Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (10): 1876-1881.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.10.014
• Chemical Fertilizer and Pesticide Application Reduction for Cotton • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yaling GENG, Yaofa LI, Zhiying HUN, Hua WANG, Tingting TIAN, Linghui WANG, Hongjun JIA, Libing YUAN()
Received:
2021-03-15
Online:
2021-10-20
Published:
2021-10-26
Correspondence author:
Libing YUAN
Supported by:
耿亚玲, 李耀发, 浑之英, 王华, 田婷婷, 王玲慧, 贾宏军, 袁立兵()
通讯作者:
袁立兵
作者简介:
耿亚玲(1982-),女,硕士,研究方向为农田杂草防治及除草剂毒理,(E-mail) gengyaling2006@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yaling GENG, Yaofa LI, Zhiying HUN, Hua WANG, Tingting TIAN, Linghui WANG, Hongjun JIA, Libing YUAN. Investigation of Weed Varieties and Screening of Control Agents in Cotton Fields[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1876-1881.
耿亚玲, 李耀发, 浑之英, 王华, 田婷婷, 王玲慧, 贾宏军, 袁立兵. 冀南棉田杂草发生种类及防治药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1876-1881.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.10.014
处理 编号 NO. | 供试药剂 Herbicide | 有效成分用量 Dosage (g a.i./hm2) |
---|---|---|
1 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚 | 990+216 |
2 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚 | 1 980+432 |
3 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净 | 990+1125 |
4 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净 | 1 980+2250 |
5 | 二甲戊灵+丙炔氟草胺 | 990+60 |
6 | 二甲戊灵+丙炔氟草胺 | 1 980+120 |
7 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+乙氧氟草醚 | 990+1 125+216 |
8 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+乙氧氟草醚 | 1 980+2 250+432 |
9 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚+丙炔氟草胺 | 990+216+60 |
10 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚+丙炔氟草胺 | 1 980+432+120 |
11 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+丙炔氟草胺 | 990+1 125+60 |
12 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+丙炔氟草胺 | 1 980+2 250+120 |
13 | 空白对照 | - |
Table 1 Test design of test chemicals
处理 编号 NO. | 供试药剂 Herbicide | 有效成分用量 Dosage (g a.i./hm2) |
---|---|---|
1 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚 | 990+216 |
2 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚 | 1 980+432 |
3 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净 | 990+1125 |
4 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净 | 1 980+2250 |
5 | 二甲戊灵+丙炔氟草胺 | 990+60 |
6 | 二甲戊灵+丙炔氟草胺 | 1 980+120 |
7 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+乙氧氟草醚 | 990+1 125+216 |
8 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+乙氧氟草醚 | 1 980+2 250+432 |
9 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚+丙炔氟草胺 | 990+216+60 |
10 | 二甲戊灵+乙氧氟草醚+丙炔氟草胺 | 1 980+432+120 |
11 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+丙炔氟草胺 | 990+1 125+60 |
12 | 二甲戊灵+扑草净+丙炔氟草胺 | 1 980+2 250+120 |
13 | 空白对照 | - |
杂草种类 Weed species | 相对密度 Relative density (%) | 相对频度 Relative frequency (%) | 相对均度 Relative uniformity (%) | 相对多度 Relative abundance (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
藜 Chenopodium album | 11.01 | 11.35 | 24.78 | 47.13 |
反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus | 12.81 | 8.51 | 6.88 | 28.20 |
马齿苋 Portulaca oleracea | 6.95 | 9.93 | 9.91 | 26.79 |
