宽叶荨麻不同部位提取液对小麦幼苗生长和光合特性的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.028

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (2): 505-513.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.028

• 微生物·生理生化·畜牧兽医 • 上一篇下一篇

宽叶荨麻不同部位提取液对小麦幼苗生长和光合特性的影响

郑天翔¹^,²(), 张明明¹, 雷玉明¹^,², 王南楠¹, 王丽娟¹^,²^,³()

1.河西学院农业与生态工程学院,甘肃张掖 734000
2.甘肃省河西走廊特色资源利用重点实验室,甘肃张掖 734000
3.甘肃省微藻工程技术创新中心,甘肃张掖 734000

收稿日期:2023-06-07 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-03-19
通信作者: 王丽娟(1989-),女,甘肃天水人,副教授,硕士,研究方向为微藻和植物生理生化,(E-mail)839525004@qq.com
作者简介:郑天翔(1983-),男,甘肃张掖人,讲师,硕士,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail)25141496@qq.com
基金资助:
甘肃省重点研发计划项目“河西走廊中药材病虫害绿色防控关键技术研究”(18YF1NG086);国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“荨麻抑菌杀虫活性研究及活性成分初探”(202110740001)

Effects of Urtica laetevirens extracts on the growth and photosynthetic properties of wheat seedling

ZHENG Tianxiang¹^,²(), ZHANG Mingming¹, LEI Yuming¹^,², WANG Nannan¹, WANG Lijuan¹^,²^,³()

1. College of Agriculture and Ecological Engineering, Hexi University, Zhangye Gansu 734000,China
2. Key Laboratory of Hexi Corridor Resources Utilization of Gansu, Zhangye Gansu 734000,China
3. Gansu Tech Innovation Center of Microalgae, Hexi University, Zhangye Gansu 734000,China

Received:2023-06-07 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-19
Correspondence author: WANG Lijuan(1989-), female, from Tianshui, Gansu, associate professor, research direction is the physiology and biochemistry of microalgae,(E-mail)839525004@qq.com
Supported by:
The key R & D projects of Gansu Province 'The Research on Key Technologies for Green Prevention and Control of Diseases and Pests in Chinese Medicinal Materials in the Hexi Corridor'(18YF1NG086);The national innovative entrepreneurship training program for college students 'Study on the Antibacterial and Insecticidal Activities of Urtica and Its Active Ingredients analysis'(202110740001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究宽叶荨麻不同部位提取液对小麦幼苗生长和光合特性的影响。【方法】以黑麦二号小麦为对象,研究宽叶荨麻根、茎、叶不同浓度的水提液(20、40、60、80、100 g/L)对小麦种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响。【结果】根部浸提液对小麦的苗长和苗干重具有促进作用,对小麦根长、根干重和根冠比为低促高抑;茎部和叶部浸提液对小麦苗长、苗干重、根长、根干重和根冠比均具有抑制作用。不同部位浸提液对小麦叶片光合特性表现为根部浸提液对小麦叶片Fv/Fm、Y(Ⅱ)、Y(Ⅰ)和ETRⅠ小幅上升后稳定,ETRⅡ和qP呈现波动变化,各处理组和对照无显著性差异,而NPQ和CEF呈先下降后上升的趋势;茎部浸提液对小麦叶片Fv/Fm、Y(Ⅱ)、Y(Ⅰ)、ETRⅠ、ETRⅡ、qP均呈现显著下降趋势,NPQ和CEF呈现显著上升趋势,浓度为80 g/L时,NPQ和CEF分别为对照组的1.37倍和5.42倍;叶部浸提液对小麦叶片光合特性指标在处理组和对照组间基本无显著性差异。【结论】根部浸提液在低浓度时可小幅提升小麦叶片PSⅠ电子传递速率,有效增加PSⅠ光能转化效率从而促进其生长;茎部浸提液使小麦叶片PSⅠ和PSⅡ同时受损从而抑制其生长,且这种损伤可通过强烈激发环式电子传递速率从而形成热耗散来对其进行保护;叶部浸提液对小麦幼苗生长呈现抑制效应,但在小麦叶片光合特性上表现不显著。

关键词: 小麦; 宽叶荨麻提取液; 光合特性

Abstract:

【Objective】 To clarify the effect of Urtica laetevirens extracts on the growth and photosynthetic properties of wheat seedling.【Methods】 The wheat cultivar Heimai 2 were used to analyze growth and photosynthetic characteristics in response to different treatments with Urtica laetevirens water extracts of roots, stems and leaves at concentrations of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 g/L.【Results】 The root aqueous extract promoted seedling length and dry weight of wheat seedling, the lower concentration of root extracts promoted root length, root dry weight and root-shoot ratio while high concentration of root extracts inhibitory effect.The stem and leaf extracts all inhibited the wheat seedling length, seedling dry weight, root length, root dry weight and root-crown ratio.With the increase of root extracts concentration, the Fv/Fm, Y(Ⅱ), Y(Ⅰ) and ETRⅠ value slightly then reach stability.The ETRⅡ and qP fluctuating changes NPQ and CEF decreased firstly then.Along with stem extracts concentration increase, the Fv/Fm, Y(Ⅱ), Y(Ⅰ), ETRⅠ, ETRⅡ and qP value were decreased significantly, while the NPQ and CEF were increased significantly.At concentrations of 80 g/L, the NPQ and CEF were 1.37 and 5.42 times that of the control, respectively.The leave extracts no significant between the treatment group and the control group the photosynthetic characteristics.【Conclusion】 The comprehensive analysis showed that root extracts promote wheat seedling growth by improving the electron transmission rate and light energy conversion efficiency of PSⅠ slightly.However, the stem extracts cause a certain degree of damage to the photosynthetic system of wheat leaves, and inhibit the growth of wheat seedling.This damage be relieved by strongly stimulating cyclic electron transport and forming non photochemical quenching.The leaf extracts show inhibitory effect on wheat seedling growth, while it has no significantly difference on photosynthetic properties of wheat leaves.

Key words: wheat; Urtica laetevirens extracts; photosynthetic properties

中图分类号:

S512

郑天翔, 张明明, 雷玉明, 王南楠, 王丽娟. 宽叶荨麻不同部位提取液对小麦幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 505-513.

ZHENG Tianxiang, ZHANG Mingming, LEI Yuming, WANG Nannan, WANG Lijuan. Effects of Urtica laetevirens extracts on the growth and photosynthetic properties of wheat seedling[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 505-513.

