模式改造对灰枣树个体和群体冠层特性及机械适应性的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.017

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 925-934.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.017

• 园艺特产·林业·设施农业 • 上一篇下一篇

模式改造对灰枣树个体和群体冠层特性及机械适应性的影响

王文军¹(), 陈奇凌¹(), 郑强卿¹, 王晶晶¹, 张桂兵², 李海霞³

1.新疆农垦科学院林园研究所/库尔勒香梨种质创新与提质增效兵团重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000
2.新疆生产建设兵团第一师十团农业发展服务中心,新疆阿拉尔 843300
3.新疆生产建设兵团第一师九团农业发展服务中心,新疆阿拉尔 843300

收稿日期:2022-09-15 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-05-06
通信作者: 陈奇凌(1970-),男,四川南充人,研究员,硕士生导师,研究方向为果树优质高效栽培生理,(E-mail)Cql619@163.com
作者简介:王文军(1992-),男,四川仪陇人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为果树优质高效栽培生理,(E-mail)835024432@qq.com
基金资助:
兵团开放课题“南疆枣园疏密改造关键技术集成与示范”;兵团重大科技项目“特色林果业(红枣、苹果、香梨和葡萄)简约栽培标准化模式研究与示范推广”(2019AA004);兵团重大科技项目“主干结果型果园发育生理特征及调节关键技术研究与应用”(2021AA005);兵团第一师项目“红枣病虫害绿色标准化防控关键技术研究与示范”(S202202NY015);南疆科研条件建设计划项目“库尔勒香梨种质创新与提质增效兵团重点实验室”(2020DA004)

Effects of model transformation on canopy characteristics and mechanical adaptability of individual and community of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao tree

WANG Wenjun¹(), CHEN Qiling¹(), ZHENG Qiangqing¹, WANG Jingjing¹, ZHANG Guibing², LI Haixia³

1. Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences/Xinjiang Production & Construction Crop Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm innovation and quality improvement and efficiency increment, Shihezi Xinjiang 832000, China
2. Agricultural Development Service Center of the 10th Regiment of 1st Division, XPCC, Alar Xinjiang 843300, China
3. Agricultural Development Service Center of the 9th Regiment of 1st Division, XPCC, Alar Xinjiang 843300, China

Received:2022-09-15 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-05-06
Correspondence author: CHEN Qiling(1970-), male, born in Nanchong, Sichuan Province, researcher, undergraduate, mainly engaged in the physiological research of high-quality and efficient cultivation of fruit trees, (E-mail)Cql619@163.com
Supported by:
Open Project of XPCC “Integration and Demonstration of the Key Technology of Jujube Garden Density Transformation in Southern Xinjiang”;Major Science and Technology Project of XPCC “Research and Demonstration and Promotion of Simple Cultivation Standardization Mode of Characteristic Forest and Fruit Industry (Red Jujube, Apple, Fragrant Pear and Grape)”(2019AA004);Major Science and Technology Project of XPCC “Research and Application of Developmental Physiological Characteristics and Key Regulation Technology of Trunk Fruit Orchard”(2021AA005);Key Technology Research and Demonstration of Green Standardized Prevention and Control of Jujube Pests and Diseases"(S202202NY015);Scientific Research Conditions Construction Plan Project in Southern Xinjiang “The Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation, Quality and Efficiency Improvement of the XPCC”(2020DA004)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究枣树不同栽培模式的冠层特征,分析不同模式之间枣树个体和群体冠层特性差异及其相关性,寻找适合枣树集约化、机械化和标准化生产的栽培模式。【方法】以3~4 a灰枣树为试材,将株行距为1.0×1.5(m),树形为疏散分层形的原栽培模式(CK),将其一部分改造为株行距1.0×4.5(m)的篱壁形、主干形和“Y”形,冠高控制在2.5 m左右的3种新型模式,即M₁、M₂、M₃。将改造完成后的新模式作为试验组,原种植模式作为对照(CK)。对各模式枣树5~7月的株高、冠幅、作业间距以及个体和群体冠层特性进行了分析研究。【结果】M₂株高最高,M₁株高最低,6、7月时M₁与M₃和CK差异不显著,各模式的株高均在2.5 m左右且生长良好;5~7月,M₁冠幅显著最小,M₁为89.1 cm,较CK小13.1%;M₂冠幅与CK无显著差异,M₂为99.0 cm;M₃冠幅显著最大,M₃为139.0 cm;新模式极大提升了枣园作业间距,M₁、M₂超过3.0 m,便于各类农业机械进园作业,M₃在2.7 m左右;模式改造显著减小了灰枣个体及群体叶面积指数(LAI),显著增大了树冠的无截取散射(DIFN)、透射率(TRANS)以及叶倾角(MTA)。其中,CK的个体和群体叶面积指数均最大、无截取散射、透射率及叶倾角最小,M₁群体的叶面积指数最小、无截取散射及透射率最大,M₂个体和群体叶面积指数在新模式中最大,其截获光辐射能最多,M₃个体无截取散射及透射率最大,个体及群体叶倾角均最大;灰枣个体的LAI、DIFN、TRANS和MTA与群体均呈显著正相关关系(P<0.000 1),M₃的个体LAI、DIFN、TRANS与群体关系紧密度最小(R²值最小),其单株个体调控对枣园群体光合效益提升相较M₁、M₂低。【结论】模式篱壁形(M₁)、主干形(M₂)是更适宜当地灰枣机械化、集约化、标准化生产的栽培模式。

