化肥减施增施黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥对骏枣生长及品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.013

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 2192-2199.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.013

• 园艺特产·贮藏保鲜加工·土壤肥料·节水灌溉·草业·食品工艺技术 • 上一篇下一篇

化肥减施增施黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥对骏枣生长及品质的影响

邵华伟¹(), 孟阿静¹, 唐燕², 周燕³(), 程新瑛⁴, 唐蕾³, 王新勇¹

1.新疆农业科学院土壤肥料与农业节水研究所，乌鲁木齐 830091
2.阿克苏市林业技术推广服务中心，新疆阿克苏 843000
3.新疆益果生物科技有限责任公司，新疆阿克苏 843000
4.温宿县林业和草原集局，新疆温宿 843100

收稿日期:2021-12-10 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2023-01-16
通信作者: 周燕
作者简介:邵华伟（1978-），男，河南上蔡人，副研究员，研究方向为土壤培肥与新型肥料，（E-mail）18666185@qq.com
基金资助:
自治区重点研发计划“新型绿色肥料技术研发集成与示范”(2019B00006)

Effects of Reducing Fertilizer Application and Increasing Application of Fulvic Acid Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate Water-soluble Formula Fertilizer on the Growth and Quality of Junzao Jujube

SHAO Huawei¹(), MENG Ajing¹, TANG Yan², ZHOU Yan³(), CHENG Xinying⁴, TANG Lei³, WANG Xinyong¹

1. Institute of Soil， Fertilizer and Water Conservation， Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences， Urumqi 830091， China
2. Aksu Forestry Technology Extension Service Center， Aksu Xinjiang 843000， China
3. Xinjiang Yiguo Biotechnology Co.， Ltd.， Wensu Xinjiang 843000， China
4. Wensu County Forestry and Grassland Bureau， Aksu Xinjiang 843100， China

Received:2021-12-10 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2023-01-16
Correspondence author: ZHOU Yan
Supported by:
Key R & D Program Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “New Green Fertilizer Technology Research and Its Development Integration and Demonstration”(2019B00006)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 研究化肥减施情况下增施黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥对骏枣生长及品质的影响，为骏枣栽培中减少化肥的使用、增施黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥提供科学依据。【方法】 以骏枣为材料，采取随机区组试验，共设5个施肥处理，以常规施肥为对照（CK）；设置4个不同施用黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥用量分别为60 kg/667 m²（T₁）、96 kg/667 m²（T₂）、120 kg/667 m²（T₃）、144 kg/667 m²（T₄），化肥减施率分别为65%、45%、31%、17%。以滴灌的方式分11次施入试验小区。在果实成熟期，测定其叶片长度、叶片宽度、枣吊长度、果形指数、裂果率、黑头率、果实品质和产量等指标，分析化肥减施下增施不同量黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥对骏枣生长及品质的影响。【结果】 在T₄处理下骏枣的叶片长和宽均增加，T₃、T₄处理枣吊长度显著增加；T₃处理与CK相比裂果率降低了45.78%，T₄处理与CK相比黑头率降低了69.50%；T₄处理显著增加了单果重和产量，分别较对照增加了18.87%和13.62%，各处理较对照均提高了VC含量和还原糖含量，总酸含量在各处理下均显著低于对照，T3处理总酸含量较CK降低了40.00%，T₄处理的蛋白质含量较对照稍有增加。【结论】 在黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥用量为144 kg/667 m² （化肥减施率17%）处理可以显著降骏枣低果实裂果率和黑头率，有效促进骏枣生长、提高产量和提升果实品质，黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥最佳施用量为144 kg/667 m²。

