新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 2988-2996.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.014
张燕红1(), 杜孝敬2, 康民泰3, 文孝荣3, 唐福森3, 袁杰1, 赵志强1, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜1, 虢虎4, 王奉斌2()
收稿日期:
2022-01-30
出版日期:
2022-12-20
发布日期:
2023-01-30
通信作者:
王奉斌
作者简介:
张燕红(1982-),女,副研究员,研究方向为水稻遗传育种,(E-mail)xjnkywfb@163.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Yanhong1(), DU Xiaojing2, WEN Xiaorong3, KANG Mintai3, TANG Fusen3, YUAN Jie1, ZHAO Zhiqiang1, Buhaliqem Abliz1, GUO Hu4, WANG Fengbin2()
Received:
2022-01-30
Online:
2022-12-20
Published:
2023-01-30
Correspondence author:
WANG Fengbin
Supported by:
摘要: 【目的】 研究外源菌对水稻耐盐性的影响机制。【方法】 以水稻品种秋田小町为材料,于2019年4~10月采用盆栽方式,研究不同盐胁迫下(0、1、2、4 g/kg)根系接种微生物菌对水稻的生育进程、地上部生长指标、产量及产量构成因素的影响。【结果】 水稻根系在接种和未接种外源微生物菌后,其苗期成活率、孕穗期单株叶面积、最高分蘖数、单株干物质总量、每穗粒数、结实率、千粒重及单株产量均随着NaCl 浓度的增加呈下降的趋势,且轻度盐胁迫处理(1 g/kg)与正常对照处理(0 g/kg)之间无显著差异(P<0.05);在中度盐胁迫(2 g/kg)下,接种外源微生物菌比较未接种条件可显著提高水稻苗期成活率、孕穗期单株叶面积、分蘖成穗能力、单株干物质总量和单株产量;在重度盐胁迫(4 g/kg)下,水稻植株受盐害死亡,外源菌的效果未能体现。【结论】 当水稻受到中度盐胁迫(2 g/kg)时,水稻根系接种外源微生物菌可以缓解盐逆境对水稻生长的抑制作用,提升水稻成活率和产量,增加水稻耐盐性。
中图分类号:
张燕红, 杜孝敬, 康民泰, 文孝荣, 唐福森, 袁杰, 赵志强, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 虢虎, 王奉斌. 不同盐浓度下外源微生物菌对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2988-2996.
ZHANG Yanhong, DU Xiaojing, WEN Xiaorong, KANG Mintai, TANG Fusen, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Zhiqiang, Buhaliqem Abliz, GUO Hu, WANG Fengbin. Effects of Exogenous Microorganisms on Growth and Yield of Rice under Different Salt Concentrations[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2988-2996.
处理 Treatment | 播种日期 Sowing date | 移栽日期 Transpla nting date | 返青日期 Regree ning date | 分蘖初期 Early tillering stage | 分蘖盛期 Maximum tillering | 始穗日期 Initial heading stage | 齐穗日期 Full heading | 成熟日期 Mature date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 | |
T1 | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 | |
T2 | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-25 | 05-30 | 06-12 | 07-22 | 07-29 | 09-15 |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-25 | 05-30 | 06-12 | 07-22 | 07-29 | 09-15 | |
T3 | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
表1 不同处理下水稻生育进程变化
Table 1 Effects of different treatments on rice growth and development (mm/dd)
处理 Treatment | 播种日期 Sowing date | 移栽日期 Transpla nting date | 返青日期 Regree ning date | 分蘖初期 Early tillering stage | 分蘖盛期 Maximum tillering | 始穗日期 Initial heading stage | 齐穗日期 Full heading | 成熟日期 Mature date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 | |
T1 | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-19 | 05-25 | 06-10 | 07-20 | 07-25 | 09-10 | |
T2 | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-25 | 05-30 | 06-12 | 07-22 | 07-29 | 09-15 |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | 05-25 | 05-30 | 06-12 | 07-22 | 07-29 | 09-15 | |
