新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 79-91.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.009
白世践1(), 户金鸽1, 李帅2, 薛锋3, 张雯4, 潘绪兵3, 魏登攀3, 赵荣华1, 蔡军社1
收稿日期:
2023-06-05
出版日期:
2024-01-20
发布日期:
2024-02-21
作者简介:
白世践(1986-),男,云南人,高级农艺师,研究方向为葡萄栽培,(E-mail)594748964@qq.com
基金资助:
BAI Shijian1(), HU Jinge1, LI Shuai2, XUE Feng3, ZHANG Wen4, PAN Xubing3, WEI Dengpan3, ZHAO Ronghua1, CAI Junshe1
Received:
2023-06-05
Online:
2024-01-20
Published:
2024-02-21
Correspondence author:
BAI Shijian(1986-),male,Yunnan province,senior agronomist,research field:grape cultivation,(E-mail) Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究2种栽培模式对新疆吐哈盆地产区酿酒葡萄马瑟兰果际微域环境和果实发育的影响,为产区酿酒葡萄栽培模式选择提供参考。【方法】以新疆吐哈盆地产区酿酒葡萄马瑟兰为试材,采用低‘厂’字形(结果高度40 cm,处理组)和高‘厂’字形(结果高度80 cm,对照组)2种模式栽培,比较分析2种栽培模式下果实生育期果际微域环境指标和果实发育指标变化及采收期果实品质、花色苷组分。【结果】与高‘厂’字形栽培相比,低‘厂’字形栽培果实生育期果际日最高温、日均温度分别降低1.66和2.21℃,月均超过35℃温差总和与月均≥35℃高温时长分别减小39.25℃和40.12 h;日最大湿度、日最小湿度和日均湿度分别提高2.89%、1.70%和2.64%,日均低湿时长减小11.56 h;叶幕透射辐射、土壤反射辐射和总辐射分别降低36.94 %、50.38%和44.91%。低‘厂’字形栽培相比高‘厂’字形栽培更有利于果实发育,转色期浆果具有更高的酒石酸、苹果酸和抗坏血酸质量浓度,采收期果穗质量和果粒质量分别增大38.74%和25.61%,萎蔫率降低14.20%,可溶性固形物减小2.67 °Brix,总酸质量浓度提高0.83 g/L,皮总黄烷醇含量和总花色苷含量分别提高23.83%和5.80%,但低‘厂’字形栽培降低了3',5'-羟基取代类花色苷比例、花色苷甲基化修饰比例和花色苷总修饰比例。【结论】新疆吐哈盆地产区酿酒葡萄马瑟兰采用低‘厂’字形栽培能够改善果际微域环境,提高果实品质。
中图分类号:
白世践, 户金鸽, 李帅, 薛锋, 张雯, 潘绪兵, 魏登攀, 赵荣华, 蔡军社. 2种栽培模式对酿酒葡萄马瑟兰果际微域环境和果实发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 79-91.
BAI Shijian, HU Jinge, LI Shuai, XUE Feng, ZHANG Wen, PAN Xubing, WEI Dengpan, ZHAO Ronghua, CAI Junshe. Effects of two cultivation modes on the cluster region micro-environment,berry development and quality of marselan grape in turpan-hami basin[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 79-91.
