Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 1598-1605.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.005
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
HOU Xianfei1(), MIAO Haocui1(), LI Qiang1(), GU Yuanguo1, JIA Donghai1, SHI Bixian1, LIN Ping2
Received:
2021-10-07
Online:
2022-07-20
Published:
2022-08-04
Correspondence author:
MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang
Supported by:
侯献飞1(), 苗昊翠1(), 李强1(), 顾元国1, 贾东海1, 石必显1, 林萍2
通讯作者:
苗昊翠,李强
作者简介:
侯献飞(1989- ),男,甘肃庆阳人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为油料作物育种与栽培,(E-mail) hou544805196@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
HOU Xianfei, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang, GU Yuanguo, JIA Donghai, SHI Bixian, LIN Ping. Effects of Humic Acid Water-Soluble Fertilizer on Peanut Growth and Yield[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1598-1605.
侯献飞, 苗昊翠, 李强, 顾元国, 贾东海, 石必显, 林萍. 腐植酸水溶肥对花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1598-1605.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.005
处理 Treatment | 播种期 Sowing date | 出苗期 Seedling stage | 花针期 Flowering stage | 结荚期 Pod setting stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 全生育期 Growth period (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月16日 | 7月5日 | 9月14日 | 127 |
S2 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月21日 | 7月7日 | 9月19日 | 132 |
S3 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月22日 | 7月5日 | 9月23日 | 136 |
S4 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月22日 | 7月3日 | 9月17日 | 130 |
S5(CK) | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月19日 | 7月7日 | 9月12日 | 125 |
Table 1 Growth period under different water soluble fertilizer treatments
处理 Treatment | 播种期 Sowing date | 出苗期 Seedling stage | 花针期 Flowering stage | 结荚期 Pod setting stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 全生育期 Growth period (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月16日 | 7月5日 | 9月14日 | 127 |
S2 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月21日 | 7月7日 | 9月19日 | 132 |
S3 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月22日 | 7月5日 | 9月23日 | 136 |
S4 | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月22日 | 7月3日 | 9月17日 | 130 |
S5(CK) | 4月30日 | 5月10日 | 6月19日 | 7月7日 | 9月12日 | 125 |
成份 Index | 2018年 | 2019年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征值 Eigenvalue | 方差的 Variance (%) | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contributionrate(%) | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 方差的 Variance (%) | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contributionrate(%) | |
主茎高 Stem height | 7.678 | 59.062 | 59.062 | 7.40 | 56.89 | 56.89 |
侧枝长 Lateral branch length | 3.255 | 25.036 | 84.097 | 3.59 | 27.64 | 84.53 |
分枝数 Branch number | 1.703 | 13.098 | 97.196 | 1.49 | 11.46 | 95.99 |
叶鲜重 Leaf fresh weight | 0.365 | 2.804 | 100 | 0.52 | 4.01 | 100 |
叶干重 Leaf dry weight | 4.00E-16 | 3.08E-15 | 100 | 3.989E-16 | 3.068E-15 | 100 |
茎鲜重 Stem fresh weight | 2.90E-16 | 2.23E-15 | 100 | 2.72E-16 | 2.092E-15 | 100 |
茎干重 Stem dry weight | 1.99E-16 | 1.53E-15 | 100 | 1.894E-16 | 1.457E-15 | 100 |
荚果鲜重 Fresh weight of pods | 1.43E-16 | 1.10E-15 | 100 | 1.093E-16 | 8.411E-16 | 100 |
荚果干重 Dry weight of pods | 6.48E-17 | 4.99E-16 | 100 | 7.816E-17 | 6.012E-16 | 100 |
幼果数 Number of young fruit | -2.38E-17 | -1.83E-16 | 100 | 3.646E-17 | 2.805E-16 | 100 |
根鲜重 Root fresh weight | -1.71E-16 | -1.32E-15 | 100 | -4.049E-17 | -3.115E-16 | 100 |
