

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 1658-1669.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.011
• Food and cash crops column • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Yucheng1,2(
), TIAN Rui1,2, SHI Xiaolei1,2, Shanqimike 1,2, DING Sunlei1,2, ZHANG Hengbin3, ZHAO Jing3, ZHAN Yong3, YAN Yongliang1,2(
)
Received:2024-12-22
Online:2025-07-20
Published:2025-09-05
Correspondence author:
YAN Yongliang
Supported by:
吴玉成1,2(
), 田蕊1,2, 时晓磊1,2, 山其米克1,2, 丁孙磊1,2, 张恒斌3, 赵靓3, 战勇3, 严勇亮1,2(
)
通讯作者:
严勇亮
作者简介:吴玉成(1997-),男,硕士,研究方向为大豆抗逆育种,(E-mail)710526272@qq.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
WU Yucheng, TIAN Rui, SHI Xiaolei, Shanqimike , DING Sunlei, ZHANG Hengbin, ZHAO Jing, ZHAN Yong, YAN Yongliang. Comprehensive evaluation of drought tolerance for soybean germplasm at germination stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(7): 1658-1669.
吴玉成, 田蕊, 时晓磊, 山其米克, 丁孙磊, 张恒斌, 赵靓, 战勇, 严勇亮. 大豆萌发期耐旱性鉴定与优异种质筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(7): 1658-1669.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.011
| 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HG-001 | 绥农32 | HG-045 | 黑农54 | HG-089 | H4 | HG-133 | 黑河36 | HG-177 | PI475811A | |||||||
| HG-002 | 16487-2 | HG-046 | 克09-95 | HG-090 | 东农52 | HG-134 | 吉大豆2号 | HG-178 | PI475811B | |||||||
| HG-003 | 黑农68 | HG-047 | 垦丰16 | HG-091 | 北豆31 | HG-135 | 齐农25号 | HG-179 | Da Ba Dou | |||||||
| HG-004 | 黑河35 | HG-048 | H9 | HG-092 | 嫩丰17 | HG-136 | 黑河50 | HG-180 | Union | |||||||
| HG-005 | 齐农1号 | HG-049 | 绥农37 | HG-093 | 绥农10 | HG-137 | 合农92 | HG-181 | K092 | |||||||
| HG-006 | 圣豆44 | HG-050 | 绥农28 | HG-094 | 垦丰13 | HG-138 | 吉育86 | HG-182 | K099 | |||||||
| HG-007 | 绥农52 | HG-051 | 嫩丰20 | HG-095 | 中龙608 | HG-139 | 北豆26 | HG-183 | K138 | |||||||
| HG-008 | 合丰41 | HG-052 | 合农91 | HG-096 | 东生101 | HG-140 | 东生18 | HG-184 | JiangJinQingPiDou | |||||||
| HG-009 | 16YJ051-2 | HG-053 | 黑农53 | HG-097 | 齐农32号 | HG-141 | 16432-28 | HG-185 | Mi LanDouZi | |||||||
| HG-010 | 黑河48 | HG-054 | 绥农28 | HG-098 | 合农97 | HG-142 | 黑农51 | HG-186 | BaiHuaTieJia | |||||||
| HG-011 | 花农39 | HG-055 | 垦农32 | HG-099 | 吉育506 | HG-143 | 黑农50 | HG-187 | BaiHua | |||||||
| HG-012 | H5 | HG-056 | 垦豆39 | HG-100 | 东农42C | HG-144 | 合农73 | HG-188 | Uzbekskaja-2 | |||||||
| HG-013 | 合农76 | HG-057 | 垦农33 | HG-101 | 冀nf58 | HG-145 | 丰收24 | HG-189 | PI475810 | |||||||
| HG-014 | 齐农5号 | HG-058 | 昊疆1号 | HG-102 | 东生104 | HG-146 | 合丰50 | HG-190 | No.3233 | |||||||
| HG-015 | 合丰45 | HG-059 | 合丰25 | HG-103 | 贺丰7号 | HG-147 | 黑河24 | HG-191 | 455 | |||||||
| HG-016 | 垦农26 | HG-060 | 15321-2 | HG-104 | 合丰51 | HG-148 | H17 | HG-192 | FtC019 | |||||||
| HG-017 | 绥农35 | HG-061 | 东农56 | HG-105 | 绥农33 | HG-149 | 垦鉴35 | HG-193 | FtC012 | |||||||
| HG-018 | 东生22 | HG-062 | 黑农48 | HG-106 | 绥农26号 | HG-150 | 克14-758 | HG-194 | FtC013 | |||||||
| HG-019 | 平安豆8号 | HG-063 | 北豆5号 | HG-107 | 黑农52 | HG-151 | 绥农82 | HG-195 | FtC033 | |||||||
| HG-020 | 辽豆32 | HG-064 | 垦农18 | HG-108 | 黑农26 | HG-152 | 合农67 | HG-196 | FtC020 | |||||||
| HG-021 | 16487-12 | HG-065 | 合农63 | HG-109 | 黑农63 | HG-153 | 绥农1号 | HG-197 | FtC026 | |||||||
| HG-022 | 垦豆40 | HG-066 | 中龙606 | HG-110 | 吉育203 | HG-154 | 哈13-2089 | HG-198 | FtC030 | |||||||
| HG-023 | 长农20 | HG-067 | 16465-10 | HG-111 | 合丰56 | HG-155 | 东生12 | HG-199 | FtC031 | |||||||
| HG-024 | 合农61 | HG-068 | 绥农53 | HG-112 | 黑农48 | HG-156 | 南夏-7 | HG-200 | FtC032 | |||||||
| HG-025 | H3 | HG-069 | 东农55 | HG-113 | 黑农66 | HG-157 | 东生105 | HG-201 | FtC005 | |||||||
| HG-026 | 东农63 | HG-070 | 合丰52 | HG-114 | 郑1440 | HG-158 | 东生108 | HG-202 | FtC034 | |||||||
| HG-027 | 16409-1 | HG-071 | 黑农69 | HG-115 | 佳密豆6号 | HG-159 | 东农60 | HG-203 | FtC036 | |||||||
| HG-028 | 绥农41 | HG-072 | 1428 | HG-116 | 绥农27 | HG-160 | 佳试D | HG-204 | FtC039 | |||||||
| HG-029 | 16483-24 | HG-073 | 合丰35 | HG-117 | 16467-17 | HG-161 | JIM | HG-205 | FtC054 | |||||||
| HG-030 | CIZ1217 | HG-074 | 吉育93 | HG-118 | 吉育64 | HG-162 | 合农62 | HG-206 | FtC055 | |||||||
| HG-031 | 吉育89 | HG-075 | 陇中黄601 | HG-119 | 小白豆 | HG-163 | 吉小粒豆6号 | HG-207 | FtC059 | |||||||
| HG-032 | 黑农46 | HG-076 | 佳密豆6 | HG-120 | 北丰9号 | HG-164 | 佳试A | HG-208 | FtC069 | |||||||
| HG-033 | 东生23 | HG-077 | Flint | HG-121 | 登科1号 | HG-165 | 黑农64 | HG-209 | FtC074 | |||||||
| HG-034 | 哈12-4547 | HG-078 | 16482-6 | HG-122 | 绥农76 | HG-166 | 北豆43 | HG-210 | FtC078 | |||||||
| HG-035 | 黑农44 | HG-079 | 绥农71 | HG-123 | 垦丰22 | HG-167 | 15321-13 | HG-211 | FtC079 | |||||||
| HG-036 | 16488-2 | HG-080 | 吉密3 | HG-124 | 吉育303 | HG-168 | 华疆4 | HG-212 | FtC081 | |||||||
| HG-037 | 蒙豆36 | HG-081 | 绥农75 | HG-125 | 北疆1号 | HG-169 | 1474 | HG-213 | FtC082 | |||||||
| HG-038 | 垦豆25 | HG-082 | A2396 | HG-126 | 北豆10 | HG-170 | 吉育67 | HG-214 | FtC085 | |||||||
| HG-039 | 黑河53 | HG-083 | 吉育260 | HG-127 | 北豆40 | HG-171 | 昊疆13 | HG-215 | FtC089 | |||||||
| HG-040 | 合农68 | HG-084 | 吉育554 | HG-128 | 黑河30 | HG-172 | 花农38 | HG-216 | YanChengQiSiNiDou | |||||||
| HG-041 | AsgrowA1939 | HG-085 | 东生17 | HG-129 | 合丰52 | HG-173 | 东生102 | HG-217 | No.3226 | |||||||
| HG-042 | 绥农14 | HG-086 | Hobbie87 | HG-130 | 吉育508 | HG-174 | 新大豆8号 | HG-218 | No.10294 | |||||||
| HG-043 | 华疆17 | HG-087 | 吉育259 | HG-131 | 黑河27 | HG-175 | 新大豆23号 | |||||||||
| HG-044 | 齐农12号 | HG-088 | 吉育299 | HG-132 | 黑河13 | HG-176 | PI475812B | |||||||||
Tab.1 Supplement table information of 218 soybean accessions
| 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | 编号 ID | 名称 Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HG-001 | 绥农32 | HG-045 | 黑农54 | HG-089 | H4 | HG-133 | 黑河36 | HG-177 | PI475811A | |||||||