T3 | M0 | 04-14 | 05-09 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
M1 | 04-14 | 05-09 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
处理 treatment | 最高分蘖数 Maximum tiller number(个/株) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗长 Spike length (cm) | 单株干物质总量 Total dry matter per plant (g/株) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | |
CK | 8.38a | 9.01a | 78.00a | 82.00a* | 15.11a | 15.53a | 21.34a | 22.45a* |
T1 | 8.85a | 9.51a | 79.00a | 83.67a* | 15.62a | 15.99a | 19.43b | 20.52b* |
T2 | 7.63b | 8.64b* | 76.33b | 79.15b* | 14.29b | 14.55b | 17.28c | 18.68c* |
T3 | / | 3.92c* | / | / | / | / | / | / |
表2 不同处理下水稻基本农艺性状变化
Table 2 Effects of different treatments on basic agronomic of rice
处理 treatment | 最高分蘖数 Maximum tiller number(个/株) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗长 Spike length (cm) | 单株干物质总量 Total dry matter per plant (g/株) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | |
CK | 8.38a | 9.01a | 78.00a | 82.00a* | 15.11a | 15.53a | 21.34a | 22.45a* |
T1 | 8.85a | 9.51a | 79.00a | 83.67a* | 15.62a | 15.99a | 19.43b | 20.52b* |
T2 | 7.63b | 8.64b* | 76.33b | 79.15b* | 14.29b | 14.55b | 17.28c | 18.68c* |
T3 | / | 3.92c* | / | / | / | / | / | / |
处理 treatment | 有效穗数 Number of productive ear (个/株) | 每穗粒数 Grains per ear (粒) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1000 grain weight (g) | 单株产量 Yield per plant (g/株) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | |
CK | 7.02a | 7.31a | 74.73a | 75.30a | 90.83a | 95.33a* | 22.82a | 23.40a | 9.66a | 10.82a* |
T1 | 7.30a | 7.44a | 70.27a | 72.81a | 90.66a | 94.98a* | 22.36a | 23.12a | 9.51a | 10.33a* |
T2 | 6.16b | 6.72b* | 65.15b | 67.91b | 87.42b | 93.09b* | 20.86b | 20.96b | 7.47b | 8.45b* |
T3 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
表3 不同处理下水稻产量及产量构成因素变化
Table 3 Effects of different treatments on rice yield and yield components
处理 treatment | 有效穗数 Number of productive ear (个/株) | 每穗粒数 Grains per ear (粒) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1000 grain weight (g) | 单株产量 Yield per plant (g/株) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | M0 | M1 | |
CK | 7.02a | 7.31a | 74.73a | 75.30a | 90.83a | 95.33a* | 22.82a | 23.40a | 9.66a | 10.82a* |
T1 | 7.30a | 7.44a | 70.27a | 72.81a | 90.66a | 94.98a* | 22.36a | 23.12a | 9.51a | 10.33a* |
T2 | 6.16b | 6.72b* | 65.15b | 67.91b | 87.42b | 93.09b* | 20.86b | 20.96b | 7.47b | 8.45b* |
T3 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
[1] | 万吉丽, 刘佳音, 张国栋, 等. 袁隆平与海水稻[J]. 杂交水稻, 2022, 37(S1): 96-103. |
WANG Jili, LIU Jiayin, ZHANG Guodong. et al. Yuan Longping and Salt-water Rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2022, 37(S1): 96-103. | |
[2] |
庄庆威, 吴世新, 杨怡, 等. 近10年新疆不同程度盐渍化耕地的时空变化特征[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2021, 38(3):341-349.
