辣椒小G蛋白CaROP的生物信息学分析

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.018

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 165-175.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.018

• 农产品分析检测·林业·农业信息·植物保护 • 上一篇下一篇

辣椒小G蛋白CaROP的生物信息学分析

马思洁¹(), 朱天生¹^,², 何璐¹, 杨叔青¹^,²()

1.塔里木大学农学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.南疆农业有害生物综合治理兵团重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300

收稿日期:2023-05-09 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-02-21
通信作者: 杨叔青(1986-),女,内蒙古呼和浩特人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为植物病理学,(E-mail)smartshuqing@outlook.com
作者简介:马思洁(1999-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物病理学,(E-mail)2634377513@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32160644);塔里木大学校长基金项目(TDZKBS202101);塔里木大学大学生创新训练计划项目(2022039)

Bioinformatics analysis of small G protein CaROP in pepper

MA Sijie¹(), ZHU Tiansheng¹^,², HE Lu¹, YANG Shuqing¹^,²()

1. College of Agriculture,Tarim University,Aral Xinjiang 843300,China
2. Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in Southern Xinjiang,Aral Xinjiang 843300,China

Received:2023-05-09 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-02-21
Correspondence author: YANG Shuqing(1986 -),female,doctor,associate professor,native of Hohhot,Inner Mongolia,master's supervisor,research direction is plant pathology,(E-mail)smartshuqing@outlook.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32160644);Project of Tarim University President Foundation(TDZKBS202101);Tarim University Undergraduate Innovation Training Program(2022039)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究辣椒内小G蛋白CaROP的生物学功能、蛋白理化性质、蛋白结构及系统发育关系。【方法】运用ProtParam、ProtScale、SignalP5.0、TMHMM、NetPhos3.1和NetCGlyc1.0等生物信息学软件分析9个CaROP蛋白的蛋白理化特性;运用SOPMA和SWISS-MODEL等生物信息学软件预测分析9个CaROP蛋白的结构;运用生物信息学软件MEGA11分析9个CaROP蛋白的系统发育关系。【结果】9个CaROP蛋白的亲水性总平均值均小于0,均为亲水蛋白,其中6个为稳定的亲水蛋白;9个CaROP蛋白均无信号肽,即均为非分泌性蛋白;9个CaROP蛋白无跨膜结构域,即均非膜蛋白;9个CaROP蛋白均存在磷酸化位点,均无糖基化位点。9个CaROP蛋白的主要二级结构原件为无规则卷曲和α-螺旋,其次是β-折叠,最后是β-转角。9个CaROP蛋白聚为4个分支,其中分支Ⅰ和分支Ⅲ各包括1个CaROP蛋白。分支Ⅱ包括2个CaROP蛋白,其余5个CaROP蛋白均聚于分支Ⅳ中。【结论】9个CaROP蛋白具有完整的Rho功能域,均为非分泌性亲水蛋白。9个CaROP蛋白在系统进化树中共聚为了4个分支,其三级结构建模的预测结果也均较为理想,9个CaROP蛋白结构较稳定。

关键词: 辣椒; 小G蛋白ROP; 蛋白理化特性; 蛋白结构; 系统发育关系

Abstract:

【Objective】 To clarify the biological function,physicochemical properties,protein structure and phylogenetic relationship of small G protein CaROP in pepper. 【Methods】 In this study,the physicochemical properties of nine CaROP proteins were analyzed by using bioinformatics software such as ProtParam,ProtScale,SignalP5.0,TMHMM,NetPhos3.1 and NetCGlyc1.0; The structures of 9 CaROP proteins were predicted and analyzed by using SOPMA,SWISS-MODEL and other bioinformatics software; The phylogenetic relationship of 9 CaROP proteins was analyzed by using bioinformatics software MEGA11. 【Results】 The results of protein physicochemical properties analysis showed that the total average hydrophilicity of 9 CaROP proteins was less than 0,which were all hydrophilic proteins,and 6 of them were stable hydrophilic proteins; None of the 9 CaROP proteins had signal peptide,namely,they were non secretory proteins; Nine CaROP proteins had no transmembrane domain,namely,none of them were membrane proteins; All 9 CaROP proteins had phosphorylation sites and none had glycosylation sites. The results of protein structure prediction and analysis showed that the main secondary structural elements of 9 CaROP proteins were irregular curls and α- Spiral,followed by β- Fold,finally β- Corner. Phylogenetic analysis showed that nine CaROP proteins were clustered into four branches,of which each of branch I and branch III contained one CaROP protein,branch II contained two CaROP proteins,and the other five CaROP proteins were clustered in branch IV. 【Conclusion】 Nine CaROP proteins have the Rhoa domain and are all non-secretory hydrophilicproteins.The nine CaROP proteins were clustered into four branches in thephylogenetic tree,and the prediction results of their tertiary structure modeling were also ideal.The structure of the nine CaROP proteins was relatively stable.

Key words: pepper; small G protein ROP; physical and chemical properties of protein; protein structure; phylogenetic relationship

中图分类号:

S641.3
S188

马思洁, 朱天生, 何璐, 杨叔青. 辣椒小G蛋白CaROP的生物信息学分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 165-175.

MA Sijie, ZHU Tiansheng, HE Lu, YANG Shuqing. Bioinformatics analysis of small G protein CaROP in pepper[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 165-175.

