水氮调配对等行距机采棉土壤、叶片水分及棉铃分布的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.001

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 1-10.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.001

• 作物遗传育种·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·种质资源 • 上一篇下一篇

水氮调配对等行距机采棉土壤、叶片水分及棉铃分布的影响

贺宏伟¹(), 张巨松¹(), 陈振¹, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木¹, 彭增莹¹, 刘群¹, 崔建平², 林涛², 郭仁松²

1.新疆农业大学农学院/教育部棉花工程研究中心,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2021-01-13 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-02-18
通信作者: 张巨松
作者简介:贺宏伟 ( 1994-),男,山西吕梁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花高产栽培,( E-mail) 1351733226@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0101605)(2017YFD0101605);自治区重点研发计划(2016B01001-2)(2016B01001-2)

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Adjustment on the Distribution of Soil, Leaf Moisture and Bolls of Cotton Harvested with Equal Row Spacing

HE Hongwei¹(), ZHANG Jusong¹(), CHEN Zhen¹, Kadiliya Abudukelimu¹, PENG Zengying¹, LIU Qun¹, CUI Jianping², LIN Tao², GUO Rensong²

1. Cotton Engineering Research Center,Ministry of Education/College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052,China
2. Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Economic Crops Research Institute, Urumqi 830091,China

Received:2021-01-13 Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-02-18
Correspondence author: ZHANG Jusong
Supported by:
National key R&D Program Project(2017YFD0101605);Key R & D Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2016B01001-2)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究适合等行距机采棉生长的最优水氮投入。【方法】以新陆中88号为供试材料,总滴灌量3 800 m³/hm²,总施氮量320 kg/hm²,设置3种灌水方式W₁、W₂、W₃,3种施肥方式N₁、N₂、N₃,分析土壤含水率、叶片含水率、棉铃时空分布、农艺性状、产量性状。【结果】W₂、N₂灌水施肥方式下,土壤含水率相对稳定,更好地给植株提供所需的营养物质。且棉花叶片保持功能的时间较长;W₂,N₂灌水施肥方式下,棉株成铃数较多,且呈筒状分布,更适宜机械采收;W₂,N₂灌水施肥方式下,植株获得的单铃重和单株结铃数均达到最高,最高产量为7 070.84 kg/hm²。【结论】W₂、N₂灌水施肥方式为最优水氮投入。

关键词: 机采棉; 土壤含水率; 叶片含水率; 棉铃时空分布; 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】 To seek the optimal water and nitrogen input suitable for the growth of cotton harvested by equal row spacing machine. 【Methods】 Under the condition of total drip irrigation volume of 3,800m³/hm² and total nitrogen application rate of 320 kg/hm², Xinluzhong 88 was taken as the test material, and 3 irrigation methods W₁, W₂, W₃, and 3 fertilization methods N₁, N₂, N₃ were set to study soil moisture content, leaf moisture content, spatiotemporal distribution of cotton bolls, agronomic traits, and yield traits, etc. 【Results】 Under W₂ and N₂ irrigation and fertilization methods, the soil moisture content was relatively stable, thus providing the plants with the better required nutrients. In addition, cotton leaves maintain their function for a longer time; under W₂, N₂ irrigation and fertilization methods, cotton plants produced more bolls and were distributed in a tube shape, which was more suitable for mechanical harvesting; under W₂, N₂ irrigation and fertilization methods, the both of the boll weight and the number per plant reached the highest at 7,070.84 kg/hm². 【Conclusion】 W₂ and N₂ irrigation and fertilization methods are the optimal water and nitrogen input.

Key words: machine-picked cotton; soil moisture content; leaf moisture content; spatiotemporal distribution of cotton bolls; yield

中图分类号:

S562

贺宏伟, 张巨松, 陈振, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木, 彭增莹, 刘群, 崔建平, 林涛, 郭仁松. 水氮调配对等行距机采棉土壤、叶片水分及棉铃分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 1-10.

HE Hongwei, ZHANG Jusong, CHEN Zhen, Kadiliya Abudukelimu, PENG Zengying, LIU Qun, CUI Jianping, LIN Tao, GUO Rensong. Effects of Water and Nitrogen Adjustment on the Distribution of Soil, Leaf Moisture and Bolls of Cotton Harvested with Equal Row Spacing[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 1-10.

