Comprehensive Quality Analysis and Evaluation Oat Varieties under Dry Farming Conditions in Balluk Mountain

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 The purpose of this project is to select the best forage oat cultivars for the dry farming conditions in Balluk Mountain area of Tacheng, Xinjiang by analyzing the agronomic characters and nutritional quality indexes of 21 oat varieties. 【Method】 The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design and repeated three times, with a total of 63 plots.The sowing rate was 240 kg / hm², and the nitrogen application rate was 80 kg/hm².The experiment was【Result】 The fresh grass yields of Baler II (25.28 t/hm²) and Haymaker (24.53 t/hm²) were the highest than those of other oat varieties (P < 0.05).Compared to others, Lena (12.48 t/hm²) and Denmark 440 (12.25 t/hm²) had the highest hay yield (P<0.05).The dry matter contents of Qinghai 444 (35.70%), Bayan 3 (36.13%) and Lena (36.24%) were the highest than other oat cultivars (P<0.05).The crude protein content of Baler (11.84%) and the ether extract content of Qingyan 1 were the highest than other oat cultivars (P<0.05).Bayan 3 (37.90%) and Sweet Oat (37.62%) had the lowest contents of neutral detergent fiber than other oat cultivars (P<0.05).The acid detergent fiber content of Charisma was the lowest (20.73%).The water soluble carbohydrates content of Bayan 3 (13.15%), the crude ash content of Longyan 3 (8.80%) and the relative feeding value of Bayan 3 (169.25) were the highest than other oat varieties (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 According to the comprehensive evaluation of six main indexes of agronomic characters and nutritional quality by membership function analysis, Bayan 3, Sweet Oats and Baler of medium maturity are the most suitable varieties for planting.

Key words: oat; production performance; nutritional quality; membership function analysis

摘要：

【目的】 分析21个燕麦品种农艺性状和营养品质指标,为新疆塔城巴尔鲁克山区旱作条件筛选出最佳饲用燕麦品种提供参考。【方法】 采用随机区组设计,播种量为240 kg/hm²,施氮量为80 kg/hm²,重复3次,共计63个小区。采用隶属函数结合农艺性状和营养品质的6项主要指标进行综合评价。【结果】 品种贝勒二代(25.28 t/hm²)和牧王(24.53 t/hm²)鲜草产量最高(P<0.05)。林纳(12.48 t/hm²)和丹麦440(12.25 t/hm²)干草产量最高(P<0.05)。青海444(35.70%)、巴燕3号(36.13%)和林纳(36.24%)干物质含量最高(P<0.05)。贝勒(11.84%)粗蛋白含量最高(P<0.05)。青燕1号(6.47%)粗脂肪含量最高(P<0.05)。巴燕3号(37.90%)和甜燕麦(37.62%)中性洗涤纤维含量最低(P<0.05)。魅力(20.73%)酸性洗涤纤维含量最低。巴燕3号(13.15%)可溶性碳水化合物含量最高(P<0.05)。陇燕3号(8.80%)粗灰分含量最高(P<0.05)。巴燕3号(169.25)相对饲用价值最高(P<0.05)。【结论】 新疆塔城巴尔鲁克山区旱作条件下,最适宜种植中熟燕麦品种巴燕3号、甜燕麦和贝勒。

关键词: 燕麦, 生产性能, 营养品质, 隶属函数

CLC Number:

S512.6

FU Dongqing, WANG Yanchao, MAO Jiaxiang, YANG Fan, SONG Lei, ZHANG Fanfan, MA Chunhui. Comprehensive Quality Analysis and Evaluation Oat Varieties under Dry Farming Conditions in Balluk Mountain[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 344-352.

付东青, 王彦超, 毛家乡, 杨帆, 宋磊, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 山区旱作条件下不同燕麦品种品质分析及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 344-352.

