新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 597-608.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.03.009
马新超1,2,3(), 周宇1,2, 刘青1, 轩正英1,2,3(), 陈蒙蒙1, 张凯浩1, 王旭峰3, 谭占明1
收稿日期:
2021-06-15
出版日期:
2022-03-20
发布日期:
2022-03-28
通信作者:
轩正英
作者简介:
马新超(1998-),男,河南南阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为设施农业,(E-mail) mxczky@163.com
基金资助:
MA Xinchao1,2,3(), ZHOU Yu1,2, LIU Qing1, XUAN Zhengying1,2,3(), CHEN Mengmeng1, ZHANG Kaihao1, WANG Xufeng3, TAN Zhanming1
Received:
2021-06-15
Online:
2022-03-20
Published:
2022-03-28
Correspondence author:
XUAN Zhengying
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究不同水肥耦合处理对黄瓜光合荧光特性、产量及品质的影响。【方法】以新泰密刺黄瓜为试材,在黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培模式下,设置不同的灌水量、氮肥、磷肥和钾肥共4个变量,采用四元二次通用旋转组合设计的1/2。【结果】(1)黄瓜净光合速率随着灌溉量的增加而增加;水分较少的情况下,适当的肥料供应可以提高黄瓜光合能力。(2)105%Ep水分和氮肥供给下,较低的磷钾肥有助于黄瓜叶绿素的合成。90%Ep水分供给下,黄瓜植株叶片的叶绿体色素含量处在较高的水平,最大光转化效率值Fv/Fm最大。(3)75%Ep的水分供给下,较高的氮肥和钾肥,再施以较低的磷肥有助于提高黄瓜的单果重,适当减少灌水量有助于提高黄瓜产量和品质。【结论】在黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培模式下,适用于设施黄瓜生产的最优水肥配比是处理C16,即90%Ep和N 540 kg/hm2+P2O5 270 kg/hm2+K2O 1 043 kg/hm2。
中图分类号:
马新超, 周宇, 刘青, 轩正英, 陈蒙蒙, 张凯浩, 王旭峰, 谭占明. 水肥耦合对黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培黄瓜光合荧光特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 597-608.
MA Xinchao, ZHOU Yu, LIU Qing, XUAN Zhengying, CHEN Mengmeng, ZHANG Kaihao, WANG Xufeng, TAN Zhanming. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Cucumber Cultivated with Yellow Sand and Slag Composite Substrate[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(3): 597-608.
因素 Factor | 变化间距 Varying spacing | 水平及编码 Level and code | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1.682 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1.682 | ||
灌水量Ep Irrigation volume (%) | 15 | 65 | 75 | 90 | 105 | 115 |
N (kg/hm2) | 150 | 288 | 390 | 540 | 690 | 792 |
P (kg/hm2) | 60 | 169 | 210 | 270 | 330 | 371 |
K (kg/hm2) | 180 | 427 | 550 | 730 | 920 | 1 043 |
表1 试验因素水平及编码
Table 1 Level and Code of Test Factors
因素 Factor | 变化间距 Varying spacing | 水平及编码 Level and code | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1.682 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1.682 | ||
灌水量Ep Irrigation volume (%) | 15 | 65 | 75 | 90 | 105 | 115 |
N (kg/hm2) | 150 | 288 | 390 | 540 | 690 | 792 |
P (kg/hm2) | 60 | 169 | 210 | 270 | 330 | 371 |
K (kg/hm2) | 180 | 427 | 550 | 730 | 920 | 1 043 |
处理 Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume | N | P | K | 处理 Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume | N | P | K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 12 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 |
4 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 |
5 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 |
6 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 |
7 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
表2 试验设计
Table 2 Test Scheme Design
处理 Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume | N | P | K | 处理 Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume | N | P | K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 12 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 |
4 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 |
5 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 |
6 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 |
7 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Photo(Pn) (μmol/(m2·s)) | 气孔导度 Cond(Gs) (mol/(m2·s)) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) (μmol/mol) | 蒸腾速率 Trmmol(Tr) (mmol/(m2·s)) | 水分利用率 Water use efficiency (WUE) (mmol/mol) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 9.86±0.09efg | 0.15±0.01bc | 246.28±5.43a | 3.71±0.20bc | 2.66±0.12gh |