图/表 8

图1 2019棉花生育期气温及降雨

Fig.1 Temperature and rainfall during the growth period of 2019 cotton

表1 灌水施肥量及时间(月/日)

Table 1 Irrigation and fertilization amount and time (M/D)

处理	基肥	6/20	7/1	7/10	7/17	7/24	7/31	8/7	8/14	8/24
Treatment	Base fertilizer	6/20	7/1	7/10	7/17	7/24	7/31	8/7	8/14	8/24
灌水量Irrigation quantity(m³/hm²)
W₁		380	380	285	285	570	570	570	570	190
W₂		380	380	427.5	427.5	570	570	427.5	427.5	190
W₃		380	380	570	570	570	570	285	285	190
施肥量Fertilizer application(kg/hm²)
N₁	64	0	32	16	16	48	48	48	48	0
N₂	64	0	32	32	32	48	48	32	32	0
N₃	64	0	32	48	48	48	48	16	16	0

图2 不同时期各处理土壤水分分布

Fig.2 The distribution of soil moisture in each treatment in different periods

图3 不同时期各处理果枝部位叶片含水率变化

Fig.3 Changes in leaf moisture content of fruit branches in different periods of each treatment

表2 不同水氮互作下机采棉农艺性状变化

Table 2 The effects of different water and nitrogen interactions on the agronomic characteristics of mechanically harvested cotton

处理 Treatment		株高 Plant height (cm)	始果枝高 Branch High envoy (cm)	倒三叶宽 Inverted three leaves wide (cm)	真叶数 True leaf number (片)	果枝数 Number Fruit branch (台)
W₁	N₁	75.5^f	19. $7 a b$	10.9^f	10.0^f	7.0^c
	N₂	77. $7 e f$	20.1^a	11.7^e	11. $3 d e$	9. $3 a b$
	N₃	78.0^e	20.1^a	12. $1 c d e$	11.0^e	8.7^bc
W₂	N₁	81. $7 c d$	20.2^a	11. $9 d e$	11.7^d	10. $3 a b$
	M₂	83. $0 b c$	20.6^a	12. $3 c d$	12.3^c	11.0^a
	N₃	79. $7 d e$	19. $9 a b$	12. $2 c d e$	12. $8 a b c$	10. $3 a b$
W₃	N₁	81. $7 c d$	19. $3 a b$	12. $6 b c$	12. $7 b c$	9. $0 a b$
	N₂	85.7^a	20.5^a	13. $0 a b$	13. $0 a b$	10. $0 a b$
	N₃	84. $3 a b$	20.7^a	13.2^a	13.3^a	9. $3 a b$

表2 不同水氮互作下机采棉农艺性状变化

Table 2 The effects of different water and nitrogen interactions on the agronomic characteristics of mechanically harvested cotton

处理 Treatment		株高 Plant height (cm)	始果枝高 Branch High envoy (cm)	倒三叶宽 Inverted three leaves wide (cm)	真叶数 True leaf number (片)	果枝数 Number Fruit branch (台)
W₁	N₁	75.5^f	19. $7 a b$	10.9^f	10.0^f	7.0^c
	N₂	77. $7 e f$	20.1^a	11.7^e	11. $3 d e$	9. $3 a b$
	N₃	78.0^e	20.1^a	12. $1 c d e$	11.0^e	8.7^bc
W₂	N₁	81. $7 c d$	20.2^a	11. $9 d e$	11.7^d	10. $3 a b$
	M₂	83. $0 b c$	20.6^a	12. $3 c d$	12.3^c	11.0^a
	N₃	79. $7 d e$	19. $9 a b$	12. $2 c d e$	12. $8 a b c$	10. $3 a b$
W₃	N₁	81. $7 c d$	19. $3 a b$	12. $6 b c$	12. $7 b c$	9. $0 a b$
	N₂	85.7^a	20.5^a	13. $0 a b$	13. $0 a b$	10. $0 a b$
	N₃	84. $3 a b$	20.7^a	13.2^a	13.3^a	9. $3 a b$

