of bells | 0.89 | -0.09 |
有效铃数Effective number of bells | 0.96 | 0.02 |
单铃皮棉重Lint boll weight | -0.09 | 0.96 |
单株籽棉产量Yield of single plant seed cotton | 0.87 | 0.44 |
单株皮棉产量Lint yield per plant | 0.81 | 0.56 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.35 | 1.43 |
贡献率Contribution rate | 60.89 | 21.63 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate | 60.89 | 82.52 |
因子权重Factor weight | 0.74 | 0.26 |
类群 Group | 分类 Classification | 抗旱等级 Drought resistance rating | 平均D值 Mean of D | 数量 Quantity |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 较敏旱型材料 | III | 0.42 | 29 |
2 | 抗旱型材料 | II | 0.60 | 27 |
3 | 敏旱型材料 | IV | 0.23 | 14 |
4 | 强抗旱型材料 | I | 0.84 | 3 |
2 | PimaS-7 | II | 0.62 | |
3 | 5917 | IV | 0.34 |
Table 5 RIL population comprehensive D value classification statistics table
类群 Group | 分类 Classification | 抗旱等级 Drought resistance rating | 平均D值 Mean of D | 数量 Quantity |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 较敏旱型材料 | III | 0.42 | 29 |
2 | 抗旱型材料 | II | 0.60 | 27 |
3 | 敏旱型材料 | IV | 0.23 | 14 |
4 | 强抗旱型材料 | I | 0.84 | 3 |
2 | PimaS-7 | II | 0.62 | |
3 | 5917 | IV | 0.34 |
模型项 Model project | 系数 Coefficient | 标准系数 Standard coefficient | T检验 T test | 显著性 Statistical significance | 容差 Tolerance | 共线性 Collinearity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
调整R2 Adjusted R-Square | 0.999 | |||||
德宾德宾-瓦特逊检验Durbin-Watson test | 2.022 | |||||
常量Constant | -0.771 | -80.652 | <0.001 | |||
株高DCPlant height DC | 0.089 | 0.071 | 18.313 | <0.001 | 0.720 | 1.390 |
有效果枝数DC Number of effective branches DC | 0.173 | 0.179 | 28.208 | <0.001 | 0.270 | 3.697 |
铃数DCNumber of bells DC | 0.132 | 0.155 | 25.594 | <0.001 | 0.296 | 3.373 |
有效铃数DCEffective number of bells DC | 0.343 | 0.413 | 42.617 | <0.001 | 0.116 | 8.610 |
单铃皮棉重DCLint boll weight DC | 0.338 | 0.254 | 42.826 | <0.001 | 0.311 | 3.212 |
单株籽棉产量DCYield of single plant seed cotton DC | 0.230 | 0.267 | 25.583 | <0.001 | 0.100 | 9.975 |
Table 6 Regression analysis statistics table
模型项 Model project | 系数 Coefficient | 标准系数 Standard coefficient | T检验 T test | 显著性 Statistical significance | 容差 Tolerance | 共线性 Collinearity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
调整R2 Adjusted R-Square | 0.999 | |||||
德宾德宾-瓦特逊检验Durbin-Watson test | 2.022 | |||||
常量Constant | -0.771 | -80.652 | <0.001 | |||
株高DCPlant height DC | 0.089 | 0.071 | 18.313 | <0.001 | 0.720 | 1.390 |
有效果枝数DC Number of effective branches DC | 0.173 | 0.179 | 28.208 | <0.001 | 0.270 | 3.697 |
铃数DCNumber of bells DC | 0.132 | 0.155 | 25.594 | <0.001 | 0.296 | 3.373 |
有效铃数DCEffective number of bells DC | 0.343 | 0.413 | 42.617 | <0.001 | 0.116 | 8.610 |
单铃皮棉重DCLint boll weight DC | 0.338 | 0.254 | 42.826 | <0.001 | 0.311 | 3.212 |
单株籽棉产量DCYield of single plant seed cotton DC | 0.230 | 0.267 | 25.583 | <0.001 | 0.100 | 9.975 |
[1] | 毛树春, 李亚兵, 冯璐, 等. 新疆棉花生产发展问题研究[J]. 农业展望, 2014,(11): 43-51. |
