Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (12): 2157-2168.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.12.001
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Molecular Genetics . Cultivation Physiology · Storage and Preservation Processing • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Jianfeng(), FAN Zheru(
), ZHANG Yueqiang, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, ZHAO Qi
Received:
2021-01-05
Online:
2021-12-20
Published:
2021-12-31
Correspondence author:
FAN Zheru
Supported by:
李剑峰(), 樊哲儒(
), 张跃强, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 张宏芝, 王立红, 赵奇
通讯作者:
樊哲儒
作者简介:
李剑峰(1979-),男,陕西人,副研究员,研究方向为小麦诱变育种,(E-mail) Ljfm1979@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LI Jianfeng, FAN Zheru, ZHANG Yueqiang, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, ZHAO Qi. Study on the Performance of Quality-related Characters of Main Spring Wheat Planted in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2157-2168.
李剑峰, 樊哲儒, 张跃强, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 张宏芝, 王立红, 赵奇. 不同生态区新疆主栽春小麦品种品质相关性状表现及稳定性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2157-2168.
品种 Varieties | 蛋白含量 Protein content | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 15.18 | 0.753 | 0.133 | 2.402 | -0.061 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 14.28 | -0.152 | 0.405 | 4.457 | -0.547 | E2 | 不好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 14.14 | -0.290 | 0.111 | 2.355 | 1.633 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 14.12 | -0.310 | 0.730 | 6.050 | 2.975 | E4 | 不好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 14.41 | 0.282 | 0.258 | 3.523 | 0.552 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 14.29 | 0.155 | 0.067 | 1.811 | 1.407 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 14.02 | -0.107 | 0.365 | 4.309 | 0.127 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 13.80 | -0.330 | 0.269 | 3.754 | 1.913 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 1 Protein content
品种 Varieties | 蛋白含量 Protein content | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 15.18 | 0.753 | 0.133 | 2.402 | -0.061 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 14.28 | -0.152 | 0.405 | 4.457 | -0.547 | E2 | 不好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 14.14 | -0.290 | 0.111 | 2.355 | 1.633 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 14.12 | -0.310 | 0.730 | 6.050 | 2.975 | E4 | 不好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 14.41 | 0.282 | 0.258 | 3.523 | 0.552 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 14.29 | 0.155 | 0.067 | 1.811 | 1.407 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 14.02 | -0.107 | 0.365 | 4.309 | 0.127 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 13.80 | -0.330 | 0.269 | 3.754 | 1.913 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
品种 Varieties | 面筋度 Gluten | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 33.27 | 1.695 | 1.042 | 3.067 | -0.928 | E1 | 较好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 31.36 | -0.218 | 1.794 | 4.270 | 1.055 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 30.85 | -0.724 | 0.917 | 3.102 | 1.920 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 30.82 | -0.752 | 3.367 | 5.952 | 1.951 | E4 | 不好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 31.52 | 0.668 | 0.861 | 2.944 | 0.930 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 31.05 | 0.202 | 0.290 | 1.733 | 1.336 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 30.54 | -0.306 | 0.753 | 2.840 | 1.588 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 30.29 | -0.564 | 2.565 | 5.287 | 0.145 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 2 Gluten effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 面筋度 Gluten | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 33.27 | 1.695 | 1.042 | 3.067 | -0.928 | E1 | 较好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 31.36 | -0.218 | 1.794 | 4.270 | 1.055 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 30.85 | -0.724 | 0.917 | 3.102 | 1.920 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 30.82 | -0.752 | 3.367 | 5.952 | 1.951 | E4 | 不好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 31.52 | 0.668 | 0.861 | 2.944 | 0.930 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 31.05 | 0.202 | 0.290 | 1.733 | 1.336 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 30.54 | -0.306 | 0.753 | 2.840 | 1.588 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 30.29 | -0.564 | 2.565 | 5.287 | 0.145 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
