Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (5): 1253-1262.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.025
• Microbes·Animal Husbandry Veterinarian • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Jingyu1(), GAO Yan2, GAO Xingwang3(), ZENG Jun2(), ZHAO Pengan3, Subinuer Julaiti3
Received:
2022-09-10
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-05-22
Correspondence author:
GAO Xingwang (1983 -), male, native place: Urumqi, Xinjiang. Lecturer, Doctor, Master' tutor, research field: plant-microorganism interaction,(E - mail) Supported by:
田敬宇1(), 高雁2, 高兴旺3(), 曾军2(), 赵鹏安3, 苏比努尔·居来提3
通讯作者:
高兴旺(1983-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,讲师,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为植物-微生物互作,(E-mail)作者简介:
田敬宇(1998-),女,河北人,硕士,研究方向为修复生态学,(E-mail)1178798094@stu.xju.edu.cn
基金资助:
CLC Number:
TIAN Jingyu, GAO Yan, GAO Xingwang, ZENG Jun, ZHAO Pengan, Subinuer Julaiti. Analysis of rhizospheric bacterial community structure and diversity of Hami melon under field cultivation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262.
田敬宇, 高雁, 高兴旺, 曾军, 赵鹏安, 苏比努尔·居来提. 哈密瓜种植对根际土壤细菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.025
理化性质 physicochemical properties | W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W10 | W11 | W20 | W21 | W30 | W31 | |
pH | 7.00±0.12a | 7.26±0.15b | 6.79±0.25a | 7.11±0.09b | 7.60±0.10a | 7.78±0.13b |
EC(mg/L) | 472.4±0.41a | 615.2±1.30b | 1038.4±1.14b | 293.6±6.58a | 716.4±3.84b | 619.6±3.84a |
有机质 Soil organic matter(g/kg) | 21.83±0.43b | 21.23±0.24a | 13.81±0.38b | 13.11±0.37a | 9.11±0.03a | 9.11±0.03a |
全氮 Total N(g/kg) | 1.02±0.01a | 1.11±0.03a | 0.68±0.03a | 0.68±0.01a | 0.43±0.01a | 0.43±0.01a |
全磷 Total P(g/kg) | 1.03±0.02a | 1.06±0.01a | 0.92±0.01b | 0.90±0.01a | 0.89±0.01b | 0.84±0.03a |
全钾 Total K(g/kg) | 21.93±0.24b | 21.52±0.11a | 19.92±0.16a | 19.91±0.23a | 20.94±0.14b | 20.61±0.02a |
碱解氮 Available N(mg/kg) | 49.80±0.43a | 49.95±0.44a | 44.05±1.32b | 42.54±0.61a | 28.81±2.07b | 10.70±0.88a |
有效磷 Available P(mg/kg) | 49.85±0.25a | 50.50±0.46b | 33.59±1.34a | 34.55±0.94a | 27.08±2.30b | 20.67±0.86a |
速效钾 Available P(mg/kg) | 330.3±6.46b | 310.6±5.32a | 190.8±5.84a | 201.7±6.91b | 129±6.15a | 151.3±6.74b |
Tab.1 The physicochemical properties of rhizosphere soil/non-rhizosphere soil from the three Hami melon samplings
理化性质 physicochemical properties | W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W10 | W11 | W20 | W21 | W30 | W31 | |
pH | 7.00±0.12a | 7.26±0.15b | 6.79±0.25a | 7.11±0.09b | 7.60±0.10a | 7.78±0.13b |
EC(mg/L) | 472.4±0.41a | 615.2±1.30b | 1038.4±1.14b | 293.6±6.58a | 716.4±3.84b | 619.6±3.84a |
有机质 Soil organic matter(g/kg) | 21.83±0.43b | 21.23±0.24a | 13.81±0.38b | 13.11±0.37a | 9.11±0.03a | 9.11±0.03a |
