

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 847-854.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.04.008
• 作物遗传育种·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·种质资源 • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:2021-07-13
出版日期:2022-04-20
发布日期:2022-04-24
通信作者:
季良(1963-),男,新疆人,研究员,研究方向为豆类遗传育种,(E-mail) jiliang101@sina.com作者简介:聂石辉(1987-),男,河南人,助理研究员,研究方向为作物遗传育种,(E-mail) 250303063@qq.com
基金资助:
NIE Shihui(
), WANG Xian, PENG Lin, JI Liang(
)
Received:2021-07-13
Published:2022-04-20
Online:2022-04-24
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】运用多年田间试验及种质遗传多样性分析筛选出100份抗旱性表现优异种质为参试材料,结合田间抗旱鉴定构建鹰嘴豆抗旱核心资源库,为鹰嘴豆抗旱种质利用提供基础材料。【方法】比较随机取样、位点优先取样、偏离度取样策略及取样比例,采用均值差异百分率、方差差异百分率、极差符合率以及变异系数变化率评价各核心子集农艺性状的变异保有量,筛选构建抗旱核心库。利用主成分分析确定鹰嘴豆抗旱种质核心库。【结果】采用的位点优先取样方法40%取样比例下构建的核心种质与原种质在多样性上无显著差异。并且检验种质各性状的均值与原种质符合率均大于96.33%,变异系数符合率大于97.25%,优于其它2种取样策略。主成分分析4个主成分包含各质量性状85%以上遗传多样性信息,确定构建的40份核心种质资源能够代表原种质资源遗传多样性。【结论】位点优先取样策略下,40%的取样比例所建立的鹰嘴豆抗旱核心种质资源库可以代表原种质资源的遗传多样性。
中图分类号:
聂石辉, 王仙, 彭琳, 季良. 基于农艺性状鹰嘴豆抗旱核心种质库构建[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 847-854.
NIE Shihui, WANG Xian, PENG Lin, JI Liang. Preliminary Construction of Chickpea Drought Resistance Core Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 847-854.
| 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YZ-1 | 1.132 | YZ-21 | 1.263 | YZ-41 | 1.330 | YZ-61 | 1.419 | YZ-81 | 1.520 |
| YZ-2 | 1.135 | YZ-22 | 1.267 | YZ-42 | 1.334 | YZ-62 | 1.420 | YZ-82 | 1.524 |
| YZ-3 | 1.160 | YZ-23 | 1.267 | YZ-43 | 1.334 | YZ-63 | 1.425 | YZ-83 | 1.525 |
| YZ-4 | 1.182 | YZ-24 | 1.268 | YZ-44 | 1.348 | YZ-64 | 1.425 | YZ-84 | 1.537 |
| YZ-5 | 1.189 | YZ-25 | 1.271 | YZ-45 | 1.351 | YZ-65 | 1.428 | YZ-85 | 1.550 |
| YZ-6 | 1.193 | YZ-26 | 1.272 | YZ-46 | 1.354 | YZ-66 | 1.429 | YZ-86 | 1.556 |
| YZ-7 | 1.195 | YZ-27 | 1.276 | YZ-47 | 1.356 | YZ-67 | 1.442 | YZ-87 | 1.569 |
| YZ-8 | 1.204 | YZ-28 | 1.283 | YZ-48 | 1.360 | YZ-68 | 1.443 | YZ-88 | 1.571 |
| YZ-9 | 1.206 | YZ-29 | 1.284 | YZ-49 | 1.360 | YZ-69 | 1.457 | YZ-89 | 1.574 |
| YZ-10 | 1.208 | YZ-30 | 1.289 | YZ-50 | 1.362 | YZ-70 | 1.461 | YZ-90 | 1.577 |
| YZ-11 | 1.212 | YZ-31 | 1.294 | YZ-51 | 1.362 | YZ-71 | 1.485 | YZ-91 | 1.592 |
| YZ-12 | 1.216 | YZ-32 | 1.299 | YZ-52 | 1.363 | YZ-72 | 1.488 | YZ-92 | 1.592 |
| YZ-13 | 1.235 | YZ-33 | 1.307 | YZ-53 | 1.365 | YZ-73 | 1.493 | YZ-93 | 1.607 |
| YZ-14 | 1.238 | YZ-34 | 1.309 | YZ-54 | 1.379 | YZ-74 | 1.494 | YZ-94 | 1.610 |
