新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (9): 2231-2238.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.018
秦鹏亮1(), 周霄2, 王爽1, 李佳琪1, 刘颖1, 张娜1, 杨文香1()
收稿日期:
2022-12-28
出版日期:
2023-09-20
发布日期:
2023-09-19
通信作者:
杨文香(1966-),女,河北保定人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为小麦病害防控,(E-mail)作者简介:
秦鹏亮(1994-),男,陕西宝鸡人,硕士研究生,研究方向为小麦叶锈菌致病机制,(E-mail)1120469245@qq.com
基金资助:
QIN Pengliang1(), ZHOU Xiao2, Kahsay Tadesse Mawcha1, WANG Shuang1, LI Jiaqi1, LIU Ying1, ZHANG Na1, YANG Wenxiang1()
Received:
2022-12-28
Online:
2023-09-20
Published:
2023-09-19
Correspondence author:
YANG Wenxiang (1966-), female,native place; Baoding, Hebei, Ph.D., professor, doctoral surpervisor research field; the prevention and control of major wheat diseases, (E-mail)Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究小麦品种衡观35抗茎基腐病EMS突变及其鉴定。【方法】利用不同浓度的甲基磺酸乙酯(EMS),对小麦品种衡观35进行诱变,以未经诱变的衡观35为感病对照,以石优17为中度抗病对照。人工接种假禾谷镰刀菌,对诱变材料进行抗性鉴定,经温室加代获得抗茎基腐病M3代材料。【结果】适于衡观35突变的EMS浓度为0.4%,并且从106株M3衡观35材料中获得7株期表现免疫的突变株,突变体材料苗期和成株期整体病情指数比感病对照分别降低34.93%和34.62%。【结论】EMS突变小麦衡观35,适宜的突变浓度为0.4%,共从供试突变品种M3代中筛选获得了7份免疫的抗小麦茎基腐病的资源。
中图分类号:
秦鹏亮, 周霄, 王爽, 李佳琪, 刘颖, 张娜, 杨文香. 小麦品种衡观35抗茎基腐病EMS突变及其鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2231-2238.
QIN Pengliang, ZHOU Xiao, Kahsay Tadesse Mawcha, WANG Shuang, LI Jiaqi, LIU Ying, ZHANG Na, YANG Wenxiang. EMS mutants of wheat hengguan 35 and identification of the mutants resistant to fusarium crown rot[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2231-2238.
品种 Variety | 0级Grade 0 | Ⅰ级Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级Grade Ⅲ | Ⅳ级Grade Ⅳ | Ⅴ级Grade Ⅴ | 总株数 Total number of plants | 病情指数 Disease index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | |||
衡观35Hengguan 35 | 26 | 4.76 | 127 | 23.26 | 111 | 20.33 | 102 | 18.68 | 94 | 17.22 | 86 | 15.75 | 546 | 53.52a |
M0衡观35 M0 Hengguan 35 | 106 | 14.50 | 148 | 20.25 | 182 | 24.90 | 137 | 18.74 | 77 | 10.53 | 81 | 11.08 | 731 | 44.76b |
石优17Shiyou 17 | 11 | 4.01 | 43 | 15.69 | 67 | 24.45 | 64 | 23.36 | 57 | 20.80 | 32 | 11.68 | 274 | 55.26a |
表1 M0小麦人工接菌后苗期的病级鉴定
Tab.1 The results of disease grade identification of M0 wheat at the seedling stage after artificial inoculation
品种 Variety | 0级Grade 0 | Ⅰ级Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级Grade Ⅲ | Ⅳ级Grade Ⅳ | Ⅴ级Grade Ⅴ | 总株数 Total number of plants | 病情指数 Disease index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | |||
衡观35Hengguan 35 | 26 | 4.76 | 127 | 23.26 | 111 | 20.33 | 102 | 18.68 | 94 | 17.22 | 86 | 15.75 | 546 | 53.52a |
M0衡观35 M0 Hengguan 35 | 106 | 14.50 | 148 | 20.25 | 182 | 24.90 | 137 | 18.74 | 77 | 10.53 | 81 | 11.08 | 731 | 44.76b |
石优17Shiyou 17 | 11 | 4.01 | 43 | 15.69 | 67 | 24.45 | 64 | 23.36 | 57 | 20.80 | 32 | 11.68 | 274 | 55.26a |
品种 Variety | 0级Grade 0 | Ⅰ级Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级Grade Ⅲ | Ⅳ级Grade Ⅳ | Ⅴ级Grade Ⅴ | 总株数 Total number of plants | 病情指数 Disease index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | |||