| HG-002 | 16487-2 | HG-046 | 克09-95 | HG-090 | 东农52 | HG-134 | 吉大豆2号 | HG-178 | PI475811B | |||||||
| HG-003 | 黑农68 | HG-047 | 垦丰16 | HG-091 | 北豆31 | HG-135 | 齐农25号 | HG-179 | Da Ba Dou | |||||||
| HG-004 | 黑河35 | HG-048 | H9 | HG-092 | 嫩丰17 | HG-136 | 黑河50 | HG-180 | Union | |||||||
| HG-005 | 齐农1号 | HG-049 | 绥农37 | HG-093 | 绥农10 | HG-137 | 合农92 | HG-181 | K092 | |||||||
| HG-006 | 圣豆44 | HG-050 | 绥农28 | HG-094 | 垦丰13 | HG-138 | 吉育86 | HG-182 | K099 | |||||||
| HG-007 | 绥农52 | HG-051 | 嫩丰20 | HG-095 | 中龙608 | HG-139 | 北豆26 | HG-183 | K138 | |||||||
| HG-008 | 合丰41 | HG-052 | 合农91 | HG-096 | 东生101 | HG-140 | 东生18 | HG-184 | JiangJinQingPiDou | |||||||
| HG-009 | 16YJ051-2 | HG-053 | 黑农53 | HG-097 | 齐农32号 | HG-141 | 16432-28 | HG-185 | Mi LanDouZi | |||||||
| HG-010 | 黑河48 | HG-054 | 绥农28 | HG-098 | 合农97 | HG-142 | 黑农51 | HG-186 | BaiHuaTieJia | |||||||
| HG-011 | 花农39 | HG-055 | 垦农32 | HG-099 | 吉育506 | HG-143 | 黑农50 | HG-187 | BaiHua | |||||||
| HG-012 | H5 | HG-056 | 垦豆39 | HG-100 | 东农42C | HG-144 | 合农73 | HG-188 | Uzbekskaja-2 | |||||||
| HG-013 | 合农76 | HG-057 | 垦农33 | HG-101 | 冀nf58 | HG-145 | 丰收24 | HG-189 | PI475810 | |||||||
| HG-014 | 齐农5号 | HG-058 | 昊疆1号 | HG-102 | 东生104 | HG-146 | 合丰50 | HG-190 | No.3233 | |||||||
| HG-015 | 合丰45 | HG-059 | 合丰25 | HG-103 | 贺丰7号 | HG-147 | 黑河24 | HG-191 | 455 | |||||||
| HG-016 | 垦农26 | HG-060 | 15321-2 | HG-104 | 合丰51 | HG-148 | H17 | HG-192 | FtC019 | |||||||
| HG-017 | 绥农35 | HG-061 | 东农56 | HG-105 | 绥农33 | HG-149 | 垦鉴35 | HG-193 | FtC012 | |||||||
| HG-018 | 东生22 | HG-062 | 黑农48 | HG-106 | 绥农26号 | HG-150 | 克14-758 | HG-194 | FtC013 | |||||||
| HG-019 | 平安豆8号 | HG-063 | 北豆5号 | HG-107 | 黑农52 | HG-151 | 绥农82 | HG-195 | FtC033 | |||||||
| HG-020 | 辽豆32 | HG-064 | 垦农18 | HG-108 | 黑农26 | HG-152 | 合农67 | HG-196 | FtC020 | |||||||
| HG-021 | 16487-12 | HG-065 | 合农63 | HG-109 | 黑农63 | HG-153 | 绥农1号 | HG-197 | FtC026 | |||||||
| HG-022 | 垦豆40 | HG-066 | 中龙606 | HG-110 | 吉育203 | HG-154 | 哈13-2089 | HG-198 | FtC030 | |||||||
| HG-023 | 长农20 | HG-067 | 16465-10 | HG-111 | 合丰56 | HG-155 | 东生12 | HG-199 | FtC031 | |||||||
| HG-024 | 合农61 | HG-068 | 绥农53 | HG-112 | 黑农48 | HG-156 | 南夏-7 | HG-200 | FtC032 | |||||||
| HG-025 | H3 | HG-069 | 东农55 | HG-113 | 黑农66 | HG-157 | 东生105 | HG-201 | FtC005 | |||||||
| HG-026 | 东农63 | HG-070 | 合丰52 | HG-114 | 郑1440 | HG-158 | 东生108 | HG-202 | FtC034 | |||||||
| HG-027 | 16409-1 | HG-071 | 黑农69 | HG-115 | 佳密豆6号 | HG-159 | 东农60 | HG-203 | FtC036 | |||||||
| HG-028 | 绥农41 | HG-072 | 1428 | HG-116 | 绥农27 | HG-160 | 佳试D | HG-204 | FtC039 | |||||||
| HG-029 | 16483-24 | HG-073 | 合丰35 | HG-117 | 16467-17 | HG-161 | JIM | HG-205 | FtC054 | |||||||
| HG-030 | CIZ1217 | HG-074 | 吉育93 | HG-118 | 吉育64 | HG-162 | 合农62 | HG-206 | FtC055 | |||||||
| HG-031 | 吉育89 | HG-075 | 陇中黄601 | HG-119 | 小白豆 | HG-163 | 吉小粒豆6号 | HG-207 | FtC059 | |||||||
| HG-032 | 黑农46 | HG-076 | 佳密豆6 | HG-120 | 北丰9号 | HG-164 | 佳试A | HG-208 | FtC069 | |||||||
| HG-033 | 东生23 | HG-077 | Flint | HG-121 | 登科1号 | HG-165 | 黑农64 | HG-209 | FtC074 | |||||||
| HG-034 | 哈12-4547 | HG-078 | 16482-6 | HG-122 | 绥农76 | HG-166 | 北豆43 | HG-210 | FtC078 | |||||||
| HG-035 | 黑农44 | HG-079 | 绥农71 | HG-123 | 垦丰22 | HG-167 | 15321-13 | HG-211 | FtC079 | |||||||
| HG-036 | 16488-2 | HG-080 | 吉密3 | HG-124 | 吉育303 | HG-168 | 华疆4 | HG-212 | FtC081 | |||||||
| HG-037 | 蒙豆36 | HG-081 | 绥农75 | HG-125 | 北疆1号 | HG-169 | 1474 | HG-213 | FtC082 | |||||||
| HG-038 | 垦豆25 | HG-082 | A2396 | HG-126 | 北豆10 | HG-170 | 吉育67 | HG-214 | FtC085 | |||||||
| HG-039 | 黑河53 | HG-083 | 吉育260 | HG-127 | 北豆40 | HG-171 | 昊疆13 | HG-215 | FtC089 | |||||||
| HG-040 | 合农68 | HG-084 | 吉育554 | HG-128 | 黑河30 | HG-172 | 花农38 | HG-216 | YanChengQiSiNiDou | |||||||
| HG-041 | AsgrowA1939 | HG-085 | 东生17 | HG-129 | 合丰52 | HG-173 | 东生102 | HG-217 | No.3226 | |||||||
| HG-042 | 绥农14 | HG-086 | Hobbie87 | HG-130 | 吉育508 | HG-174 | 新大豆8号 | HG-218 | No.10294 | |||||||
| HG-043 | 华疆17 | HG-087 | 吉育259 | HG-131 | 黑河27 | HG-175 | 新大豆23号 | |||||||||
| HG-044 | 齐农12号 | HG-088 | 吉育299 | HG-132 | 黑河13 | HG-176 | PI475812B | |||||||||
| 性状 Traits | 处理 Treatments | 最大值 Max. | 最小值 Min. | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发芽势GP | CK | 100.00% | 6.00% | 71.76% | 0.19 | 26.49 |
| 15% PEG | 93.00% | 2.00% | 43.96% | 0.21 | 48.21 | |
| 发芽率GR | CK | 100.00% | 11.00% | 78.97% | 0.15 | 19.25 |
| 15% PEG | 98.00% | 3.00% | 63.61% | 0.21 | 33.56 | |
| 发芽指数GI | CK | 127.93 | 5.59 | 78.68 | 26.30 | 33.43 |
| 15% PEG | 72.50 | 0.88 | 25.69 | 11.95 | 46.50 |
Tab.2 Variation analysis of germination-related traits for soybean under different stress
| 性状 Traits | 处理 Treatments | 最大值 Max. | 最小值 Min. | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发芽势GP | CK | 100.00% | 6.00% | 71.76% | 0.19 | 26.49 |
| 15% PEG | 93.00% | 2.00% | 43.96% | 0.21 | 48.21 | |
| 发芽率GR | CK | 100.00% | 11.00% | 78.97% | 0.15 | 19.25 |
| 15% PEG | 98.00% | 3.00% | 63.61% | 0.21 | 33.56 | |
| 发芽指数GI | CK | 127.93 | 5.59 | 78.68 | 26.30 | 33.43 |
| 15% PEG | 72.50 | 0.88 | 25.69 | 11.95 | 46.50 |
| 性状 Traits | 变异来源 Source | 平方和 SS | 自由度df | 均方 MS | F值 F value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 相对发芽势RGP | 品种 | 14.76 | 217 | 0.07 | 18.56 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.92 | |
| 相对发芽率RGR | 品种 | 19.23 | 217 | 0.09 | 11.96 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.75 | |
| 相对发芽指数RGI | 品种 | 5.52 | 217 | 0.03 | 15.78 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 | |