图/表 13

参考文献 25

[1]	龙言, 杨漪琳, 肖银燕, 等. 6个辣椒自交系农艺性状配合力分析[J]. 蔬菜, 2018,(10):11-16.
	LONG Yan, YANG Yilin, XIAO Yinyan, et al. Analysis of Combining Ability of Agronomic Traits in 6 Pepper Inbred Lines[J]. Vegetables, 2018,(10):11-16.
[2]	邹学校, 朱凡. 辣椒的起源、进化与栽培历史[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(6):1371-1381 DOI
	ZOU Xuexiao, ZHU Fan. Origin, evolution and cultivation history of pepper[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6):1371-1381 DOI
[3]	邹学校, 马艳青, 戴雄泽, 等. 辣椒在中国的传播与产业发展[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(9):1715-1726.
	ZOU Xuexiao, MA Yanqing, DAI Xiongze, et al. The spread and industrial development of pepper in China[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(9):1715-1726.
[4]	Assmann S M. Supplement:Signal Transduction \|\| Heterotrimeric and Unconventional GTP Binding Proteins in Plant Cell Signaling[J]. Plant Cell, 2002, 14:S355-S373.
[5]	Li H, Wu G, Ware D, et al. Arabidopsis Rho-related GTPases:differential gene expression in pollen and polar localization in fission yeast[J]. Plant Physiology, 1998, 118(2):407-417. PMID
[6]	Berken A. ROPs in the spotlight of plant signal transduction.[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2006, 63(21):2446-2459. PMID
[7]	Kawano Y., Chen L., Shimamoto K.. The Function of Rac Small GTPase and Associated Proteins in Rice Innate Immunity[J]. Rice 3, 2010, 3(2-3):112-121. DOI URL
[8]	郭亚如, 陈欣, 黄俊骏. ROP蛋白在植物生长发育及逆境响应中的作用研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(11):1-5.
	GUO Yaru, CHEN Xin, HUANG Junjun. Research Progress on Function of ROP Protein in Plant Growth and Development and Stress Response[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(11):1-5. DOI
[9]	Kang E F, Zheng M Z, Zhang Y, et al. The Microtubule-Associated Protein MAP18 Affects ROP2 GTPase Activity during Root Hair Growth[J]. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174(1):202-222. DOI PMID
[10]	Zhang Z W, Yang F, Ren N, et al. AtROP1 negatively regulates potato resistance to Phytophthora infestans via NADPH oxidase-mediated accumulation of H₂O₂[J]. Bmc Plant Biology, 2014, 14(1):392. DOI URL
[11]	Li Z, Kang J, Sui N, et al. ROP11 GTPase is a Negative Regulator of Multiple ABA Responses in Arabidopsis[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2012, 54(3):169-179. DOI URL
[12]	Li C J, Lu H M, Li W, et al. A ROP2‐RIC1 pathway fine‐tunes microtubule reorganization for salt tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell & Environment, 2017, 40(7):1127-1142.
[13]	杨叔青. 茄科植物小G蛋白ROPs在抗疫霉菌过程中的功能研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
	YANG Shuqing. The Function Analyses of Solanaceous Small G Proteins ROPs to Phytophthora Pathogens[D].. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018.
[14]	杨俊卿, 孔凡娜, 李超, 等. 条斑紫菜水通道蛋白PyAQP1基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(8):79-86.
	YANG Junqing, KONG Fanna, Ll Chao, et al. Cloning and Expression Analysis of PyAQP1 in Pyropia yezoensis[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2016, 46(8):79-86.
[15]	张园, 徐绍忠, 毛自朝, 等. 紫色番茄SlWD40-like基因克隆与表达分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(4):586-593.
	ZHANG Yuan, XU Shaozhong, MAO Zichao, et al. Cloning and Expression Analysis ofSIWD40-likeGene in Purple Solanum lycopersicum[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(4):586-593.
[16]	黄晓慧, 王炜莹, 王倩, 等. 生殖支原体P110蛋白的生物信息学分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2021, 16(6):639-643,650.
	HUANG Xiaohui, WANG Weiying, WANG Qian, et al. Bioinformatics analysis of Mycoplasma genitalium P110 protein[J]. Journal of Pathogen Biology, 2021, 16(6):639-643,650.
[17]	胡子曜, 代培红, 刘超, 等. 陆地棉小GTP结合蛋白基因GhROP3的克隆、表达及VIGS载体的构建[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(9):106-113. DOI
	HU Ziyao, DAl Peihong, LIU Chao, et al. Molecular Cloning, Expression and VIGS Construction of a Small GTP-binding Protein Gene GhROP3 in Gossypium hirsutum[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(9):106-113. DOI
[18]	雷欣, 居利香, 赵成志, 等. 黄灯笼辣椒CcCAD1基因的克隆与植物表达载体的构建[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(16):5373-5379.
	LEI Xin, JU Lixiang, ZHAO Chengzhi, et al. Cloning and Plant Expression Vector Construction of CcCAD1 Gene in Capsicum chinense[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(16):5373-5379.
[19]	鲍佳佳, 李倩, 孙铭艳, 等. 铜绿假单胞菌YfiB蛋白的生物信息学分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2021, 16(4):406-410.
	BAO Jiajia, Ll Qian, SUN Mingyan, et al. Bioinformatic analysis of the YfiB protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Journal of Pathogen Biology, 2021, 16(4):406-410.
[20]	韦蔷, 季子钧, 宫铭, 等. 马尾松PmSnRK_2.3基因的克隆与实时荧光定量表达分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(2):399-406.
	WEI Qiang, JI Zijun, GONG Ming, et al. Cloning and Real-time Quantitative Expression Analysis of PmSnRK_2.3 Gene from Pinus massoniana[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(2):399-406.
[21]	靳辉, 杨婧, 郭爽, 等. 绵羊VDR基因CDS区克隆、生物信息学分析及组织表达研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2022,(11):65-71,138.
	JIN Hui, YANG Jing, GUO Shuang, et al. Cloning,bioinformatics and tissue expression analysis of the CDS region of VDR gene in sheep[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2022,(11):65-71,138.
[22]	易华伟, 唐晓峰. 基于氨基酸序列和模拟结构预测蛋白质稳定性的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(4):83-89.
	Yl Huawei, TANG Xiaofeng. Research Progress on the Prediction of Protein Stability Based on Amino Acid Sequence and Simulated Structure[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2017, 33(4):83-89. DOI
[23]	张来斌, 马光皇, 刘语涵, 等. 枣瘿蚊图尔病毒(DjTV-2a)衣壳蛋白生物信息学分析及抗原表位预测[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(9):33-36.
	ZHANG Laibin, MA Guanghuang, LIU Yuhan, et al. Bioinformatics analysis and epitopes prediction of capsid protein of jujube gall midge tour virus(DjTV-2a)[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(9):33-36.
[24]	Yang Z B. Small GTPases:versatile signaling switches in plants. Plant Cell 14(Suppl)[J]. The Plant Cell, 2002, 14(Suppl1):375-388.
[25]	Yang S Q, Yan N N, Bouwmeester K, et al. Genome-wide identification of small G protein ROPs and their potential roles in Solanaceous family[J]. Gene, 2020, 753:144809. DOI URL

