新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 2168-2182.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.011
• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
张帆1,2(), 陈晓露1, 王洁2, 侯献飞3, 贾东海3, 顾元国3, 苗昊翠1,2(
), 李强3(
)
收稿日期:
2024-02-18
出版日期:
2024-09-20
发布日期:
2024-10-09
通信作者:
苗昊翠(1981-),女,山东青岛人,研究员,研究方向为花生栽培与逆境生理,(E-mail)mc09876@163.com;作者简介:
张帆(1999-),吉林长春人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生物化学与分子生物学,(E-mail)1097427031@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Fan1,2(), CHEN Xiaolu1, WANG Jie2, HOU Xianfei3, JIA Donghai3, GU Yuanguo3, MIAO Haocui1,2(
), LI Qiang3(
)
Received:
2024-02-18
Published:
2024-09-20
Online:
2024-10-09
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究混合盐碱胁迫对花生种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响,为盐碱地的有效利用与耐盐品种的培育提供依据。【方法】以花生品种花育25号为材料,人工模拟混合盐碱胁迫条件,测定花生种子发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数、活力指数、盐害率及花生幼苗的根长和茎长。【结果】(1)高浓度胁迫下,Cl-和SO42-组成的混合盐碱溶液对花生种子萌发产生强抑制效果;当混合盐碱溶液的pH值>10时,对花生种子初生幼苗生长产生强抑制效果;(2)不同浓度的混合盐碱胁迫对发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数、活力指数、盐害率、根长、茎长均产生了不同程度的影响,高浓度的混合盐碱会对花生种子萌发产生抑制作用;(3)花生对各处理的耐盐碱性从大到小依次为B>C>D>E>A。【结论】不同的混合盐碱成分及浓度对花生种子的影响不同,而种子萌发期是植物对盐碱胁迫最敏感的时期。
中图分类号:
张帆, 陈晓露, 王洁, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 顾元国, 苗昊翠, 李强. 混合盐碱胁迫对花生种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182.
ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182.
处理组 Treatment | 盐分组成及摩尔比 Salinity composition and molar ratio | 各盐浓度(mmol/L)处理组对应pH值 Each salt concentration (mmol/L) treatment group corresponds to pH | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NaCl | Na2SO4 | NaHCO3 | Na2 CO3 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 平均 | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 |
A | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.12 | 7.16 | 7.24 | 7.35 | 7.46 | 7.27 |
B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.26 | 8.32 | 8.39 | 8.48 | 8.58 | 8.41 |
C | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9.24 | 9.31 | 9.45 | 9.52 | 9.59 | 9.42 |
D | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10.11 | 10.18 | 10.26 | 10.37 | 10.46 | 10.28 |
E | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11.03 | 11.12 | 11.19 | 11.27 | 11.33 | 11.19 |
表1 各处理组的盐分组成、摩尔比以及相应的pH值
Tab.1 Salinity composition, molar ratio and corresponding pH value of each treatment group
处理组 Treatment | 盐分组成及摩尔比 Salinity composition and molar ratio | 各盐浓度(mmol/L)处理组对应pH值 Each salt concentration (mmol/L) treatment group corresponds to pH | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NaCl | Na2SO4 | NaHCO3 | Na2 CO3 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 平均 | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 |
A | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.12 | 7.16 | 7.24 | 7.35 | 7.46 | 7.27 |
B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.26 | 8.32 | 8.39 | 8.48 | 8.58 | 8.41 |
C | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9.24 | 9.31 | 9.45 | 9.52 | 9.59 | 9.42 |
D | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10.11 | 10.18 | 10.26 | 10.37 | 10.46 | 10.28 |
E | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11.03 | 11.12 | 11.19 | 11.27 | 11.33 | 11.19 |
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatments | 发芽率 Germination rate(%) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
25 | A | 96.67±2.89aA |
B | 96.67±5.77aAB | |
C | 96.67±5.77aA | |
D | 100.00±0.00aA | |
E | 100.00±0.00aA | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
50 | A | 86.67±11.55cA |
B | 96.67±2.89abAB | |
C | 96.67±2.89abA | |
D | 98.33±2.89abA | |
E | 90.00±0.00bcAB | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
100 | A | 51.67±27.54cB |
B | 80.00±5.00abBC | |
C | 68.33±16.07bcB | |
D | 61.67±7.64bcB | |
E | 83.33±10.41abB | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
150 | A | 16.67±15.28cC |
B | 65.00±13.23bC | |
C | 60.00±13.23bB | |
D | 46.67±15.28bC | |
E | 50.00±10.00bC | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
200 | A | 25.00±5.00cdC |
B | 43.33±20.21bD | |
C | 31.67±5.77bcC | |
D | 11.67±5.77dD | |
E | 33.33±2.89bcD |
表2 混合盐碱胁迫下花生种子发芽率的变化
Tab.2 Changes of mixed salt-alkali stress on the germination rate of peanut seeds
