新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 2979-2987.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.013
收稿日期:
2022-01-23
出版日期:
2022-12-20
发布日期:
2023-01-30
通信作者:
冶军
作者简介:
王露霞(1996-),女,河南南阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为新型肥料与现代施肥技术,(E-mail)18899592009@163.com
基金资助:
WANG Luxia(), SUO Changkai, CHU Xuan, YE Jun(), MIN Wei, HOU zhenan
Received:
2022-01-23
Online:
2022-12-20
Published:
2023-01-30
Correspondence author:
YE Jun
Supported by:
摘要: 【目的】 研究不同灌水量对旱稻(旱香1号)和水稻(粮香3号)的产量及生育特性的影响,为新疆旱稻种植的适宜灌溉量提供理论依据。【方法】 采用覆膜滴灌栽培模式,以旱稻和水稻为研究对象,水稻为对照,设置5个灌水量,分别为 375 mm(W1)、525 mm(W2)、675 mm(W3)、900 mm(W4)、1 125 mm(W5),研究滴灌覆膜下不同灌溉量对旱稻和水稻产量和生长发育的影响。【结果】 不同灌水处理下,旱稻和水稻随灌水量减少生育期延迟、株高、叶面积指数、干物质量、产量、WUE等呈下降趋势。675 mm(W3)处理下旱稻产量及WUE显著提高,分别为4 506 kg/hm2、0.67;1 125 mm(W5)处理下水稻产量最高为7 485 kg/hm2,WUE为0.67。当灌水量大于675 mm后增加灌溉量旱稻产量无显著差异,且旱稻在 675 mm(W3)灌溉量时比水稻产量高60.45%、水分利用效率高61.19%。旱稻各灌溉下产量平均值比水稻高11.24%、水分利用效率高10%、节水22.2%。【结论】 新疆干旱区种植旱稻受水分限制小,在节约水资源、提高产量的同时,新疆旱稻种植的最优灌水量为675 mm。
中图分类号:
王露霞, 索常凯, 褚璇, 冶军, 闵伟, 侯振安. 旱稻和水稻生长发育及产量对灌水量的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2979-2987.
WANG Luxia, SUO Changkai, CHU Xuan, YE Jun, MIN Wei, HOU zhenan. Response of Growth Development and Yield of Upland Rice and Paddy Rice to Irrigation Amount[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2979-2987.
分配比例 allocation proportion (%) | 苗期 Seedling stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 乳熟期 Filling stage | 汇总 Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 100 | ||
处理 Treatments | W1 | 75 | 112.5 | 56.25 | 56.25 | 75 | 375 |
W2 | 105 | 157.5 | 78.75 | 78.75 | 105 | 525 | |
W3 | 135 | 202.5 | 101.25 | 101.25 | 135 | 675 | |
W4 | 180 | 270 | 135 | 135 | 180 | 900 | |
W5 | 225 | 337.5 | 168.75 | 168.75 | 225 | 1125 |
表1 不同处理灌溉定额
Table 1 Irrigation quotas for different treatments(mm)
分配比例 allocation proportion (%) | 苗期 Seedling stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 乳熟期 Filling stage | 汇总 Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 100 | ||
处理 Treatments | W1 | 75 | 112.5 | 56.25 | 56.25 | 75 | 375 |
W2 | 105 | 157.5 | 78.75 | 78.75 | 105 | 525 | |
W3 | 135 | 202.5 | 101.25 | 101.25 | 135 | 675 | |
W4 | 180 | 270 | 135 | 135 | 180 | 900 | |
W5 | 225 | 337.5 | 168.75 | 168.75 | 225 | 1125 |
处理 Treatments | 苗期 Seedling stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 乳熟期 Filling stage | 全生育期 Whole growth period | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | 34 | 27 | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 34 | 25 | 12 | 15 | 43 | 129 | |
W3 | 34 | 24 | 11 | 15 | 42 | 126 | |
W4 | 34 | 24 | 11 | 15 | 42 | 126 | |
W5 | 34 | 24 | 11 | 15 | 42 | 126 | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | 34 | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 34 | / | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 34 | 54 | 19 | 15 | 24 | 142 | |
W4 | 34 | 52 | 15 | 15 | 23 | 139 | |
W5 | 34 | 52 | 15 | 15 | 23 | 139 |
表2 不同灌溉定额下生育阶段变化
Table 2 Observation of growth stages under different irrigation quotas (d)
处理 Treatments | 苗期 Seedling stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 乳熟期 Filling stage | 全生育期 Whole growth period | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | 34 | 27 | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 34 | 25 | 12 | 15 | 43 | 129 | |
W3 | 34 | 24 | 11 | 15 | 42 | 126 | |
W4 | 34 | 24 | 11 | 15 | 42 | 126 | |
W5 | 34 | 24 | 11 | 15 | 42 | 126 | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | 34 | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 34 | / | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 34 | 54 | 19 | 15 | 24 | 142 | |
W4 | 34 | 52 | 15 | 15 | 23 | 139 | |
W5 | 34 | 52 | 15 | 15 | 23 | 139 |
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 乳熟期 Filling stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | 0.79ab | 1.49a | / | / | / |