铁苋菜 Acalypha australis | 6.74 | 9.93 | 8.40 | 25.07 |
鳢肠 Eclipta prostrata | 8.91 | 7.80 | 7.43 | 24.14 |
山苦荬 Ixeris chinensis | 2.18 | 9.22 | 8.53 | 19.93 |
牛筋草 Eleusine indica | 11.09 | 4.26 | 3.03 | 18.37 |
芦苇 Phragmites australis | 7.38 | 3.55 | 5.51 | 16.43 |
白鳞莎草 Cyperus nipponicus | 11.28 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 15.61 |
龙葵 Solanum nigrum | 1.35 | 5.67 | 4.96 | 11.98 |
马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis | 1.30 | 6.38 | 3.58 | 11.26 |
狗尾草 Setaria viridis | 9.04 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 10.57 |
地锦 Euphorbia humifusa | 1.28 | 6.38 | 2.13 | 9.79 |
田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis | 5.43 | 0.71 | 1.38 | 7.52 |
打碗花 Calystegia hederacea | 1.44 | 2.13 | 3.58 | 7.14 |
野西瓜苗 Hibiscus trionum | 0.34 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 4.67 |
裂叶牵牛 Pharbitis nil | 0.26 | 2.84 | 1.38 | 4.48 |
稗 Echinochloa crusgalli | 0.12 | 2.13 | 1.10 | 3.35 |
虎尾草 Chloris virgata | 0.26 | 1.42 | 0.55 | 2.23 |
苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 1.61 |
鹅绒藤 Cynanchum chinense | 0.03 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.02 |
苍耳 Xanthium sibiricum | 0.03 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.01 |
播娘蒿 Descurainia sophia | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.01 |
Table 2 Species and damage of weeds in cotton fields of southern Hebei province
杂草种类 Weed species | 相对密度 Relative density (%) | 相对频度 Relative frequency (%) | 相对均度 Relative uniformity (%) | 相对多度 Relative abundance (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
藜 Chenopodium album | 11.01 | 11.35 | 24.78 | 47.13 |
反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus | 12.81 | 8.51 | 6.88 | 28.20 |
马齿苋 Portulaca oleracea | 6.95 | 9.93 | 9.91 | 26.79 |
铁苋菜 Acalypha australis | 6.74 | 9.93 | 8.40 | 25.07 |
鳢肠 Eclipta prostrata | 8.91 | 7.80 | 7.43 | 24.14 |
山苦荬 Ixeris chinensis | 2.18 | 9.22 | 8.53 | 19.93 |
牛筋草 Eleusine indica | 11.09 | 4.26 | 3.03 | 18.37 |
芦苇 Phragmites australis | 7.38 | 3.55 | 5.51 | 16.43 |
白鳞莎草 Cyperus nipponicus | 11.28 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 15.61 |
龙葵 Solanum nigrum | 1.35 | 5.67 | 4.96 | 11.98 |
马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis | 1.30 | 6.38 | 3.58 | 11.26 |
狗尾草 Setaria viridis | 9.04 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 10.57 |
地锦 Euphorbia humifusa | 1.28 | 6.38 | 2.13 | 9.79 |
田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis | 5.43 | 0.71 | 1.38 | 7.52 |
打碗花 Calystegia hederacea | 1.44 | 2.13 | 3.58 | 7.14 |
野西瓜苗 Hibiscus trionum | 0.34 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 4.67 |
裂叶牵牛 Pharbitis nil | 0.26 | 2.84 | 1.38 | 4.48 |
稗 Echinochloa crusgalli | 0.12 | 2.13 | 1.10 | 3.35 |
虎尾草 Chloris virgata | 0.26 | 1.42 | 0.55 | 2.23 |
苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 1.61 |
鹅绒藤 Cynanchum chinense | 0.03 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.02 |
苍耳 Xanthium sibiricum | 0.03 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.01 |
播娘蒿 Descurainia sophia | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.01 |