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatments | 发芽率 Germination rate(%) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
25 | A | 96.67±2.89aA |
B | 96.67±5.77aAB | |
C | 96.67±5.77aA | |
D | 100.00±0.00aA | |
E | 100.00±0.00aA | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
50 | A | 86.67±11.55cA |
B | 96.67±2.89abAB | |
C | 96.67±2.89abA | |
D | 98.33±2.89abA | |
E | 90.00±0.00bcAB | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
100 | A | 51.67±27.54cB |
B | 80.00±5.00abBC | |
C | 68.33±16.07bcB | |
D | 61.67±7.64bcB | |
E | 83.33±10.41abB | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
150 | A | 16.67±15.28cC |
B | 65.00±13.23bC | |
C | 60.00±13.23bB | |
D | 46.67±15.28bC | |
E | 50.00±10.00bC | |
CK | CK | 100.00±0.00aA |
200 | A | 25.00±5.00cdC |
B | 43.33±20.21bD | |
C | 31.67±5.77bcC | |
D | 11.67±5.77dD | |
E | 33.33±2.89bcD |
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination energy(%) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00cB |
25 | A | 46.67±7.64bA |
B | 38.33±5.77bcB | |
C | 60.00±5.00aA | |
D | 46.67±5.77bB | |
E | 46.67±7.64bB | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00cB |
50 | A | 40.00±5.00cAB |
B | 48.33±5.77bcA | |
C | 58.33±15.28bA | |
D | 81.67±11.55aA | |
E | 43.33±5.77bcBC | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00bBC |
100 | A | 18.33±10.41cC |
B | 38.33±2.89bB | |
C | 36.67±12.58bB | |
D | 36.67±12.58bB | |
E | 58.33±2.89aA | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00aB |
150 | A | 0.00±0.00dD |
B | 35.00±5.00aB | |
C | 20.00±5.00bC | |
D | 8.33±2.89cC | |
E | 21.67±7.64bD | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00aC |
200 | A | 0.00±0.00cD |
B | 8.33±5.77bC | |
C | 1.67±2.89cD | |
D | 1.67±2.89cC | |
E | 3.33±2.89bcE |
表3 混合盐碱胁迫下花生种子发芽势的变化
Tab.3 Changes of mixed salt-alkali stress on the germination energy of peanut seeds
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination energy(%) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00cB |
25 | A | 46.67±7.64bA |
B | 38.33±5.77bcB | |
C | 60.00±5.00aA | |
D | 46.67±5.77bB | |
E | 46.67±7.64bB | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00cB |
50 | A | 40.00±5.00cAB |
B | 48.33±5.77bcA | |
C | 58.33±15.28bA | |
D | 81.67±11.55aA | |
E | 43.33±5.77bcBC | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00bBC |
100 | A | 18.33±10.41cC |
B | 38.33±2.89bB | |
C | 36.67±12.58bB | |
D | 36.67±12.58bB | |
E | 58.33±2.89aA | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00aB |
150 | A | 0.00±0.00dD |
B | 35.00±5.00aB | |
C | 20.00±5.00bC | |
D | 8.33±2.89cC | |
E | 21.67±7.64bD | |
CK | CK | 35.00±0.00aC |
200 | A | 0.00±0.00cD |
B | 8.33±5.77bC | |
C | 1.67±2.89cD | |
D | 1.67±2.89cC | |
E | 3.33±2.89bcE |
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 发芽指数 Germination index |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
25 | A | 7.97±0.79abA |
B | 8.01±0.46abAB | |
C | 7.40±0.71bAB | |
D | 8.18±0.45abA | |
E | 8.19±0.50abA | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
50 | A | 5.54±0.52dB |
B | 7.54±0.41bB | |
C | 7.07±0.43bcB | |
D | 6.46±0.30cB | |
E | 7.34±0.02bB | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
100 | A | 3.06±1.49dC |
B | 5.02±0.24bcC | |
C | 4.08±1.26bcdC | |
D | 3.49±0.64cdC | |
E | 5.23±0.49bC | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
150 | A | 1.07±0.19dD |
B | 3.71±0.66bD | |
C | 3.13±0.72bcC | |
D | 2.21±0.70cD | |
E | 2.77±0.49bcD | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
200 | A | 0.98±0.20cdD |
B | 1.92±0.65bE | |
C | 1.42±0.27bcD | |
D | 0.53±0.19dE | |
E | 1.56±0.26bcE |
表4 混合盐碱胁迫下花生种子发芽指数的变化
Tab.4 Changes of mixed salt-alkali stress on the germination index of peanut seeds
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 发芽指数 Germination index |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
25 | A | 7.97±0.79abA |
B | 8.01±0.46abAB | |
C | 7.40±0.71bAB | |
D | 8.18±0.45abA | |
E | 8.19±0.50abA | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
50 | A | 5.54±0.52dB |
B | 7.54±0.41bB | |
C | 7.07±0.43bcB | |
D | 6.46±0.30cB | |
E | 7.34±0.02bB | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
