Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (10): 2358-2364.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.003
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics • Previous Articles Next Articles
REN Dan(), HUANG Yajie, CUI Jinxin, PANG Bo, GAO Wenwei(
)
Received:
2021-11-26
Online:
2022-10-20
Published:
2022-12-21
Correspondence author:
GAO Wenwei
Supported by:
通讯作者:
高文伟
作者简介:
任丹(1995),女,新疆人,硕士,研究方向为棉花杂交育种,(E-mail) 1160010286@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
REN Dan, HUANG Yajie, CUI Jinxin, PANG Bo, GAO Wenwei. Analysis of Representative Genetic Traits in Cotton after Crossing[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2358-2364.
任丹, 黄雅婕, 崔进鑫, 庞博, 高文伟. 棉花杂交后代表型性状遗传分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2358-2364.
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TM-1 | 93.40±1.00a | 18.40±0.00a | 4.90±0.10a | 5.90±0.20a | 6.90±0.10a | 7.90±0.05a | 8.90±0.50a | 4.24±0.22a | 0.38±0.01a |
新海 16号 | 87.95±0.55a | 16.90±0.3a | 5.00±1.00a | 12.80±0.60a | 10.50±0.50a | 13.40±2.00a | 9.50±0.70a | 2.65±0.13a | 0.311±0.0 |
HL 群体 | 73.00±2.00a | 14.66±1.66a | 4.00±0.3 | 11.66±0.66a | 11.33±1.00a | 20.50±3.1 | 17.83±0.50b | 4.05±0.05a | 0.325±0.005b |
LH 群体 | 91.33±6.33a | 20.16±0.1 | 5.33±0.33a | 10.66±1a | 9.66±0.33a | 20.16±1.50b | 16.33±0.66b | 3.65±0.05b | 0.335±0.015b |
Table 1 Analysis of significant correlation between parents and F1 agronomic traits
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TM-1 | 93.40±1.00a | 18.40±0.00a | 4.90±0.10a | 5.90±0.20a | 6.90±0.10a | 7.90±0.05a | 8.90±0.50a | 4.24±0.22a | 0.38±0.01a |
新海 16号 | 87.95±0.55a | 16.90±0.3a | 5.00±1.00a | 12.80±0.60a | 10.50±0.50a | 13.40±2.00a | 9.50±0.70a | 2.65±0.13a | 0.311±0.0 |
HL 群体 | 73.00±2.00a | 14.66±1.66a | 4.00±0.3 | 11.66±0.66a | 11.33±1.00a | 20.50±3.1 | 17.83±0.50b | 4.05±0.05a | 0.325±0.005b |
LH 群体 | 91.33±6.33a | 20.16±0.1 | 5.33±0.33a | 10.66±1a | 9.66±0.33a | 20.16±1.50b | 16.33±0.66b | 3.65±0.05b | 0.335±0.015b |
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
亲本 Parents | TM-1 | 94.40 | 18.40 | 4.80 | 10.60 | 6.80 | 8.00 | 7.80 | 84.76 | 32.06 |
新海16号 | 87.40 | 16.60 | 4.00 | 12.20 | 10.00 | 11.40 | 8.80 | 52.98 | 16.57 | |
HL群体 | 平均值 | 85.79 | 4.55 | 22.21 | 11.76 | 11.00 | 17.94 | 14.73 | 2.52 | 0.38 |
标准偏差 | 30.72 | 1.64 | 14.56 | 3.92 | 4.37 | 9.19 | 6.89 | 0.89 | 0.07 | |
偏度 | -0.57 | 0.52 | 2.36 | 1.41 | 1.26 | 1.04 | 1.18 | 0.64 | 1.66 | |
峰度 | 0.90 | -0.48 | 6.40 | 2.59 | 1.81 | 0.70 | 1.66 | 0.38 | 4.85 | |
最小值 | 11.00 | 2.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 0.83 | 0.27 | |
最大值 | 137.00 | 8.00 | 77.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 43.00 | 36.00 | 4.72 | 0.65 | |
变异系数(%) | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.19 | |
LH群体 | 平均值 | 84.33 | 4.79 | 24.08 | 10.46 | 9.54 | 15.50 | 12.54 | 2.79 | 0.38 |
标准偏差 | 11.30 | 1.14 | 7.01 | 2.67 | 2.75 | 7.72 | 6.24 | 1.06 | 0.08 | |
偏度 | -1.11 | 1.02 | 0.46 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.73 | 1.02 | 0.64 | 0.77 | |
峰度 | 1.40 | 1.82 | -0.25 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 3.36 | -0.47 | 1.86 | |
最小值 | 54.00 | 3.00 | 12.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1.26 | 0.22 | |
最大值 | 102.00 | 8.00 | 39.00 | 17.00 | 16.00 | 32.00 | 32.00 | 4.93 | 0.59 | |
变异系数/% | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.38 | 0.20 |
Table2 Descriptive statistical analysis of all traits in parents and populations