| 萌发耐旱指数PI | 品种 | 136 026.45 | 217 | 626.85 | 29.00 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 81.50 | 1 | 81.50 | 0.25 | 0.62 | |
| 伤害率DR | 品种 | 14.76 | 217 | 0.07 | 18.58 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.92 |
Tab.3 Changes of variance (ANOVA) of drought-related traits for soybean at germination stage
| 性状 Traits | 变异来源 Source | 平方和 SS | 自由度df | 均方 MS | F值 F value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 相对发芽势RGP | 品种 | 14.76 | 217 | 0.07 | 18.56 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.92 | |
| 相对发芽率RGR | 品种 | 19.23 | 217 | 0.09 | 11.96 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.75 | |
| 相对发芽指数RGI | 品种 | 5.52 | 217 | 0.03 | 15.78 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 | |
| 萌发耐旱指数PI | 品种 | 136 026.45 | 217 | 626.85 | 29.00 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 81.50 | 1 | 81.50 | 0.25 | 0.62 | |
| 伤害率DR | 品种 | 14.76 | 217 | 0.07 | 18.58 | <0.000 1 |
| 重复 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.92 |
| 性状 Traits | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV(%) | 偏度 Skew. | 峰度 Kurt. | 显著性 Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 相对发芽势RGP | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 35.11 | 0.19 | -0.58 | 1.81E-56 |
| 相对发芽率RGR | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 17.44 | 0.38 | -0.98 | 1.02E-81 |
| 相对发芽指数RGI | 0.09 | 0.63 | 0.33 | 27.88 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 1.96E-61 |
| 萌发耐旱指数PI | 0.03 | 1.92 | 0.80 | 44.43 | -0.16 | 0.24 | 4.44E-130 |
| 伤害率DR | 0.00% | 58.63% | 18.55% | 76.57 | 0.38 | 0.98 | 1.25E-70 |
Tab.4 Variation analysis of drought-related traits for soybean at germination stage
| 性状 Traits | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV(%) | 偏度 Skew. | 峰度 Kurt. | 显著性 Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 相对发芽势RGP | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 35.11 | 0.19 | -0.58 | 1.81E-56 |
| 相对发芽率RGR | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 17.44 | 0.38 | -0.98 | 1.02E-81 |
| 相对发芽指数RGI | 0.09 | 0.63 | 0.33 | 27.88 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 1.96E-61 |
| 萌发耐旱指数PI | 0.03 | 1.92 | 0.80 | 44.43 | -0.16 | 0.24 | 4.44E-130 |
| 伤害率DR | 0.00% | 58.63% | 18.55% | 76.57 | 0.38 | 0.98 | 1.25E-70 |
| 分类 Classification | 数量 Number | 频率 Frequency (%) | 性状 Trait | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 类群ⅠGroup Ⅰ | 42 | 19.27 | RGP | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 9.14 |
| RGR | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 3.33 | |||
| RGI | 0.32 | 0.86 | 0.45 | 27.52 | |||
| PI | 0.69 | 1.92 | 1.25 | 20.52 | |||
| DR | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 66.97 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.72 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 6.29 | |||
| 类群ⅡGroup Ⅱ | 126 | 57.80 | RGP | 0.38 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 16.68 |
| RGR | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.84 | 9.90 | |||
| RGI | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.34 | 18.52 | |||
| PI | 0.25 | 1.31 | 0.81 | 27.48 | |||
| DR | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 50.50 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.49 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 11.04 | |||
| 类群ⅢGroup Ⅲ | 31 | 14.22 | RGP | 0.07 | 0.55 | 0.40 | 28.88 |
| RGR | 0.49 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 15.40 | |||
| RGI | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 15.75 | |||
| PI | 0.05 | 0.80 | 0.48 | 31.90 | |||
| DR | 0.11 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 28.31 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 10.74 | |||
| 类群ⅣGroup Ⅳ | 19 | 8.72 | RGP | 0.04 | 0.38 | 0.18 | 60.95 |
| RGR | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 38.24 | |||
| RGI | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 43.59 | |||
| PI | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.25 | 48.36 | |||
| DR | 0.54 | 0.93 | 0.66 | 19.76 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 50.51 |
Tab.5 Clustering analysis of soybean drought tolerant at germination stage
| 分类 Classification | 数量 Number | 频率 Frequency (%) | 性状 Trait | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 类群ⅠGroup Ⅰ | 42 | 19.27 | RGP | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 9.14 |
| RGR | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 3.33 | |||
| RGI | 0.32 | 0.86 | 0.45 | 27.52 | |||
| PI | 0.69 | 1.92 | 1.25 | 20.52 | |||
| DR | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 66.97 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.72 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 6.29 | |||
| 类群ⅡGroup Ⅱ | 126 | 57.80 | RGP | 0.38 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 16.68 |
| RGR | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.84 | 9.90 | |||
| RGI | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.34 | 18.52 | |||
| PI | 0.25 | 1.31 | 0.81 | 27.48 | |||
| DR | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 50.50 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.49 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 11.04 | |||
| 类群ⅢGroup Ⅲ | 31 | 14.22 | RGP | 0.07 | 0.55 | 0.40 | 28.88 |
| RGR | 0.49 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 15.40 | |||
| RGI | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 15.75 | |||