根干重 Root dry weight | -2.57E-16 | -1.98E-15 | 100 | -1.837E-16 | -1.413E-15 | 100 |
叶绿素 Chlorophyll | -3.63E-16 | -2.79E-15 | 100 | -2.62E-16 | -2.015E-15 | 100 |
Table 2 Main component analysis eigenvalues
成份 Index | 2018年 | 2019年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征值 Eigenvalue | 方差的 Variance (%) | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contributionrate(%) | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 方差的 Variance (%) | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contributionrate(%) | |
主茎高 Stem height | 7.678 | 59.062 | 59.062 | 7.40 | 56.89 | 56.89 |
侧枝长 Lateral branch length | 3.255 | 25.036 | 84.097 | 3.59 | 27.64 | 84.53 |
分枝数 Branch number | 1.703 | 13.098 | 97.196 | 1.49 | 11.46 | 95.99 |
叶鲜重 Leaf fresh weight | 0.365 | 2.804 | 100 | 0.52 | 4.01 | 100 |
叶干重 Leaf dry weight | 4.00E-16 | 3.08E-15 | 100 | 3.989E-16 | 3.068E-15 | 100 |
茎鲜重 Stem fresh weight | 2.90E-16 | 2.23E-15 | 100 | 2.72E-16 | 2.092E-15 | 100 |
茎干重 Stem dry weight | 1.99E-16 | 1.53E-15 | 100 | 1.894E-16 | 1.457E-15 | 100 |
荚果鲜重 Fresh weight of pods | 1.43E-16 | 1.10E-15 | 100 | 1.093E-16 | 8.411E-16 | 100 |
荚果干重 Dry weight of pods | 6.48E-17 | 4.99E-16 | 100 | 7.816E-17 | 6.012E-16 | 100 |
幼果数 Number of young fruit | -2.38E-17 | -1.83E-16 | 100 | 3.646E-17 | 2.805E-16 | 100 |
根鲜重 Root fresh weight | -1.71E-16 | -1.32E-15 | 100 | -4.049E-17 | -3.115E-16 | 100 |
根干重 Root dry weight | -2.57E-16 | -1.98E-15 | 100 | -1.837E-16 | -1.413E-15 | 100 |
叶绿素 Chlorophyll | -3.63E-16 | -2.79E-15 | 100 | -2.62E-16 | -2.015E-15 | 100 |
指标Index | 2018年 | 2019年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
主茎高Stem height | 0.508 | -0.853 | 0.059 | -0.25 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
侧枝长Lateral branch length | 0.552 | -0.826 | 0.083 | 0.35 | 0.91 | 0.13 |
分枝数Branch number | -0.407 | 0.698 | 0.586 | -0.72 | 0.54 | -0.44 |
叶鲜重Leaf fresh weight | 0.912 | 0.018 | -0.409 | 0.74 | -0.07 | 0.63 |
叶干重Leaf dry weight | 0.914 | 0.019 | -0.309 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.20 |
茎鲜重Stem fresh weight | 0.827 | 0.56 | -0.023 | 0.86 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
茎干重Stem dry weight | 0.742 | 0.641 | -0.181 | 0.52 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
荚果鲜重Fresh weight of pods | 0.992 | 0.113 | -0.054 | 0.97 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
荚果干重Dry weight of pods | 0.965 | 0.228 | -0.002 | 0.96 | 0.08 | 0.19 |
幼果数Number of young fruit | 0.979 | 0.091 | 0.178 | 0.91 | -0.15 | 0.06 |
根鲜重Root fresh weight | 0.912 | -0.06 | 0.339 | -0.83 | 0.37 | 0.38 |
根干重Root dry weight | 0.403 | 0.306 | 0.775 | -0.84 | 0.48 | 0.17 |
叶绿素Chlorophyll | 0.423 | -0.68 | 0.55 | -0.71 | 0.20 | 0.68 |
Table 3 The principal component matrix
指标Index | 2018年 | 2019年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
主茎高Stem height | 0.508 | -0.853 | 0.059 | -0.25 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
侧枝长Lateral branch length | 0.552 | -0.826 | 0.083 | 0.35 | 0.91 | 0.13 |
分枝数Branch number | -0.407 | 0.698 | 0.586 | -0.72 | 0.54 | -0.44 |
叶鲜重Leaf fresh weight | 0.912 | 0.018 | -0.409 | 0.74 | -0.07 | 0.63 |
叶干重Leaf dry weight | 0.914 | 0.019 | -0.309 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.20 |
茎鲜重Stem fresh weight | 0.827 | 0.56 | -0.023 | 0.86 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
茎干重Stem dry weight | 0.742 | 0.641 | -0.181 | 0.52 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