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
亲本 Parents | TM-1 | 94.40 | 18.40 | 4.80 | 10.60 | 6.80 | 8.00 | 7.80 | 84.76 | 32.06 |
新海16号 | 87.40 | 16.60 | 4.00 | 12.20 | 10.00 | 11.40 | 8.80 | 52.98 | 16.57 | |
HL群体 | 平均值 | 85.79 | 4.55 | 22.21 | 11.76 | 11.00 | 17.94 | 14.73 | 2.52 | 0.38 |
标准偏差 | 30.72 | 1.64 | 14.56 | 3.92 | 4.37 | 9.19 | 6.89 | 0.89 | 0.07 | |
偏度 | -0.57 | 0.52 | 2.36 | 1.41 | 1.26 | 1.04 | 1.18 | 0.64 | 1.66 | |
峰度 | 0.90 | -0.48 | 6.40 | 2.59 | 1.81 | 0.70 | 1.66 | 0.38 | 4.85 | |
最小值 | 11.00 | 2.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 0.83 | 0.27 | |
最大值 | 137.00 | 8.00 | 77.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 43.00 | 36.00 | 4.72 | 0.65 | |
变异系数(%) | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.19 | |
LH群体 | 平均值 | 84.33 | 4.79 | 24.08 | 10.46 | 9.54 | 15.50 | 12.54 | 2.79 | 0.38 |
标准偏差 | 11.30 | 1.14 | 7.01 | 2.67 | 2.75 | 7.72 | 6.24 | 1.06 | 0.08 | |
偏度 | -1.11 | 1.02 | 0.46 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.73 | 1.02 | 0.64 | 0.77 | |
峰度 | 1.40 | 1.82 | -0.25 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 3.36 | -0.47 | 1.86 | |
最小值 | 54.00 | 3.00 | 12.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1.26 | 0.22 | |
最大值 | 102.00 | 8.00 | 39.00 | 17.00 | 16.00 | 32.00 | 32.00 | 4.93 | 0.59 | |
变异系数/% | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.38 | 0.20 |
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height(cm) | 1 | ||||||||
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.09 | 1 | |||||||
始节数 Number of the first branch | 0.13 | 0.63** | 1 | ||||||
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.41* | -0.50** | -0.39* | 1 | |||||
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.38* | -0.47** | -0.32 | 0.93** | 1 | ||||
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.03 | -0.24 | -0.17 | 0.45** | 0.52** | 1 | |||
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.12 | -0.31 | -0.16 | 0.60** | 0.63** | 0.83** | 1 | ||
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | -0.19 | 0.24 | 0.06 | -0.22 | -0.28 | -0.35* | -0.35* | 1 | |
衣分Lint percentage(%) | -0.19 | 0.12 | 0.09 | -0.21 | -0.26 | -0.23 | -0.31 | 0.08 | 1 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of agronomic traits in HL populations
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height(cm) | 1 | ||||||||
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.09 | 1 | |||||||
始节数 Number of the first branch | 0.13 | 0.63** | 1 | ||||||
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.41* | -0.50** | -0.39* | 1 | |||||
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.38* | -0.47** | -0.32 | 0.93** | 1 | ||||
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.03 | -0.24 | -0.17 | 0.45** | 0.52** | 1 | |||
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.12 | -0.31 | -0.16 | 0.60** | 0.63** | 0.83** | 1 | ||
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | -0.19 | 0.24 | 0.06 | -0.22 | -0.28 | -0.35* | -0.35* | 1 | |
衣分Lint percentage(%) | -0.19 | 0.12 | 0.09 | -0.21 | -0.26 | -0.23 | -0.31 | 0.08 | 1 |
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height(cm) | 1 | ||||||||
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.13 | 1 | |||||||
始节数 Number of the first branch | -0.40 | 0.60** | 1 | ||||||
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.23 | -0.32 | -0.34 | 1 | |||||