MAO Shuchun, LI Yabing, FENG Lu, et al. Research on the development of cotton production in Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Outlook, 2014,(11): 43-51. | |
[2] | 程林梅, 张原根, 阎继耀, 等. 土壤干旱对棉花生理特性与产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 1995,(4): 233-237. |
CHENG Linmei, ZHANG Yuangen, YAN Jiyao, et al. The effect of soil drought on cotton physiological characteristics and yield[J]. Cotton Science, 1995,(4): 233-237. | |
[3] | 杨长琴, 刘瑞显, 张国伟, 等. 花铃期干旱对棉纤维素累积及纤维比强度的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015, 31(6): 1218-1223. |
YANG Changqin, LIU Ruixian, ZHANG Guowei, et al. The effect of drought during flowering and boll stage on cotton cellulose accumulation and fiber specific strength[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 31(6): 1218-1223. | |
[4] | 季术. 花铃期土壤持续干旱对棉纤维品质和棉纤维发育相关酶活性的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2016. |
JI Shu. The effect of continuous soil drought at the flowering and boll stage on cotton fiber quality and cotton fiber development-related enzyme activities[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[5] | 郭香墨. 我国专用棉育种现状与发展[J]. 棉花学报, 1995, (2): 65-69. |
GUO Xiangmo. Status and development of special cotton breeding in my country[J]. Cotton Science, 1995,(2): 65-69. | |
[6] | Niu J Z, Ma S D, Chen H J, et al. The compensation effects of physiology and yield in cotton after drought stress[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2018: 224-225. |
[7] | 袁钧, 郝秀忍. 棉花耐旱生态指标研究初报[J]. 中国棉花, 1991, (2): 9-10. |
YUAN Jun, HAO Xiuren, et al. A preliminary report on cotton drought tolerance ecological indicators[J]. China Cotton, 1991,(2): 9-10. | |
[8] | 李少昆, 肖璐, 黄文华, 等. 不同时期干旱胁迫对棉花生长和产量的影响Ⅱ棉花生长发育及生理特性的变化[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 3(4): 261-264. |
LI Shaokun, XIAO Lu, HUANG Wenhua, et al. Effects of drought stress on cotton growth and yield in different periods II Changes in cotton growth and physiological characteristics[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 1999, 3(4): 261-264. | |
[9] |
Abid U, Sun H, Yang X Y, et al. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(3): 15-17.
DOI URL |
[10] | Reza H, Ahmad M, Mohammad N, et al. Survey of the Effect of Different Irrigation Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Sensitive and Tolerant Cotton Cultivars[J]. Majallah-iābvaKhāk, 2017, 30(5): 7-9. |
[11] | 俞希根, 孙景生. 棉花适宜土壤水分下限和干旱指标研究[J]. 棉花学报, 1999, (1): 35-38. |
YU Xigen, SUN Jingsheng. Study on the lower limit of suitable soil moisture and drought index for cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 1999,(1): 35-38. | |
[12] |
赵福相, 曲延英, 陈全家, 等. 海岛棉种质资源抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7): 1187-1195.
DOI |
ZHAO Fuxiang, QU Yanying, CHEN Quanjia, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of island cotton germplasm resources[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(7): 1187-1195.
