新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 140-149.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.016
肖中林(), 闫会转(), 高杰, 王思逸, 张旭旭, 艾力西热·尼加提
收稿日期:
2022-05-15
出版日期:
2023-01-20
发布日期:
2023-03-07
通信作者:
闫会转(1985-),女,河南人,副教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜分子育种,(E-mail)hzhyan1118@163.com
作者简介:
肖中林(1997-),男,四川巴中人,硕士研究生,研究方向为蔬菜栽培与生理,(E-mail)8027523@qq.com
基金资助:
XIAO Zhonglin(), YAN Huizhuan(), GAO Jie, WANG Siyi, ZHANG Xuxu, Ailixire Nijiati
Received:
2022-05-15
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2023-03-07
Correspondence author:
YAN Huizhuan (1985-), female, native place: Henan, Doctor, lecturer,research field: vegetable molecular breeding, (E-mail)hzhyan1118@163.com
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究不同浓度NaCl和NaHCO3溶液对2种制干辣椒品种红椒王和川椒19号光合特性的影响。【方法】以红椒王和川椒19号为试材,以NaCl和NaHCO3溶液浓度为变量,采用盆栽定量浇灌,测定现蕾时辣椒叶片的净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度和胞间 CO2浓度,利用相关性分析、线性回归分析2种制干辣椒品种光合特性日变化规律。【结果】在栽培基质中分别浇灌50、100、150和200 mmol/L NaCl和NaHCO3溶液后,辣椒叶片受到了NaCl和NaHCO3胁迫而出现了净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度和胞间CO2浓度降低的变化现象。在200 mmol/L NaCl处理下红椒王日平均净光合速率最低为13.79 μmol/(m2·s),川椒19号在200 mmol/L NaHCO3处理下日平均净光合速率最低为16.85 μmol/(m2·s)。【结论】NaCl和NaHCO3胁迫对红椒王和川椒19号2种制干辣椒品种的光合特性产生了抑制影响。
中图分类号:
肖中林, 闫会转, 高杰, 王思逸, 张旭旭, 艾力西热·尼加提. 不同浓度NaCl和NaHCO3胁迫对制干辣椒光合特性日变化的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 140-149.
XIAO Zhonglin, YAN Huizhuan, GAO Jie, WANG Siyi, ZHANG Xuxu, Ailixire Nijiati. Effects of Different Concentrations of NaCl and NaHCO3 Stress on Diurnal Changes of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Dried Pepper[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 140-149.
项目 Item | Ca(NO3)2·4H2O (mg/L) | KNO3 (mg/L) | NH4H2PO4 (mg/L) | MgSO4·7H2O (mg/L) | NaCl (mmol/L) | NaHCO3 (mmol/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
CK2 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
T1 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 |
T2 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
T3 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 150.00 | 0.00 |
T4 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 200.00 | 0.00 |
R1 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 |
R2 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
R3 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 150.00 |
R4 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 200.00 |
表1 不同浓度浇灌溶液处理设置
Table 1 Treatment settings of different concentrations of watering solution
项目 Item | Ca(NO3)2·4H2O (mg/L) | KNO3 (mg/L) | NH4H2PO4 (mg/L) | MgSO4·7H2O (mg/L) | NaCl (mmol/L) | NaHCO3 (mmol/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
CK2 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
T1 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 |
T2 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
T3 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 150.00 | 0.00 |
T4 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 200.00 | 0.00 |
R1 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 |
R2 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
R3 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 150.00 |
R4 | 945.00 | 809.00 | 153.00 | 493.00 | 0.00 | 200.00 |
图1 叶片光合特性Pn日变化曲线 注:A:NaCl胁迫红椒王Pn日变化曲线;B:NaHCO3胁迫红椒王Pn日变化曲线;C:NaCl胁迫川椒19号Pn日变化曲线;D:NaHCO3胁迫川椒19号Pn日变化曲线
Fig.1 Diurnal variation of net photosynthetic rate(Pn) Note: A: demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Pn of Hongjiao Wang under NaCl stress; B: demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Pn under NaHCO3 stress.C: demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Pn of Chuanjiao 19 under NaCl stress; D: demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Pn under NaHCO3 stress
图2 叶片蒸腾速率Tr日变化曲线 注:A:NaCl胁迫红椒王Tr日变化曲线;B:NaHCO3胁迫红椒王Tr日变化曲线;C:NaCl胁迫川椒19号Tr日变化曲线;D:NaHCO3胁迫川椒19号Tr日变化曲线
Fig.2 Diurnal variation of transpiration rate Tr Note: A:demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Tr of Hongjiao Wang under NaCl stress; B: demonstrates the diurnal Tr variation curve of Hongjiao Wang under NaHCO3 stress.C: demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Tr of Chuanjiao 19 under NaCl stress; D: demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Tr of Chuanjiao 19 under NaHCO3 stress
图3 叶片气孔导度Gs日变化曲线 注:A:NaCl胁迫红椒王Gs日变化曲线;B:NaHCO3胁迫红椒王日变化曲线;C:NaCl胁迫川椒19号Gs日变化曲线;D:NaHCO3胁迫川椒19号Gs日变化曲线。
Fig.3 Diurnal variation of stomatal conductance Gs Note: A: demonstrates the diurnal variation curve of Gs of Hongjiao Wang under NaCl stress;B: demonstrates the diurnal Gs variation curve of Hongjiao Wang under NaHCO3 stress.C: demonstrates the diurnal Gs variation curve of Chuanjiao 19 under NaCl stress; D: demonstrates the daily Gs variation curve of Chuanjiao 19 under NaHCO3 stress.