全氮 Total N(g/kg) | 1.02±0.01a | 1.11±0.03a | 0.68±0.03a | 0.68±0.01a | 0.43±0.01a | 0.43±0.01a |
全磷 Total P(g/kg) | 1.03±0.02a | 1.06±0.01a | 0.92±0.01b | 0.90±0.01a | 0.89±0.01b | 0.84±0.03a |
全钾 Total K(g/kg) | 21.93±0.24b | 21.52±0.11a | 19.92±0.16a | 19.91±0.23a | 20.94±0.14b | 20.61±0.02a |
碱解氮 Available N(mg/kg) | 49.80±0.43a | 49.95±0.44a | 44.05±1.32b | 42.54±0.61a | 28.81±2.07b | 10.70±0.88a |
有效磷 Available P(mg/kg) | 49.85±0.25a | 50.50±0.46b | 33.59±1.34a | 34.55±0.94a | 27.08±2.30b | 20.67±0.86a |
速效钾 Available P(mg/kg) | 330.3±6.46b | 310.6±5.32a | 190.8±5.84a | 201.7±6.91b | 129±6.15a | 151.3±6.74b |
α-多样性指数 Alpha-diversity indices | W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W10 | W11 | W20 | W21 | W30 | W31 | |
丰富度指数 Richness index | 1 702.2±158.0a | 1 618.7±107.9a | 1 522.2±189.3a | 1 678.0±140.6a | 1 726.0±200.9a | 1 882.6±232.2a |
Chao 1指数 Chao1 index | 1 712.2±167.0a | 1 624.5±108.0a | 1 528.18±194.83a | 1 693.2±151.0a | 1 372.7±206.1a | 1 903.2±238.6a |
Shannon指数 Shannon index | 9.87±0.08a | 9.74±0.23a | 9.64±0.17a | 9.69±0.10a | 9.90±0.19a | 9.80±0.62a |
Tab.2 Alpha-diversity indices of rhizosphere soil/non-rhizosphere soil bacterial community from the three Hami melon samplings(n=5)
α-多样性指数 Alpha-diversity indices | W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W10 | W11 | W20 | W21 | W30 | W31 | |
丰富度指数 Richness index | 1 702.2±158.0a | 1 618.7±107.9a | 1 522.2±189.3a | 1 678.0±140.6a | 1 726.0±200.9a | 1 882.6±232.2a |
Chao 1指数 Chao1 index | 1 712.2±167.0a | 1 624.5±108.0a | 1 528.18±194.83a | 1 693.2±151.0a | 1 372.7±206.1a | 1 903.2±238.6a |
Shannon指数 Shannon index | 9.87±0.08a | 9.74±0.23a | 9.64±0.17a | 9.69±0.10a | 9.90±0.19a | 9.80±0.62a |
分类 Classification | W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W10 | W11 | W20 | W21 | W30 | W31 | |
变形菌门Proteobacteria | 27.41±2.45a | 27.95±2.94a | 23.59±1.76a | 25.29±1.57a | 26.42±2.17a | 25.33±0.93a |
Skermanella属 | 3.50±0.90a | 3.26±0.54a | 1.92±0.26a | 1.86±0.68a | 1.50±0.25a | 1.33±0.38a |
Pseudomonas属 | 0.38±0.10a | 2.07±4.14a | 0.24±0.06a | 0.25±0.15a | 0.09±0.03a | 0.68±1.24a |
Acidibacter属 | 0.69±0.11a | 0.58±0.03a | 0.29±0.05a | 0.27±0.07a | 0.55±0.16a | 0.44±0.13a |
放线菌门Actinobacteriota | 20.36±1.08a | 20.78±1.69a | 18.44±1.12a | 18.08±1.06a | 18.45±1.27a | 17.89±4.56a |
Pseudarthrobacter属 | 1.27±0.23a | 1.71±0.25b | 1.12±0.12a | 1.33±0.22a | 3.33±0.44a | 2.62±0.63a |
酸杆菌门Acidobacteriota | 14.37±0.85a | 14.11±0.40a | 14.65±0.94a | 13.93±1.22a | 14.94±0.42a | 12.41±3.75a |
Vicinamibacteraceae属 | 4.25±0.32b | 3.29±0.11a | 2.49±0.21a | 2.48±0.34a | 3.77±0.43b | 2.89±0.65a |
RB41属 | 2.18±0.27a | 2.50±0.17a | 4.59±0.52a | 4.00±0.61a | 2.61±0.29a | 2.51±0.72a |
芽单胞菌门Gemmatimonadota | 9.74±1.68a | 10.46±0.62b | 8.99±0.75b | 7.35±0.64a | 8.33±1.07b | 6.05±1.71a |
