

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (5): 1139-1150.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.05.011
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Shanshan1(
), WANG Chenyu1, YANG Chaosha2, CAI Xiaoyi1, YIN Weiping1, YIN Qingzhen1(
)
Received:2024-10-11
Online:2025-05-20
Published:2025-07-09
Correspondence author:
YIN Qingzhen
Supported by:
王珊珊1(
), 王晨瑜1, 杨超沙2, 蔡晓艺1, 尹伟平1, 尹庆珍1(
)
通讯作者:
尹庆珍
作者简介:王珊珊(1992-),女,河北衡水人,助理研究员,博士,研究方向为番茄育种,(E-mail) 820705239@qq.com
基金资助:WANG Shanshan, WANG Chenyu, YANG Chaosha, CAI Xiaoyi, YIN Weiping, YIN Qingzhen. Screening of high quality multi-resistance cherry tomato parental resources[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(5): 1139-1150.
王珊珊, 王晨瑜, 杨超沙, 蔡晓艺, 尹伟平, 尹庆珍. 优质多抗樱桃番茄亲本资源筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(5): 1139-1150.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.05.011
| 编号 Number | 品种名称 Species name | 编号 Number | 品种名称 Species name |
|---|---|---|---|
| 519 | 樱桃66 号F2-12-3-1-1 | 570 | 樱桃35号F2-1-1-3-M-2-1 |
| 525 | 1665 F2-8-11-6-1-4-1 | 570-1 | 樱桃51号F2-1-1-1-M-1-1 |
| 526 | 樱桃29 F2-2-10-11-1-5-1 | 571 | 樱桃25号F2-1-11-2-M-1-1 |
| 527 | 樱桃55号F2-11-13-1-1-6-3-1 | 572 | 樱桃64号F2-14-10-3-M-2-1 |
| 528 | 樱桃55号F2-11-34-2-1-7-1-1 | 573 | 樱桃51号F2-2-8-3-1 |
| 529 | 樱桃52号F2-3-1-2-5-8-1 | 574 | 樱桃56号F2-1-1-M-11-M-M-2-1 |
| 530 | 樱桃26号F2-2-5-2-4-2-1 | 575 | 樱桃28号218 F2-8-1-M-2-1 |
| 531 | 樱桃26号F2-4-20-3-4-2-1 | 577 | 樱桃20号F2-12-1-M-3 -1 |
| 532 | 樱桃25号F2-1-8-2-4-1-1 | 579 | 樱桃15号F2-2-2-M-1-1 |
| 534 | 樱桃20号F2-12-2-7-5-1 | 580 | 樱桃51号F2-1-1-1-M-1-1 |
| 536 | 樱桃34号F2-24-3-5-3-1 | 582 | 樱桃3318 F2-3-1-3-M-2-1 |
| 537 | 樱桃51号F2-1-1-2-6-1-1-1 | 583 | 樱桃3318 F2-3-1-3-M-1-1 |
| 538 | 樱桃29号F2-1-11-1-5-2-1 | 585 | 樱桃64号F2-14-6-2-1-3-2 -1 |
| 539 | 樱桃28号218 F2-8-2-1-2-1 | 586 | 樱桃64号F2-14-6-2-1-2-3-1 |
| 540 | 樱桃4号F2-1-1-1-1-1 | 587 | 樱桃132 F2-2-1-1-1-1 |
| 557 | 樱桃33号F2-21-27-1-2-M-1-1 | 589 | 樱桃132 F2-2-1-3-3-1 |
| 560 | 樱桃55号F2-16-15-3-3-7-1-1 | 590 | 樱桃39号 F2-5-1-1-1 |
| 561 | 樱桃55号F2-11-13-1-1-6-1-1 | 594 | 樱桃12号F2-1-2-7-3-1 |
| 563 | 樱桃66号F2-12-3-6-1 | 596 | 樱桃12号F2-1-2-4-5-1 |
| 564 | 段樱1号F2-2-2-2-2-M-M-1 | 599 | 樱桃33号F2-21-27-1-3-1-2-1 |
| 565 | 樱桃3318 F2-3-1-3-M-3-1 | 601 | 樱桃17号F2-1-3-1-1 |
Tab.1 Number and source of cherry tomato variety materials germplasm resources
| 编号 Number | 品种名称 Species name | 编号 Number | 品种名称 Species name |
|---|---|---|---|
| 519 | 樱桃66 号F2-12-3-1-1 | 570 | 樱桃35号F2-1-1-3-M-2-1 |
| 525 | 1665 F2-8-11-6-1-4-1 | 570-1 | 樱桃51号F2-1-1-1-M-1-1 |
| 526 | 樱桃29 F2-2-10-11-1-5-1 | 571 | 樱桃25号F2-1-11-2-M-1-1 |
| 527 | 樱桃55号F2-11-13-1-1-6-3-1 | 572 | 樱桃64号F2-14-10-3-M-2-1 |
| 528 | 樱桃55号F2-11-34-2-1-7-1-1 | 573 | 樱桃51号F2-2-8-3-1 |
| 529 | 樱桃52号F2-3-1-2-5-8-1 | 574 | 樱桃56号F2-1-1-M-11-M-M-2-1 |
| 530 | 樱桃26号F2-2-5-2-4-2-1 | 575 | 樱桃28号218 F2-8-1-M-2-1 |
| 531 | 樱桃26号F2-4-20-3-4-2-1 | 577 | 樱桃20号F2-12-1-M-3 -1 |
| 532 | 樱桃25号F2-1-8-2-4-1-1 | 579 | 樱桃15号F2-2-2-M-1-1 |
| 534 | 樱桃20号F2-12-2-7-5-1 | 580 | 樱桃51号F2-1-1-1-M-1-1 |
| 536 | 樱桃34号F2-24-3-5-3-1 | 582 | 樱桃3318 F2-3-1-3-M-2-1 |
| 537 | 樱桃51号F2-1-1-2-6-1-1-1 | 583 | 樱桃3318 F2-3-1-3-M-1-1 |
| 538 | 樱桃29号F2-1-11-1-5-2-1 | 585 | 樱桃64号F2-14-6-2-1-3-2 -1 |
| 539 | 樱桃28号218 F2-8-2-1-2-1 | 586 | 樱桃64号F2-14-6-2-1-2-3-1 |
| 540 | 樱桃4号F2-1-1-1-1-1 | 587 | 樱桃132 F2-2-1-1-1-1 |
| 557 | 樱桃33号F2-21-27-1-2-M-1-1 | 589 | 樱桃132 F2-2-1-3-3-1 |
| 560 | 樱桃55号F2-16-15-3-3-7-1-1 | 590 | 樱桃39号 F2-5-1-1-1 |
| 561 | 樱桃55号F2-11-13-1-1-6-1-1 | 594 | 樱桃12号F2-1-2-7-3-1 |
| 563 | 樱桃66号F2-12-3-6-1 | 596 | 樱桃12号F2-1-2-4-5-1 |
| 564 | 段樱1号F2-2-2-2-2-M-M-1 | 599 | 樱桃33号F2-21-27-1-3-1-2-1 |
| 565 | 樱桃3318 F2-3-1-3-M-3-1 | 601 | 樱桃17号F2-1-3-1-1 |