C2 | 10.71±0.72cde | 0.17±0.05ab | 243.21±21.97a | 4.08±0.81b | 2.68±0.35efgh |
C3 | 9.40±1.83g | 0.16±0.08bc | 240.02±31.80a | 3.77±1.46bc | 2.67±0.55fgh |
C4 | 10.78±0.71cd | 0.14±0.01cde | 221.78±19.10bcd | 3.76±0.15bc | 2.88±0.31defgh |
C5 | 7.82±0.37ij | 0.09±0.01fgh | 220.30±9.71bcd | 2.83±0.29fg | 2.77±0.15efgh |
C6 | 9.78±0.21fg | 0.13±0.03cde | 230.38±23.14abc | 3.66±0.58bcd | 2.74±0.49efgh |
C7 | 11.19±0.64bc | 0.12±0.02def | 207.20±31.32de | 3.46±0.44cd | 3.30±0.60a |
C8 | 13.04±0.09a | 0.19±0.00a | 236.86±4.45ab | 4.93±0.02a | 2.64±0.03gh |
C9 | 7.43±0.12jk | 0.07±0.00h | 182.98±3.68f | 2.21±0.03h | 3.36±0.09a |
C10 | 6.84±0.84k | 0.08±0.01h | 219.66±4.70cd | 2.62±0.19fgh | 2.60±0.13h |
C11 | 9.18±0.29gh | 0.11±0.01efg | 211.70±14.11de | 3.46±0.18cd | 2.66±0.23gh |
C12 | 8.36±0.07hi | 0.09±0.00fgh | 195.40±4.92ef | 2.89±0.06efg | 2.89±0.08defgh |
C13 | 9.39±0.31g | 0.09±0.01fgh | 184.71±6.10f | 2.82±0.19fg | 3.34±0.12a |
C14 | 7.99±1.70ij | 0.08±0.02gh | 196.21±8.49ef | 2.50±0.61gh | 3.21±0.12abc |
C15 | 10.04±0.05defg | 0.11±0.01def | 205.21±11.24de | 3.13±0.22def | 3.22±0.21ab |
C16 | 11.74±0.33b | 0.16±0.01bc | 221.32±0.19bcd | 3.95±0.11bc | 2.97±0.00bcde |
C17 | 10.61±0.98cdef | 0.15±0.03bc | 229.65±10.66abc | 3.59±0.47bcd | 2.97±0.12bcdef |
C18 | 10.60±0.32cdef | 0.15±0.01bc | 234.43±2.23abc | 3.63±0.16bcd | 2.92±0.05cdefg |
C19 | 10.61±0.98cdef | 0.15±0.03bc | 229.65±10.66abc | 3.59±0.47bcd | 2.97±0.12bcdef |
C20 | 10.55±0.76cdef | 0.14±0.03cd | 220.89±15.74bcd | 3.40±0.50cde | 3.13±0.23abcd |
表3 不同水肥耦合处理下黄瓜光合作用变化
Table 6 Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Coupling Treatments on Cucumber Photosynthesis
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Photo(Pn) (μmol/(m2·s)) | 气孔导度 Cond(Gs) (mol/(m2·s)) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) (μmol/mol) | 蒸腾速率 Trmmol(Tr) (mmol/(m2·s)) | 水分利用率 Water use efficiency (WUE) (mmol/mol) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 9.86±0.09efg | 0.15±0.01bc | 246.28±5.43a | 3.71±0.20bc | 2.66±0.12gh |
C2 | 10.71±0.72cde | 0.17±0.05ab | 243.21±21.97a | 4.08±0.81b | 2.68±0.35efgh |
C3 | 9.40±1.83g | 0.16±0.08bc | 240.02±31.80a | 3.77±1.46bc | 2.67±0.55fgh |
C4 | 10.78±0.71cd | 0.14±0.01cde | 221.78±19.10bcd | 3.76±0.15bc | 2.88±0.31defgh |
C5 | 7.82±0.37ij | 0.09±0.01fgh | 220.30±9.71bcd | 2.83±0.29fg | 2.77±0.15efgh |
C6 | 9.78±0.21fg | 0.13±0.03cde | 230.38±23.14abc | 3.66±0.58bcd | 2.74±0.49efgh |
C7 | 11.19±0.64bc | 0.12±0.02def | 207.20±31.32de | 3.46±0.44cd | 3.30±0.60a |
C8 | 13.04±0.09a | 0.19±0.00a | 236.86±4.45ab | 4.93±0.02a | 2.64±0.03gh |
C9 | 7.43±0.12jk | 0.07±0.00h | 182.98±3.68f | 2.21±0.03h | 3.36±0.09a |
C10 | 6.84±0.84k | 0.08±0.01h | 219.66±4.70cd | 2.62±0.19fgh | 2.60±0.13h |
C11 | 9.18±0.29gh | 0.11±0.01efg | 211.70±14.11de | 3.46±0.18cd | 2.66±0.23gh |
C12 | 8.36±0.07hi | 0.09±0.00fgh | 195.40±4.92ef | 2.89±0.06efg | 2.89±0.08defgh |
C13 | 9.39±0.31g | 0.09±0.01fgh | 184.71±6.10f | 2.82±0.19fg | 3.34±0.12a |
C14 | 7.99±1.70ij | 0.08±0.02gh | 196.21±8.49ef | 2.50±0.61gh | 3.21±0.12abc |
C15 | 10.04±0.05defg | 0.11±0.01def | 205.21±11.24de | 3.13±0.22def | 3.22±0.21ab |
C16 | 11.74±0.33b | 0.16±0.01bc | 221.32±0.19bcd | 3.95±0.11bc | 2.97±0.00bcde |
C17 | 10.61±0.98cdef | 0.15±0.03bc | 229.65±10.66abc | 3.59±0.47bcd | 2.97±0.12bcdef |
C18 | 10.60±0.32cdef | 0.15±0.01bc | 234.43±2.23abc | 3.63±0.16bcd | 2.92±0.05cdefg |