衡观35Hengguan 35 | 4 | 8.00 | 12 | 24.00 | 14 | 28.00 | 9 | 18.00 | 8 | 16.00 | 3 | 6.00 | 50 | 45.60a |
M3衡观35 M3 Hengguan 35 | 25 | 20.83 | 28 | 23.33 | 51 | 42.50 | 16 | 13.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 120 | 29.67b |
石优17Shiyou 17 | 3 | 6.98 | 25 | 58.14 | 7 | 16.28 | 6 | 13.95 | 2 | 4.65 | 0 | 0.00 | 43 | 30.23b |
表2 M3突变品种苗期病级鉴定
Tab.2 Identification results of M3 mutant varieties at seedling stage
品种 Variety | 0级Grade 0 | Ⅰ级Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级Grade Ⅲ | Ⅳ级Grade Ⅳ | Ⅴ级Grade Ⅴ | 总株数 Total number of plants | 病情指数 Disease index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | |||
衡观35Hengguan 35 | 4 | 8.00 | 12 | 24.00 | 14 | 28.00 | 9 | 18.00 | 8 | 16.00 | 3 | 6.00 | 50 | 45.60a |
M3衡观35 M3 Hengguan 35 | 25 | 20.83 | 28 | 23.33 | 51 | 42.50 | 16 | 13.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 120 | 29.67b |
石优17Shiyou 17 | 3 | 6.98 | 25 | 58.14 | 7 | 16.28 | 6 | 13.95 | 2 | 4.65 | 0 | 0.00 | 43 | 30.23b |
图1 M3突变品种苗期鉴定 A:衡观35;B:M3衡观35;C:石优17
Fig.1 Identification results of M3 mutant variety at seedling stage A: Hengguan 35; B: M3 Hengguan 35; C: Shiyou 17
品种 Variety | 0级Grade 0 | Ⅰ级Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级Grade Ⅲ | Ⅳ级Grade Ⅳ | Ⅴ级Grade Ⅴ | 总株数 Total number of plants | 病情指数 Disease index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | |||
衡观35Hengguan 35 | 0 | 0.00 | 12 | 24.00 | 14 | 28.00 | 10 | 20.00 | 10 | 20.00 | 4 | 8.00 | 50 | 52.00a |
M3衡观35 M3 Hengguan 35 | 7 | 5.83 | 40 | 30.00 | 55 | 45.83 | 18 | 15.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 120 | 34.00b |
石优17Shiyou 17 | 1 | 2.33 | 26 | 60.47 | 7 | 16.28 | 7 | 16.28 | 2 | 4.65 | 0 | 0.00 | 43 | 32.09b |
表3 M3突变品种成株期病级鉴定
Tab.3 Identification results of disease grade of M3 mutant varieties at adult stage
品种 Variety | 0级Grade 0 | Ⅰ级Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级Grade Ⅲ | Ⅳ级Grade Ⅳ | Ⅴ级Grade Ⅴ | 总株数 Total number of plants | 病情指数 Disease index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | 株数 Number | 占比 Proportion (%) | |||
衡观35Hengguan 35 | 0 | 0.00 | 12 | 24.00 | 14 | 28.00 | 10 | 20.00 | 10 | 20.00 | 4 | 8.00 | 50 | 52.00a |
M3衡观35 M3 Hengguan 35 | 7 | 5.83 | 40 | 30.00 | 55 | 45.83 | 18 | 15.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 120 | 34.00b |
石优17Shiyou 17 | 1 | 2.33 | 26 | 60.47 | 7 | 16.28 | 7 | 16.28 | 2 | 4.65 | 0 | 0.00 | 43 | 32.09b |
图2 M3突变品种成株期鉴定 注:A:衡观35;B:M3衡观35;C:石优17
Fig.2 Identification results of M3 mutant varieties at adult stage Note:A: Hengguan 35; B: M3 Hengguan 35; C: Shiyou 17
图3 M3 突变品种株高、分蘖突变体 注:A:少分蘖;B:半矮化;C:少分蘖、抽穗晚;D:抽穗晚,冬性增强;E:畸形穗
Fig.3 Plant height and tiller mutants of M3 mutant varieties Note:A: Less tillering; B: Semi-dwarfing; C: Less tillering, late heading; D: Late heading, enhanced winter character; E: Deformed ears
