不同码垛方式和码垛间隙对甜瓜贮藏特性的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.12.007

新疆农业科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12): 2211-2217.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.12.007

不同码垛方式和码垛间隙对甜瓜贮藏特性的影响

姚军, 耿新丽, 郑贺云, 再吐娜·买买提, 张翠环, 廖新福

新疆维吾尔自治区葡萄瓜果研究所,新疆鄯善 838200

收稿日期:2017-03-26 出版日期:2017-12-25 发布日期:2018-01-29
通信作者: 廖新福(1960-),男,甘肃礼县人,研究员,研究方向为西甜瓜育种与贮藏加工,(E-mail)lxf3838@163.com
作者简介:姚军(1978-),男,四川遂宁人,农艺师,硕士,研究方向为农产品贮藏与加工,(E-mail)yaojun1022@sohu.com
基金资助:
国家西甜瓜产业技术体系项目(CARS-25-10B)

Effects of Different Stacking Methods and Stacking Gaps on Storage Characteristics of Muskmelon

YAO Jun, GENG Xin-li, ZHENG He-yun, Zaituna Maimaiti, ZHANG Cui-huan, LIAO Xin-fu

Research Institute of Grapes and Melons of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Shanshan Xinjiang 838200, China

Received:2017-03-26 Online:2017-12-25 Published:2018-01-29
Correspondence author: LIAO Xin-fu(1960-), male,Lixian,Gansu.researcher, research field: Breeding and storage processing of watermelon and melon. (E-mail)lxf3838@163.com
Supported by:
The National Watermelon and Muskmelon Industry Technology System (CARS-25-10B)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】传统的码垛方式造成甜瓜箱体间空气流通缓慢,降温速度慢,严重影响甜瓜贮藏品质。研究堆码方式对甜瓜贮藏特性的影响,为甜瓜营造均一的贮藏环境势在必行。【方法】以新疆主栽甜瓜品种西州密17号为试材,采用成批堆码的传统码垛方式(间隙为1 cm)和交叉均匀码垛的“井”字形码垛方式进行甜瓜贮藏,研究两种码垛方式,以及“井”字形码垛不同码垛间隙(1、2、3、4 cm)对甜瓜贮藏保鲜特性的影响。【结果】“井”字形码垛方式在减少甜瓜腐烂率、降低失重、延缓果肉变软、减少乙烯释放、抑制呼吸速率等方面均优于传统码垛方式。通过“井”字形码垛不同码垛间隙来看,2~3 cm码垛间隙在腐烂率、果肉硬度、乙烯释放量均优于1和4 cm处理,3 cm码垛间隙在失重率和减少呼吸速率均优于其它处理。【结论】“井”字形码垛方式较适合甜瓜的贮藏与保鲜,同时“井”字形码垛方式2~3 cm的码垛间隙贮藏保鲜效果较好。

关键词: 甜瓜; “井”字形码垛; 码垛间隙; 贮藏特性

Abstract: 【Objective】 The traditional stacking method causes slow airflow and slow cooling rate, which seriously affects the storage quality of melon, so to seek a new way to create a uniform stacking muskmelon storage environment is imperative.【Method】Xizhoumi No.17, the main melon planting variety in Xinjiang was used as experimental material and the traditional way of using batch stacking (gap 1cm) and uniform cross stacking "井" shaped stacking of muskmelon storage were applied to compare the effects of the two methods and different stacking gaps ( 1, 2, 3 and 4 cm ) on the storage characteristics of muskmelon.【Result】The results showed that the "井"zigzag stacking method was superior to traditional stacking method in reducing rotting rate, reducing weight loss, delaying pulp softening, reducing ethylene release and inhibiting respiration rate. Through the "井" zigzag stacking, 2 cm and 3 cm stacking gap in rotting rate, pulp hardness and ethylene were better than 1 cm and 4 cm, the weight loss rate and respiration rate of 3 cm stacking gap were better than other treatments. 【Conclusion】The "井" zigzag stacking method is suitable for the storage and preservation of melon, and the effect of the stacking gap of 2 cm - 3 cm is better.

Key words: muskmelon; "井" zigzag stacking; stacking gap; storage characteristics

中图分类号:

S652
S609

姚军, 耿新丽, 郑贺云, 再吐娜·买买提, 张翠环, 廖新福. 不同码垛方式和码垛间隙对甜瓜贮藏特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(12): 2211-2217.

YAO Jun, GENG Xin-li, ZHENG He-yun, Zaituna Maimaiti, ZHANG Cui-huan, LIAO Xin-fu. Effects of Different Stacking Methods and Stacking Gaps on Storage Characteristics of Muskmelon[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(12): 2211-2217.