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.22 | -0.30 | -0.33 | 0.90** | 1 | ||||
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.09 | -.53** | -.40* | 0.44* | 0.49* | 1 | |||
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | -0.00 | -.52** | -0.27 | 0.51** | 0.53** | 0.71** | 1 | ||
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | -0.14 | -0.25 | -.41* | 0.40 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 1 | |
衣分Lint percentage(%) | -0.07 | 0.06 | -0.18 | -0.23 | -0.34 | 0.09 | -0.01 | -0.07 | 1 |
Table 4 Correlation analysis of agronomic traits in LH.populations
项目 Item | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 始节高 Height of the first branchcm (cm) | 始节数 Number of the first branch | 果枝数 Fruit branch number | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 总铃数 Boll number per plant | 有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height(cm) | 1 | ||||||||
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.13 | 1 | |||||||
始节数 Number of the first branch | -0.40 | 0.60** | 1 | ||||||
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.23 | -0.32 | -0.34 | 1 | |||||
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.22 | -0.30 | -0.33 | 0.90** | 1 | ||||
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.09 | -.53** | -.40* | 0.44* | 0.49* | 1 | |||
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | -0.00 | -.52** | -0.27 | 0.51** | 0.53** | 0.71** | 1 | ||
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | -0.14 | -0.25 | -.41* | 0.40 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 1 | |
衣分Lint percentage(%) | -0.07 | 0.06 | -0.18 | -0.23 | -0.34 | 0.09 | -0.01 | -0.07 | 1 |
项目Item | 成分1 | 成分2 | 成分3 |
---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height(cm) | 0.351 | 0.478 | 0.715 |
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.465 | 0.785 | -0.023 |
始节数 Number of the first branch | -0.627 | 0.585 | -0.147 |
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.878 | -0.026 | 0.286 |
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.895 | 0.057 | 0.206 |
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.722 | 0.214 | -0.55 |
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.811 | 0.239 | -0.407 |
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | -0.451 | -0.218 | 0.182 |
衣分Lint percentage(%) | -0.379 | -0.235 | -0.051 |
特征值Eigenvable | 3.829 | 1.397 | 1.162 |
贡献率Contribution rate(%) | 42.545 | 15.519 | 12.913 |
累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate(%) | 42.545 | 58.064 | 70.977 |
Table 5 Principal component loading matrix of HL populations
项目Item | 成分1 | 成分2 | 成分3 |
---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height(cm) | 0.351 | 0.478 | 0.715 |
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.465 | 0.785 | -0.023 |
始节数 Number of the first branch | -0.627 | 0.585 | -0.147 |
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.878 | -0.026 | 0.286 |
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.895 | 0.057 | 0.206 |
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.722 | 0.214 | -0.55 |
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.811 | 0.239 | -0.407 |
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | -0.451 | -0.218 | 0.182 |
衣分Lint percentage(%) | -0.379 | -0.235 | -0.051 |
特征值Eigenvable | 3.829 | 1.397 | 1.162 |
贡献率Contribution rate(%) | 42.545 | 15.519 | 12.913 |
累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate(%) | 42.545 | 58.064 | 70.977 |