| 变量 Variables | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 极差 Range | 变异系数 Variable (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 果实横径Fruit diameter | 2.54 | 3.42 | 3.01 | 0.23 | 0.88 | 7.79 |
| 果实纵径Fruit longitudinal diameter | 2.63 | 5.12 | 3.62 | 0.54 | 2.49 | 14.92 |
| 果肉厚Thick flesh | 0.2 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 21.01 |
| 单果重Single fruit weight | 10.06 | 23.87 | 15.69 | 3.36 | 13.81 | 21.39 |
| 可溶性固形物含量Soluble solid content | 6.81 | 11.12 | 8.91 | 1.11 | 4.31 | 12.50 |
| 总酸含量Total acid content | 0.63 | 1.29 | 1.01 | 0.21 | 0.66 | 20.51 |
| 固酸比Solid acid rafio | 5.77 | 15.23 | 9.29 | 2.48 | 9.46 | 26.75 |
| 可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content | 8.26 | 31.55 | 17.92 | 5.85 | 23.29 | 32.62 |
| 果糖含量Fructose conteat | 6.28 | 16.56 | 12.13 | 2.47 | 10.28 | 20.32 |
| 蔗糖含量Sucrose content | 0.6 | 4.4 | 2.18 | 0.94 | 3.8 | 43.06 |
| 苹果酸含量Malic acid content | 0.01 | 1.33 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 1.32 | 76.82 |
| VC含量 VC content | 12.88 | 206.06 | 114.59 | 43.67 | 193.18 | 38.11 |
Tab.2 Character data statistics of cherry tomatoes
| 变量 Variables | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 极差 Range | 变异系数 Variable (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 果实横径Fruit diameter | 2.54 | 3.42 | 3.01 | 0.23 | 0.88 | 7.79 |
| 果实纵径Fruit longitudinal diameter | 2.63 | 5.12 | 3.62 | 0.54 | 2.49 | 14.92 |
| 果肉厚Thick flesh | 0.2 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 21.01 |
| 单果重Single fruit weight | 10.06 | 23.87 | 15.69 | 3.36 | 13.81 | 21.39 |
| 可溶性固形物含量Soluble solid content | 6.81 | 11.12 | 8.91 | 1.11 | 4.31 | 12.50 |
| 总酸含量Total acid content | 0.63 | 1.29 | 1.01 | 0.21 | 0.66 | 20.51 |
| 固酸比Solid acid rafio | 5.77 | 15.23 | 9.29 | 2.48 | 9.46 | 26.75 |
| 可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content | 8.26 | 31.55 | 17.92 | 5.85 | 23.29 | 32.62 |
| 果糖含量Fructose conteat | 6.28 | 16.56 | 12.13 | 2.47 | 10.28 | 20.32 |
| 蔗糖含量Sucrose content | 0.6 | 4.4 | 2.18 | 0.94 | 3.8 | 43.06 |
| 苹果酸含量Malic acid content | 0.01 | 1.33 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 1.32 | 76.82 |
| VC含量 VC content | 12.88 | 206.06 | 114.59 | 43.67 | 193.18 | 38.11 |
| 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalues | 方差贡献率 Contribution rates(%) | 累积方差贡献率 Cumulative contribution rates(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.237 | 18.639 | 18.639 |
| 2 | 2.106 | 17.547 | 36.186 |
| 3 | 1.653 | 13.778 | 49.964 |
| 4 | 1.57 | 13.087 | 63.052 |
| 5 | 1.181 | 9.842 | 72.893 |
Tab.3 Eigenvaluescontribution rates and cumulative contribution rates of the five principal components analysis
| 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalues | 方差贡献率 Contribution rates(%) | 累积方差贡献率 Cumulative contribution rates(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.237 | 18.639 | 18.639 |
| 2 | 2.106 | 17.547 | 36.186 |
| 3 | 1.653 | 13.778 | 49.964 |
| 4 | 1.57 | 13.087 | 63.052 |
| 5 | 1.181 | 9.842 | 72.893 |
| 变量 Variables | 因子 Factors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 果实横径Fruit diameter | -0.275 | -0.06 | 0.122 | 0.681 | -0.132 |
| 果实纵径Fruit longitudinal diameter | -0.228 | -0.064 | 0.597 | -0.558 | 0.015 |
| 果肉厚Thick flesh | -0.079 | -0.415 | 0.613 | 0.204 | 0.181 |
| 单果重Single fruit weight | -0.132 | -0.592 | 0.267 | 0.526 | 0.135 |
| 可溶性固形物含量Soluble solid content | 0.566 | -0.15 | -0.11 | 0.121 | 0.586 |
| 总酸含量Total acid content | -0.66 | 0.521 | 0.089 | 0.177 | 0.384 |
| 固酸比Solid acid rafio | 0.834 | -0.493 | -0.13 | -0.096 | -0.038 |
| 可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content | 0.506 | 0.522 | 0.221 | 0.272 | -0.069 |
| 蔗糖含量Sucrose content | 0.176 | 0.393 | -0.389 | 0.52 | -0.012 |
| 果糖含量Fructose conteat | 0.2 | 0.385 | 0.112 | -0.164 | 0.714 |