参考文献 18

[1]	张润光,王良艳,黄丽婉.甜瓜贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J].保鲜与加工,2011,11(1):36-39.ZHANG Run-guang, WANG Liang-yan, HUANG Li-wan. (2011). Research progress on storage technology of muskmelon [J]. Storage and Process , 11(1):36-39. (in Chinese)
[2]	王文生,董成虎,贾凝.新疆厚皮甜瓜贮藏温度试验[J].保鲜与加工,2006,6(6):21-22.WANG Wen-sheng,DONG Cheng-hu,JIA Ning. (2006). Study of storage temperature of Xinjiang thick-skinned melon 86-1[J].Storage and Process , 6(6):21-22.(in Chinese)
[3]	李萍,车凤斌,胡柏文,等.气调贮藏不同气体比例对哈密瓜86一l贮期品质及生理活性的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(1):104-109.LI Ping,CHE Feng-bin,HU Bai-wen,et al.(2010). Effect of different air condition on the quality and physiological activity of postharvest 86一l melon during storage [J].Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences , 47(1):104-109.(in Chinese)
[4]	王博,李光乐,林茂,等.减压贮藏保鲜技术优点及问题探析[J].广东农业科学,2012,(2):79-82.WANG Bo, LI Guang-le, LIN Mao, et al. (2012). Discussion about the advantages and problems of hypobaric storage [J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences , (2):79-82. (in Chinese)
[5]	祁岩龙,李学文,廖新福,等.响应曲面法研究热水处理对哈密瓜采后品质影响[J].新疆农业科学,2011,48(8):1 451-1 457.QI Yan-long, LI Xue-wen, LIAO Xin-fu, et al. (2011). Effects of response surface method of hot water treatment on quality of post -harvest Hami melon fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences , 48(8):1,451-1,457.(in Chinese)
[6]	Mahmoud, B. S. (2012). Effects of x-ray treatments on pathogenic bacteria, inherent microflora, color, and firmness on whole cantaloupe. International Journal of Food Microbiology , 156(3): 296-300.
[7]	杨卫东,赵敬东,陈存坤.臭氧处理对厚皮甜瓜采后生理及贮藏品质的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2009,30(12):154-156.YANG Wei-dong,ZHAO Jing-dong,CHEN Cun-kun. (2009). Effect of ozone treatment on post-harvest physiology and fruit quality in storage of thick-skinned melon [J].Food Research Development , 30(12):154-156.(in Chinese)
[8]	赵喜亭,周颖媛,邵换娟.果蔬贮藏辐照保鲜技术研究进展[J].北方园艺,2013,(20):169-172.ZHAO Xi-ting, ZHOU Yin-yuan, SHAO Huan-juan. (2013).Advances of irradiated technology in storage and fresh-keeping of fruits and vegetables [J]. Northern Horticulture , (20):169-172. (in Chinese)
[9]	刘铁玲,孙贵宝,曹菁.高压静电场处理番茄贮藏保鲜试验[J].农机化研究,2010,(9):184-186,193.LIU Tie-ling,SUN Gui-bao,CAO Jing.(2010). Study on tomato preservation by high voltage electrostatic field [J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization , (9):184-186,193. (in Chinese)
[10]	Chen, W., Jin, T. Z., Gurtler, J. B., Geveke, D. J., & Fan, X. (2012). Inactivation of salmonella on whole cantaloupe by application of an antimicrobial coating containing chitosan and allyl isothiocyanate. International Journal of Food Microbiology , 155(3): 165-170.
[11]	石火.果蔬冷库干雾控湿保鲜技术问世[J].农产品加工, 2014,(3):76.SHI Huo. (2014). Dry fog and humidity controliing of fruit and vegetable cold storage technology [J]. Farm Products Processing, (3): 76.
[12]	潘俨,李淑荣,张辉,等.运输堆装高度对甜瓜货架期商品率的影响[J].新疆农业科学, 2013,50(11):2 013-2 036.PAN Yan,LI Shu-Rong,ZHANG Hui,et al. (2013).Effect of stacking height of load during transportation on commodity rate of melons in shelf-life [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences , 50(11): 2,013-2,036. (in Chinese)
[13]	王伟峰.番茄差压通风预冷理论分析及实验研究[D]. 济南:山东建筑大学硕士学位论文,2013.WANG Wei-feng. (2013). Theoretical and experimental study on pressure precooling of tomato [D]. Master Thesis. Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinang. (in Chinese)
[14]	]朱志强,张平,高凯.葡萄贮藏保鲜库管理关键技术[J].保鲜与加工,2011,11(6):52-54.ZHU Zhi-qiang, ZHANG Ping, GAO Kai. (2011). Key technologies in management of grape storage house [J]. Storage and Process , 11(6):52-54. (in Chinese)
[15]	高丽朴,王清,左进华.大白菜节能省工贮藏技术[J].中国蔬菜,2013,(17):36-37.GAO Li-pu, WANG Qin, ZUO Jin-hua. (2013). Study storage technology on energy saving and labor saving for large vegetable [J]. China Vegetables ,(17):36-37. (in Chinese)
[16]	朱璇,李娜,王梓怡,等.采前喷施壳聚糖对甜瓜贮藏品质的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2013,34(9):103-106,136.ZHU Xuan, LI Na, WANG Zi-yi, et al. (2013). Effect ofpre-harvest oligochitosan treatment onstorage quality of muskmelon fruits [J]. Food Research Development , 34(9):103-106,136. (in Chinese)
[17]	郭殿卿,冯作山,吴婧婧,等.采后过氧化氢处理对伽师瓜贮藏品质的影响[J].食品科学,2012,33(22):324-327.GUO Dian-qing,FENG Zuo-shan,WU Jing-jing,et al. (2012). Influence of hydrogen peroxide on postharvest quality of Jiashi muskmelon during cold storage [J]. Food Science , 33(22):324-327.(in Chinese)
[18]	李平,辛建华,童军茂,等.外源茉莉酸甲脂和拮抗菌协同贮藏哈密瓜保鲜的研究[J].安徽农学通报,2012,18(21):72-74,145.LI Pin, XING Jian-hua, TONG Jun-mao, et al. (2012).Exogenous jasmonic acid methyl ester and antagonistic bacteria cooperative storage the santa-loupe preservation research [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin ,18(21):72-74,145.(in Chinese)