DOI |
|
[13] | 李海明, 刘绍东, 张思平. 陆地棉种质资源花铃期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(3): 583-597. |
LI Haiming, LIU Shaodong, ZHANG Siping. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance index screening of upland cotton germplasm resources during flowering and boll stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(3): 583-597. | |
[14] | 李志博, 徐建伟, 李衡. 后期持续干旱对北疆棉花生长发育的影响及其抗旱适应性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3): 45-49, 82. |
LI Zhibo, XU Jianwei, LI Heng. The effect of sustained drought in the later period on the growth and development of cotton in northern Xinjiang and its drought resistance adaptability evaluation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(3): 45-49, 82. | |
[15] | 李忠旺, 陈玉梁, 罗俊杰. 棉花抗旱品种筛选鉴定及抗旱性综合评价方法[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(1): 240-247. |
LI Zhongwang, CHEN Yuliang, LUO Junjie. Drought-resistant cotton varieties screening and identification and comprehensive evaluation method for drought resistance[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2017, 35(1): 240-247. | |
[16] | 高宝云, 张军. 9个冬小麦品种对苗期干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 山西农业科学, 2017, 45(3): 340-345. |
GAO Baoyun, ZHANG Jun. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of 9 winter wheat varieties to drought at seedling stage[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(3): 340-345. | |
[17] |
张海燕, 解备涛, 汪宝卿, 等. 不同甘薯品种抗旱性评价及耐旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 419-430.
DOI |
ZHANG Haiyan, XIE Beitao, WANG Baoqing, et al. Drought resistance evaluation and drought resistance index screening of different sweet potato varieties[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(3): 419-430.
DOI |
|
[18] | 王兴荣, 张彦军, 李玥, 等. 干旱胁迫对大豆生长的影响及抗旱性评价方法与指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(1): 49-56. |
WANG Xingrong, ZHANG Yanjun, LI Yue, et al. Effects of drought stress on soybean growth and drought resistance evaluation methods and index screening[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018, 19(1): 49-56. | |
[19] | 陈善福, 舒庆尧. 植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 16(5): 555-560. |
CHEN Shanfu, SHU Qingyao. The biological mechanism of plant drought stress tolerance and its genetic engineering research progress[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999, 16(5): 555-560. | |
[20] | 李安西. 棉花丰产栽培技术[J]. 江西棉花, 2005, 27(3): 49. |
LI Anxi. High-yield cotton cultivation techniques[J]. Jiangxi Cotton, 2005, 27(3): 49. | |
[21] | 俞希根, 孙景生. 棉花适宜土壤水分下限和干旱指标研究[J]. 棉花学报, 1999,(1): 35-38. |
YU Xigen, SUN Jingsheng. Study on the lower limit of suitable soil moisture and drought index for cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 1999,(1): 35-38. | |
[22] | 庄振刚, 叶春秀, 李有忠. 新疆陆地棉早熟品种花铃期抗旱性初步评价[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(7): 5-7. |
ZHUANG Zhengang, YE Chunxiu, LI Youzhong. Preliminary evaluation on drought resistance of Xinjiang upland cotton early-maturing varieties during flowering and boll stage[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(7): 5-7. | |
[23] | 张换样, 吴慎杰, 竹梦婕, 等. 全生育期干旱胁迫下棉花主要农艺性状变化研究[J]. 现代农村科技, 2020,(1): 69-70. |
ZHANG Huanyang, WU Shenjie, ZHU Mengjie, et al. Changes in cotton main agronomic characteristics under drought stress during the whole growth period[J]. Modern Rural Science and Technology, 2020,(1): 69-70. | |
[24] | 郑巨云, 梁亚军, 李雪源, 等. 棉花品种资源花铃期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(2): 150-163. |
ZHENG Juyun, LIANG Yajun, LI Xueyuan, et al. Identification and evaluation of drought resistance of cotton variety resources during flowering and boll stage[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2021, 39(2): 150-163. | |