| 苹果酸含量Malic acid content | -0.432 | -0.129 | -0.678 | -0.217 | 0.112 |
| VC含量 VC content | 0.346 | 0.669 | 0.356 | -0.048 | -0.302 |
Tab.4 Loading matrix in different factors of variables
| 变量 Variables | 因子 Factors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 果实横径Fruit diameter | -0.275 | -0.06 | 0.122 | 0.681 | -0.132 |
| 果实纵径Fruit longitudinal diameter | -0.228 | -0.064 | 0.597 | -0.558 | 0.015 |
| 果肉厚Thick flesh | -0.079 | -0.415 | 0.613 | 0.204 | 0.181 |
| 单果重Single fruit weight | -0.132 | -0.592 | 0.267 | 0.526 | 0.135 |
| 可溶性固形物含量Soluble solid content | 0.566 | -0.15 | -0.11 | 0.121 | 0.586 |
| 总酸含量Total acid content | -0.66 | 0.521 | 0.089 | 0.177 | 0.384 |
| 固酸比Solid acid rafio | 0.834 | -0.493 | -0.13 | -0.096 | -0.038 |
| 可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content | 0.506 | 0.522 | 0.221 | 0.272 | -0.069 |
| 蔗糖含量Sucrose content | 0.176 | 0.393 | -0.389 | 0.52 | -0.012 |
| 果糖含量Fructose conteat | 0.2 | 0.385 | 0.112 | -0.164 | 0.714 |
| 苹果酸含量Malic acid content | -0.432 | -0.129 | -0.678 | -0.217 | 0.112 |
| VC含量 VC content | 0.346 | 0.669 | 0.356 | -0.048 | -0.302 |
| 编号 Number | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | 总得分 Total score | 排序 Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 519 | -1.201 7 | -0.262 3 | -2.565 3 | -0.788 9 | 0.414 6 | -0.685 9 | 40 |
| 525 | -2.284 2 | -1.785 3 | 0.736 6 | -0.127 3 | -0.880 3 | -0.740 8 | 41 |
| 526 | -0.505 3 | -1.162 8 | -1.675 8 | -1.079 2 | -0.789 9 | -0.748 1 | 42 |
| 527 | 0.686 5 | -1.466 9 | 0.182 4 | -0.461 3 | 1.219 2 | -0.044 7 | 27 |
| 528 | -0.194 3 | -0.145 3 | 0.020 6 | -0.284 3 | 1.439 9 | 0.045 6 | 23 |
| 529 | 1.279 1 | -1.024 7 | -0.035 2 | -0.485 5 | 1.081 4 | 0.096 6 | 19 |
| 530 | -0.948 7 | -0.423 2 | 0.600 2 | -0.396 2 | 0.579 1 | -0.163 3 | 30 |
| 531 | 0.701 7 | -1.213 6 | 0.752 8 | 1.190 0 | -1.510 3 | 0.028 6 | 24 |
| 532 | -0.413 4 | -2.069 0 | 1.257 8 | 1.089 5 | 1.518 9 | 0.025 3 | 25 |
| 534 | -0.982 2 | -1.012 2 | 1.506 9 | 0.942 7 | 1.485 9 | 0.116 6 | 17 |
| 536 | -1.310 7 | 0.565 4 | -1.379 4 | 0.523 6 | -0.371 3 | -0.303 2 | 34 |
| 537 | 0.657 7 | -1.537 7 | -0.014 5 | -1.097 1 | -0.736 8 | -0.365 3 | 36 |
| 538 | -0.590 2 | -1.531 1 | 0.126 6 | 0.977 9 | -1.486 4 | -0.379 6 | 37 |
| 539 | -0.756 4 | 0.102 3 | -1.311 0 | -0.635 3 | 1.111 5 | -0.277 4 | 33 |
| 540 | 0.337 9 | -0.466 1 | 0.335 3 | -2.755 7 | -1.155 5 | -0.447 0 | 38 |
| 557 | 0.346 8 | -0.433 5 | -0.916 0 | 1.050 0 | 0.924 7 | 0.090 8 | 20 |
| 560 | -1.045 7 | 0.318 6 | 0.925 9 | -1.192 4 | 0.846 7 | -0.084 2 | 28 |
| 561 | -0.312 6 | 1.556 2 | -0.354 7 | -0.988 9 | 1.485 2 | 0.182 7 | 13 |
| 563 | -0.229 1 | -0.877 6 | -1.127 2 | -0.790 0 | -0.183 2 | -0.473 4 | 39 |
| 564 | -1.554 3 | 0.921 9 | -1.722 2 | 0.531 1 | -0.477 6 | -0.342 7 | 35 |
| 565 | -0.592 0 | -0.387 0 | -1.577 7 | 0.950 2 | 0.615 7 | -0.210 7 | 32 |
| 570 | 0.226 3 | 1.305 0 | 1.281 6 | -1.503 8 | -1.179 2 | 0.134 9 | 16 |
| 570-1 | 1.471 6 | 0.349 8 | -0.009 2 | 1.067 3 | -1.480 3 | 0.328 4 | 5 |
| 571 | -0.665 9 | 0.782 9 | 0.615 0 | 2.064 9 | -1.086 5 | 0.261 3 | 10 |
| 572 | 0.094 7 | 1.924 0 | -0.600 8 | 0.333 9 | -0.266 8 | 0.289 9 | 8 |
| 573 | -0.317 8 | 1.106 8 | -0.478 4 | 0.782 0 | 0.513 0 | 0.221 9 | 12 |
| 574 | 0.792 0 | 0.193 6 | -0.054 6 | -0.469 2 | 0.029 5 | 0.115 6 | 18 |
| 575 | -0.517 0 | 1.561 6 | 1.618 3 | -0.951 3 | -0.078 6 | 0.268 4 | 9 |
| 577 | -0.496 3 | 0.858 5 | 1.124 7 | 0.360 6 | 0.423 8 | 0.302 0 | 6 |
| 579 | 0.122 3 | -0.271 1 | 1.135 3 | -0.575 6 | 0.220 8 | 0.078 0 | 21 |
| 580 | 1.126 9 | 1.079 0 | 0.423 5 | 0.013 5 | 0.123 2 | 0.471 6 | 4 |
| 582 | 0.792 8 | 0.531 7 | 0.199 7 | 0.568 5 | -0.444 3 | 0.299 2 | 7 |
| 583 | -1.063 3 | 0.641 9 | 0.954 0 | -0.301 6 | -1.398 0 | -0.131 2 | 29 |
