不同光质配比对水培牧草大麦生长的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.007

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 1871-1876.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.007

• 作物遗传育种·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同光质配比对水培牧草大麦生长的影响

杨金钰(), 孙九胜(), 乔小燕, 槐国龙

新疆农业科学院土壤肥料与农业节水研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2021-10-22 出版日期:2022-08-20 发布日期:2022-10-01
通信作者: 孙九胜（1969–）,男,新疆喀什人,研究员,研究方向为农业资源环境利用,（E-mail） 2436405336@qq.com.
作者简介:杨金钰（1981–）,女,山东人,副研究员,研究方向为农业资源利用,（E-mail） 122359019@qq.com.
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划“全可控环境条件下水培牧草高效生产技术引进试验与示范”(2016YFE0109100)

Effects of Different Light Quality Ratios on the Growth of Hydroponic Forage Barley

YANG Jinyu(), SUN Jiusheng(), QIAO Xiaoyan, HUAI Guolong

Research Institute of Soil, Fertilizer and Agricultural Water Conservation, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2021-10-22 Published:2022-08-20 Online:2022-10-01
Correspondence author: SUN Jiusheng（1969- ）,male,native place： Kashi,Xinjiang. Researcher, research field： agricultural resources and environment, achievement transformation,（E-mail） 2436405336@qq.com
Supported by:
National Key R & D Program Project of China “ Introduction and Demonstration of High Efficiency Production Technology of Hydroponic Forage under Fully Controllable Environment ”(2016YFE0109100)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同红蓝光配比对水培大麦生长的影响,分析合适的光质。【方法】以水培牧草大麦为研究对象,分别用LED白光、LED蓝光及LED红蓝光配合进行处理,测定一个生长周期下大麦的株高、根长、鲜草产量、干草产量。【结果】不同光照条件下,大麦的生长表现出显著差异。在白光照射条件下,大麦株高为8.92 cm,显著高于其他2个处理。蓝光处理的大麦株高最低,为6.62 cm,显著低于其他两个处理;蓝光照射下,大麦的根长最长,为10.42 cm,显著高于其他两个处理。蓝光和红蓝光配合处理间的鲜草、干草生物量差异不显著,显著高于白光处理的生物量。【结论】人工光水培条件下,LED白光促进大麦植株上部分茎的伸长,株高增大,而鲜重和干重及下部分的根系生长受抑制。LED蓝光可促进大麦下部分根的生长发育和生物量的累积,株高伸长受限。红蓝光LED组合处理可促进大麦生物量的增加,是水培方式下培育大麦牧草采用的光质。

关键词: 大麦; 水培; LED光源; 光质; 生物量

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of different red and blue light ratios on the growth of hydroponic barley and determine the appropriate photoplasm. 【Methods】 Hydroponic forage barley was taken as the research object, the plant height, root length, fresh grass yield and dry grass yield of barley in one growth cycle were measured by LED white light, LED blue light and LED red blue light.【Result】The results showed that there were significant differences in the growth of barley under different light conditions. Under the condition of white light, the plant height of barley was 8.92 cm, which was significantly higher than those of the other two treatments. The plant height of blue light treatment was the lowest, 6.62 cm, which was significantly lower than those of the other two treatments; the root length of blue light treatment was the longest, 10.42cm, which was significantly higher than those of the other two treatments. There was no significant difference in the biomass of fresh grass and hay between blue light and red blue light, which was significantly higher than that of white light.【Conclusion】Under the condition of artificial light hydroponics, LED white light promotes the stem elongation and plant height of the upper part of barley plant, while the fresh weight, dry weight and root growth of the lower part are inhibited. Led blue light can promote the growth and biomass accumulation of barley roots, but plant height elongation is limited. The combination of red and blue LED can promote the increase of barley biomass, which is the recommended light quality for hydroponic cultivation of barley forage.

Key words: barley; hydroponics; LED light source; light quality; biomass

中图分类号:

S512.3

杨金钰, 孙九胜, 乔小燕, 槐国龙. 不同光质配比对水培牧草大麦生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1871-1876.