Figures/Tables 5

References 25

[1]	郭本兆. 中国植物志.第九卷, 第三分册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987.
	GUO Benzhao. Flora of China.Part 3, Volume 9 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1987.
[2]	杨海鹏, 孙泽民. 中国燕麦[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1989.
	YANG Haipeng, SUN Zemin. Chinese oats [M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1989.
[3]	杨茁萌. 品种对燕麦草产量及品质的影响[C]. 中国畜牧业协会. 第三届中国草业大会论文集, 2014: 4
	YANG Zhuomen. Effects of Varieties on oat grass yield and quality[C]. China Animal Husbandry Association. Symposium of the third china grassland congress, 2014: 4.
[4]	Zinn R A. Influence of processing on the feeding value of oats for feedlot cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1993, 71(9):2303-2309. PMID
[5]	梁婷玉, 郞侠, 吴建平, 等. 燕麦与苜蓿不同比例组合对驴盲肠体外发酵的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(6):185-195.
	LIANG Tingyu, LANG Xia, WU Jianping, et al. Effect of different proportions of oat hay and alfalfa on in vitro fermentation in simulated donkey ceca[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(6):185-195.
[6]	武永祯, 张斌, 王霞, 等. 华北燕麦主栽品种生产性能评价与遗传多样性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(3):448-456.
	WU Yongzhen, ZHANG Bin, WANG Xia, et al. Evaluation on productivity performance and genetic diversity of 20 major oat cultivars in north China[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(3):448-456.
[7]	张晴晴, 梁庆伟, 杨秀芳, 等. 12份燕麦品种在阿鲁科尔沁旗地区的生产性能研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(3):1-8.
	ZHANG Qingqing, LING Qinwei, YANG Xiufang, et al. Production performance of 12 oat varieties in the Arukerain banner[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University, 2020, 48(3):1-8.
[8]	丰明, 李韬, 王英杰, 等. 5种燕麦饲草品种在沈阳地区的评价与筛选[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2017, 27(5):11-15.
	FENG Ming, LI Tao, WANG Yingjie, et al. Evaluation and screening of five oat forage varieties in Shenyang[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2017,(5):11-15.
[9]	孙建平, 董宽虎, 蒯晓妍, 等. 晋北农牧交错区引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲用价值比较[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(11):222-230.
	SUN Jianping, DONG Kuanhu, KUAI Xiaoyan, et al. Comparison of productivity and feeding value of introduced oat varieties in the agro-pasture ecotone of northern Shanxi[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(11):222-230.
[10]	李春喜, 叶润荣, 周玉碧, 等. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4):882-888.
	LI Chunxi, YE Runrong, ZHOU Yubi, et al. Research on forage yields and qualities of different oat (Avena sativa) varieties in alpine pastoral regions[J]. Acta Agrcstia Sinica, 2014, 22(4):882-888.
[11]	张光雨, 马和平, 邵小明, 等. 西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5):121-131.
	ZHANG Guangyu, MA Heping, SHAO Xiaoming, et al. A comparative study of yield and nutritive value of nine imported oat varieties in the valley region of Tibet, China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5):121-131.
[12]	于磊, 王新忠, 朱忠和, 等. 兵团农九师161团天然草地牧草资源及其饲用评价[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 4(1):43-49.
	YU Lei, WANG Xinzhong, ZU Zhonghe, et al. On the natural grass resources and feeding value of state farm NO.161[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 2000,(1):43-49.
[13]	刘红玲, 陈明辉, 鲁为华, 等. 巴尔鲁克山天然割草场植物群落分类及群落边界检测[J]. 北方园艺, 2010, 13(3):62-66.
	LIU Honglin, CHENG Minghui, LU Weihua, et al. Flora classification and boundary detection of the nature mowing pasture of Baerluk mountain[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010, 13(3):62-66.
[14]	GB/T14924.9-2001.实验动物配合饲料常规营养成分的测定[S].
	GB/T14924.9-2001.The measures of conventional nutrients for experimental animal feeds[S].
[15]	陈艳, 王之盛, 张晓明, 等. 常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(5):117-125.
	CHENG Yan, WANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Xiaoming, et al. Analysis of the nutritional components and feeding values of commonly used roughages[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(5):117-125.
[16]	张凡凡, 于磊, 张前兵, 等. 沙尔套山天然割草场主要豆科牧草营养价值综合评价研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014, 51(10):1907-1915.
	ZHANG Fanfan, YU Lei, ZHANG Qianbing, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the main legume forages' nutritional value of natural mowing steppe in Shaertao Mountain[J]. Xinjjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 51(10):1907-1915.
[17]	魏永胜, 梁宗锁, 山仑, 等. 利用隶属函数值法评价苜蓿抗旱性[J]. 草业科学, 2005, 37(6):33-36.
	WEI Yongsheng, LIANG Zongsuo, SHAN Lun, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on alfalfa drought resistance traits by subordinate function values analysis[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 37(6):33-36.
[18]	彭先琴, 周青平, 刘文辉, 等. 川西北高寒地区6个燕麦品种生长特性的比较分析[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5):1208-1217.
	PENG Xianqin, ZHOU Qingping, LIU Wenhui, et al. A comparative analysis of growth characteristics of six oat cultivars in the north-western Sichuan alpine region[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5):1208-1217.
[19]	徐长林. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种生长特性比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(2):280-285.
	XU Changlin. A study on growth characteristics of different cultivars of oat (Avena sativa)in alpine region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(2):280-285.
[20]	周萍萍, 赵军, 颜红海, 等. 播期、播种量与施肥量对裸燕麦籽粒产量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(3):433-441.
	ZHOU Pingping, ZHAO Jun, YAN Honghai, et al. Effects of sowing date, sowing rate and fertilizer rate on grain yield and agronomic characteristics of Aveha sativa[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(3):433-441.
[21]	柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 师尚礼. 7个燕麦品种在甘肃二阴区的适应性评价[J]. 草原与草坪, 2011, 31(2):1-6.
	CHAI Jikuan, ZHAO Guiqin, SHI Shangli. Adaptability evaluation of seven oat varieties in cool semi-humid area of Huajialing, Gansu Province[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2011, 31(2):1-6.
[22]	王桃, 徐长林, 张丽静, 等. 5个燕麦品种和品系不同生育期不同部位养分分布格局[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4):70-81.
	WANG Tao, XU Changlin, ZHANG Lijing, et al. Distribution patterns of nutrients in different positions of 5 oat varieties at different breeding periods[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(4):70-81.
[23]	张清平, 田莉华, 蒋海亮, 等. 甘肃陇东黄土高原一年生饲草生产性能综合评价研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(2):25-28.
	ZHANG Qingping, TIAN Lihua, JIANG Hailiang, et al. Comprehensive comprehensive evaluation of production performance of annual forage crops in Longdong loess plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(2):25-28.
[24]	宫玉霞, 徐海, 石红梅, 等. 海拔对不同燕麦品种产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国牛业科学, 2019, 45(2):9-11.
	GONG Yuxia, XU Hai, SHI Hongmei, et al. Effects of altitude yield and quality of different oat varieties[J]. China Cattle Science, 2019, 45(2):9-11.
[25]	赵怡然, 高峰, 白倩, 等. 山东地区宜栽燕麦品种筛选[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 35(1):22-26.
	ZHAO Yiran, GAO Feng, BAI Qian, et al. Screening of suitable oat varieties for early spring cultivation in Shandong province[J]. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2018, 35(1):22-26.