品种 Variety | 千粒重(g) 1000 grain weight (g) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0级 Grade 0 | Ⅰ级 Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级 Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级 Grade Ⅲ | |
衡观35 Hengguan 35 | 40.23b | 32.51b | 28.10b | 15.18b |
M3衡观35 M3 Hengguan 35 | 43.96a | 38.51a | 32.72a | 20.10a |
石优17 Shiyou 17 | 40.37b | 34.43b | 29.13b | 17.16b |
表4 M3突变品种不同病害级别的千粒重变化
Tab.4 Statistical results of 1 000-grain weight data of different disease grades of M3 mutant varieties
品种 Variety | 千粒重(g) 1000 grain weight (g) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0级 Grade 0 | Ⅰ级 Grade Ⅰ | Ⅱ级 Grade Ⅱ | Ⅲ级 Grade Ⅲ | |
衡观35 Hengguan 35 | 40.23b | 32.51b | 28.10b | 15.18b |
M3衡观35 M3 Hengguan 35 | 43.96a | 38.51a | 32.72a | 20.10a |
石优17 Shiyou 17 | 40.37b | 34.43b | 29.13b | 17.16b |
[1] | Fernandze M R, Jefferson P G. Fungal populations in roots and crowns of common and durum wheat in Saskatchewan[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2004,(3):325-334. |
[2] | 周海峰, 杨云, 牛亚娟, 等. 小麦茎基腐病的发生动态与防治技术[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(5):114-117. |
ZHOU Haifeng, YANG Yun, NIU Yajuan, et al. Occurrence and Control Methods of Crown Rot of Wheat[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Science, 2014, 43(5):114-117. | |
[3] |
YANG Xia, PAN Yubo, SINGH Pawan K, et al. Investigation and Genome-wide Association Study for Fusarium Crown Rot Resistance in Chinese Common Wheat[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1): 153-167.
DOI PMID |
[4] | 冯小军, 郭海鹏, 贺亚红, 等. 小麦茎基腐病田间化学防治研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(9):1515-1521. |
FENG Xiaojun, GUO Haipeng, HE Yahong, et al. Study on Field Chemical Control of Wheat Crown Rot[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(9):1515-1521. | |
[5] | 蒲乐凡, 任慧, 欧杨晨, 等. 小麦茎基腐病和赤霉病抗源筛选及关联SNP位点分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(7):780-788. |
PU Lefan, REN Hui, OU Yangchen, et al. Screening of Germplasms Resistance to Crown Rot and Fusarium Head Blight and the Associated SNPs in Wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40(7):780-788. | |
[6] | 郑中玲. 河南省小麦茎基腐病发生因素分析及其防治研究[D]. 新乡: 河南科技学院, 2020. |
ZHENG Zhongling. Study on the Occurrence Factors and Control of Wheat Stem-based Rot in Henan Province[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Institute of Science and Technology, 2020. | |
[7] | 赵越. EMS诱导小麦突变及优良突变鉴选[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2020. |
ZHAO Yue. EMS-induced Wheat Mutation and Selection of Superior Mutation[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2020. | |
[8] | LI Wenjie, GUO Huijun, WANG Yongbin, et al. Identification of novel alleles induced by EMS-mutagenesis in key genes of kernel hardness and starch biosynthesis in wheat by TILLING[J]. Genes & Genomics, 2016, 39(4):387-390. |
[9] |
Greene Elizabeth A, Codomo Christine A, Taylor Nicholas E, et al. Spectrum of chemically induced mutations from a large-scale reverse-genetic screen in Arabidopsis[J]. Genetics, 2003, 164(2):731-740.
