提高玉米抗旱鉴定准确性的水旱交替种植模式分析

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2018.05.003

新疆农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 807-812.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2018.05.003

提高玉米抗旱鉴定准确性的水旱交替种植模式分析

唐怀君^1,2,谢小清¹,张磊¹,刘成¹,孙宝成¹

1.新疆农业科学院粮食作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091;
2、中国农业大学/国家玉米改良中心,北京 100193

出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-07-25
通信作者: 孙宝成(1961-),男,甘肃人,研究员,研究方向为粮食作物抗旱性,(E-mail)thny@qq.com
作者简介:唐怀君(1983-),男,安徽人,助理研究员,研究方向为粮食作物抗旱性,(E-mail)tanghuaijun83@sina.com
基金资助:
农业部转基因重大专项“ 抗旱转基因玉米新品种公益性鉴定与评价 ”(2016ZX08003-004-006)

Study on the alternate cropping pattern of drought and Flood to improve the accuracy of drought Resistance Identification in Maize

TANG Huai-jun^1,2, XIE Xiaoqing¹, SUN Bao-cheng¹, ZHANG Lei¹, LIU-cheng¹

1、Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091;
2、National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193

Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-07-25
Correspondence author: Sun Bao-cheng (1961-), man, Gansu person, Researcher, Research direction is food crops to drought resistance, (E-mail) thny@qq.com
Supported by:
Major transgenic project of Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China "Public Welfare Appraisal and Evaluation of New Drought-Resistant Transgenic Maize Varieties" (2016ZX08003-004-006)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究玉米水旱交替种植模式鉴定法,为准确鉴定玉米抗旱性提供理论依据。【方法】以157份玉米自交系为材料,测定水旱交替种植模式法和常规水旱分区法的三重复的抗旱系数,利用三重复之间的相关系数对比研究两种方法的优劣。【结果】常规水旱分区鉴定的抗旱性,三重复间的相关系数为0.692~0.755(平均值 0.724),而水旱交替种植模式鉴定的抗旱性,三重复间的相关系数为0.835~0.887(平均值0.861);水旱交替种植模式鉴定法重复间相关系数要高出常规水旱分区鉴定法18.9%。【结论】与常规的水旱分区鉴定法相比,水旱交替种植模式抗旱鉴定法具有更高的准确性和重复性,且便于材料观察的特点,可用于玉米抗旱性大规模鉴定。

关键词: 玉米; 抗旱性; 鉴定方法; 水旱交替种植模式

Abstract: 【Objective】 To explore the method of alternate cropping pattern of flood and drought identification to provide theoretical basis for accurate identification of maize drought resistance. 【Method】 Using 157 maize inbred lines as materials, the three-repeat drought resistance coefficients of alternate cropping pattern of flood and drought method and conventional paddy-drought zoning method were tested, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods were studied by comparing the correlation coefficients between three repetitions. 【Result】 The results showed that the correlation coefficient between three repetitions was 0.692 ~ 0.755 (average 0.724) in conventional identification of flood and drought zones. The correlation coefficient between the three repeats was 0.835 ~ 0.887 (average 0.861) in alternate cropping pattern of flood and drought method. The repeated correlation coefficient of the alternate cropping pattern of flood and drought method is higher than that of the conventional rice-drought zoning method 18.9%. 【Conclusion】 Compared with the conventional method, the method of alternate cropping pattern of flood and drought identification has higher accuracy and repeatability, and is convenient for material observation, and can be used for large-scale identification of maize drought resistance.

Key words: Maize; drought resistance; Identification method; Alternate cropping pattern of flood and drought

中图分类号:

S513
S505

唐怀君, 谢小清, 张磊, 刘成, 孙宝成. 提高玉米抗旱鉴定准确性的水旱交替种植模式分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(5): 807-812.

TANG Huai-jun, XIE Xiaoqing, SUN Bao-cheng, ZHANG Lei, LIU-cheng. Study on the alternate cropping pattern of drought and Flood to improve the accuracy of drought Resistance Identification in Maize[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(5): 807-812.