C19 | 10.61±0.98cdef | 0.15±0.03bc | 229.65±10.66abc | 3.59±0.47bcd | 2.97±0.12bcdef |
C20 | 10.55±0.76cdef | 0.14±0.03cd | 220.89±15.74bcd | 3.40±0.50cde | 3.13±0.23abcd |
处理 Treatment | 实际光转化效率 Actual light conversion efficiency (ΦPSⅡ) | 最大光转化效率 Maximum light conversion efficiency (Fv/Fm) | PSⅡ活性 PSⅡ activity (Fv/Fo) | 光化学淬灭系数 Photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) | 非光化学淬灭系数 Non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 0.43 ±0.01ab | 0.50 ±0.01cd | 1.00±0.06cd | 0.93±0.00ab | 0.16±0.12cde |
C2 | 0.40±0.02bcd | 0.55±0.03abc | 1.21±0.17abc | 0.85±0.02bcde | 0.34±0.14bc |
C3 | 0.38±0.01cdef | 0.52±0.06bc | 1.09±0.24bcd | 0.85±0.07bcde | 0.30±0.18bcd |
C4 | 0.39±0.02cde | 0.50±0.04bcd | 1.03±0.15cd | 0.86±0.06abcd | 0.21±0.13bcde |
C5 | 0.38±0.03cdef | 0.51±0.06bcd | 1.07±0.28bcd | 0.83±0.09cdef | 0.24±0.23bcde |
C6 | 0.44±0.01a | 0.50±0.03cd | 1.01±0.13cd | 0.90±0.06abc | 0.05±0.06e |
C7 | 0.41±0.02abc | 0.54±0.07abc | 1.19±0.30bc | 0.90±0.08abc | 0.38±0.11b |
C8 | 0.32±0.02g | 0.49±0.03cd | 0.95±0.11cd | 0.74±0.02fg | 0.24±0.03bcde |
C9 | 0.38±0.02cdef | 0.51±0.03bcd | 1.04±0.11bcd | 0.81±0.03cdefg | 0.19±0.16bcde |
C10 | 0.31±0.04g | 0.49±0.01cd | 0.96±0.02cd | 0.73±0.09g | 0.30±0.07bcd |
C11 | 0.39±0.02cdef | 0.53±0.03bc | 1.13±0.14bc | 0.81±0.05cdefg | 0.21±0.11bcde |
C12 | 0.36±0.01ef | 0.60±0.02a | 1.51±0.10a | 0.75±0.02efg | 0.64±0.05a |
C13 | 0.43±0.01ab | 0.54±0.06abc | 1.20±0.29bc | 0.84±0.02bcde | 0.14±0.20cde |
C14 | 0.40±0.01bcd | 0.57±0.02ab | 1.33±0.10ab | 0.80±0.04defg | 0.32±0.04bcd |
C15 | 0.37±0.02def | 0.55±0.05abc | 1.22±0.26abc | 0.78±0.04defg | 0.32±0.25bc |
C16 | 0.36±0.03f | 0.53±0.01bc | 1.12±0.06bcd | 0.76±0.05defg | 0.25±0.10bcde |
C17 | 0.39±0.02cdef | 0.48±0.06cd | 0.95±0.26cd | 0.86±0.12abcd | 0.10±0.03de |
C18 | 0.40±0.01bcd | 0.57±0.02ab | 1.33±0.10ab | 0.80±0.04defg | 0.32±0.04bcd |
C19 | 0.41±0.02abc | 0.54±0.07abc | 1.19±0.30bc | 0.90±0.08abc | 0.38±0.11b |
C20 | 0.39±0.01cde | 0.45±0.01d | 0.81±0.03d | 0.95±0.04a | 0.15±0.12cde |
表4 不同水肥耦合处理对黄瓜荧光特性变化
Table 4 Effect of water fertilizer coupling on fluorescence characteristics of Cucumber
处理 Treatment | 实际光转化效率 Actual light conversion efficiency (ΦPSⅡ) | 最大光转化效率 Maximum light conversion efficiency (Fv/Fm) | PSⅡ活性 PSⅡ activity (Fv/Fo) | 光化学淬灭系数 Photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) | 非光化学淬灭系数 Non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 0.43 ±0.01ab | 0.50 ±0.01cd | 1.00±0.06cd | 0.93±0.00ab | 0.16±0.12cde |
C2 | 0.40±0.02bcd | 0.55±0.03abc | 1.21±0.17abc | 0.85±0.02bcde | 0.34±0.14bc |
C3 | 0.38±0.01cdef | 0.52±0.06bc | 1.09±0.24bcd | 0.85±0.07bcde | 0.30±0.18bcd |
C4 | 0.39±0.02cde | 0.50±0.04bcd | 1.03±0.15cd | 0.86±0.06abcd | 0.21±0.13bcde |
C5 | 0.38±0.03cdef | 0.51±0.06bcd | 1.07±0.28bcd | 0.83±0.09cdef | 0.24±0.23bcde |
C6 | 0.44±0.01a | 0.50±0.03cd | 1.01±0.13cd | 0.90±0.06abc | 0.05±0.06e |
C7 | 0.41±0.02abc | 0.54±0.07abc | 1.19±0.30bc | 0.90±0.08abc | 0.38±0.11b |
C8 | 0.32±0.02g | 0.49±0.03cd | 0.95±0.11cd | 0.74±0.02fg | 0.24±0.03bcde |
C9 | 0.38±0.02cdef | 0.51±0.03bcd | 1.04±0.11bcd | 0.81±0.03cdefg | 0.19±0.16bcde |
C10 | 0.31±0.04g | 0.49±0.01cd | 0.96±0.02cd | 0.73±0.09g | 0.30±0.07bcd |
C11 | 0.39±0.02cdef | 0.53±0.03bc | 1.13±0.14bc | 0.81±0.05cdefg | 0.21±0.11bcde |
C12 | 0.36±0.01ef | 0.60±0.02a | 1.51±0.10a | 0.75±0.02efg | 0.64±0.05a |
C13 | 0.43±0.01ab | 0.54±0.06abc | 1.20±0.29bc | 0.84±0.02bcde | 0.14±0.20cde |
C14 | 0.40±0.01bcd | 0.57±0.02ab | 1.33±0.10ab | 0.80±0.04defg | 0.32±0.04bcd |
C15 | 0.37±0.02def | 0.55±0.05abc | 1.22±0.26abc | 0.78±0.04defg | 0.32±0.25bc |