处理 编号 No. | 藜 Chenopodium album L. | 反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus L. | 铁苋菜 Acalypha australis L. | 马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis L. | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | |
1 | 88.07a | 88.00a | 86.96ab | 81.74a | 85.71a | 80.01a | 83.33a | 88.01ab | 68.73b | 90.74a | 91.19a | 82.57a |
2 | 93.68a | 92.00a | 91.31ab | 85.62a | 89.52a | 90.00a | 85.17a | 86.01ab | 81.24ab | 93.54a | 95.15a | 84.40a |
3 | 89.00a | 86.66a | 78.27ab | 85.16a | 88.89a | 85.01a | 81.48a | 89.01ab | 81.24ab | 91.88a | 93.39a | 81.65a |
4 | 95.82a | 93.32a | 91.31ab | 87.49a | 90.48a | 90.00a | 88.89a | 90.01ab | 87.49ab | 94.44a | 94.71a | 87.15a |
5 | 85.71a | 86.71a | 73.92b | 83.15a | 82.43a | 85.01a | 87.04a | 86.01ab | 74.98ab | 90.28a | 90.09a | 78.90a |
6 | 92.50a | 93.33a | 91.31ab | 91.63a | 93.65a | 95.00a | 88.89a | 82.01b | 87.49ab | 93.11a | 94.47a | 88.99a |
7 | 92.76a | 94.66a | 91.31ab | 93.47a | 98.43a | 95.00a | 90.83a | 94.00ab | 93.75ab | 94.44a | 94.27a | 90.82a |
8 | 96.43a | 96.00a | 95.65a | 95.30a | 98.43a | 100.00a | 92.59a | 100.00a | 100.00a | 95.84a | 96.48a | 93.58a |
9 | 84.52a | 85.33a | 82.62ab | 92.47a | 93.65a | 90.00a | 85.17a | 72.02b | 74.98ab | 91.67a | 90.31a | 82.57a |
10 | 91.18a | 92.00a | 91.31ab | 94.12a | 96.83a | 100.00a | 87.02a | 90.01ab | 81.24ab | 95.38a | 95.60a | 86.24a |
11 | 88.78a | 85.33a | 78.27ab | 90.11a | 89.68a | 85.01a | 89.15a | 92.01ab | 81.24ab | 91.34a | 92.51a | 83.48a |
12 | 96.43a | 92.00a | 86.96ab | 94.14a | 96.83a | 95.00a | 92.59a | 92.03ab | 93.75ab | 95.27a | 95.50a | 90.82a |
Table 3 Quantity control effect of mixed spraying of different soil treatment agents on weeds in cotton field(%)
处理 编号 No. | 藜 Chenopodium album L. | 反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus L. | 铁苋菜 Acalypha australis L. | 马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis L. | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | |
1 | 88.07a | 88.00a | 86.96ab | 81.74a | 85.71a | 80.01a | 83.33a | 88.01ab | 68.73b | 90.74a | 91.19a | 82.57a |
2 | 93.68a | 92.00a | 91.31ab | 85.62a | 89.52a | 90.00a | 85.17a | 86.01ab | 81.24ab | 93.54a | 95.15a | 84.40a |
3 | 89.00a | 86.66a | 78.27ab | 85.16a | 88.89a | 85.01a | 81.48a | 89.01ab | 81.24ab | 91.88a | 93.39a | 81.65a |
4 | 95.82a | 93.32a | 91.31ab | 87.49a | 90.48a | 90.00a | 88.89a | 90.01ab | 87.49ab | 94.44a | 94.71a | 87.15a |
5 | 85.71a | 86.71a | 73.92b | 83.15a | 82.43a | 85.01a | 87.04a | 86.01ab | 74.98ab | 90.28a | 90.09a | 78.90a |
6 | 92.50a | 93.33a | 91.31ab | 91.63a | 93.65a | 95.00a | 88.89a | 82.01b | 87.49ab | 93.11a | 94.47a | 88.99a |
7 | 92.76a | 94.66a | 91.31ab | 93.47a | 98.43a | 95.00a | 90.83a | 94.00ab | 93.75ab | 94.44a | 94.27a | 90.82a |
8 | 96.43a | 96.00a | 95.65a | 95.30a | 98.43a | 100.00a | 92.59a | 100.00a | 100.00a | 95.84a | 96.48a | 93.58a |
9 | 84.52a | 85.33a | 82.62ab | 92.47a | 93.65a | 90.00a | 85.17a | 72.02b | 74.98ab | 91.67a | 90.31a | 82.57a |
10 | 91.18a | 92.00a | 91.31ab | 94.12a | 96.83a | 100.00a | 87.02a | 90.01ab | 81.24ab | 95.38a | 95.60a | 86.24a |
11 | 88.78a | 85.33a | 78.27ab | 90.11a | 89.68a | 85.01a | 89.15a | 92.01ab | 81.24ab | 91.34a | 92.51a | 83.48a |
12 | 96.43a | 92.00a | 86.96ab | 94.14a | 96.83a | 95.00a | 92.59a | 92.03ab | 93.75ab | 95.27a | 95.50a | 90.82a |