DOI PMID |
[10] |
Henry Isabelle M, Nagalakhmi Ugrappa, Lieberman Meric C, et al. Efficient genome-wide detection and cataloging of EMS-induced mutations using exome capture and next-generation sequencing[J]. Plant Cell, 2014, 26(4):1382.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Mitter V, Zhang M C, Liu C J, et al. A high-throughput glasshouse bioassay to detect crown rot resistance in wheat germplasm[J]. Plant Pathology, 2006, 55(3): 433-441.
DOI URL |
[12] | 袁凯, 张伟, 温宏伟, 等. EMS诱导济麦22突变体库的构建及表型变异分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(4):979-988. |
YUAN Kai, ZHANG Wei, WEN Hongwei, et al. EMS-induced Mutagenesis and Phenotypic Variation Analysis in Wheat Variety Jimai 22[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(4):979-988. | |
[13] | 薛芳, 褚洪雷, 胡志伟, 等. EMS 对新春 11 小麦抗性淀粉和农艺性状的诱变效果[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(3):431-434. |
XUE Fang, CHU Honglei, HU Zhiwei, et al. Mutation effect on resistant starch content and agronomic traits of Xinchun 11 treated by EMS[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30(3):431-434. | |
[14] |
Mago R, Spielmeyer W, Lawrence G J, et al. Resistance genes for rye stem rust(SrR) and barley powdery mildew(Mla) are located in synthetic regions on short arm of chromosome[J]. Genome, 2004, 47:112-121.
PMID |
[15] |
张维宏, 安哲, 范学锋, 等. EMS 诱导小麦 TcLr19 感叶锈病突变体的筛选[J]. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(4):88-93.
DOI |
ZHANG Weihong, AN Zhe, FAN Xuefeng, et al. Screening of mutants susceptible to puccina triticina in TcLr19 Induced by EMS[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2016, 31(4):88-93. | |
[16] | 孙玉龙, 朱欣欣, 何瑞士, 等. EMS 诱导的盛农1号小麦突变体筛选与鉴定[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(7):782-790. |
SUN Yulong, ZHU Xinxin, HE Ruishi, et al. Selection and identification of the EMSInduced wheat mutants from Shengnong 1[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(7):782-790. | |
[17] | Yasuit, Sasaki, Matsukii, et al. Waxy endosperm mutants of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their starch properties[J]. Breeding Science, 1997, 47(2):161-163. |
[18] | 霍燕, 张鹏, 任丽娟, 等. 小麦茎基腐病苗期快速接种鉴定方法研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2010, 22(8):93-96. |
HUO Yan, ZHANG Peng, REN Lijuan, et al. Comparison of Inoculation Methods for Severity Assessment of Crown Rot Disease in Wheat Seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2010, 22(8):93-96. | |
[19] | 张纪元, 张平平, 姚金保, 等. 以EMS诱变创制软质小麦宁麦9号高分子量谷蛋白亚基突变体[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9):1579-1584. |
ZHANG Jiyuan, ZHANG Pingping, YAO Jinbao, et al. EMS Induced HMW-GS Mutants from Soft Wheat Ningmai 9[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(9):1579-1584.