C16 | 0.36±0.03f | 0.53±0.01bc | 1.12±0.06bcd | 0.76±0.05defg | 0.25±0.10bcde |
C17 | 0.39±0.02cdef | 0.48±0.06cd | 0.95±0.26cd | 0.86±0.12abcd | 0.10±0.03de |
C18 | 0.40±0.01bcd | 0.57±0.02ab | 1.33±0.10ab | 0.80±0.04defg | 0.32±0.04bcd |
C19 | 0.41±0.02abc | 0.54±0.07abc | 1.19±0.30bc | 0.90±0.08abc | 0.38±0.11b |
C20 | 0.39±0.01cde | 0.45±0.01d | 0.81±0.03d | 0.95±0.04a | 0.15±0.12cde |
处理 Treatment | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a (mg/g) | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b (mg/g) | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids (mg/g) | 叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a + b (mg/g) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a /b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 2.14±0.00p | 1.07±0.01p | 0.43±0.00m | 3.21±0.00s | 2.01±0.01b |
C2 | 3.65±0.04b | 2.15±0.02b | 0.62±0.01a | 5.80±0.02b | 1.69±0.03kl |
C3 | 2.81±0.00l | 1.45±0.01j | 0.50±0.01g | 4.26±0.01m | 1.95±0.01d |
C4 | 3.30±0.00g | 1.80±0.00fg | 0.57±0.01d | 5.10±0.00g | 1.83±0.00g |
C5 | 3.07±0.01i | 1.61±0.01h | 0.53±0.00e | 4.67±0.00k | 1.91±0.00f |
C6 | 3.48±0.00e | 1.96±0.00c | 0.58±0.00c | 5.44±0.01e | 1.77±0.01i |
C7 | 2.28±0.00o | 1.15±0.01o | 0.44±0.01l | 3.43±0.00r | 1.97±0.01c |
C8 | 2.59±0.01m | 1.35±0.01l | 0.48±0.00i | 3.93±0.00o | 1.92±0.01ef |
C9 | 2.51±0.01n | 1.30±0.01m | 0.47±0.01j | 3.82±0.00p | 1.93±0.01def |
C10 | 2.86±0.01k | 1.47±0.00i | 0.51±0.01f | 4.32±0.01l | 1.94±0.01de |
C11 | 3.53±0.01d | 1.95±0.01c | 0.57±0.01d | 5.48±0.01d | 1.81±0.01h |
C12 | 2.58±0.03m | 1.18±0.02n | 0.46±0.01k | 3.76±0.02q | 2.18±0.05a |
C13 | 2.80±0.01l | 1.41±0.01k | 0.49±0.00h | 4.21±0.01n | 1.98±0.01c |
C14 | 3.61±0.01c | 2.14±0.01b | 0.58±0.00c | 5.75±0.01c | 1.68±0.01l |
C15 | 3.86±0.01a | 2.34±0.00a | 0.61±0.00b | 6.20±0.01a | 1.65±0.01m |
C16 | 3.35±0.01f | 1.83±0.01e | 0.58±0.00c | 5.19±0.00f | 1.83±0.01gh |
C17 | 3.09±0.01h | 1.80±0.01g | 0.39±0.01o | 4.89±0.00ij | 1.72±0.01j |
C18 | 3.03±0.01j | 1.85±0.01d | 0.37±0.00p | 4.88±0.00j | 1.64±0.01m |
C19 | 3.07±0.01i | 1.85±0.00d | 0.37±0.00p | 4.91±0.01h | 1.66±0.01m |
C20 | 3.09±0.00h | 1.81±0.00f | 0.40±0.00n | 4.90±0.00i | 1.71±0.00jk |
表5 不同水肥耦合处理下黄瓜叶片叶绿体色素含量变化
Table 5 Effect of water fertilizer coupling on chloroplast pigment content of Cucumber Leaves
处理 Treatment | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a (mg/g) | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b (mg/g) | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids (mg/g) | 叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a + b (mg/g) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a /b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 2.14±0.00p | 1.07±0.01p | 0.43±0.00m | 3.21±0.00s | 2.01±0.01b |
C2 | 3.65±0.04b | 2.15±0.02b | 0.62±0.01a | 5.80±0.02b | 1.69±0.03kl |
C3 | 2.81±0.00l | 1.45±0.01j | 0.50±0.01g | 4.26±0.01m | 1.95±0.01d |
C4 | 3.30±0.00g | 1.80±0.00fg | 0.57±0.01d | 5.10±0.00g | 1.83±0.00g |
C5 | 3.07±0.01i | 1.61±0.01h | 0.53±0.00e | 4.67±0.00k | 1.91±0.00f |
C6 | 3.48±0.00e | 1.96±0.00c | 0.58±0.00c | 5.44±0.01e | 1.77±0.01i |
C7 | 2.28±0.00o | 1.15±0.01o | 0.44±0.01l | 3.43±0.00r | 1.97±0.01c |
C8 | 2.59±0.01m | 1.35±0.01l | 0.48±0.00i | 3.93±0.00o | 1.92±0.01ef |
C9 | 2.51±0.01n | 1.30±0.01m | 0.47±0.01j | 3.82±0.00p | 1.93±0.01def |
C10 | 2.86±0.01k | 1.47±0.00i | 0.51±0.01f | 4.32±0.01l | 1.94±0.01de |
C11 | 3.53±0.01d | 1.95±0.01c | 0.57±0.01d | 5.48±0.01d | 1.81±0.01h |
C12 | 2.58±0.03m | 1.18±0.02n | 0.46±0.01k | 3.76±0.02q | 2.18±0.05a |
