Effects of Tannin Additive on Performance and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Fattening Sheep

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.028

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tannin additives on performance and blood biochemical parameters in fattening sheep.【Method】 In the experiment， 30 fattening sheep aged five months and weighing 25~30 kg were randomly divided into three groups with ten replicates in each group. They were blank control group: group A， fed basal diet； experimental group: group B supplemented with 10 g/d tannin in basal diet and group C supplemented with 15 g/d tannin in basal diet. The prefeeding period of the trial was 7 days， the positive feeding period was 42 days， and the entire trial period was 49 days. At the end of feeding， their growth performance， closely related serum biochemical parameters and apparent digestibility of nutrients were measured. 【Result】 The daily gain of group B and C was higher than that of group A； compared with group A， the alanine aminotransferase level of group B and C was significantly increased （P<0.05）； the serum biochemical indicators such as total protein， albumin， globulin， creatinine and glucose of group B and C were not significantly affected； compared with group A， the alkaline phosphatase content of group B was significantly increased （P<0.05）， with no significant difference in group C； the apparent digestibility of crude protein of group B was lower than that of groups A and C（P>0.05）， and there were no significant differences in the apparent digestibility of dry matter， crude fat， calcium and NDF.【Conclusion】 The addition of 10 and 15 g/d tannin additives to the grain of fattening sheep days could improve the performance of fattening sheep and had a greater effect on the contents of alanine aminotransferase， alkaline phosphatase， urea and crude protein.

Key words: tannin; fattening sheep; serumbiochemical index; production performance; apparent digestibility

摘要：

【目的】 研究单宁添加剂对育肥羊生产性能、血液生化指标和养分消化率的影响。【方法】 选择30只五月龄，体重为25~30 kg的育肥羊随机分成3组,每组10个重复。分别是空白对照组：A组，饲喂基础日粮；试验组：B组在基础日粮中添加10 g/d单宁，C组在基础日粮中添加15 g/d单宁。试验预饲期为7 d，正饲期为42 d，整个试验周期为 49 d。饲喂结束后，检测其生长性能、相关血清生化指标和营养物质表观消化率。【结果】 B组和C组的日增重都高于A组；与A组相比，B组和C组的谷丙转氨酶水平显著提高（P<0.05）；B组和C组的总蛋白、白蛋白、球蛋白、肌酐和葡萄糖等血清生化指标均无显著影响；与A组相比，B组的碱性磷酸酶含量显著提高（P<0.05），C组差异不显著；B组的粗蛋白表观消化率低于A、C两组（P>0.05），干物质、粗脂肪、钙和NDF等的表观消化率均无显著差异。【结论】 在育肥羊日粮中添加10、15 g/d单宁添加剂可以改善育肥羊的生产性能，对谷丙转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、尿素和粗蛋白含量的影响较大。

关键词: 单宁, 育肥羊, 血清生化指标, 生产性能, 表观消化率

CLC Number:

S826

CHEN Xi, ZENG Xiancun, HU Bo, LIU Tong, DAI Liying, NAN Shanshan. Effects of Tannin Additive on Performance and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Fattening Sheep[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2318-2323.

陈锡, 曾献存, 胡波, 刘彤, 戴丽颖, 南珊珊. 单宁添加剂对育肥羊生产性能、血清生化指标和养分消化率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2318-2323.