荚果鲜重Fresh weight of pods | 0.992 | 0.113 | -0.054 | 0.97 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
荚果干重Dry weight of pods | 0.965 | 0.228 | -0.002 | 0.96 | 0.08 | 0.19 |
幼果数Number of young fruit | 0.979 | 0.091 | 0.178 | 0.91 | -0.15 | 0.06 |
根鲜重Root fresh weight | 0.912 | -0.06 | 0.339 | -0.83 | 0.37 | 0.38 |
根干重Root dry weight | 0.403 | 0.306 | 0.775 | -0.84 | 0.48 | 0.17 |
叶绿素Chlorophyll | 0.423 | -0.68 | 0.55 | -0.71 | 0.20 | 0.68 |
处理 Treatment | 2018年(Year) | 2019年(Year) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主要成分因子Component facto | 综合得分 General score | 等级 Grade | 主要成分因子Component facto | 综合得分 General score | 等级 Grade | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
S1 | 0.59 | 1.54 | -0.68 | 0.64 | 1 | 1.24 | 1.05 | -0.71 | 0.91 | 1 |
S2 | 0.73 | -1.25 | -1.05 | -0.02 | 3 | 0.64 | -0.44 | 1.61 | 0.43 | 2 |
S3 | -0.66 | 0.03 | 0.43 | -0.32 | 4 | -0.33 | -1.09 | -0.70 | -0.57 | 5 |
S4 | -1.44 | -0.13 | -0.19 | -0.91 | 5 | -0.17 | -0.60 | -0.54 | -0.32 | 3 |
S5 | 0.78 | -0.20 | 1.49 | 0.61 | 2 | -1.38 | 1.08 | 0.34 | -0.45 | 4 |
Table 4 Comprehensive scores for different treatments
处理 Treatment | 2018年(Year) | 2019年(Year) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主要成分因子Component facto | 综合得分 General score | 等级 Grade | 主要成分因子Component facto | 综合得分 General score | 等级 Grade | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
S1 | 0.59 | 1.54 | -0.68 | 0.64 | 1 | 1.24 | 1.05 | -0.71 | 0.91 | 1 |
S2 | 0.73 | -1.25 | -1.05 | -0.02 | 3 | 0.64 | -0.44 | 1.61 | 0.43 | 2 |
S3 | -0.66 | 0.03 | 0.43 | -0.32 | 4 | -0.33 | -1.09 | -0.70 | -0.57 | 5 |
S4 | -1.44 | -0.13 | -0.19 | -0.91 | 5 | -0.17 | -0.60 | -0.54 | -0.32 | 3 |
S5 | 0.78 | -0.20 | 1.49 | 0.61 | 2 | -1.38 | 1.08 | 0.34 | -0.45 | 4 |
[1] | 梁静. 新疆水肥一体化技术应用现状与发展对策[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2015, 38(1) :38-40. |
LIANG Jing. Application status and development countermeasures of integrated water and fertilizer technology in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2015, 38(1): 38-40. | |
[2] | 顾烈烽. 新疆生产建设兵团棉花膜下滴灌技术的形成与发展[J]. 节水灌溉, 2003, (1) :27-29. |
GU Liefeng. Formation and development of cotton drip irrigation technology under film in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2003,(1) :27-29. | |
[3] | 刘军. 新疆农业高效节水灌溉技术长效利用研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2016. |
LIU Jun. Research on long-term utilization of high-efficiency water-saving irrigation technology in Xinjiang agriculture[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[4] | 邓兰生, 张承林, 黄兰芬. 滴灌施氮肥对香蕉生长的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2008,(1):19-22. |
DENG Lansheng, ZHANG Chenglin, HUANG Lanfen. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Drip Irrigation on Banana Growth[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2008,(1):19-22. | |
[5] | 梁海玲, 李文宝, 林明月, 等. 水肥一体化技术对鲜食甜糯玉米生长特性与产量的影响[J]. 广西农业科学, 2010, 41(12):1314-1316. |
LIANG Hailing, LI Wenbao, LIN Mingyue, et al. The effect of water and fertilizer integration technology on the growth characteristics and yield of fresh sweet waxy corn[J]. Guangxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 41(12): 1314-1316. | |
[6] | 邓忠, 白丹, 翟国亮, 等. 膜下滴灌水氮调控对南疆棉花产量及水氮利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(9):2525-2532. |