| PI | 0.05 | 0.80 | 0.48 | 31.90 | |||
| DR | 0.11 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 28.31 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 10.74 | |||
| 类群ⅣGroup Ⅳ | 19 | 8.72 | RGP | 0.04 | 0.38 | 0.18 | 60.95 |
| RGR | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 38.24 | |||
| RGI | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 43.59 | |||
| PI | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.25 | 48.36 | |||
| DR | 0.54 | 0.93 | 0.66 | 19.76 | |||
| 隶属函数值 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 50.51 |
| 品种 Varieties | 相对发芽势 RGP | 相对 发芽率 RGR | 相对 发芽指数 RGI | 萌发 耐旱指数 PI | 伤害率 DR | 隶属 函数值 Membership function | 分类 Classification | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.10294 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 1.66 | 0.05 | 0.92 | I | 日本 |
| 东农60 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.58 | 1.92 | 0.05 | 0.90 | I | 中国黑龙江 |
| PI475810 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.55 | 1.79 | 0.02 | 0.89 | I | 日本 |
| No.3226 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 1.37 | 0.09 | 0.86 | I | 日本 |
| FtC039 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.56 | 1.44 | 0.03 | 0.85 | I | 日本 |
| JiangJinQingPiDou | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.47 | 1.48 | 0.06 | 0.82 | I | 日本 |
| FtC005 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 1.45 | 0.01 | 0.82 | I | 日本 |
| Uzbekskaja-2 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 1.49 | 0.01 | 0.82 | I | 日本 |
| Union | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 1.43 | 0.01 | 0.81 | I | 日本 |
| FtC054 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 1.41 | 0.01 | 0.81 | I | 日本 |
Tab.6 Screening of elite drought tolerant soybean accessions at germination stage
| 品种 Varieties | 相对发芽势 RGP | 相对 发芽率 RGR | 相对 发芽指数 RGI | 萌发 耐旱指数 PI | 伤害率 DR | 隶属 函数值 Membership function | 分类 Classification | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.10294 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 1.66 | 0.05 | 0.92 | I | 日本 |
| 东农60 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.58 | 1.92 | 0.05 | 0.90 | I | 中国黑龙江 |
| PI475810 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.55 | 1.79 | 0.02 | 0.89 | I | 日本 |
| No.3226 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 1.37 | 0.09 | 0.86 | I | 日本 |
| FtC039 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.56 | 1.44 | 0.03 | 0.85 | I | 日本 |
| JiangJinQingPiDou | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.47 | 1.48 | 0.06 | 0.82 | I | 日本 |
| FtC005 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 1.45 | 0.01 | 0.82 | I | 日本 |
| Uzbekskaja-2 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 1.49 | 0.01 | 0.82 | I | 日本 |
| Union | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 1.43 | 0.01 | 0.81 | I | 日本 |
| FtC054 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 1.41 | 0.01 | 0.81 | I | 日本 |
| 品种编号 ID | 原始值 Primary | 回归值 Regression | 估计精度 Evaluation accuracy(%) | 品种编号 ID | 原始值 Primary | 回归值 Regression | 估计精度 Evaluation accuracy(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HG-218 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 100.00 | HG-005 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.98 |
| HG-159 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 99.99 | HG-076 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 99.98 |
| HG-189 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 100.00 | HG-077 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 99.99 |
| HG-217 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 99.99 | HG-022 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 99.99 |
| HG-204 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 99.99 | HG-052 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.98 |
| HG-184 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 99.99 | HG-176 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.99 |
| HG-201 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 99.99 | HG-119 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.97 |
| HG-188 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 99.99 | HG-187 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.98 |
| HG-180 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 99.99 | HG-163 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.98 |
| HG-205 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 99.99 | HG-088 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.95 |
| HG-175 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 99.99 | HG-216 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.97 |
| HG-169 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 99.99 | HG-147 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.97 |
| HG-111 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.99 | HG-144 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.98 |
| HG-108 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.98 | HG-197 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.98 |
| HG-200 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.98 | HG-179 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.98 |
| HG-214 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.99 | HG-008 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-177 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 99.99 | HG-148 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-150 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 99.98 | HG-211 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-208 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.99 | HG-023 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.95 |