图/表 4

参考文献 22

[1]	陈成标, 赵晓红, 祁得胜, 等. 荨麻属植物的研究与开发进展[J]. 青海草业, 2020, 29(2):23-27.
	CHEN Chengbiao, ZHAO Xiaohong, QI Desheng, et al. Research and development progress of Urtica L[J]. Qinghai Prataculture, 2020, 29(2):23-27.
[2]	闫智臣. 甘肃省河西走廊地区间做绿肥对玉米、小麦和马铃薯病害影响的研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2020.
	YAN Zhichen. Effects of inter cropping green manure on diseases of maize wheat and potato in Hexi Corridor of Gansu province[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2020.
[3]	钱华, 高智慧, 王国英, 等. 大荨麻根、茎叶乙醇提取物化学成分的GC/MS研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2006, 26(3):31-33.
	QIAN Hua, GAO Zhihui, WANG Guoying, et al. Study on Chemical Components of Ethanol Extracts from Root, Stem and Leaf of Urtica dioica by GC/MS[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2006, 26(3):31-33.
[4]	李博. 宽叶荨麻抗前列腺增生活性及化学成分的研究[D]. 大连: 大连大学, 2015.
	LI Bo. Study of the chemical constituents in Urtica laetevirens Maxim and anti-benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)action[D]. Dalian: Dalian University, 2015.
[5]	周渊, 冀保全, 王炜, 等. 宽叶荨麻化学成分的研究[J]. 中草药, 2009, 40(5):711-722.
	ZHOU Yuan, JI Baoquan, WANG Wei, et al. The chemical composition of broad-leaf nettles[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2009, 40(5):711-722.
[6]	王翔鹏, 武璐璐, 李丽丽, 等. 胡萝卜苷药理作用研究现状[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2019, 35(7):722-724.
	WNG Xiangpeng, WU Luoluo, LI Lili, et al. Research status on pharmacological effects of daucosterol[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2019, 35(7):722-724.
[7]	贾慧萍, 胡樱, 魏晶晶, 等. 宽叶荨麻化学成分和药理作用及其开发利用研究进展[J]. 青海草业, 2021, 30(2):57-63.
	JIA Huiping, HU Ying, WEI Jingjing, et al. Research progress of chemical components, pharmacological effects and resource utilization of Urtica laetevirens Maxim[J]. Qinghai Prataculture, 2021, 30(2):57-63.
[8]	刘瑜, 张翔宇, 汤界世, 等. 麻叶荨麻的化感作用研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(3):95-99, 117.
	LIU Yu, ZHANG Xiangyu, TANG Jieshi, et al. The Allelopathic Potential of Urtica cannabina L.[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(3):95-99, 117.
[9]	张如义, 胡红玲, 胡庭兴, 等. 核桃凋落叶分解对3种作物生长、光合及抗性生理特性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(4):595-602.
	ZHANG Ruyi, HU Hongling, HU Tingxing, et al. Effects of Decomposing Walnut(Juglans regia)Leaf Litter on Growth, Photosynthesis and Resistance Physiology of Three Recipient Plants[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(4):595-602.
[10]	宋奇娉, 封鹏雯, 刘洋, 等. PSⅡ组装与修复循环机制研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(2):133-140.
	SONG Qiping, FENG Pengwen, LIU Yang, et al. The research progress of the mechanism on PSⅡ assemble and repair circulation[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2019, 55(2):133-140.
[11]	周晓星. 柳属植物对重金属镉胁迫的生长与生理响应[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2012.
	ZHOU Xiaoxing. Growth and physiological response of Salix to cadmium stress[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2012.
[12]	张强皓, 张金燕, 寸竹, 等. 光强和高温对三七光系统活性的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(5):1064-1072.
	ZHANG Qianghao, ZHANG Jinyan, CUN Zhu, et al. Effcet of light and temperature on photosystem activities of Panax notoginseng[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2020, 56(5):1064-1072.
[13]	张瑞, 詹卉, 刘姚姚, 等. 毛竹林不同浸提液对延胡索生长指标和光合特征的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2020, 40(3):59-67.
	ZHANG Rui, ZHAN Hui, LIU Yaoyao, et al. Effects of Different Extracts from Phyllostachys edulis on the Growth Index and Photosynthesis Characteristics of Corydalis yanhusuo[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(3):59-67.
[14]	刘涛, 刘文耀, 柳帅, 等. Pb²⁺、Zn²⁺胁迫对附生西南树平藓叶绿素含量和光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(7):1885-1893.
	LIU Tao, LIU Wenyao, LIUShuai, et al. Influence of Pb²⁺、Zn²⁺stress on the chlorophyll content andfluorescence characteristics of epiphytic moss Homaliodendron montagneanum(C.Muell.)Fleisch[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(7):1885-1893.
[15]	高桂青, 简敏菲, 卢龙, 等. Cu²⁺、Cd²⁺胁迫对马来眼子菜光合色素及光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(3):517-523.
	GAO Guiqing, JIAN Minfei, LU Long, et al. Effects of Cu²⁺ or Cd²⁺ stress on photosynthetic pigment and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of Potamogeton malaianus[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(3):517-523.
[16]	顾群英, 陈年来, 张凯, 等. 不同抗旱性春小麦叶绿素荧光的特性对施氮量和灌溉水平的响应[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(4):498-504.
	GU Qunying, CHEN Nianlai, ZHANG Kai, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rates and irrigation levels on leaf chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of spring wheat cultivars with a different drought resistance[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 52(4):498-504.
[17]	Caspy I, Nelson N. Structure of the plant photosystem I[J]. Biochemical Society Transactions, 2018, 46(2):285-294. DOI PMID
[18]	Sonoike K. Photoinhibitiong of photosystem Ⅰ.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011,(95):9705-9709.
[19]	Brestic M, Zivcak M, Kunderlikova K, et al. High temperature specifically affects the photoprotective responses of chlorophyll b-deficient wheat mustant lines[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2016, (1/2/3):251-266.
[20]	Zivcak M, Kalaji H M, Shao H B, et al. Photosynthetic proton and electron transport in wheat leaves under prolonged moderate drought stress[J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B:Biology, 2014, (137):107-115.
[21]	Asada K. The water-water cycle in chloroplasts:scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1999, 50:601-639. PMID
[22]	Kono M, Noguchi K, Terashikma I. Roles of the cyclic electron flow around PSⅠ(CEF-PSⅠ)and O^2- dependent alternative pathways in regulation of the photosynthetic electron flow in short-term fluctuating light in arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2014, 55(5):990-1004. DOI URL