DOI URL |
|
[20] | 邓渊钰, 孙海燕, 李伟, 等. 小麦茎基腐镰孢菌致病力的快速测定[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(11):1547-1552. |
DENG Yuanyu, SUN Haiyan, LI Wei, et al. Rapid Virulence Assessment of Fusarium pathogens Causing Crown Rot of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(11):1547-1552. | |
[21] | 王佐乾, 潘竹青, 张舒, 等. 湖北省黄连炭疽病的病原鉴定及其生物学特性[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(24):117-121. |
WANG Zuoqian, PAN Zhuqing, ZHANG Shu, et al. Identification and biological characteristics of the pathogen causing anthracnose on goldthread in Hubei Province[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 59(24):117-121. | |
[22] |
Wildermuth G B, Mcnamara R B, Quick J S. Crown depth and susceptibility to crown rot in wheat[J]. Euphytica, 2001, 122(2):397-405.
DOI URL |
[23] | Raju T N, Tumer M A, Davies P A, et al. Development of crown rot resistant gernplasm.In: Brettell RIS, Nicol J M, eds.1st International Crown Rot Workshop for Wheat Improvement[C]. Narrabri, NAS, Australia: Crown Rot of Wheat Workshop, 2012:60. |
[24] |
Li X, Liu C, Chakraborty S, et al. A simple method for the assessment of crown rot disease severity in wheat seedlings inoculated with Fusarium pseudograminearum[J]. Journal of Phytopathology, 2008, 156:751-754.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Mago Rohit, Till Bradley, Periyannan Sambasivam, et al. Generation of loss-of-function mutants for wheat rust disease resistance gene cloning[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2017, 1659:199-205.
DOI PMID |
[26] | LI Tao; Luo Meng; Qian Dan, et al. Evaluation of Phenotypic Variation of EMS-induced Mutants of Chinese Wheat Landraces Huangfangzhu and Haiyanzhong Resistant to Fusarium Head Blight[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(6):1092-1098. |
[27] | 赵天祥, 孔秀英, 周荣华, 等. EMS诱变六倍体小麦偃展4110的形态突变体鉴定与分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(3):755-764. |
ZHAO Tianxiang, KONG Xiuying, ZHOU Ronghua, et al. Morphological Identification and Analysis of EMS Mutants from Hexaploid Wheat Cultivar Yanzhan 4110[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(3):755-764. | |
[28] | 温日宇, 刘建霞, 肖东东, 等. EMS诱变对藜麦种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种:1-10[2023-08-02]. |
WEN Riyu, LIU Jianxia, XIAO Dongdong, et al. Effects of EMS Mutagenesis on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Quinoa Seedlings[J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 1-10[2023-08-02]. | |
[29] | 卢银, 刘梦洋, 王彦华, 等. EMS处理对大白菜种子萌发及主要生化指标的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2014, 2(11): 20-24. |
LU Yin, LIU Mengyang, WANG Yanhua, et al. Effects of EMS Treatment on Germination and Biochemical Characteristics of Chinese Cabbage Seed[J]. China Vegetables, 2014, 2(11): 20-24. | |
[30] |
曲高平, 孙妍妍, 庞红喜, 等. 甘蓝型油菜 EMS 突变体库构建及抗除草剂突变体筛选[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2014, 36(1): 25-31.
DOI |
QU Gaoping, SUN Yanyan, PANG Hongxi, et al. EMS mutagenesis and ALS-inhibitor herbicide-resistant mutants of Brassica napus L.[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2014, 36(1): 25-31.
DOI |
|
[31] | 金京京. 普通小麦品种抗茎基腐病全基因组关联分析及蛋白质组学研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2020. |
JIN Jingjing. Genome Wide Association Analysis and Proteomics of Resistance to Fusarium Causing Crown Rot in common wheat varieties[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[32] |
YANG Xia, ZHONG Shaobin, ZHANG Qijun, et al. Loss-of-function of the Dirigent Gene TaDIR-B1 Improves Resistance to Fusarium Crown Rot in Wheat[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2021, 19(5):866-868.