表3 不同处理“三桃”数及所占比例

Table 3 The number and proportion of "three peaches" in different treatments

处理 Treatment		伏前桃数 Fuzen peach number		伏桃数 Number of volts		秋桃数 Number of autumn peaches
处理 Treatment		数值 Value	比例 Proportion(%)	数值 Value	比例 Proportion(%)	数值 Value	比例 Proportion(%)
W₁	N₁	2.48±0.02^a	33.83^b	3.02±0.0 $1 d e$	54.8 $5 d e$	0.83±0.02^c	11.32^c
	N₂	2.33±0.02^a	34.88^b	3.32±0.02^d	49.70^e	1.03±0.02^b	15.42^b
	N₃	2.43±0.03^a	39.32^a	2.88±0.03^e	46.60^e	0.87±0.03^c	14.07^b
W₂	N₁	1.53±0.04^b	21.16^c	4.33±0.0 $5 c d$	59.89^d	1.37±0.04^a	18.95^a
	N₂	1.12±0.02^c	14.09^d	5.78±0.02^a	72.70^a	1.05±0.02^b	13.21^b
	N₃	1.17±0.05^c	15.66^d	5.18±0.05^b	69.35^b	1.12±0.0 $3 a b$	14.99^b
W₃	N₁	1.07±0.04^c	15.99^d	4.62±0.04^c	69.06^b	1.00±0.04^b	14.95^b
	N₂	1.20±0.03^c	17.1 $7 c d$	4.57±0.04^c	65.38^c	1.22±0.0 $4 a b$	17.4 $5 a b$
	N₃	1.10±0.04^c	18.0 $6 c d$	4.12±0.02^d	67.65^c	0.87±0.05^c	14.29^b

表3 不同处理“三桃”数及所占比例

Table 3 The number and proportion of "three peaches" in different treatments

处理 Treatment		伏前桃数 Fuzen peach number		伏桃数 Number of volts		秋桃数 Number of autumn peaches
处理 Treatment		数值 Value	比例 Proportion(%)	数值 Value	比例 Proportion(%)	数值 Value	比例 Proportion(%)
W₁	N₁	2.48±0.02^a	33.83^b	3.02±0.0 $1 d e$	54.8 $5 d e$	0.83±0.02^c	11.32^c
	N₂	2.33±0.02^a	34.88^b	3.32±0.02^d	49.70^e	1.03±0.02^b	15.42^b
	N₃	2.43±0.03^a	39.32^a	2.88±0.03^e	46.60^e	0.87±0.03^c	14.07^b
W₂	N₁	1.53±0.04^b	21.16^c	4.33±0.0 $5 c d$	59.89^d	1.37±0.04^a	18.95^a
	N₂	1.12±0.02^c	14.09^d	5.78±0.02^a	72.70^a	1.05±0.02^b	13.21^b
	N₃	1.17±0.05^c	15.66^d	5.18±0.05^b	69.35^b	1.12±0.0 $3 a b$	14.99^b
W₃	N₁	1.07±0.04^c	15.99^d	4.62±0.04^c	69.06^b	1.00±0.04^b	14.95^b
	N₂	1.20±0.03^c	17.1 $7 c d$	4.57±0.04^c	65.38^c	1.22±0.0 $4 a b$	17.4 $5 a b$
	N₃	1.10±0.04^c	18.0 $6 c d$	4.12±0.02^d	67.65^c	0.87±0.05^c	14.29^b

表4 各处理棉铃空间分布

Table 4 Spatial distribution of cotton bolls in each

处理Treament		上部铃Upper boll			中部铃Middle boll			下部铃Lower boll
处理Treament		外围铃 Boll closer to steam	内围铃 Boll from to steam	总铃数 Total number of bells	外围铃 Boll closer to steam	内围铃 Boll from to steam	总铃数 Total number of bells	外围铃 Boll closer to steam	内围铃 Boll from to steam	总铃数 Total number of bells
W₁	N₁	1.04^a	1.3 $1 b c$	2.35^b	0.2 $0 a b$	2.2 $3 a b$	2.43^b	0.05^b	1.5^b	1.55^c
	N₂	0.82^b	1.63^b	2.85^a	0.3 $4 a b$	2.53^a	2.87^a	0.02^b	1.34^b	1.36^c
	N₃	0.92^b	1.52^b	2.44^b	0.52^a	2.1 $6 a b$	2.68^a	0.06^b	1.00^c	1.06^c
W₂	N₁	0.25^d	1.94^a	2.19^c	0.3 $0 a b$	2.1 $1 a b$	2.41^b	0.6 $9 a b$	1.9 $4 a b$	2.63^b
	N₂	0.20^d	2.02^a	2.22^c	0.42^a	2.1 $8 a b$	2.6 $0 a b$	1.05^a	2.08^a	3.13^b
	N₃	0.63^c	1.61^b	2.24^c	0.3 $4 a b$	2.2 $4 a b$	2.5 $8 a b$	0.5 $0 a b$	2.15^a	2.65^b
W₃	N₁	0.21^d	0.85^c	1.06^d	0.2 $3 a b$	2.42^a	2.65^a	1.32^a	1.9 $6 a b$	3.28^a
	N₂	0.24^d	0.84^c	1.08^d	0.12^b	2.42^a	2.5 $4 a b$	1.25^a	2.12^a	3.37^a
	N₃	0.15^d	0.40^d	0.55^e	0.14^b	2.38^a	2.5 $2 a b$	1.40^a	1.62^b	3.02^b