图1 2种栽培模式下马瑟兰葡萄果际温度变化 注:H-Mean:高‘厂’字形日均温度;L-Mean:低‘厂’字形日均温度;H-Max:高‘厂’字形日最高温度;L-Max:低‘厂’字形日最高温度;H-Min:高‘厂’字形日最低温度;L-Min:低‘厂’字形日最低温度;H-TD:高‘厂’字形日温差;L-TD:低‘厂’字形日温差;H-≥35℃ TDS:高‘厂’字形超过35℃的温差总和;L-≥35℃ TDS:低‘厂’字形超过35℃的温差总和;H-≥35℃ HTT:高‘厂’字形≥35℃高温时长;L-≥35℃ HTT:低‘厂’字形≥35℃高温时长
Fig.1 Changes of temperature on Marselan grape culster region under two cultivation modes Note:H-Mean:daily mean temperature of H-MVSP; L-mean:daily average temperature of L-MVSP;H-Max:daily maximum temperature of H-MVSP; L-Max:daily maximum temperature of L-MVSP; H-Min:daily minimum temperature of H-MVSP; L-min:daily minimum temperature of L-MVSP; H-TD:daily temperature difference of H-MVSP; L-TD:daily temperature difference of L-MVSP; H-≥35℃ TDS:the sum of temperature differences exceeding 35℃ of H-MVSP; L-≥35℃ TDS:the sum of temperature differences exceeding 35℃ of L-MVSP; H-≥35℃ HTT:time of temperature exceeding 35℃ of H-MVSP; L-≥35℃ HTT:time of temperature exceeding 35℃ of L-MVSP
月份 Month | 处理 Treatment | 日最高温均值 The maximum temperature (℃) | 日最低温均值 The minimum temperature (℃) | 日均温度 Average temperature (℃) | 日均温差 Average temperature difference (℃) | 超过35℃ 温差总和 The sum of temperature difference above 35℃(℃) | ≥35℃高温时长 Time of temperature above 35℃(h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 May | H-MVSP | 36.98 | 15.82 | 21.16 | 26.11 | 62.50 | 70.50 |
L-MVSP | 36.78 | 16.10 | 20.68 | 25.90 | 56.00 | 72.00 | |
6 June | H-MVSP | 37.40 | 16.48 | 20.92 | 26.92 | 90.00 | 132.00 |
L-MVSP | 35.75 | 16.88 | 18.87 | 26.20 | 57.00 | 85.00 | |
7 July | H-MVSP | 38.69 | 18.76 | 19.94 | 28.24 | 121.00 | 169.00 |
L-MVSP | 35.82 | 19.45 | 16.37 | 27.18 | 52.50 | 91.00 | |
8 August | H-MVSP | 38.97 | 17.52 | 21.45 | 27.23 | 129.00 | 154.50 |
L-MVSP | 37.03 | 18.31 | 18.73 | 26.87 | 80.00 | 117.50 | |
均值Mean | H-MVSP | 38.01 | 17.15 | 20.87 | 27.13 | 100.63 | 131.50 |
L-MVSP | 36.35 | 17.69 | 18.66 | 26.54 | 61.38 | 91.38 |
表1 高温月份2种栽培模式下马瑟兰葡萄果际温度变化
Tab.1 The culster region temperature of Marselan grape under two cultivation modes during high temperature months
月份 Month | 处理 Treatment | 日最高温均值 The maximum temperature (℃) | 日最低温均值 The minimum temperature (℃) | 日均温度 Average temperature (℃) | 日均温差 Average temperature difference (℃) | 超过35℃ 温差总和 The sum of temperature difference above 35℃(℃) | ≥35℃高温时长 Time of temperature above 35℃(h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 May | H-MVSP | 36.98 | 15.82 | 21.16 | 26.11 | 62.50 | 70.50 |
L-MVSP | 36.78 | 16.10 | 20.68 | 25.90 | 56.00 | 72.00 | |
6 June | H-MVSP | 37.40 | 16.48 | 20.92 | 26.92 | 90.00 | 132.00 |
L-MVSP | 35.75 | 16.88 | 18.87 | 26.20 | 57.00 | 85.00 | |
7 July | H-MVSP | 38.69 | 18.76 | 19.94 | 28.24 | 121.00 | 169.00 |
L-MVSP | 35.82 | 19.45 | 16.37 | 27.18 | 52.50 | 91.00 | |
8 August | H-MVSP | 38.97 | 17.52 | 21.45 | 27.23 | 129.00 | 154.50 |
L-MVSP | 37.03 | 18.31 | 18.73 | 26.87 | 80.00 | 117.50 | |
均值Mean | H-MVSP | 38.01 | 17.15 | 20.87 | 27.13 | 100.63 | 131.50 |
L-MVSP | 36.35 | 17.69 | 18.66 | 26.54 | 61.38 | 91.38 |
图2 2种栽培模式下马瑟兰葡萄果际湿度变化 注:H-Mean:高‘厂’字形日均湿度;L-Mean:低‘厂’字形日均湿度;H-Max:高‘厂’字形日最大湿度;L-Max:低‘厂’字形日最大湿度;H-Min:高‘厂’字形日最小温度;L-Min:低‘厂’字形日最小温度;H-LHD:高‘厂’字形低湿时长;L-LHD:低‘厂’字形低湿时长
Fig.2 Changes of humidity on Marselan grape culster region under two cultivation modes Note:H-Mean:daily average humidity of H-MVSP; L-mean:daily average humidity of L-MVSP; H-Max:daily maximum humidity of H-MVSP; L-Max:daily maximum humidity of L-MVSP; H-Min:daily minimum humidity of H-MVSP; L-min:daily minimum humidity of L-MVSP; H-TD:Low humidity duration of H-MVSP; L-TD:Low humidity duration of L-MVSP