燕麦品种 Oat varieties	来源 Source	品种特点 Variety charac teristics	种子千粒重 Thousand grain weigth (g)	发芽率 Germin ation rate(%)
丹麦440 Denmark 440	中国甘肃	早熟	37.58	80
青海444 Qinghai 444	中国青海	早熟	32.11	80
青引1号 Qingyin 1	中国青海	早熟	35.36	80
青燕1号 Qingyan 1	中国青海	早熟	34.55	90
领袖 Souris	加拿大	早熟	37.12	95
加燕2号 Jiayan 2	加拿大	早中熟	29.75	95
陇燕2号 Longyan 2	中国甘肃	早中熟	31.48	95
贝勒 Baler	加拿大	中熟	38.73	95
白燕7号 Baiyan 7	中国吉林	中熟	31.20	90
巴燕3号 Bayan 3	中国青海	中熟	30.99	85
甜燕麦 Sweet oat	中国青海	中熟	29.56	85
陇燕3号 Longyan 3	中国甘肃	中熟	33.08	90
魅力 Charisma	美国	中熟	27.14	85
燕王 Forage plus	美国	中熟	32.21	90
美达 Monida	美国	中熟	30.36	85
太阳神 Titan	美国	中熟	24.77	95
贝勒二代 Baler II	加拿大	晚熟	32.86	90
林纳 Lena	挪威	晚熟	28.93	95
伽利略 Galileo	澳洲	晚熟	29.52	85
牧王 Haymaker	加拿大	晚熟	31.50	90
爱沃 Ever	美国	晚熟	25.77	90