不同码垛方式和码垛间隙对甜瓜贮藏特性的影响

Effects of Different Stacking Methods and Stacking Gaps on Storage Characteristics of Muskmelon

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郑贺云, 姚军, 李超, 张翠环, 耿新丽. 不同贮藏温度对甜瓜品质的影响及预测模型建立[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1950-1957.
[2]	姚军, 郑贺云, 张翠环, 再吐娜·买买提, 耿新丽. LED持续光照处理对甜瓜贮藏特性及糖代谢的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1689-1697.
[3]	李自芹, 李文绮, 贾文婷, 李宇辉, 刘成江. 氯化钙与1-MCP对西州蜜甜瓜采后贮藏品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1698-1704.
[4]	刘阳, 白羽嘉, 张郑啸, 楚晨俐, 王甜甜, 冯作山. 甜瓜抗链格孢侵染病程相关蛋白及苯丙烷代谢酶的变化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1780-1789.
[5]	贾斌鑫, 杨世英, 王艳, 杨朋朋, 何伟忠, 王成, 刘峰娟, 范盈盈. 不同品种厚皮甜瓜采后糖含量及糖代谢酶活性比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1476-1484.
[6]	田敬宇, 高雁, 高兴旺, 曾军, 赵鹏安, 苏比努尔·居来提. 哈密瓜种植对根际土壤细菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262.
[7]	杨建超, 徐诚, 杨平, 杨鸿基, 张凯浩, 马新超, 高亚宁, 陈有福, 付湘, 轩正英. 氮素指数施肥对设施薄皮甜瓜养分承载及氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 590-600.
[8]	郭阳, 郭俊先, 史勇, 刘丽, 方文艳, 刘彦岑. 特征波长筛选结合PCA-LSSVM对甜瓜叶片SPAD值的预测[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 616-623.
[9]	张浩, 刘熠, 周勃, 黄远, 符小发, 马跃, 吴海波, 胡国智, 毛建才, 陈积豪, 梁其干, 王敏. 氮素运筹对甜瓜芳香物质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2993-3007.
[10]	杨志毅, 王惠林, 王瑞, 王超楠, 徐宝林, 邱火箭. 六种铜制剂对主要甜瓜生长指标、产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3008-3017.
[11]	杨世英, 马玉娥, 贾斌鑫, 华震宇, 沈琦, 刘峰娟, 王成. 油菜素内酯对甜瓜农药残留的降解作用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2541-2550.
[12]	才羿, 戴冬洋, 谭海, 王迪, 杨芬, 王岭, 盛云燕. 甜瓜AMS基因结构分析及基因编辑载体构建[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 61-68.
[13]	熊韬, 闫淼, 王豪杰, 毛建才, 王江涛, 胡国智. 盐碱胁迫对甜瓜种子萌发及幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1965-1974.
[14]	许铭强, 孟伊娜, 张婷, 马燕, 孟新涛, 邹淑萍, 张谦. 厚皮甜瓜脆片压差膨化干燥工艺[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1429-1437.
[15]	王志慧, 霍向东, 李江峰, 翟勇, 李佩琪, 秦新政. 哈密淖毛湖主栽甜瓜病原微生物分离及鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1223-1230.