| 585 | -0.361 1 | 0.279 5 | 0.350 1 | 0.897 3 | -0.784 4 | 0.070 2 | 22 |
| 586 | 0.501 5 | -0.555 6 | -0.705 1 | 0.456 9 | -1.623 6 | -0.201 2 | 31 |
| 587 | 1.481 5 | 0.015 5 | -0.613 2 | -0.580 2 | 0.201 2 | 0.138 2 | 15 |
| 589 | 1.313 9 | 0.406 8 | -0.094 0 | -0.982 4 | 0.010 6 | 0.175 8 | 14 |
| 590 | 1.732 0 | -0.347 3 | -0.117 2 | 0.769 0 | -0.868 1 | 0.260 9 | 11 |
| 594 | -0.523 5 | 0.700 0 | 0.975 4 | -0.794 3 | -0.654 5 | -0.008 7 | 26 |
| 596 | 0.270 6 | 0.533 6 | 1.065 3 | 0.465 3 | 1.917 2 | 0.540 4 | 2 |
| 599 | 0.444 3 | 1.403 6 | -0.426 3 | 1.769 1 | 0.596 0 | 0.560 5 | 1 |
| 601 | 2.486 0 | -0.165 8 | -0.410 1 | 0.437 0 | 0.697 8 | 0.503 6 | 3 |
Tab.5 Principal component score and quality score of cherry tomatoes
| 编号 Number | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | 总得分 Total score | 排序 Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 519 | -1.201 7 | -0.262 3 | -2.565 3 | -0.788 9 | 0.414 6 | -0.685 9 | 40 |
| 525 | -2.284 2 | -1.785 3 | 0.736 6 | -0.127 3 | -0.880 3 | -0.740 8 | 41 |
| 526 | -0.505 3 | -1.162 8 | -1.675 8 | -1.079 2 | -0.789 9 | -0.748 1 | 42 |
| 527 | 0.686 5 | -1.466 9 | 0.182 4 | -0.461 3 | 1.219 2 | -0.044 7 | 27 |
| 528 | -0.194 3 | -0.145 3 | 0.020 6 | -0.284 3 | 1.439 9 | 0.045 6 | 23 |
| 529 | 1.279 1 | -1.024 7 | -0.035 2 | -0.485 5 | 1.081 4 | 0.096 6 | 19 |
| 530 | -0.948 7 | -0.423 2 | 0.600 2 | -0.396 2 | 0.579 1 | -0.163 3 | 30 |
| 531 | 0.701 7 | -1.213 6 | 0.752 8 | 1.190 0 | -1.510 3 | 0.028 6 | 24 |
| 532 | -0.413 4 | -2.069 0 | 1.257 8 | 1.089 5 | 1.518 9 | 0.025 3 | 25 |
| 534 | -0.982 2 | -1.012 2 | 1.506 9 | 0.942 7 | 1.485 9 | 0.116 6 | 17 |
| 536 | -1.310 7 | 0.565 4 | -1.379 4 | 0.523 6 | -0.371 3 | -0.303 2 | 34 |
| 537 | 0.657 7 | -1.537 7 | -0.014 5 | -1.097 1 | -0.736 8 | -0.365 3 | 36 |
| 538 | -0.590 2 | -1.531 1 | 0.126 6 | 0.977 9 | -1.486 4 | -0.379 6 | 37 |
| 539 | -0.756 4 | 0.102 3 | -1.311 0 | -0.635 3 | 1.111 5 | -0.277 4 | 33 |
| 540 | 0.337 9 | -0.466 1 | 0.335 3 | -2.755 7 | -1.155 5 | -0.447 0 | 38 |
| 557 | 0.346 8 | -0.433 5 | -0.916 0 | 1.050 0 | 0.924 7 | 0.090 8 | 20 |
| 560 | -1.045 7 | 0.318 6 | 0.925 9 | -1.192 4 | 0.846 7 | -0.084 2 | 28 |
| 561 | -0.312 6 | 1.556 2 | -0.354 7 | -0.988 9 | 1.485 2 | 0.182 7 | 13 |
| 563 | -0.229 1 | -0.877 6 | -1.127 2 | -0.790 0 | -0.183 2 | -0.473 4 | 39 |
| 564 | -1.554 3 | 0.921 9 | -1.722 2 | 0.531 1 | -0.477 6 | -0.342 7 | 35 |
| 565 | -0.592 0 | -0.387 0 | -1.577 7 | 0.950 2 | 0.615 7 | -0.210 7 | 32 |
| 570 | 0.226 3 | 1.305 0 | 1.281 6 | -1.503 8 | -1.179 2 | 0.134 9 | 16 |
| 570-1 | 1.471 6 | 0.349 8 | -0.009 2 | 1.067 3 | -1.480 3 | 0.328 4 | 5 |
| 571 | -0.665 9 | 0.782 9 | 0.615 0 | 2.064 9 | -1.086 5 | 0.261 3 | 10 |
| 572 | 0.094 7 | 1.924 0 | -0.600 8 | 0.333 9 | -0.266 8 | 0.289 9 | 8 |
| 573 | -0.317 8 | 1.106 8 | -0.478 4 | 0.782 0 | 0.513 0 | 0.221 9 | 12 |
| 574 | 0.792 0 | 0.193 6 | -0.054 6 | -0.469 2 | 0.029 5 | 0.115 6 | 18 |
| 575 | -0.517 0 | 1.561 6 | 1.618 3 | -0.951 3 | -0.078 6 | 0.268 4 | 9 |
| 577 | -0.496 3 | 0.858 5 | 1.124 7 | 0.360 6 | 0.423 8 | 0.302 0 | 6 |
| 579 | 0.122 3 | -0.271 1 | 1.135 3 | -0.575 6 | 0.220 8 | 0.078 0 | 21 |
| 580 | 1.126 9 | 1.079 0 | 0.423 5 | 0.013 5 | 0.123 2 | 0.471 6 | 4 |
| 582 | 0.792 8 | 0.531 7 | 0.199 7 | 0.568 5 | -0.444 3 | 0.299 2 | 7 |
| 583 | -1.063 3 | 0.641 9 | 0.954 0 | -0.301 6 | -1.398 0 | -0.131 2 | 29 |
| 585 | -0.361 1 | 0.279 5 | 0.350 1 | 0.897 3 | -0.784 4 | 0.070 2 | 22 |
| 586 | 0.501 5 | -0.555 6 | -0.705 1 | 0.456 9 | -1.623 6 | -0.201 2 | 31 |
| 587 | 1.481 5 | 0.015 5 | -0.613 2 | -0.580 2 | 0.201 2 | 0.138 2 | 15 |
| 589 | 1.313 9 | 0.406 8 | -0.094 0 | -0.982 4 | 0.010 6 | 0.175 8 | 14 |
