苦豆子浸提液对哈密瓜种子萌发的化感效应

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究苦豆子浸提液对哈密瓜种子萌发化感效应的影响。【方法】分析比较2年、7年哈密瓜连作年限土壤浸提液以及不同浓度苦豆子浸提液(5、25和50 g/L)对哈密瓜种子萌发的交互影响。通过培养皿滤纸法,统计种子发芽势、发芽率、发芽指数以及化感效应指数。【结果】连作土壤浸提液可显著抑制哈密瓜种子的萌发,其种子发芽率分别降低了30.56%,41.67%。在不同浓度苦豆子浸提液处理下,哈密瓜种子发芽率降低了19.44%~61.11%。在土壤浸提液与苦豆子浸提液的交互试验中,苦豆子浸提液加剧了2年哈密瓜连作土壤浸提液的种子萌发抑制效应;但5 g/L的苦豆子浸提液却可以显著消减7年哈密瓜连作土壤浸提液的种子萌发抑制效应。【结论】低浓度的苦豆子浸提液(5 g/L)可以消减哈密瓜长期连作带来的种子萌发化感效应。

关键词: 化感效应; 连作障碍; 种子萌发; 哈密瓜; 苦豆子

Abstract:

【Objective】To clarify the impact of Sophora alopecuroides L. extracts on allelopathy of Hami melon seed germination by investigating the interactive effects of soil extracts (continuous cropping for 2 years and 7 years) and different concentrations of Sophora alopecuroides L. (5, 25 and 50 g/L) on the seed germination of Hami melon.【Methods】The germination potential, germination rate, germination index, and allelopathy response index of the Hami melon seeds were determined using the filter paper method in Petri dishes.【Results】The continuous cropping soil extracts significantly inhibited the seed germination rate, with a decrement in germination rate of 30.56% and 41.67% respectively. Similarly, Hami melon seed germination rate decreased by 19.44%-61.11% after treatment of Sophora alopecuroides L. water extracts. However, further findings from the interaction effects of continuous cropping soil extracts and Sophora alopecuroides L. extracts on seed germination indicated that low concentration of Sophora alopecuroides L. extracts (5g/L) could clearly reduce the long-term continuous cropping barrier effect of Hami melon (7 years) compared to 2 years. 【Conclusion】Low concentration of Sophora alopecuroides L. (5 g/L) might mitigate the seed germination allelopathy caused by long-term continuous cropping of Hami melon.

Key words: allelopathy; continuous cropping obstacle; seed germination; Hami melon; Sophora alopecuroides L.

中图分类号:

S652

盛杨倩, 周嘉琦, 黄杨捷, 张美琪, 薛娜娜. 苦豆子浸提液对哈密瓜种子萌发的化感效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 732-738.

SHENG Yangqian, ZHOU Jiaqi, HUANG Yangjie, ZHANG Meiqi, XUE Nana. Effects of Sophora alopecuroides L. extracts on allelopathy of Hami melon seed germination[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 732-738.