| YZ-15 | 1.240 | YZ-35 | 1.311 | YZ-55 | 1.379 | YZ-75 | 1.496 | YZ-95 | 1.626 |
| YZ-16 | 1.247 | YZ-36 | 1.313 | YZ-56 | 1.380 | YZ-76 | 1.500 | YZ-96 | 1.640 |
| YZ-17 | 1.251 | YZ-37 | 1.322 | YZ-57 | 1.381 | YZ-77 | 1.507 | YZ-97 | 1.644 |
| YZ-18 | 1.258 | YZ-38 | 1.324 | YZ-58 | 1.413 | YZ-78 | 1.512 | YZ-98 | 1.646 |
| YZ-19 | 1.259 | YZ-39 | 1.324 | YZ-59 | 1.413 | YZ-79 | 1.513 | YZ-99 | 1.654 |
| YZ-20 | 1.260 | YZ-40 | 1.326 | YZ-60 | 1.415 | YZ-80 | 1.515 | YZ-100 | 1.659 |
表1 参试材料编号及抗旱指数
Table 1 Participating material number and drought resistance index
| 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI | 编号 No. | 抗旱指数 DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YZ-1 | 1.132 | YZ-21 | 1.263 | YZ-41 | 1.330 | YZ-61 | 1.419 | YZ-81 | 1.520 |
| YZ-2 | 1.135 | YZ-22 | 1.267 | YZ-42 | 1.334 | YZ-62 | 1.420 | YZ-82 | 1.524 |
| YZ-3 | 1.160 | YZ-23 | 1.267 | YZ-43 | 1.334 | YZ-63 | 1.425 | YZ-83 | 1.525 |
| YZ-4 | 1.182 | YZ-24 | 1.268 | YZ-44 | 1.348 | YZ-64 | 1.425 | YZ-84 | 1.537 |
| YZ-5 | 1.189 | YZ-25 | 1.271 | YZ-45 | 1.351 | YZ-65 | 1.428 | YZ-85 | 1.550 |
| YZ-6 | 1.193 | YZ-26 | 1.272 | YZ-46 | 1.354 | YZ-66 | 1.429 | YZ-86 | 1.556 |
| YZ-7 | 1.195 | YZ-27 | 1.276 | YZ-47 | 1.356 | YZ-67 | 1.442 | YZ-87 | 1.569 |
| YZ-8 | 1.204 | YZ-28 | 1.283 | YZ-48 | 1.360 | YZ-68 | 1.443 | YZ-88 | 1.571 |
| YZ-9 | 1.206 | YZ-29 | 1.284 | YZ-49 | 1.360 | YZ-69 | 1.457 | YZ-89 | 1.574 |
| YZ-10 | 1.208 | YZ-30 | 1.289 | YZ-50 | 1.362 | YZ-70 | 1.461 | YZ-90 | 1.577 |
| YZ-11 | 1.212 | YZ-31 | 1.294 | YZ-51 | 1.362 | YZ-71 | 1.485 | YZ-91 | 1.592 |
| YZ-12 | 1.216 | YZ-32 | 1.299 | YZ-52 | 1.363 | YZ-72 | 1.488 | YZ-92 | 1.592 |
| YZ-13 | 1.235 | YZ-33 | 1.307 | YZ-53 | 1.365 | YZ-73 | 1.493 | YZ-93 | 1.607 |
| YZ-14 | 1.238 | YZ-34 | 1.309 | YZ-54 | 1.379 | YZ-74 | 1.494 | YZ-94 | 1.610 |
| YZ-15 | 1.240 | YZ-35 | 1.311 | YZ-55 | 1.379 | YZ-75 | 1.496 | YZ-95 | 1.626 |
| YZ-16 | 1.247 | YZ-36 | 1.313 | YZ-56 | 1.380 | YZ-76 | 1.500 | YZ-96 | 1.640 |
| YZ-17 | 1.251 | YZ-37 | 1.322 | YZ-57 | 1.381 | YZ-77 | 1.507 | YZ-97 | 1.644 |
| YZ-18 | 1.258 | YZ-38 | 1.324 | YZ-58 | 1.413 | YZ-78 | 1.512 | YZ-98 | 1.646 |
| YZ-19 | 1.259 | YZ-39 | 1.324 | YZ-59 | 1.413 | YZ-79 | 1.513 | YZ-99 | 1.654 |
| YZ-20 | 1.260 | YZ-40 | 1.326 | YZ-60 | 1.415 | YZ-80 | 1.515 | YZ-100 | 1.659 |