| 590 | 1.732 0 | -0.347 3 | -0.117 2 | 0.769 0 | -0.868 1 | 0.260 9 | 11 |
| 594 | -0.523 5 | 0.700 0 | 0.975 4 | -0.794 3 | -0.654 5 | -0.008 7 | 26 |
| 596 | 0.270 6 | 0.533 6 | 1.065 3 | 0.465 3 | 1.917 2 | 0.540 4 | 2 |
| 599 | 0.444 3 | 1.403 6 | -0.426 3 | 1.769 1 | 0.596 0 | 0.560 5 | 1 |
| 601 | 2.486 0 | -0.165 8 | -0.410 1 | 0.437 0 | 0.697 8 | 0.503 6 | 3 |
| 编号 Number | Ty-1 | Ty-2 | Frl | Cf-5 | Cf-9 | Mi1.2 | Mi2.3 | Ph-3 | Sm | Sw-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 525 | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 526 | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 527 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 528 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 529 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 530 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 531 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 532 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 534 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 536 | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 |
| 537 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 538 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 539 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 540 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 557 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 560 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 561 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 519 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 563 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 564 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 565 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 570 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - |
| 571 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 572 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 573 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 574 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 |
| 575 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 577 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 579 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 580 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 582 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 583 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 570-1 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 585 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 586 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 587 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 589 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 590 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 594 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - |
| 596 | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - |
| 599 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 601 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
Tab.6 Statistics of resistance genes in cherry tomato germplasm resources
| 编号 Number | Ty-1 | Ty-2 | Frl | Cf-5 | Cf-9 | Mi1.2 | Mi2.3 | Ph-3 | Sm | Sw-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 525 | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 526 | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 527 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 528 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 529 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 530 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 531 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 532 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 534 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 536 | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 |