C13 | 2.80±0.01l | 1.41±0.01k | 0.49±0.00h | 4.21±0.01n | 1.98±0.01c |
C14 | 3.61±0.01c | 2.14±0.01b | 0.58±0.00c | 5.75±0.01c | 1.68±0.01l |
C15 | 3.86±0.01a | 2.34±0.00a | 0.61±0.00b | 6.20±0.01a | 1.65±0.01m |
C16 | 3.35±0.01f | 1.83±0.01e | 0.58±0.00c | 5.19±0.00f | 1.83±0.01gh |
C17 | 3.09±0.01h | 1.80±0.01g | 0.39±0.01o | 4.89±0.00ij | 1.72±0.01j |
C18 | 3.03±0.01j | 1.85±0.01d | 0.37±0.00p | 4.88±0.00j | 1.64±0.01m |
C19 | 3.07±0.01i | 1.85±0.00d | 0.37±0.00p | 4.91±0.01h | 1.66±0.01m |
C20 | 3.09±0.00h | 1.81±0.00f | 0.40±0.00n | 4.90±0.00i | 1.71±0.00jk |
处理 Treatment | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids (%) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar(%) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mg/g) | VC Vitamin C (mg/100g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 4.50±0.17abcde | 2.90±0.06h | 0.63±0.04h | 1.81±0.08e |
C2 | 4.83±0.93abcd | 4.21±0.31abcd | 0.87±0.05bcde | 2.14±0.08c |
C3 | 5.23±1.89ab | 4.62±0.30ab | 0.95±0.03ab | 1.64±0.08f |
C4 | 4.93±0.45abc | 3.09±0.30gh | 0.79±0.03ef | 1.14±0.08g |
C5 | 3.97±0.12de | 3.75±0.33defg | 0.76±0.06fg | 0.97±0.08h |
C6 | 3.83±0.12e | 3.10±0.38gh | 0.68±0.05gh | 0.81±0.08i |
C7 | 4.07±0.21cde | 3.76±0.42defg | 0.65±0.05h | 1.14±0.08g |
C8 | 3.77±0.23e | 3.76±0.30defg | 0.76±0.03fg | 3.15±0.08a |
C9 | 5.37±0.65a | 3.96±0.41bcde | 0.98±0.05a | 2.31±0.08b |
C10 | 5.33±0.40ab | 3.19±0.48fgh | 0.81±0.04ef | 1.14±0.08g |
C11 | 4.13±0.15cde | 3.86±0.35cdef | 0.91±0.07abcd | 0.97±0.08h |
C12 | 5.40±0.50a | 2.99±0.44h | 0.76±0.04fg | 0.97±0.08h |
C13 | 3.87±0.06e | 3.47±0.56efgh | 0.93±0.03abc | 1.14±0.08g |
C14 | 4.83±0.12abcd | 4.51±0.60abc | 0.82±0.04def | 1.81±0.08e |
C15 | 4.50±0.17abcde | 3.74±0.42defg | 0.85±0.04cde | 1.98±0.08d |
C16 | 5.17±0.46ab | 4.73±0.45a | 0.96±0.04a | 1.98±0.08d |
C17 | 4.43±0.06bcde | 3.57±0.30defgh | 0.87±0.05bcde | 1.14±0.08g |
C18 | 4.17±0.40cde | 3.57±0.52defgh | 0.83±0.11def | 1.14±0.08g |
C19 | 4.53±0.15abcde | 3.57±0.63defgh | 0.79±0.09ef | 1.14±0.08g |
C20 | 4.17±0.46cde | 3.57±0.46defgh | 0.83±0.05def | 1.14±0.08g |
表6 不同水肥耦合处理下黄瓜品质变化
Table 6 Effect of water fertilizer coupling on cucumber quality
处理 Treatment | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids (%) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar(%) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mg/g) | VC Vitamin C (mg/100g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 4.50±0.17abcde | 2.90±0.06h | 0.63±0.04h | 1.81±0.08e |
C2 | 4.83±0.93abcd | 4.21±0.31abcd | 0.87±0.05bcde | 2.14±0.08c |
C3 | 5.23±1.89ab | 4.62±0.30ab | 0.95±0.03ab | 1.64±0.08f |
C4 | 4.93±0.45abc | 3.09±0.30gh | 0.79±0.03ef | 1.14±0.08g |
C5 | 3.97±0.12de | 3.75±0.33defg | 0.76±0.06fg | 0.97±0.08h |
C6 | 3.83±0.12e | 3.10±0.38gh | 0.68±0.05gh | 0.81±0.08i |
C7 | 4.07±0.21cde | 3.76±0.42defg | 0.65±0.05h | 1.14±0.08g |
C8 | 3.77±0.23e | 3.76±0.30defg | 0.76±0.03fg | 3.15±0.08a |
C9 | 5.37±0.65a | 3.96±0.41bcde | 0.98±0.05a | 2.31±0.08b |
C10 | 5.33±0.40ab | 3.19±0.48fgh | 0.81±0.04ef | 1.14±0.08g |
C11 | 4.13±0.15cde | 3.86±0.35cdef | 0.91±0.07abcd | 0.97±0.08h |
C12 | 5.40±0.50a | 2.99±0.44h | 0.76±0.04fg | 0.97±0.08h |
C13 | 3.87±0.06e | 3.47±0.56efgh | 0.93±0.03abc | 1.14±0.08g |
C14 | 4.83±0.12abcd | 4.51±0.60abc | 0.82±0.04def | 1.81±0.08e |
C15 | 4.50±0.17abcde | 3.74±0.42defg | 0.85±0.04cde | 1.98±0.08d |
C16 | 5.17±0.46ab | 4.73±0.45a | 0.96±0.04a | 1.98±0.08d |
C17 | 4.43±0.06bcde | 3.57±0.30defgh | 0.87±0.05bcde | 1.14±0.08g |
C18 | 4.17±0.40cde | 3.57±0.52defgh | 0.83±0.11def | 1.14±0.08g |