100 | A | 3.06±1.49dC |
B | 5.02±0.24bcC | |
C | 4.08±1.26bcdC | |
D | 3.49±0.64cdC | |
E | 5.23±0.49bC | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
150 | A | 1.07±0.19dD |
B | 3.71±0.66bD | |
C | 3.13±0.72bcC | |
D | 2.21±0.70cD | |
E | 2.77±0.49bcD | |
CK | CK | 8.57±0.28aA |
200 | A | 0.98±0.20cdD |
B | 1.92±0.65bE | |
C | 1.42±0.27bcD | |
D | 0.53±0.19dE | |
E | 1.56±0.26bcE |
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 活力指数 Vitality index |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08bA |
25 | A | 2.76±0.27abA |
B | 2.57±0.15bcA | |
C | 3.07±0.29aA | |
D | 2.89±0.16abA | |
E | 2.22±0.14cB | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aA |
50 | A | 1.42±0.13cB |
B | 2.45±0.13aA | |
C | 2.20±0.14bC | |
D | 1.56±0.07cC | |
E | 1.39±0.00cC | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aB |
100 | A | 0.49±0.24cdC |
B | 0.84±0.04bB | |
C | 0.62±0.19bcD | |
D | 0.31±0.06dD | |
E | 0.49±0.05cdD | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aB |
150 | A | 0.10±0.02cD |
B | 0.42±0.07bC | |
C | 0.35±0.08bDE | |
D | 0.17±0.05cDE | |
E | 0.14±0.03cE | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aA |
200 | A | 0.11±0.02bcD |
B | 0.13±0.04bD | |
C | 0.12±0.02bE | |
D | 0.04±0.01cE | |
E | 0.11±0.02bE |
表5 混合盐碱胁迫下花生种子活力指数的变化
Tab.5 Changes of mixed salt-alkali stress on the vitality index of peanut seeds
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 活力指数 Vitality index |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08bA |
25 | A | 2.76±0.27abA |
B | 2.57±0.15bcA | |
C | 3.07±0.29aA | |
D | 2.89±0.16abA | |
E | 2.22±0.14cB | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aA |
50 | A | 1.42±0.13cB |
B | 2.45±0.13aA | |
C | 2.20±0.14bC | |
D | 1.56±0.07cC | |
E | 1.39±0.00cC | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aB |
100 | A | 0.49±0.24cdC |
B | 0.84±0.04bB | |
C | 0.62±0.19bcD | |
D | 0.31±0.06dD | |
E | 0.49±0.05cdD | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aB |
150 | A | 0.10±0.02cD |
B | 0.42±0.07bC | |
C | 0.35±0.08bDE | |
D | 0.17±0.05cDE | |
E | 0.14±0.03cE | |
CK | CK | 2.60±0.08aA |
200 | A | 0.11±0.02bcD |
B | 0.13±0.04bD | |
C | 0.12±0.02bE | |
D | 0.04±0.01cE | |
E | 0.11±0.02bE |
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 盐害率 Salt damage rate(%) |
---|---|---|
25 | A | 3.33±2.89aC |
B | 3.33±5.77aC | |
C | 3.33±5.77aC | |
D | 0.00±0.00aC | |
E | 0.00±0.00aD | |
50 | A | 13.33±11.55aC |
B | 3.33±2.89abC | |
C | 3.33±2.89abC | |
D | 1.67±2.89bC | |
E | 10.00±0.00abCD | |
100 | A | 48.33±27.54aB |
B | 20.00±5.00bBC | |
C | 31.67±16.07abB | |
D | 38.33±7.64abB | |
E | 16.67±10.41bC | |
150 | A | 83.33±15.28aA |
B | 35.00±13.23bB | |
C | 40.00±13.23bB | |
D | 53.33±15.28bB | |
E | 50.00±10.00bB | |
200 | A | 75.00±5.00abAB |
B | 56.67±20.21bA | |
C | 68.33±5.77bA | |
D | 88.33±5.77aA | |
E | 66.67±2.89bA |
表6 混合盐碱胁迫下花生种子盐害率的变化
Tab.6 Changes of mixed salt-alkali stress on salt damage rate of peanut seeds
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 盐害率 Salt damage rate(%) |
---|---|---|
25 | A | 3.33±2.89aC |
B | 3.33±5.77aC | |
C | 3.33±5.77aC | |
D | 0.00±0.00aC | |
E | 0.00±0.00aD | |
50 | A | 13.33±11.55aC |
B | 3.33±2.89abC | |
C | 3.33±2.89abC | |
D | 1.67±2.89bC | |
E | 10.00±0.00abCD | |
100 | A | 48.33±27.54aB |
B | 20.00±5.00bBC | |
C | 31.67±16.07abB | |
D | 38.33±7.64abB | |
E | 16.67±10.41bC | |
150 | A | 83.33±15.28aA |
B | 35.00±13.23bB | |
C | 40.00±13.23bB | |
D | 53.33±15.28bB | |
E | 50.00±10.00bB | |
200 | A | 75.00±5.00abAB |
B | 56.67±20.21bA | |
C | 68.33±5.77bA | |
D | 88.33±5.77aA | |
E | 66.67±2.89bA |
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 根长 Root length(cm) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26abA |
25 | A | 34.66±4.49bcA |
B | 34.94±5.86bcA | |
C | 42.26±6.53aA | |
D | 34.46±5.91bcA | |
E | 30.82±5.06cB | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aA |
50 | A | 26.21±3.48bcB |
B | 27.94±4.02bB | |
C | 25.87±3.18bcC | |
D | 22.67±2.52cB | |
E | 16.37±2.35dC | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aB |
100 | A | 17.48±1.91bC |
B | 16.21±3.08bC | |
C | 11.72±2.44cD | |
D | 8.46±1.67cC | |
E | 8.94±2.00cD | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aA |