| 537 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 538 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 539 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 540 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 557 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 560 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 561 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 519 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 563 | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 564 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 565 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 570 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - |
| 571 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 572 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 573 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 574 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 |
| 575 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 577 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 579 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 580 | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 582 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 583 | - | - | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - |
| 570-1 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 585 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 586 | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 587 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 589 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 590 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - |
| 594 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - |
| 596 | - | - | 抗 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - |
| 599 | 抗 | - | - | - | - | 抗 | - | 抗 | - | - |
| 601 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - | - | 抗 | - | - |
Fig.1 Detection results of tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease gene Ty-1 /Ty-2 Note: The green dot in the figure indicates the absence red dot indicates the presence of heter-ozygous resistance genes, the blue dot indicates the presence of homozygous resistance gray dot indicates the inability to the black dot indicates the negative control,the same as below
| [1] | 葛芙蓉, 郭焕茹, 范雪莲, 等. 宁波地区樱桃番茄高产优质栽培技术及优势品种推荐[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2022,(17):12-15. |
| GE Furong, GUO Huanru, FAN Xuelian, et al. Cultivation techniques of cherry tomato with high yield and high quality and recommendation of dominant varieties in Ningbo[J]. Yangtze River Vegetables, 2022,(17):12-15. | |
| [2] | 王珊珊, 杨超沙, 尹伟平, 等. 多抗优质樱桃番茄资源鉴定及筛选[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(8):121-130. |
| WANG Shanshan, YANG Chaosha, YIN Weiping, et al. Identification and screening of high quality cherry tomato with multiple resistance[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022, 27(8):121-130. | |
| [3] | 宋建军, 刘红宵, 仇燕, 等. 番茄黄化曲叶病毒病的发生分布及防治对策[J]. 北方园艺, 2010,(7):147-150. |
| SONG Jianjun, LIU Hongxiao, QIU Yan, et al. Occurrence, distribution and control measures of tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010,(7):147-150. | |
| [4] | Caro M, Verlaan M G, Julián O, et al. Assessing the genetic variation of Ty-1 and Ty-3 alleles conferring resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus in a broad tomato germplasm[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2015, 35(6). |
| [5] |
Yamaguchi H, Ohnishi J, Saito A, et al. An NB-LRR gene, TYNBS1, is responsible for resistance mediated by the Ty-2 Begomovirus resistance locus of tomato[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2018, 131(6):1345-1362.
