Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (5): 1208-1215.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.020
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Processing·Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
JI Rui(), WANG Lan, WANG Zhe, GOU Changqing, HAO Haiting, FENG Hongzu()
Received:
2022-09-25
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-05-22
Correspondence author:
FENG Hongzu (1968-), male, doctor, professor, research direction: the integrated control of agricultural pests,(E-mail)Supported by:
通讯作者:
冯宏祖(1968-),男,青海海东人,教授,博士,研究方向为农业有害生物综合防治,(E-mail)作者简介:
姬瑞(1995-),女,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,研究方向为果树生理与高效栽培,(E-mail)2142949280@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
JI Rui, WANG Lan, WANG Zhe, GOU Changqing, HAO Haiting, FENG Hongzu. Effects of chitosan to pollination solution on fruit setting rate and fruit quality of Korla Fragrant Pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1208-1215.
姬瑞, 王兰, 王喆, 苟长青, 郝海婷, 冯宏祖. 授粉液中添加几丁聚糖对库尔勒香梨树坐果率及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1208-1215.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.020
Fig.1 Effects of different concentrations of chitosan treatment for 2h on the germination rate of pollinated pollen of Kuerlexiangli (Yali pear pollen ) Note : Different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P< 0.05 ),the same as below
处理 Treatment | 单果重 Fruit weight(g) | 纵径 Vertical diameter(mm) | 横径 Horizontal diameter(mm) | 果形指数 Shape index | 硬度 Hardness (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 128.03±7.01b | 67.51±0.92b | 57.50±0.89b | 1.17±0.03c | 11.87±0.69a |
J1 | 133.06±12.79a | 64.58±2.85c | 53.80±2.75c | 1.20±0.02a | 10.10±0.57c |
J2 | 136.25±10.72a | 71.20±2.53a | 59.14±2.76a | 1.21±0.04a | 10.53±0.66bc |
J3 | 136.00±11.95a | 71.83±2.44a | 59.85±2.81a | 1.20±0.03a | 9.90±0.45c |
J4 | 132.73±10.30ab | 63.47±2.55c | 53.35±2.49c | 1.19±0.06b | 11.51±0.16ab |
J5 | 132.08±10.90ab | 59.21±1.85d | 50.33±2.84d | 1.18±0.07bc | 11.70±0.26a |
J6 | 131.66±9.47ab | 63.82±1.74c | 54.11±1.51c | 1.18±0.04bc | 11.98±0.27a |
Tab.1 Changes in external quality of Kuer Fragrant Pear treated with different concentrations of chitosan
处理 Treatment | 单果重 Fruit weight(g) | 纵径 Vertical diameter(mm) | 横径 Horizontal diameter(mm) | 果形指数 Shape index | 硬度 Hardness (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 128.03±7.01b | 67.51±0.92b | 57.50±0.89b | 1.17±0.03c | 11.87±0.69a |
J1 | 133.06±12.79a | 64.58±2.85c | 53.80±2.75c | 1.20±0.02a | 10.10±0.57c |
J2 | 136.25±10.72a | 71.20±2.53a | 59.14±2.76a | 1.21±0.04a | 10.53±0.66bc |
J3 | 136.00±11.95a | 71.83±2.44a | 59.85±2.81a | 1.20±0.03a | 9.90±0.45c |
J4 | 132.73±10.30ab | 63.47±2.55c | 53.35±2.49c | 1.19±0.06b | 11.51±0.16ab |
J5 | 132.08±10.90ab | 59.21±1.85d | 50.33±2.84d | 1.18±0.07bc | 11.70±0.26a |
J6 | 131.66±9.47ab | 63.82±1.74c | 54.11±1.51c | 1.18±0.04bc | 11.98±0.27a |
处理 Treatment | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%) | 可滴定酸 Titratable acidity (%) | VC (mg/100g) | 固酸比 Solid acid ratio | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 11.66±0.89bc | 11.35±0.12bc | 0.58±0.05bc | 5.53±0.16c | 20.15±1.56bc | 19.70±1.55bc |
J1 | 12.90±0.46a | 11.38±0.07bc | 0.39±0.02d | 6.12±0.06ab | 33.32±2.27a | 29.38±1.85a |
J2 | 13.10±0.97a | 11.70±0.04a | 0.36±0.02d | 6.20±0.10ab | 34.64±2.00a | 32.46±2.06a |
J3 | 13.21±0.09a | 11.41±0.06b | 0.38±0.04d | 6.03±0.06abc | 36.66±2.43a | 30.35±2.98a |
J4 | 12.60±0.46ab | 11.72±0.06a | 0.57±0.03c | 5.91±0.06abc | 22.24±0.91b | 20.71±0.90b |
J5 | 11.34±0.14c | 11.23±0.04cd | 0.64±0.03ab | 6.41±0.06a | 17.68±0.83c | 17.49±0.81bc |
J6 | 11.27±0.09c | 11.10±0.06d | 0.67±0.02a | 5.74±0.06bc | 16.72±0.53c | 16.47±0.49c |
Tab.2 Changes of internal quality of Kuerle Fragrant Pear different concentrations of chitosan treatment