150 | A | 8.44±3.33bcD |
B | 10.31±1.41bD | |
C | 7.88±1.76bcDE | |
D | 6.04±1.09cC | |
E | 6.50±1.93cD | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aA |
200 | A | 5.93±1.16bD |
B | 6.48±0.91bD | |
C | 6.20±1.16bE | |
D | 4.94±0.76bC | |
E | 5.22±1.14bD |
表7 混合盐碱胁迫下花生根长的变化
Tab.7 Chagnes of mixed salt-alkali stress on peanut root length
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 根长 Root length(cm) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26abA |
25 | A | 34.66±4.49bcA |
B | 34.94±5.86bcA | |
C | 42.26±6.53aA | |
D | 34.46±5.91bcA | |
E | 30.82±5.06cB | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aA |
50 | A | 26.21±3.48bcB |
B | 27.94±4.02bB | |
C | 25.87±3.18bcC | |
D | 22.67±2.52cB | |
E | 16.37±2.35dC | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aB |
100 | A | 17.48±1.91bC |
B | 16.21±3.08bC | |
C | 11.72±2.44cD | |
D | 8.46±1.67cC | |
E | 8.94±2.00cD | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aA |
150 | A | 8.44±3.33bcD |
B | 10.31±1.41bD | |
C | 7.88±1.76bcDE | |
D | 6.04±1.09cC | |
E | 6.50±1.93cD | |
CK | CK | 37.00±9.26aA |
200 | A | 5.93±1.16bD |
B | 6.48±0.91bD | |
C | 6.20±1.16bE | |
D | 4.94±0.76bC | |
E | 5.22±1.14bD |
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 茎长 Stem length(cm) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
25 | A | 13.54±2.68bB |
B | 13.13±3.35bB | |
C | 13.57±3.59bB | |
D | 15.20±3.70abB | |
E | 17.52±4.75aA | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
50 | A | 12.46±0.93bB |
B | 12.05±2.84bB | |
C | 12.54±2.11bB | |
D | 11.62±3.23bC | |
E | 12.15±4.27bB | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
100 | A | 6.35±0.78cdC |
B | 9.25±1.66bC | |
C | 7.69±1.74cC | |
D | 5.77±1.37dD | |
E | 9.59±2.03bB | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
150 | A | 4.94±0.92cCD |
B | 6.89±1.04bD | |
C | 4.49±0.91cD | |
D | 5.41±0.87cD | |
E | 5.63±1.54cC | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
200 | A | 3.74±0.81bD |
B | 4.92±0.57bD | |
C | 4.69±0.43bD | |
D | 0.00±0.00cE | |
E | 0.00±0.00cD |
表8 混合盐碱胁迫下花生茎长的变化
Tab.8 Changes of mixed salt-alkali stress on peanut stem length
盐浓度 Salt concentration(mmol/L) | 处理组 Treatment | 茎长 Stem length(cm) |
---|---|---|
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
25 | A | 13.54±2.68bB |
B | 13.13±3.35bB | |
C | 13.57±3.59bB | |
D | 15.20±3.70abB | |
E | 17.52±4.75aA | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
50 | A | 12.46±0.93bB |
B | 12.05±2.84bB | |
C | 12.54±2.11bB | |
D | 11.62±3.23bC | |
E | 12.15±4.27bB | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
100 | A | 6.35±0.78cdC |
B | 9.25±1.66bC | |
C | 7.69±1.74cC | |
D | 5.77±1.37dD | |
E | 9.59±2.03bB | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
150 | A | 4.94±0.92cCD |
B | 6.89±1.04bD | |
C | 4.49±0.91cD | |
D | 5.41±0.87cD | |
E | 5.63±1.54cC | |
CK | CK | 17.51±1.56aA |
200 | A | 3.74±0.81bD |
B | 4.92±0.57bD | |
C | 4.69±0.43bD | |
D | 0.00±0.00cE | |
E | 0.00±0.00cD |
处理 组 Treat- ment | 发芽率 Germi- nation rate | 发芽势 Germi- nation energy | 发芽指数 Germi- nation index | 活力 指数 Vitality index | 盐害率 Salt damage rate | 根长 Root length | 茎长 Stem length | X1 | X2 | μ1 | μ2 | μ平均值 μ average value | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 55.33 | 21.00 | 3.72 | 0.97 | 44.67 | 18.54 | 9.07 | -1.60 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.36 | 5 |
B | 76.33 | 33.67 | 5.24 | 1.28 | 23.67 | 19.18 | 9.52 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1 |
C | 70.67 | 35.33 | 4.62 | 1.27 | 29.33 | 18.79 | 8.94 | 0.35 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 2 |
D | 63.67 | 35.00 | 4.17 | 0.99 | 36.33 | 15.97 | 10.06 | -0.29 | -0.50 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 3 |
E | 71.33 | 34.67 | 5.02 | 0.87 | 28.67 | 13.92 | 11.73 | 0.61 | -1.48 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 4 |
表9 混合盐碱胁迫下花生的隶属函数值与耐盐碱性综合评价
Tab.9 Membership function values and comprehensive ealuation of salt-alkalinity tolerance in peanuts under mixed Salt-Alkali stress