DOI PMID |
| [6] | SUN W, ZHAO W, WANG Y, et al. Natural Variation of Pto and Fen Genes and Marker-Assisted Selection for Resistance to Bacterial Speck in Tomato[J]. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2011, 10(6):827-837. |
| [7] | Mehrach K, Gharsallah Chouchane S, Mejia L, et al. PCR-Based Methods for Tagging the Mi-1 Locus for Resistance to Root- Knot Nematode in Begomovirus-Resistant Tomato Germplasm[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2005,(695):263-270. |
| [8] | Staniaszek M, Szczechura W, Marczewski W. Identification of a New Molecular Marker C2-25 Linked to the Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici Resistance Frl Gene in Tomato[J]. Czech Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding, 2014, 50(4):285-287. |
| [9] | 张育垚, 李景富, 谢立波. 番茄Cf-5基因的SNP分子标记开发[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2012, 43(4):93-98. |
| ZHANG Yuyao, LI Jingfu, XIE Libo, et al. Development of SNP molecular markers for Cf-5 gene in tomato[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2012, 43(4):93-98. | |
| [10] | Kim B, Hwang I S, Lee H, et al. Combination of newly developed SNP and InDel markers for genotyping the Cf-9 locus conferring disease resistance to leaf mold disease in the tomato[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2017, 37(5). |
| [11] | Yang H, Zhao T, Jiang J, et al. Mapping and screening of the tomato Stemphylium lycopersici resistance gene, Sm, based on bulked segregant analysis in combination with genome resequencing[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2017, 17(1):1-10. |
| [12] | Jung J, Kim H J, Lee J M, et al. Gene-based molecular marker system for multiple disease resistances in tomato against Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, late blight, and verticillium wilt[J]. Euphytica, 2015, 205(2):599-613. |
| [13] | 苏晓梅, 高建昌, 王孝宣, 等. 番茄抗病基因Tm-2、Pto、Sw-5和Ve1的SNP标记检测[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(10):2012-2020. |
| SU Xiaomei, GAO Jianchang, WANG Xiaoxuan, et al. Detection of SNP markers of tomato resistance genes Tm-2, Pto, Sw-5 and Ve1[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2014, 41(10):2012-2020. | |
| [14] |
陈莉菁, 刘子记, 谢尚潜, 等. 5个抗病基因功能标记在234份番茄材料中的检测[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(6):1685-1693.
DOI |
| CHEN Lijing, LIU Ziqi, XIE Shangqian, et al. Detection of 5 functional markers of disease resistance genes in 234 tomato materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 42(6):1685-1693. | |
| [15] | 杨超沙, 王珊珊, 尹伟平, 等. 八十一份番茄种质资源的六种病害抗病基因检测[J]. 北方园艺, 2022, 2022(20):1-9. |
| YANG Chaosha, WANG Shanshan, YIN Weiping, et al. Detection of six disease resistance genes in 81 tomato germplasm resources[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022, 2022(20):1-9. | |
| [16] | 袁东升, 王晓敏, 赵宇飞, 等. 100份番茄种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(4):594-601. |
| YUAN Dongsheng, WANG Xiaomin, ZHAO Yufei, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in 100 tomato germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(4):594-601. | |
| [17] | 谢雪果, 于冬冬, 彭晓云, 等. 28份樱桃番茄引进品种农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 广东农业科学, 2023, 50(10):120-129. |
| XIE Xuego, YU Dongdong, PENG Xiaoyun, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity of agronomic traits of 28 imported varieties of cherry tomato[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 50(10):120-129. | |
| [18] |
李艳红, 聂俊, 郑锦荣, 等. 华南地区樱桃番茄表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(9):1717-1730.