| HG-115 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.99 | HG-038 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-185 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.99 | HG-103 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 99.99 |
Tab.7 Precision analysis of regression equation for soybean using Group I
| 品种编号 ID | 原始值 Primary | 回归值 Regression | 估计精度 Evaluation accuracy(%) | 品种编号 ID | 原始值 Primary | 回归值 Regression | 估计精度 Evaluation accuracy(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HG-218 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 100.00 | HG-005 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.98 |
| HG-159 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 99.99 | HG-076 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 99.98 |
| HG-189 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 100.00 | HG-077 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 99.99 |
| HG-217 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 99.99 | HG-022 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 99.99 |
| HG-204 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 99.99 | HG-052 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.98 |
| HG-184 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 99.99 | HG-176 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.99 |
| HG-201 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 99.99 | HG-119 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.97 |
| HG-188 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 99.99 | HG-187 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.98 |
| HG-180 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 99.99 | HG-163 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 99.98 |
| HG-205 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 99.99 | HG-088 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.95 |
| HG-175 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 99.99 | HG-216 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.97 |
| HG-169 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 99.99 | HG-147 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.97 |
| HG-111 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.99 | HG-144 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.98 |
| HG-108 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.98 | HG-197 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.98 |
| HG-200 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.98 | HG-179 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 99.98 |
| HG-214 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 99.99 | HG-008 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-177 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 99.99 | HG-148 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-150 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 99.98 | HG-211 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-208 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.99 | HG-023 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.95 |
| HG-115 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.99 | HG-038 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 99.98 |
| HG-185 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 99.99 | HG-103 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 99.99 |
| [1] | Pei R L, Zhang J Y, Tian L, et al. Identification of novel QTL associated with soybean isoflavone content[J]. The Crop Journal, 2018, 6(3): 244-252. |
| [2] | Seo J H, Kim K S, Ko J M, et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis for soybean (Glycine max) seed protein and oil concentrations using selected breeding populations[J]. Plant Breeding, 2019, 138(1): 95-104. |
| [3] | Liu J Q, Jiang A H, Ma R H, et al. QTL mapping for seed quality traits under multiple environments in soybean (Glycine max L.)[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(9): 2382. |
| [4] | 樊瑀, 董淑琦, 原向阳, 等. 谷子种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(6): 42-54. |
| FAN Yu, DONG Shuqi, YUAN Xiangyang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of foxtail millet germplasm resources during germination period and drought resistance index screening[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022, 27(6): 42-54. | |
| [5] | 岳艳琳. 气候变化下长江流域未来径流与旱涝变化特征研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2022. |
| YUE Yanlin. The changes of future runoff and drought and flood in the Yangtze River Basin under climate change[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2022. | |
| [6] | 张海燕, 李贵全. 大豆抗旱性与生理生态指标关系的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(8): 140-142. |
| ZHANG Haiyan, LI Guiquan. Study on the relationships between soybean drought-resistance and physiological and ecological indicators[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(8): 140-142. | |
| [7] | 刘文夫. 干旱胁迫对大豆养分吸收及碳水化合物形成影响的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2014. |
| LIU Wenfu. Effects of drought stress on soybean nutrients absorption and carbohydrate formation[D]. Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University, 2014. | |
| [8] |
张海平, 张俊峰, 陈妍, 等. 大豆种质资源萌发期耐旱性评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(1): 130-138.