月份 Month | 处理 Treatment | 日最大湿度均值 The maximum humidity(%) | 日最小湿度均值 The minimum humidity(%) | 日均湿度 Average humidity(%) | 日均低湿时长 Low humidity duration(h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 May | H-MVSP | 48.00 | 16.08 | 29.27 | 20.88 |
L-MVSP | 49.26 | 16.72 | 30.81 | 19.86 | |
6 June | H-MVSP | 56.75 | 19.33 | 35.10 | 18.48 |
L-MVSP | 61.80 | 21.43 | 38.69 | 16.63 | |
7 July | H-MVSP | 70.95 | 27.03 | 46.76 | 11.90 |
L-MVSP | 74.27 | 30.00 | 50.70 | 9.60 | |
8 August | H-MVSP | 63.00 | 23.57 | 42.42 | 12.65 |
L-MVSP | 64.94 | 24.66 | 43.91 | 11.55 | |
均值Mean | H-MVSP | 59.68 | 21.50 | 38.39 | 15.97 |
L-MVSP | 62.57 | 23.20 | 41.03 | 14.41 |
表2 高温月份2种栽培模式下马瑟兰葡萄果际湿度变化
Tab.2 The culster region humidity of Marselan grape under two cultivation modes during high temperature months
月份 Month | 处理 Treatment | 日最大湿度均值 The maximum humidity(%) | 日最小湿度均值 The minimum humidity(%) | 日均湿度 Average humidity(%) | 日均低湿时长 Low humidity duration(h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 May | H-MVSP | 48.00 | 16.08 | 29.27 | 20.88 |
L-MVSP | 49.26 | 16.72 | 30.81 | 19.86 | |
6 June | H-MVSP | 56.75 | 19.33 | 35.10 | 18.48 |
L-MVSP | 61.80 | 21.43 | 38.69 | 16.63 | |
7 July | H-MVSP | 70.95 | 27.03 | 46.76 | 11.90 |
L-MVSP | 74.27 | 30.00 | 50.70 | 9.60 | |
8 August | H-MVSP | 63.00 | 23.57 | 42.42 | 12.65 |
L-MVSP | 64.94 | 24.66 | 43.91 | 11.55 | |
均值Mean | H-MVSP | 59.68 | 21.50 | 38.39 | 15.97 |
L-MVSP | 62.57 | 23.20 | 41.03 | 14.41 |
图3 2种栽培模式下马瑟兰葡萄果际光合有效辐射日变化 注:H-PARtran:高‘厂’字形叶幕透射辐射;L-PARtran:低‘厂’字形叶幕透射辐射;H-PARsoil:高‘厂’字形土壤反射辐射;L-PARsoil:低‘厂’字形土壤反射辐射
Fig.3 The culster region diurnal variation of PAR on Marselan grape under two cultivation modes Note:H-PARtran:PARtran of H-MVSP; L-PARtran:PARtran of L-MVSP; H-PARsoil:PARsoil of H-MVSP; L-PARsoil:PARsoil of L-MVSP
处理 Treatment | 叶幕透射 辐射均值 Daily average PARtran (μmol/ (m2·s)) | 土壤反射 辐射均值 Daily average PARsoil (μmol/ (m2·s)) | 总辐射均值 Daily average total PAR (μmol/ (m2·s)) |
---|---|---|---|
H-MVSP | 15.35±1.96a | 22.33±3.69a | 37.68±1.84a |
L-MVSP | 9.68±0.87b | 11.08±2.05b | 20.76±2.92b |
表3 2种栽培模式下马瑟兰葡萄果际光合有效辐射变化
Tab.3 PAR of Marselan grape culster region under two cultivation modes
处理 Treatment | 叶幕透射 辐射均值 Daily average PARtran (μmol/ (m2·s)) | 土壤反射 辐射均值 Daily average PARsoil (μmol/ (m2·s)) | 总辐射均值 Daily average total PAR (μmol/ (m2·s)) |
---|---|---|---|
H-MVSP | 15.35±1.96a | 22.33±3.69a | 37.68±1.84a |
L-MVSP | 9.68±0.87b | 11.08±2.05b | 20.76±2.92b |
图 4 2种栽培模式下马瑟兰葡萄果实发育过程中果粒质量和糖、酸含量变化 注:*表示在P<0.05 水平上差异显著,下同
Fig.4 Changes of berry mass,sugar and acid in Marselan grape during fruit development under two cultivation modes Note:* indicate significant difference at P<0.05,the same as below
处理 Treatment | 果穗质量 Cluster mass(g) | 果粒质量 Berry mass(g) | 萎蔫率 Wilting rate(%) | 可溶性固形物 TSS (°Brix) | 总酸 Total acid (g/L) | 酒石酸 Tartaric acid (g/L) | 苹果酸 Malic acid (g/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H-MVSP | 82.24±3.76 b | 0.82±0.04 b | 15.44±4.82 a | 26.10±0.17 a | 7.35±0.34 b | 5.75±0.24 b | 1.03±0.08 a |
L-MVSP | 114.10±8.02 a | 1.03±0.05 a | 1.24±0.79 b | 23.43±1.37 b | 8.18±0.22 a | 6.57±0.18 a | 1.06±0.03 a |
表4 采收期马瑟兰葡萄基本理化指标及萎蔫率变化
Tab.4 Basic physical and chemical indexes and wilting rate of Marselan berries during harvest