品种 Varieties | 稳定时间 Stability time (min) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 8.83 | 0.125 | 0.034 | 2.104 | 0.960 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 8.77 | 0.064 | 0.087 | 3.361 | 0.824 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 8.67 | -0.035 | 0.110 | 3.831 | 1.214 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 8.55 | -0.154 | 0.003 | 0.637 | 1.002 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 8.63 | 0.496 | 0.285 | 6.186 | 1.104 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 8.19 | 0.054 | 0.735 | 10.471 | 0.207 | E1,E3 | 一般 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 8.00 | -0.134 | 0.408 | 7.984 | 1.186 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 7.72 | -0.416 | 0.134 | 4.750 | 1.503 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 3 Dough stabilization time
品种 Varieties | 稳定时间 Stability time (min) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 8.83 | 0.125 | 0.034 | 2.104 | 0.960 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 8.77 | 0.064 | 0.087 | 3.361 | 0.824 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 8.67 | -0.035 | 0.110 | 3.831 | 1.214 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 8.55 | -0.154 | 0.003 | 0.637 | 1.002 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 8.63 | 0.496 | 0.285 | 6.186 | 1.104 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 8.19 | 0.054 | 0.735 | 10.471 | 0.207 | E1,E3 | 一般 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 8.00 | -0.134 | 0.408 | 7.984 | 1.186 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 7.72 | -0.416 | 0.134 | 4.750 | 1.503 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
品种 Varieties | 吸水率 Water absorption rate(%) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 59.33 | 0.848 | 0.593 | 1.298 | 1.343 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 58.79 | 0.305 | 1.054 | 1.746 | 0.805 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 57.97 | -0.516 | 0.292 | 0.933 | 1.064 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 57.85 | -0.637 | 0.904 | 1.644 | 0.789 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 60.17 | 1.598 | 0.537 | 1.218 | 1.178 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 58.44 | -0.131 | 0.027 | 0.282 | 0.960 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 58.43 | -0.148 | 1.469 | 2.074 | 1.407 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 57.25 | -1.319 | 2.903 | 2.976 | 0.455 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 4 Water absorption rate effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 吸水率 Water absorption rate(%) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 59.33 | 0.848 | 0.593 | 1.298 | 1.343 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 58.79 | 0.305 | 1.054 | 1.746 | 0.805 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 57.97 | -0.516 | 0.292 | 0.933 | 1.064 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 57.85 | -0.637 | 0.904 | 1.644 | 0.789 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 60.17 | 1.598 | 0.537 | 1.218 | 1.178 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 58.44 | -0.131 | 0.027 | 0.282 | 0.960 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 58.43 | -0.148 | 1.469 | 2.074 | 1.407 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 57.25 | -1.319 | 2.903 | 2.976 | 0.455 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Fig.2 Differences of quality characters among different tested varieties Note:E:water absorption rate (%)t, F: sedimentation value, G:flour yield rate (%), H: maximum tensile resistance
品种 Varieties | 沉降值 Zeleny (mL) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 34.05 | 2.121 | 0.844 | 2.699 | 0.503 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 31.58 | -0.352 | 1.063 | 3.265 | 1.380 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 31.54 | -0.384 | 3.769 | 6.155 | -0.029 | E1,E2 | 较差 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 30.54 | -1.384 | 6.897 | 8.598 | 2.146 | E4 | 不好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 31.85 | 1.237 | 3.589 | 5.948 | 0.849 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 31.03 | 0.415 | 1.882 | 4.422 | 1.391 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 29.97 | -0.638 | 2.480 | 5.254 | 1.496 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 29.60 | -1.014 | 5.055 | 7.596 | 0.263 | E1 | 不好 |