拟杆菌门Bacteroidota | 7.20±0.61a | 4.45±0.51a | 4.80±0.85b | 3.85±0.19a | 4.00±0.62a | 4.37±1.06a |
Pontibacter属 | 0.18±0.04a | 0.32±0.14a | 1.18±0.40b | 0.19±0.07a | 0.12±0.04a | 0.15±0.04a |
绿弯菌门Chloroflexi | 5.10±0.33a | 4.64±0.34a | 4.86±0.47a | 4.76±0.36a | 4.12±0.08a | 3.96±1.38a |
JG30-KF-CM45属 | 0.93±0.12a | 0.90±0.16a | 0.88±0.18a | 0.68±0.15a | 0.63±0.03a | 0.56±0.23a |
粘球菌门Myxococcota | 3.81±0.20a | 4.43±0.49b | 3.09±0.16a | 3.35±0.29a | 3.70±0.27a | 3.23±1.10a |
厚壁菌门Firmicutes | 2.07±0.61a | 3.36±1.00b | 8.96±1.95a | 11.42±0.86b | 8.56±1.59a | 14.60±10.64a |
Bacillus属 | 1.49±0.36a | 2.52±0.90a | 7.06±1.57a | 9.02±0.82b | 5.39±0.98a | 5.38±1.02a |
Staphylococcus属 | 0.00±0.00a | 0.01±0.02a | 0.00±0.00a | 0.01±0.01a | 0.00±0.00a | 2.11±4.71a |
微菌门Verrucomicrobiota | 1.54±0.19a | 1.60±0.32a | 1.91±0.59a | 1.43±0.49a | 27.08±2.30b | 1.48±0.51a |
Entotheonellaeota门 | 2.82±1.06a | 2.17±0.59a | 3.78±0.42a | 3.20±0.42a | 8.56±1.59a | 14.60±10.64a |
Candidatus_ Entotheonella属 | 1.47±0.19a | 1.52±0.30a | 3.47±0.40a | 2.89±0.40a | 1.34±0.14a | 1.29±0.43a |
Tab.3 The relative abundance of soil bacterial community at the phylum and genus levels from the three Hami melon samplings
分类 Classification | W1 | W2 | W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W10 | W11 | W20 | W21 | W30 | W31 | |
变形菌门Proteobacteria | 27.41±2.45a | 27.95±2.94a | 23.59±1.76a | 25.29±1.57a | 26.42±2.17a | 25.33±0.93a |
Skermanella属 | 3.50±0.90a | 3.26±0.54a | 1.92±0.26a | 1.86±0.68a | 1.50±0.25a | 1.33±0.38a |
Pseudomonas属 | 0.38±0.10a | 2.07±4.14a | 0.24±0.06a | 0.25±0.15a | 0.09±0.03a | 0.68±1.24a |
Acidibacter属 | 0.69±0.11a | 0.58±0.03a | 0.29±0.05a | 0.27±0.07a | 0.55±0.16a | 0.44±0.13a |
放线菌门Actinobacteriota | 20.36±1.08a | 20.78±1.69a | 18.44±1.12a | 18.08±1.06a | 18.45±1.27a | 17.89±4.56a |
Pseudarthrobacter属 | 1.27±0.23a | 1.71±0.25b | 1.12±0.12a | 1.33±0.22a | 3.33±0.44a | 2.62±0.63a |
酸杆菌门Acidobacteriota | 14.37±0.85a | 14.11±0.40a | 14.65±0.94a | 13.93±1.22a | 14.94±0.42a | 12.41±3.75a |
Vicinamibacteraceae属 | 4.25±0.32b | 3.29±0.11a | 2.49±0.21a | 2.48±0.34a | 3.77±0.43b | 2.89±0.65a |
RB41属 | 2.18±0.27a | 2.50±0.17a | 4.59±0.52a | 4.00±0.61a | 2.61±0.29a | 2.51±0.72a |
芽单胞菌门Gemmatimonadota | 9.74±1.68a | 10.46±0.62b | 8.99±0.75b | 7.35±0.64a | 8.33±1.07b | 6.05±1.71a |
拟杆菌门Bacteroidota | 7.20±0.61a | 4.45±0.51a | 4.80±0.85b | 3.85±0.19a | 4.00±0.62a | 4.37±1.06a |
Pontibacter属 | 0.18±0.04a | 0.32±0.14a | 1.18±0.40b | 0.19±0.07a | 0.12±0.04a | 0.15±0.04a |
绿弯菌门Chloroflexi | 5.10±0.33a | 4.64±0.34a | 4.86±0.47a | 4.76±0.36a | 4.12±0.08a | 3.96±1.38a |
JG30-KF-CM45属 | 0.93±0.12a | 0.90±0.16a | 0.88±0.18a | 0.68±0.15a | 0.63±0.03a | 0.56±0.23a |
粘球菌门Myxococcota | 3.81±0.20a | 4.43±0.49b | 3.09±0.16a | 3.35±0.29a | 3.70±0.27a | 3.23±1.10a |