基因登录号 Gene ID	蛋白长度 Protein length (aa)	分子式 Molecular formula	分子量 Molecular weight	原子总数 Total number of atoms	带负电荷氨基酸残基总数 Total number of negatively Charged amino acid residues (Asp + Glu)	带正电荷氨基酸残基总数 Total number of positively Charged amino acid residues (Arg + Lys)	理论等电点PI
CA01g27430	210	C₁₀₃₇H₁₆₄₈N₂₈₂O₃₀₉S₆	23 202.56	3 282	19	28	9.33
CA03g28070	174	C₈₆₁H₁₃₃₃N₂₂₅O₂₅₆S₆	19 124.77	2 681	17	16	6.28
CA02g04310	197	C₉₈₆H₁₅₇₅N₂₆₃O₂₈₆S₇	21 914.36	3 117	18	26	9.32
CA00g84620	197	C₉₇₁H₁₅₄₃N₂₅₅O₂₈₃S₅	21 477.77	3 057	17	25	9.3
CA02g05500	197	C₉₆₉H₁₅₃₈N₂₅₆O₂₈₄S₅	21 478.72	3 052	18	25	9.21
CA02g21300	197	C₉₇₃H₁₅₄₆N₂₅₆O₂₈₄S₅	21 534.82	3 064	17	25	9.3
CA04g05500	210	C₁₀₅₀H₁₆₄₉N₂₇₁O₃₀₁S₅	23 045.58	3 276	18	25	9.17
CA08g19280	198	C₉₈₂H₁₅₆₆N₂₆₂O₂₈₃S₅	21 731.12	3 098	18	27	9.39
CA00g82910	224	C₁₁₃₀H₁₇₇₅N₃₀₅O₃₂₄S₁₃	25 234.15	3 547	21	28	9.04

基因登录号 Gene ID	蛋白长度 Protein length (aa)	分子式 Molecular formula	分子量 Molecular weight	原子总数 Total number of atoms	带负电荷氨基酸残基总数 Total number of negatively Charged amino acid residues (Asp + Glu)	带正电荷氨基酸残基总数 Total number of positively Charged amino acid residues (Arg + Lys)	理论等电点PI
CA01g27430	210	C₁₀₃₇H₁₆₄₈N₂₈₂O₃₀₉S₆	23 202.56	3 282	19	28	9.33
CA03g28070	174	C₈₆₁H₁₃₃₃N₂₂₅O₂₅₆S₆	19 124.77	2 681	17	16	6.28
CA02g04310	197	C₉₈₆H₁₅₇₅N₂₆₃O₂₈₆S₇	21 914.36	3 117	18	26	9.32
CA00g84620	197	C₉₇₁H₁₅₄₃N₂₅₅O₂₈₃S₅	21 477.77	3 057	17	25	9.3
CA02g05500	197	C₉₆₉H₁₅₃₈N₂₅₆O₂₈₄S₅	21 478.72	3 052	18	25	9.21
CA02g21300	197	C₉₇₃H₁₅₄₆N₂₅₆O₂₈₄S₅	21 534.82	3 064	17	25	9.3
CA04g05500	210	C₁₀₅₀H₁₆₄₉N₂₇₁O₃₀₁S₅	23 045.58	3 276	18	25	9.17
CA08g19280	198	C₉₈₂H₁₅₆₆N₂₆₂O₂₈₃S₅	21 731.12	3 098	18	27	9.39
CA00g82910	224	C₁₁₃₀H₁₇₇₅N₃₀₅O₃₂₄S₁₃	25 234.15	3 547	21	28	9.04