DENG Zhong, BAI Dan, ZHAI Guoliang, et al. The effect of water and nitrogen regulation under mulch drip irrigation on cotton yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency in southern Xinjiang[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(9): 2525-2532. | |
[7] |
刘欣婷, 王娟, 候献飞, 等. 滴灌条件下水肥耦合对花生干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(11):2013-2021.
DOI |
LIU Xinting, WANG Juan, HOU Xianfei, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on dry matter accumulation and yield of peanut under drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(11):2013-2021.
DOI |
|
[8] | 李锐娟, 姚延双, 申利肖. 含腐植酸水溶肥料在花生上的肥效研究[J]. 基层农技推广, 2015, 3(9):23-24. |
LI Ruijuan, YAO Yanshuang, SHEN Lixiao. Study on the effect of humic acid-containing water-soluble fertilizer on peanut[J]. Basic Agricultural Technology Extension, 2015, 3(9): 23-24. | |
[9] | 谷端银, 吴钦泉, 陈士更, 等. 腐植酸缓释肥料对不同地区花生生长及产量的影响[J]. 腐植酸, 2014,(2):25-28. |
GU Duanyin, WU Qinquan, CHEN Shigeng, et al. The effect of humic acid slow-release fertilizer on the growth and yield of peanuts in different regions[J]. Humic Acid, 2014,(2):25-28. | |
[10] | 刘忠良. 花生荚果籽仁干物质积累规律的研究[J]. 花生学报, 2018, 47(3):71-74. |
LIU Zhongliang. Study on the Dry Matter Accumulation of Peanut Pods and Kernels[J]. Peanut News, 2018, 47(3):71-74. | |
[11] | 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 李德文, 等. “三防三促”调控技术对高产花生农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(6):828-834. |
ZHANG Jialei, GUO Feng, LI Dewen, et al. Effects of "Three Preventions and Three Promotions" Control Technology on Agronomic Traits and Yield of High Yield Peanuts[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crops, 2018, 40(6):828-834. | |
[12] | 武庆慧, 汪洋, 赵亚南, 等. 氮磷钾配比对潮土区高产夏播花生产量、养分吸收和经济效益的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,(2):98-104. |
WU Qinghui, WANG Yang, ZHAO Yanan, et al. The effect of the ratio of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on the yield, nutrient absorption and economic benefits of high-yield summer peanuts in the fluvo-aquic soil area[J]. China Soil and Fertilizers, 2019,(2):98-104. | |
[13] | 何瑞岳. 不同施肥对玉米产量及肥料利用的影响[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2021, 33(1) :42-45. |
HE Ruiyue. Effects of different fertilization on corn yield and fertilizer utilization[J]. China Agricultural Abstracts-Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 33(1):42-45. | |
[14] | 张光岩, 徐良菊, 李俊良, 等. 灌水及肥料配施对夏玉米产量和养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(7):54-59. |
ZHANG Guangyan, XU Liangju, LI Junliang, et al. Effects of irrigation and fertilizer combined application on summer corn yield and nutrient absorption and utilization[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(7):54-59. | |
[15] | 张永亮, 于铁峰, 郝凤, 等. 施肥与混播比例对豆禾混播牧草产量及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11):91-101. |
ZHANG Yongliang, YU Tiefeng, HAO Feng, et al. Effects of the ratio of fertilization and mixed sowing on the yield and utilization efficiency of N, P, and K of mixed soybean and grass[J]. Acta Prata Sinica, 2020, 29(11):91-101. | |
[16] | 王丹丹, 李岚涛, 韩本高, 等. 养分专家系统推荐施肥对冬小麦产量、养分转运及肥料利用的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28 (11):1692-1702. |
WANG Dandan, LI Lantao, HAN Bengao, et al. The effect of fertilizer recommended by nutrient expert system on winter wheat yield, nutrient transfer and fertilizer utilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (Chinese-English), 2020, 28(11):1692-1702. | |
[17] |
李敏, 卜容燕, 韩上, 等. 安徽省冬小麦施肥现状与肥料利用效率[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9):3051-3059.