厚壁菌门Firmicutes | 2.07±0.61a | 3.36±1.00b | 8.96±1.95a | 11.42±0.86b | 8.56±1.59a | 14.60±10.64a |
Bacillus属 | 1.49±0.36a | 2.52±0.90a | 7.06±1.57a | 9.02±0.82b | 5.39±0.98a | 5.38±1.02a |
Staphylococcus属 | 0.00±0.00a | 0.01±0.02a | 0.00±0.00a | 0.01±0.01a | 0.00±0.00a | 2.11±4.71a |
微菌门Verrucomicrobiota | 1.54±0.19a | 1.60±0.32a | 1.91±0.59a | 1.43±0.49a | 27.08±2.30b | 1.48±0.51a |
Entotheonellaeota门 | 2.82±1.06a | 2.17±0.59a | 3.78±0.42a | 3.20±0.42a | 8.56±1.59a | 14.60±10.64a |
Candidatus_ Entotheonella属 | 1.47±0.19a | 1.52±0.30a | 3.47±0.40a | 2.89±0.40a | 1.34±0.14a | 1.29±0.43a |
Fig.3 The LEfSe (LDA Effect Size) and random forest analyses of rhizosphere soil/ non-rhizosphere soil bacterial community from the three Hami melon samplings Note:The threshold value of LDA is 3.5.The red and green taxonomies represent the biomarkers playing an important role in the two tests of three groups, respectively
Fig.4 The distance based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) of environmental factors with rhizosphere soil/ non-rhizosphere soil bacterial at the phylum level from the three Hami melon samplings
因子组合 Different combination of environmental factors | Mantel检验 | |
---|---|---|
rM | P | |
TK | 0.442 4 | 0.001 |
pH | 0.456 9 | 0.001 |
TK+pH | 0.529 3 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP | 0.628 6 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK | 0.700 5 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK+TN | 0.729 1 | 0.001 |
TK+AK+pH+TP+TN+AP | 0.722 6 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK+TN+AP+AN | 0.742 7 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK+TN+AP+AN+EC | 0.702 4 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+AK+TN+AP+AN+TP+SOM+EC | 0.709 7 | 0.001 |
Tab.4 The relationship between different combination of environmental variables and soil bacterial community of rhizosphere soil/non-rhizosphere soil bacterial community from the three Hami melon samplings
因子组合 Different combination of environmental factors | Mantel检验 | |
---|---|---|
rM | P | |
TK | 0.442 4 | 0.001 |
pH | 0.456 9 | 0.001 |
TK+pH | 0.529 3 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP | 0.628 6 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK | 0.700 5 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK+TN | 0.729 1 | 0.001 |
TK+AK+pH+TP+TN+AP | 0.722 6 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK+TN+AP+AN | 0.742 7 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+TP+AK+TN+AP+AN+EC | 0.702 4 | 0.001 |
TK+pH+AK+TN+AP+AN+TP+SOM+EC | 0.709 7 | 0.001 |
[1] |
Bai Y, Wang G, Cheng Y, et al. Soil acidification in continuously cropped tobacco alters bacterial community structure and diversity via the accumulation of phenolic acids[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 1-18.