关键词: 化肥减施; 黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥; 骏枣; 产量; 品质

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effect of increasing application of fulvic acid potassium dihydrogen phosphate water-soluble formula fertilizer on the growth and quality of Junzao jujube under the circumstance of reducing chemical fertilizer application in the hope of providing some scientific basis. 【Method】 With Junzao as the experimental material， a random block group experiment was adopted， and a total of 5 fertilization treatments were set up， and conventional fertilization was used as the control （CK）. 60 kg/667 m² （T₁）， 96 kg/667 m² （T₂）， 120 kg/667 m² （T₃）， 144 kg/667 m² （T₄）， the fertilizer reduction rates were 65%， 45%， 31%， and 17%， respectively. It was applied to the experimental plot 11 times by drip irrigation. During the fruit maturity period， the leaf length， leaf width， jujube hanging length， fruit shape index， fruit cracking rate， blackhead rate， fruit quality and yield were measured， and the application of different amounts of fulvic acid phosphoric acid was analyzed under the condition of reduced application of chemical fertilizers. Meanwhile， effects of potassium hydrogen water-soluble formula fertilizer on the growth and quality of Junzao jujube were studied. 【Result】 The test results showed that the leaf length and width of Junzao increased under T₄ treatment， and the length of jujube hangings increased significantly in T₃ and T₄ treatments. At the same time， compared with CK， T₃ treatment decreased by 45.78%， and T₄ treatment was significantly higher than that of CK. Compared with the control， the blackhead rate decreased by 69.50%； the T₄ treatment significantly increased the single fruit weight and yield， which were 18.87% and 13.62% higher than the control， respectively. Compared with the control， each treatment increased the VC content and reducing sugar content and the VC content of the T₂treatment was similar. Compared with CK， it increased by 78.75%， and the total acid content in each treatment was significantly lower than that of the control. The total acid content of T₃ treatment decreased by 40.00% compared with CK， and the protein content of T₄ treatment was slightly increased compared with the control. 【Conclusion】 Comprehensive analysis in the treatment of 144 kg/667 m² of fulvic acid potassium dihydrogen phosphate water-soluble formula fertilizer （chemical fertilizer reduction rate of 17%） can significantly reduce the low fruit cracking rate and blackhead rate of Junzao， effectively promote its growth， thus improving yield and improve fruit quality； The optimum application rate of fulvic acid potassium dihydrogen phosphate water-soluble formula fertilizer in this experiment was 144 kg/667 m².

Key words: chemical fertilizer reduction; fulvic acid potassium dihydrogen phosphate water-soluble formula fertilizer; Junzao; yield; quality

中图分类号:

S14
S665.1

邵华伟, 孟阿静, 唐燕, 周燕, 程新瑛, 唐蕾, 王新勇. 化肥减施增施黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥对骏枣生长及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2192-2199.

SHAO Huawei, MENG Ajing, TANG Yan, ZHOU Yan, CHENG Xinying, TANG Lei, WANG Xinyong. Effects of Reducing Fertilizer Application and Increasing Application of Fulvic Acid Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate Water-soluble Formula Fertilizer on the Growth and Quality of Junzao Jujube[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2192-2199.