燕麦品种 Oat varieties	来源 Source	品种特点 Variety charac teristics	种子千粒重 Thousand grain weigth (g)	发芽率 Germin ation rate(%)
丹麦440 Denmark 440	中国甘肃	早熟	37.58	80
青海444 Qinghai 444	中国青海	早熟	32.11	80
青引1号 Qingyin 1	中国青海	早熟	35.36	80
青燕1号 Qingyan 1	中国青海	早熟	34.55	90
领袖 Souris	加拿大	早熟	37.12	95
加燕2号 Jiayan 2	加拿大	早中熟	29.75	95
陇燕2号 Longyan 2	中国甘肃	早中熟	31.48	95
贝勒 Baler	加拿大	中熟	38.73	95
白燕7号 Baiyan 7	中国吉林	中熟	31.20	90
巴燕3号 Bayan 3	中国青海	中熟	30.99	85
甜燕麦 Sweet oat	中国青海	中熟	29.56	85
陇燕3号 Longyan 3	中国甘肃	中熟	33.08	90
魅力 Charisma	美国	中熟	27.14	85
燕王 Forage plus	美国	中熟	32.21	90
美达 Monida	美国	中熟	30.36	85
太阳神 Titan	美国	中熟	24.77	95
贝勒二代 Baler II	加拿大	晚熟	32.86	90
林纳 Lena	挪威	晚熟	28.93	95
伽利略 Galileo	澳洲	晚熟	29.52	85
牧王 Haymaker	加拿大	晚熟	31.50	90
爱沃 Ever	美国	晚熟	25.77	90

燕麦品种 Oat varieties	生育期 Growth period (d)	鲜草产量 Fresh grass yield (t/hm²)	干草产量 Hay yield (t/hm²)	株高 Plant height (cm)
丹麦440 Denmark 440	87	22.30±0.14^b	12.25±0.08^a	106.08±0.39^c
青海444 Qinghai 444	90	13.40±0.85^h	8.17±0.52^efg	94.83±0.71^fg
青引1号 Qingyin 1	90	17.50±0.71^ef	7.44±0.26^g	108.04±1.37^a
青燕1号 Qingyan 1	90	14.30±0.14^h	7.42±0.08^g	96.33±1.01^f
领袖 Souris	90	20.00±1.41^cd	9.67±0.69^de	86.22±0.10^k
加燕2号 Jiayan 2	92	16.26±0.37^g	7.72±0.17^fg	88.28±0.72^j
陇燕2号 Longyan 2	92	16.10±0.42^g	7.63±0.21^g	107.98±1.19^a
贝勒 Baler	96	18.75±1.49^de	9.12±1.29^de	104.03±1.12^cd
白燕7号 Baiyan 7	96	17.80±0.57^ef	8.02±0.25^efg	105.32±1.00^cd
巴燕3号 Bayan 3	96	17.14±0.20^ef	9.96±0.11^cd	107.96±1.24^a
甜燕麦 Sweet oat	96	19.90±0.71^cd	10.31±0.36^cd	95.23±1.47^fg
陇燕3号 Longyan 3	94	21.20±0.57^bc	10.06±0.21^cd	93.18±0.06^gh
魅力 Charisma	94	18.90±0.14^de	9.01±0.06^def	89.61±0.53^ij
燕王 Forage plus	96	14.22±0.25^h	7.40±0.13^g	103.86±3.48^d
美达 Monida	96	17.50±0.14^ef	9.98±0.08^cd	91.4±0.89^hi
太阳神 Titan	96	13.20±1.13^h	5.99±0.52^h	109.11±1.56^a
贝勒二代 Baler II	100	25.28±1.30^a	10.81±1.15^c	97.26±0.66^ef
林纳 Lena	98	20.95±1.06^bc	12.48±0.64^a	93.54±0.46^gh
伽利略 Galileo	100	13.80±0.28^h	7.45±0.15^g	106.97±0.49^b
牧王 Haymaker	105	24.53±1.24^a	11.56±0.28^b	103.41±0.84^d
爱沃 Ever	115	16.40±0.57^g	8.50±0.20^h	99.52±0.84^e