处理编号 No. | 藜 Chenopodium album L. | 反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus L. | 铁苋菜 Acalypha australis L. | 马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis L. | 平均鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 84.62abc | 91.11a | 67.95b | 73.33a | 79.25b |
2 | 97.46ab | 94.44a | 78.23ab | 84.17a | 88.57ab |
3 | 85.90abc | 92.67a | 83.68ab | 83.69a | 86.49b |
4 | 96.15abc | 95.78a | 93.98ab | 86.67a | 93.15ab |
5 | 82.05c | 86.67a | 75.00ab | 82.68a | 81.60b |
6 | 93.08abc | 97.78a | 85.07ab | 82.96a | 89.72ab |
7 | 95.64abc | 95.56a | 98.02a | 85.99a | 93.80ab |
8 | 98.72a | 100.00a | 100a | 86.67a | 96.35a |
9 | 88.12abc | 88.89a | 86.32ab | 84.72a | 87.01ab |
10 | 93.72abc | 100.00a | 91.07ab | 83.85a | 92.16ab |
11 | 82.31c | 84.44a | 83.33ab | 73.33a | 80.85b |
12 | 83.91bc | 93.33a | 95.75ab | 88.05a | 90.26ab |
Table 4 Effect of different soil treatment agents on fresh weight control of weeds in cotton field(%)
处理编号 No. | 藜 Chenopodium album L. | 反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus L. | 铁苋菜 Acalypha australis L. | 马唐 Digitaria sanguinalis L. | 平均鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 84.62abc | 91.11a | 67.95b | 73.33a | 79.25b |
2 | 97.46ab | 94.44a | 78.23ab | 84.17a | 88.57ab |
3 | 85.90abc | 92.67a | 83.68ab | 83.69a | 86.49b |
4 | 96.15abc | 95.78a | 93.98ab | 86.67a | 93.15ab |
5 | 82.05c | 86.67a | 75.00ab | 82.68a | 81.60b |
6 | 93.08abc | 97.78a | 85.07ab | 82.96a | 89.72ab |
7 | 95.64abc | 95.56a | 98.02a | 85.99a | 93.80ab |
8 | 98.72a | 100.00a | 100a | 86.67a | 96.35a |
9 | 88.12abc | 88.89a | 86.32ab | 84.72a | 87.01ab |
10 | 93.72abc | 100.00a | 91.07ab | 83.85a | 92.16ab |
11 | 82.31c | 84.44a | 83.33ab | 73.33a | 80.85b |
12 | 83.91bc | 93.33a | 95.75ab | 88.05a | 90.26ab |
[1] | 马小艳, 马艳, 彭军, 等. 我国棉田杂草研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 棉花学报, 2010, 22(4):372-380. |
MA Xiaoyan, MA Yan, PENG Jun, et al. Current situation and developing tendency of the weed researches in cotton field of China[J]. Cotton Science, 2010, 22(4):372-380. | |
[2] | 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[DB/OL]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020 [2021.01.25]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm. |
National bureau of statistics of China. China statistical yearbook [DB/OL]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020 [2021.01.25]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm. | |
[3] | 河北省人民政府. 河北经济年鉴[J]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018: 207-231. |
The People’S Government of Hebei Province. Hebei Economic Yearbook [J]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2018: 207-231. | |
[4] | 樊翠芹, 王贵启, 李秉华, 等. 河北省棉田杂草发生规律及化学防除[J]. 河北农业科学, 2009, 13(10):23-25. |
FAN Cuiqin, WANG Guiqi, LI Binghua, et al. Occurrence regularity and chemical control measures of weeds in cotton field in Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 13(10):23-25. | |
[5] | 马小艳, 刘春琴, 李晋宇, 等. 河北省沧州地区棉田杂草群落特征[J]. 杂草科学, 2014, 32(1):42-45. |
MA Xiaoyan, LIU Chunqin, LI Jinyu, et al. Characterization of weed communities in cotton fields of Cangzhou area in Hebei Province[J]. Weed Science, 2014, 32(1):42-45.