图/表 5

参考文献 27

[1]	崔亚荣. 化肥减量增施有机肥对骏枣生长的影响[D]. 延安: 延安大学, 2018.
	CUI Yarong. Effects of reducing the amount of chemical fertilizers and increasing the application of organic fertilizers on the growth of Junzao jujube[D]. Yan'an: Yan'an University, 2018.
[2]	包艳丽, 程红梅, 张利召. 新疆红枣产业发展研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2022, 33(1):145-146,152.
	BAO Yanli, CHENG Hongmei, ZHANG Lizhao, et al. Research on the development of jujube industry in Xinjiang[J]. Rural Economy and Technology, 2022, 33(1):145-146,152.
[3]	李秀芬, 朱金兆, 顾晓君, 等. 农业面源污染现状与防治进展[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(4):81-84.
	LI Xiufen, ZHU Jinzhao, GU Xiaojun, et al. Current Situation and Prevention and Control of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution[J]. China Population·Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(4):81-84.
[4]	张维理, 武淑霞, 冀宏杰, 等. 中国农业面源污染形势估计及控制对策 I.21世纪初期中国农业面源污染的形势估计[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004,(7):1008-1017.
	ZHANG Weili, WU Shuxia, JI Hongjie, et al.. Situation Estimation and Control Countermeasures of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution in China I. Situation Estimation of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution in China in the Early 21st Century[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science, 2004,(7): 1008-1017.
[5]	李东坡, 武志杰. 化学肥料的土壤生态环境效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008,(5):1158-1165. PMID
	LI Dongpo, WU Zhijie. Effects of Chemical Fertilizers on Soil Ecological Environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008,(5):1158-1165. PMID
[6]	张北赢, 陈天林, 王兵. 长期施用化肥对土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(11):182-187.
	ZHANG Beiying, CHEN Tianlin, WANG Bing. Effects of long-term application of chemical fertilizers on soil quality[J]. China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(11):182-187.
[7]	Ekenler M., Tabatabai M A. Effects of limingand tillage systems on microbial biomass and glycosidases insoils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2003, 39(1) : 51-61. DOI URL
[8]	Matsuyama N, Saigusa M, Sakaiya E, et al. Acidification and Soil Productivity of Allophanic Andosols Affected by Heavy Application of Fertilizers[J]. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 2005, 51(1) :117-123.
[9]	陆欣欣, 岳玉波, 赵峥, 等. 不同施肥处理稻田系统磷素输移特征研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(4):394-400.
	LU Xinxin, YUE Yubo, ZHAO Zheng, et al. Study on the characteristics of phosphorus transport in paddy field systems with different fertilization treatments[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 2014, 22(4):394-400.
[10]	王虎兵. 日光温室膜下滴灌番茄对水肥响应的研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
	WANG Hubing. Study on the Response of Tomatoes to Water and Fertilizer by Drip Irrigation under Film in Solar Greenhouse[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019.
[11]	Tayefeh M, Sadeghi S M, Noorhosseini S A, et al. Environmental impact of rice production based on nitrogen fertilizer use[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(16):15885 -15895. DOI URL
[12]	Ahmed M, Rauf M, Mukhtar Z, et al. Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: An unawareness causing serious threats environment and human health[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(35):26983-26987. DOI URL
[13]	贺会强, 陈凯利, 邹志荣, 等. 不同施肥水平对日光温室番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(7):135-140.
	HE Huiqiang, CHEN Kaili, ZOU Zhirong, et al. Effects of different fertilization levels on yield and quality of tomato in solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Ed.), 2012, 40(7):135-140.
[14]	韩文质. 腐植酸类肥料对土壤的改良作用及施用方法[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 1997,(6):33-34.