DOI |
ZHUANG Qingwei, WU Shixin, YANG Yi, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of different degrees of salinized cultivated land in Xinjiang in recent ten J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(3):341-349. | |
[3] | 魏征, 屠乃美, 易镇邪. 盐碱地对水稻的胁迫效应及其改良与高效利用的研究进展[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2019, 6(4): 45-52. |
WEI Zheng, TU Naimei, YI Zhenxie. Research Progress on Stress Effect of Saline-alkali Soil on Rice and Its Improvement and Efficient J]. Journal of Hunan Ecological Science, 2019, 6(4): 45-52. | |
[4] | 梁银培, 孙健, 索艺宁, 等. 水稻耐盐性和耐碱性相关性状的QTL定位及环境互作分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(10): 1747-1762. |
LIANG Yinei, SUN Jian, SUO, et al. QTL Mapping and QTL × Environment Interaction Analysis of Salt and Alkali Tolerance-Related Traits in Rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(10): 1747-1762. | |
[5] |
Ivushkin K, Bartholomeus H, Bregt A K, et al. Soil salinity assessment through satellite thermography for different irrigated and rainfed[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018, 68:230-237.
DOI URL |
[6] | 丁建丽, 姚远, 王飞. 干旱区土壤盐渍化特征空间建模[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(16):4620-4631. |
DING Jianli, YAO Yuan, WANG Fei. Detecting soil salinization in arid regions using spectral feature space derived from remote sensing data. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014(16):4620-4631. | |
[7] |
Ayetiguli Sidike, Zhao Shuhe, Wen Yuming, Estimating soil salinity in Pingluo County of China using QuickBird data and soil reflectance spectra[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2014, 26(2):156-175.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Rana, Munns, Mark, et al. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance[J]. Annual Review Plant Biology, 2008, 59:651-81.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Sudhir P, Murthy S. Effects of salt stress on basic processes of photosynthesis[J]. Photosynthetica, 2004, 42(2):481-486.
DOI URL |
[10] | Sohyeon P, Jwakyung S, Suyeon L, et al. Early Growth, Carbohydrate and Phytic Acid Contents of Germinating Rice Seeds under NaCl Stress[J]. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 2006, 51:137-141. |
[11] |
杜孝敬, 张燕红, 吕玉平, 等. 不同香稻品种种子萌发和苗期对NaCl胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4):827-838.
DOI |
DU Xiaojing, ZHANG Yanhong, LV Yuping, et al. Responses of Seeds of Different Fragrant Rice Varieties to NaCl Stress in Germination and Seedling Stages[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4):827-838.
DOI |
|
[12] | 周毅, 崔丰磊, 杨萍, 等. 盐胁迫对不同品种水稻幼苗生理生化特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(1): 90-93. |
ZHOU Yi, CUI Fenglei, YANG Ping, et al. Effects of salt stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of different rice J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(1): 90-93. | |
[13] | 徐晨, 凌风楼, 徐克章, 等. 盐胁迫对不同水稻品种光合特性和生理生化特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3): 280-286. |
XU Chen, LING Fenglou, XU Kezhang, et al. Effects of salt stress on Photosynthetic characteristics and physiological and biochemical traits of different rice J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(3): 280-286. | |
[14] | 谷娇娇, 胡博文, 贾琰, 等. 盐胁迫对水稻根系相关性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(4):176-182. |
GU Jiaojiao, HU Bowen, JIA Yan. et al. Effects of salt stress on root related traits and yield of rice[J]. Crops, 2019(4):176-182. | |
[15] | Ji-Bo M O, Da-Yong L I, Zhang H J. Roles of ERF transcription factors in biotic and abiotic stress response in J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2011, 47(12): 1145-1154. |
[16] | 刘鹏, 毕江涛, 罗成科, 等. 耐盐菌对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(2): 246-256. |
LIU Peng, BI Jiangtao, LUO Chengke, et al. Effects of salt-tolerant bacteria on rice seed germination and seedling growth under salt J]. Journal ofAgro-Environment Science, 2022, 41(2): 246-256. | |
[17] | 刘少芳, 王若愚. 植物根际促生细菌提高植物耐盐性研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019, 39(2): 1-12. |
LIU Shaofang, WANG Ruoyu. Advance in Research on Plant Salt Tolerance Improved byPlant-growth-promoting Rhizobacteria[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(2): 1-12. | |
[18] | 刘玲, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对水稻幼苗形态建成和生理特性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(1): 88-95. |
LIU Ling, FENG Naijie, ZHENG Dianfeng, et al. Effectsofdifferentmicrobialagentsonthemorphogenesisand physiologicalcharacteristicsofriceseedlings[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2022, 53(1): 88-95. | |
[19] | 辛树权, 王贵, 高扬. 植物生长促生菌对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(3): 490-496. |
XING Shuquan, WANG Gui, GAO Yang. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the rice germination and seedling development under salt stress[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 51(3): 490-496. | |
[20] | Zhang J, Hussain S, Zhao F, et al. Effects of Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens on nitrogen transformation and enzyme activity in the rice rhizosphere[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017, 18(4):1453-1465. |
[21] | Flowers T J, Yeo A R. Breeding for Salinity Resistance in Crop Plants: Where Next?[J]. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1995, 22(6):875-884. |
[22] |
王洋, 张瑞, 刘永昊, 等. 水稻对盐胁迫的响应及耐盐机理研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 105-117.