关键词: 灰枣; 模式改造; 个体和群体; 冠层特性; 机械适应性

Abstract:

【Objective】To explore the canopy characteristics of different cultivation modes of jujube and analyze the differences and correlation of canopy characteristics of jujube individuals and populations between different models in the hope of seeking a suitable cultivation mode for intensive, mechanized and standardized production of jujube.【Methods】3-4-year-old Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao trees were used as research materials to set the plant row spacing 1.0×1.5 (m), and the tree shape was the original cultivation mode (CK) of evacuation and stratification. Some of them were transformed into plant row spacing of 1.0×4.5 (m) fence shape, trunk shape and "Y" shape, and three new models with crown height were controlled at about 2.5 m. M₁, M₂, M₃. In this experiment, the new model after transformation was used as the experimental group and the original planting model as the control (CK). The plant height, crown width, operation spacing, individual and population canopy characteristics of jujube trees in each model from May to July were analyzed and studied.【Results】The plant height of M₂ was the highest and that of M₁ was the lowest. There was no significant difference between M₁ and M₃ and CK in June and July. The plant height of each model was about 2.5 m and grew well; From May to July, M₁ crown width was significantly the smallest, M₁ was 89.1 cm, 13.1% smaller than CK; There was no significant difference between M₂ and CK, M₂ was 99.0 cm; The crown width of M₃ was significantly the largest, and M₃ was 139.0 cm; The new mode greatly improved the operation spacing of jujube garden, M₁ and M₂ exceeded 3.0 m, which was convenient for all kinds of agricultural machinery to enter the garden for operation, and M₃ was about 2.7 m; The model transformation significantly reduced the leaf area index (LAI) of individual and population, and significantly increased the non interception scattering (DIFN), transmittance (TRANS) and leaf inclination (MTA) of canopy. Among them, CK had the largest individual and group leaf area index, the smallest non intercepted scattering, transmittance and leaf inclination, M₁ had the smallest individual and group leaf area index, the largest non intercepted scattering and transmittance, M₂ had the largest individual and group leaf area index in the new model, the most intercepted light radiation energy, M₃ has the largest non intercepted scattering and transmittance, and the largest individual and group leaf inclination; LAI, DIFN, trans and MTA of grey jujube individuals were significantly positively correlated with the population (P<0.000,1), and the relationship between LAI, DIFN and trans of M₃ individuals and the population was the smallest (R² value was the smallest). The improvement of photosynthetic benefit of jujube garden population by individual regulation was lower than that of M₁ and M₂.【Conclusion】Models Hedgerow shape(M₁) and Trunk shape(M₂) are more suitable for mechanized, intensive and standardized production of local Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao.

Key words: Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao; model transformation; individual and community; canopy characteristics; mechanical adaptability

中图分类号:

S665.1

王文军, 陈奇凌, 郑强卿, 王晶晶, 张桂兵, 李海霞. 模式改造对灰枣树个体和群体冠层特性及机械适应性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 925-934.

WANG Wenjun, CHEN Qiling, ZHENG Qiangqing, WANG Jingjing, ZHANG Guibing, LI Haixia. Effects of model transformation on canopy characteristics and mechanical adaptability of individual and community of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao tree[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 925-934.