	HAN Wenzhi. Effects of humic acid fertilizers on soil improvement and application methods[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 1997,(6):33-34.
[15]	苏初连, 邓爱妮, 范琼, 等. 腐植酸型功能肥料对酸化土壤改良和香蕉生长的作用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 22(6): 1923-1929.
	SU Chulian, DENG Aini, FAN Qiong, et al. Effects of humic acid-type functional fertilizers on acidified soil improvement and banana growth[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 22(6): 1923-1929.
[16]	章智明, 黄占斌, 单瑞娟. 腐植酸对土壤改良作用探讨[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2013, 38(3):109-111.
	ZHANG Zhiming, HUANG Zhanbin, SHAN Ruijuan. Discussion on the effect of humic acid on soil improvement[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2013, 38(3):109-111.
[17]	王官茂, 杨茂峰, 李志燕, 等. 黄腐酸对马铃薯产量和商品薯率的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2016, 30(1):25-30.
	WANG Guanmao, YANG Maofeng, LI Zhiyan, et al. Effects of fulvic acid on potato yield and commercial potato yield[J]. China Potato, 2016, 30(1):25-30.
[18]	张亚飞, 罗静静, 彭福田, 等. 黄腐酸钾与化肥控释袋促进桃树生长及氮肥吸收利用[J]. 腐植酸, 2019,(6):37.
	ZHANG Yafei, LUO Jingjing, PENG Futian, et al. Potassium humate and chemical fertilizer controlled-release bag to promote peach tree growth and nitrogen fertilizer absorption and utilization[J]. Humic Acid, 2019,(6):37.
[19]	赵世杰, 史国安, 董新纯. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002.
	ZHAO S J, SHI G A, DONG X C. Guidance of Plant Physiology Experiments>[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002.
[20]	库尔班江, 赛丽曼. 碘量法测水果蔬菜中维生素 C 的含量[J]. 伊犁师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2007,(3): 29-32.
	Kuerbanjiang, Sailiman. Determination of ascorbic acid in vegetables and fruits by eudiometry[J]. Journal of Yili Normal University (Natural Science Ed.), 2007,(3): 29-32.
[21]	龙建春, 邓浩, 秦江南, 等. 新型黄腐酸肥对新温185核桃提质增效的效果[J]. 落叶果树, 2021, 53(3):24-26.
	LONG Jianchun, DENG Hao, QIN Jiangnan, et al. Effect of new fulvic acid fertilizer on quality improvement and efficiency of Xinwen 185 walnut[J]. Deciduous Fruit Trees, 2021, 53(3):24-26.
[22]	宋挚, 郭新送, 范仲卿, 等. 叶面喷施黄腐酸钾对水稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 腐植酸, 2022,(1):52-55.
	SONG Zhi, GUO Xinsong, FAN Zhongqing, et al. Effects of Foliar Spraying Potassium Fulvic Acid on Rice Yield and Quality[J]. Humic Acid, 2022,(1):52-55.
[23]	张丽丽, 史庆华, 巩彪. 中、碱性土壤条件下黄腐酸与磷肥配施对番茄生育和磷素利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17):3567-3575.
	ZHANG Lili, SHI Qinghua, GONG Biao. Effects of combined application of fulvic acid and phosphorus fertilizer on tomato growth and phosphorus utilization under moderate and alkaline soil conditions[J]. China Agricultural Science, 2020, 53(17):3567-3575.
[24]	何流. 专用配方套餐肥和黄腐酸肥料在富士苹果上的应用[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018.
	HE Liu. Application of special formula package fertilizer and fulvic acid fertilizer on Fuji apple[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018.
[25]	闫嘉欣, 常青, 杨治平, 等. 黄腐酸液体配方肥对大棚黄瓜产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(10):47-51.
	YAN Jiaxin, CHANG Qing, YANG Zhiping, et al. Effects of fulvic acid liquid formula fertilizer on yield and quality of cucumber in greenhouse[J]. China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(10):47-51.
[26]	姚东伟. 黄腐酸对番茄生长、产量及光合特性的影响[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2003.
	Yao Dongwei. Effects of fulvic acid on tomato growth, yield and photosynthetic characteristics[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2003.
[27]	刘彩娟, 吕春雨, 艾希珍, 等. 黄腐酸对干旱胁迫下黄瓜光合特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1300-1310.. DOI
	LIU Caijuan, LU Chunyu, AI Xizhen, et al. Effects of fulvic acid on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality of cucumber under drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1300-1310. DOI