DOI |
WANG Yang, ZHANG Rui, LIU Yonghao, et al. Rice response to salt stress and research progress in salt tolerance mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 105-117.
DOI |
|
[23] |
Amirjani M R. Effect of NaCl stress on rice physiological [J]. Archives of Phytopathology Plant Protection, 2012, 45(2):228-243.
DOI URL |
[24] | Hussain S,. Zhang J Zhong et al. Effects of salt stress on rice growth, development characteristics, and the regulating ways: A [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(11):18. |
[25] | 梁正伟, 杨福, 王志春, 等. 盐碱胁迫对水稻主要生育性状的影响[J]. 生态环境, 2004, 13(1):43-46. |
LIANG Zhengwei, YANG Fu, WANG Zhichun, et al. Effect of the main growth characteristics of rice under saline-alkali[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2004, 13(1):43-46. | |
[26] | 朱明霞, 高显颖, 邵玺文, 等. 不同浓度盐碱胁迫对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2014, 39(6): 12-16. |
ZHU Mingxia, GAO Xianying, SHAO Xiwen, et al. Effect of different concentrations of saline-alkali stress on growth and yield of[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 39(6): 12-16. | |
[27] | 杨文钰, 屠乃美. 作物栽培学各论: 南方本[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011: 21-40. |
YANG Wenyu, TU Naimei. Treatise on Crop Cultivation: Southern Text[M]. Beijing: China Press, 2011: 21-40. | |
[28] | 杨娅坤, 赵飞, 刘建, 等. 盐碱胁迫对水稻的影响及其相关机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 分子植物育种: 1-17. |
YANG Yakun, ZHAO Fei, LIU Jian, et al. Research Progress of saline-alkali stress on rice and its related mechanism[J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding: 1-17. | |
[29] |
杨福, 梁正伟, 王志春. 苏打盐碱胁迫对水稻品种长白9号穗部性状及产量构成的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(S2): 59-61.
DOI |
YANG Fu, LIANG Zhengwei, WANG Zhichun. Effects of soda saline-sodic stress on thePanicletraits and yield components of rice variety Changbai 9[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2010, 25(S2): 59-61. | |
[30] | 荆培培, 崔敏, 秦涛, 等. 土培条件下不同盐分梯度对水稻产量及其生理特性的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(4): 26-33. |
JING Peipei, CUI Min, QIN Tao, et al. Effects of different saline stress on yield and physiological properties of rice in soil J]. China Rice, 2017, 23(4): 26-33. | |
[31] | 周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 等. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2): 146-154. |
ZHOU Genyou, ZHAI Caijiao, DENG Xianliang, et al. Performance of yield, photosynthesis and grain quality of japonica rice cultivars under salinity stress in micro-plots[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(2): 146-154. | |
[32] |
Vimal S R, Singh J S, Arora N K, et al. Soil-Plant-Microbe Interactions in Stressed Agriculture Management: A Review[J]. Pedosphere, 2017, 27(2):177-192.