参考文献 15

[1]	徐文强. 旱地全膜双垄沟播玉米品种抗旱性鉴定指标体系研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学硕士论文, 2013.XU Wen-qiang. (2013). Study on drought resistance identification parameters system of maize cultivars under completely mulched alternating narrow and wide ridges with furrow planting in rain-fed area [D]. Master Dissertation. Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou. (in Chinese)
[2]	唐怀君, 孙宝成, 谢小清, 等. 玉米抗旱性遗传特性及其简化模型的研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(6): 987-991.TANG Huai-jun, SUN Bao-cheng, XIE Xiao-qing, et al. (2016). Studies on maize genetic characteristics and a simple model of drought resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 53(6): 987-991. (in Chinese)
[3]	隆文杰, 雷涌涛, 周国雁, 等. 玉米种质资源抗旱性鉴定研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 29-34.LONG Wen-jie, LEI Yong-tao, ZHOU Guo-yan, et al. (2016). Research progress in identification of drought resistance of maize germplasm resources [J]. Act Agriculturae Jiangxi, 28(3): 29-34. (in Chinese)
[4]	王云奇, 陶洪斌, 赵丽晓, 等. 玉米对水分亏缺的响应[J]. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(2): 87-92.WANG Yun-qi, TAO Hong-bin, ZHAO Li-xiao, et al. (2014). Response of maize to water deficit [J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 22(2): 87-92.(in Chinese)
[5]	朴明鑫, 李成, 金峰学, 等. 玉米耐旱鉴定研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(4) : 89-93.PIAO Ming-xin, LI cheng, JIN Feng-xue, et al. Research development about identification of maize drought tolerance [J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 21(4): 89-93. (in Chinese)
[6]	崔纪菡, 范佳兴, 李顺国, 等. 谷子抗旱性鉴定研究进展[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2017, 48(1):89-96.CUI Ji-han, FAN Jia-xing, LI Shun-guo, et al. (2017). Research advance on evaluation of drought resistance of Setaria italic [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 48(1): 89-96. (in Chinese)
[7]	Papathanasiou, F., Dordas, C., Gekas, F., Pankou, C., Ninou, E., & Mylonas, I., et al. (2015). The use of stress tolerance indices for the selection of tolerant inbred lines and their correspondent hybrids under normal and water-stress conditions. Procedia Environmental Sciences, (29): 274-275.
[8]	唐怀君, 谢小清, 赵连佳, 等. 欠量灌水方法用于玉米抗旱性鉴定和评价研究 [J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(5): 804-810.TANG Huai-jun, XIE Xiao-qing, ZHAO Lian-jia. et al. (2017). Study on the evaluation and identification of maize drought resistance by using the method of water shortage irrigation. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 54(5): 804-810. (in Chinese)
[9]	刘化涛, 黄学芳, 黄明镜, 等. 拔节期干旱对春玉米产量性状及抗旱性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (2): 89-94.LIU Hua-tao, HUANG Xue-fang, HUANG Ming-jing, et al. (2016). Effects of drought stress at jointing stage on yield and drought resistance in spring maize [J]. Crops, (2): 89-94. (in Chinese)
[10]	韩登旭, 杨杰, 邵红雨, 等. 中国骨干玉米自交系抗旱性分析与评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(8): 1 648-1 653.HAN Deng-xu, YANG Jie, SHAO Hong-yu, et al. (2012). Analysis and evaluation of drought resistance of elite maize inbred lines in China [J]. Acta Bot Boreal Occident Sin, 32(8): 1,648-1,653. (in Chinese)
[11]	黎裕, 王天宇, 刘成, 等.玉米抗旱品种的筛选指标研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2004, (5): 210-215.LU Yu, WANG Tian-yu, LIU Cheng, et al. (2004). Analysis of criteria for screening drought tolerant maize hybrids [J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, (5): 210-215. (in Chinese)
[12]	蒲伟凤, 纪展波, 李桂兰, 等. 作物抗旱性鉴定方法研究进展 [J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2011, 25(2): 34-39.PU Wei-feng, JI Zhan-bo, LI Gui-lan, et al. (2011). Research Progresson Crop Drought-resistance Appraisal Method [J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, 25(2): 34-39. (in Chinese)
[13]	韩金龙, 王同燕, 徐子利, 等. 玉米抗旱机理及抗旱性鉴定指标研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26 (21): 142-146.HAN Jin-long, WANG Tong-yan, XU Zi-li, et al. (2010). Research Advances for Mechanism and Identification Index on Drought Resistance in Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 26 (21): 142-146. (in Chinese)
[14]	刘玉涛. 玉米抗( 耐) 旱指标鉴定方法与展望[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2013,(10): 160-163.LIU Yu-tao. (2013). Research Advances for Identification Index on Drought Resistance in Maize [J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Communication, (10): 160-163. (in Chinese)
[15]	彭云玲, 赵小强, 任续伟, 等. 开花期干旱胁迫对不同基因型玉米生理特性和产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3): 9-14.PENG Yun-ling, ZHAO Xiao-qiang, REN Xu-wei,et al. (2014). Genotypic differences in response of physiological characteristics and grain yield of maize inbred lines to drought stress at flowering stage [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 32(3): 9-14. (in Chinese)