图4 叶片胞间CO2浓度Ci日变化曲线 注:A:NaCl胁迫红椒王Ci日变化曲线;B:NaHCO3胁迫红椒王Ci日变化曲线;C:NaCl胁迫川椒19号Ci日变化曲线;D:NaHCO3胁迫川椒19号Ci日变化曲线
Fig.4 Diurnal variation of intercellular CO2 concentration Ci Note: A: demonstrates the diurnal Ci variation curve of Hongjiao Wang under NaCl stress; FIG.B demonstrates the diurnal Ci variation curve of Hongjiao Wang under NaHCO3 stress.C: demonstrates the diurnal Ci curve of Chuanjiao 19 under NaCl stress; D: demonstrates the diurnal Ci variation curve of Chuanjiao 19 under NaHCO3 stress
处理 Treatment | 皮尔逊相关系数 Pearson correlation coefficient | 净光合速率 Pn | 蒸腾速率 Tr | 气孔导度 Gs | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
红椒王NaCl Hongjiao Wang NaCl stres | 相关性 | -0.563** | -0.581** | -0.666** | -0.536** |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
红椒王NaHCO3 Hongjiao Wang NaHCO3 stress | 相关性 | -0.575** | -0.653** | -0.762** | -0.712** |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
川椒19号NaCl Chuanjiao 19 NaCl stress | 相关性 | -0.327 | -0.599** | -0.612** | -0.527** |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.078 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
川椒19号NaHCO3 Chuanjiao 19 NaHCO3 stress | 相关性 | -0.399* | -0.298 | -0.168 | -0.401* |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.029 | 0.109 | 0.375 | 0.028 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
表2 不同浓度NaCl和NaHCO3胁迫制干辣椒与各光合特性参数相关性
Tab.2 Correlation analysis between different concentrations of NaCl and NaHCO3 stress and photosynthetic characteristics parameters of dried pepper
处理 Treatment | 皮尔逊相关系数 Pearson correlation coefficient | 净光合速率 Pn | 蒸腾速率 Tr | 气孔导度 Gs | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
红椒王NaCl Hongjiao Wang NaCl stres | 相关性 | -0.563** | -0.581** | -0.666** | -0.536** |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
红椒王NaHCO3 Hongjiao Wang NaHCO3 stress | 相关性 | -0.575** | -0.653** | -0.762** | -0.712** |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
川椒19号NaCl Chuanjiao 19 NaCl stress | 相关性 | -0.327 | -0.599** | -0.612** | -0.527** |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.078 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
川椒19号NaHCO3 Chuanjiao 19 NaHCO3 stress | 相关性 | -0.399* | -0.298 | -0.168 | -0.401* |
Sig.(双尾) | 0.029 | 0.109 | 0.375 | 0.028 | |
个案数 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
图5 不同浓度NaCl和NaHCO3胁迫胁迫下制干辣椒日平均净光合速率变化 注:A:NaCl胁迫红椒王回归方程;B:NaHCO3胁迫红椒王回归方程;C:NaCl胁迫川椒19号回归方程;D:NaHCO3胁迫川椒19号回归方程
Fig.5 Effects of different concentrations of NaCl and NaHCO3 stress on the average daily net photosynthetic rate of dried pepper Note: A: demonstrates the regression equation of Hongjiao Wang under NaCl stress; FIG.B demonstrates the regression equation of Hongjiao Wang under NaHCO3 stress.C: demonstrates the regression equation of Chuanjiao 19 under NaCl stress; D: demonstrates the regression equation of Chuanjiao 19 under NaHCO3 stress
[1] | 高翔. 辣椒的保健功能及其产品的开发研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2004, 5 (3) : 115-116. |
GAO Xiang. Research on health function of pepper and development of its products[J]. Food Research and Development, 2004, 5(3): 115-116. | |
[2] | 聂楚楚, 王秀峰, 毛芙蓉, 等. 辣椒品种的聚类及主成分分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(17) : 86-91. |
NIE Chuchu, WANG Xiufeng, MAO Furong, et al. Cluster analysis and principal component analysis of pepper varieties[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(17): 86-91. | |
[3] | 李萌, 龙彭年, 肖四海. 世界辣椒产业经济发展状况与我国的对策思考[J]. 辣椒杂志, 2010, 8(4): 1 - 5. |
LI Meng, LONG Pengnian, XIAO Sihai. Economic development of chili industry in the world and countermeasures in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Chili, 2010, 8(4): 1-5. | |
[4] |
魏守才, 谢文军, 夏江宝, 等. 盐渍化条件下土壤团聚体及其有机碳研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1) : 369-376.