浓度(g/L) Concentration		Fv/Fm	Y(II)	Y(I)	qP	NPQ	ETRⅠ	ETRⅡ	CEF
根 Root	0	0.81±0.02^c	0.34±0.04^bc	0.35±0.03^e	0.57±0.05^ab	1.23±0.44^ab	35.24±1.31^bc	34.42±1.78^ab	0.82±1.18^b
	20	0.83±0.01^bc	0.40±0.06^ab	0.57±0.08^a	0.63±0.07^a	0.49±0.15^c	38.46±2.37^a	37.47±2.63^a	0.99±1.43^a
	40	0.82±0.01^ab	0.44±0.09^a	0.52±0.14^b	0.52±0.13^b	0.72±0.33^bc	38.07±7.33^ab	37.85±4.17^a	0.22±2.28^a
	60	0.82±0.02^ab	0.43±0.09^a	0.44±0.16^d	0.63±0.11^ab	0.93±0.39^bc	37.31±5.09^d	37.11±4.16^ab	0.20±2.83^c
	80	0.82±0.01^ab	0.43±0.10^a	0.49±0.11^c	0.58±0.14^b	1.39±0.34^a	37.57±4.53^d	36.52±4.55^ab	1.05±1.08^d
	100	0.82±0.01^a	0.43±0.07^a	0.46±0.14^e	0.51±0.11^ab	1.61±0.19^a	37.57±6.43^d	36.53±2.93^b	1.04±1.76^d
茎 Stem	0	0.81±0.01^a	0.40±0.04^a	0.48±0.06^a	0.64±0.04^a	1.67±0.37^ab	35.30±5.07^a	34.42±3.63^a	1.12±7.63^f
	20	0.78±0.02^ab	0.26±0.04^b	0.31±0.06^b	0.46±0.06^b	1.76±0.34^b	32.00±6.68^b	27.47±4.13^b	5.53±6.72^a
	40	0.79±0.01^b	0.19±0.05^bc	0.29±0.07^b	0.35±0.08^bc	2.19±0.23^bc	29.62±7.78^c	20.85±5.44^c	8.77±3.81^d
	60	0.77±0.01^a	0.17±0.04^d	0.28±0.03^b	0.30±0.07^d	2.3±0.18^c	28.88±3.20^c	17.91±3.91^d	11.97±3.15^c
	80	0.78±0.01^a	0.13±0.02^d	0.25±0.04^b	0.25±0.04^d	2.30±0.17^c	26.65±4.31^c	14.02±2.58^d	12.63±3.21^b
	100	0.78±0.01^ab	0.15±0.02^cd	0.22±0.03^b	0.30±0.03^cd	2.17±0.25^c	23.57±3.34^c	16.38±2.16^d	7.19±1.76^c
叶 Leaf	0	0.81±0.02^b	0.37±0.05^a	0.50±0.05^a	0.64±0.06^a	1.46±0.27^ab	32.12±2.97^b	29.41±3.01^b	3.72±1.53^a
	20	0.82±0.00^a	0.39±0.05^ab	0.48±0.11^a	0.67±0.05^a	1.27±0.37^b	32.09±6.66^ab	30.93±4.67^ab	2.16±2.08^a
	40	0.82±0.01^a	0.38±0.06^ab	0.47±0.05^a	0.48±0.10^ab	2.18±0.26^a	31.98±5.15^b	29.71±5.08^a	2.27±1.38^ab
	60	0.77±0.02^b	0.32±0.04^c	0.31±0.05^c	0.42±0.06^b	2.04±0.27^a	25.46±3.16^c	23.36±2.24^c	2.11±1.64^c
	80	0.78±0.02^b	0.35±0.10^a	0.47±0.09^a	0.59±0.12^a	1.54±0.44^ab	29.21±6.36^b	24.77±5.99^a	4.44±1.79^ab
	100	0.78±0.01^b	0.36±0.03^a	0.48±0.06^a	0.62±0.03^a	1.56±0.18^ab	29.77±2.73^b	25.98±1.62^a	3.79±1.53^a