C19 | 4.53±0.15abcde | 3.57±0.63defgh | 0.79±0.09ef | 1.14±0.08g |
C20 | 4.17±0.46cde | 3.57±0.46defgh | 0.83±0.05def | 1.14±0.08g |
处理 Treatment | 单果重 Single fruit weight | 产量 Yield | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 维生素C Vitamin C | 综合评价值 Comprehensive evaluation value | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 0.274 | 0.000 | 0.449 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.429 | 0.196 | 19 |
C2 | 0.524 | 0.018 | 0.653 | 0.713 | 0.675 | 0.571 | 0.536 | 5 |
C3 | 0.597 | 0.405 | 0.898 | 0.938 | 0.894 | 0.357 | 0.702 | 2 |
C4 | 1.000 | 0.749 | 0.714 | 0.104 | 0.452 | 0.143 | 0.514 | 6 |
C5 | 0.275 | 0.253 | 0.122 | 0.461 | 0.374 | 0.071 | 0.257 | 17 |
C6 | 0.512 | 0.248 | 0.041 | 0.105 | 0.138 | 0.000 | 0.156 | 20 |
C7 | 0.059 | 0.557 | 0.184 | 0.469 | 0.065 | 0.143 | 0.251 | 18 |
C8 | 0.000 | 0.429 | 0.000 | 0.470 | 0.383 | 1.000 | 0.374 | 15 |
C9 | 0.256 | 0.244 | 0.980 | 0.576 | 1.000 | 0.643 | 0.650 | 3 |
C10 | 0.379 | 0.408 | 0.959 | 0.159 | 0.521 | 0.143 | 0.453 | 10 |
C11 | 0.497 | 0.704 | 0.224 | 0.524 | 0.784 | 0.071 | 0.460 | 9 |
C12 | 0.486 | 0.695 | 1.000 | 0.046 | 0.365 | 0.071 | 0.463 | 8 |
C13 | 0.404 | 0.530 | 0.061 | 0.307 | 0.855 | 0.143 | 0.372 | 16 |
C14 | 0.498 | 0.589 | 0.653 | 0.877 | 0.546 | 0.429 | 0.609 | 4 |
C15 | 0.464 | 0.567 | 0.449 | 0.458 | 0.638 | 0.500 | 0.512 | 7 |
C16 | 0.574 | 1.000 | 0.857 | 1.000 | 0.936 | 0.500 | 0.826 | 1 |
C17 | 0.372 | 0.720 | 0.408 | 0.363 | 0.675 | 0.143 | 0.450 | 11 |
C18 | 0.361 | 0.712 | 0.245 | 0.365 | 0.574 | 0.143 | 0.396 | 14 |
C19 | 0.350 | 0.704 | 0.469 | 0.365 | 0.463 | 0.143 | 0.421 | 12 |
C20 | 0.373 | 0.722 | 0.245 | 0.364 | 0.574 | 0.143 | 0.399 | 13 |
表7 不同水肥耦合处理下黄瓜产量及品质综合评价
Table 7 Comprehensive evaluation of Cucumber Yield and quality under water fertilizer coupling
处理 Treatment | 单果重 Single fruit weight | 产量 Yield | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 维生素C Vitamin C | 综合评价值 Comprehensive evaluation value | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 0.274 | 0.000 | 0.449 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.429 | 0.196 | 19 |
C2 | 0.524 | 0.018 | 0.653 | 0.713 | 0.675 | 0.571 | 0.536 | 5 |
C3 | 0.597 | 0.405 | 0.898 | 0.938 | 0.894 | 0.357 | 0.702 | 2 |
C4 | 1.000 | 0.749 | 0.714 | 0.104 | 0.452 | 0.143 | 0.514 | 6 |
C5 | 0.275 | 0.253 | 0.122 | 0.461 | 0.374 | 0.071 | 0.257 | 17 |
C6 | 0.512 | 0.248 | 0.041 | 0.105 | 0.138 | 0.000 | 0.156 | 20 |
C7 | 0.059 | 0.557 | 0.184 | 0.469 | 0.065 | 0.143 | 0.251 | 18 |
C8 | 0.000 | 0.429 | 0.000 | 0.470 | 0.383 | 1.000 | 0.374 | 15 |
C9 | 0.256 | 0.244 | 0.980 | 0.576 | 1.000 | 0.643 | 0.650 | 3 |
C10 | 0.379 | 0.408 | 0.959 | 0.159 | 0.521 | 0.143 | 0.453 | 10 |
C11 | 0.497 | 0.704 | 0.224 | 0.524 | 0.784 | 0.071 | 0.460 | 9 |
C12 | 0.486 | 0.695 | 1.000 | 0.046 | 0.365 | 0.071 | 0.463 | 8 |
C13 | 0.404 | 0.530 | 0.061 | 0.307 | 0.855 | 0.143 | 0.372 | 16 |
C14 | 0.498 | 0.589 | 0.653 | 0.877 | 0.546 | 0.429 | 0.609 | 4 |
C15 | 0.464 | 0.567 | 0.449 | 0.458 | 0.638 | 0.500 | 0.512 | 7 |
C16 | 0.574 | 1.000 | 0.857 | 1.000 | 0.936 | 0.500 | 0.826 | 1 |
C17 | 0.372 | 0.720 | 0.408 | 0.363 | 0.675 | 0.143 | 0.450 | 11 |
C18 | 0.361 | 0.712 | 0.245 | 0.365 | 0.574 | 0.143 | 0.396 | 14 |
C19 | 0.350 | 0.704 | 0.469 | 0.365 | 0.463 | 0.143 | 0.421 | 12 |
C20 | 0.373 | 0.722 | 0.245 | 0.364 | 0.574 | 0.143 | 0.399 | 13 |
[1] | 李静, 李志军, 张富仓, 等. 水氮供应对温室黄瓜叶绿素含量及光合速率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(5): 198-204. |