基因登录号 Gene ID	不稳定系数 Instability coefficient	不稳定/ 稳定蛋白 Instability/ stable protein	脂肪系数 Fat coefficient	亲水性总平均值 Total average hydrophilicity	非亲水/ 亲水蛋白 Non hydrophilic/ hydrophilic protein
CA01g27430	47.19	不稳定蛋白	82.14	-0.277	亲水蛋白
CA03g28070	43.18	不稳定蛋白	85.69	-0.04	亲水蛋白
CA02g04310	38.96	稳定蛋白	90.56	-0.138	亲水蛋白
CA00g84620	33.45	稳定蛋白	88.53	-0.096	亲水蛋白
CA02g05500	36.01	稳定蛋白	87.56	-0.121	亲水蛋白
CA02g21300	37.31	稳定蛋白	88.53	-0.122	亲水蛋白
CA04g05500	29.96	稳定蛋白	91.43	-0.029	亲水蛋白
CA08g19280	42.05	不稳定蛋白	90.61	-0.12	亲水蛋白
CA00g82910	33.89	稳定蛋白	33.89	-0.054	亲水蛋白

基因登录号 Gene ID	不稳定系数 Instability coefficient	不稳定/ 稳定蛋白 Instability/ stable protein	脂肪系数 Fat coefficient	亲水性总平均值 Total average hydrophilicity	非亲水/ 亲水蛋白 Non hydrophilic/ hydrophilic protein
CA01g27430	47.19	不稳定蛋白	82.14	-0.277	亲水蛋白
CA03g28070	43.18	不稳定蛋白	85.69	-0.04	亲水蛋白
CA02g04310	38.96	稳定蛋白	90.56	-0.138	亲水蛋白
CA00g84620	33.45	稳定蛋白	88.53	-0.096	亲水蛋白
CA02g05500	36.01	稳定蛋白	87.56	-0.121	亲水蛋白
CA02g21300	37.31	稳定蛋白	88.53	-0.122	亲水蛋白
CA04g05500	29.96	稳定蛋白	91.43	-0.029	亲水蛋白
CA08g19280	42.05	不稳定蛋白	90.61	-0.12	亲水蛋白
CA00g82910	33.89	稳定蛋白	33.89	-0.054	亲水蛋白

基因代码 Gene ID	丝氨酸 Serine	苏氨酸 Threonine	络氨酸 Tyrosine
CA01g27430	11	5	2
CA03g28070	5	4	4
CA02g04310	8	6	6
CA00g84620	9	4	4
CA02g05500	11	5	4
CA02g21300	10	3	4
CA04g05500	10	4	3
CA08g19280	10	2	4
CA00g82910	9	5	5