DOI |
| LI Yanhong, NIE Jun, ZHENG Jinrong, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of cherry tomato phenotypic traits in South China[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 48(9):1717-1730. | |
| [19] | 刘珮君, 王晓敏, 李国花, 等. 166份番茄种质资源的综合评价[J]. 云南大学学报. 自然科学版, 2020, 42(4):792-803. |
| LIU Peijun, WANG Xiaomin, LI Guohua, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of 166 tomato cultivars[J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Science Ed.), 2019, 42(4):792-803. | |
| [20] | 陈金香, 王艳娣, 梁健文, 等. 华南连栋温室基质袋培模式下6个樱桃番茄品种的综合鉴评[J]. 广东农业科学, 2023, 50(9):142-154. |
| CHEN Jinxiang, WANG Yandi, LIANG Jianwen, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of 6 cherry tomato varieties under the matrix bag culture model in multi-greenhouse in South China[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 50(9):142-154. | |
| [21] | 赵云霞, 颜秀娟, 王学梅, 等. 基于主成分与分子标记鉴定的樱桃番茄新组合综合评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(18):51-54. |
| ZHAO Yunxia, YAN Xiujuan, WANG Xuemei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of new combinations of cherry tomato based on principal component and molecular marker identification[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(18):51-54. | |
| [22] | 王小娟, 陈健晓, 李雪峤, 等. 13份矮生番茄种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(6):1955-1964. |
| WANG Xiaojuan, CHEN Jianxiao, LI Xueqiao, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in 13 dwarf tomato germplasm resources[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2002, 20(6):1955-1964. | |
| [23] | 李永清, 邱胤晖, 曾绍贵. 27份加工型番茄种质资源的聚类分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(3):56-58. |
| LI Yongqing, QIU Yinhui, ZENG Shaogui. Cluster analysis of germplasm resources of 27 processed tomato cultivars[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 50(3):56-58. | |
| [24] | 李丽梅, 杨超沙, 张立永, 等. 优质番茄种质资源品质分析及综合评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2020,35((增刊)):85-92. |
| LI Limei, YANG Chaosha, ZHANG Liyong, et al. Quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of high quality tomato germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 35(suppl.):85-92. | |
| [25] | 李锡香, 杜永臣. 番茄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2006:58-66. |
| LI Xixiang, DU Yongchen. Description and Data Standard of Tomato Germplasm Resources[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006:58-66. | |
| [26] | 张静, 常培培, 梁燕, 等. 樱桃番茄主要品质性状的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2014,(21):1-7. |
| ZHANG Jing, CHANG Peipei, LIANG Yan, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of Main quality characters of cherry tomato[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2014,(21):1-7. | |
| [27] | 王思思, 钟葵, 史波林, 等. 基于多元统计分析的不同产地红花椒挥发性成分差异分析[J]. 中国调味品, 2019, 44(3):51-56. |
| WANG Sisi, ZHONG Kui, SHI Bolin, et al. Analysis of volatile components of Zanthoxylum from different producing areas based on multivariate statistical analysis[J]. Chinese Condiments, 2019, 44(3):51-56. |
| [1] | LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comprehensive evaluation of low temperature tolerance of different varieties of spring wheat seeds during germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 820-828. |
| [2] | HAO Xiyu, ZHANG Zhongjuan, ZHENG Chengdong, ZHANG Siwen, ZHANG Jin, ZHENG Chunxiu, WU Shikai, WANG Xue. Comparative analysis of agronomic traits and yield of different fresh corn varieties (series) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 837-849. |
| [3] | LIU Yiyang, ZHOU Peng, LIU Jingjing, WANG Xiaomin, HU Xinhua, FU Jinjun, GAO Yanming, LI Jianshe. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 103 tomato germplasm resources in streamlined cultivation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 324-334. |
| [4] | ZHANG Jinqiang, YANG Xiang, SU Xuede, WANG Huanhuan, LI Ming, LI Pengcheng. Evaluation of fruit quality difference of sweet cherry under different cultivation modes in solar greenhouse in northern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 446-453. |
| [5] | CHEN Hui, ZHANG Yongqiang, BI Haiyan, TANJun , CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, YU Jianxin, LU Dong, LEI Junjie. Yield formation characteristics of different spring wheat varieties in dryland farming area of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 13-20. |
| [6] | DU Yalong, FU Qiuping, AI Pengrui, MA Yingjie, QI Tong, PAN Yang. Comprehensive evaluation of irrigation treatment based on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated Gossypium barbadense [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 161-173. |
| [7] | WANG Xiang, DAI Junsheng. Analysis and driving factors of structure layout of forest and fruit industry in Tarim River Basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 227-231. |
| [8] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
| [9] | LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581. |
| [10] | ZHANG Fulin, LI Ning, LIU Yuxiang, CHEN Yijia, YU Qinghui, YAN Huizhuan. Effects of exogenous 2,4-Epibrassinolide and melatonin on fruit quality and peel morphology of cherry tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1738-1747. |
| [11] | Abudukadier Kurban, PAN Jinghai, CHEN Youqiang, LIU Huajun, DONG Xinjiu, BAI Xiaoshan, LI Sizhong, GAO Weishi, LI Xiaohui. Comprehensive evaluation of adaptability of late sowing sugar-beet varieties based on yield correlation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1368-1377. |
| [12] | YANG Junyan, YAN Miao, WU Haibo, YANG Wenli, WANG Haojie, MAO Jiancai, ZHAI Wenqiang, LI Junhua. The impact of high temperature on different thick -skinned melon varieties and comprehensive evaluation of its heat resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1386-1396. |
| [13] | ZHU Tao, Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang. Effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of resown Maize and verification of scheme optimization model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 835-844. |
| [14] | YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, FENG Guorui, Dawulai Jiekeshan, Buayixiamu Namanti, LIU Qi, Aierjuma Tuluhan, PENG Yuncheng. Comprehensive evaluation of dehydration of maize hybrid combinations based on principal component analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 318-325. |
| [15] | OU Yuan, LUO Shasha, WANG Ruyue, SUN Yali, HU Haifang. Effects of salt stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of american black walnut seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 393-401. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||