图/表 13

图1 树形结构示意

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of tree structure

图2 植物冠层分析仪对个体和群体的测定方法俯视图

Fig.2 Top view of determination Method of individual and community by plant canopy analyzer

图3 模式改造下灰枣株高变化注:小写字母表示在0.05水平上的差异显著性,下同

Fig.3 Effect of model transformation on plant height of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao Note: small letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level, the same as below

图4 模式改造下灰枣冠幅变化

Fig.4 Effect of pattern transformation on crown width of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图5 模式改造下灰枣作业间距变化

Fig.5 Influence of mode transformation on operation distanceof Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图6 模式改造下灰枣个体与群体叶面积指数(LAI)变化

Fig.6 Effects of model modification on leaf area index of individual and community of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图7 模式改造下灰枣个体与群体无截取散射(DIFN)变化

Fig.7 Effects of model modification on individual and community non intercepted scattering of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图8 模式改造下灰枣个体与群体透射率(TRANS)变化

Fig.8 Effects of model modification on individual and communitytransmissivity of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图9 模式改造下灰枣个体及群体叶倾角(MTA)变化

Fig.9 Effects of model modification on individual and communityleaf angle inclination of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao.

图10 模式改造下灰枣个体与群体间叶面积指数相关关系变化

Fig.10 Effects of model modification on individual and community correlation of leaf area index of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图11 模式改造下灰枣个体与群体间无截取散射相关关系变化

Fig.11 Effects of model modification on individual and community correlation of non intercepted scattering of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图12 模式改造下灰枣个体与群体间透射率相关关系变化

Fig.12 Effects of model modification on individual and community correlation of transmissivity of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

图13 模式改造下灰枣个体与群体间叶倾角相关关系变化

Fig.13 Effects of model modification on individual and community correlation of leaf angle inclination of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao

参考文献 30

[1]	高星艳. 临县红枣“六位一体”设施栽培新模式探索[J]. 中国水土保持, 2016,(6):26-28.
	GAO Xingyan. Exploration of new "six in one" facility cultivation mode of jujube in Linxian[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2016,(6): 26-28.
[2]	刘志国, 宋韬亮, 孙芝梅, 等. 太行山区鲜食枣日光温室促成栽培技术研究[J]. 中国果树, 2017,(6):51-53.
	LIU Zhiguo, SONG Taoliang, SUN Zhimei, et al. Study on forcing cultivation technology of fresh jujube in Sunlight Greenhouse in Taihang Mountain Area[J]. China Fruits, 2017,(6): 51-53.
[3]	刘艳红, 曹兵, 万仲武, 等. 灵武长枣设施栽培不同模式下营养生长果实品质的调查与分析[J]. 农业科学研究, 2019, 40(1):38-43.
	LIU Yanhong, CAO Bing, WAN Zhongwu, et al. Investigation and analysis of fruit quality of Lingwu jujube under different cultivation modes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 40(1): 38-43.
[4]	吴艳飞. 日光温室金丝王枣高产绿色栽培技术研究与推广[J]. 现代农业, 2020,(10):41.
	WU Yanfei. Research and promotion of high yield and green cultivation techniques of jinsiwang jujube in solar greenhouse[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2020,(10): 41.
[5]	张勤, 邓景丽, 宋淑燕, 等. 设施灵武长枣栽培模式及配套管理技术[J]. 果树资源学报, 2020, 1(4):32-33.
	ZHANG Qin, DENG Jingli, SONG Shuyan, et al. Cultivation mode and supporting management technology of facility Lingwu Long Jujube[J]. Journal of Fruit Resources, 2020, 1(4): 32-33.
[6]	王硕颖, 陈海冰. 设施灵武长枣坐果率的提高措施[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017,(13):100.
	WANG Shuoying, CHEN Haibing. Measures to improve fruit setting rate of Lingwu Long Jujube[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,(13): 100.
[7]	何永波, 薛新平, 贾民隆, 等. 设施栽培对宫枣光合特性的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48(4):571-575.
	HE Yongbo, XUE Xinping, JIA Minlong, et al. Effects of Protected Cultivation on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Gongzao[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(4): 571-575.
[8]	夏湛河, 张振荣, 谢志强, 等. 设施枣树整形修剪技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2015,(10):112.
	XIA Zhanhe, ZHANG Zhenrong, XIE Zhiqiang, et al. Pruning technology of facility jujube[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015,(10): 112.
[9]	安小龙. 海东地区日光温室七月鲜枣栽培技术要点[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2020,(11):86-87.
	AN Xiaolong. Key points of cultivation techniques of July jujube in Solar Greenhouse in Haidong area[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020,(11): 86-87.
[10]	陈海龙, 刘鑫. 山西临猗冬枣设施栽培技术[J]. 山西林业科技, 2019, 48(3):35-36.
	CHEN Hailong, LIU Xin. Protected cultivation techniques of winter jujube in Linyi, Shanxi[J]. Shanxi Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 48(3): 35-36.
[11]	杨振江, 王振亮, 于洪伟, 等. 马牙枣日光温室促成栽培关键技术[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2014, 30(12):192.
	YANG Zhenjiang, WANG Zhenliang, YU Hongwei, et al. Key cultivation techniques of jujube in solar greenhouse[J]. Chinese Horticulture Abstracts, 2014, 30(12): 192.
[12]	李忠, 付晓, 杨红花. 设施栽培灵武长枣病虫害的发生与综合防治[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017,(24):98.
	LI Zhong, FU Xiao, YANG Honghua. Occurrence and integrated control of diseases and insect pests of Lingwu Long Jujube in protected cultivation[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,(24): 98.
[13]	高梅秀, 姚宗国, 鲍明辉, 等. 枣设施栽培品种的需冷量研究[J]. 中国果树, 2013,(6):15-17.
	GAO Meixiu, YAO Zongguo, BAO Minghui, et al. Study on chilling requirement of protected jujube cultivars[J]. China Fruits, 2013,(6): 15-17.
[14]	王长柱, 高京草, 刘振中, 等. 早熟大果鲜食枣品种“七月鲜”[J]. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(4):499.
	WANG Changzhu, GAO Jingcao, LIU Zhenzhong, et al. Early maturing big fruit fresh jujube cultivar "July fresh"[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2003, 30(4): 499.
[15]	吴翠云, 蒋卉, 李天红, 等. 土施钾肥对骏枣叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018,(4):99-106.
	WU Cuiyun, JIANG Hui, LI Tianhong, et al. effects of Potassium Fertilizer on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Junzao[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2018,(4): 99-106.
[16]	丁洪涛, 周相梅. 骏枣超密植栽培简约修剪技术[J]. 新疆林业, 2017,(5):30-31.
	DING Hongtao, ZHOU Xiangmei. Simple pruning techniques for super dense planting of Junzao[J]. Forestry of Xinjiang, 2017, (5): 30-31.
[17]	樊丁宇, 肖雷, 周晓明, 等. 枣农间作环境效应其及对红枣坐果率的影响研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(3):450-454.
	FAN Dingyu, XIAO Lei, ZHOU Xiaoming, et al. Environmental effects of jujube intercropping and its effect on fruit setting rate of jujube[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(3): 450-454.
[18]	Watson D J. Comparative Physiological Studies on the Growth of Field Crops: I. Variation in Net Assimilation Rate and Leaf Area between Species and Varieties, and within and between Years[J]. Annals of Botany, 1947,(1):41-76.
[19]	唐建民, 廖钦洪, 刘奕清, 等. 基于CASI高光谱数据的作物叶面积指数估算[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(5):1351-1356.
	TANG Jianmin, LIAO Qinhong, LIU Yiqing, et al. Estimation of crop leaf area index based on CASI hyperspectral data[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2015, 35(5): 1351-1356.
[20]	Liu J, Pattey E. Retrieval of leaf area index from top-of-canopy digital photography over agricultural crops[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2010, 150(11): 1485-1490. DOI URL
[21]	Gitelson A A, Merzlyak M N, Chivkunova O B. Optical properties and nondestructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves[J]. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2001, 74(1).
[22]	孔许, 徐丽娜, 詹俊辉, 等. 水稻高群体光合速率品种筛选及其叶倾角特征研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2018, 52(4):526-532.
	KONG Xu, XU Lina, ZHAN Junhui, et al. Selection of rice varieties with high population photosynthetic rate and leaf inclination characteristics[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2018, 52(4): 526-532.
[23]	汪懋华. “精细农业”发展与工程技术创新[J]. 农业工程学报, 1999, 15(1):1-8.
	WANG Maohua. Development of "fine agriculture" and innovation of engineering technology[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 1999, 15(1): 7-14.
[24]	周丽, 王长柱, 李新岗. 新疆现代红枣栽培模式研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(2):139-143.
	ZHOU Li, WANG Changzhu, LI Xingang. Study on Cultivation Mode of modern jujube in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(2): 139-143.
[25]	王彦伟, 王尚堃, 杜红阳. “黄金”梨不同栽培密度对比试验[J]. 北方园艺, 2015,(24):19-21.
	WANG Yanwei, WANG Shangkun, DU Hongyang. Comparative experiment on different planting densities of "Huangjin" pear[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2015, (24): 19-21.
[26]	牛自勉, 蔚露, 降云峰, 等. 间伐对梨园地面不同区域太阳辐射的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2011, 39(12):1252-1255.
	NIN Zimian, WEI Lu, JIANG Yunfeng, et al. Effect of thinning on solar radiation in different areas of pear orchard[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(12): 1252-1255.
[27]	郑强卿, 陈奇凌, 李铭, 等. 南疆枣树种植模式改造对骏枣生长发育的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(4):1564-1568.
	ZHENG Qiangqing, CHEN Qiling, LI Ming, et al. Effects of jujube planting pattern transformation in southern Xinjiang on growth and development of Junzao[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(4): 1564-1568.
[28]	安佰义, 谷娜, 刘晓嘉, 等. 不同树形对李树冠层结构和光合特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019,(3):29-35.
	AN Baiyi, GU Na, LIU Xiaojia, et al. Effects of different tree shapes on canopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics of plum[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019,(3): 29-35.
[29]	杨焕枝, 杜瑞芬, 师景宇, 等. 巴盟绿色食品梨树优质丰产高效栽培技术规程[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2000,(S1):106-107.
	YANG Huanzhi, DU Ruifen, SHI Jingyu, et al. Technical regulation for high quality, high yield and high efficiency cultivation of green food pear in Bameng[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2000,(S1): 106-107.
[30]	李守娟, 马杰, 唐立松, 等. 梭梭群落碳交换的尺度转换研究:从叶片到群落[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(2):362-370.
	LI Shoujuan, MA Jie, TANG Lisong, et al. Scale transformation of carbon exchange in Haloxylon ammodendron community: from leaf to community[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(2): 362-370.