DOI |
LI Min, BU Rongyan, HAN Shang, et al. The current status of winter wheat fertilization and fertilizer use efficiency in Anhui Province[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(9):3051-3059. | |
[18] | Azhar Hussain, Maqshoof Ahmad, Muhammad Zahid Mumtaz, 等. 腐植酸等有机改良剂和根际促生菌对玉米产量和土壤质量的影响[J]. 腐植酸, 2020,(3):56. |
Azhar Hussain, Maqshoof Ahmad, Muhammad Zahid, et al. The effects of humic acid and other organic modifiers and rhizosphere growth promoting bacteria on corn yield and soil quality[J]. Humic Acid, 2020,(3):56. | |
[19] | 崔双双, 董晓霞, 田慎重, 等. 腐植酸肥料对夏玉米产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 腐植酸, 2020,(3):54. |
CUI Shuangshuang, DONG Xiaoxia, TIAN Shenzhong, et al. Effects of Humic Acid Fertilizer on Summer Corn Yield and Nitrogen Utilization[J]. Humic Acid, 2020,(3):54. | |
[20] | 王敏, 刘石磊, 张帅, 等. 腐植酸钾与磷肥施用方式对土壤磷素移动性的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(2):209-215. |
WANG Min, LIU Shilei, ZHANG Shuai, et al. Effects of potassium humate and phosphate fertilizer application methods on soil phosphorus mobility[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2020, 37(2):209-215. | |
[21] | Li Y, Fang F, Wei J, 矫威. 腐植酸肥料对连作花生土壤性质和土壤微生物多样性的改善[J]. 腐植酸, 2020,(1):95. |
LI Y, FANG F, WEI J, et al. Improvement of humic acid fertilizer on soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut[J]. Humic Acid, 2020,(1):95. | |
[22] | 李春敏. 腐植酸水溶肥料在水稻上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农村科技, 2019,(10):71. |
LI Chunmin. Study on the application effect of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer on rice[J]. Modern Rural Science and Technology, 2019,(10):71. | |
[23] | 林枫, 李艳梅, 孙笑梅, 等. 腐植酸与氮肥配施对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(23):80-85. |
LIN Feng, LI Yanmei, SUN Xiaomei, et al. The effect of humic acid and nitrogen fertilizer on the physical and chemical properties of soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(23):80-85. | |
[24] | 张志华. 含腐植酸肥料配合秸秆施用对葡萄生长发育及土壤肥力的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2017. |
ZHANG Zhihua. The effect of humic acid-containing fertilizer combined with straw application on grape growth and soil fertility[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2017. | |
[25] |
袁天佑, 王俊忠, 冀建华, 等. 施用腐植酸对夏玉米产量、氮素吸收及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(4):794-802.