YANG Jinyu, SUN Jiusheng, QIAO Xiaoyan, HUAI Guolong. Effects of Different Light Quality Ratios on the Growth of Hydroponic Forage Barley[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1871-1876.

图/表 4

图 1 不同光质下水培大麦株高变化注：不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著（P<0.05）,下同。

Fig. 1 Plant height of barly under different light qualities Note：The significant differences were showed by different lower-case letters with various treatments at 5% level of probability. The same as below.

图 2 不同光质下水培大麦根长变化

Fig. 2 Root length of barly under different light qualities

图 3 不同光质下水培大麦鲜重变化

Fig. 3 Fresh weight of barly under different light qualities

图 4 不同光质下水培大麦干重变化

Fig. 4 Dry weight of barly under different light qualities

参考文献 21

[1]	Pfündel E, Baake E. A quantitative description of fluorescence excitation spectra in intact bean leaves greened under intermittent light[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 26(1):19-28. DOI PMID
[2]	Terashima I, Fujita T, Inoue T, et al. Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green[J]. Plant Cell Physiolgy, 2009, 50(4):684-697.
[3]	Hogewoning S. W, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H, et al. Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light[J]. Journal Of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61: 3107-3117. DOI PMID
[4]	Nhut D T, Takamura T, Watanabe H, et al. Responses of strawberry plantlets cultured in vitro under superbright red and blue light-emitting diodes(LEDs)[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 2003, 73(1): 43-52. DOI URL
[5]	Li H, Tang C, Xu Z. The effects of different light qualities on rapeseed(Brassica napus L.) plantlet growth and morphogenesis in vitro[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 150:117-124. DOI URL
[6]	Hernández R, Kubota C. Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, 29(1):66-74.
[7]	Brown C S, Schuerger A C, Sager J C. Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red light-emitting diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1995, 120(5):808-813. PMID
[8]	Goins G D, Yorio N C, Sanwo M M, et al. Photomorphogenesis, photosynthesis, and seed yield of wheat plant grown under red light-emitting diodes(LED) with and without supplemental blue lighting[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1997, 48(7): 1407-1413 DOI URL
[9]	Hogewoning S W, Douwstra P, Trouwborst G, et al. An artificial solar spectrum substantially alters plant development compared with usual climate room irradiance spectra[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61(5):1267-1276. DOI PMID
[10]	Nanya K, Ishigami Y, Hikosaka S, et al. Effects of blue and red light on stem elongation and flowering of tomato seedlings[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2012, 956,261-266.
[11]	Ohashi-Kaneko K, Matsuda R, Goto E, et al. Growth of rice plants under red light with or without supplemental blue light[J]. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 2006, 52(04):444-452.
[12]	Causin H F, Jauregui R N, Barneix A J. The effect of light spectral quality on leaf senescence and oxidative stress in wheat[J]. Plant Science, 2006, 171(1): 24-33. DOI URL
[13]	黄万里, 王建平, 刘宁, 等. 不同水培时间下大麦苗的营养价值及CNCPS组分[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(7):1811-1818.
	HUANG Wanli, WANG Jianping, LIU Ning, et al. Determination of nutritive value and analysis of the CNCPS contents in barley grass cultivated using a hydroponic system[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(7):1811-1818.
[14]	刘明, 赵琦, 王小菁, 等. 植物的光受体及其调控机制的研究[J]. 生物学通报, 2005, 40(5):10-12.
	LIU Ming, ZHAO Qi, WANG Xiaojing, et al. Studies on photoreceptors and their regulatory mechanisms in plants[J]. Biology Bulletin, 2005, 40(5): 10-12.
[15]	王挺进, 杨洋, 杨榭崧, 等. LED 光质对上海青与樱桃萝卜早期生长的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2019,( 10) : 75-79.
	WANG Tingjin, YANG Yang, YANG Shesong, et al. Effect of LED light quality on early growth of Shanghai green radish and Cherry Radish[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019,(10): 75-79.
[16]	李雯琳. LED光源不同光质对叶用莴苣种子发芽及幼苗生理生化特性的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2009:29-30.
	LI Wenlin. Effect of different light qualities on seed germination and physiological and biochemical characteristics of lettuce(Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings by using the LED light[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2009:29-30.
[17]	李思静, 易晓瞳, 李有芳, 等. 不同LED 光质对枳壳幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2018, 38(3) : 708-714.
	LI Sijing, YI Xiaotong, LI Youfang, et al. Effects of different LED light quality on the growth and development of trifoliate orange seedlings[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2018, 38(3): 708-714.
[18]	Nhut D T, Don N T, Tanaka M. Light-Emitting Diodes as an Effective Lighting Source for In Vitro Banana Culture[M]. Springer Netherlands, 2007, 527-541.
[19]	郭银生, 谷艾素, 崔瑾. 光质对水稻幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(6):1485-1492.
	GUO Yinsheng, GU Aisu, CUI Jin. Effects of light quality on growth and physiological characteristics of rice seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 22(6): 1485-1492.
[20]	Matsuda R., Ohashi K. K., Fujiwara K., et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of rice leaves grown under red light with or without supplemental blue light[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 2004, 45:1870-1874. DOI URL
[21]	刘文科, 查凌雁. 植物工厂植物光质生理及其调控[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社. 2019,215-220.
	LIU Wenke, ZHA Lingyan. Light quality physiology and its regulation in plant factory[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2019, 215-220.