| 性状 Trait | 遗传多样性指数 H' | 频率分布Ratio of distribution | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 株型 Plant type | 0.920 5 | 8 | 22 | 33 | 23 | 14 | - | - |
| 复叶叶型 Compound leaf type | 0.608 5 | 79 | 11 | 10 | - | - | - | - |
| 花色 Flower color | 0.972 7 | 28 | 13 | 11 | 20 | 25 | 2 | 1 |
| 粒型 Seed shape | 0.671 7 | 17 | 69 | 14 | - | - | - | - |
| 粒色 Seed coat color | 0.937 2 | 9 | 45 | 12 | 8 | 15 | 11 | - |
| 种子表面 Seed surface shape | 0.735 4 | 21 | 25 | 54 | - | - | - | - |
表2 鹰嘴豆种质资源6个质量性状的遗传多样性
Table 2 Genetic diversity analysis of six quality traits of chickpea germplasm resources
| 性状 Trait | 遗传多样性指数 H' | 频率分布Ratio of distribution | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 株型 Plant type | 0.920 5 | 8 | 22 | 33 | 23 | 14 | - | - |
| 复叶叶型 Compound leaf type | 0.608 5 | 79 | 11 | 10 | - | - | - | - |
| 花色 Flower color | 0.972 7 | 28 | 13 | 11 | 20 | 25 | 2 | 1 |
| 粒型 Seed shape | 0.671 7 | 17 | 69 | 14 | - | - | - | - |
| 粒色 Seed coat color | 0.937 2 | 9 | 45 | 12 | 8 | 15 | 11 | - |
| 种子表面 Seed surface shape | 0.735 4 | 21 | 25 | 54 | - | - | - | - |
| 性状 Trait | 平均值 Average | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 标准差 s | 极差 Range | 变异系数 CV/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 Plant height ( cm ) | 45.61 | 28.73 | 76.13 | 14.558 | 47.40 | 16.32 |
| 单株一级分枝数 Number of prmary branches | 5.66 | 3.22 | 9.80 | 1.698 | 6.58 | 18.41 |
| 单株荚数 Pods per palnt | 138.64 | 22.26 | 296.45 | 76.911 | 274.19 | 48.80 |
| 每果节荚数 Pods per node | 0.55 | 0.22 | 1.04 | 0.265 | 0.82 | 27.98 |
| 荚长 Pod length ( cm ) | 1.44 | 1.20 | 2.11 | 0.281 | 0.91 | 8.98 |
| 单株粒数 Seeds per plant | 186.20 | 27.86 | 400.19 | 120.657 | 372.33 | 47.30 |
| 单株粒重 Seed yield per plant ( g ) | 36.89 | 8.43 | 76.38 | 21.763 | 67.95 | 40.50 |
| 百粒重 100-seed weight ( g ) | 19.74 | 6.67 | 38.71 | 10.290 | 32.04 | 23.21 |
| 产量 Yield per hectare ( kg/hm2 ) | 2 039.45 | 1 126.65 | 3 561.73 | 56.695 | 2 435.08 | 12.23 |
表3 鹰嘴豆抗旱性相关的9个数量性状值
Table 3 Values of 9 quantitative traits related to drought resistance of chickpeas
| 性状 Trait | 平均值 Average | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 标准差 s | 极差 Range | 变异系数 CV/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 Plant height ( cm ) | 45.61 | 28.73 | 76.13 | 14.558 | 47.40 | 16.32 |
| 单株一级分枝数 Number of prmary branches | 5.66 | 3.22 | 9.80 | 1.698 | 6.58 | 18.41 |
| 单株荚数 Pods per palnt | 138.64 | 22.26 | 296.45 | 76.911 | 274.19 | 48.80 |
| 每果节荚数 Pods per node | 0.55 | 0.22 | 1.04 | 0.265 | 0.82 | 27.98 |