DOI |
WEI Shoucai, XIE Wenjun, XIA Jiangbao, et al. Research progress of soil aggregate and its organic carbon under salinization[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1): 369-376.
DOI |
|
[5] | Mao H T, Huang Q H, Wu H B. Soil salinization features in arid areas farmland[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering Science, 2016, 32(S1): 112-117. |
[6] | 闵首军, 崔松山, 陈沁利. 土壤盐渍化及其治理措施研究综述[J]. 中国农业信息, 2016,(5): 108,110. |
MIN Shoujun, CUI Songshan, CHEN Qinli. Review on soil salinization and its control measures[J]. China Agricultural Information, 2016,(5): 108,110. | |
[7] | 祁石刚, 高学双, 赵宇航, 等. 土壤改良剂对蔬菜作物产质量及设施土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020,(22): 46-49. |
QI Shigang, GAO Xueshuang, ZHAO Yuhang, et al. Effects of soil modifiers on yield and quality of vegetable crops and physical and chemical properties of protected soil[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020,(22): 46-49. | |
[8] | 吉雪花, 钱渝. 三种盐胁迫对线辣椒生理特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(20): 1-6. |
JI Xuehua, QIAN Yu. Effects of salt stress on physiological characteristics of Pepper[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(20): 1-6. | |
[9] | 李汉钊, 吉雪花, 郭鹏博, 等. 持续盐胁迫对制干辣椒光合作用的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016,(9): 1-5. |
LI Hanzhao, JI Xuehua, GUO Pengbo, et al. Effects of continuous salt stress on photosynthesis of dried pepper[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(9): 1-5. | |
[10] |
张玲, 王华, 周静, 等. NaCl胁迫对两个辣椒品种幼苗叶绿素荧光参数等生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(4): 597-601.
DOI |
ZHANG Ling, WANG Hua, ZHOU Jing, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and other physiological characteristics of two pepper cultivars seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(4): 597-601.
DOI |
|
[11] | 王伟奇, 张蒙, 秦肇辰, 等. 南瓜耐盐性研究进展[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2020,(10): 18-26. |
WANG Weiqi, ZHANG Meng, QIN Zhaochen, et al. Research progress on salt tolerance of pumpkin[J]. China Vegetables, 2020,(10): 18-26. | |
[12] | 李然红, 金志民, 宗宪春, 等. NaCl单盐胁迫对大白菜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2015,(12): 31-34. |
LI Ranhong, JIN Zhimin, ZONG Xianchun, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Chinese cabbage[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015,(12): 31-34. | |
[13] | 闻小霞, 王冬, 周爱凤, 等. 盐胁迫对不同菠菜品种发芽率及生理特性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(3): 27-30. |
Wen Xiaoxia, WANG Dong, ZHOU Aifeng, et al. Effects of salt stress on germination rate and physiological characteristics of different spinach varieties[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 48(3): 27-30. | |
[14] | 徐进, 赵鹤, 任爽, 等. 盐胁迫对番茄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 蔬菜, 2020,(8): 20-23. |
XU Jin, ZHAO He, REN Shuang, et al. Effects of salt stress on growth and fruit quality of tomato[J]. Vegetables, 2020,(8): 20-23. | |
[15] | 柳国强, 谢爱方, 林多, 等. 盐胁迫对叶用莴苣生长与品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016,(21): 20-23. |
LIU Guoqiang, XIE Aifang, LIN Duo, et al. Effects of salt stress on growth and quality of leaf lettuce[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(21): 20-23. | |
[16] | 宿海霞, 杨丽娟, 郭莹靖, 等. 钙对盐胁迫下豇豆萌发与幼苗生长影响试验初报[J]. 南方农业, 2019, 13(14): 122 - 123,126. |
SU Haixia, YANG Lijuan, GUO Yingjing, et al. Effects of calcium on germination and seedling growth of cowpea under salt stress[J]. Southern Agriculture, 2019, 13(14): 122-123,126. | |
[17] |
马兴东, 郭晔红, 杜弢, 等. 施氮对干旱区两种枸杞光合日变化和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 173 - 182.