DOI URL |
|
[6] | 张强, 田英, 朱玉永, 等. 新疆兵团主要植棉区机采棉田杂草调查[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(5):13-16. |
ZHANG Qiang, TIAN Ying, ZHU Yuyong, et al. Investigation on weeds in machine harvested cotton field in main cotton planting areas of Xinjiang Production and construction corps[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(5):13-16. | |
[7] | 魏建华, 张建云, 马冬梅. 新疆昌吉州棉田杂草发生演替规律调查研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(1):31-33. |
WEI Jianhua, ZHANG Jianyun, MA Dongmei. Investigation and study on law of succession of weeds in cotton fields in Changji, Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2016, 43(1):31-33. | |
[8] | 郝彦俊, 李广阔, 王剑, 等. 新疆棉田杂草发生及防治[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2003, 40(1):24-25. |
HAO Yanjun, LI Guangkuo, WANG Jian, et al. Occurrence and control of weed in cotton fields in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2003, 40(1):24-25. | |
[9] | 赵娜娜, 冯佳楠, 王盼盼, 等. 34% 丙炔氟草胺·二甲戊灵乳油对棉田阔叶杂草的防除效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4):779-784. |
ZHAO Nana, FENG Jianan, WANG Panpan, et al. Field efficacy of 34% flumioxazin·pendimethalin EC on broadleaved weeds in cotton field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4):779-784. | |
[10] | 谭金妮. 丙炔氟草胺防除棉田杂草的应用研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018. |
TAN Jinni. Study on the application of flumioxazin controlling weeds in cotton field[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[11] | 张朝贤, 胡祥恩, 钱益新, 等. 江汉平原麦田杂草调查[J]. 植物保护, 1998, 24(3):14-16. |
ZHANG Chaoxian, HU Xiangen, QIAN Yixin, et al. Weed survey in wheat fields in Jianghan Plain[J]. Plant Protection, 1998, 24(3):14-16. | |
[12] | 高新菊, 王恒亮, 马毅辉, 等. 河南省小麦田杂草组成及群落特征[J]. 植物保护学报, 2016, 43(4):697-704. |
GAO Xinju, WANG Hengliang, MA Yihui, et al. Species composition and characterization of weed communities in wheat fields in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2016, 43(4):697-704. | |
[13] | 赵冰梅, 丁丽丽, 张强, 等. 42%氟啶草酮悬浮剂桶混二甲戊灵对覆膜棉田恶性杂草防除效果及安全性[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(2):33-36, 43. |
ZHAO Bingmei, DING Lili, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of a tank mixture with fluridone 42% SC plus pendimethalin for controlling malignant weeds in mulched cotton field[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(2):33-36, 43. | |
[14] | 周文冠, 孟永杰, 陈锋, 等. 除草剂研发及其复混使用的现状与展望[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(1):93-105. |
ZHOU Wenguan, MENG Yongjie, CHEN Feng, et al. Current status and research progress of development and tankmix application of herbicides[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(1):93-105. | |
[15] |
Green J M. Current state of herbicides in herbicide-resistant crops[J]. Pest Management Science, 2014, 70(9):1351-1357.
DOI URL |
[16] |
Wiederholt R J, Stoltenberg D E. Cross-resistance of a large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) accession to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides[J]. Weed Technology, 1995, 9(3):518-524.