处理 Treatment | 果穗质量 Cluster mass(g) | 果粒质量 Berry mass(g) | 萎蔫率 Wilting rate(%) | 可溶性固形物 TSS (°Brix) | 总酸 Total acid (g/L) | 酒石酸 Tartaric acid (g/L) | 苹果酸 Malic acid (g/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H-MVSP | 82.24±3.76 b | 0.82±0.04 b | 15.44±4.82 a | 26.10±0.17 a | 7.35±0.34 b | 5.75±0.24 b | 1.03±0.08 a |
L-MVSP | 114.10±8.02 a | 1.03±0.05 a | 1.24±0.79 b | 23.43±1.37 b | 8.18±0.22 a | 6.57±0.18 a | 1.06±0.03 a |
处理 Treatment | 皮总酚 Skin total phenol | 皮单宁 Skin tannins | 皮总黄烷醇 Skin total flavanos | 籽总酚 Seed total phenol | 籽单宁 Seed tannins | 籽总黄烷醇 Seed total flavanos |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H-MVSP | 10.31±0.71 a | 1.75±0.12 a | 22.49±2.08 b | 14.66±1.28 a | 5.59±0.36 a | 17.33±0.10 a |
L-MVSP | 10.41±0.65 a | 1.71±0.09 a | 27.85±2.08 a | 16.73±0.99 a | 5.48±0.60 a | 17.55±0.20 a |
表5 采收期马瑟兰葡萄酚类物质含量变化
Tab.5 Phenolic content of Marselan berries during harvest(mg/g)
处理 Treatment | 皮总酚 Skin total phenol | 皮单宁 Skin tannins | 皮总黄烷醇 Skin total flavanos | 籽总酚 Seed total phenol | 籽单宁 Seed tannins | 籽总黄烷醇 Seed total flavanos |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H-MVSP | 10.31±0.71 a | 1.75±0.12 a | 22.49±2.08 b | 14.66±1.28 a | 5.59±0.36 a | 17.33±0.10 a |
L-MVSP | 10.41±0.65 a | 1.71±0.09 a | 27.85±2.08 a | 16.73±0.99 a | 5.48±0.60 a | 17.55±0.20 a |
花色苷 Anthocyanins | H-MVSP | L-MVSP |
---|---|---|
花青素类花色苷Cyanidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 4.688±0.535b | 7.934±0.435a |
花青素香豆酰化类花色苷Cyanidin coumaryl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.187±0.012b | 0.293±0.030 a |
花青素咖啡酰化类花色苷Cyanidin caffeoyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.005±0.000 a | 0.005±0.000 a |
总花青素类花色苷Total cyanidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 4.880±0.547 b | 8.232±0.465 a |
甲基花青素类花色苷Peonidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 37.688±0.568 b | 43.815±1.434 a |
甲基花青素丙二酰化类花色苷Peonidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.047±0.006 a | 0.056±0.004 a |
总花甲基青素类花色苷Total Peonidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 37.735±0.562 b | 43.852±1.465 a |
花翠素类花色苷Delphinidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 189.400±3.186 b | 234.687±4.282 a |
花翠素乙酰化类花色苷Delphinidin acetyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 64.777±1.764 a | 65.763±2.828 a |
花翠素丙二酰化类花色苷Delphinidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.023±0.003 a | 0.029±0.004 a |
花翠素香豆酰化类花色苷Delphinidin coumaryl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 2.437±0.185 b | 3.148±0.275 a |
总花翠素类花色苷Total delphinidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 256.636±6.055 b | 303.627±7.382 a |
甲基花翠素类花色苷Petunidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 80.328±2.032 b | 104.940±3.039 a |
甲基花翠素丙二酰化类花色苷Petunidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.058±0.004 a | 0.063±0.001 a |
甲基花翠素香豆酰化类花色苷Petunidin coumaryl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.293±0.021 a | 0.303±0.035 a |
总甲基花翠素类花色苷Total petunidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 80.679±2.056 b | 105.305±3.075 a |
二甲基花翠素类花色苷Malvidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 408.742±3.664 a | 374.115±14.826 b |
二甲基花翠素丙二酰化类花色苷Malvidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 5.513±0.256 a | 4.873±0.410 a |
二甲基花翠素乙酰化类花色苷Malvidin acetyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.471±0.099 a | 0.387±0.067 a |
总二甲基花翠素类花色苷Total malvidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 414.726±5.699 a | 379.375±7.303 b |
花葵素类花色苷Pelnidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.471±0.105 b | 0.810±0.012 a |