Table 5 Sedimentation value effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 沉降值 Zeleny (mL) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 34.05 | 2.121 | 0.844 | 2.699 | 0.503 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 31.58 | -0.352 | 1.063 | 3.265 | 1.380 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 31.54 | -0.384 | 3.769 | 6.155 | -0.029 | E1,E2 | 较差 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 30.54 | -1.384 | 6.897 | 8.598 | 2.146 | E4 | 不好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 31.85 | 1.237 | 3.589 | 5.948 | 0.849 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 31.03 | 0.415 | 1.882 | 4.422 | 1.391 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 29.97 | -0.638 | 2.480 | 5.254 | 1.496 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 29.60 | -1.014 | 5.055 | 7.596 | 0.263 | E1 | 不好 |
品种 Varieties | 出粉率 Flour yieldrate(%) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 74.72 | 0.476 | 0.453 | 0.901 | 1.234 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 74.63 | 0.378 | 1.304 | 1.530 | 1.285 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 73.89 | -0.358 | 0.869 | 1.261 | 0.644 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 73.75 | -0.497 | 0.094 | 0.415 | 0.837 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 75.17 | 0.608 | 0.036 | 0.252 | 0.985 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 74.63 | 0.066 | 0.323 | 0.762 | 0.545 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 74.39 | -0.170 | 0.124 | 0.474 | 1.030 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 74.06 | -0.503 | 0.411 | 0.866 | 1.440 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 6 Flour yield rate effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 出粉率 Flour yieldrate(%) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 74.72 | 0.476 | 0.453 | 0.901 | 1.234 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 74.63 | 0.378 | 1.304 | 1.530 | 1.285 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 73.89 | -0.358 | 0.869 | 1.261 | 0.644 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 73.75 | -0.497 | 0.094 | 0.415 | 0.837 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 75.17 | 0.608 | 0.036 | 0.252 | 0.985 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 74.63 | 0.066 | 0.323 | 0.762 | 0.545 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 74.39 | -0.170 | 0.124 | 0.474 | 1.030 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 74.06 | -0.503 | 0.411 | 0.866 | 1.440 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
品种 Varieties | 最大阻力 Maximum resistance(EU) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 804.82 | 67.952 | 1 270.728 | 4.429 | 0.869 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 729.58 | -7.285 | 1 846.166 | 5.889 | 0.718 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 709.29 | -27.577 | 1 745.574 | 5.890 | 1.322 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 703.78 | -33.090 | 763.059 | 3.925 | 1.091 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 711.68 | 16.045 | 323.528 | 2.527 | 0.878 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 708.07 | 12.434 | 564.306 | 3.355 | 1.347 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 684.56 | -11.080 | 294.829 | 2.508 | 0.758 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 678.24 | -17.399 | 69.234 | 1.227 | 1.017 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 7 Maximum tensile resistance effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 最大阻力 Maximum resistance(EU) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 804.82 | 67.952 | 1 270.728 | 4.429 | 0.869 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 729.58 | -7.285 | 1 846.166 | 5.889 | 0.718 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 709.29 | -27.577 | 1 745.574 | 5.890 | 1.322 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 703.78 | -33.090 | 763.059 | 3.925 | 1.091 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 711.68 | 16.045 | 323.528 | 2.527 | 0.878 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 708.07 | 12.434 | 564.306 | 3.355 | 1.347 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 684.56 | -11.080 | 294.829 | 2.508 | 0.758 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 678.24 | -17.399 | 69.234 | 1.227 | 1.017 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