图/表 6

参考文献 30

[1]	刘垠霖, 蔡立群, 赵瑞, 等. 吐鲁番哈密瓜土壤养分及酶活性对连作年限的响应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(1): 273-281.
	LIU Yinlin, CAI Liqun, ZHAO Rui, et al. Response of soil nutrient and enzyme activity to continuous cropping years of Turpan Hami melon[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021,(1): 273-281.
[2]	原静云, 王晓玲, 王文英, 等. 不同连作年限对甜瓜土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 种业导刊, 2021,(3): 40-43.
	YUAN Jingyun, WANG Xiaoling, WANG Wenying, et al. Effect of continuous cropping year on soil physical and chemical properties of melon[J]. Journal of Seed Industry Guide, 2021,(3): 40-43.
[3]	王叶青, 刘芳, 潘纪源, 等. 巨大芽孢杆菌与噁霉灵联用对甜瓜连作障碍的缓解效果[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(4): 762-770.
	WANG Yeqing, LIU Fang, PAN Jiyuan, et al. Effects of combination of hymexazol and Bacillus megaterium on Fusarium wilt of continuous cropping melon(Cucumis sativus L.)[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2022, 24(4): 762-770.
[4]	吴凤芝, 赵凤艳, 马凤鸣. 酚酸物质及其化感作用[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2001, 32(4): 402-407.
	WU Fengzhi, ZHAO Fengyan, MA Fengming. Phenolic acid substances and allelopathy mechanisms[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2001, 32(4): 402-407.
[5]	张子龙, 王文全. 植物连作障碍的形成机制及其调控技术研究进展[J]. 生物学杂志, 2010, 27(5): 69-72.
	ZHANG Zilong, WANG Wenquan. Progress on formation mechanism and control measurements of continuous cropping obstacles in plants[J]. Journal of Biology, 2010, 27(5): 69-72.
[6]	张璐, 杨瑞秀, 王莹, 等. 甜瓜连作土壤中酚酸类物质测定及降解研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(9): 18-23.
	ZHANG Lu, YANG Ruixiu, WANG Ying, et al. Identification and degradation of phenolic acids in rhizosphere soil of replanted muskmelon[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(9): 18-23.
[7]	杨瑞秀, 高增贵, 姚远, 等. 甜瓜根系分泌物中酚酸物质对尖孢镰孢菌的化感效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(8): 2355-2360.
	YANG Ruixiu, GAO Zenggui, YAO Yuan, et al. Allelopathic effects of phenolic compounds of melon root exudates on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(8): 2355-2360. PMID
[8]	Zhang Z Z, Zhang Z D, Han X Y, et al. Specific response mechanism to autotoxicity in melon (Cucumis melo L.) root revealed by physiological analyses combined with transcriptome profiling[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 200: 110779.
[9]	Zhang Z Z, Wu J H, Xi Y P, et al. Effects of autotoxicity on seed germination, gas exchange attributes and chlorophyll fluorescence in melon seedlings[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 41(3): 993-1003.
[10]	吕笃康, 巴音山, 刘影, 等. 苦豆子浸出液对高羊茅种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49(8): 1477-1482.
	LYU Dukang, BA Yinshan, LIU Ying, et al. The effect of aqueous extract from Sophora alopecuroides seed on germination and seedling growth of Festuca arundinacea[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 49(8): 1477-1482.
[11]	麦麦提艾则孜·穆合塔尔, 王东. 苦豆子浸提液对“比斜克其” 甜瓜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2021, 41(3): 57-60, 67.
	Maimaitiaizezi Muhetaer, WANG Dong. Effects of different Sophora alopecuroides treatments on seed germination and seedling growth of “bixiekeqi” melon[J]. China Fruit & Vegetable, 2021, 41(3): 57-60, 67.
[12]	周立彪, 闫兴富, 石淳, 等. 苦豆子浸提物对老瓜头种子萌发的化感作用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011, 39(5): 499-501.
	ZHOU Libiao, YAN Xingfu, SHI Chun, et al. Allelopathy of Sophora alopecuroides extract on seed germination of old melon head[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(5): 499-501.
[13]	王立光, 叶春雷, 陈军, 等. 轮作小麦消减胡麻连作障碍的效应研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(2): 158-163, 184.
	WANG Liguang, YE Chunlei, CHEN Jun, et al. The effect of rotation wheat on reducing continuous cropping obstacle of oil flax[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(2): 158-163, 184.
[14]	石国庆, 隋晓青, 杨静, 等. 苦豆子根、茎、叶浸提液对4种牧草种子萌发的化感作用[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2223-2230. DOI
	SHI Guoqing, SUI Xiaoqing, YANG Jing, et al. Allelopathic effects of extracts from roots, stems and leaves of Sophora alopecuroides on seed germination of four forage species[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2223-2230. DOI
[15]	曾任森. 化感作用研究中的生物测定方法综述[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(1): 123-126.
	ZENG Rensen. Review on bioassay methods for allelopathy research[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(1): 123-126.
[16]	Bruce Williamson G, Richardson D. Bioassays for allelopathy: Measuring treatment responses with independent controls[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1988, 14(1): 181-187. DOI PMID
[17]	刘军, 温学森, 郎爱东. 植物根系分泌物成分及其作用的研究进展[J]. 食品与药品, 2007, 9(3): 63-65.
	LIU Jun, WEN Xuesen, LANG Aidong. Progress in components and effects of plant root exudates[J]. Food and Drug, 2007, 9(3): 63-65.
[18]	林超, 邱黛玉, 陈垣, 等. 党参根际土壤浸提液对其种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(4): 900-906.
	LIN Chao, QIU Daiyu, CHEN Yuan, et al. Effects of aqueous extracts from rhizosphere soil of Codonopsis pilosula on seed germination and seedling growth[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 38(4): 900-906.
[19]	齐晓晨, 赵库, 叶祖鹏, 等. 苦豆子绿肥对甜瓜生长及营养特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(6): 104-112. DOI
	QI Xiaochen, ZHAO Ku, YE Zupeng, et al. Effects of Sophora alopecuroides green manure on growth and nutrient characteristics of melon[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 104-112.
[20]	陈波浪, 柴仲平, 吴海华, 等. 施用绿肥(苦豆子鲜草)对立架甜瓜土壤速效养分与产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015,(5): 94-98.
	CHEN Bolang, CHAI Zhongping, WU Haihua, et al. Influence on soil available nutrients and yield of trellis-cultivated melon with green Manure(Sophora alopecuroides)[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015,(5): 94-98.
[21]	顾沛雯, 郝丽, 徐润, 等. 宁夏白芨滩自然保护区苦豆子内生真菌的区系组成及其抑菌活性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(5): 209-216.
	GU Peiwen, HAO Li, XU Run, et al. Diversity and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi in Sophora alopecuroides L. from Baijitan National Nature Reserve of Ningxia[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(5): 209-216.
[22]	龚明福, 林世利, 马玉红, 等. 拮抗棉花枯萎病菌的苦豆子内生细菌资源[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2009, 46(3): 531-535.
	GONG Mingfu, LIN Shili, MA Yuhong, et al. Endophytic bacteria resources isolated from Sophora alopecuroides antagonised to Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 46(3): 531-535.
[23]	田敬宇, 高雁, 高兴旺, 等. 哈密瓜种植对根际土壤细菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262. DOI
	TIAN Jingyu, GAO Yan, GAO Xingwang, et al. Analysis of rhizospheric bacterial community structure and diversity of Hami melon under field cultivation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262. DOI
[24]	王素娜. 轮作缓解甜瓜连作障碍的机理研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017.
	WANG Suna. Study on mechanism of mitigating continuous cropping obstacles of melon by rotation[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2017.
[25]	杨永, 张学军, 李寐华, 等. 微生物肥料对设施长期连作哈密瓜根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(1): 68-74.
	YANG Yong, ZHANG Xuejun, LI Meihua, et al. Effects of microbiological fertilizer on rhizosphere soil fungus communities under long-term continuous cropping of protected Hami melon[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018, 24(1): 68-74.
[26]	马阳, 郑卫红, 张培, 等. 不同调控措施对甜瓜土壤性质、细菌多样性和产量的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2022, 45(1): 48-54.
	MA Yang, ZHENG Weihong, ZHANG Pei, et al. Effects of different control measures on soil properties, bacterial diversity and yield of muskmelon[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2022, 45(1): 48-54.
[27]	马慧, 杨瑞秀, 盖晓彤, 等. 不同土壤处理剂对甜瓜连作障碍的修复作用[J]. 农药, 2018, 57(10): 764-767.
	MA Hui, YANG Ruixiu, GAI Xiaotong, et al. Alleviating of muskmelon soil of continuous cropping obstacles by different soil treatment agent[J]. Agrochemicals, 2018, 57(10): 764-767.
[28]	李世豪, 陈宁, 林松, 等. 苦参碱调控作物连作障碍应用前景[J]. 广西植保, 2020, 33(4): 24-29.
	LI Shihao, CHEN Ning, LIN Song, et al. Application prospect of Matrine to regulate the continuous cropping obstacle[J]. Guangxi Plant Protection, 2020, 33(4): 24-29.
[29]	陶诗清, 吴先琪. 苦豆子的抗生成分[J]. 生态学报, 1985, 5(1): 7-14.
	TAO Shiqing, WU Xianqi. Growth inhibitors produced by Sophora alopecuroides l[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1985, 5(1): 7-14.
[30]	史芳芸, 邱明宁, 李国中, 等. 苦豆子资源现状、化学成分、毒性及其开发利用研究进展[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2019,(13): 34-38.
	SHI Fangyun, QIU Mingning, LI Guozhong, et al. Research progress on the resource status, chemical composition, toxicity, exploitation and utilization of Sophora alopecuroides[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2019,(13): 34-38.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	11	0	0	12