DOI |
[2] | 林德佩. 甜瓜(Cucumis melo L.)种下分类专论[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2012, 25(5): 42-46. |
LIN Depei. Comments on Intraspecific Classification of Melon[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2012, 25(5): 42-46. | |
[3] | 徐小军, 张桂兰, 周亚峰, 等. 甜瓜设施栽培连作土壤的理化性质及生物活性[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(9): 1131-1138. |
XU Xiaojun, ZHANG Guilan, ZHOU Yafeng, et al. Studies on the physical-chemical and biological properties of soils cropped continuously with melon under protected cultivation condition[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(9): 1131-1138. | |
[4] | 周艳丽, 乔宏宇, 高红春, 等. 甜瓜连作对其根际土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2015,(19): 158-161. |
ZHOU Yanli, QIAO Hongyu, GAO Hongchun, et al. Effect of Melon Continuous Cropping on Rhizosphere Soil Microorganisms and Enzyme Activities[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2015,(19): 158-161. | |
[5] | 唐小付, 刘岳飞, 张传进, 等. 设施甜瓜种植年限对土壤生物学特性和细菌多样性的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(8): 1493-1500. |
TANG Xiaofu, LIU Yuefei, ZHANG Chuanjin, et al. Effect of Different Planting Years on Soil Biological Properties and Bacterial Diversity in Protected Cultivation of Cucumis melo L.[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(8): 1493-1500. | |
[6] | 郑立伟, 赵阳阳, 王一冰, 等. 不同连作年限甜瓜种植土壤性质和微生物多样性[J]. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49(1): 101-114. |
ZHENG Liwei, ZHAO Yangyang, WANG Yibing, et al. Soil properties and microbial diversity in the muskmelon fields after continuous cropping for different years[J]. Microbiology China, 2022, 49(1): 101-114. | |
[7] | 刘旻霞, 李博文, 孙瑞弟, 等. 高寒草甸黄帚橐吾种群根际/非根际土壤可培养微生物群落特征[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(12):4853-4863. |
LIU Minxia, LI Bowen, SUN Ruidi, et al. Characteristics of culturable microbial communities in rhizosphere/non-rhizosphere soil of Ligularia virgaurea in alpine meadow elevation gradient[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(12): 4853-4863. | |
[8] | 陈悦, 吕光辉, 李岩. 独山子区优势草本植物根际与非根际土壤微生物功能多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(9): 3110-3117. |
CHEN Yue, LU Guanghui, LI Yan, et al. Soil microbial functional diversity of rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere of three dominant herbaceous plants in the Dushanzi District[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(9): 3110-3117. | |
[9] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. |
BAO Shidan. Soil and Agricultural Chemical Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. | |
[10] |
Berg J, Brandt K K, Al-Soud W A, et al. Selection for Cu-tolerant bacterial communities with altered composition, but unaltered richness, via long-term Cu exposure[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(20): 7438-7446.
PMID |
[11] |
Michelsen C F, Pedas P, Glaring M A, et al. Bacterial diversity in Greenlandic soils as affected by potato cropping and inorganic versus organic fertilization[J]. Polar Biology, 2014, 37(1): 61-71.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Magoĉ T, Salzberg S L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies[J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(21): 2957-2963.
DOI PMID |
[13] |
Haas B J, Gevers D, Earl A M, et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons[J]. Genome Research, 2011, 21(3): 494-504.
