连作障碍消减措施对棉花产量形成和化感自毒作用的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.03.014

新疆农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 509-520.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.03.014

• 棉花化肥农药减施研究 • 上一篇下一篇

连作障碍消减措施对棉花产量形成和化感自毒作用的影响

刘雪花¹, 支金虎¹, 柴朝晖², 王德胜¹, 姚永生¹, 王远¹, 唐梦¹, 宋伞伞¹, 郑森宇¹

1.塔里木大学植物科学学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300;
2.亿利阿拉尔生态科技有限公司,新疆阿拉尔 843300

收稿日期:2018-12-18 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-06-25
通信作者: 支金虎(1978-),男,甘肃张掖人,硕士,教授,研究方向为植物营养土壤健康管理,(E-mail)zjhzky@163.com
作者简介:刘雪花(1981-),硕士研究生,研究方向为植物营养土壤健康管理,(E-mail)xueren5255@qq.com.
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0504303,2017YFD0201900)

Effects of Different Abatement Measures of Continuous Cropping Obstacle on Yield Formation and Allelopathic Autotoxicity of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

LIU Xue-hua¹,ZHI Jin-hu ¹,CHAI Zhao-hui²,WANG De-sheng¹,YAO Yong-sheng¹, WANG Yuan¹,TANG Meng¹,SONG San-san¹,ZHENG Sen-yu¹

1.College of Plant Science, Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300;
2.Yili Aral Ecological Technology Co. LTD,Aral Xinjiang 843300, China

Received:2018-12-18 Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-06-25
Correspondence author: ZHI Jin-hu (1978- ), male, native place: Zhangye, Gansu. Professor, research field: Plant nutrition and soil health management. (E-mail)zjhzky@163.com
Supported by:
Supported by the National Key R & D Programs (2017YFC0504303)and (2017YFD0201900)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究新疆塔里木盆地棉花在不同连作障碍消减措施下的化感自毒效应和评价方式。方法采用田间小区试验,研究不同消减措施对塔里木盆地棉花土壤养分净变化、植株生长、产量、种子发芽的化感自毒效应。结果不同的消减措施对棉花各项指标和化感综合指数有显著差异;CRI处理后土壤中碱解氮净变值最小,CRR处理后土壤速效磷减少量最大,而速效钾则是RIM处理下减少量最大,不论是0~20 cm土层还是20~40 cm土层均是如此; RIM和CM对棉花株高、果枝台数、籽棉产量都具有显著的促进作用,RIM对棉花单铃重具有显著的促进作用,微生物肥料在其中起到了重要的作用;碱解氮的净变值与棉花籽棉产量之间呈负相关关系,而速效磷和速效钾的净变值则与棉花籽棉产量呈负相关关系,其中二次多项式达到显著或极显著水平;将选择的各指标按公式进行RIs计算和比较,发现各消减措施都能表现出一定的化感促进作用,其中以RIM处理(棉花-油菜间作+微生物肥料)下的RIs最大,化感促进作用最强,而不同浸提浓度下则以1:10表现的最佳,RIs均为正值且化感综合指数最大。结论生产中采用棉花-油菜间作+微生物肥料是减轻棉花连作障碍有效和可行的方法。

关键词: 棉花; 连作障碍; 消减措施; 生长; 化感自毒作用

Abstract: Objective To explore the cotton allelopathic autotoxicity effects and evaluation methods under different continuous cropping obstacle abatement measures in Tarim Basin, China.Method The field plot tests were adopted and four measures, continuous cropping with microbial fertilizer (CM), cotton - rape rotation (CRR), cotton-rape intercropping (CRI) and cotton - rape intercropping with microbial fertilizer((RIM), were used in this experiment. Then, some effects of the abatement measures were concluded, and RIs index and evaluation results raised. Result The results showed there were significant differences between different indexes and allelopathic synthetical index under different abatement measures. Both in the 0-20 cm soil layer and the 20-40 cm soil layer, the net change value of alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen in the soil after CRI treatment was the minimum, and the decrease amount of readily available phosphorus in the soil after CRR treatment was the maximum, while the decrease amount of readily available potassium was the maximum under RIM treatment. RIM and CM had significant promoting effects on cotton plant height, number of fruit branches and cotton yield, meanwhile, RIM had significant promoting effects on single boll weight of cotton, among which microbial fertilizer played an important role. The net change of alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen was negatively correlated with seed cotton yield, while the net change of readily available phosphorus and readily available potassium were negatively correlated with seed cotton yield, where the quadratic polynomial reached the significant or extremely significant level. After choosing the indexes according to the formula, RIs was calculated and compared, then it was found that there was a certain degree of allelopathy promoting effect under all the control measures, in which under RIM treatment (cotton-rape intercropping with microbial fertilizer), RIs was the largest and allelopathy promotion was the strongest, while it had the best effect and the largest RIs under the extracting concentration of 1∶10.Conclusion The way of cotton-rape intercropping with microbial fertilizer is an effective and feasible method to reduce the continuous cropping obstacles of cotton.