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	14	9
比例	61%	39%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	68

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	28	41
比例	41%	59%

处理 Treat- ments	发芽势 Germination potential (%)	发芽率 Germination (%)	发芽指数 Germination indexes
CK	65.00±2.89^a	90.00±4.08^a	1.29±0.06^a
T₁	47.50±7.50^b	62.50±6.29^b	0.89±0.09^b
T₂	37.50±2.50^b	52.50±6.29^b	0.75±0.09^b

处理 Treat- ments	发芽势 Germination potential (%)	发芽率 Germination (%)	发芽指数 Germination indexes
CK	65.00±2.89^a	90.00±4.08^a	1.29±0.06^a
T₁	47.50±7.50^b	62.50±6.29^b	0.89±0.09^b
T₂	37.50±2.50^b	52.50±6.29^b	0.75±0.09^b

处理 Treat- ments	发芽势 Germination potential (%)	发芽率 Germination (%)	发芽指数 Germination indexes
CK	65.00±2.89^a	90.00±4.08^a	1.29±0.06^a
T₃	35.00±6.45^b	42.50±4.79^c	0.61±0.07^c
T₄	35.00±9.57^b	72.50±6.29^b	1.04±0.09^b
T₅	32.50±4.79^b	35.00±2.89^c	0.50±0.04^c

处理 Treat- ments	发芽势 Germination potential (%)	发芽率 Germination (%)	发芽指数 Germination indexes
CK	65.00±2.89^a	90.00±4.08^a	1.29±0.06^a
T₃	35.00±6.45^b	42.50±4.79^c	0.61±0.07^c
T₄	35.00±9.57^b	72.50±6.29^b	1.04±0.09^b
T₅	32.50±4.79^b	35.00±2.89^c	0.50±0.04^c

处理 Treat- ments	发芽势 Germination potential (%)	发芽率 Germination (%)	发芽指数 Germination indexes
CK	65.00±2.89^a	90.00±4.08^a	1.29±0.06^a
T₆	30.00±4.08^b	32.50±2.50^b	0.46±0.04^b
T₇	22.50±4.79^b	25.00±5.00^b	0.36±0.07^b
T₈	15.00±6.45^b	20.00±4.08^b	0.29±0.06^b