DOI |
|
ZHANG Haiping, ZHANG Junfeng, CHEN Yan, et al. Identification and evaluation of soybean germplasm resources for drought tolerance during germination stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(1): 130-138.
DOI |
|
| [9] | 赵宏伟, 李秋祝, 魏永霞. 不同生育时期干旱对大豆主要生理参数及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2006, 25(3): 329-332. |
| ZHAO Hongwei, LI Qiuzhu, WEI Yongxia. Effect of drought at different growth stages on main physiological parameters and yield in soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2006, 25(3): 329-332. | |
| [10] | 闫春娟, 王文斌, 涂晓杰, 等. 不同生育时期干旱胁迫对大豆根系特性及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(1): 59-62, 67. |
| YAN Chunjuan, WANG Wenbin, TU Xiaojie, et al. Effect of drought stress at different growth stage on yield and root characteristics of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2013, 32(1): 59-62, 67. | |
| [11] | 曹秀清, 蒋尚明. 干旱胁迫对大豆品质及产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(16): 3-4, 7. |
| CAO Xiuqing, JIANG Shangming. Effect of drought stress on yield and quality of soybean[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(16): 3-4, 7. | |
| [12] | 原小燕, 符明联, 何柳, 等. 芥菜型油菜资源品质与萌发期模拟干旱抗性的评价及其相关性分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2023, 41(5): 1-11, 21. |
| YUAN Xiaoyan, FU Minglian, HE Liu, et al. Correlation analysis of quality characteristics and evaluation of simulated drought resistance at germination stage of Brassica juncea[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2023, 41(5): 1-11, 21. | |
| [13] | 高利英, 邓永胜, 王晓歌, 等. 不同棉花品种种子萌发期耐旱性综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(4): 34-41. |
| GAO Liying, DENG Yongsheng, WANG Xiaoge, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of different cotton varieties at germination stage[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 55(4): 34-41. | |
| [14] |
张娟伟, 石亚飞, 路旭平, 等. 种子萌发期粳稻种质资源耐旱性综合评价[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(11): 2093-2103.
DOI |
|
ZHANG Juanwei, SHI Yafei, LU Xuping, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought tolerance of Japonica rice germplasm resources at seed germination stage[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(11): 2093-2103.
DOI |
|
| [15] | 李云, 杨梦涵, 王健, 等. PEG胁迫下谷子品种(系)萌发期耐旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(4): 29-35, 43. |
| LI Yun, YANG Menghan, WANG Jian, et al. Identification and evaluation of drought tolerance of millet varieties (lines) at germination stage under PEG stress[J]. Seed, 2022, 41(4): 29-35, 43. | |
| [16] |
王永刚, 张胜军, 刘亚丽, 等. 新疆冬小麦品种资源萌发期耐旱性鉴定与筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2024-2034.
DOI |
|
WANG Yonggang, ZHANG Shengjun, LIU Yali, et al. Identification and screening of drought tolerance in winter wheat cultivars in Xinjiang during germination period[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2024-2034.