| 荚长 Pod length ( cm ) | 1.44 | 1.20 | 2.11 | 0.281 | 0.91 | 8.98 |
| 单株粒数 Seeds per plant | 186.20 | 27.86 | 400.19 | 120.657 | 372.33 | 47.30 |
| 单株粒重 Seed yield per plant ( g ) | 36.89 | 8.43 | 76.38 | 21.763 | 67.95 | 40.50 |
| 百粒重 100-seed weight ( g ) | 19.74 | 6.67 | 38.71 | 10.290 | 32.04 | 23.21 |
| 产量 Yield per hectare ( kg/hm2 ) | 2 039.45 | 1 126.65 | 3 561.73 | 56.695 | 2 435.08 | 12.23 |
| 因子 Factor | 特征值 Eigen value | 贡献率 Average (%) | 累计贡献率 Accumulating contribution rate(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.232 | 40.590 | 40.590 |
| 2 | 2.733 | 24.214 | 64.804 |
| 3 | 1.194 | 12.467 | 77.271 |
| 4 | 1.040 | 10.221 | 87.492 |
表4 鹰嘴豆抗旱性相关的数量性状主成分
Table 4 Principal component analysis of quantitative traits related to drought resistance of chickpea
| 因子 Factor | 特征值 Eigen value | 贡献率 Average (%) | 累计贡献率 Accumulating contribution rate(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.232 | 40.590 | 40.590 |
| 2 | 2.733 | 24.214 | 64.804 |
| 3 | 1.194 | 12.467 | 77.271 |
| 4 | 1.040 | 10.221 | 87.492 |
| 取样策略 Sampling method | 种质资源库 Germplasm resources bank | 取样比例 Sampling ratio(%) | 均值差异 MD(%) | 方差差异 VD(%) | 变异系数变化 CR(%) | 极差符合率 VR(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 随机取样 Random sampling strategy | R1 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 71 | 89 |
| R2 | 20 | 1 | 18 | 61 | 86 | |
| R3 | 25 | 1 | 15 | 57 | 80 | |
| R4 | 30 | 1 | 13 | 52 | 103 | |
| R5 | 35 | 0 | 24 | 89 | 109 | |
| R6 | 40 | 0 | 17 | 88 | 100 | |
| 位点优先 取样 Allele preferred sampling strategy | S1 | 15 | 1 | 62 | 82 | 37 |
| S2 | 20 | 1 | 71 | 87 | 51 | |
| S3 | 25 | 0 | 76 | 81 | 69 | |
| S4 | 30 | 0 | 82 | 81 | 72 | |
| S5 | 35 | 0 | 77 | 81 | 85 | |
| S6 | 40 | 0 | 101 | 98 | 110 | |
| 偏离度取样 Deviation sampling | D1 | 15 | 1 | 15 | 54 | 88 |
| D2 | 20 | 1 | 18 | 61 | 87 | |
| D3 | 25 | 0 | 18 | 90 | 105 | |
| D4 | 30 | 1 | 13 | 77 | 100 | |
| D5 | 35 | 1 | 12 | 85 | 92 | |
| D6 | 40 | 0 | 17 | 89 | 103 |
表5 不同策略取样的种质资源与原种质性状差异
Table 5 Differences in traits between germplasm resources and original germplasm sampled by different strategies
| 取样策略 Sampling method | 种质资源库 Germplasm resources bank | 取样比例 Sampling ratio(%) | 均值差异 MD(%) | 方差差异 VD(%) | 变异系数变化 CR(%) | 极差符合率 VR(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 随机取样 Random sampling strategy | R1 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 71 | 89 |
| R2 | 20 | 1 | 18 | 61 | 86 | |