Key words: cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.); continuous cropping obstacle; abatement measures; growth; allelopathic autotoxicity

中图分类号:

S562S344

刘雪花, 支金虎, 柴朝晖, 王德胜, 姚永生, 王远, 唐梦, 宋伞伞, 郑森宇. 连作障碍消减措施对棉花产量形成和化感自毒作用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3): 509-520.

LIU Xue-hua, ZHI Jin-hu, CHAI Zhao-hui, WANG De-sheng, YAO Yong-sheng, WANG Yuan, TANG Meng, SONG San-san, ZHENG Sen-yu. Effects of Different Abatement Measures of Continuous Cropping Obstacle on Yield Formation and Allelopathic Autotoxicity of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(3): 509-520.

参考文献 32

[1]	中华人民共和国国家统计局数据.http://data.stats.gov.cn/search.htms=2017年新疆棉花 National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China (2017). http://data.stats.gov.cn/search.htms=2017Xinjiang Cotton. (in Chinese)
[2]	王璞,赵秀琴.几种化感物质对棉花种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2001, 6(3): 26-31.WANG Pu, ZHAO Xiu-qin.( 2001). Effect of allelochemicals on cotton seed germination and seedling growth [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 6 (3): 26-31. (in Chinese)
[3]	Jiang G Y, Li Y B, Liu J G. (2013).Autotoxicity potential of cotton tissues and root exudates and identification of its autotoxins. Allelopathy Journal, 32(2):279-288.
[4]	李艳宾,张琴,万传星, 等.棉秆腐解物的化感作用及其主要化学成分分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2009, 21(6): 497-502.LI Yan-bin, ZHANG Qin ,WAN Chuan-xing, et al.(2009). Allelopathy and chemical constituents of decomposing products from cotton stalk [J]. Cotton Science, 21(6): 497-502. (in Chinese)
[5]	Li, Y., Zhang,Q. (2016). Effects of naturally and microbially decomposed cotton stalks on cotton seedling growth. Archives of Agronomy & Soil Science, 62(9):1,264-1,270.
[6]	王曌,刘连涛,孙红春, 等.棉花腐殖质中主要化感物质对棉花幼苗生长发育的影响[J].华北农学报, 2013, 28(S1): 192-195.WANG Zhao,LIU Lian-tao,SUN Hong-chun,et al.(2013). Effect of cotton seeding growth and development by main allelochemicals in cotton humus[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-simica, 28(S1): 192-195. (in Chinese)
[7]	施宠,梁智,徐万里, 等.不同连作年限棉田土壤微生物和酶的特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(1): 163-167. SHI Chong, LIANG Zhi, XU Wan-li, et al.(2010). Effects of cotton cropping cotton soil on microorganism and soil enzyme activity[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 47(1): 163-167. (in Chinese)
[8]	乔清华,张传云,袁哲诚,等.多年连作土壤中棉花根际细菌群落结构及其动态[J]. 棉花学报,2018, 30(2): 128-135.QIAO Qing-hua, ZHANG Chuan-yun, YUAN Zhe-cheng, et al.(2018). Dynamics of cotton rhizosphere bacterial community structure in cotton continuous cropping field soil [J]. Cotton Science, 30(2): 128-135. (in Chinese)
[9]	刘军,唐志敏,刘建国,等.长期连作及秸秆还田对棉田土壤微生物量及种群结构的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(8): 1 418-1 422. LIU Jun, TANG Zhi-min, LIU Jian-guo, et al. (2012). Effects of cotton continuous cropping and returning stalks to soil on the quantities and community structure of soil microbes [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 21(8): 1,418-1,422. (in Chinese)
[10]	Acosta-MartiÌnez, V., Bell, C. W., Morris, B.E.L.,Zak. J., & Allen, V. G. (2010).Long-term soil microbial community and enzyme activity responses to an integrated cropping-livestock system in a semi-arid region. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 137(3):231-240 .
[11]	韩光明,陈全求,张淑芳, 等.生物炭对不同连作年限棉田土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 棉花科学, 2017, 39(5): 7-12. HAN Guang-ming, CHEN Quan-qiu, ZHANG Shu-fang, et al. (2017). Effects of biochar on soil microbial biomass in cotton fields with different continuous cropping years [J]. Cotton Science, 39(5): 7-12 (in Chinese)
[12]	顾美英,唐光木,刘洪亮, 等.施用棉秆炭对新疆连作棉花根际土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 173-181.GU Mei-ying , TANG Guang-mu, LIU Hong-liang, et al.(2016). Effects of cotton stalk biochar on microbial community structure and function of continuous cropping cotton rhizosphere soil in Xinjiang,China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(1): 173-181 .(in Chinese)