辣椒小G蛋白CaROP的生物信息学分析

Bioinformatics analysis of small G protein CaROP in pepper

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

基因代码 Gene ID	α螺旋 Hh	α螺旋Hh 所占比值 Hh proportion	β-折叠 Ee	β-折叠 Ee 所占比值 Ee proportion	β-转角 Tt	β-转角 Tt 所占比值 Tt proportion	无规则卷曲Cc	无规则卷曲(Cc) 所占比值 Cc proportion
CA01g27430	77	0.366 7	40	0.190 5	10	0.047 6	83	0.395 2
CA03g28070	68	0.390 8	35	0.201 1	12	0.069	59	0.339 1
CA02g04310	66	0.335	41	0.208 1	12	0.060 9	78	0.395 9
CA00g84620	69	0.350 3	42	0.213 2	13	0.066	73	0.370 6
CA02g05500	72	0.365 5	40	0.203	11	0.055 8	74	0.375 6
CA02g21300	72	0.365 5	40	0.203	11	0.055 8	74	0.375 6
CA04g05500	75	0.357 1	43	0.204 8	11	0.052 4	81	0.385 7
CA08g19280	67	0.338 4	40	0.202	12	0.060 6	79	0.399
CA00g82910	82	0.366 1	56	0.25	11	0.049 1	75	0.334 8

[1]	陈艳, 黄璐瑶, 邓昌蓉, 张彦君, 侯全刚, 邵登魁. 冷害对多茸毛型线辣椒幼苗生理水平的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1492-1498.
[2]	袁雷, 唐亚萍, 张国儒, 吉雪花, 杨生保. 基于辣椒种间杂交F₂群体的遗传连锁图谱构建及主要果实性状QTL定位[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1150-1161.
[3]	刘衍晨, 刘志刚, 白新慧, 乔鹏, 徐诚, 白慧敏, 张娟. 蛭石复混基质对辣椒育苗的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1190-1199.
[4]	裴红霞, 李生梅, 武旭霞, 耿世伟, 赖黎丽, 高晶霞, 董心久. 辣椒核雄性不育系pby-1形态学及生理生化特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 624-632.
[5]	肖中林, 闫会转, 高杰, 王思逸, 张旭旭, 艾力西热·尼加提. 不同浓度NaCl和NaHCO₃胁迫对制干辣椒光合特性日变化的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 140-149.
[6]	彭宇, 闫会转, 肖中林, 贾凯, 燕存尧, 王妍欣. 不同施肥处理对盆栽辣椒土壤酶活性及土壤微生物含量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2200-2208.
[7]	袁雷, 吉雪花, 张国儒, 石林媛, 郭河瑶, 唐亚萍, 杨涛, 杨生保. 52份辣椒主要果实性状的遗传多样性及聚类分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1935-1944.
[8]	张卢慧, 赵志强, 郭庆元. 辣椒细菌性果实条斑病病原鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1726-1733.
[9]	马燕, 许铭强, 李喜弟, 孟新涛, 邹淑萍, 张婷, 张谦. 响应面法优化辣椒籽油碱异构化制备共轭亚油酸工艺及其氧化稳定性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 908-915.
[10]	谢雪果, 袁雷, 王世宁, 沈凌峰, 夏亚辉, 吉雪花. 不同施氮水平对色素辣椒光合效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2502-2513.
[11]	张连俊, 李金兰, 张帅, 张广杰, 杨柳, 徐韬, 马德英, 刘玉升. 2种昆虫虫粪对辣椒生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1511-1518.
[12]	石磊, 王军, 陈云, 吕宁. 化肥减量配施生物菌肥对色素辣椒生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(5): 854-865.
[13]	张国儒, 唐亚萍, 杨涛, 帕提古丽·艾斯穆托拉, 王柏柯, 李宁, 王娟, 余庆辉, 杨生保. 272份辣椒资源的农艺性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2300-2311.
[14]	谢彦如, 唐丹, 张蒲, 赵志信, 董瑞芳, 崔拥民, 徐有章, 桂瑞琪, 叶丽红, 李美辰, 秦勇. 基质中化肥施用量对辣椒穴盘苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(7): 1287-1294.
[15]	张妮, 阿迪力·阿卜来提, 贾凯, 阿拉帕提·塔依尔江, 刘玉, 高杰. 氨基酸液体肥料替代氮肥对辣椒生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5): 918-924.