W2 | 0.62b | 1.9a | 1.79a | 2.7a | 1.89a | |
W3 | 0.96a | 2.02a | 2.03a | 2.96a | 2.57a | |
W4 | 0.71b | 1.64a | 1.83a | 2.46a | 2.38a | |
W5 | 0.8ab | 1.96a | 2.09a | 2.27a | 2.54a | |
Mean | 0.77B | 1.8B | 1.55B | 2.08B | 1.88B | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | 1.24b | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 1.54b | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 1.93a | 3.64ab | 6.19a | 7.3b | 4.1ab | |
W4 | 1.96a | 4.1a | 6.88a | 7.49b | 4.77ab | |
W5 | 1.96a | 4.93a | 7a | 8.82a | 5.74a | |
Mean | 1.72A | 2.53A | 4.01A | 4.72A | 2.92A | |
两因素方差分析(显著性) Two-way ANOVA (Significance) | ||||||
C | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
C*W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
表3 不同灌水量下旱稻和水稻叶面积指数变化
Table 3 Influence of different irrigation amount on LAI of upland rice and rice
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 孕穗期 Booting stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 乳熟期 Filling stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | 0.79ab | 1.49a | / | / | / |
W2 | 0.62b | 1.9a | 1.79a | 2.7a | 1.89a | |
W3 | 0.96a | 2.02a | 2.03a | 2.96a | 2.57a | |
W4 | 0.71b | 1.64a | 1.83a | 2.46a | 2.38a | |
W5 | 0.8ab | 1.96a | 2.09a | 2.27a | 2.54a | |
Mean | 0.77B | 1.8B | 1.55B | 2.08B | 1.88B | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | 1.24b | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 1.54b | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 1.93a | 3.64ab | 6.19a | 7.3b | 4.1ab | |
W4 | 1.96a | 4.1a | 6.88a | 7.49b | 4.77ab | |
W5 | 1.96a | 4.93a | 7a | 8.82a | 5.74a | |
Mean | 1.72A | 2.53A | 4.01A | 4.72A | 2.92A | |
两因素方差分析(显著性) Two-way ANOVA (Significance) | ||||||
C | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
C*W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期Tillering stage | 孕穗期Booting stage | 齐穗期Full heading stage | 成熟期Maturity stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 | 茎鞘 | 叶片 | 茎鞘 | 叶片 | 茎鞘 | 穗 | 叶片 | 茎鞘 | 穗 | ||
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | 40.33c | 59.67a | 33.33a | 66.67b | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 44a | 56c | 33.67a | 66.33b | 30.67a | 60.67a | 8.67c | 16.67a | 51.33a | 32b | |
W3 | 42.67ab | 57.33bc | 34.67a | 65.33b | 29.67ab | 57.33ab | 13bc | 12b | 38b | 50a | |
W4 | 42bc | 58ab | 28.33b | 71.67a | 23.67c | 55.33b | 21.33a | 10.67b | 38.33b | 51a | |
W5 | 42.67ab | 57.33bc | 32.67a | 67.33a | 26.67ab | 59ab | 14b | 12b | 37.67b | 50a | |
Mean | 42.33B | 57.67A | 32.53A | 67.47A | 22.13A | 46.47A | 11.4A | 10.27A | 33.07A | 36.6A | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | 45.67bc | 54.33ab | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 46.67abc | 53.33abc | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 48.67a | 51.33c | 39.67a | 60.33a | 33a | 63.67a | 4b | 18.67a | 65.67a | 15b | |
W4 | 47.67ab | 52.33bc | 38.33a | 61.67a | 29b | 64.67a | 6.67a | 14b | 46.67b | 39.67a | |
W5 | 45.33c | 54.67a | 38.67a | 61.33a | 29b | 64a | 7a | 15.67b | 42.33b | 42a | |
Mean | 46.8A | 53.2B | 23.33B | 36.67B | 18.2B | 38.47B | 3.53B | 9.67A | 30.93B | 19.33B | |
两因素方差分析(显著性)Two-way ANOVA (Significance) | |||||||||||
C | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | * | ** | |
W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
C*W | * | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
表4 不同灌水量下地上部不同器官干物质分配率变化
Table 4 Influence of different irrigation amount on dry matter distribution rate of different aboveground organs (%)
处理 Treatments | 分蘖期Tillering stage | 孕穗期Booting stage | 齐穗期Full heading stage | 成熟期Maturity stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 | 茎鞘 | 叶片 | 茎鞘 | 叶片 | 茎鞘 | 穗 | 叶片 | 茎鞘 | 穗 | ||
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | 40.33c | 59.67a | 33.33a | 66.67b | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 44a | 56c | 33.67a | 66.33b | 30.67a | 60.67a | 8.67c | 16.67a | 51.33a | 32b | |