花葵素丙二酰化类花色苷Pelnidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.001±0.000 a | 0.001±0.000 a |
总花葵素类花色苷Total pelnidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.472±0.105 b | 0.811±0.021 a |
总花色苷Total anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 795.128±15.98 b | 841.202±27.68 a |
总3'-羟基取代类花色苷Total 3'-substituent anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 256.642±6.054 b | 303.635±7.381 a |
总3',5'-羟基取代类花色苷Total 3',5'-substituent anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 752.048±14.810 b | 788.318±25.753 a |
3',5'-羟基取代类花色苷/3'-羟基取代类花色苷Ratio 3',5'/3' | 17.654±0.131 a | 15.142±0.105 b |
甲基化比例Methylation percentage(%) | 67.054±0.223 a | 62.832±0.066 b |
酰化比例Acylation percentage(%) | 9.280±0.235 a | 8.901±0.230 a |
总修饰比例Total anthocyanins modification percentage(%) | 75.531±0.035 a | 71.060±0.116 b |
表6 采收期果皮花色苷组分变化
Tab.6 The components of anthocyanins in the peel during harvest
花色苷 Anthocyanins | H-MVSP | L-MVSP |
---|---|---|
花青素类花色苷Cyanidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 4.688±0.535b | 7.934±0.435a |
花青素香豆酰化类花色苷Cyanidin coumaryl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.187±0.012b | 0.293±0.030 a |
花青素咖啡酰化类花色苷Cyanidin caffeoyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.005±0.000 a | 0.005±0.000 a |
总花青素类花色苷Total cyanidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 4.880±0.547 b | 8.232±0.465 a |
甲基花青素类花色苷Peonidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 37.688±0.568 b | 43.815±1.434 a |
甲基花青素丙二酰化类花色苷Peonidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.047±0.006 a | 0.056±0.004 a |
总花甲基青素类花色苷Total Peonidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 37.735±0.562 b | 43.852±1.465 a |
花翠素类花色苷Delphinidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 189.400±3.186 b | 234.687±4.282 a |
花翠素乙酰化类花色苷Delphinidin acetyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 64.777±1.764 a | 65.763±2.828 a |
花翠素丙二酰化类花色苷Delphinidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.023±0.003 a | 0.029±0.004 a |
花翠素香豆酰化类花色苷Delphinidin coumaryl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 2.437±0.185 b | 3.148±0.275 a |
总花翠素类花色苷Total delphinidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 256.636±6.055 b | 303.627±7.382 a |
甲基花翠素类花色苷Petunidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 80.328±2.032 b | 104.940±3.039 a |
甲基花翠素丙二酰化类花色苷Petunidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.058±0.004 a | 0.063±0.001 a |
甲基花翠素香豆酰化类花色苷Petunidin coumaryl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.293±0.021 a | 0.303±0.035 a |
总甲基花翠素类花色苷Total petunidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 80.679±2.056 b | 105.305±3.075 a |
二甲基花翠素类花色苷Malvidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 408.742±3.664 a | 374.115±14.826 b |
二甲基花翠素丙二酰化类花色苷Malvidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 5.513±0.256 a | 4.873±0.410 a |
二甲基花翠素乙酰化类花色苷Malvidin acetyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.471±0.099 a | 0.387±0.067 a |
总二甲基花翠素类花色苷Total malvidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 414.726±5.699 a | 379.375±7.303 b |
花葵素类花色苷Pelnidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.471±0.105 b | 0.810±0.012 a |
花葵素丙二酰化类花色苷Pelnidin malonyl anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.001±0.000 a | 0.001±0.000 a |
总花葵素类花色苷Total pelnidin anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 0.472±0.105 b | 0.811±0.021 a |