DOI |
YUAN Tianyou, WANG Junzhong, JI Jianhua, et al. Effects of humic acid application on summer corn yield, nitrogen absorption and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 2017, 31(4): 794-802. |
[1] | HUANG Xiaoshuang, LI Haifeng, Huxidan Maimaiti, Rexidan Amuti, LIU Zhigang, REN Hongsong, SHI Shubing, ZHANG Yu. Effects of peanut intercropping patterns on peanut growth, leaf physiological characteristics and yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2433-2441. |
[2] | YAO Qing, SHI Junjie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, Aribelegan Hazzetti, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Physiological response of 42 creeping peanut cultivars to salt stress at seedling stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2442-2452. |
[3] | DU Shanshan, CHEN Jinrui, LUO Jing, YAO Qingqing, SUN Huijian, HE Zhongsheng, Kurban Yasheng. Effects of Different Planting Densities on Main Agronomic Traits and Yield of Peanuts [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2637-2643. |
[4] | MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, SHI Bixian, DING Hong, LI Limin, ZHANG Zhimeng. Effects of Drought at Different Growth Stages on Growth and Yield of Peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(3): 441-449. |
[5] | MIAO Haocui, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GUO Feng, ZHANG Jialei, LI Qiang, LI Limin. Effects of Different Fruit Tree Intercropping on Growth Dynamics and Yield of Peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9): 1630-1638. |
[6] | ZHANG Xin-wei, CHEN Yi-fei , YANG Hui-min, MA Yan, WANG Xue-nong. Research status of plant physiological and ecological information monitoring technology [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(9): 1743-1755. |
[7] | YU Bo-cheng, XIAO Ying, CHEN Jiang-qing, SONG Zheng-hai, WANG Qiao-jiang, SONG Xin-tang, ZHANG Zhi-meng. Effects of Different Calcium Applications on Some Economic Characters and Yield of Peanuts [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(12): 2242-2250. |
[8] | SHI Bi-xian;ZHU Ming-cheng;WAGN Qi-cai;GU Yuan-guo;YU Bo-cheng;CHEN Yue-hua;LI Qiang. Present Situation, Existing Problems and Development Strageties of Peanut Production in Xinjiang [J]. , 2017, 54(3): 574-584. |
[9] | YU BO-cheng;XIAO Ying;CHEN Jiang-qing;ZHANG Zhi-meng. Effect Analysis of Traits of Peanuts Planted in Different Spans from Walnut Trunks [J]. , 2017, 54(3): 423-428. |
[10] | LIU Xin-ting, WANG Juan, HOU Xian-fei, CHEN Yue-hua, LAN Hai-yan, LI Qiang. Effect of Drip Irrigation and Fertilizer Coupling on Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Dry Matter Accumulation and Its Yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(11): 2013-2021. |
[11] | CUI Hong-liang;MIAO Hao-cui;LI Li-min;ZHANG jian-cheng;WU zheng-feng;GAO ying. Agronomic Traits Analysis of Introduced Peanut Varieties in Xinjiang [J]. , 2016, 53(12): 2242-2249. |
[12] | LI Qiang;GU Yuan-guo;WANG Juan;JIA Dong-hai;ZHANG Le;CHEN Yue-hua. Effects of Different Density on Photosynthetic Physiology and Yield of Peanut in Arid Regions of Xinjiang [J]. , 2016, 53(1): 84-90. |
[13] | YU BO-cheng;LIU Heng-de;ZHANG Zhi-meng;LI Rong-lian;XIAO-ying. Analysis of Biological Traits and Yield of Peanut Affected by Different Hilling Methods Interplanted with Fruit Trees [J]. , 2015, 52(6): 1007-1013. |
[14] | FU XIAO;ZHU Ling-xiao;LIU Meng-juan;DING Hong;CI Dun-wei;ZHANG Zhi-meng;SHI Shu-bing. Effects of Irrigation on the Growth, Development and Yield of Peanut at Different Growth Stages [J]. , 2015, 52(12): 2187-2193. |
[15] | YU BO-cheng;LIU Heng-de;ZHANG Zhi-meng;LI Rong-lian;XIAO-ying;ZHANG Li. Analysis of Biological Traits and Yield of Peanut Affected by Different Hilling Methods Interplanted with Fruit Trees [J]. , 2014, 51(7): 1197-1204. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||