处理 组 Treat- ment | 发芽率 Germi- nation rate | 发芽势 Germi- nation energy | 发芽指数 Germi- nation index | 活力 指数 Vitality index | 盐害率 Salt damage rate | 根长 Root length | 茎长 Stem length | X1 | X2 | μ1 | μ2 | μ平均值 μ average value | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 55.33 | 21.00 | 3.72 | 0.97 | 44.67 | 18.54 | 9.07 | -1.60 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.36 | 5 |
B | 76.33 | 33.67 | 5.24 | 1.28 | 23.67 | 19.18 | 9.52 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1 |
C | 70.67 | 35.33 | 4.62 | 1.27 | 29.33 | 18.79 | 8.94 | 0.35 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 2 |
D | 63.67 | 35.00 | 4.17 | 0.99 | 36.33 | 15.97 | 10.06 | -0.29 | -0.50 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 3 |
E | 71.33 | 34.67 | 5.02 | 0.87 | 28.67 | 13.92 | 11.73 | 0.61 | -1.48 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 4 |
[1] | 邵华伟, 孙九胜, 胡伟, 等. 新疆盐碱地分布特点和成因及改良利用技术研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2014,(11): 160-164. |
SHAO Huawei, SUN Jiusheng, HU Wei, et al. Research progress on distribution characteristics, causes and improved utilization technology of saline-alkali land in Xinjiang[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014,(11): 160-164. | |
[2] | 朱生堡, 乌尔古丽·托尔逊, 唐光木, 等. 新疆盐碱地变化及其治理措施研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(3): 158-165. |
Zhu ShengBao, Wuerguli Tuoerxun, Tang Guangmu, et al. Research progress on saline-alkali land changes and its treatment measures in Xinjiang[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 55(3): 158-165. | |
[3] | 许盼云, 吴玉霞, 何天明. 植物对盐碱胁迫的适应机理研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2020, 39(10): 41-49. |
XU Panyun, WU Yuxia, HE Tianming. Research progress on adaptation mechanism of plants to saline-alkali stress[J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2020, 39(10): 41-49. | |
[4] | 徐婷, 李锁丞, 王海江, 等. 盐碱胁迫下花生生长及生理特性的研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(6): 866-877. |
XU Ting, LI Suocheng, WANG Haijiang, et al. Study on growth and physiological characteristics of peanut under saline-alkali stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2023, 32(6): 866-877. | |
[5] | 徐婷, 柳延涛, 王海江, 等. 盐碱胁迫对花生种子发芽特性影响及盐害综合鉴定评价[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2022, 44(5): 1037-1047. |
XU Ting, LIU Yantao, WANG Haijiang, et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on germination characteristics of peanut seeds and comprehensive identification and evaluation of salt damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2022, 44(5): 1037-1047. | |
[6] | 范惠玲, 白生文, 朱雪峰, 等. 油菜及其近缘种种子萌发期耐盐碱性差异[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(3): 178-184. |
FAN Huiling, BAI Shengwen, ZHU Xuefeng, et al. Difference of salt-alkaline tolerance of three rape and its two relatives at germination stage[J]. Crops, 2019,(3): 178-184. | |
[7] | 景宇鹏, 连海飞, 李焕春, 等. 玉米耐盐碱能力及评价指标筛选研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(11): 94-104. |
JING Yupeng, LIAN Haifei, LI Huanchun, et al. Study on saline-alkaline tolerance ability and evaluation index selection for corn[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(11): 94-104. | |
[8] | 魏嘉, 蔡勤安, 李源, 等. 植物对盐碱胁迫响应机制的研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(4): 156-164. |
WEI Jia, CAI Qin’an, LI Yuan, et al. Research progress on response mechanism of the plant to saline-alkali stress[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 54(4): 156-164. | |
[9] | 焦明翠, 蔡立格, 魏健. 盐胁迫的生理危害与植物的适应机制研究进展[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2023, 42(6):125-132. |
JIAO Mingcui, CAI Lige, WEI Jian, et al. Research progress on physiological hazards of salt stress and plant adaptation mechanisms[J]. Journal of Changchun Normal University, 2023, 42 (6): 125-132. | |
[10] | 萨如拉, 刘景辉, 刘伟, 等. 碱性盐胁迫对燕麦矿质离子吸收与分配的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(2): 261-266. |
SA Rula, LIU Jinghui, LIU Wei, et al. Effects of alkali salt stress on mineral ion absorption and distribution of oats[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2014, 34(2): 261-266. | |
[11] | 罗达, 吴正保, 史彦江, 等. 盐胁迫对3种平欧杂种榛幼苗叶片解剖结构及离子吸收、运输与分配的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(5):1876-1888. |
LUO Da, WU Zhengbao, SHI Yanjiang, et al. Effects of salt stress on the leaf anatomical structure, ion absorption, transportation, and distribution of three hybrid hazelnut seedlings[J]., 2022, 42(5): 1876-1888. | |
