基于品种和氮肥的棉花叶色值、叶片氮含量及产量估测

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.08.010

新疆农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (8): 1459-1468.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.08.010

• 作物遗传育种·物质资源·分子生物学 • 上一篇下一篇

基于品种和氮肥的棉花叶色值、叶片氮含量及产量估测

印彩霞, 张泽, 苏维, 南小琴, 谭红, 吕新

石河子大学农学院/新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000

收稿日期:2019-06-11 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-10-10
通信作者: 吕新(1964-),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为农业信息化与精准农业,(E-mail)lxshz@126.com
作者简介:印彩霞(1994-),女,博士研究生,研究方向为作物信息技术与精准栽培,(E-mail)1791533712@qq.com
基金资助:
兵团重大科技项目(2018AA004);新疆生产建设兵团应用基础研究计划项目(2016AG002)

Estimation of Leaf Color Value, Leaf Nitrogen Content and Yield of Cotton Based on Variety and Nitrogen Fertilizer

YIN Cai-xia, ZHANG Ze, SU Wei, NAN Xiao-qin, TAN Hong, LÜ Xin

Key Laboratory of Oasis Eco-agriculture of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps / College of Agronomy, Shihezi University, Shihezi Xinjiang 832000, China

Received:2019-06-11 Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-10-10
Correspondence author: LÜ Xin(1964- ), male, Professor, Doctoral supervisor, research field: Mainly engaged in agricultural informatization and precision agriculture research,(E-mail) lxshz @126.com
Supported by:
Supported by the Major S & T Research Project of XPCC(2018AA004)and the Basic Application Research Program Project (2016AG002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】棉花叶色和叶片氮含量在各生育时期的变化规律,研究叶色、叶片氮含量与产量的相关性,基于棉花叶色和叶片氮含量的产量估测。【方法】以新陆早45号、新陆早58号、新陆早62号、新陆早50号、鲁棉研24号为材料,设置4个施氮水平:N0(不施氮对照)、N1(120 kg/hm²)、N2(240 kg/hm²)、N3(360 kg/hm²),采用两因素完全随机区组设计,共20个处理,重复3次。【结果】(1)叶色值在全生育期变化趋势为吐絮期＞铃期＞花铃期＞盛蕾期＞现蕾期,叶片氮含量在全生育期变化趋势为花铃期＞铃期＞吐絮期＞现蕾期＞蕾期;(2)棉花叶色值、叶片氮含量、产量均呈线性正相关。其中棉花叶色值与叶片氮R²达0.37^**,叶色值与产量的R²达0.56^**,叶片氮含量与产量的R²达0.61^**;(3)通过产量对叶色值和叶片氮含量的响应特征,可基于二者实现棉花测产,产量估测方程为Y=363.48-65.175^*S+274.079^*N,R²达0.69(S指叶色值,N指叶片氮含量,Y指产量)。【结论】各棉花品种均在N3处理下产量最高,且通过叶色值和叶片氮含量实现棉花产量估测,在棉花测产中是较其它估产更精准的一种方法。

关键词: 棉花; 品种; 叶色值; 氮素; 产量

Abstract: 【Objective】 To determine the changes of cotton leaf color and leaf nitrogen content in different growth stages, to study the correlation between leaf color, leaf nitrogen content and yield, and to estimate the yield based on cotton leaf color and leaf nitrogen content.【Methods】Four nitrogen application levels were set up with Xinluzao 45, Xinluzao 58, Xinluo 62, Xinluzao 50 and Lumian 24 as materials: N0 (no nitrogen control), N1 (120 kg/hm²), N2 (240 kg/hm²), N3 (360 kg/hm²) and two factors completely randomized block design was used, a total of 20 treatments, repeated 3 times.【Result】(1)The results showed that the leaf color value changed during the whole growth period to the boll opening stage > the boll stage > the flowering boll stage > the bud stage > the squaring stage, and the leaf nitrogen content changed during the whole growth period to the flowering boll stage > the boll stage > the boll opening stage > the squaring > the bud stage; (2)There was a linear positive correlation among leaf color value, leaf nitrogen content and yield of cotton. Among them, cotton leaf color value and leaf nitrogen R² reached 0.37^**, leaf color value and yield R² reached 0.56^**, and leaf nitrogen content and yield R² reached 0.61^**. (3)Through the response characteristics of yield to leaf color value and leaf nitrogen content, cotton production could be realized based on the two. The yield estimation equation was Y=363.48-65. 175×S+274.079×N, and R² was up to 0.69 (S refers to leaf color value, N refers to leaf nitrogen content, Y refers to yield).【Conclusion】 The yield of each cotton variety was the highest under N3 treatment, and the cotton yield estimation was realized by leaf color value and leaf nitrogen content, which was a more accurate method than other methods in cotton yield measurement.

Key words: cotton; variety; leaf color value; nitrogen; yield

中图分类号:

S562
S143.1

印彩霞, 张泽, 苏维, 南小琴, 谭红, 吕新. 基于品种和氮肥的棉花叶色值、叶片氮含量及产量估测[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(8): 1459-1468.

YIN Cai-xia, ZHANG Ze, SU Wei, NAN Xiao-qin, TAN Hong, LÜ Xin. Estimation of Leaf Color Value, Leaf Nitrogen Content and Yield of Cotton Based on Variety and Nitrogen Fertilizer[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(8): 1459-1468.