DOI PMID |
[14] | 张丽娜, 于勇, 韩冰, 等. 甜瓜连作对土壤肥力及酶活性的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2016,(6): 79-81. |
ZHANG Lina, YU Yong, HAN Bing, et al. Effect of Melon Continuous Cropping on Soil Fertility and Soil Enzyme Activity[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016,(6): 79-81. | |
[15] | 刘垠霖, 蔡立群, 赵瑞, 等. 吐鲁番哈密瓜土壤养分及酶活性对连作年限的响应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(1): 273-281. |
LIU Yinlin, CAI Liqun, ZHAO Rui, et al. Response of soil nutrient and enzyme activity to continuous cropping years of Turpan Hami melon[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021,(1): 273-281. | |
[16] |
Huang Y, Xiao X, Huang H, et al. Contrasting beneficial and pathogenic microbial communities across consecutive cropping fields of greenhouse strawberry[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102(13): 5717-5729.
DOI PMID |
[17] |
YAN N, Marschner P. Response of microbial activity and biomass to increasing salinity depends on the final salinity, not the original salinity[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 53: 50-55.
DOI URL |
[18] | 武均. 不同管理措施下陇中黄土高原旱作农田土壤生态化学计量学特征研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018. |
WU Jun. Study on Soil Ecological Stoichiometry under Different Soil Management Practices in Dry Farmland of the Loess Plateau of Central Gansu Province[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[19] |
LIU Q, Wang S, Li K, et al. Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to the long-term monoculture of grapevine[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2021, 105(18): 7035-7050.
DOI PMID |
[20] |
Obalum S E, Chibuike G U, Peth S, et al. Soil organic matter as sole indicator of soil degradation[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189(4): 1-19.
DOI URL |
[21] | ZHU S, WANG Y, XU X, et al. Potential use of high-throughput sequencing of soil microbial communities for estimating the adverse effects of continuous cropping on ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.Gaud)[J]. PloS One, 2018, 13(5): e0197095. |
[22] |
Berendsen R L, Vismans G, Yu K, et al. Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium[J]. The ISME Journal, 2018, 12(6): 1496-1507.
DOI |
[23] |
Kalam S, Basu A, Ahmad I, et al. Recent understanding of soil acidobacteria and their ecological significance: a critical review[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11: 580024.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Pang Z, Dong F, Liu Q, et al. Soil metagenomics reveals effects of continuous sugarcane cropping on the structure and functional pathway of rhizospheric microbial community[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12: 627569.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Li Q, Song A, Yang H, et al. Impact of rocky desertification control on soil bacterial community in Karst Graben Basin, Southwestern China[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12: 636405.
DOI URL |
[26] | Sarkar S, Ward K, Jansson J K, et al. Detection of stress functional responses in bacterial populations under dry soil conditions show potential microbial mechanisms to resist drought conditions[J]. BioRxiv, 2020. |
[27] |
Mannaa M, Han G, Jeon H W, et al. Influence of resistance-inducing chemical elicitors against pine wilt disease on the rhizosphere microbiome[J]. Microorganisms, 2020, 8(6): 884.
DOI URL |
[28] | SHEN M, ZHANG Y, BO G, et al. Microbial responses to the reduction of chemical fertilizers in the rhizosphere soil of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2021: 1464. |
[29] |
Badri D V, Chaparro J M, Zhang R, et al. Application of natural blends of phytochemicals derived from the root exudates of Arabidopsis to the soil reveal that phenolic-related compounds predominantly modulate the soil microbiome[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2013, 288(7): 4502-4512.
DOI PMID |
[30] |
Chevrot R, Rosen R, Haudecoeur E, et al. GABA controls the level of quorum-sensing signal in Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006, 103(19): 7460-7464.
DOI URL |
[31] | Berlanga-Clavero M V, Molina-Santiago C, Caraballo-Rodríguez A M, et al. Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix components target seed oil bodies to promote growth and anti-fungal resistance in melon[J]. Nature Microbiology, 2022: 1-15. |
[32] |
Santoyo G, Orozco-Mosqueda M C, Govindappa M. Mechanisms of biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activity in soil bacterial species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas: a review[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2012, 22(8): 855-872.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Alibrandi P, Cardinale M, Rahman M D, et al. The seed endosphere of Anadenanthera colubrina is inhabited by a complex microbiota, including Methylobacterium spp.and Staphylococcus spp.with potential plant-growth promoting activities[J]. Plant and Soil, 2018, 422(1): 81-99.