DOI URL |
[17] | 李欢欢, 马小艳, 姜伟丽, 等. 棉田化学除草现状及对策[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(5):1-7, 10. |
LI Huanhuan, MA Xiaoyan, JIANG Weili, et al. Current status and countermeasure of chemical weeding in cotton fields[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(5):1-7, 10. | |
[18] | 王兆振. 山东棉田杂草发生规律及化学防除研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014. |
WANG Zhaozhen. Study on occurrence regularity and chemical control measures of weeds in cotton fields in Shandong province[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014. |
[1] | LIU Ping, ZHANG Kai, MA Chao, ZHANG Hui, YANG Chuan. Evaluation of the comprehensive efficiency of cotton field with different phosphate fertilizer dosage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2521-2531. |
[2] | MA Bin, WANG Shuai, WU Yiyan, JIANG Yan. Study on the Tire Effect of Farmland Shelter Forest in Arid Desert Area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2232-2239. |
[3] | ZHANG Donghai, WEI Junmei, CHEN Bing, JI Guangpeng, WANG Fan, NIU Linglei. Evaluation on Effects of Herbicide Sprayed on Cotton Fields before Sowing by UAV [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 3022-3029. |
[4] | WANG Dongmei, PAN Hongsheng, LI Haiqiang, DING Ruifeng, Akedan Wuwaishi, LIU Jian, LI Haobin. Quantitatively Evaluate the Control Function of Predatory Natural Enemies on Cotton Aphids by DNA Molecular Detection Technology [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2661-2667. |
[5] | LI Jiangyu, ZHAO Qiang, WU Xueqin, MA Chunmei, REN Ruofei, XU Doudou, TIAN Yanqing. Effects of Moulding Agent on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2352-2357. |
[6] | SU Panlong, LI Tao, LIU Xinyuan, WU Cailan, YANG Desong. The Control Effect, Herbicidal Spectrum and Safety Evaluation of 42% Fluridone Compounded with 33% Pendimethalin EC on Weeds in Cotton Fields [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 162-169. |
[7] | GAO Wencui, YANG Weijun, SHI Chunling, CHEN Lei. Study on Soil Organic Carbon and Its Change of Activity in Continuous Cropping Cotton Field under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1603-1609. |
[8] | ZHU Yuyong, ZHAO Bingmei, ZHANG Qiang, DING Lili, MA Jiangfeng, LI Xianchao, JIAN Ying, WANG Lin, WANG Xueyi, JIAO Wenkai. Preliminary Study of 4 Spray-adjuvants on The Reduction of Herbicide Application in Cotton Fields of Early Maturing Cotton Region in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(7): 1291-1296. |
[9] | WU Yiyan, MA Bin, JIANG Yan. Influence of Typical Desert Farmland Shelter Forest on Soil Water and Salt Dynamics in Cotton Fields [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(6): 1012-1020. |
[10] | GENG Yaling, HUN Zhiying, WANG Hua, DING Xiangqi, TIAN Tingting, WANG Linghui, YUAN Libing. Sensitivity of Major Weeds to the 9 Kinds of Herbicides in Wheat Field in Hebei Province, China [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2327-2333. |
[11] | Shulin WANG, Yan WANG, Ming DONG, Hong QI, Guoyi FENG, Xiaopeng LEI, Qinglong LIANG, Qian ZHANG. Effects of P Fertilizer Amount on Soil P2O5 Content, P Uptake in Cotton Plant and Cotton Yields after 6 Years of Located Fertilization [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1882-1886. |
[12] | WANG Fangbin, LIU Kai, SUN Jialin, YIN Xin, HOU Zhenan. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction on NH3 Volatilization, Nutrient Uptake and Cotton Yield in Drip-irrigated Cotton Fields [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9): 1746-1753. |
[13] | ZHANG Qian, WANG Shulin, QI Hong, LI Yan, WANG Yan, FENG Guoyi, LIANG Qinglong, LEI Xiaopeng, LIN Yongzeng. Effects of Spraying Adjuvants on Reduction and Synergism of Herbicides in Cotton Field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(6): 1159-1165. |
[14] | XU Lina, WU Chenyuan, HU Fei, ZHOU Ziyan, HU Benjing. Effects of Tetraniliprole on the Control of Spodoptera litura in Cotton Fields [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(6): 1090-1094. |
[15] | ZHANG Hang 1, LIN Ning1,2, CHEN Li1,3, FU Kai-yun1, JIN Ping4, LIU En-liang4, GAO Hai-feng1. Preliminary Study on Weed Species Composition and Community Characteristics in Sweet Potato Field in Desert Oasis Region of Southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 2079-2089. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||