不同光质配比对水培牧草大麦生长的影响

Effects of Different Light Quality Ratios on the Growth of Hydroponic Forage Barley

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	肖淑婷, 颜安, 王卫霞, 张青青, 侯正清, 马梦倩, 孙哲. 天山中部典型林区地上生物量时空变化及影响因素分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2237-2244.
[2]	苗雨, 陈翠霞, 马艳明, 邢国芳, 董裕生, 陈智军, 王仙, 向莉. 276份中亚大麦种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895.
[3]	李汝勇, 任久明, 雷霆, 王克林, 刘鹏程, 李江涛. 基于光合法和生物量法分析塔里木沙漠公路防护林带碳汇估算差异性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 2014-2022.
[4]	邵亚杰, 李珂, 丁文浩, 林涛, 崔建平, 郭仁松, 王亮, 吴凤全, 王心, 汤秋香. 基于无人机多光谱影像特征估算棉花生物量[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1328-1335.
[5]	鞠乐, 齐军仓, 牛银亭, 石培春, 宋瑞娇, 宋凌宇, 阴志刚, 陈培育, 强学兰. 基于RNA-seq的大麦苗期抗旱相关基因的挖掘与分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1077-1084.
[6]	耿美菊, 王新绘, 刘晓颖, 吕佩. 封育对荒漠草原真菌群落的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1250-1258.
[7]	李亚莉, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 唐亚莉, 段婧婧, 李青军. 氮磷减施与钾协同共效对加工番茄产量和养分吸收的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 3014-3019.
[8]	侯正清, 颜安, 谢开云, 袁以琳, 夏雯秋, 肖淑婷, 张振飞, 孙哲. 基于植被指数融合天山假狼毒地上生物量的估测[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2787-2796.
[9]	马艳, 肖林刚, 喻晨, 郭兆峰, 邹平, 曹新伟. 设施蔬菜LED补光技术研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2835-2843.
[10]	侯正清, 颜安, 谢开云, 袁以琳, 夏雯秋, 肖淑婷, 张振飞, 孙哲. 基于多特征融合的无人机天山假狼毒地上生物量估算[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2527-2536.
[11]	沈煜洋, 王仙, 陈利, 郭小玲, 苗雨, 董裕生, 陈智军, 方伏荣, 向莉, 高海峰. 新疆荒漠绿洲区大麦田阔叶杂草化学防除药效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 184-189.
[12]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[13]	鞠乐, 齐军仓, 陈培育, 牛银亭, 阴志刚. 干旱胁迫对大麦种子萌发、幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1879-1886.
[14]	韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903.
[15]	杨金钰, 王西和, 孙九胜. 水培对全株大麦和小麦苗氨基酸组成的影响及对比分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1589-1595.