[12] | Shabeer Ahmed, 沈彦合, 马文豪, 等. 3种盐胁迫对玉米幼苗生长及叶片抗氧化酶和离子累积的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(3): 112-117. |
AHMED Shabeer, SHEN Yanhe, MA Wenhao, et al. Effects of three-salt stress on the growth of maize seedlings and the accumulation of antioxidant enzymes and ions in leaves[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(3): 112-117. | |
[13] | 张云鹤, 高大鹏, 王晓蕾, 等. 盐碱胁迫对水稻苗期光系统Ⅱ性能的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(9): 52-60, 92. |
ZHANG Yunhe, GAO Dapeng, WANG Xiaolei, et al. The effects of soil salinity on photosystem Ⅱ of rice seedlings[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2022, 41(9): 52-60, 92. | |
[14] | 金梦野, 李小华, 李昉泽, 等. 盐碱复合胁迫对水稻种子发芽的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(4): 566-574. |
JIN Mengye, LI Xiaohua, LI Fangze, et al. Effects of mixed saline-alkali stress on germination of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(4): 566-574. | |
[15] | 丁富功, 卢奕霏, 康珍, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对油菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 17(3): 73-80, 90, 9. |
DING Fugong, LU Yifei, KANG Zhen, et al. Effects of mixed saline-alkali stress on seed germination and seedling growth of different rape varieties[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 17(3): 73-80, 90, 9. | |
[16] | 纪振冬, 周培禄, 丁小飞, 等. 混合盐胁迫对油菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2023, 29(3): 1-7. |
JI Zhendong, ZHOU Peilu, DING Xiaofei, et al. Effects of complex saline-alkali stress on seed germination of rapeseed (Brassica napus)[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 29(3): 1-7. | |
[17] | 李聪聪, 宋勇, 孙东泉. 不同品种玉米在盐碱复合胁迫下的幼苗生长差异及其生理机制[J/OL]. 生态学杂志:1-11[2023-10-24]. |
LI Congcong, SONG Yong, SUN Dongquan. Differences in seedling growth and physiological mechanisms of different maize varieties under salt alkali complex stress[J/OL]. Journal of Ecology: 1-11 [2023-10-24]. | |
[18] | 黄春琼, 刘国道, 杨虎彪, 等. 17份落花生品系比较试验[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(11): 3819-3828. |
HUANG Chunqiong, LIU Guodao, YANG Hubiao, et al. Comparison test of 17 Arachis Linn.Accessions[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(11): 3819-3828. | |
[19] | 李丽, 崔顺立, 穆国俊, 等. 高油酸花生遗传改良研究进展[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41(6): 986-997. |
LI Li, CUI Shunli, MU Guojun, et al. Research progress of peanut breeding with high oleic acid[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2019, 41(6): 986-997. | |
[20] | 慈敦伟, 张智猛, 丁红, 等. 花生苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(3): 805-814. |
CI Dunwei, ZHANG Zhimeng, DING Hong, et al. Evaluation and selection indices of salinity tolerance in peanut seedling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(3): 805-814. | |
[21] | 苗华荣, 毛瑞喜, 胡晓辉, 等. 花生RIL群体芽期耐盐性初探[J]. 山东农业科学, 2013, 45(8): 33-35. |
MIAO Huarong, MAO Ruixi, HU Xiaohui, et al. Preliminary study on salt tolerance of peanut RIL population at bud stage[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 45(8): 33-35. | |
[22] | 张冠初, 史晓龙, 慈敦伟, 等. 干旱和盐胁迫对花生干物质积累及光合特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(5): 999-1005. |
ZHANG Guanchu, SHI Xiaolong, CI Dunwei, et al. Effect of drought and salt stress on accumulation of plant dry weight and photosynthetic characteristics[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(5): 999-1005. | |
[23] | 梁晓艳, 顾寅钰, 李萌, 等. 盐胁迫下不同耐盐性花生品种形态及生理差异研究[J]. 花生学报, 2018, 47(1): 19-26. |
LIANG Xiaoyan, GU Yinyu, LI Meng, et al. Study on the morphological and physiological differences of different salt tolerant peanut varieties under salt stress[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2018, 47(1): 19-26. | |
[24] | 孙东雷, 卞能飞, 陈志德, 等. 花生萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(6): 1079-1087. |
SUN Donglei, BIAN Nengfei, CHEN Zhide, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) at germination stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(6): 1079-1087. | |
[25] | 闫彩霞, 王娟, 赵小波, 等. 全生育期鉴定筛选耐盐碱花生品种[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 556-565. |
YAN Caixia, WANG Juan, ZHAO Xiaobo, et al. Identification and screening of saline-alkali tolerant peanut cultivars during whole growth stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(3): 556-565. | |