[13]	李银平,徐文修,陈冰, 等.绿肥种植模式对连作棉田土壤肥力及棉花产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(9): 149-153.LI Yin-ping, XU Wen-xiu, CHEN Bin, et al. (2010). Effect of different planting patterns of green manureson soil fertility and cotton yield[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 19(9): 149-153 .(in Chinese)
[14]	孙新展.不同种植模式对缓解棉花连作障碍的化感作用机制[D]. 新疆石河子: 石河子大学硕士论文, 2018.SUN Xin-zhan.(2018). Allelopathy mechanism of different cropping patterns on alleviating continuous cropping obstacle of cotton [D]. Master Dissertation. Shihezi University, Shihezi. (in Chinese)
[15]	李彦斌,刘建国,李凤,等.棉花植株水浸提液化感效应的研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,(6):1 489-1 494.LI Yan-bin, LIU Jian-guo, LI Feng, et al.(2008). Allelopathic effect of aqueous extract of cotton[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, (6):1,489-1,494. (in Chinese)
[16]	张国伟. 棉花秸秆浸提液对小麦生长的化感效应[C]∥. 中国作物学会.2014年全国青年作物栽培与生理学术研讨会论文集.中国作物学会:中国作物学会,2014.ZHANG Guo-wei. (2014).Allelopathic effect of cotton straw extract on wheat growth [C]∥. China crop society. Proceedings of 2014 national youth crop cultivation and physiology symposium . China Crop Society. (in Chinese)
[17]	刘跃鹏,席凯鹏,王慧杰, 等.棉花秸秆水浸提液对生菜的化感效应[J]. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(10): 1 643- 1 645.LIU Yue-peng,XI Kai-peng,WANG Hui-jie,et al.(2018). Allelopathy effect of cotton straw extracts on lettuce[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 46(10): 1,643-1,645 .(in Chinese)
[18]	成瑞娜,支金虎,杨利娟,等.棉花化感自毒作用初步研究[J]. 塔里木大学学报, 2010, 22(4): 22-25.CHEN Rui-na, ZHI Jin-hu, YANG Li-juan, et al. (2010). Preliminary study on the allelopathic autotoxicity in cotton [J]. Journal of Tarim University, 22(4): 22-25. (in Chinese)
[19]	张琴,刘占文,李艳宾, 等.核桃叶水浸提液对棉花生长及棉花枯萎病菌的化感效应[J]. 生态科学, 2017, 36(1): 165-169.ZHANG Qin, LIU Zhan-wen, LI Yan-bin, et al.(2017). Allelopathic effect of walnut leaf extracts on cotton and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum [J]. Ecological Science, 36(1): 165-169. (in Chinese)
[20]	孙新展,刘建国,陈华伟, 等.小麦、苜蓿秸秆浸提液对棉花的化感效应[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(1): 69-75.SUN Xin-zhan, LIU Jian-guo, CHEN Hua-wei, et al.(2018). Allelopathic effect of wheat and alfalfa straw aqueous extracts on cotton [J]. Acta agriculturae Boreali-occidentails Sinica, 27(1): 69-75. (in Chinese)
[21]	南京农业大学.土壤农化分析[M].北京:农业出版社,1986. Nanjing Agricultural University. (1986). Soil Agrochemical Analysis [M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press. (in Chinese)
[22]	支金虎,聂云疆,万素梅. 施锌对棉花不同生育期净同化率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(1):94-98.ZHI Jin-hu, NIE Yun-jiang, WAN Su-mei. (2010).Effect of zinc application on net assimilation rate of different cotton growth stages [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Area, 28(1):94-98. (in Chinese)
[23]	薛启,王康才,梁永富,等.藿香不同部位浸提液对其种子萌发及幼苗生长的化感作用[J].南京农业大学学报,2017,40(4):611-617.XUE Qi, WANG Kang-cai, LIANG Yong-fu, et al.(2017). Allelopathy effect of aqueous extracts from different parts of Agastache rugosa on its seed germination and seedling growth [J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 40(4):611-617. (in Chinese)
[24]	Williamson, G. B. , & Richardson, D. (1988). Bioassays for allelopathy: measuring treatment responses with independent controls. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 14(1):181-187.
[25]	韩春丽. 新疆棉花长期连作土壤养分时空变化及可持续利用研究[D]. 新疆石河子:石河子大学硕士论文, 2010. HAN Chun-li.(2010). Temporal and spatial variation of soil nutrients of long-term monoculture cotton field and soil sustainable utilization in Xinjiang [D]. Master Dissertation. Shihezi University, Shihezi. (in Chinese)