[25] | 姜梦辉, 孙丰磊, 陈全家. 棉花陆海重组自交系群体花铃期抗旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(6): 1635-1643. |
JIANG Menghui, SUN Fenglei, CHEN Quanjia, et al. Identification and evaluation of drought resistance of cotton land-sea recombined inbred line population during flowering and boll stage[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(6): 1635-1643. | |
[26] | 王飞名. 栽培稻抗旱性的性状鉴定与水分适应度研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2008. |
WANG Feiming. Study on the identification of drought resistance and water adaptability of cultivated rice[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008. | |
[27] | 金黎明, 李力, 荣义华, 等. 转Bt基因抗虫杂交棉产量与重要性状的多元线性回归分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(17): 8894-8896, 8899. |
JIN Liming, LI Li, Rong Yihua, et al. Multiple linear regression analysis of yield and important traits of transgenic Bt hybrid cotton[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(17): 8894-8896, 8899. | |
[28] | 吴晓东, 孙骥, 王子胜, 等. 特早熟杂交棉杂种优势比较及产量构成因素回归分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(5): 19-22. |
WU Xiaodong, SUN Ji, WANG Zisheng, et al. Comparison of heterosis of extra-early maturity hybrid cotton and regression analysis of yield components[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(5): 19-22. |
[1] | MA Xiaomei, LI Baocheng, DONG Chengguan, ZHOU Xiaofeng, WANG Xin, TIAN Qin, ZHAO Suqing, WANG Gang. Correlation between Leaf Morphological Indexes and Defoliation Regularity of Early-maturing Upland Cotton Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1301-1311. |
[2] | MA Zhilong, PENG Bin, Caddey Kader, ZHANG Yuanming, Adili Sattar. Effects of Forest Conditions and Stand Structure on the Quantity of Agrilus mali Mats in Tianshan Wild Apple Forest [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(7): 1338-1348. |
[3] | REN Yi, WANG Xian, ZHANG Jin-shan, NIE Shi-hui, WU Gao-ming, GENG Hong-wei, FANG Fu-rong. Screening and Identification of Drought Resistance of Central Asian Barley Varieties at Germination Stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(5): 882-889. |
[4] | MA Xiao-mei, ZHAO Shu-qing, DONG Chen-guang, ZHOU Xiao-feng, WANG Xin, LI Bao-cheng. Correlation Analyses between the Main Plant Ideotype Traits and the Yield of Early-Maturing Upland Cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(11): 1961-1967. |
[5] | BAI Jian-yu, SONG Feng-hui, WU Zheng-bao, LIU Zheng-xing, CUI Yan-hua, SHI Yan-jiang. The Correlation between Diseased Level of Jujube Black Spot and Nutrient Content of Jun Jujube Fruit under Different Cultivation Patterns [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(9): 1651-1658. |
[6] | ZHOU Zi-xin;WANG Juan;JIA Dong-hai;LAN Hai-yan;CHEN Yue-hua. Multiple Analyses of Relationship between Major Agronomic Traits and Yield of Safflower Germplasm Resources from Foreign Countries [J]. , 2017, 54(6): 1047-1053. |
[7] | CUI Hong-liang;MIAO Hao-cui;LI Li-min;ZHANG jian-cheng;WU zheng-feng;GAO ying. Agronomic Traits Analysis of Introduced Peanut Varieties in Xinjiang [J]. , 2016, 53(12): 2242-2249. |
[8] | JU Le;QI Jun-cang;HE Xue;WANG Dan;HOU Zhong-qing;FU Qiang;XIONG Xian-peng. Screening Drought Resistance Identification Index and Drought Resistance Evaluation in Barley during Seed Germination Period [J]. , 2016, 53(11): 2008-2014. |
[9] | . The Drought Resistance Evaluation of Cotton Germplasm Resources [J]. , 2014, 51(11): 1961-1969. |
[10] | . Change, Correlation and Regression Analysis of Body Weight and Body Size Index in Kyrgyz Mare at Different Ages [J]. , 2014, 51(10): 1942-1947. |
[11] | LI Jun-wei;GUO Jun-xian;HU Guang-hui;LIU Jun;YU Fei-yu. Prediction and Classification of Single Grape Weight and Size Based on Machine Vision Techniques [J]. , 2014, 51(10): 1862-1868. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||