Figures/Tables 4

References 25

[1]	樊慧丽, 付文阁. 我国羊肉市场价格波动分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2020,(10):1-6.
	FAN Huili, FU Wenge. Analysis of Market Price Fluctuation of Lamb in China[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry Veterinarian, 2020,(10):1-6.
[2]	周艳华, 巩月新, 刘国明. 浅谈圈养育肥羊的发展前景[J]. 吉林畜牧兽医, 2019, 40(2):38,40.
	ZHOU Yanhua, GONG Xinyue, LIU Guoming. Development Prospect of Raising Fattening Sheep in Pens[J]. Jilin animal husbandry veterinarian, 2019, 40(2):38,40.
[3]	Yi M L, Ping X, et al. Tannins and nitrogen dynamics in mangrove leaves at different age and decay stages(Jiulong River Estuary,China)[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2007, 538(1):285-295.
[4]	瞿王龙, 杨小鹏, 张存涛, 等. 干旱、半干旱地区天然草原灌木及其肥岛效应研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4):201-207.
	QU Wanglong, YANG Xiaopeng, ZHANG Cuntao, et al. Research Progress on Natural Grassland Shrub and Its Fertilizer Island Effect in Arid and Semi-arid Areas[J]. Journal of Grass Industry, 2015, 24(4):201-207.
[5]	QIAN qianHuang, XIU liLiu, GUO qiZhao, TIAN mingHu, YU xi Wang. Potential and challenges of tannins as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics for farm animal production[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2018, 4(2).
[6]	Byeng R.Min, Sandra Solaiman, Heidi M.Waldrip, David Parker, Richard W.Todd, DavidBrauer. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2020, 6(3):231-246. DOI PMID
[7]	Wang Y, Mcallister T A, Acharya S. Condensed Tannins in Sainfoin: Composition, Concentration, and Effects on Nutritive and Feeding Value of SainfoinForage[J]. Crop Science, 2015, 55(1).
[8]	H, Ben, Salem, et al. Effect of early experience and adaptation period on voluntary intake, digestion, and growth in Barbarine lambs given tannin-containing(Acacia cyanophyllaLindl. foliage) or tannin-free (oaten hay) diets[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2005, 122(1-2):59-77. DOI URL
[9]	Tiemann T T, Lascano C E, Wettstein H R, et al. Effect of the tropical tannin-rich shrub legumes Calliandracalothyrsus and Flemingiamacrophylla on methane emission and nitrogen and ener gy balance in growing lambs[J]. ANIMAL-CAMBRIDGE UNIVER SITY PRESS-, 2008, 2(5):790-799.
[10]	杨镒峰, 魏海军. 单宁对反刍动物影响的研究进展[J]. 特产研究, 2010, 32(1):60-64.
	YANG Yifeng, WEI Haijun. Research Progress on Effects of Tannin on Ruminants[J]. Specialty Research, 2010, 32(1):60-64.
[11]	Min B R, Barry T N, Attwood G T, et al. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review[J]. Animal Feed ence& Technology, 2003, 106(1-4):3-19.
[12]	YU xi, WANG, and, et al. Frothy bloat in ruminants: Cause, occurrence, and mitigation strategies[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2012, 172(1-2):103-114. DOI URL
[13]	WANG Y, Douglas G B, Waghorn G C, et al. Effect of condensed tannins in Lotus corniculatus upon lactation performance in ewes[J]. Journal of Agricultural ence, 1996, 1269(3):353-362.
[14]	T, N, Barry. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 1986,(55):123—137.
[15]	刘立成, 刘娣, 邹红菲, 等. 单宁酸对奶牛生产性能及甲烷排放的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2014, 35(17):108- 111.
	LIU Licheng, LIU di, ZHOU Hongfei, et al. Effects of Tannic Acid on Production Performance and Methane Emission of Dairy Cows[J]. Feed industry, 2014, 35(17):108- 111.
[16]	卢珍珍, 郑琛, 李发弟, 李冲, 等. 葡萄渣对羔羊生产性能、屠宰性能和养分消化代谢的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4): 114-120.
	LU Zhenzhen, ZHEN Chen, LI Fadi, et al. Effects of grape residue on lamb performance, slaughter performance and nutrient digestion and metabolism[J]. Journal of Grass Industry, 2015, 24(4): 114-120.
[17]	Rivera-Méndez C, PlascenciaA, Torrentera N, et al. Effect of level and source of supplemental tannin on growth performance of steers during the late finishing phase[J]. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2017, 45(1):199-203. DOI URL
[18]	郝科兴. 日粮消化能水平对育肥猪生长性能和血液生化指标的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019.
	HAO Kexin. Effects of Dietary Digestive Energy Levels on Growth Performance and Blood Biochemical Parameters in Fattening Pigs[D]. Shi hezi: Shihezi University, 2019.
[19]	Lucianer E, Silva A S D, Cazarotto C J, et al. Addition of Tannin in Lamb Diets after Weaning: Impact on Performance and Hematological and Biochemical Variables[J]. ActaentiaeVeterinariae, 2019, 47(1).
[20]	任慧波, 单安山, 张永根. 反刍动物过瘤胃蛋白的保护措施[J]. 黄牛杂志, 2003,(4):32-34.
	REN Huibo, SHAN Anshan, ZHANG Yonggen. Protective Measures of Rumen Protein in Ruminants[J]. Cattle Magazine, 2003,(4):32-34.
[21]	郭冬生. 反刍动物蛋白质评定体系研究进展[J]. 中国饲料, 2004(2):5-7,10.
	GUO Dongsheng. Progress in Ruminant Protein Evaluation System[J]. Chinese Feed, 2004(2):5-7+10.
[22]	张晓庆. 红豆草中单宁对饲粮蛋白质保护的效果[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2005.
	ZHANG Xiaoqing. Protective Effect of Tannin in Red Bean Cao on Dietary Protein[D]. Lan zhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2005.
[23]	王敬尧. 单宁对绵羊瘤胃发酵参数、营养物质消化率和甲烷排放量的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019.
	WANG Jingyao. Effects of Tannin on Rumen Fermentation Parameters, Nutrient Digestibility and Methane Emission in Sheep. Hothot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019.
[24]	Tseu R J, Junior F P, Carvalho R F, et al. Effect of tannins and monensin on feeding behaviour, feed intake, digestive parameters and microbial efficiency of nellore cows[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 19(1):262-273. DOI URL
[25]	Patra A K, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2011, 91(1):24-37. DOI PMID