总花色苷Total anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 795.128±15.98 b | 841.202±27.68 a |
总3'-羟基取代类花色苷Total 3'-substituent anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 256.642±6.054 b | 303.635±7.381 a |
总3',5'-羟基取代类花色苷Total 3',5'-substituent anthocyanins(mg/kg) | 752.048±14.810 b | 788.318±25.753 a |
3',5'-羟基取代类花色苷/3'-羟基取代类花色苷Ratio 3',5'/3' | 17.654±0.131 a | 15.142±0.105 b |
甲基化比例Methylation percentage(%) | 67.054±0.223 a | 62.832±0.066 b |
酰化比例Acylation percentage(%) | 9.280±0.235 a | 8.901±0.230 a |
总修饰比例Total anthocyanins modification percentage(%) | 75.531±0.035 a | 71.060±0.116 b |
[1] |
Anesi A, Stocchero M, Dal Santo S, et al. Towards a scientific interpretation of the terroir concept:plasticity of the grape berry metabolome[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2015, 15:191-227.
DOI URL |
[2] |
Rienth M, Vigneron N, Darriet P, et al. Grape berry secondary metabolites and their modulation by abiotic factors in a climate change scenario-A review[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12:643258.
DOI URL |
[3] | 张山清, 普宗朝, 宋良娈, 等. 吐鲁番地区气候变化对参考作物蒸散量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2009, 30(4):532-537,542. |
ZHANG Shanqing, PU Zongchao, SONG Liangluan, et al. Effect of climate change on potential evapotranspiration in Turpan region[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2009, 30(4):532-537,542. | |
[4] | 刘敏, 成正龙, 张晋升, 等. 遮阳网对酿酒葡萄果实及葡萄酒品质的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(9):1764-1772. |
LIU Min, CHENG Zhenglong, ZHANG Jinsheng, et al. Influence of shading net on qualities of cabernet sauvignon and Syrah berries and wines[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2017, 37(9):1764-1772. | |
[5] |
Tian M B, Liu Y, Lu H C, et al. Cluster spatial positions varied the phenolics profiles of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapes and wines under a fan training system with multiple trunks[J]. Food Chemistry, 2022, 387(1):132930.
DOI URL |
[6] | Cheng G, Zhou S H, Liu Y, et al. Effect of bearing position on phenolics profiles in the skins of four cultivars of grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.)[J]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2015, 90(3):356-363. |
[7] | 谢沙, 胡帆, 张振文. 酿酒葡萄直立独龙蔓不同结果部位果实品质的差异[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(3):298-306. |
XIE Sha, HU Fan, ZHANG Zhenwen. Quality differences of berries at different- heights on vinegrapes under vertical independent long-stem training system[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(3):298-306. | |
[8] | 张雯, 钟海霞, 张付春, 等. 结果高度、留芽量及叶幕厚度对“厂”形“赤霞珠”果际微环境和果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(1):76-87. |
ZHANG Wen, ZHONG Haixia, ZHANG Fuchun, et al. Effect of different fruit set heights,shoot sensities and canopy thicknesses on microenvironment and berry quality of "厂" shape Cabernet Sauvignon[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(1):76-87. | |
[9] |
Jayaprakasha G K, Singh R P, Sakariah K K. Antioxidant activity of grape seed(Vitis vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro[J]. Food Chemistry, 2001, 73(3):285-290.
DOI URL |
[10] | 王华. 葡萄与葡萄酒实验技术操作规范[M]. 西安: 西安地图出版社,1999. |
WANG Hua. Experimental Specification of Grape and Wine[M]. Xi’an: Xi’an Cartographic Press,1999. | |
[11] |
Li Y G, Tanner G, Larkin P. The DMACA-HCl protocol and the threshold proanthocyanidin content for bloat safety in forage legumes[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1996, 70(1):89-101.