DOI URL |
[33] | 井大炜, 马海林, 刘方春, 等. 盐胁迫环境下接种根际促生细菌对白蜡树根际生物学特征及其生长的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(1): 76-81. |
JING Dawei, MA Hailin, LIU Fangchun, et al. Effects of inoculation plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on biological characteristics of rhizosphere and growth of fraxinus chinensis undersalt[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 76-81. | |
[34] |
姜焕焕, 王通, 陈娜, 等. 根际促生菌提高植物抗盐碱性的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(10): 189-197.
DOI |
JIANG Huanhuan, WANG Tong, CHEN Na, et al. Research progress in PGPR improving plant’s resistance to salt and alkali[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(10): 189-197.
DOI |
|
[35] | 曾益波, 刘骏, 赵国盛, 等. 光合细菌PSB06浸种对水稻促生作用研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2018, 33(3): 50-53,85. |
ZENG Yibo, LIU Jun, ZHAO Guosheng, et al. Promoting effects of soaking seed with photosynthetic bacterium PSB06 on rice growth[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2018, 33(3): 50-53,85. | |
[36] |
武珈亦, 黄洁, 白志刚, 等. 盐胁迫下外源功能微生物调控水稻生长特征研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(1): 34-36.
DOI |
WU Jiayi, HUANG Jie, BAI Zhigang, et al. Study on growth characteristics of rice regulated by exogenous functional microorganisms under salt stress[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(1): 34-36.
DOI |
[1] | 来汉林, 沈煜洋, 陈利, 杨红, 李月, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 温度和盐胁迫对播娘蒿种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1326-1334. |
[2] | 王兴州, 时晓磊, 张恒, 曲可佳, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. 引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362. |
[3] | 张燕红, 侯天钰, 巴音花, 赵彩月, 吕玉平, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 赵志强, 李冬, 杜孝敬, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 水稻重组自交系群体芽期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1041-1049. |
[4] | 哈力旦·依克热木, 刘娜, 刘联正, 周安定, 姜奇彦, 达买力江·合孜尔, 曹俊梅, 张新忠. 小麦近缘种芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1118-1126. |
[5] | 陈丽靓, 鲁倩君, 马媛媛, 刘迎, 赵宝龙, 孙军利. 不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 880-888. |
[6] | 杨金钰, 乔小燕, 王西和, 孙九胜. NaCl胁迫对3种饲草种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 448-453. |
[7] | 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 张燕红, 袁杰, 赵志强, 文孝荣, 杜孝敬, 王奉斌, 吕玉平, 阿曼古丽·艾孜子. 新疆优质丰产香型水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703. |
[8] | 陈丽, 马静, 朱志明, 刘炜, 孙建昌. 基于水稻RIL群体的加工品质性状QTL分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2419-2425. |
[9] | 张红霞, 雍晓宇, 何飞, 夏军, 李慧琴, 王潭刚. 早熟陆地棉种萌发中种胚保护性酶活性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 1-10. |
[10] | 蒲胜海, 王则玉, 丁峰, 王彩风, 刘小利, 马晓鹏, 王涛, 彭银双, 李韵同. 膜下滴灌水稻生理生化特性对灌浆期控水的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2091-2103. |
[11] | 闫淼, 熊韬, 黄全生, 吴婷, 吴海波, 赵准, 胡国智. 外源水杨酸对单盐胁迫下哈密瓜叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2123-2129. |
[12] | 祁通, 黄建, 徐菲, 韩登旭. 复合盐胁迫对7个玉米品种萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1855-1863. |
[13] | 王强, 刘会芳, 韩宏伟, 庄红梅, 王柏柯, 王娟, 杨涛, 王浩, 秦勇. 基于 TMT和PRM 技术筛选番茄响应盐胁迫差异表达蛋白[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1418-1428. |
[14] | 李枭, 郭栋良, 李恭泽, 薛敏, 江海霞, 叶佳丽, 谢丽琼. 亚麻萌发期耐盐鉴定体系优化及150份种质耐盐性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1438-1449. |
[15] | 杜孝敬, 张燕红, 吕玉平, 袁杰, 李冬, 赵志强, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 王奉斌. 不同香稻品种种子萌发和苗期对NaCl胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 827-838. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||