DOI URL |
[1] | YAO Jun, ZHENG Heyun, ZHANG Cuihuan, Zaituna Maimaiti, GENG Xinli. Effects of continuous illumination with LED on storage characteristics and sugar metabolism of muskmelon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1689-1697. |
[2] | LIU Yang, BAI Yujia, ZHANG Zhengxiao, CHU Chenli, WANG Tiantian, FENG Zuoshan. Changes of related proteins and phenylpropane metabolic enzymes in melon infected by Alternaria alternata [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1780-1789. |
[3] | ZHANG Hao, LIU Yi, ZHOU Bo, HUANG Yuan, FU Xiaofa, MA Yue, WU Haibo, HU Guozhi, MAO Jiancai, CHEN Jihao, LIANG Qigan, WANG Min. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on aromatic compounds of muskmelon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2993-3007. |
[4] | YANG Zhiyi, WANG Huilin, WANG Rui, WANG Chaonan, XU Baolin, QIU Huojian. Effects of six copper preparations on growth index, yield and quality of major melons [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 3008-3017. |
[5] | YANG Shiying, MA Yue, JIA Binxin, HUA Zhenyu, SHEN Qi, LIU Fengjuan, WANG Cheng. Study on degradation of pesticide residues in muskmelon by brassinolide [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2541-2550. |
[6] | YAN Miao, XIONG Tao, HUANG Quansheng, WU Ting, WU Haibo, ZHAO Zhun, HU Guozhi. Effect of Exogenous Salicylic Acid(SA)on the Leaf Anatomical Structure of Hami Melon under NaCl Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2123-2129. |
[7] | XU Bin, ZHANG Ting, PAN Yan, WANG Ziming, ZHANG Lianwen, XIE Xiaoding. The Effect on Texture Quality of Simulation Transport Vibration with Different Stacking Heights of Hami melon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2130-2135. |
[8] | XU Bin, Atawula Tiemur, ZHANG Ting, PAN Yan, ZHANG Lianwen, XIE Xiaoding. Effects of Different Temperatures on the Fruit Softening of Xizhoumi No. 25 Hami Melon during Storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1135-1143. |
[9] | LIU Zhigang, REN Hongsong, Huxidan Maimaiti, Amuti Kuerban, GUO Hongmei, WANG Ruihua, LI Haifeng, HU Guozhi. Effects of Amino Acid Selenium Foliar Fertilizer on Growth and Development and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Muskmelon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 874-883. |
[10] | JI Feng, LI Zhiyuan, SHANG Zhiyong, ZHANG Lianwen. Effects of Vibration on Mechanical Damage and Storage Quality of Hami Melon during Transportation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 458-465. |
[11] | YANG Yong, FAN Rong, ZHANG Xuejun, LI Meihua, LING Yueming, ZHANG Hong, YANG Wenli, JIANG Xue, ZHANG Yongbing, YI Hongping. QTL Mapping and Candidate Gene Analysis of Sucrose Content in the Center Flesh of Muskmelon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2446-2455. |
[12] | ZHENG Yannan, YAO Yongsheng, Guljiani Asghar, AN Shijie, LI Yanxia, ZHI Jinhu. Effects of Different Improvement Measures on Particle Composition and Fractal Characteristics of Sandy Soil [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1665-1671. |
[13] | WANG Haojie, MAO Jiancai, LI Junhua, ZHAI Wenqiang. Effects of Different Rootstock Grafting on the Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Muskmelon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(6): 1048-1054. |
[14] | Abudoukeyoumu Abudourezike, ZHANG Yan, WANG Wei, YAN Guorong, ZHAO Lianjia, Gulimila Aikebaier. Effect of Shading on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Muskmelon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(6): 1064-1070. |
[15] | LIU Zhigang, REN Hongsong, Maimaiti Aihemaiti, Huxidan Maimaiti, Nuerziyeguli Mahemuti, Amuti Kuerban, WANG Ruihua, LI Haifeng. Effects of Amino Acid Selenium Leaf Fertilizer on the Physiological Characteristics of Early Senescence of Autumn Dew Muskmelon Leaves in Turpan [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(6): 1078-1085. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||