品种 Varieties | 延伸度 Extensibility (mm) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 179.57 | 12.095 | 32.204 | 3.160 | 0.873 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 163.70 | -3.779 | 54.397 | 4.506 | 0.591 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春371号 Xinchun37 | 163.60 | -3.870 | 57.979 | 4.654 | 0.873 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 163.03 | -4.447 | 40.373 | 3.898 | 1.664 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 167.35 | 3.430 | 10.366 | 1.924 | 1.530 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 166.00 | 2.083 | 4.597 | 1.292 | 0.955 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 165.00 | 1.083 | 33.995 | 3.534 | 0.363 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 157.32 | -6.597 | 3.714 | 1.225 | 1.153 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 8 Extensibility effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 延伸度 Extensibility (mm) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 179.57 | 12.095 | 32.204 | 3.160 | 0.873 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 163.70 | -3.779 | 54.397 | 4.506 | 0.591 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春371号 Xinchun37 | 163.60 | -3.870 | 57.979 | 4.654 | 0.873 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 163.03 | -4.447 | 40.373 | 3.898 | 1.664 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 167.35 | 3.430 | 10.366 | 1.924 | 1.530 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 166.00 | 2.083 | 4.597 | 1.292 | 0.955 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 165.00 | 1.083 | 33.995 | 3.534 | 0.363 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 157.32 | -6.597 | 3.714 | 1.225 | 1.153 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
品种 Varieties | 拉伸面积 Extension area(cm2) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 147.06 | 20.639 | 116.084 | 7.327 | 0.767 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 123.90 | -2.514 | 183.390 | 10.930 | 0.841 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 118.74 | -7.681 | 62.202 | 6.642 | 1.086 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 115.97 | -10.444 | 47.991 | 5.973 | 1.306 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 118.36 | 6.115 | 21.697 | 3.935 | 1.176 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 116.54 | 4.295 | 42.012 | 5.562 | 0.967 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 112.56 | 0.309 | 16.487 | 3.608 | 0.877 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 101.53 | -10.719 | 61.091 | 7.699 | 0.980 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 9 Tensile area effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 拉伸面积 Extension area(cm2) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 147.06 | 20.639 | 116.084 | 7.327 | 0.767 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 123.90 | -2.514 | 183.390 | 10.930 | 0.841 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 118.74 | -7.681 | 62.202 | 6.642 | 1.086 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 115.97 | -10.444 | 47.991 | 5.973 | 1.306 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 118.36 | 6.115 | 21.697 | 3.935 | 1.176 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 116.54 | 4.295 | 42.012 | 5.562 | 0.967 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 112.56 | 0.309 | 16.487 | 3.608 | 0.877 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 101.53 | -10.719 | 61.091 | 7.699 | 0.980 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
品种 Varieties | 容重 Test weight(g/L) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 797.60 | 5.705 | 67.270 | 1.028 | 0.959 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 793.58 | 1.690 | 34.872 | 0.744 | 0.279 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 788.74 | -3.156 | 19.898 | 0.566 | 1.344 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 787.65 | -4.239 | 24.231 | 0.625 | 1.418 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 799.43 | 3.392 | 84.579 | 1.150 | 0.114 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 797.39 | 1.351 | 27.753 | 0.661 | 1.028 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 794.85 | -1.191 | 42.201 | 0.817 | 2.043 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 792.49 | -3.552 | 3.539 | 0.237 | 0.815 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
Table 10 Test weight effect and stability
品种 Varieties | 容重 Test weight(g/L) | 效应 Effect | 方差 Variance | 变异度 Variability | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 适应地区 Adaptation area | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新春37号 Xinchun37 | 797.60 | 5.705 | 67.270 | 1.028 | 0.959 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春38号 Xinchun38 | 793.58 | 1.690 | 34.872 | 0.744 | 0.279 | E1~E4 | 较好 |
新春26号 Xinchun26 | 788.74 | -3.156 | 19.898 | 0.566 | 1.344 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春44号 Xinchun44 | 787.65 | -4.239 | 24.231 | 0.625 | 1.418 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
新春46号 Xinchun46 | 799.43 | 3.392 | 84.579 | 1.150 | 0.114 | E1~E4 | 很好 |
新春40号 Xinchun40 | 797.39 | 1.351 | 27.753 | 0.661 | 1.028 | E1~E4 | 好 |
新春11号 Xinchun11 | 794.85 | -1.191 | 42.201 | 0.817 | 2.043 | E1~E4 | 一般 |
新春6号 Xinchun6 | 792.49 | -3.552 | 3.539 | 0.237 | 0.815 | E1~E4 | 较差 |