项目 Item	含量 Content
原料组成Raw material composition/%
玉米Corn	56.5
棉粕Cottonseed meal	8
麸皮bran	10
豆粕Soybean meal	6
石粉Stone powder	0.5
食盐salt	1
苜蓿干草alfalfahay	16
预混料^①Premix	2
合计Total	100
营养成分^②Nutrients
粗蛋白质Crude protein（%）	15.62
消化能Digestible energy（MJ/kg）	12.64
钙Ca（%）	0.52
磷P（%）	0.37

项目 Item	含量 Content
原料组成Raw material composition/%
玉米Corn	56.5
棉粕Cottonseed meal	8
麸皮bran	10
豆粕Soybean meal	6
石粉Stone powder	0.5
食盐salt	1
苜蓿干草alfalfahay	16
预混料^①Premix	2
合计Total	100
营养成分^②Nutrients
粗蛋白质Crude protein（%）	15.62
消化能Digestible energy（MJ/kg）	12.64
钙Ca（%）	0.52
磷P（%）	0.37

项目 Item		试验组别 Test group
项目 Item	A组 Group A	B组 Group B	C组 Group C
初始重Initial weight（kg）	28.71±2.06	29.71±1.89	30.29±2.98
末重Final weight（kg）	35.1±1.85	36.14±3.18	37.4±3.02
日增重ADG（g/d）	152±15.14	153±38.69	169±13.62
日采食量ADFI（kg/d）	1.81±0.29	2.05±0.22	2.06±0.5
料重比F/G	11.86±0.87	11.58±0.62	11.55±0.74

项目 Item		试验组别 Test group
项目 Item	A组 Group A	B组 Group B	C组 Group C
初始重Initial weight（kg）	28.71±2.06	29.71±1.89	30.29±2.98
末重Final weight（kg）	35.1±1.85	36.14±3.18	37.4±3.02
日增重ADG（g/d）	152±15.14	153±38.69	169±13.62
日采食量ADFI（kg/d）	1.81±0.29	2.05±0.22	2.06±0.5
料重比F/G	11.86±0.87	11.58±0.62	11.55±0.74

项目 Item		试验组别 Test group
项目 Item	A组 Group A	B组 Group B	C组 Group C
谷丙转氨酶Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase（U/L）	16.59±3.3^b	22.04±3.16^a	21.55±2.46^a
总蛋白Total protein（g/L）	69.63±4.45	70.91±4.55	72.08±2.48
白蛋白Albumin（g/L）	35.53±2.74	37.16±1.60	36.45±1.81
球蛋白Globulin（g/L）	34.10±3.27	33.89±4.54	35.63±3.00
谷草转氨酶Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase（U/L）	91.81±18.62	104.21±23.69	103.97±13.68
碱性磷酸酶Alkaline phosphatase （U/L）	263.86±86.69^b	327.86±78.86^a	273.83±65.97^b
尿素Urea（mmol/L）	3.91±0.82^c	4.69±0.51^b	5.60±0.49^a
肌酐Creatinine（umol/L）	50.71±4.89	53.57±8.24	47.83±6.43
葡萄糖Glucose（mmol/L）	5.23±1.61	7.06±1.55	6.60±1.83
甘油三酯Triglyceride（mmol/L）	0.30±0.08^ab	0.34±0.06^a	0.25±0.07^b