W3 | 42.67ab | 57.33bc | 34.67a | 65.33b | 29.67ab | 57.33ab | 13bc | 12b | 38b | 50a | |
W4 | 42bc | 58ab | 28.33b | 71.67a | 23.67c | 55.33b | 21.33a | 10.67b | 38.33b | 51a | |
W5 | 42.67ab | 57.33bc | 32.67a | 67.33a | 26.67ab | 59ab | 14b | 12b | 37.67b | 50a | |
Mean | 42.33B | 57.67A | 32.53A | 67.47A | 22.13A | 46.47A | 11.4A | 10.27A | 33.07A | 36.6A | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | 45.67bc | 54.33ab | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 46.67abc | 53.33abc | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 48.67a | 51.33c | 39.67a | 60.33a | 33a | 63.67a | 4b | 18.67a | 65.67a | 15b | |
W4 | 47.67ab | 52.33bc | 38.33a | 61.67a | 29b | 64.67a | 6.67a | 14b | 46.67b | 39.67a | |
W5 | 45.33c | 54.67a | 38.67a | 61.33a | 29b | 64a | 7a | 15.67b | 42.33b | 42a | |
Mean | 46.8A | 53.2B | 23.33B | 36.67B | 18.2B | 38.47B | 3.53B | 9.67A | 30.93B | 19.33B | |
两因素方差分析(显著性)Two-way ANOVA (Significance) | |||||||||||
C | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | * | ** | |
W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
C*W | * | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
处理 Treatments | 成穗数 Panicle number (×104/hm2) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight (g) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 水分利用效率 IWUE (kg/m3) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 476a | 17.89c | 48.7b | 47a | 1 966b | 0.37d | |
W3 | 528a | 19.4b | 79.4a | 56a | 4 506a | 0.67a | |
W4 | 506a | 20.96a | 81.1a | 56a | 4 786a | 0.53b | |
W5 | 504a | 20.47a | 82a | 58a | 4 815a | 0.43c | |
Mean | 403A | 15.75A | 58.2A | 43A | 3 215A | 0.40A | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 366b | 24.07b | 36.4a | 53c | 1 782c | 0.26c | |
W4 | 434a | 27.12a | 66.2a | 66b | 5 181b | 0.56b | |
W5 | 451a | 27.84a | 52.9a | 82a | 7 485a | 0.67a | |
Mean | 263B | 16.56A | 32.5B | 43A | 2 890B | 0.30B | |
两因素方差分析(显著性)Two-way ANOVA (Significance) | |||||||
C | ** | ns | ** | ns | * | ** | |
W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
C*W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
表5 不同灌水量下产量及产量构成因素差异比较
Table 5 Differences in yields and yield components under different irrigation volumes
处理 Treatments | 成穗数 Panicle number (×104/hm2) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight (g) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 水分利用效率 IWUE (kg/m3) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旱稻 Upland rice | W1 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | 476a | 17.89c | 48.7b | 47a | 1 966b | 0.37d | |
W3 | 528a | 19.4b | 79.4a | 56a | 4 506a | 0.67a | |
W4 | 506a | 20.96a | 81.1a | 56a | 4 786a | 0.53b | |
W5 | 504a | 20.47a | 82a | 58a | 4 815a | 0.43c | |
Mean | 403A | 15.75A | 58.2A | 43A | 3 215A | 0.40A | |
水稻 Rice | W1 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
W2 | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
W3 | 366b | 24.07b | 36.4a | 53c | 1 782c | 0.26c | |
W4 | 434a | 27.12a | 66.2a | 66b | 5 181b | 0.56b | |
W5 | 451a | 27.84a | 52.9a | 82a | 7 485a | 0.67a | |
Mean | 263B | 16.56A | 32.5B | 43A | 2 890B | 0.30B | |
两因素方差分析(显著性)Two-way ANOVA (Significance) | |||||||
C | ** | ns | ** | ns | * | ** | |
W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
C*W | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
[1] | 程勇翔, 王秀珍, 郭建平, 等. 中国水稻生产的时空动态分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(17):3473-3485. |
CHENG Yongxiang, WANG Xiuzhen, Guo Jianping, et al. The temporal-spatial dyinamic analysis of China Rice production[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(17):3473-3485. | |
[2] |
Seck P A, Diagne A, Mohanty S, et al. Crops that feed the world 7: Rice[J]. Food Security, 2012, 4(1):7-24.