模式改造对灰枣树个体和群体冠层特性及机械适应性的影响

Effects of model transformation on canopy characteristics and mechanical adaptability of individual and community of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao tree

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	靳娟, 苏比娜·肖克来提, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 杨磊, 郝庆, 樊丁宇. 灰枣扩展蛋白基因ZjEXPA8的克隆及序列分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2223-2230.
[2]	李爽, 谢丹露, 吴继周, 马瑞, 谢艾迪, 邵蕾, 高娟娟, 韩海霞. 不同炮制方法下若羌灰枣主要功能成分及抗氧化活性的对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 935-942.
[3]	张虎梅, 田雨, 石峰, 李军宏, 韩焕勇, 王方永, 罗宏海. 机采模式下耐旱性不同棉花品种冠层特性对滴水量的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2888-2898.
[4]	安世杰, 支金虎, 郑强卿, 王文军, 宋伞伞, 张迪. 氮磷配施对灰枣光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2514-2523.
[5]	张洋, 马英杰. 不同生育期成龄灰枣树茎流速率与气象因子的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1712-1722.
[6]	王文军, 陈奇凌, 郑强卿, 王晶晶, 王振东. 不同树形对灰枣叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(4): 616-624.
[7]	宋亚伟, 陈虹, 张述斌, 崔炜杰, 胡安鸿, 龙建春. 不同药剂对灰枣光合特性及果实外观品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(8): 1443-1449.
[8]	杨磊, 樊丁宇, 靳娟, 徐叶挺, 周晓明, 冯贝贝, 郝庆. 环剥对灰枣果实中糖积累及蔗糖代谢相关酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7): 1244-1252.
[9]	王文军, 林敏娟, 王振磊. 灰枣主干形和小冠疏层形产量及品质对比分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(6): 1041-1051.
[10]	哈地尔·依沙克, 木合塔尔·扎热, 马合木提·阿不来提, 吴正保, 史彦江. 不同土壤条件下灰枣叶片与果实营养品质的相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(7): 1236-1244.
[11]	何伟忠, 王成, 庄宇, 陶永霞, 张红艳, 陈贺, 赵馨馨, 朱靖蓉. 新疆灰枣中15种营养组分的质量分析及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(9): 1644-1650.
[12]	康露;朱靖蓉;赵多勇;刘河疆;王成. 锶同位素溯源若羌灰枣产地的可行性研究[J]. , 2017, 54(6): 1066-1075.
[13]	冯会丽;吴正保;郭佳欢;宋锋惠;马合木提·阿不来提. 灰枣3个优系果实膨大期的光合及荧光特性研究[J]. , 2016, 53(6): 1014-1022.
[14]	徐斌;白克力·塔西铁木尔;车凤斌;潘俨;张婷;郑素慧. 不同温度环境下灰枣光合特征日变化的研究[J]. , 2015, 52(12): 2222-2229.
[15]	王成;何伟忠;陶永霞;郑伟华;乔坤云;严淑云;姚正礼;付磊康. 新郑和若羌灰枣氨基酸组成比较研究[J]. , 2015, 52(1): 51-55.