DOI |
|
| [17] | 王婷婷, 贾晓艳, 赵永锋. 不同玉米种子萌发期耐旱性分析[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(4): 55-59. |
| WANG Tingting, JIA Xiaoyan, ZHAO Yongfeng. Analysis on drought tolerance of different maize seeds at germination stage[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(4): 55-59. | |
| [18] | 杜艳丽, 张兆宁, 李思琪, 等. 黑龙江地区主栽大豆品种萌发期耐旱性综合鉴定及评价[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2022, 34(4): 1-8, 22. |
| DU Yanli, ZHANG Zhaoning, LI Siqi, et al. Tolerance comprehensive identification and evaluation of different soybean cultivars under drought stress at germination stage in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2022, 34(4): 1-8, 22. | |
| [19] | 陈亚光, 昝凯, 杨雨阳, 等. 不同大豆品种(系)萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 天津农业科学, 2023, 29(10): 13-17, 24. |
| CHEN Yaguang, ZAN Kai, YANG Yuyang, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of different soybean varietes(lines) at germination stage[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 29(10): 13-17, 24. | |
| [20] | 赵振宁, 赵宝勰. 不同大豆品种在萌发期对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(2): 131-136. |
| ZHAO Zhenning, ZHAO Baoxie. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of different soybean varieties to drought stress at germination stage[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(2): 131-136. | |
| [21] | 李健平, 谢路, 韩德志, 等. 早熟大豆种质资源萌发期耐旱性评价[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022(5): 1-6. |
| LI Jianping, XIE Lu, HAN Dezhi, et al. Evaluation of drought tolerance during germination of early-maturing soybean germplasm resources[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022(5): 1-6. | |
| [22] | 李江, 龙爱华. 近60年新疆水资源变化及可持续发展利用思考[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2021, (7): 1-5, 72. |
| LI Jiang, LONG Aihua. Changes in water resources and the idea of sustainable development utilization in Xinjiang over the past 60 years[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2021, (7): 1-5, 72. | |
| [23] | 黄程琪. 新疆农业水资源利用效率及影响因素分析[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. |
| HUANG Chengqi. Analysis on utilization efficiency and influencing factors of agricultural water resources in Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. | |
| [24] | 李云霞, 范军亮, 关新元, 等. 新疆灌区农业节水发展现状与对策建议[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2024, 43(2): 93-98. |
| LI Yunxia, FAN Junliang, GUAN Xinyuan, et al. Status and countermeasures of agricultural water saving development in irrigation areas of Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2024, 43(2): 93-98. | |
| [25] | 轩俊伟, 郑江华, 刘志辉. 基于SPEI的新疆干旱时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(2): 338-344. |
| XUAN Junwei, ZHENG Jianghua, LIU Zhihui. SPEI-based spatiotemporal variation of drought in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(2): 338-344. | |
| [26] | 任海红, 刘学义, 李文强, 等. 大豆不同时期抗旱鉴定研究进展[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2016, (8): 111-114. |
| REN Haihong, LIU Xueyi, LI Wenqiang, et al. Research progress on drought resistance identification of soybean at different stages[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, (8): 111-114. | |
| [27] | 孙鹏宇, 裴双康, 周永刚, 等. 大豆萌发期和全生育期抗旱性评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(2): 490-502. |
| SUN Pengyu, PEI Shuangkang, ZHOU Yonggang, et al. Evaluation and screening of soybean drought resistance during germination and whole growth period[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2024, 22(2): 490-502. | |
| [28] | 刘建生, 邵晓梅, 韩冬, 等. 干旱对苗期大豆影响的研究概况[J]. 现代化农业, 2019, (6): 10-11. |
| LIU Jiansheng, SHAO Xiaomei, HAN Dong, et al. General situation of research on the effect of drought on soybean at seedling stage[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2019, (6): 10-11. | |
| [29] | 刘粤阳, 闫海燕, 张琦, 等. 13个玉米品种萌发期耐旱性鉴定与筛选[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024, (7): 21-23, 27. |
| LIU Yueyang, YAN Haiyan, ZHANG Qi, et al. Identification and screening of 13 maize varieties with drought resistance during germination period[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, (7): 21-23, 27. | |
| [30] | 曹勇, 姬虎太, 裴雪霞, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下6份冬小麦种子抗旱性评价[J]. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44(6): 723-725. |
| CAO Yong, JI Hutai, PEI Xuexia, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of six winter wheat seeds under PEG simulated drought stress[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(6): 723-725. | |
| [31] | 彭玉琳, 崔晓漫, 张沥曼玲, 等. 不同生育期大麦抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J/OL]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, (8), (2024-01-30). |
| PENG Yuling, CUI Xiaoman, ZHANG Limanling, et al. Identification of drought resistance and selection of drought resistance indicators in barley at different growth periods[J/OL]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Ed.), 2024, (8), (2024-01-30) | |
| [32] | 赵少迪, 胡传伟, 张玉莲, 等. 苦荞种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J/OL]. 干旱地区农业研究, (2024-05-10)[2024-05-20]. |
| ZHAO Shaodi, HU Chuanwei, ZHANG Yuliang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of Tartary buckwheat(Fagopyrum tataricum)germplasm resources at germination stage[J/OL]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas (2024-05-10) [2024-05-20]. | |
| [33] | 杨秀丽, 宁东贤, 赵玉坤, 等. PEG渗透胁迫条件下26份花生品种萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 上海农业学报, 2021, 37(6): 35-42. |
| YANG Xiuli, NING Dongxian, ZHAO Yukun, et al. Evaluation of 26 peanuts drought resistance under PEG osmotic treatment at germination stage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2021, 37(6): 35-42. | |
| [34] |
胡玉璐, 冯慧, 任江陵, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对不同糜子品种萌发的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(6): 18-27.
DOI |
|
HU Yulu, FENG Hui, REN Jiangling, et al. Effects of PEG simulated drought stress on the germination of different Panicum miliaceum L. varieties[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(6): 18-27.
DOI |
|
| [35] |
王敏, 杨万明, 侯燕平, 等. 不同类型大豆花荚期抗旱性形态指标及其综合评价[J]. 核农学报, 2010, 24(1): 154-159.
DOI |
|
WANG Min, YANG Wanming, HOU Yanping, et al. Morphological indexes of drought resistance of soybean accessions and its comprehensive evaluation on flowering and podding stage[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 24(1): 154-159.
DOI |
|
| [36] |
郑巨云, 曾辉, 王俊铎, 等. 陆地棉品种资源萌发期耐盐性的隶属函数法评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(9): 1579-1592.
DOI |
|
ZHENG Juyun, ZENG Hui, WANG Junduo, et al. Comprehensive assessment of salt tolerance of the upland cotton varities resources in seedling stage by membership function method[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(9): 1579-1592.
DOI |
|
| [37] | 金杭霞, 郭丹丹, 杨清华, 等. 利用模糊隶属函数法综合评价大豆萌发期耐盐性[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(24): 8265-8271. |
| JIN Hangxia, GUO Dandan, YANG Qinghua, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in soybean germination period by fuzzy subordinate function method[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(24): 8265-8271. | |
| [38] | 朱丽丽, 张发玉, 安宁, 等. 116份藜麦种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2024, 42(1): 23-31. |
| ZHU Lili, ZHANG Fayu, AN Ning, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of 116 quinoa germplasm resources during germination[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2024, 42(1): 23-31. | |
| [39] | 赵兴震. 大豆耐旱性评价及耐旱相关基因挖掘[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020. |
| ZHAO Xingzhen. Drought tolerance identification and gene discovery in soybean[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020. | |
| [40] | 邓思雪. 干旱胁迫下不同大豆品种萌发特性及其耐旱性评价[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018. |
| DENG Sixue. Germination characteristic under drought stress and evaluation of drought tolerance of soybean varieties[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018. | |
| [41] |
任茂, 张文英. 棉花品种耐热性分析及鉴定指标筛选[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(4): 788-794.