| R3 | 25 | 1 | 15 | 57 | 80 | |
| R4 | 30 | 1 | 13 | 52 | 103 | |
| R5 | 35 | 0 | 24 | 89 | 109 | |
| R6 | 40 | 0 | 17 | 88 | 100 | |
| 位点优先 取样 Allele preferred sampling strategy | S1 | 15 | 1 | 62 | 82 | 37 |
| S2 | 20 | 1 | 71 | 87 | 51 | |
| S3 | 25 | 0 | 76 | 81 | 69 | |
| S4 | 30 | 0 | 82 | 81 | 72 | |
| S5 | 35 | 0 | 77 | 81 | 85 | |
| S6 | 40 | 0 | 101 | 98 | 110 | |
| 偏离度取样 Deviation sampling | D1 | 15 | 1 | 15 | 54 | 88 |
| D2 | 20 | 1 | 18 | 61 | 87 | |
| D3 | 25 | 0 | 18 | 90 | 105 | |
| D4 | 30 | 1 | 13 | 77 | 100 | |
| D5 | 35 | 1 | 12 | 85 | 92 | |
| D6 | 40 | 0 | 17 | 89 | 103 |
| 性状 Traits | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation | t值 t-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 原种质 Primary germplasm | 核心种质 Core collection | 符合率 Coincidence Rate(%) | 原种质 Primary germplasm | 核心种质 Core collection | 符合率 Coincidence rate | ||
| 株高 Plant height (cm) | 45.61 | 46.12 | 101.12 | 15.04 | 14.93 | 99.27 | -1.21 |
| 单株一级分枝数 Number of prmary branches | 5.66 | 5.57 | 98.41 | 16.95 | 16.80 | 99.12 | 1.05 |
| 单株荚数 Pods per palnt | 138.64 | 133.55 | 96.33 | 44.95 | 44.87 | 99.82 | 0.96 |
| 每果节荚数 Pods per node | 0.55 | 0.57 | 103.64 | 25.77 | 26.01 | 100.93 | 0.55 |
| 荚长 Pod length (cm) | 1.44 | 1.47 | 102.08 | 8.27 | 8.31 | 100.48 | -0.34 |
| 单株粒数 Seeds per plant | 186.20 | 185.05 | 99.38 | 51.74 | 51.32 | 99.19 | 1.11 |
| 单株粒重 Seed yield per plant (g) | 36.89 | 36.03 | 97.67 | 44.30 | 43.08 | 97.25 | 1.32 |
| 百粒重 100-seed weight (g) | 19.74 | 19.77 | 100.15 | 25.39 | 24.99 | 98.42 | 0.75 |
| 产量 Yield per hectare (kg/hm2) | 2 039.45 | 2 015.14 | 98.81 | 13.38 | 14.11 | 105.46 | 0.83 |
表6 原种质资源与构建的核心种质多样性比较
Table 6 Comparison of original germplasm resources and core germplasm diversity
| 性状 Traits | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation | t值 t-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 原种质 Primary germplasm | 核心种质 Core collection | 符合率 Coincidence Rate(%) | 原种质 Primary germplasm | 核心种质 Core collection | 符合率 Coincidence rate | ||
| 株高 Plant height (cm) | 45.61 | 46.12 | 101.12 | 15.04 | 14.93 | 99.27 | -1.21 |
| 单株一级分枝数 Number of prmary branches | 5.66 | 5.57 | 98.41 | 16.95 | 16.80 | 99.12 | 1.05 |
| 单株荚数 Pods per palnt | 138.64 | 133.55 | 96.33 | 44.95 | 44.87 | 99.82 | 0.96 |
| 每果节荚数 Pods per node | 0.55 | 0.57 | 103.64 | 25.77 | 26.01 | 100.93 | 0.55 |
| 荚长 Pod length (cm) | 1.44 | 1.47 | 102.08 | 8.27 | 8.31 | 100.48 | -0.34 |