提高玉米抗旱鉴定准确性的水旱交替种植模式分析

Study on the alternate cropping pattern of drought and Flood to improve the accuracy of drought Resistance Identification in Maize

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 15

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[2]	陈占辉, 孙强, 任姣姣, 黄博文, 许加波, 杨杰, 吴鹏昊. 玉米叶宽的QTL定位及全基因组选择分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1606-1613.
[3]	蓝陈仪航, 姚禹博, 周俊祥, 付开赟, 丁新华, 尹晓辉, 刘文, 王娜, 郭文超, 邓建宇. 亚洲玉米螟性信息素鉴定及其应用研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1614-1622.
[4]	曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371.
[5]	邵盘霞, 赵准, 邵武奎, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 李建平, 胡文冉, 黄全生. 玉米ZmCDPK22基因在干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1372-1378.
[6]	陆晏天, 桑志勤, 徐灿, 张力, 夏春兰, 王友德, 李伟, 陈树宾. 历年新疆和宁夏审定玉米品种主要性状的演化及品种审定现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1379-1388.
[7]	杨明花, 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山. 不完全双列杂交玉米组合抗倒伏综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 832-840.
[8]	周广威, 韩登旭, 朱琦, 张少民. 耐低磷新疆春玉米基因型筛选及其磷效率[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 847-856.
[9]	陈果, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 胡文冉, 赵准, 黄全生. 玉米钙依赖蛋白激酶全基因组鉴定及抗旱表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 857-864.
[10]	董秀丽, 韩登旭, 杨杰, 阿布来提·阿布拉, 戴爱梅, 李俊杰, 王业建, 刘俊, 郗浩江, 梁晓玲, 李铭东. 密植条件下玉米主要农艺性状的综合性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 865-871.
[11]	唐茜茜, 木巴热克·阿尤普, 许盼云, 于秋红, 郭春苗, 张萍, 龚鹏. 扁桃不同砧木资源根系解剖结构对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 897-907.
[12]	侯良忠, 郭同军, 张俊瑜, 苏玲玲, 古再丽努尔·艾麦提, 温小燕, 朱晓芳, 杨建中, 王文奇. 不同比例籽用西葫芦皮瓤与玉米秸秆混贮效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 567-573.
[13]	龙天宇, 邓亚辉, 祖倩丽, 杨龙, 曲延英, 陈全家. 棉花枯萎病室内苗期抗病性鉴定方法及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 416-423.
[14]	贾永红, 魏海鹏, 侯殿亮, 曾潮武, 纳斯如拉·克热木, 梁晓东. 新疆自育春小麦品种抗旱性及农艺性状相关性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2940-2948.
[15]	段燕燕, 胡静, 祁炳琴, 潘志远, 吴昊楠, 勾玲. 正反交对玉米杂交种茎秆抗倒伏性能及种植密度的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2949-2961.