DOI URL |
[12] | 黄艳, 文露, 庞亚卓, 等. 喷施钙肥对‘夏黑’葡萄果实糖酸积累的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020,(2):166-172. |
HUANG Yan, WEN Lu, PANG Yazhuo, et al. Effect of spraying calcium on sugar and acid accumulation in ‘Summer Black’ grape[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2020,(2):166-172. | |
[13] |
Wolf T K, Dry P R, Iland P G, et al. Response of Shiraz grapevines to five different training systems in the Barossa Valley,Australia[J]. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2003, 9(2):82-95.
DOI URL |
[14] | 郭金丽, 张芳, 李志伟, 等. 深畦栽培对干旱胁迫下葡萄叶幕微气候和光合作用的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019, 39(5):840-847. |
GUO Jinli, ZHANG Fang, LI Zhiwei, et al. Effects of deep-furrow planting on canopy microclimate and photosynthesis in grape under drought stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2019, 39(5):840-847. | |
[15] |
Buttrose M S, Hale C R, Kliewer W M. Effect of Temperature on the Composition of “cabernet sauvignon” berries[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1971, 22(2):71-75.
DOI URL |
[16] | 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 韩守安, 等. 不同光质处理对梅鹿辄葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(7):1665-1672. |
WANG Min, Maihemuti Turupu, HAN Shouan, et al. Effects of different light quality treatments on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Merlot grape[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(7):1665-1672. | |
[17] |
Pastore C, Zenoni S, Fasoli M, et al. Selective defoliation affects plant growth,fruit transcriptional ripening program and flavonoid metabolism in grapevine[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2013, 13:30.
DOI PMID |
[18] | Guti'errez-Gamboa G, Pardo C, Moreno-Simunovic Y. Effects on berry shrinkage in Vitis vinifera. L cv. ‘Merlot’ from changes in canopy/root ratio:A Preliminary approach[J]. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2018, 40(1):47-52. |
[19] |
Carlomagno A, Novello V, Ferrandino A, et al. Pre-harvest berry shrinkage in cv ‘Shiraz’(Vitis vinifera L.):Understanding sap flow by means of tracing[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018, 233:394-406.
DOI URL |
[20] |
Torres N, Martínez-Lüscher J, Porte E, et al. Optimal ranges and thresholds of grape berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis in warm climates[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11:931.
DOI PMID |
[21] | Zheng J, Huang C H, Yang B R, et al. Regulation of phytochemicals in fruits and berries by environmental variation-Sugars and organic acids[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2019, 43(6):e12642. |
[22] |
Pereira G E, Gaudillere J P, Pieri P, et al. Microclimate influence on mineral and metabolic profiles of grape berries[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2006, 54(18):6765-6775.
PMID |
[23] |
Coombe B G, Bovio M, Schneider A. Solute accumulation by grape pericarp cells V. Relationship to berry size and the effects of defoliation[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1987, 38(11):1789-1798.
DOI URL |
[24] | Keller M. The Science of Grapevines[J]. Science of Grapevines, 2010:311-368. |
[25] |
Mato I, Suárez-Luque S, Huidobro J F. A review of the analytical methods to determine organic acids in grape juices and wines[J]. Food Research International, 2005, 38(10):1175- 1188.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Sweetman C, Sadras V O, Hancock R D, et al. Metabolic effects of elevated temperature on organic acid degradation in ripening Vitis vinifera fruit[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(20):5975-5988.
DOI PMID |
[27] |
Rienth M, Torregrosa L, Sarah G, et al. Temperature desynchronizes sugar and organic acid metabolism in ripening grapevine fruits and remodels their transcriptome[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2016, 16(1):164.
DOI PMID |
[28] |
Reshef N, Walbaum N, Agam N, et al. Sunlight modulates fruit metabolic profile and shapes the spatial pattern of compound accumulation within the grape cluster[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8:70.
DOI PMID |
[29] |
Martínez-Lüscher J, Chen C C L, Brillante L, et al. Partial solar radiation exclusion with color shade nets reduces the degradation of organic acids and flavonoids of grape berry(Vitis vinifera L.)[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(49):10693-10702.
DOI PMID |
[30] |
Torres N, Martínez-Lüscher J, Porte E, et al. Impacts of leaf removal and shoot thinning on cumulative daily light intensity and thermal time and their cascading effects of grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.) berry and wine chemistry in warm climates[J]. Food Chemistry, 2021, 343:128447.
DOI URL |
[31] |
Gutierrez-Gamboa G, Zheng W, Martinez de Toda F. Current viticultural techniques to mitigate the effects of global warming on grape and wine quality:A comprehensive review[J]. Food Research International, 2021, 139:109946.