DOI URL |
[33] | 许云峰, 蒋方山, 郭营, 等. EMS诱导小麦品种烟农15突变体的鉴定和EST-SSR分析[J]. 核农学报, 2008,(4):410-414. |
XU Yunfeng, JIANG Fangshan, GUO Ying, et al. Identification and EST-SSR Analysis of Mutants From Wheat Variety “Yannong 15” Induced by EMS[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2008,(4):410-414. |
[1] | 马清倩, 杨红兰, 魏鑫, 张大伟, 程利华, 张道远. 18份国外棉花种质黄萎病抗性鉴定与筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 286-294. |
[2] | 丁新华, 宋子硕, 杨杰, 高国文, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 郭文超. 玉米种质对腐霉茎腐病和镰孢茎腐病抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 3047-3056. |
[3] | 张红, 王豪杰, 毛建才, 李俊华, 翟文强, 伊鸿平, HananEizenberg, YaakovTadmor. 基于聚乙烯袋水培法 9个甜瓜品种对埃及列当的抗性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(9): 1619-1625. |
[4] | 张学军, 郭丽霞, 张健, 杨永, 李寐华, 伊鸿平. 甜瓜霜霉病苗期抗病性鉴定方法建立及种质资源评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(5): 899-909. |
[5] | 韩宏伟,刘会芳,韩盛,庄红梅,佘建华,王强,王浩. 哈密瓜种质资源苗期细菌性果斑病抗性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1863-1869. |
[6] | 彭金凤,姚兆群,包亚洲,曹小蕾,陈美秀,陈虹娇,赵思峰. 新疆不同甜瓜品种对埃及列当的抗性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(1): 95-104. |
[7] | 张金汕;董庆国;胡艳红;王仙;聂石辉;赵风兰;加那提·阿布什太;方伏荣. 60 Co-γ射线辐射对大麦后代性状和β-葡聚糖含量的影响[J]. , 2015, 52(12): 2180-2186. |
[8] | 布哈丽且木;王奉斌;蔡栋;袁杰;张燕红;赵志强;朱小霞;文孝荣. 利用航天诱变技术选育优质高产水稻新品种研究[J]. , 2014, 51(8): 1388-1393. |
[9] | 潘颀;朱新帅;王芳;班娜;郑慧. 新疆紫草秋水仙素诱变及倍性鉴定研究[J]. , 2014, 51(2): 298-304. |
[10] | 董连新;关雪莲;努尔尼亚孜. 伽师瓜四倍体诱变方法研究[J]. , 2014, 51(2): 291-297. |
[11] | 雷传琴;杨雅婷;王亚美;赵钰;游西龙;王伟;计巧灵. EMS诱变加干旱胁迫对YOI303纤维亚麻幼苗理化特性的影响[J]. , 2014, 51(12): 2182-2188. |
[12] | 何伟;杨华;崔元玗;贝丽柯孜·阿西木;盖江峰;李鹏发. 新疆喀什地区设施番茄晚疫病调查及品种抗病性鉴定[J]. , 2014, 51(11): 2025-2029. |
[13] | 贾宋楠;王惠林;郑健;高强. 籽用西瓜种质资源对细菌性果斑病的抗性鉴定[J]. , 2013, 50(5): 864-869. |
[14] | 刘新秀;张莉;任毓忠;吉丽丽;李国英. 葡萄品种抗霜霉病不同鉴定方法的比较和相关性分析[J]. , 2012, 49(7): 1244-1249. |
[15] | 张蕾;郭龙;傅力. 紫外线诱变选育高产醋酸的醋酸菌研究[J]. , 2012, 49(6): 1120-1126. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||