处理 Treatment	施肥种类及用量 Fertilizer type and amount	总养分（N+P₂O₅+K₂O） Total nutrients （kg/667m²）	化肥减施率 Fertilizer reduction rate （%）	黄腐酸含量 Fulvic acid content （kg/667m²）
CK	尿素45 kg，磷酸一铵50 kg；硫酸钾35 kg	69.7	0	0
T₁	60 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	24.0	65%	6.0
T₂	96 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	38.4	45%	9.6
T₃	120 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	48.0	31%	12.0
T₄	144 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	57.6	17%	14.4

处理 Treatment	施肥种类及用量 Fertilizer type and amount	总养分（N+P₂O₅+K₂O） Total nutrients （kg/667m²）	化肥减施率 Fertilizer reduction rate （%）	黄腐酸含量 Fulvic acid content （kg/667m²）
CK	尿素45 kg，磷酸一铵50 kg；硫酸钾35 kg	69.7	0	0
T₁	60 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	24.0	65%	6.0
T₂	96 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	38.4	45%	9.6
T₃	120 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	48.0	31%	12.0
T₄	144 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥	57.6	17%	14.4

处理 Treatment	枣吊长度 Date hanging length （cm）	叶片长 Blade length （cm）	叶片宽 Blade width （cm）
CK	63.33±6.81^ab	10.50±1.32^a	5.83±0.29^ab
T₁	55.00±4.00^b	8.67±2.08^a	4.53±0.58^b
T₂	64.33±7.77^ab	9.67±1.53^a	4.43±0.21^b
T₃	71.67±1.53^a	9.83±0.76^a	5.23±0.41^b
T₄	72.33±1.55^a	11.33±1.89^a	6.83±1.76^a

处理 Treatment	枣吊长度 Date hanging length （cm）	叶片长 Blade length （cm）	叶片宽 Blade width （cm）
CK	63.33±6.81^ab	10.50±1.32^a	5.83±0.29^ab
T₁	55.00±4.00^b	8.67±2.08^a	4.53±0.58^b
T₂	64.33±7.77^ab	9.67±1.53^a	4.43±0.21^b
T₃	71.67±1.53^a	9.83±0.76^a	5.23±0.41^b
T₄	72.33±1.55^a	11.33±1.89^a	6.83±1.76^a

处理 Treatment	VC含量 VC content（mg/g）	还原糖 Reducing sugar（%）	总酸 Acid value（%）	蛋白质 Protein（%）
CK	3.20±0.24^d	30.51±1.49^b	0.60±0.07^a	6.63±0.12^a
T₁	4.37±0.14^c	33.41±2.25^ab	0.43±0.03^bc	6.42±0.31^a
T₂	5.73±0.25^a	33.29±1.81^ab	0.47±0.02^b	4.31±0.23^c
T₃	5.21±0.13^b	34.09±0.58^ab	0.36±0.27^c	5.66±0.49^b
T₄	4.86±0.39^b	36.74±4.94^a	0.55±0.45^a	6.69±0.41^a

化肥减施增施黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥对骏枣生长及品质的影响

Effects of Reducing Fertilizer Application and Increasing Application of Fulvic Acid Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate Water-soluble Formula Fertilizer on the Growth and Quality of Junzao Jujube

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

处理 Treatment	果形指数 Fruit shape index	单果重 Dry weight of single fruit（g）	产量 Yield （kg/667 m²）
CK	1.53±0.09^b	13.57±1.02^b	801.38±9.39^c
T₁	1.73±0.67^a	13.36±0.51^b	756.25±6.77^d
T₂	1.52±0.36^b	13.96±1.14^ab	804.47±21.03^c
T₃	1.54±0.11^b	14.09±2.07^ab	881.24±17.05^b
T₄	1.63±0.08^ab	16.13±0.38^a	910.51±6.21^a

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[3]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[4]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[5]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[6]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[7]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	刘玉芳, 张志刚, 李长城, 李宏, 程平, 杨璐. 不同温度和成熟度对杏贮藏期腐烂率和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197.
[9]	巩多蕊, 杨莉玲, 韩江, 杨忠强, 刘佳, 文钰, 朱占江, 崔宽波. 模拟冷链处理下不同储藏温度对杏果实贮藏期细胞膜脂过氧化及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2198-2207.
[10]	李自芹, 陈雅, 李文绮, 贾文婷, 郭慧静, 宋方圆, 赵志永, 刘成江. 不同预冷方式结合H₂O₂处理对绿糖心冬枣贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215.
[11]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[12]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[13]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[14]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[15]	韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903.