燕麦品种 Oat varieties	生育期 Growth period (d)	鲜草产量 Fresh grass yield (t/hm²)	干草产量 Hay yield (t/hm²)	株高 Plant height (cm)
丹麦440 Denmark 440	87	22.30±0.14^b	12.25±0.08^a	106.08±0.39^c
青海444 Qinghai 444	90	13.40±0.85^h	8.17±0.52^efg	94.83±0.71^fg
青引1号 Qingyin 1	90	17.50±0.71^ef	7.44±0.26^g	108.04±1.37^a
青燕1号 Qingyan 1	90	14.30±0.14^h	7.42±0.08^g	96.33±1.01^f
领袖 Souris	90	20.00±1.41^cd	9.67±0.69^de	86.22±0.10^k
加燕2号 Jiayan 2	92	16.26±0.37^g	7.72±0.17^fg	88.28±0.72^j
陇燕2号 Longyan 2	92	16.10±0.42^g	7.63±0.21^g	107.98±1.19^a
贝勒 Baler	96	18.75±1.49^de	9.12±1.29^de	104.03±1.12^cd
白燕7号 Baiyan 7	96	17.80±0.57^ef	8.02±0.25^efg	105.32±1.00^cd
巴燕3号 Bayan 3	96	17.14±0.20^ef	9.96±0.11^cd	107.96±1.24^a
甜燕麦 Sweet oat	96	19.90±0.71^cd	10.31±0.36^cd	95.23±1.47^fg
陇燕3号 Longyan 3	94	21.20±0.57^bc	10.06±0.21^cd	93.18±0.06^gh
魅力 Charisma	94	18.90±0.14^de	9.01±0.06^def	89.61±0.53^ij
燕王 Forage plus	96	14.22±0.25^h	7.40±0.13^g	103.86±3.48^d
美达 Monida	96	17.50±0.14^ef	9.98±0.08^cd	91.4±0.89^hi
太阳神 Titan	96	13.20±1.13^h	5.99±0.52^h	109.11±1.56^a
贝勒二代 Baler II	100	25.28±1.30^a	10.81±1.15^c	97.26±0.66^ef
林纳 Lena	98	20.95±1.06^bc	12.48±0.64^a	93.54±0.46^gh
伽利略 Galileo	100	13.80±0.28^h	7.45±0.15^g	106.97±0.49^b
牧王 Haymaker	105	24.53±1.24^a	11.56±0.28^b	103.41±0.84^d
爱沃 Ever	115	16.40±0.57^g	8.50±0.20^h	99.52±0.84^e