项目Item | 成分1 | 成分2 | 成分3 | 成分4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height(cm) | 0.282 | -0.066 | -0.882 | 0.252 |
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.655 | 0.463 | 0.381 | 0.331 |
始节数 Number of the first branch | -0.698 | 0.343 | -0.037 | 0.075 |
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.82 | 0.389 | -0.044 | -0.028 |
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.819 | 0.443 | -0.039 | 0.101 |
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.742 | -0.288 | 0.258 | 0.382 |
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.756 | -0.095 | 0.413 | 0.275 |
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | 0.426 | 0.111 | 0.125 | -0.846 |
衣分 Lint percentage (%) | -0.149 | -0.798 | 0.109 | -0.042 |
特征值 Eigenvable | 3.664 | 1.424 | 1.194 | 1.128 |
贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 40.713 | 15.821 | 13.264 | 12.538 |
累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate(%) | 40.713 | 56.534 | 69.798 | 82.335 |
Table 6 Principal component loading matrix of LH populations
项目Item | 成分1 | 成分2 | 成分3 | 成分4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height(cm) | 0.282 | -0.066 | -0.882 | 0.252 |
始节高 Height of the first branch(cm) | -0.655 | 0.463 | 0.381 | 0.331 |
始节数 Number of the first branch | -0.698 | 0.343 | -0.037 | 0.075 |
果枝数 Fruit branch number | 0.82 | 0.389 | -0.044 | -0.028 |
有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch | 0.819 | 0.443 | -0.039 | 0.101 |
总铃数 Boll number per plant | 0.742 | -0.288 | 0.258 | 0.382 |
有效成铃数 Effective boll number per | 0.756 | -0.095 | 0.413 | 0.275 |
单铃重 Single bell weight(g) | 0.426 | 0.111 | 0.125 | -0.846 |
衣分 Lint percentage (%) | -0.149 | -0.798 | 0.109 | -0.042 |
特征值 Eigenvable | 3.664 | 1.424 | 1.194 | 1.128 |
贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 40.713 | 15.821 | 13.264 | 12.538 |
累积贡献率 Accumulative contribution rate(%) | 40.713 | 56.534 | 69.798 | 82.335 |
[1] | 齐子杰, 陈荣江, 高产棉花植株形态性状及产量构成因素选育模式的探讨[J]. 河南农业科学, 2010,(1):32-35. |
QI Zijie, CHEN Rongjiang. Research on the Selection Mode in High-yield Cotton Plant Morphology and Yield Components Traits[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2010,(1): 32-35. | |
[2] | 朱建东, 中、早熟陆地棉与海岛棉杂交种主要性状遗传效应比较分析[D], 新乡: 河南科技学院, 2012. |
ZHU Jiandong. Comparative analysis on genetic effects of main characters of medium early maturing upland cotton and island cotton hybrids[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Institue of Science and Technology, 2012. | |
[3] | 梁维维, 海陆杂交后代群体的遗传分析[D], 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学. 2013. |
LIANG Weiwei. Genetic analysis of land sea hybrid progeny population[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2013. | |
[4] | 张凯, 鲁宁宁, 陈伟, 等, 棉花杂交组合F1、F2高产优质性状分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2018. 45(10): 22-27. |
ZHANG Kai, LU Ningning, CHEN Wei, et al. Comparative Analysis on High Yield and Fine Quality Traits in F1 and F2 of Cotton Hybrid Combinations[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(10): 22-27. | |
[5] |
王天友, 冯春晖, 王有武, 等, 海岛棉不同果枝类型杂交F2代产量品质性状分布规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020. 57(2): 209-218.
DOI |
WANG Tianyou, FENG Chunhui, WANG Youwu, et al. Study on the Distribution of Yield and Quality Traits and Their Correlations in F2 Generation Island Cottons with Different Fruit Branches[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2): 209-218.