参考文献

[1]Schepers, J. S. , Francis, D. D. , Vigil, M. , & Below, F. E. (1992). Comparison of corn leaf nitrogen concentration and chlorophyll meter readings. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 23(17-20):2,173-2,187.
[2] 赵全志,丁艳锋,王强盛,等.水稻叶色变化与氮素吸收的关系[J].中国农业科学,2006, 39(5): 916-921.
ZHAO Quan-zhi, DING Yan-feng, WANG Qiang-sheng, et al. (2006). The relationship between leaf color change and nitrogen uptake in rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 39(5): 916-921. (in Chinese)
[3] 宋绪忠,赵永军,张金凤,等.茶树叶片叶绿素含量与叶色值相关性研究[J].山东林业科技,2002,6(6):10-12.
SONG Xu-zhong, ZHAO Yong-jun, ZHANG Jin-feng, et al. (2002). Correlation between chlorophyll content and leaf color value of tea leaves [J]. Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 6(6):10-12. (in Chinese)
[4] 陆声链,汪丽萍,何火娇,等.基于相对叶绿素含量的黄瓜叶色仿真[J].农业机械学报,2014, 45(3):249,250-254.
LU Sheng-lian, WANG Li-ping, HE Huo-jiao, et al. (2014). Simulation of Cucumber Leaf Color Based on Relative Chlorophyll Content [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 45(3): 249, 250-254. (in Chinese)
[5] Kropff, M. J., Cassman, K. G. , Laar, H. H. , & Peng, S. (1993). Nitrogen and yield potential of irrigated rice. Plant and Soil,155-156(1):391-394.
[6] 朱新开,盛海君,顾晶,等.应用SPAD值预测小麦叶片叶绿素含量和氮含量的初步研究[J].麦类作物学报,2005, 25(2):46-50.
ZHU Xin-kai, SHENG Hai-jun, GU Jing, et al. (2005). Preliminary Study on Prediction of Chlorophyll Content and Nitrogen Content in Wheat Leaves Using SPAD Values [J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 25(2): 46-50. (in Chinese)
[7] 蔡红光,米国华,陈范骏,等.玉米叶片SPAD值与全氮及硝态氮含量的品种间变异[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(4):866-873.
CAI Hong-guang, MI Guo-hua, CHEN Fan-jun, et al. (2010). Variety between SPAD value and total nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen content in maize leaves [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 16(4): 866-873. (in Chinese)
[8] Smeal D, Zhang H. Chlorophyll meter evaluation for nitrogen management in corn [J]. Commun Soil Sci. Plant Ana1, 1994, 25(9-10): 1,495-1,503.
[9] Reiter, M. S. (2008). Cotton nitrogen management in a high- residue conservation system: source, rate, method, and timing. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72(5):1,330-1,336.
[10] 薛向荣.棉花功能叶不同位点SPAD值与植株氮素、施氮量相关性研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2013.
XUE Xiang-rong.Study on the correlation between SPAD value and nitrogen and nitrogen application rate in different functional leaves of cotton[D].Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University,2013.
[11] 王娟,韩登武,危常州,等.SPAD值与棉花叶绿素和含氮量关系的研究[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(3):167-170.
WANG Juan, HAN Deng-wu, WEI Chang-zhou, et al. (2006). Study on the relationship between SPAD value and cotton chlorophyll and nitrogen content [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 43(3):167-170. (in Chinese)
[12] 王绍华.水稻产量形成与叶片含氮量及叶色的关系[J].南京农业大学学报, 2002, 25(4):1-5.
WANG Shao-hua. (2002). Relationship between Rice Yield Formation and Leaf Nitrogen Content and Leaf Color [J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 25(4):1-5.(in Chinese)
[13] 汪玲,朱靖蓉,杨涛,等.氮肥施用策略对膜下滴灌棉花叶片叶绿素含量变化的影响[J].棉花学报,2010,22(5):454-459.
WANG Ling, ZHU Jing-rong, YANG Tao, et al. (2010). Effects of nitrogen application strategies on changes of chlorophyll content in cotton leaves under drip irrigation under film [J]. Journal of Cotton, 22(5): 454-459. (in Chinese)
[14] 罗新宁.施氮量对棉花叶位SPAD值的影响及棉花氮素营养诊断[J].干旱地区农业研究,2014,32(1):129-134.
LUO Xin-ning. (2014). Effect of nitrogen application rate on SPAD value of cotton leaf position and nitrogen nutrition diagnosis of cotton [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 32(1):129-134. (in Chinese)
[15] 李志宏,张云贵,刘宏斌,等.叶绿素仪在夏玉米氮营养诊断中的应用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):764-768.
LI Zhi-hong, ZHANG Yun-gui, LIU Hong-bin, et al. (2005). Application of chlorophyll meter in nitrogen nutrition diagnosis of summer maize[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 11(6):764-768. (in Chinese)
[16] 李伶俐,房卫平,谢德意,等.施氮量对杂交棉光合生理特性及产量、品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(5):1 183-1 189.
LI Ling-li, FANG Wei-ping, XIE De-yi, et al. (2010). Effects of nitrogen application rate on photosynthetic physiological characteristics, yield and quality of hybrid cotton [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 16(5): 1,183-1,189. (in Chinese)
[17] 曹胜男.不同年代小麦品种生长发育及产量对不同施氮水平的响应特征[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2016.
CAO Sheng-nan. (2016). The Responses of Growth and Yield of Wheat Varieties to Different Nitrogen Levels in Different Years [D]. Master Dissertation. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing. (in Chinese)

基于品种和氮肥的棉花叶色值、叶片氮含量及产量估测

Estimation of Leaf Color Value, Leaf Nitrogen Content and Yield of Cotton Based on Variety and Nitrogen Fertilizer

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[5]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[6]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[7]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[8]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[9]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[10]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[11]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[12]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[13]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[14]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[15]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.