| 单株粒数 Seeds per plant | 186.20 | 185.05 | 99.38 | 51.74 | 51.32 | 99.19 | 1.11 |
| 单株粒重 Seed yield per plant (g) | 36.89 | 36.03 | 97.67 | 44.30 | 43.08 | 97.25 | 1.32 |
| 百粒重 100-seed weight (g) | 19.74 | 19.77 | 100.15 | 25.39 | 24.99 | 98.42 | 0.75 |
| 产量 Yield per hectare (kg/hm2) | 2 039.45 | 2 015.14 | 98.81 | 13.38 | 14.11 | 105.46 | 0.83 |
| 因子 Factor | 特征值 Characteristic value | 贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 累计贡献率 Accumulating contribution rate(%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 原种质 | 核心种质 | 原种质 | 核心种质 | 原种质 | 核心种质 | |
| 1 | 4.232 | 4.187 | 40.590 | 39.298 | 40.590 | 39.298 |
| 2 | 2.733 | 2.559 | 24.214 | 23.991 | 64.804 | 63.289 |
| 3 | 1.194 | 1.214 | 12.467 | 12.537 | 77.271 | 75.826 |
| 4 | 1.040 | 1.003 | 10.221 | 9.931 | 87.492 | 85.757 |
表7 鹰嘴豆原种质和构建的核心种质资源的主成分比较
Table 7 Principal component analysis and comparison of chickpea original germplasm and constructed core germplasm
| 因子 Factor | 特征值 Characteristic value | 贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 累计贡献率 Accumulating contribution rate(%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 原种质 | 核心种质 | 原种质 | 核心种质 | 原种质 | 核心种质 | |
| 1 | 4.232 | 4.187 | 40.590 | 39.298 | 40.590 | 39.298 |
| 2 | 2.733 | 2.559 | 24.214 | 23.991 | 64.804 | 63.289 |
| 3 | 1.194 | 1.214 | 12.467 | 12.537 | 77.271 | 75.826 |
| 4 | 1.040 | 1.003 | 10.221 | 9.931 | 87.492 | 85.757 |
| [1] | Frankel O H. Genetic Perspectives of Germplasm Conservation[M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1984: 161-170. |
| [2] |
Abadie T, Cordeiro C, Fonseca J R, et al. Constructing a rice core collection for Brazil[J]. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 2005, 40(2):129-136.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Ebana K, Kojima Y, Fukuoka S, et al. Development of mini core collection of Japanese rice landrace[J]. Breeding Science, 2008, 58(3):281-291.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Hao C Y, Zhang X Y, Wang L F, et al. Genetic diversity and core collection evaluations in common wheat germplasm from the northwestern spring wheat region in china[J]. Molecular Breeding. 2006, 17(1):69-77.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
ZeuliP L S, Qualset C O. Evaluation of 5 strategies for obtaining a core subset from a large genetic resource collection of durum wheat[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1993, 87(3):295-304.