表4 各处理棉铃空间分布

Table 4 Spatial distribution of cotton bolls in each

处理Treament		上部铃Upper boll			中部铃Middle boll			下部铃Lower boll
处理Treament		外围铃 Boll closer to steam	内围铃 Boll from to steam	总铃数 Total number of bells	外围铃 Boll closer to steam	内围铃 Boll from to steam	总铃数 Total number of bells	外围铃 Boll closer to steam	内围铃 Boll from to steam	总铃数 Total number of bells
W₁	N₁	1.04^a	1.3 $1 b c$	2.35^b	0.2 $0 a b$	2.2 $3 a b$	2.43^b	0.05^b	1.5^b	1.55^c
	N₂	0.82^b	1.63^b	2.85^a	0.3 $4 a b$	2.53^a	2.87^a	0.02^b	1.34^b	1.36^c
	N₃	0.92^b	1.52^b	2.44^b	0.52^a	2.1 $6 a b$	2.68^a	0.06^b	1.00^c	1.06^c
W₂	N₁	0.25^d	1.94^a	2.19^c	0.3 $0 a b$	2.1 $1 a b$	2.41^b	0.6 $9 a b$	1.9 $4 a b$	2.63^b
	N₂	0.20^d	2.02^a	2.22^c	0.42^a	2.1 $8 a b$	2.6 $0 a b$	1.05^a	2.08^a	3.13^b
	N₃	0.63^c	1.61^b	2.24^c	0.3 $4 a b$	2.2 $4 a b$	2.5 $8 a b$	0.5 $0 a b$	2.15^a	2.65^b
W₃	N₁	0.21^d	0.85^c	1.06^d	0.2 $3 a b$	2.42^a	2.65^a	1.32^a	1.9 $6 a b$	3.28^a
	N₂	0.24^d	0.84^c	1.08^d	0.12^b	2.42^a	2.5 $4 a b$	1.25^a	2.12^a	3.37^a
	N₃	0.15^d	0.40^d	0.55^e	0.14^b	2.38^a	2.5 $2 a b$	1.40^a	1.62^b	3.02^b

表5 不同水氮互作下棉花产量及产量构成因素变化

Table 5 The effects of different water and nitrogen interactions on cotton yield and yield components

处理 Treatment		单铃重 Boll weight (g)	单株结铃数 Boll number per plant (个)	衣分 Lint percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm²)
W₁	N₁	5.55±0.0 $5 a b$	6.33±0.13^d	46.23±0.52^a	5 481.83±76.35^d
	N₂	5.58±0.0 $1 a b$	6.68±0.03^c	46.25±0.30^a	5 816.20±97.8 $0 b c$
	N₃	5.67±0.01^a	6.18±0.0 $3 b c$	45.24±0.0 $1 a b$	5 467.64±86.55^d
W₂	N₁	5.41±0.28^b	7.23±0.29^b	46.13±0.45^a	6 103.30±124.40^b
	N₂	5.70±0.17^a	7.95±0.15^a	46.42±0.06^a	7 070.84±76.45^a
	N₃	5.65±0.21^a	7.47±0.22^b	46.81±0.89^a	6 585.64±168.1 $5 a b$
W₃	N₁	5.43±0.25^b	6.69±0.30^c	46.74±0.44^a	5 668.33±93.45^c
	N₂	5.52±0.0 $7 a b$	6.99±0.1 $1 b c$	46.47±0.21^a	6 020.68±56.45^b
	N₃	5.54±0.4 $2 a b$	6.09±0.45^d	46.58±0.25^a	5 264.47±87.80^e
P值	W	<0.001	0.001	0.75	<0.001
	N	0.36	0.001	0.23	<0.001
	W×N	<00.01	0.021	1.192	<0.001

表5 不同水氮互作下棉花产量及产量构成因素变化

Table 5 The effects of different water and nitrogen interactions on cotton yield and yield components