处理 Treatment | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%) | 可滴定酸 Titratable acidity (%) | VC (mg/100g) | 固酸比 Solid acid ratio | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 11.66±0.89bc | 11.35±0.12bc | 0.58±0.05bc | 5.53±0.16c | 20.15±1.56bc | 19.70±1.55bc |
J1 | 12.90±0.46a | 11.38±0.07bc | 0.39±0.02d | 6.12±0.06ab | 33.32±2.27a | 29.38±1.85a |
J2 | 13.10±0.97a | 11.70±0.04a | 0.36±0.02d | 6.20±0.10ab | 34.64±2.00a | 32.46±2.06a |
J3 | 13.21±0.09a | 11.41±0.06b | 0.38±0.04d | 6.03±0.06abc | 36.66±2.43a | 30.35±2.98a |
J4 | 12.60±0.46ab | 11.72±0.06a | 0.57±0.03c | 5.91±0.06abc | 22.24±0.91b | 20.71±0.90b |
J5 | 11.34±0.14c | 11.23±0.04cd | 0.64±0.03ab | 6.41±0.06a | 17.68±0.83c | 17.49±0.81bc |
J6 | 11.27±0.09c | 11.10±0.06d | 0.67±0.02a | 5.74±0.06bc | 16.72±0.53c | 16.47±0.49c |
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 |
---|---|---|---|
单果重 Fruit weight | 0.291 | -0.274 | -0.095 |
纵径 Vertical diameter | 0.261 | 0.537 | -0.043 |
横径 Horizontal diameter | 0.228 | 0.615 | -0.045 |
果形指数 Shape index | 0.327 | -0.239 | 0.022 |
硬度 Hardness | -0.319 | 0.076 | 0.319 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble sugar | 0.332 | -0.004 | 0.190 |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.215 | -0.022 | 0.905 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acidity | -0.338 | -0.048 | 0.092 |
维生素C Vitamin C | 0.284 | -0.437 | -0.080 |
固酸比 Solid acid ratio | 0.343 | 0.015 | -0.083 |
糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | 0.342 | 0.031 | -0.093 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 8.279 | 1.423 | 0.749 |
贡献率 Contribution rates(%) | 75.265 | 12.939 | 6.812 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative variance(%) | 75.265 | 88.204 | 95.017 |
权重 Weight | 0.792 | 0.136 | 0.072 |
Tab.3 Characteristic vector of principal component analysis of fruit quality index
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 |
---|---|---|---|
单果重 Fruit weight | 0.291 | -0.274 | -0.095 |
纵径 Vertical diameter | 0.261 | 0.537 | -0.043 |
横径 Horizontal diameter | 0.228 | 0.615 | -0.045 |
果形指数 Shape index | 0.327 | -0.239 | 0.022 |
硬度 Hardness | -0.319 | 0.076 | 0.319 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble sugar | 0.332 | -0.004 | 0.190 |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.215 | -0.022 | 0.905 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acidity | -0.338 | -0.048 | 0.092 |
维生素C Vitamin C | 0.284 | -0.437 | -0.080 |
固酸比 Solid acid ratio | 0.343 | 0.015 | -0.083 |
糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | 0.342 | 0.031 | -0.093 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 8.279 | 1.423 | 0.749 |
贡献率 Contribution rates(%) | 75.265 | 12.939 | 6.812 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative variance(%) | 75.265 | 88.204 | 95.017 |
权重 Weight | 0.792 | 0.136 | 0.072 |
处理 Treatment | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 综合排名 Integ- rated rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -2.391 | 2.068 | 0.268 | -1.294 | 5 |
J1 | 1.725 | -0.955 | -0.600 | 1.022 | 3 |
J2 | 3.816 | 0.022 | 0.489 | 3.535 | 1 |
J3 | 3.120 | 0.798 | -0.743 | 2.871 | 2 |
J4 | -0.550 | -0.568 | 1.629 | -0.262 | 4 |
J5 | -2.746 | -1.537 | -0.329 | -3.098 | 7 |
J6 | -2.974 | 0.173 | -0.713 | -2.775 | 6 |
Tab.4 Comprehensive quality evaluation of different concentrations of chitosan treatment
处理 Treatment | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 综合排名 Integ- rated rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -2.391 | 2.068 | 0.268 | -1.294 | 5 |
J1 | 1.725 | -0.955 | -0.600 | 1.022 | 3 |
J2 | 3.816 | 0.022 | 0.489 | 3.535 | 1 |
J3 | 3.120 | 0.798 | -0.743 | 2.871 | 2 |
J4 | -0.550 | -0.568 | 1.629 | -0.262 | 4 |
J5 | -2.746 | -1.537 | -0.329 | -3.098 | 7 |