DOI |
|
REN Mao, ZHANG Wenying. Evaluation of heat tolerance and screening the index for the assessment of heat tolerance in upland cotton[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(4): 788-794.
DOI |
|
| [42] | 胡雯媚, 王思宇, 樊高琼, 等. 西南麦区小麦品种苗期抗旱性鉴定及其指标筛选[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(2): 182-189. |
| HU Wenmei, WANG Siyu, FAN Gaoqiong, et al. Analysis on the drought resistance and screening of drought resistance appraisal indexes of wheat cultivars in seedling stage in southwest area[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(2): 182-189. | |
| [43] | 牛丽, 刘源, 于康珂, 等. 玉米杂交种苗期耐热性评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2015, 23(1): 107-114. |
| NIU Li, LIU Yuan, YU Kangke, et al. Evaluation of heat-tolerance of maize hybrids at seedling stage[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2015, 23(1): 107-114. | |
| [44] | 姚佳睿, 吕金钊, 陈康, 等. 不同油麦菜品种萌发期耐热指标筛选及耐热性评价[J]. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(3): 511-520. |
| YAO Jiarui L? Jinzhao, CHEN Kang, et al. Screening and evaluation of heat resistance indexes in different lettuce varieties at germination stage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 511-520. | |
| [45] |
任毅, 王仙, 张金汕, 等. 中亚大麦品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(5): 882-889.
DOI |
|
REN Yi, WANG Xian, ZHANG Jinshan, et al. Screening and identification of drought resistance of central Asian barley varieties at germination stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(5): 882-889.
DOI |
|
| [46] | 白金顺, 王雪翠, 王艳秋. 箭筈豌豆种质资源萌发期抗旱指标筛选及抗旱性评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2253-2263. |
| BAI Jinshun, WANG Xuecui, WANG Yanqiu. Screening of drought-resistance index and drought-resistance evaluation of common vetch(Vicia sativa L.) germplasms at germination stage[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2253-2263. | |
| [47] | 摆福红, 王凯彬, 马小红, 等. 不同萝卜品种种子萌发期抗旱性综合评价及抗旱指标筛选[J/OL]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, (8). (2024-01-31)[2024-05-20]. |
| BAI Fuhong, WANG Kaibin, MA Xiaohong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of different radish varieties at seed germination stage and screening of drought resistance indexes[J/OL]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Ed.), 2024, (8). (2024-01-31)[2024-05-20]. |
| [1] | ZHANG Tianyu, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, ZHANG Dawei, Arman Ablimet, WU Mingzhe, MA Jun, JIAO Yang, YANG Liyun, LIU Yuanyuan, MA Qingqian, CHEN Qin, XU Haijiang. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of cotton germplasm resources at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(7): 1697-1708. |
| [2] | LIU Leilei, ZHAO Guoqin, NIE Junfang, YU Yuehua, NI Zhiyong. Cloning and subcellular localization analysis of the GmNF-YC4 gene in soybean [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(6): 1365-1370. |
| [3] | BAI Feng, LUO Chunyan, ZHANG Kai, YU Lijuan, Nazhakaiti Ainiwaner, MA Junde, Jumaheng Tayierbieke, Talihati Kemailebayi, Aminiguti Abulaizi, Maerziya Yasen, ZHOU Xirong, ZHANG Yanhua. Correlation and principal component analysis of body weight and body size in Kazakh sheep [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(6): 1552-1560. |
| [4] | LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comprehensive evaluation of low temperature tolerance of different varieties of spring wheat seeds during germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 820-828. |
| [5] | LI Ming, ZHENG Huanbin, WANG Mingjing, ZHAO Beifang, ZHANG Sitong, YANG Suxin. Effect of salt stress on soybean roots and GWAS analysis in seedling stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 627-643. |
| [6] | CHEN Hui, ZHANG Yongqiang, BI Haiyan, TANJun , CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, YU Jianxin, LU Dong, LEI Junjie. Yield formation characteristics of different spring wheat varieties in dryland farming area of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 13-20. |
| [7] | DU Xiaojing, HOU Tianyu, LI Dong, LYU Yuping, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Yanhong, ZHAO Zhiqiang, Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, WANG Fengbin. Identification of drought tolerance and selection of excellent varieties of rice seeds at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 95-102. |
| [8] | LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581. |
| [9] | Mahemuti Abulaiti, Muhetaer zhare, Mireguli Waili, Hadier Yishake. Correlation and regression analysis between leaf margin scorch diseases and leaf nutrient content of walnut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 945-953. |
| [10] | YANG Xiangbo, CHEN Liangyu, YANG Songnan, CHEN Xifeng, XING Weiming, LI Xueying, CONG Weixuan, ZANG Zhenyuan, ZANG Yuanbo, ZHANG Jun. Phenotype analysis and comprehensive evaluation of spring soybean germplasm resources from northeast China [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2921-2933. |
| [11] | SONG Bingmei, JIANG Yan, CHEN Xin, ZHANG Yu, CHENG Wannan, PAN Hongsheng. Evaluation of saline/alkali tolerance of new transgenic High-Yield cotton at germination and seedling stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247. |
| [12] | MAO Xiaofei, HUANG Shiping, YIN Fangliu, ZENG Youling. Prokaryotic expression of HcALDH7B4 gene enhanced salt tolerance and drought resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 2006-2012. |
| [13] | SHI Xiaolei, DING Sunlei, CONG Hua, ZHANG Jinbo, QU Kejia, WANG Xingzhou, HAN dai, YAN Yongliang. Gray correlation analysis of reast soybean yield correlation traits [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1641-1652. |
| [14] | YAN Yongliang, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, SHI Xiaolei, WANG Xingzhou, ZHANG Jinbo, CONG Hua. Comparative study on the agronomic traits and yields of different soybean varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1653-1662. |
| [15] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||