LI Jing, LI Zhijun, ZHANG Fuchang, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen supply on chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of greenhouse cucumber[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(5): 198-204. | |
[2] | 刘学娜. 水氮耦合对日光温室黄瓜生理特性及水氮利用效率的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2016. |
LIU Xuena. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on physiological characteristics and water-nitrogen use efficiency of cucumber in solar greenhouse[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[3] | 林琭, 汤昀, 张纪涛, 等. 不同水势对黄瓜花后叶片气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(7): 2030-2040. |
LIN Lu, TANG Yun, ZHANG Jitao, et al. Effects of different water potentials on leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cucumber during post-flowering growth stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(7): 2030-2040. | |
[4] | 耿庆玲. 西北旱区农业水土资源利用分区及其匹配特征研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2014. |
GENG Qingling. Research on Zoning of Agricultural Water and Land Resources Utilization and Their Matching Characteristics in Arid Areas of Northwest of China[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014. | |
[5] | 李银坤, 武雪萍, 吴会军, 等. 水氮条件对温室黄瓜光合日变化及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(S1): 122-129. |
LI Yinkun, WU Xueping, WU Huijun, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen conditions on the diurnal variation of photosynjournal and yield of cucumber in greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(S1): 122-129. | |
[6] | 陈永山. 氮素对温室黄瓜花后叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数影响的定量研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2007. |
CHEN Yongshan. Quantifying the effects of nitrogen on leaf photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of greenhouse cucumber after flowering[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2007. | |
[7] | 李银坤, 郭文忠, 薛绪掌, 等. 不同灌溉施肥模式对温室番茄产量、品质及水肥利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(19): 3757-3765. |
LI Yinkun, GUO Wenzhong, XUE Xuzhang, et al. Effects of different fertigation modes on tomato yield, fruit quality, and Water and Fertilizer Utilization in Greenhouse[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(19): 3757-3765. | |
[8] | 陈丽娜. 水肥耦合对温室无土栽培水果黄瓜生长发育和品质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2011. |
CHEN Lina. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on growth and quality of fruit cucumber of soilless culture in greenhouse[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2011. | |
[9] | 周宇, 陈蒙蒙, 刘青, 等. 黄沙和炉渣不同配比基质对温室黄瓜植株生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(9): 117-124. |
ZHOU Yu, CHEN Mengmeng, LIU Qing, et al. Effects of different proportions of yellow sand and slag on the growth and physiological characteristics of greenhouse cucumber plants[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 117-124. | |
[10] | 李合生, 孙群, 赵世杰, 等. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
LI Hesheng, SUN Qun, ZHAO Shijie, et al. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. | |
[11] | 高俊凤. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. |
GAO Junfeng. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. | |
[12] | 蒋静静, 屈锋, 苏春杰, 等. 不同肥水耦合对黄瓜产量品质及肥料偏生产力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(1): 86-97. |
JIANG Jingjing, QU Feng, SU Chunjie, et al. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Yield and Quality of Cucumber and Partial Factor Productivity of Fertilizer[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(1): 86-97. | |
[13] |
Richard A R. Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 80(1): 197-211.