DOI PMID |
| [6] |
Kuroda Y, Tomooka N, Kaga A, et al. Genetic diversity of wild soybean (glycine sojasieb. Etzucc.) And Japanese cultivatedsoybeans [g. Max (1.) Merr.] Based on microsatellite (ssr) analysis and the selection of a core collection[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2009, 56(8):1045-1055
DOI URL |
| [7] | 钱玉源, 刘祎, 崔淑芳, 等. 基于表型的棉花种质资源遗传多样性分析及核心种质的抽提[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(增刊):29-35. |
| QIAN Yuyuan, LIU Yi, CUI Shufang, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity of cotton germplasm resources and extraction of core germplasm based on phenotypic traits[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(Sup):29-35. | |
| [8] | 代攀虹, 孙君灵, 贾银华, 等. 利用表型数据构建陆地棉核心种质[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(6):961-968. |
| DAI Panhong, SUN Junling, JIA Yinhua, et al. Construction of Core Collection of Upland Cotton based on Phenotypic Data[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(6):961-968. | |
| [9] |
Rodino A P, Santalla M, MAD Ron, et al. A core collection of common bean from the Iberian peninsula[J]. Euphytica, 2003, 131(2):165-175.
DOI URL |
| [10] | 郝晓鹏, 王燕, 田翔, 等. 基于农艺性状的山西普通菜豆初级核心种质构建[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(5):815-823. |
| HAO Xiaopeng, WANG Yan, TIAN Xiang, et al. Construction of primary core collection of common bean (phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on agronomic traits in Shanxi Province[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(5):815-823. | |
| [11] |
Igartua E, Gracia M P, Lasa J M, et al. The spanish barley core collection a-8701-2011[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 1998, 45(5):475-481.
DOI URL |
| [12] | 胥婷婷, 林峰, 华为, 等. Establishment of core collection on bred cultivars of Chinese barley[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 023(3):483-488. |
| XU Tingting, LIN Feng, HUA Wei, et al. Establishment of core collection on bred cultivars of Chinese barley[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(3):483-488. | |
| [13] | 董玉琛. 我国作物种质资源研究的现状与展望[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 1999, (2):36-40. |
| DONG Yuchen. Today and tomorrow of crop germplasm resources in China[J]. Review of China Agricultural Science and Technology, 1999(2):36-40. | |
| [14] | 黄璐琦, 吕冬梅, 杨滨, 等. 药用植物种质资源研究的发展-核心种质的构建[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2005, 30(20):5-8. |
| HUANG Luqi, LV Dongmei, YANG Bin, et al. Development of the study on germplasm resources of medicinal plants: construction of core collection[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2005, 30(20):5-8. | |
| [15] | 卜海东, 张冰冰. 果树核心种质研宄进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2010, (4):211-213. |
| BU Haidong, ZHANG Bingbing. Advances in research on core collection of fruit tree germplasm resources[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010, (4):211-213. | |
| [16] | 王文强. 牧草遗传资源核心种质及其构建[J]. 热带农业科学, 2010, 30(1):10-14. |
| WANG Wenqiang. Core collection of pasturage germplasm resources and its establishment[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2010, 30(1):10-14. | |
| [17] | 张艳欣, 张秀荣, 孙建. 油料作物种质资源核心收集品研宄进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2009, 10(1):152-157. |
| ZHANG Yanxin, ZHANG Xiurong, SUN Jian. Advances in research on core collection of oil crop germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2009, 10(1):152-157. | |
| [18] | 戴茂华, 刘丽英, 郑书宏, 等. 陆地棉主要农艺性状的相关性及聚类分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(12):139-144. |
| DAI Maohua, LIU Liying, ZHENG Shuhong, et al. Correlation and cluster analysis for main agronomic characters of upland cotton[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(12):139-144. | |
| [19] | 刘金, 关建平, 徐东旭, 等. 小扁豆种质资源形态标记遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2008, 9(2):173-179. |
| LIU Jin, GUAN Jianping, XU Dongxu, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Lentil (Lens culinarisMedik.) germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2008, 9(2):173-179. | |
| [20] |
胡建斌, 马双武, 李建吾, 等. 国外甜瓜种质资源形态性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物学报, 2013, 48(1):42-51.
DOI |
|
HU Jianbin, MA Shuangwu, LI Jianwu, et al. Genetic diversity of foreign Melon (Cucumismelo) germplasm resources by morphological characters[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2013, 48(1):42-51.