[26] | 杜磊, 雄东毕, 赵海红, 等. 棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性差异研究及种质鉴定[J]. 种子, 2023, 42(2): 59-63. |
DU Lei, XIONG Dongbi, ZHAO Haihong, et al. Research on salt tolerance differences of cotton in germination and seedling stages and germplasm identification[J]. Seed, 2023, 42(2): 59-63. | |
[27] | 胡卉芳, 崔乐乐, 王娟, 等. 老芒麦不同品系种子萌发期耐盐性[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(11): 119-126. |
HU Huifang, CUI Le|Yue( Le|Yue), WANG Juan, et al. Salt tolerance of seeds of different Elymus sibiricus lines at germination stage[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(11): 119-126. | |
[28] | 李娟霞, 白小明, 张翠, 等. 7个野生一年生早熟禾种质萌发期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 2937-2948. |
LI Juanxia, BAI Xiaoming, ZHANG Cui, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of seven wild Poa annua at seed germination stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(11): 2937-2948. | |
[29] | 赵康, 杨涛, 王红刚, 等. 42个新疆海岛棉品种萌发期耐盐性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(5): 27-33. |
ZHAO Kang, YANG Tao, WANG Honggang, et al. Evaluation on salt tolerance of 42 sea-island cotton(Gossypium barbadense)varieties in Xinjiang during germination period[J]. Crops, 2022(5): 27-33. | |
[30] | 胡亮亮, 王素华, 王丽侠, 等. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 367-379. |
HU Liangliang, WANG Suhua, WANG Lixia, et al. Identification of salt tolerance and screening of salt tolerant germplasm of mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) at seedling stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 367-379. | |
[31] | 陈观秀, 周鸿凯, 王盼盼, 等. 幼苗期不同水稻材料应答盐胁迫的生理差异分析[J/OL]. 广西植物:1-12[2023-08-04]. |
CHEN Guanxiu, ZHOU Hongkai, WANG Panpan, et al. Physiological differences in response to salt stress among different rice materials during seedling stage[J/OL]. : 1-12 [2023-08-04]. | |
[32] | 王玉祥, 杜雨, 陈映霞, 等. 盐胁迫对无芒雀麦种子萌发及苗期生理指标的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(5): 139-145. |
Wang Yuxiang, Du Yu, Chen Yingxia, et al. Effects of salt stress on seed germination and seedling physiological indexes of Bromus inermis Leyss[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(5): 139-145. | |
[33] | 赵颖, 魏小红, 赫亚龙, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对藜麦种子萌发和幼苗抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(2): 156-167. |
ZHAO Ying, WEI Xiaohong, HE Yalong, et al. Effects of complex saline-alkali stress on seed germination and seedling antioxidant characteristics of Chenopodium quinoa[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 156-167. | |
[34] | 陆婷, 李英霜, 康健. 混合盐碱胁迫对橡胶草种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(2): 12-15, 19. |
LU Ting, LI Yingshuang, KANG Jian. Effects of salt-alkali mixed stresses on seed germination of Taraxacum kok-saghyz Rodin[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(2): 12-15, 19. | |
[35] | 刘军, 唐敏. 混合盐碱胁迫对大花金鸡菊种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(12): 113-116, 121. |
LIU Jun, TANG Min. Effects of salt-alkaline mixed stress on seed germination of Coreopsis grandiflora[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(12): 113-116, 121. | |
[36] | 朱晓旭, 高玉刚. 混合盐碱胁迫对板蓝根种子萌发的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(6): 147-150. |
ZHU Xiaoxu, GAO Yugang. Effect of mixed saline-alkali stress on seed germination of Isatis indigotica[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(6): 147-150. | |
[37] | 陈雅琦, 苏楷淇, 陈泰祥, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对醉马草种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 137-157. |
CHEN Yaqi, SU Kaiqi, CHEN Taixiang, et al. Effects of complex saline-alkali stress on seed germination and seedling physiological characteristics of Achnatherum inebrians[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 137-157. | |
[38] | 兰艳, 朱林, 王甜甜, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对3种稗属牧草种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(3): 37-44. |
LAN Yan, ZHU Lin, WANG Tiantian, et al. Effects of mixed saline-alkali stress on seed germination of three kinds of Echinochloa grass[J]. Seed, 2022, 41(3): 37-44. | |