燕麦品种 Oat varieties	干物质 Dry matter (%)	粗蛋白 Crude protein (DM %)	粗脂肪 Ether extract (DM %)	中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber(DM %)	酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber(DM %)	可溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrates (DM %)	粗灰分 Crude ash (DM %)	相对饲用价值 Relative feeding value
丹麦440 Denmark 440	30.79±0.40^c	9.73±0.12^ef	4.89±0.01^g	50.28±0.26^cde	25.51±0.87^cd	10.95±0.43^d	6.97±0.04^g	127.71±1.70^hi
青海444 Qinghai 444	35.70±0.46^a	8.76±0.14^g	4.28±0.07^jk	45.02±0.45^gh	22.30±0.09^hi	9.09±0.11^g	6.57±0.03^hi	147.79±1.36^e
青引1号 Qingyin 1	22.12±0.48^j	9.70±0.06^f	5.28±0.07^ef	50.24±0.08^cde	25.37±0.05^cd	9.96±0.01^f	6.27±0.06^j	128.02±0.23^hi
青燕1号 Qingyan 1	29.83±0.27^d	9.88±0.09^def	6.47±0.23^a	48.09±1.13^f	24.44±0.39^de	11.03±0.02^d	7.08±0.04^fg	135.19±3.67^g
领袖 Souris	24.77±0.47^fg	8.77±0.17^g	5.28±0.08^ef	52.41±0.15^bc	27.67±1.22^b	11.02±0.13^d	7.74±0.08^c	119.54±1.96^k
加燕2号 Jiayan 2	24.63±0.51^gh	8.09±0.05^h	4.50±0.19^hi	51.41±0.31^bc	23.59±0.06^efg	11.71±0.22^c	8.29±0.03^b	124.45±0.93^j
陇燕2号 Longyan 2	24.43±0.63^gh	7.90±0.09^h	5.67±0.01^d	48.78±0.88^def	24.32±0.64^def	10.75±0.02^de	7.18±0.02^f	133.43±2.62^g
贝勒 Baler	26.52±0.42^e	11.84±0.10^a	4.36±0.01^ij	40.18±0.05^k	22.42±0.12^ghi	10.38±0.04^e	7.34±0.01^e	165.04±0.89^b
白燕7号 Baiyan 7	22.94±0.2ⁱ	7.25±0.10ⁱ	5.14±0.03^f	50.71±0.47^bcd	22.54±0.12^ghi	12.71±0.02^b	6.69±0.03^h	129.74±1.37^h
巴燕3号 Bayan 3	36.13±0.19^a	10.54±0.01^c	4.94±0.07^g	37.90±0.07^l	25.51±0.14^cd	13.15±0.02^a	5.53±0.12^l	169.25±0.22^a
甜燕麦 Sweet oat	29.64±0.48^d	11.30±0.07^b	4.28±0.08^jk	37.62±0.06^l	27.45±0.18^b	12.59±0.05^b	5.25±0.04^m	166.15±0.13^b
陇燕3号 Longyan 3	25.37±0.56^f	10.28±0.07^cde	4.35±0.02^ij	59.28±0.98^a	29.02±0.50^a	7.87±0.13ⁱ	8.80±0.04^a	104.04±1.15^m
魅力 Charisma	26.06±0.23^e	9.04±0.03^g	4.16±0.01^k	42.46±0.18^ij	20.73±0.28^j	11.5±0.12^c	5.81±0.04^k	159.39±1.00^c
燕王 Forage plus	30.68±0.53^c	7.99±1.33^h	6.26±0.01^b	48.31±1.19^ef	26.20±0.11^c	9.04±0.33^g	6.70±0.04^h	139.17±0.92^f
美达 Monida	34.85±0.41^b	7.69±0.03^hi	5.96±0.04^c	52.56±0.30^b	29.03±0.55^a	10.62±0.23^de	7.72±0.02^c	117.33±0.88^k
太阳神 Titan	23.94±0.16^h	9.89±0.06^def	4.67±0.01^h	43.59±0.06^hi	21.44±0.19^ij	10.52±0.08^e	6.13±0.08^j	153.47±1.26^d
贝勒二代 Baler II	21.28±0.35^k	8.05±0.07^h	5.28±0.06^ef	51.3±0.08^bc	25.12±1.32^cd	9.35±0.34^g	5.09±0.03ⁿ	125.72±1.75^ij
林纳 Lena	36.24±0.33^a	9.89±0.09 d^ef	5.24±0.03^ef	60.02±0.50^a	23.12±1.57^fgh	9.11±0.40^g	7.50±0.21^d	109.87±2.70^l
伽利略 Galileo	31.06±0.35^c	10.30±0.04^cd	6.18±0.08^b	45.94±1.01^g	21.37±0.21^ij	8.46±0.04^h	7.07±0.07^fg	146.35±2.87^e
牧王 Haymaker	24.68±0.46^fg	6.56±0.06ⁱ	5.34±0.03^e	40.74±0.79^jk	23.63±0.12^efg	8.39±0.63^h	6.47±0.01ⁱ	161.00±2.94^c
爱沃 Ever	22.76±0.2^ij	8.18±0.07^h	6.24±0.11^b	42.15±0.69^ij	23.43±1.58^efg	8.52±0.04^h	7.35±0.01^e	155.95±2.85^d