DOI URL |
|
| [21] | 邱丽娟, 李英慧, 关荣霞, 等. 大豆核心种质和微核心种质的构建、验证与研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(4):571-579. |
|
QIU Lijuan, LI Yinghui, GUAN Rongxia, et al. Establishment, representative testing and research progress of soybean core collection and mini core collection[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(4):571-579.
DOI URL |
|
| [22] | 王海飞, 关建平, 孙雪莲, 等. 世界蚕豆种质资源遗传多样性和相似性的ISSR分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(5):1056-1062. |
| WANG Haifei, GUAN Jianping, SUN Xuelian, et al. Genetic diversity and similarity of global Faba Bean (Vciafaba L.) germplasm revealed by ISSR markers[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(5):1056-1062. | |
| [23] | 王丽侠, 程须珍, 王素华, 等. 中国绿豆应用型核心样本农艺性状的分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2009, 10(4):589-593. |
| WANG Lixia, CHENG Xuzhen, WANG Suhua, et al. Genetic variability of agronomic traits in Mungbean applied core collection of China[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2009, 10(4):589-593. | |
| [24] | Hodgkin T, Arora R K, Riley K W. Core collection and conservation of genetic resources[M]. New Delhi, India, 1994. |
| [1] | 曾婉盈, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤, 李思忠, 钱松廷, 高卫时, 张立明. 甜菜品系叶丛快速生长期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
| [2] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
| [3] | 陈勇, 周蕾, 隋春, 蔺彩霞. 32份板蓝根栽培种质在新疆产区的性状表现[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314. |
| [4] | 李金瑶, 徐贵青, 王立生, 吕平, 石东方, 郑伟华. 氮肥对头状沙拐枣幼苗抗旱性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2330-2340. |
| [5] | 苗雨, 陈翠霞, 马艳明, 邢国芳, 董裕生, 陈智军, 王仙, 向莉. 276份中亚大麦种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895. |
| [6] | 李颖, 郭文文, 李江博, 曲延英, 陈全家, 郑凯. 90份转BT基因抗虫棉品种(系)在新疆早熟棉区的适应性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1561-1573. |
| [7] | 叶萍毅, 龙遗磊, 谭彦平, 杜霄, 安梦洁, 陶志鑫, 梁发瑞, 艾先涛, 胡守林. 陆地棉果枝夹角与机采农艺性状鉴定评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1318-1327. |
| [8] | 王一钊, 杨其志, 刘玉秀, 阿拉依·努尔卡马力, Vladimir Shvidchenko, 张正茂. PEG胁迫下评价哈萨克斯坦不同春小麦种质苗期的抗旱性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360. |
| [9] | 刘跃, 贾永红, 张金汕, 于月华, 王润琪, 李丹丹, 石书兵. 滴灌条件下不同高油酸花生品种比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1361-1367. |
| [10] | 张宏芝, 王立红, 时佳, 孔德鹏, 王重, 高新, 李剑峰, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒, 张跃强. 土壤水分对不同抗旱性春小麦品种叶片保护性酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047. |
| [11] | 董祯林, 万素梅, 熊世武, 马云珍, 毛廷勇, 杨北方, 骆磊, 刘超群, 陈国栋, 李亚兵. 不同种植密度对中棉113农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1102-1111. |
| [12] | 杨璐, 王娜, 范少丽, 程平, 李宏, 汪阳东. 黑桑种质资源表型性状变异特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1172-1181. |
| [13] | 代元帅, 鲁为华, 申磊, 王秀媛, 张文龙, 张伟. 林草复合系统中杨树-紫花苜蓿间作对苜蓿生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1182-1189. |
| [14] | 张国儒, 唐亚萍, 石林媛, 袁雷, 张勇, 杨生保. 辣椒种间杂交遗传特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 632-641. |
| [15] | 杨祥波, 陈亮宇, 杨松楠, 陈喜凤, 邢伟明, 李雪莹, 丛炜轩, 臧振原, 臧远波, 张君. 东北春大豆种质资源表型分析及综合性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2921-2933. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||