J6 | -2.974 | 0.173 | -0.713 | -2.775 | 6 |
[1] | 刘妮, 陶书田, 张绍铃, 等. 授粉品种对‘库尔勒香梨’果实萼片宿存及品质的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2011, 34(3):43-47. |
LIU Ni, TAO Shutian, ZHANG Shaoling, et al. Effect of different pollinizer varieties on calyx retention andquality for ‘Korla Fruit’[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011, 34(3):43-47. | |
[2] | 张倩. 影响库尔勒香梨开花与果实生长的气象条件分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2013. |
ZHANG Qian. Analysis of the effect of meteorological conditions on the flowering and fruit growth of Korla Fragrant Pear[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Normal University, 2013. | |
[3] | 羊坚, 杨慧鹏, 谢伟, 等. 库尔勒香梨无人机辅助液体授粉花粉液参数优选及经济效益分析[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(10):1691-1698. |
YANG Jian, YANG Huipeng, XIE Wei, et al. Parameter optimization and economic analysis of UAV assisted liquid pollination for Korla Fragrant Pear[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(10):1691-1698. | |
[4] |
Liu Y, Wang S, Lan W. Fabrication of polylachic acid/carbon nanotubes/chitosan composite fibers by electrospinning for strawberry preservation[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 121:1329-1336.
DOI URL |
[5] |
LIU Hai, ZHENG Zhihong, HAN Xue, et al. Chitosan Soaking Improves Seed Germination of PlatycodonGrandiflorus and Enhances Its Growth, Photosynthesis, Resistance, Yield, and Quality[J]. Horticulturae, 2022, 8(10): 943.
DOI URL |
[6] |
E.Barka, P.Eullaffroy, C.Clément, et al. Chitosan improves development, and protects Vitis vinifera L.against Botrytis cinerea[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2003, 22(8):608-614.
DOI URL |
[7] | 刘扣生, 寿森炎, 徐春梅, 等. 几丁聚糖对青花菜酚类物质及品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2004,(1):65-67. |
LIU Kousheng, SHOU Senyan, XU Chunmei, et al. Effects of chitosan on phenolic compounds and quality of broccoli[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2004,(1):65-67. | |
[8] | 刘锋, 陈明, 陈金印. 壳聚糖处理时间对脐橙的保鲜效果[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2010, 36(7):183-187. |
LIU Feng, CHEN Ming, CHEN Jinyin. Effects of chitosan treatment time on preservation of navel orange[J]. Food and Fermentation Industry, 2010, 36(7):183-187. | |
[9] | 羊坚. 库尔勒香梨授粉花粉保存、梨火疫病菌检测及无人机授粉花粉液参数组合优选[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2021. |
YANG Jian. Study on preservation of pollinated pollen, detection of pear fire blight and parameters combination of UAV pollination fluid of Koral Fragrant Pear[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2021. | |
[10] | 杨哲. 枣实生与杂交后代群体主要性状的遗传变异分析[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2019. |
YANG Zhe. Analysis of Genetic variation of main characters in jujube off spring populations[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2019. | |
[11] | Sun Z, Li Y, Zhou J, Zhu S H. Effects of exogenous nitricoxide on contents of soluble sugars and related enzyme activities in Feicheng peach fruit[J]. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 2011, 91(10):1795-1800. |
[12] | 张振铭, 胡化广, 孟伟. 不同品种梨花粉萌发的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(13):5941-5942. |
ZHANG Zhenming, HU Huaguang, MENG Wei. Research on the germination of pollens from different pear varieties[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(13):5941-5942. | |
[13] | 李芳芳, 张绍铃, 张虎平, 等. 不同梨品种花粉量及花粉萌发率差异研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(5):27-32. |
LI Fangfang, ZHANG Shaoling, ZHANG Huping, et al. Cluster analysis for the quantity and germinating characteristics of the pollens from different pear cultivars[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013, 36(5):27-32. | |
[14] |
李黎, 冯丹丹, 潘慧, 等. 猕猴桃花粉灭菌方法比较及对果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4):769-777.