浓度(g/L) Concentration		Fv/Fm	Y(II)	Y(I)	qP	NPQ	ETRⅠ	ETRⅡ	CEF
根 Root	0	0.81±0.02^c	0.34±0.04^bc	0.35±0.03^e	0.57±0.05^ab	1.23±0.44^ab	35.24±1.31^bc	34.42±1.78^ab	0.82±1.18^b
	20	0.83±0.01^bc	0.40±0.06^ab	0.57±0.08^a	0.63±0.07^a	0.49±0.15^c	38.46±2.37^a	37.47±2.63^a	0.99±1.43^a
	40	0.82±0.01^ab	0.44±0.09^a	0.52±0.14^b	0.52±0.13^b	0.72±0.33^bc	38.07±7.33^ab	37.85±4.17^a	0.22±2.28^a
	60	0.82±0.02^ab	0.43±0.09^a	0.44±0.16^d	0.63±0.11^ab	0.93±0.39^bc	37.31±5.09^d	37.11±4.16^ab	0.20±2.83^c
	80	0.82±0.01^ab	0.43±0.10^a	0.49±0.11^c	0.58±0.14^b	1.39±0.34^a	37.57±4.53^d	36.52±4.55^ab	1.05±1.08^d
	100	0.82±0.01^a	0.43±0.07^a	0.46±0.14^e	0.51±0.11^ab	1.61±0.19^a	37.57±6.43^d	36.53±2.93^b	1.04±1.76^d
茎 Stem	0	0.81±0.01^a	0.40±0.04^a	0.48±0.06^a	0.64±0.04^a	1.67±0.37^ab	35.30±5.07^a	34.42±3.63^a	1.12±7.63^f
	20	0.78±0.02^ab	0.26±0.04^b	0.31±0.06^b	0.46±0.06^b	1.76±0.34^b	32.00±6.68^b	27.47±4.13^b	5.53±6.72^a
	40	0.79±0.01^b	0.19±0.05^bc	0.29±0.07^b	0.35±0.08^bc	2.19±0.23^bc	29.62±7.78^c	20.85±5.44^c	8.77±3.81^d
	60	0.77±0.01^a	0.17±0.04^d	0.28±0.03^b	0.30±0.07^d	2.3±0.18^c	28.88±3.20^c	17.91±3.91^d	11.97±3.15^c
	80	0.78±0.01^a	0.13±0.02^d	0.25±0.04^b	0.25±0.04^d	2.30±0.17^c	26.65±4.31^c	14.02±2.58^d	12.63±3.21^b
	100	0.78±0.01^ab	0.15±0.02^cd	0.22±0.03^b	0.30±0.03^cd	2.17±0.25^c	23.57±3.34^c	16.38±2.16^d	7.19±1.76^c
叶 Leaf	0	0.81±0.02^b	0.37±0.05^a	0.50±0.05^a	0.64±0.06^a	1.46±0.27^ab	32.12±2.97^b	29.41±3.01^b	3.72±1.53^a
	20	0.82±0.00^a	0.39±0.05^ab	0.48±0.11^a	0.67±0.05^a	1.27±0.37^b	32.09±6.66^ab	30.93±4.67^ab	2.16±2.08^a
	40	0.82±0.01^a	0.38±0.06^ab	0.47±0.05^a	0.48±0.10^ab	2.18±0.26^a	31.98±5.15^b	29.71±5.08^a	2.27±1.38^ab
	60	0.77±0.02^b	0.32±0.04^c	0.31±0.05^c	0.42±0.06^b	2.04±0.27^a	25.46±3.16^c	23.36±2.24^c	2.11±1.64^c
	80	0.78±0.02^b	0.35±0.10^a	0.47±0.09^a	0.59±0.12^a	1.54±0.44^ab	29.21±6.36^b	24.77±5.99^a	4.44±1.79^ab
	100	0.78±0.01^b	0.36±0.03^a	0.48±0.06^a	0.62±0.03^a	1.56±0.18^ab	29.77±2.73^b	25.98±1.62^a	3.79±1.53^a

宽叶荨麻不同部位提取液对小麦幼苗生长和光合特性的影响

Effects of Urtica laetevirens extracts on the growth and photosynthetic properties of wheat seedling

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴刚, 田阳青, 赵强, 李欣欣, 穆妮热·阿卜杜艾尼, 张家豪, 王文庆, 占东霞, 马春梅. 缩节胺复配不同促进剂对棉花棉铃时空分布和光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 279-287.
[2]	毛廷勇, 刘婵, 杨北方, 李亚兵, 周均, 王栋, 陈国栋, 万素梅. 滴灌棉花源库器官对化学打顶的响应特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 288-299.
[3]	高新, 汪烨霖, 朱泰武, 李剑峰, 王重, 时佳, 王春生, 张宏芝, 王立红, 樊哲儒, 张跃强. 不同施氮量对春小麦灌浆速率和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 310-317.
[4]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[5]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[6]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[7]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	秦鹏亮, 周霄, 王爽, 李佳琪, 刘颖, 张娜, 杨文香. 小麦品种衡观35抗茎基腐病EMS突变及其鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2231-2238.
[9]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[10]	冯梅, 刘超勤, 陈杰, 刘文龙, 杨志刚, 田杰英, 黄鑫. 小麦不同杂交F₁代性状变异及杂种优势分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1858-1865.
[11]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[12]	张永强, 陈传信, 聂石辉, 徐其江, 赛力汗·赛, 雷钧杰. 矮壮素滴施时期对冬小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力的调控分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878.
[13]	韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903.
[14]	朱学慧, 张雯, 马云龙, 何鹏飞, 韩守安, 王敏, 田嘉, 谢辉. 不同生态环境下葡萄光合特性差异性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1913-1921.
[15]	杨金钰, 王西和, 孙九胜. 水培对全株大麦和小麦苗氨基酸组成的影响及对比分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1589-1595.