DOI |
|
[6] | 齐海坤, 严根土, 王宁, 等, 机采棉杂交后代主要株型性状与产量和品质的关系[J]. 棉花学报, 2017. 29(5): 456-465. |
QI Haikun, YAN Genshi, WANG Ning, et al. Relation of Plant Type Traits with Fiber Yield and Quality in the Crossing Population of Mechanical-Harvested Cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(5): 456-465. | |
[7] | 张小全, 王学德, 细胞质雄性不育陆地棉与海岛棉间杂种优势初步研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2005. 17(2): 79-83. |
ZHANG Xiaoquan, WANG Xuede, Preliminary Study on Heterosis of Interspecific Hybrid Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum×G.barbadense) Based on Cytoplasmic Male-sterility System[J]. Cotton Science, 2005, 17(2): 79-83. | |
[8] | 郭景红, 北疆自育杂交棉F1、F2代高产性状研究及F2代推广应用前景分析[D], 石河子: 石河子大学. 2013. |
GUO Jinghong. Study on high yield characters of F1 and F2 generation of self bred hybrid cotton in North Xinjiang and analysis of application prospect of F2 generation[D]. Shihezi, Shihezi University, 2013. | |
[9] | 李瑞莲, 陈金湘, 刘爱玉, 杂交棉F2 代利用研究进展[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004,(3): 298-302. |
LI Ruilian, CHEN Jinxiang, LIU Aiyu, hybrid cotton F2 Progress in the research of the second generation utilization[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2004,(3): 298-302. | |
[10] | 陈娇, 甘露, 罗兰, 等, 粘糯杂交后代主要农艺性状遗传变异及相关性和主成分分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019. 47(6): 33-35,38. |
CHEN Jiao, GAN Lu, LUO Lan, et al., Genetic Variation and Correlation Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits in Hybrid Offspring of Glutinous×Non-glutinous[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019. 47(6): 33-35,38. | |
[11] | 罗霆, 岑华飞, 黄玉新, 等, 不同亲本细胞质源对甘蔗杂交后代主要性状的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015. 36(3): 516-522. |
LUO Ting, CEN Huafei, HUANG Yuxin, et al. Effects of different parental cytoplasmic sources on main characters of sugarcane hybrid progenies[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015. 36(3): 516-522. | |
[12] | 黄世文, 王玲, 王全永, 等, 水稻品种ZH5及其杂交后代纹枯病抗性和农艺性状研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2008, 23(4): 7-11. |
HUANG Shiwen, WANG Ling, WANG Quanyong, et al. Studies on Sheath Blight Resistance and Biological Characters of Rice Variety ZH5 and Its Filial Generations[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2008, 23(4): 7-11. | |
[13] | 齐子杰, 陈荣江, 高产棉花植株形态性状及产量构成因素选育模式的探讨[J]. 河南农业科学, 2010(1): 32-35. |
QI Zijie, CHEN Rongjiang, Research on the Selection Mode in High-yield Cotton Plant Morphology and Yield Components Traits[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2010(1): 32-35. | |
[14] | 冯常辉, 吴继洪, 孟艳艳, 等, 杂交棉种子产业发展的现状和策略[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011. 50(23): 4974-4977. |
FENG Changhui, WU Jihong, MENG Yanyan, et al. Current Status and Strategies for Developing Hybrid Cotton Seed Industry in China[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 50 (23): 4974-4977. | |
[15] | 陈旭升, 狄佳春, 赵亮. 抗虫海陆杂交棉主要经济性状的杂种优势分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019. 31(5): 1-5. |
CHEN Xusheng, DI Jiachun, ZHAO Liang. Heterosis Analysis of Main Economic Characters of Insect-resistant Hybrid Combinations between Upland Cotton and Sea-island Cotton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2019, 31(5): 1-5. | |
[16] | 张亚黎, 姚贺盛, 罗毅, 等, 海岛棉和陆地棉叶片光合能力的差异及限制因素[J]. 生态学报, 2011. 31(7): 1803-1810. |
ZHANG Yali, YAO Hesheng, LUO Yi, et al. Difference in leaf photosynthetic capacity between pima cotton(Gossypium barbadense)and upland cotton(G.hirsutum)and analysis of potential constraints[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(7): 1803-1810. | |
[17] | 孔广超, 秦利, 徐海明, 等, 棉花IF_2群体构建及其在纤维品质遗传和杂种优势研究中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2010. 36(6): 940-944. |
KONG Guangchao, QIN Li, XU Haiming, et al. Construction of IF2 Population and Its Application in Studies on Genetic Effects and Heterosis for Fiber Quality in Upland Cotton (G hirsutum L.)[J]. Acta Crops Sinica, 2010, 36 (6): 940-944. |
