新疆农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 1652-1658.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.09.010

• 园艺·林业·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同品种西瓜营养质量的差异及评价指标

何伟忠1, 韦凯丽2, 华震宇1, 孙涛1, 陈贺1, 王成3   

  1. 1.新疆农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所/农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室/新疆农产品质量安全实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091;
    2.新疆农业大学食品科学与药学学院,乌鲁木齐 830052;
    3.新疆农业科学院科研管理处,乌鲁木齐 830091
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-08 发布日期:2019-10-30
  • 通信作者: 王成(1971-),男,陕西白河人,研究员,硕士,研究方向为农产品质量安全,(E-mail)wangcheng312@sina.com
  • 作者简介:何伟忠(1981-),男,山东平度人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为农产品质量安全,(E-mail)hewei198112@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-25);新疆维吾尔自治区天山雪松计划(2017XS07);自治区天山英才工程培养项目

Preliminary Study on Nutritional Quality Differences and Evaluation Indexes of Different Watermelon Varieties

HE Wei-zhong1, WEI Kai-li2, HUA Zhen-yu1, SUN Tao1, CHEN He1, WANG Cheng3   

  1. 1. Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Urumqi), Ministry of Agriculture/ Research Institute of Quality Standards & Testing Technology for Agro-products, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Urumqi 830091, China;
    2. College of Food Sciences and Pharmacy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
    3. Scientific Research Management Office of Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
  • Received:2019-05-08 Published:2019-10-30
  • Correspondence author: WANG Cheng(1971- ), male, native place: Baihe, Shanxi, master, research field: Agro-products quality and safety, (E-mail)wangchengxj321@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Earmarked Fund for China Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System(CARS-25);Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Tianshan Cedar Plan(2017XS07); Tianshan Excellence Engineering Training Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

摘要: 【目的】研究不同品种西瓜营养质量的差异及其评价指标。【方法】以6个不同品种西瓜为研究对象,分析样品中16种成分含量,并通过INQ(营养质量指数),研究受试成分营养质量的品种间差异,通过主成分分析,筛选营养质量评价指标。【结果】6种不同品种西瓜烟酸、脂肪、钠和锌INQ均小于1,碳水化合物INQ在1.38~1.44,钾和维生素B2 INQ均大于2;VB1、蛋白、纤维、锰、铁、钙、铜、磷和镁INQ因品种的不同而处于不同营养水平,其中VB1、镁、锰、铁4项指标的负荷量相对较高。【结论】VB1、蛋白、纤维、锰、铁、钙、铜、磷、镁可用于体现西瓜营养质量的品种间差异,其中VB1、镁、锰、铁指标适合作为西瓜营养质量评价指标。

关键词: 西瓜; 营养质量; 指标

Abstract: 【Objective】 To make clear the nutrition quality and evaluation indices of different varieties of watermelon. 【Method】16 components in 6 varieties watermelon were determined, the nutrition quality differences of components in varieties were studied by INQ (index of nutrition quality), and furthermore, though principal component analysis, the nutrition quality evaluation indices of watermelon were screened. 【Result】The results showed that the INQ of nicotinic acid, sodium, fat, zinc were lower than 1, the INQ of carbohydrate was 1.38~1.44, the INQs of potassium and VB2 were higher than 2, the INQs of manganese, VB1, protein, ferrum, calcium, cuprum, fiber, phosphorus, magnesium were different because of varieties, and among them, the loadings of magnesium, VB1, manganese, ferrum were relatively high. 【Conclusion】VB1, protein, fiber, manganese, ferrum, calcium, cuprum, phosphorus and magnesium embody the difference among varieties reflecting nutritional quality of watermelon, and among them, VB1,manganese, ferrum can be used as nutrition quality evaluation indices of watermelon.

Key words: watermelon; nutrition quality; index

中图分类号: 


ISSN 1001-4330 CN 65-1097/S
邮发代号:58-18
国外代号:BM3342
主管:新疆农业科学院
主办:新疆农业科学院 新疆农业大学 新疆农学会

出版单位:《新疆农业科学》编辑部
地址:乌鲁木齐市南昌路403号新疆农业科学院
邮编:830091
电话:0991-4502046
E-mail:xjnykx-h@xaas.ac.cn


版权所有 © 《新疆农业科学》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数:
网站
微信公众号
淘宝购买
微店购买