DOI |
MA Xingdong, GUO Yehong, DU Tao, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on diurnal variation of photosynthesis and yield of two Lycium barbarum species in arid area[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 173-182. | |
[18] | 韩多红, 周德峰, 孟好军. 干旱荒漠区早酥和红早酥梨夏季光合作用日变化规律研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(4): 120 - 123. |
HAN Duohong, ZHOU Defeng, MENG Haojun. Study on diurnal variation of photosynthesis of Zaosu and Hongzaosu pears in arid desert region in summer[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(4): 120-123. | |
[19] |
程云霞, 刘迁杰, 贾凯, 等. 不同剂量保水剂对袋式复合沙培辣椒光合特性日变化规律的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(10): 1821 - 1829.
DOI |
CHENG Yunxia, LIU Qianjie, JIA Kai, et al. Effects of different dose of water retaining agent on diurnal variation of photosynthetic characteristics of pepper in bag combined sand culture[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(10): 1821-1829.
DOI |
|
[20] | 霍振荣, 庞金安, 杜胜利. 辣椒光合特性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 1998,(3): 122 - 125. |
HUO Zhenrong, PANG Jinan, DU Shengli. Study on photosynthetic characteristics of pepper[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 1998,(3): 122-125. | |
[21] | 牛彩霞. 盐胁迫对辣椒种子萌发和幼苗生理特性的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2006. |
NIU Caixia. Effects of salt stress on seed germination and seedling physiological characteristics of pepper[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2006. | |
[22] | 张海英. 盐胁迫和碱胁迫对制干辣椒生长发育及果实品质的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. |
ZHANG Haiying. Effects of salt and alkali stress on growth and fruit quality of dried pepper[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. |
[1] | 肖乐乐, 李志强, 冶军, 蒲敏, 阮向阳, 刘怀金. 肽肥与镁配施对森田尼无核葡萄品质和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1904-1912. |
[2] | 马新超, 轩正英, 闵昊哲, 齐志文, 成宏宇, 谭占明, 王旭峰. 水氮耦合对沙培黄瓜光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1966-1974. |
[3] | 肖菁, 刘宁, 许明海, 张金波, 马艳明, 王莉, 徐麟. NaCl胁迫对糜子种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1623-1629. |
[4] | 杨晓娟, 靳娟, 樊丁宇, 郝庆, 杨磊, 耿文娟. 极端高温环境对骏枣和伏脆蜜枣光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1679-1688. |
[5] | 田文强, 郭飞, 聂凌帆, 孙刚刚, 王泓懿, 史永清, 尚艳明, 吴利, 石书兵, 张金汕. 超晚播对冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1059-1066. |
[6] | 陈丽靓, 鲁倩君, 马媛媛, 刘迎, 赵宝龙, 孙军利. 不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 880-888. |
[7] | 朱普生, 刘慧英, 曹泽, 刘凯歌, 李雪珍. 外源GSNO对NaCl胁迫下番茄幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 351-358. |
[8] | 秦国礼, 王为然, 王萌, 杨静, 黄幸磊, 刘志清, 朱家辉, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 孔杰, 陈国栋. 草甘膦对海岛棉农艺性状及光合作用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2861-2868. |
[9] | 姚庆, 施俊杰, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 顾元国, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 苗昊翠, 李强. 42份匍匐型花生幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2442-2452. |
[10] | 马媛媛, 李刚, 何旺, 赵宝龙, 鲁倩君, 陈丽靓, 刘迎. 外源褪黑素对NaCl胁迫下草莓幼苗生理特性的缓解效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2486-2495. |
[11] | 张雁飞, 靳娟, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 贾平平, 杨磊, 樊丁宇, 周龙, 郝庆. 赛蜜酥1号枣及其芽变的表型和光合差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 69-78. |
[12] | 韩毅, 赵宝龙, 孙军利, 赵书成. 新疆桃实生优选单株叶片性状及光合特性日变化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2170-2178. |
[13] | 牛倩, 张雯, 韩守安, 王敏, 王文勇, 冯福基, 王环, 弓佳琪, 李佳颖, 田嘉, 谢辉. 高温胁迫对无核白鸡心和无核翠宝葡萄叶片光合及荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1919-1928. |
[14] | 钟信念, 梁其干, 李有忠, 赵建华, 马海霞, 李志博. 蕾期低温胁迫对棉花光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1573-1581. |
[15] | 陈丽靓, 孙军利, 常心怡, 叶家发. 外源ALA对NaCl胁迫下酸枣幼苗叶绿素合成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1659-1665. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||