DOI URL |
[32] |
Mori K, Sugaya S, Gemma H. Decreased anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berries grown under elevated night temperature condition[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2005, 105(3):319-330.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Movahed N, Pastore C, Cellini A, et al. The grapevine VviPrx31 peroxidase as a candidate gene involved in anthocyanin degradation in ripening berries under high temperature[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2016, 129(3):513-526.
DOI PMID |
[34] |
Spayd S E, Tarara J M, Mee D L, et al. Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. merlot berries[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2002, 53(3):171-182.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Guan L, Dai Z, Wu B H, et al. Anthocyanin biosynthesis is differentially regulated by light in the skin and flesh of white-fleshed and teinturier grape berries[J]. Planta, 2016, 243(1):23-41.
DOI PMID |
[36] |
Mori K, Goto-Yamamoto N, Kitayama M, et al. Loss of anthocyanins in red-wine grape under high temperature[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 58(8):1935-1945.
DOI PMID |
[37] |
de Rosas I, Ponce M T, Malovini E, et al. Loss of anthocyanins and modification of the anthocyanin profiles in grape berries of Malbec and Bonarda grown under high temperature conditions[J]. Plant Science, 2017, 258:137-145.
DOI PMID |
[38] |
Tarara J M, Lee J, Spayd S E, et al. Berry temperature and solar radiation alter acylation,proportion,and concentration of anthocyanin in merlot grapes[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2008, 59(3):235-247.
DOI URL |
[1] | 刘玉芳, 张志刚, 李长城, 李宏, 程平, 杨璐. 不同温度和成熟度对杏贮藏期腐烂率和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197. |
[2] | 韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903. |
[3] | 阿布来克·尼牙孜, 章世奎, 王绍鹏, 王亚铜, 樊国全. 根域限制栽培对库尔勒香梨光合、荧光特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 344-350. |
[4] | 户金鸽, 白世践. 无核白葡萄营养系果实品质及葡萄干特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2751-2763. |
[5] | 冯贝贝, 梅闯, 王磊, 耿文娟, 阿孜古丽·衣该木, 闫鹏, 王继勋. 阿克苏富士苹果烟富3号化学疏花疏果的效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2470-2478. |
[6] | 薛锋, 潘绪兵, 魏登攀, 刘秀海, 范国元, 户金鸽, 赵荣华, 蔡军社, 谢辉, 白世践. 5个无核葡萄品种在吐鲁番地区的栽培性状及制干特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 105-115. |
[7] | 丁祥, 仙鹤, 周晓明, 张付春, 胡鑫, 潘明启, 钟海霞, 曾斌, 伍新宇. 不同砧木对火焰无核葡萄生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 79-85. |
[8] | 白世践, 户金鸽, 薛锋, 张雯, 谢辉, 赵荣华, 陈光, 蔡军社. 结果高度对‘厂’形栽培葡萄果穗微域环境、果实发育及酒品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1907-1918. |
[9] | 樊丁宇, 靳娟, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 杨磊, 赵晓梅, 郝庆. 5个鲜食枣品种果实品质特性的综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1956-1964. |
[10] | 张倩, 李萧婷, 吴翠云, 张锐, 包建平, 陶书田. 不同灌溉方式对库尔勒香梨果实品质的多变量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 578-587. |
[11] | 朴涵琪, 余晓娥, 欧源, 王宝庆, 陈虹, 虎海防. 核麦间作条件下小麦光合特性及核桃果实品质的变化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 361-369. |
[12] | 蔡军社, 刘洪波, 白世践, 白云岗, 张江辉, 郑明, 丁平. 弥雾调控技术下微气候因子对葡萄品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 385-395. |
[13] | 章世奎, 李文慧, 阿布来克·尼牙孜, 王绍鹏, 唐章虎, 曼古丽·吾斯曼, 樊国全. 15个新疆地方梨品种品质性状及不同部位石细胞含量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 3004-3012. |
[14] | 岳婉婉, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 靳娟, 郝庆, 樊丁宇, 杨磊. 不同植物生长调节剂对骏枣光合特性、果实品质及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 3013-3021. |
[15] | 王睿哲, 崔慧敏, 郭铁群, 何天明, 张蓓, 程嘉宝, 曼苏尔・那斯尔. 5个梨品种枝叶生长与开花结果特性比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2652-2660. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||