[1] | 吴新元, 芦静, 李冬, 等. 新疆不同类型冬小麦品种品质性状的生态变异[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010,47(2):274-280. |
WU Xinyuan, LU Jing, LI Dong, et al. Variation of different types of grain quality of winter wheat cultivars under different environments in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010,47(2):274-280. | |
[2] | 朱玉平. 江苏省小麦品质性状分析及其分布探讨[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2016,33(3):64-68. |
ZHU Yuping. Assessment of quality properties of wheat varieties planted in Jiangsu province and strategies for improving wheat quality[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2016,33(3):64-68. | |
[3] | 袁建, 鞠兴荣, 汪海峰, 等. 品种及种植地域对小麦主要品质性状影响的研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2000,15(5):54-57. |
YUAN Jian, JU Xingrong, WANG Haifeng, et al. Effects of varieties and planting areas on main quality characters of wheat[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2000,15(5):54-57. | |
[4] | 薛香, 郜庆炉, 杨忠强, 等. 小麦品质性状的主成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(7):38-41. |
XUE Xiang, GAO Qinglu, YANG Zhongqiang, et al. Principal components analysis on major quality traits of winter wheat[J]. Agricultural Bulletin of China, 2011,27(7):38-41. | |
[5] | 李志敏, 董中东, 阎旭霞, 等. 弱筋小麦农艺性状与籽粒蛋白质含量的相关性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007,35(31):9805-9806. |
LI Zhimin, DONG Zhongdong, YAN Xuxia, et al. Relativity analysis of agronomic traits and grain protein content in weak gluten wheat[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2007,35(31):9805-9806. | |
[6] | 吕惠珠, 韩建林, 位国臣, 等. 小麦品质性状间的相关分析[J]. 莱阳农学院学报, 2002,19(4):267-269. |
LÜ Huizhu, HAN Jianlin, WEI Guochen, et al. Correlation analysis of wheat quality traits[J]. Journal of Laiyang Agricultural College, 2002,19(4):267-269. | |
[7] | 郭天财, 张学林, 樊树平, 等. 不同环境条件对三种筋型小麦品质性状的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(6):917-920. |
GU0 Tiancai, ZHANG Xuelin, FAN Shuping, et al. Effects of different environments on qualitative characters of three gluten wheat cultivars[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003,14(6):917-920. | |
[8] | 马冬云, 郭天财, 王晨阳, 等. 用AMMI模型分析小麦品种品质性状的稳定性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,33(4):74-78. |
MA Dongyun, GUO Tiancai, WANG Chenyang, et al. Analyzing the stability of wheat quality traits with AMMI model[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Ed.), 2005,33(4):74-78. | |
[9] | 高欢欢, 李卫华, 穆培源, 等. 新疆春小麦品种品质性状主成分及聚类分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013,50(2):197-203. |
GAO Huanhuan, LI Weihua, MU Peiyuan, et al. Principal components and cluster analyses of Xinjiang spring wheat quality traits[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013,50(2):197-203. | |
[10] | 张向前, 陈欢, 乔玉强, 等. 安徽不同生态区弱筋小麦产量和品质差异分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(12):1763-1771. |
ZHANG Xiangqian, CHEN Huan, QIAO Yuqiang. The Difference in yield and gluten wheat that planting in different ecological areas of Anhui province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2018,27(12):1763-1771. | |
[11] | 赵广才, 万富世, 常旭虹, 等. 强筋小麦产量和蛋白质含量的稳定性及其调控研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(5):895-901. |
ZHAO Guangcai, WAN Fushi, CHANG Xuhong, et al. Study on stability and regulation of grain yield and protein content in strong gluten wheat[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007,40(5):895-901. | |
[12] | 张学林, 郭天财, 朱云集, 等. 追氮时期对不同筋型小麦品质性状的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2006,40(2):113-116. |
ZHANG Xuelin, GUO Tiancai, ZHU Yunji, et al. Effects of nitrogen topdressing stage on quality characters of different kinds of gluten wheat[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2006,40(2):113-116. | |
[13] | 贾辉辉, 冯国华, 刘东涛, 等. 长期定位施肥对不同筋力型小麦品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015,35(6):850-855. |
JIA Huihui, FENG Guohua, LIU Dongtao, et al. Effect of long-term fertilization on quality ofwheat cultivars with different gluten contents[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2015,35(6):850-855. | |
[14] | 樊虎玲, 郝明德, 李志西, 等. 黄土高原旱地化肥和有机肥配施对小麦品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005,23(5):72-76. |
FAN Huling, HAO Mingde, LI Zhixi, et al. Effect of fertilizer and organic fertilizer on wheat quality in dryland of Loess Plateau[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2005,23(5):72-76. | |
[15] | 桑伟, 穆培源, 徐红军, 等. 新疆春小麦品种主要品质性状及其与新疆拉面加工品质的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2008,25(5):772-779. |
SANG Wei, MU Peiyuan, XU Hongjun, et al. Main quality traits of the spring wheat cultivars from xinjiang and their correlations with processing quality of Xinjiang hand—stretched noodle[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2008,25(5):772-779. | |