DOI |
LI Li, FENG Dandan, PAN Hui, et al. Comparison of sterilization methods for kiwifruit pollen and its effect on fruit quality[J]. Acta Horticulture Sinica, 2022, 49(4):769-777. | |
[15] | 陈静, 秦栋, 杨新雨, 等. 不同植物生长调节物质对蓝果忍冬果实脱落及果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2022, 39(11):2113-2123. |
CHEN Jing, QIN Dong, YANG Xinyu, et al. Effects of different plant growth regulators on abscission and quality of lonicera caeruleaberel fruit[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2022, 39(11):2113-2123. | |
[16] | 马泽跃, 黄战, 陈波浪, 等. 不同施氮水平下库尔勒香梨园土壤微生物量与产量、品质的相关性[J]. 果树学报, 2022, 39(11):2046-2055. |
MA Zeyue, HUANG Zhan, CHEN Bolang, et al. Correlation between the soil microbial biomass and yield and quality in Korla Fragrant Pear orchard with different nitrogen application[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2022, 39(11):2046-2055. | |
[17] | 赵丹, 琚艳君, 马雪, 等. 新疆库尔勒香梨品质分析与评价[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(20):6637-6644. |
ZHAO Dan, JU Yanjun, MA Xue, et al. Quality analysis and evaluation of Korla Fragrant Pear in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality Inspection, 2022, 13(20):6637-6644. |
[1] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[2] | LIU Yufang, ZHANG Zhigang, LI Changcheng, LI Hong, CHENG Ping, YANG Lu. Effects of different temperature and maturity on rot rate and quality of apricot during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197. |
[3] | GONG Duorui, YANG Liling, HAN Jiang, YANG Zhongqiang, LIU Jia, WEN Yu, ZHU Zhanjiang, CUI Kuanbo. Effects of simulated cold chain transport on cell membrane lipid peroxidation and quality of apricot fruit during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2198-2207. |
[4] | LI Ziqin, CHEN Ya, LI Wenqi, JIA Wenting, GUO Huijing, SONG Fangyuan, ZHAO Zhiyong, LIU Chengjiang. Effects of different precooling methods combined with H2O2 treatment on the quality of lvtangxin winter jujube during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215. |
[5] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[6] | HAN Shouan, WANG Min, Maihemuti Turupu, XIE Hui, Aiermaike Caikasimu, LIU Jiale, ZHANG Wen, PAN Mingqi. Effects of different light quality treatments on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903. |
[7] | XIAO Lele, LI Zhiqiang, YE Jun, PU Min, RUAN Xiangyang, LIU Huaijin. Effects of combined application of peptide fertilizer and magnesium on quality and yield of suntianni seedless grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1904-1912. |
[8] | ZHANG Chao, BAI Yungang, ZHENG Ming, XIAO Jun, DING Ping. Synergistic effect of water and fertilizer on grape in extreme arid area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939. |
[9] | WANG Ping, KONG Na, PAN Yan, SUN Xiping, XU Bin, ZHANG Ting. Effects of chlorine dioxide fumigation treatments on the storage of fresh walnuts [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1940-1949. |
[10] | ZHENG Heyun, YAO Jun, LI Chao, ZHANG Cuihuan, GENG Xinli. Effects of storage temperatures on melon quality and the establishment of prediction models [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1950-1957. |
[11] | PU Min, RUAN Xiangyang, XIAO Lele, SUO Changkai, CHEN Guoyong, YE Jun, GAO Bo. Effect of citric acid soluble calcium magnesium fertilizer on calcium and magnesium absorption and quality of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1987-1995. |
[12] | DUAN Songjiang, PENG Zengying, SHEN Yingying, Mulidier Baibolati, WU Yifan, CUI jianping, ZHANG Jusong. Responses of seed cotton yield and fiber quality of different sea island cotton varieties to nitrogen fertilizer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1569-1579. |
[13] | LIANG Zhiguo, WANG Zepeng, JIA Songnan, FAN Fengcui, LIU Shengyao, ZHANG Zhe, DU Fenghuan, QIN Yong. Effects of different soil moisture on growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of greenhouse eggplant [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1713-1721. |
[14] | Sailitanati Saidakebaier, ZHONG Wen, YU Runze. Pollination biology of Tamarix karelinii Bunge(Tamaricaceae) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1756-1765. |
[15] | WANG Wentao, WU Bo, TAI Hongzhong, LIAN Wenming, DAI Cuirong, LI Shuangjiang, PU Yanmei. Effects of different sowing dates on cotton growth in aral reclamation area, Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||