DOI URL |
[14] | 王鹏勃. 番茄基质栽培水肥耦合效应研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2014. |
WANG Pengbo. Study on the effect of water and fertilizer coupling on tomato cultivated With subtrate in greenhouse[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2014. | |
[15] | 李建明, 潘铜华, 王玲慧, 等. 水肥耦合对番茄光合、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(10): 82-90. |
LI Jianming, PAN Tonghua, WANG Linghui, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on tomato photosynjournal, yield and water use efficiency[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(10): 82-90. | |
[16] | 付秋实, 李红岭, 崔健, 等. 水分胁迫对辣椒光合作用及相关生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(5): 1859-1866. |
FU Qiushi, LI Hongling, CUI Jian, et al. Effects of water stress on photosynjournal and associated physiological characters of Capsicum annuum L[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(5): 1859-1866. | |
[17] | 李晓, 冯伟, 曾晓春. 叶绿素荧光分析技术及应用进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006,(10): 2186-2196. |
LI Xiao, FENG Wei, ZENG Xiaochun. Advances in chlorophyll fluorescence analysis and its uses[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006,(10): 2186-2196. | |
[18] | 林兴军. 不同水肥对日光温室番茄品质和抗氧化系统及土壤环境的影响[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2011. |
LIN Xingjun. Effects of different irrigation and fertilizer levels on fruit quality and antioxidant system and soil environment of tomato in the greenhouse[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011. | |
[19] | Zhen L, Hua L, Wei P L, et al. Effects of reduced nitrogen rate on cotton yield and nitrogen use efficiency as mediated by application mode or plant density[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, (218): 150-157. |
[20] |
Verma V M, J. Foulkes A J,. Worlan D. et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for flag leaf senescence as a yield determinant in winter wheat under optimal and drought-stressed environments[J]. Euphytica, 2004, 135(3): 255-263.
DOI URL |
[21] | 李邵. 水肥耦合对温室黄瓜产量与品质形成的影响及其生理机制[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2010. |
LI Shao. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield and quality formation of greenhouse yield and quality formation of greenhouse cucumber and their physiological mechanism[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2010. | |
[22] | 王虎兵, 曹红霞, 郝舒雪, 等. 温室番茄植株养分和光合对水肥耦合的响应及其与产量关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(10): 1761-1771. |
WANG Hubing, CAO Hongxia, HAO Shuxue, et al. Responses of plant nutrient and photosynjournal in greenhouse tomato to water-fertilizer coupling and their relationship with yield[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(10): 1761-1771. | |
[23] | Badr M A, Abou-Hussein S D,. El-Tohamy W A. Tomato yield, nitrogen uptake and water use efficiency as affected by planting geometry and level of nitrogen in an arid region[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, (169): 90-97. |
[24] |
Badr M A, About-Hussein, S D, El-Tohamy, W A. et al. Nutrient uptake and yield of tomato under various methods of fertilizer application and levels of fertigation in arid lands[J]. Gesunde Pflanzen, 2010, 62(1): 11-19.
DOI URL |
[25] | Badr, M.A, El-Tohamy, W.A,. Zaghloul, A.M. Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, (110): 9-15. |
[26] | Jin L C, Shao Z K, Tai S D, et al. Quantitative response of greenhouse tomato yield and quality to water deficit at different growth stages[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, (129): 152-162. |
[27] |
Zhao B F, Shan L, Xiao M Z, et al. Conventional flooding irrigation causes an overuse of nitrogen fertilizer and low nitrogen use efficiency in intensively used solar greenhouse vegetable production[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 144(2), 11-19.
DOI URL |
[28] | Recep Çakir, Ulviye Kanburoglu-Çebi, Surreya Altintas, et al. Irrigation scheduling and water use efficiency of cucumber grown as a spring-summer cycle crop in solar greenhouse[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, (180): 78-87. |
[29] | Nangare D D, Singh, Y, Kumar, P S, et al. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by deficit irrigation regulated on phenological basis[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, (171): 73-79. |
[30] |
Zegbe J A, Behboudian M H, Clothier B E. Responses of ‘Petopride’ processing tomato to partial rootzone drying at different phenological stages[J]. Irrigation Science, 2006, 25(1): 85.
DOI URL |
[31] | 陈秀香, 马富裕, 方志刚, 等. 土壤水分含量对加工番茄产量和品质影响的研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2006,(4): 1-4. |
CHEN Xiuxiang, MA Fuyu, FANG Zhigang, et al. Preliminary study on the influence of soil moisture on yield and quality of processed tomato[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2006,(4): 1-4. | |
[32] |
夏秀波, 于贤昌, 高俊杰. 水分对有机基质栽培番茄生理特性、品质及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007,(12): 2710-2714.
PMID |
XIA Xiubo, YU Xianchang, GAO Junjie. Effects of moisture content in organic substrate on the physiological characters, fruit quality and yield of tomato plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,(12): 2710-2714.
PMID |
[1] | 陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[2] | 杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[3] | 陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[4] | 王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[5] | 王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[6] | 向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181. |
[7] | 杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[8] | 刘玉芳, 张志刚, 李长城, 李宏, 程平, 杨璐. 不同温度和成熟度对杏贮藏期腐烂率和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197. |
[9] | 巩多蕊, 杨莉玲, 韩江, 杨忠强, 刘佳, 文钰, 朱占江, 崔宽波. 模拟冷链处理下不同储藏温度对杏果实贮藏期细胞膜脂过氧化及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2198-2207. |
[10] | 李自芹, 陈雅, 李文绮, 贾文婷, 郭慧静, 宋方圆, 赵志永, 刘成江. 不同预冷方式结合H2O2处理对绿糖心冬枣贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215. |
[11] | 马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313. |
[12] | 王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[13] | 董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[14] | 李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[15] | 韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||