[16] | 栾姗姗, 贾永红, 王伟, 等. 新疆春小麦品种蛋白质品质性状的变化[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013,22(1):41-47. |
LUAN Shanshan, JIA Yonghong, WANG Wei, et al. The change on protein quality characteristics ofdifferent spring wheat cultivars in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2013,22(1):41-47. | |
[17] | 姚艳荣, 贾秀领, 马瑞崑, 等. 冀中南强筋小麦品种品质性状稳定性差异及地域和气候因子效应[J]. 华北农学报, 2006,21(z2):23-28. |
YAO Yanrong, JIA Xiuling, MA Ruikun, et al. Stability variation and regional climatic impact on quality of high-gluten wheat cultivars in central-south region of Hebei[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2006,21(z2):23-28. | |
[18] | 乔玉强, 马传喜, 司红起, 等. 基因型和环境及其互作效应对小麦品质的影响及品质稳定性分析[J]. 激光生物学报, 2008,17(6):768-774. |
QIAO Yuqiang, MA Chuanxi, SI Hongqi, et al. The effects of genotype,environment and G×E interaction on wheat quality and the analysis of stability[J]. Acta Laser Biology Sinica, 2008,17(6):768-774. | |
[19] | 孙振纲, 许琦. 小麦品质稳定性研究进展[J]. 山西农业科学, 2010,38(12):90-93. |
SUN Zhengang, XU Qi. Study on quality stability in wheat[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010,38(12):90-93. |
[1] | WANG Chunsheng, LI Jianfeng, ZHANG Yueqiang, FAN Zheru, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, XIA Jianqiang, WANG Fangping, ZHAO Qi. Study on genotypic differences of anther culture ability in mainly cultivated spring wheat varieties in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2081-2086. |
[2] | YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[3] | YUAN Yilin, YAN An, ZUO Xiaoxiao, HOU Zhengqing, ZHANG Zhenfei, XIAO Shuting, SUN Zhe, MA Mengqian, ZHAO Yuhang. Impact of reduced nitrogen fertilization combined with bio-organic fertilizer on spring wheat yield enhancement and soil enrichment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882. |
[4] | LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comparative on the vigor differences of spring wheat seeds of different sizes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887. |
[5] | YANG Mei, ZHAO Hongmei, Dilireba Xiamixiding, YANG Weijun, ZHANG Jinshan, HUI Chao. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and biochar application on population structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
[6] | WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao. Evaluation of drought resistance of different Kazakhstan spring wheat at seeding stage under PEG-6000 stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360. |
[7] | ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, SHI Jia, KONG Depeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, LI Jianfeng, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru, ZHANG Yueqiang. Effects of soil moisture on leaf protective enzyme activities and yield of spring wheat cultivars with different drought resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047. |
[8] | Gulinigaer Tuerhong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, ZHANG Lulu, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different priming treatments on seed vigor and physiological characteristics of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 869-877. |
[9] | DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[10] | LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[11] | WANG Xingzhou, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, GENG Hongwei, DING Sunlei, ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362. |
[12] | QU Kejia, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, WANG Xingzhou, GENG Hongwei, DING Sunlei, ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang. Evaluation of drought resistance of introduced spring wheat under PEG treatment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371. |
[13] | LIU Xingyu, YUAN Jianyu, LI Guang, ZHANG Juan, XU Wanheng, ZHANG Xiaxia. Study on Spring Wheat Varieties and Fertilization Optimization in the Loess Plateau of Longzhong [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1398-1405. |
[14] | JIA Yonghong, WEI Haipeng, HOU Dianliang, ZENG Chaowu, Nasirula Keremu, LIANG Xiaodong. Evaluation of correlation between drought resistance and agronomic traits of self-breeding spring wheat varieties in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2940-2948. |
[15] | LUO Xiaoying, FANG Yanfei, SUN Tingting, TANG Jianghua, WANG Luzhen, TANG Tian, WANG Chen, XU Wenxiu. The influence of sowing rate on dry matter sccumulation, grain filling characteristics and yield of dryland spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2704-2711. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||