[39] | 赵广兴, 李王成, 贾振江, 等. 盐碱复合胁迫对白茎盐生草种子萌发的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(8): 1469-1476. |
ZHAO Guangxing, LI Wangcheng, JIA Zhenjiang, et al. Effects of salt-alkali mixed stresses on the seed germination of Halogeton arachnoideus[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(8): 1469-1476. | |
[40] | 毕春竹, 肖可, 郭子燕, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对不同种源沙枣种子萌发的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021,(16): 89-93. |
BI Chunzhu, XIAO Ke, GUO Ziyan, et al. Effects of mixed saline-alkali stress on germination of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.Seeds from difference provenances[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021,(16): 89-93. | |
[41] | 曲元刚, 赵可夫. NaCl和Na2CO3 对玉米生长和生理胁迫效应的比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(4): 334-341. |
QU Yuangang, ZHAO Kefu. Comparative studies on growth and physiological reaction of Zea mays under NaCl and Na2CO3 stresses[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30(4): 334-341. | |
[42] | 袁锋, 罗倩, 夏心慧, 等. 盐磷胁迫对木麻黄和台湾相思种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2023, 43(4): 587-595. |
YUAN Feng, LUO Qian, XIA Xinhui, et al. Effects of salt and phosphorus stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Casuarina equisetifolia and Acacia confusa[J]. Guihaia, 2023, 43(4): 587-595. | |
[43] | 郭瑞锋, 张永福, 任月梅, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对谷子萌发、幼芽生长的影响及耐盐碱品种筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2017,(4):63-66. |
GUO Ruifeng, ZHANG Yongfu, REN Yuemei, et al. Effects of mixed salt alkali stress on millet germination and young shoot growth and screening of salt alkali tolerant varieties[J]. Crops, 2017,(4): 63-66. | |
[44] | 陆安桥, 张峰举, 许兴, 等. 盐胁迫对湖南稷子苗期生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(5): 84-93. |
LU Anqiao, ZHANG Fengju, XU Xing, et al. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of Echinochloa frumentacea seedlings[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 84-93. |
[1] | 巩雪花, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 乔小燕, 叶晓琴, 郭文超, 丁新华. 新疆绿洲灌区玉米田杂草种子库及环境因子对杂草种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 49-59. |
[2] | 董志多, 徐菲, 付秋萍, 黄建, 祁通, 孟阿静, 付彦博, 开赛尔·库尔班. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844. |
[3] | 李锁丞, 柳延涛, 董红业, 孙振博, 李紫薇, 张春媛, 王开勇, 李强, 杨明凤. 不同施钾量对滴灌花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1926-1936. |
[4] | 奚瑞, 陈怡佳, 李宁, 余庆辉, 王强, 秦勇. 外源2, 4-表芸苔素内酯对盐胁迫下不同盐敏感型番茄种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1983-1992. |
[5] | 高君, 侯献飞, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 汪天玲, 黄奕, 陈晓露, 李强. 棉花-花生轮作模式对花生干物质积累量分配及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1648-1656. |
[6] | 侯献飞, 李强, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 买买提依明·斯马依, 崔福洋. 棉花-花生轮作模式对土壤养分及其产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1657-1665. |
[7] | 刘跃, 贾永红, 张金汕, 于月华, 王润琪, 李丹丹, 石书兵. 滴灌条件下不同高油酸花生品种比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1361-1367. |
[8] | 杨君妍, 闫淼, 吴海波, 杨文莉, 王豪杰, 毛建才, 翟文强, 李俊华. 高温对不同厚皮甜瓜品种种子萌发的影响及其耐热性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1386-1396. |
[9] | 施俊杰, 侯献飞, 于月华, 李强, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 汪天玲. 不同覆盖模式与补充灌溉对花生光合特性及干物质积累速率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1122-1130. |
[10] | 刘易, 李江涛, 江应红, 杨茹薇, 孙慧, 吴燕. NaCl胁迫下外源亚精胺对马铃薯幼苗生理特征的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 336-344. |
[11] | 孙晨, 槐国龙, 王斌, 孙九胜, 杨志莹, 单娜娜. 化肥减量配施黄腐酸对盐渍化土壤养分及花生生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2934-2942. |
[12] | 闫文静, 秦丽欢, 阿丽娅·阿力木, 张大海, 李嘉乐, 李欢, 谢辉. 不同处理对‘吊干’杏种子发芽及幼苗生长特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2976-2986. |
[13] | 周小云, 张军高, 梁晶, 龚静云, 周广威, 张少民, 雷斌. 低温和水分胁迫条件下萎锈灵对棉花种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 3051-3060. |
[14] | 廖彩云, 马贵, 周炎炎, 丁家富, 周悦, 毕可心, 孙蓉, 李有花. 微塑料作用下锌对玉米种子萌发与生长影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2713-2721. |
[15] | 汪天玲, 侯献飞, 施俊杰, 孙全喜, 贾东海, 顾元国, 单世华, 苗昊翠, 李强. 67份匍匐型花生种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 42-54. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 76
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 142
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||