处理 Treatment		单铃重 Boll weight (g)	单株结铃数 Boll number per plant (个)	衣分 Lint percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm²)
W₁	N₁	5.55±0.0 $5 a b$	6.33±0.13^d	46.23±0.52^a	5 481.83±76.35^d
	N₂	5.58±0.0 $1 a b$	6.68±0.03^c	46.25±0.30^a	5 816.20±97.8 $0 b c$
	N₃	5.67±0.01^a	6.18±0.0 $3 b c$	45.24±0.0 $1 a b$	5 467.64±86.55^d
W₂	N₁	5.41±0.28^b	7.23±0.29^b	46.13±0.45^a	6 103.30±124.40^b
	N₂	5.70±0.17^a	7.95±0.15^a	46.42±0.06^a	7 070.84±76.45^a
	N₃	5.65±0.21^a	7.47±0.22^b	46.81±0.89^a	6 585.64±168.1 $5 a b$
W₃	N₁	5.43±0.25^b	6.69±0.30^c	46.74±0.44^a	5 668.33±93.45^c
	N₂	5.52±0.0 $7 a b$	6.99±0.1 $1 b c$	46.47±0.21^a	6 020.68±56.45^b
	N₃	5.54±0.4 $2 a b$	6.09±0.45^d	46.58±0.25^a	5 264.47±87.80^e
P值	W	<0.001	0.001	0.75	<0.001
	N	0.36	0.001	0.23	<0.001
	W×N	<00.01	0.021	1.192	<0.001