DOI URL |
[3] |
马丙菊, 常雨晴, 景文疆, 等. 水稻水分高效利用的机理研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(3):15-20.
DOI |
MA Bingju, CHANG Yuqing, JING Wenjiang, etc.Advances in research on mechanism of efficient water use in rice[J]. China Rice, 2019, 25(3):15-20. | |
[4] | 郑海燕. 水资源环境问题及可持续发展管理措施[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2017,(4):100-101. |
ZHENG Haiyan. Water resource environmental problems and sustainable development management measures[J]. Resources Conservation and Environmental Protection, 2017,(4):100-101. | |
[5] | 胡莹, 黄益宗, 段桂兰, 等. 镉对不同生态型水稻的毒性及其在水稻体内迁移转运[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2012, 7(6):664-670. |
HU Ying, HUANG Yizong, DUAN Guilan, et al. Toxicity of cadmium to different ecotypes of rice and its transport in rice[J]. Acta Ecotoxicologica Sinica, 2012, 7(6):664-670. | |
[6] | 丁颖. 中国水稻品种的生态类型及其与生产发展的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 1964,(10):5-10. |
DING Yin. Ecological types of rice varieties in China and their relationship with production development[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1964,(10):5-10. | |
[7] | 黄晨. 冀中南地区旱稻生产现状及发展对策[J]. 河北农业, 2018,(8):55-57. |
HuANG Cheng. Current situation and development countermeasures of upland rice production in central and southern Hebei[J]. Hebei Agriculture, 2018,(8):55-57. | |
[8] | 崔晓军, 薛昌颖, 杨晓光, 等. 不同水分处理旱稻农田蒸散特征和水分利用效率[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008,(4):49-54. |
CUI Xiaojun, XUE Changying, YANG Xiaoguang, et al. Characteristics of evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of upland rice under different water treatments[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2008,(4):49-54. | |
[9] | 张耗, 剧成欣, 陈婷婷, 等. 节水灌溉对节水抗旱水稻品种产量的影响及生理基础[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(23):4782-4793. |
ZHANG Hao, JU Chengxin, CHEN Tingting, et al. Effects of water-saving irrigation on yield and physiological basis of water-saving and drought-resistant rice varieties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(23):4782-4793. | |
[10] | 白丽荣, 郭晓丽, 苏长青, 等. 旱稻研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 河南农业科学, 2012, 41(5):1-3. |
BAI Lirong, GUO Xiaoli, SU Changqing, et al. Current situation and development trend of upland rice research[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 41(5):1-3. | |
[11] | 朱旭东. 水稻与陆稻的耐旱性及产量潜力的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006. |
ZHU Xudong. Study on drought tolerance and yield potential of rice and upland rice[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2006. | |
[12] | 杨翠玲. 水稻需水规律及合理灌溉方法[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2013,(2):75-76. |
YANG Cuiling. Water requirement of rice and rational irrigation methods[J]. Agricultural Development and Equipment, 2013,(2):75-76. | |
[13] | 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰, 等. 灌溉方式与种植密度对寒地水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6):159-169. |
ZHAO Liming, LI Ming, ZHENG Dianfeng, et al. Effects of irrigation methods and planting density on rice yield and photosynthetic substance production characteristics in cold region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(6):159-169. | |
[14] | Stone E C, Hornberger G M. Impacts of management alternatives on rice yield and nitrogen losses to the environment: A case study in rural Sri Lanka[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 542 (JAN.15PT.A):271-276. |
[15] | 陈婷婷, 杨建昌. 移栽水稻高产高效节水灌溉技术的生理生化机理研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(1):103-110. |
CHEN Tingting, YANG Jianchang. Advances in physiological and biochemical mechanisms of high-yield and water-saving irrigation in transplanting rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(1):103-110. | |
[16] | 侯丹平, 谭金松, 毕庆宇, 等. 水分胁迫对节水抗旱稻产量形成和根系形态生理特性的影响[J/OL]. 中国水稻科学:1-14 |
HOU Danping, TAN Jinsong, BI Qingyu, et al. Effects of water stress on yield formation and root morphological and physiological characteristics of water-saving and drought-resistant rice[J/OL]. Rice Science in China:1-14 | |
[17] | 胡继芳. 拔节孕穗期水分控制对不同旱稻品种生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020,(4):178-182. |
HU Jifang. Effects of water control at jointing and booting stage on growth, development and yield of different upland rice varieties[J]. Crop Journal, 2020,(4):178-182. | |
[18] | 于靖, 徐淑琴, 高婷. 分蘖期不同程度水分胁迫对水稻需水规律及生长发育的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2012,(7):21-23. |