[1] | ZENG Wanying, GENG Hongwei, CHENG Yukun, LI Sizhong, QIAN Songting, GAO Weishi, ZHANG Liming. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance during the rapid growth stage of sugar beet cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[2] | CHEN Yong, ZHOU Lei, SUI Chun, LIN Caixia. The characteristics of 32 cultivated germplasms of Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus in Xinjiang production area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314. |
[3] | MIAO Yu, CHEN Cuixia, MA Yanming, XING Guofang, DONG Yusheng, CHEN Zhijun, WANG Xian, XIANG Li. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of 276 Central Asian barley germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895. |
[4] | HU Huabing, SUN Linlin, LIU Jianxiong, HE Biwei, LIU Xun, HUAN Tin, LI Youfang. Correlation analysis of sugar accumulation and temperature in sugar beet under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1916-1925. |
[5] | YE Pingyi, LONG Yilei, TANG Yanping, DU Xiao, AN Mengjie, TAO Zhixin, LIANG Farui, AI Xiantao, HU Shoulin. Identification and evaluation of fruit branch angle and machine-picked agronomic traits in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1318-1327. |
[6] | LIU Yue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, YU Yuehua, WANG Runqi, LI Dandan, SHI Shubing. Comparison of peanut varieties with different high oleic acid under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1361-1367. |
[7] | GAO Mutian, XIAO Yanmei, LIAO Zhijie, HUANG Cheng. Comprehensive evaluation of kernel and quality traits in maize-teosinte introgression line population [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 885-891. |
[8] | Mahemuti Abulaiti, Muhetaer zhare, Mireguli Waili, Hadier Yishake. Correlation and regression analysis between leaf margin scorch diseases and leaf nutrient content of walnut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 945-953. |
[9] | LI Xiaojuan, ZHAO Wenju, GA Sang, DENG Changrong, ZHAO Mengliang, REN Yanjing. Analysis of turnip nutrient at different altitudes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 652-664. |
[10] | WANG Jijiao, PAN Yue, WANG Shiwei, HAN Zhengwei, MA Yong, HU Haifang, WANG Baoqing. Canonical correlation analysis of soil nutrients and the quality of Beibinghong grape juice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 355-364. |
[11] | YANG Cunming, ZHANG Xiaoxue, ZHANG Menghua, ZHAO Zhiwen, LI Fengjie, HUANG Xixia, LI Jie, Aizimaiti Awuti, HE Junmin, LI Xue, LI Tingting, TANG Li, ZHANG Wenjing, TIAN Yuezhen, TIAN Kechuan. Analysis of correlation and difference of target traits in fine wool sheep breeding [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 514-520. |
[12] | YANG Xiangbo, CHEN Liangyu, YANG Songnan, CHEN Xifeng, XING Weiming, LI Xueying, CONG Weixuan, ZANG Zhenyuan, ZANG Yuanbo, ZHANG Jun. Phenotype analysis and comprehensive evaluation of spring soybean germplasm resources from northeast China [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2921-2933. |
[13] | LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, GAO Yuan, MA Quanhui, LI Zhiguo, MA Xing. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on diurnal changes of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of sand-cultivated tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3006-3013. |
[14] | XU Bin, WANG Zheng, SONG Zhanteng, Merhaba Paerhati, ZHU Jingrong, CHE Fengbin, LI Yonghai, WU Fengyan, MIAO Fuhong. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031. |
[15] | MA Yuejun, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, WU Hui, ZHANG Qiaoqiao, DU Jiageng, WANG Qi, CUI Hewei, MA Xing. Effects of different matrix ratios and anvil combinations on cucumber growth and development [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2635-2647. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 51
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 205
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||