参考文献 22

[1]	田立文, 徐海江, 孔杰, 等. 新疆棉花持续发展对策优化分析[J]. 中国纤检, 2018,(9):110-113.
	TIAN Liwen, XU Haijiang, KONG Jie, et al. Optimization and Analysis of Countermeasures for Sustainable Development of Cotton in Xinjiang[J]. China Fiber Inspection, 2018,(9):110-113.
[2]	张昊, 林涛, 尔晨, 崔建平, 等. 配置模式对南疆机采棉生长发育及产量形成的调控效应[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2018, 41(5):307-313.
	ZHANG Hao, LIN Tao, ER Chen, et al. Effects of Planting Patterns on Growth and Yield Formation for Machine-picked Cotton in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2018, 41(5):307-313.
[3]	杨培, 陈振, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 等. 对等密度条件下机采棉不同种植模式的综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(4):599-609. DOI
	YANG Pei, CHEN Zhen, Abudukadier Kuerban, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Planting Modes of Machine-picked Cotton under the Equal Density Condition[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(4):599-609. DOI
[4]	巨晓棠, 谷保静. 我国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4):783-795.
	JU Xiaotang GU Baojing. Status quo, problem and trend of nitrogen fertilization in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(4):783-795.
[5]	张伟, 李鲁华, 吕新. 水氮耦合对滴灌春小麦根系时空分布及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(11):47-51.
	ZHANG Wei, LI Luhua, LÜ Xin. Effects of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Spatial and Temporal Distributionsof Spring Wheat Roots and Yield under Drip Irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(11):47-51.
[6]	邵东国, 孙春敏, 王洪强, 等. 稻田水肥资源高效利用与调控模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(12):72-78.
	SHAO Dongguo, SUN Chunmin, WANG Hongqiang, et al. Simulation on regulation for efficient utilization of water and fertilizer resources in paddy fields[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(12):72-78.
[7]	张文斌, 张荣, 李文德, 等. 水肥耦合对河西绿洲板蓝根生理特性及产量影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(1):25-31.
	ZHANG Wenbin, ZHANG Rong, LI Wende, et al. Effect of Yield and Physiological Characteristics on Isatis tinctoria of Water and Fertilizer Coupling in Hexi Oasis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2017, 26(1):25-31.
[8]	Wang H,., Wu L,., Cheng M., et al. Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on yield, water and fertilizer use efficiency of drip-fertigated cotton in northern Xinjiang, China(Article)[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018:169-179.
[9]	李春艳, 张巨松, 石洪亮, 等. 密度与氮肥对机采棉叶铃分布的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(11):47-59.
	LI Chunyan, ZHANG Jusong, SHI Hongliang, et al. Effect of planting density and nitrogen application on the distribution of leaf and boll in machine picking cotton and its relationship with yield[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018, 23(11):47-59.
[10]	邢英英, 张富仓, 张燕, 等. 滴灌施肥水肥耦合对温室番茄产量、品质和水氮利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(4):713-726.
	XING Yingying, ZHANG Fucang, ZHANG Yan, et al. Effect of Irrigation and Fertilizer Coupling on Greenhouse Tomato Yield, Quality, Water and Nitrogen Utilization Under Fertigation[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(4):713-726.
[11]	李建明, 潘铜华, 王玲慧, 等. 水肥耦合对番茄光合、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(10):82-90.
	LI Jianming, PAN Tonghua, WANG Linghui, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on tomato photosynjournal, yield and water use efficiency[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(10):82-90.
[12]	何海兵, 杨茹, 廖江, 等. 水分和氮肥管理对灌溉水稻优质高产高效调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(2):305-318.
	HE Haibing, YANG Ru, LIAO Jiang, et al. Research Advance of High-Yielding and High Efficiency in Resource Use and Improving Grain Quality of Rice Plants Under Water and Nitrogen Managements in an Irrigated Region[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(2):305-318.
[13]	崔永生, 王峰, 孙景生, 等. 南疆机采棉田灌溉制度对土壤水盐变化和棉花产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11):3634-3642.
	CUI Yongsheng, WANG Feng, SUN Jingsheng, et al. Effects of irrigation regimes on the variation of soil water and salt and yield of mechanically harvested cotton in Southern Xinjiang, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(11):3634-3642.
[14]	高黎明, 周保平, 唐梓涯, 等. 不同水氮处理对棉花土壤水分迁移的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(Z1):118-119.
	GAO Liming, ZHOU Baoping, TANG Ziya, et al. Effects of Different Water and Nitrogen Treatments on Soil Water Movement in Cotton[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 26(Z1):118-119.
[15]	忠智博, 翟国亮, 邓忠, 等. 水氮施量对膜下滴灌棉花生长及水氮分布的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(1):67-76.
	ZHONG Zhibo, ZHAI Guoliang, DENG Zhong, et al. The Impact of N Application and Drip Irrigation Amount on Cotton Growth and Water and N Distributions in Soil Mulched with Film[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(1):67-76.
[16]	罗振, 辛承松, 李维江, 等. 部分根区灌溉与合理密植对旱区棉花产量和水分生产率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9):3137-3146. PMID
	LUO Zhen, XIN Chengsong, LI Weijiang, et al. Effects of partial root-zone irrigation and rational close planting on yield and water productivity of cotton in arid area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(9):3137-3146. DOI PMID
[17]	杜刚锋, 汪江涛, 孙雪冰, 等. 不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7):1177-1186. DOI
	DU Gangfeng, WANG Jiangtao, SUN Xuebing, et al. Effects of Irrigation Method and Irrigation Amount on Cotton Crown Leaf Boll Configuration[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(7):1177-1186. DOI
[18]	朱晓伟, 刘连涛, 万华龙, 等. 整枝方式和冠层高度对棉铃时空分布及产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(1):79-88.
	ZHU Xiaowei, LIU Liantao, WAN Hualong, et al. Effects of Pruning Methods and Canopy Patterns on the Temporal -Spatial Distribution of Cotton Bolls and Yield[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(1):79-88.
[20]	冯克云. 不同灌水量和施钾水平对棉花产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(6):44-49.
	FENG Keyun. Effect of different irrigation and potassium on cotton yield and its component factors[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009, 27(6):44-49.
[21]	谢志良, 田长彦. 膜下滴灌水氮耦合对棉花干物质积累和氮素吸收及水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1):160-165.
	XIE Zhiliang, TIAN Changyan. Coupling effects of water and nitrogen on dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and water-nitrogen use efficiency of cotton under mulched drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2011, 17(1):160-165.
[22]	余炳凤, 王海江, 侯振安, 等. 膜下滴灌水氮对不同生育期棉花根系与产量影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 33(3):265-269.
	YU Bingfeng, WANG Haijiang, HOU Zhenan, et al. Effect of Water-Nitrogen on Cotton Yield and Root Characteristics in Different Growth Stage under Mulching Drip Irrigation[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2015, 33(3):265-269.

水氮调配对等行距机采棉土壤、叶片水分及棉铃分布的影响

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Adjustment on the Distribution of Soil, Leaf Moisture and Bolls of Cotton Harvested with Equal Row Spacing

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘海军, 张昊, 王一帆, 陈茂光, 吴凤全, 林涛, 汤秋香. 不同覆盖材料和灌溉量对机采棉产量形成及有效积温生产效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100.
[2]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[5]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[6]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[7]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[8]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[9]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[10]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[11]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[12]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[13]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[14]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[15]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.