YU Jing, XU Shuqin, GAO Ting. Effects of different degrees of water stress at tillering stage on water requirement and growth of rice[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2012,(7):21-23. | |
[19] | 邵玺文, 张瑞珍, 齐春艳, 等. 拔节孕穗期水分胁迫对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2004,(3):237-241. |
SHAO Xiwen, ZHANG Ruizhen, QI Chunyan, et al. Effects of water stress on growth and yield of rice at jointing and booting stage[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2004,(3):237-241. | |
[20] | 陈展宇, 徐克章, 吴磊, 等. 旱作条件下旱稻和水稻叶片光合特性及RuBP羧化酶活性的比较[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(5):87-91, 98. |
CHEN Zhanyu, XU Kezhang, WU Lei, et al. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics and RuBP carboxylase activity between upland rice and rice under dry cropping conditions[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Ed.), 2012, 40(5):87-91, 98. | |
[21] |
徐一兰, 刘唐兴, 付爱斌. 不同灌溉方式对双季稻植株生理特性和干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(5):106-115.
DOI |
XU Yilan, LIU Tangxing, FU Aibin. Effects of different irrigation methods on plant physiological characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield of double cropping rice[J]. Journal of North China Agriculture, 2019, 34(5):106-115. | |
[22] | 马晓鹏, 莫彦, 吕玉平, 等. 不同灌水量与每穴直播粒数对滴灌水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(9):1-7. |
MA Xiaopeng, MO Yan, LU Yuping, et al. Effects of different irrigation amount and seed number per hole on growth and yield of rice under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2019, 38(9):1-7. | |
[23] | 邓环, 曹凑贵, 程建平, 等. 不同灌溉方式对水稻生物学特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008,(3):602-606. |
DENG Huan, CAO Caogui, CHENG Jianping, et al. Effects of different irrigation methods on biological characteristics of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008,(3):602-606. | |
[24] | 徐强, 吕廷波, 马晓鹏, 等. 水分调控和栽培方式对滴灌水稻生长及灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(1):46-52. |
XU Qiang, LV Tingbo, MA Xiaopeng, et al. Effects of water regulation and cultivation methods on rice growth and irrigation water utilization efficiency under drip irrigation[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(1):46-52. | |
[25] | 王贺正, 徐国伟, 马均, 等. 水分胁迫对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国种业, 2009,(1):47-49. |
WANG Hezheng, XU Guowei, MA Jun, et al. Effects of water stress on growth and yield of rice[J]. China Seed Industry, 2009,(1):47-49. | |
[26] | 董淑喜, 徐淑琴. 水分胁迫对寒区水稻生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2008, 27(6): 64-66. |
DONG Shuxi, XU Shuqin. Effects of water stress on growth characteristics and yield of rice in cold region[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2008, 27(6): 64-66. | |
[27] | RRomeo J, Cabangon, et al. Effect of irrigation method and N-fertilizer management on rice yield, water productivity and nutrient-use efficiencies in typical lowland rice conditions in China[J]. Paddy&Water Environment, 2004, 2(4):195-206. |
[28] |
李俊峰, 杨建昌. 水分与氮素及其互作对水稻产量和水肥利用效率的影响研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 327-334.
DOI |
LI Junfeng, YANG Jianchang. Effects of water and nitrogen on rice yield and water and fertilizer use efficiency[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2017, 31(3): 327-334.
DOI |
[1] | 陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[2] | 杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[3] | 陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[4] | 王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[5] | 王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[6] | 向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181. |
[7] | 杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[8] | 宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247. |
[9] | 马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313. |
[10] | 王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[11] | 董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[12] | 李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[13] | 张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939. |
[14] | 魏迎凤, 张全成, 查慧, 王小丽, 王俊刚. 二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育和生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021. |
[15] | 王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||