[26]	韩春丽,刘梅,张旺锋, 等. 连作棉田土壤剖面钾含量变化特征及对不同耕作方式的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(14): 2 913-2 922. HAN Chun-li, LIU Mei, ZHANG Wang-feng, et al. (2010). The depth variation characteristics of soil potassium in continuous cotton field and its changes with different cultivation practices [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 43(14): 2,913-2,922. (in Chinese)
[27]	李秀玲,吕光辉,何雪芬. 连作年限对土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(9): 93-97.LI Xiu-ling, LÜ Guang-hui, HE Xue-fen. (2012).Study on soil physical-chemical propeties and soil enzyme of cotton cropping field [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 26(9): 93-97. (in Chinese)
[28]	万素梅,杲先民,刘晓红,等. 长期连作对南疆棉田土壤物理性质影响的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(12): 48-53.WAN Su-mei, GAO Xian-min, LIU Xiao-hong, et al.(2012). Hu S L. The influence of the continuous cotton cropping on the physical properties of cotton fieldin different cropping systems in south Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 28(12): 48-53 .(in Chinese)
[29]	张智勇,董秀秀,王绍明, 等. 不同连作障碍消减措施对新疆棉花根系形态生理特征的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019,DOI:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.09002.ZHANG Zhi-yong, DONG Xiu-xiu, WANG Shao-ming, et al.(2019). Influence of different control measures on morphological and physiological characteristics of cotton root in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, Doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.09002. (in Chinese)
[30]	魏飞.不同种植模式对连作棉花生长及土壤微生物的影响[D]. 新疆石河子: 石河子大学硕士论文, 2018.WEI Fei. (2018). Effects of different cropping patterns on the cotton growth and soil microorganism of continuous cropping Cotton [D]. Master Dissertation. Shihezi University, (in Chinese)
[31]	李俊华. 施用微生物有机肥调控棉花黄萎病土壤微生物区系及效应研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学博士论文, 2011.LI Jun-hua. (2011). Application of bio-organic fertilizer to control cotton verticillium wilt by manipulating soil microbial community [D].PhD Dissertation. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing. (in Chinese)
[32]	郎明. 棉花不同生育时期对向日葵列当的化感作用[C]∥. 中国植物保护学会植物化感作用专业委员会.中国第五届植物化感作用学术研讨会论文摘要集.中国植物保护学会植物化感作用专业委员会:中国植物保护学会植物化感作用专业委员会,2011.LANG Ming. (2011). Cotton allelopathy of different growth period to sunflower broomrape [C]∥. Professional committee of the Chinese society of plant protection plant allelopathy. Abstract set of papers of the symposium of the15th China conference on plant allelopathy . Professional Committee of Plant Allelopathy of Chinese Plant Protection Society. (in Chinese)

连作障碍消减措施对棉花产量形成和化感自毒作用的影响

Effects of Different Abatement Measures of Continuous Cropping Obstacle on Yield Formation and Allelopathic Autotoxicity of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[5]	宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247.
[6]	巴音花, 梁龙, 何鹏飞, 李佳莹, 贺鑫, 贺三刚, 李文蓉. 哈萨克羊与特克赛尔羊不同杂交组合后代羔羊早期生长性能的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2331-2340.
[7]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[8]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.
[9]	魏迎凤, 张全成, 查慧, 王小丽, 王俊刚. 二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育和生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021.
[10]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[11]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[12]	王文涛, 吴博, 邰红忠, 练文明, 戴翠荣, 李双江, 蒲艳梅. 新疆阿拉尔垦区不同播期对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422.
[13]	张景灿, 张永强, 雷钧杰, 陈传信, 徐其江, 聂石辉, 徐文修. 不同调节剂对滴灌冬小麦茎秆特征及其抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1067-1074.
[14]	桑志伟, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 陈全家. 不同陆地棉种质资源机采性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098.
[15]	逯涛, 曾庆涛, 张文, 王文博, 王政洋, 杨芮, 孙玉岩. 主成分分析及灰色关联度分析综合评价棉花产量与品质[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109.