Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 2203-2210.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.015
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Forestry • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Chao1,2(), LI Yushan2, MA Yue2, SONG Yu2(
)
Received:
2024-03-02
Online:
2024-09-20
Published:
2024-10-09
Correspondence author:
SONG Yu
Supported by:
通讯作者:
宋羽
作者简介:
田超(1997-),女,新疆昌吉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为分子生物学,(E-mail)1505944372@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
TIAN Chao, LI Yushan, MA Yue, SONG Yu. Effects of different concentrations of sophora alopecuroides extract on the growth and soil fertility of continuous cropping tomatoes[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2203-2210.
田超, 李玉姗, 马越, 宋羽. 不同浓度苦豆子浸提液对连作番茄生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2203-2210.
处理 Treat- ments | 株高 Height (cm) | 化感指数 RI | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 化感 指数 RI | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll/ SPAD值 | 化感 指数 RI | 地上部分Aboveground | 地下部分Underground | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜重 Fresh weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | 干重 dry weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | 干重 dry weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | |||||||
CK | 10.38±0.29d | - | 2.8±0.05cd | - | 34.72±3.04d | - | 1.98±0.20d | - | 0.23±0.03cd | - | 0.69±0.14c | - | 0.047±0.011c | - |
T1 | 10.38±1.08d | 0.00 | 2.73±0.12d | -0.02 | 34.65±0.82d | 0.00 | 1.91±0.27d | -0.04 | 0.20±0.06d | -0.1 | 0.70±0.09c | 0.01 | 0.044±0.007c | -0.06 |
T2 | 11.45±1.81c | 0.09 | 2.79±0.09cd | 0.00 | 40.45±2.90c | 0.14 | 2.47±0.20d | 0.20 | 0.23±0.03cd | 0.0 | 0.74±0.10c | 0.07 | 0.048±0.009c | 0.02 |
T3 | 12.55±0.19b | 0.17 | 2.85±0.10c | 0.02 | 43.87±1.56b | 0.21 | 3.52±0.62c | 0.44 | 0.31±0.07bc | 0.3 | 0.83±0.15bc | 0.17 | 0.056±0.013bc | 0.16 |
T4 | 12.65±0.63b | 0.18 | 3.12±0.11b | 0.10 | 45.28±2.15b | 0.23 | 4.63±0.78b | 0.57 | 0.37±0.13b | 0.4 | 1.00±0.32ab | 0.31 | 0.069±0.025ab | 0.32 |
T5 | 13.55±0.59a | 0.23 | 3.29±0.10a | 0.15 | 48.25±2.85a | 0.28 | 5.57±0.93a | 0.64 | 0.54±0.10a | 0.6 | 1.17±0.22a | 0.41 | 0.084±0.020a | 0.44 |
Tab.1 Changes of different concentrations of Sophora alopecuroides extract on tomato growth indicators
处理 Treat- ments | 株高 Height (cm) | 化感指数 RI | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 化感 指数 RI | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll/ SPAD值 | 化感 指数 RI | 地上部分Aboveground | 地下部分Underground | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜重 Fresh weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | 干重 dry weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | 干重 dry weight (g) | 化感 指数 RI | |||||||
CK | 10.38±0.29d | - | 2.8±0.05cd | - | 34.72±3.04d | - | 1.98±0.20d | - | 0.23±0.03cd | - | 0.69±0.14c | - | 0.047±0.011c | - |
T1 | 10.38±1.08d | 0.00 | 2.73±0.12d | -0.02 | 34.65±0.82d | 0.00 | 1.91±0.27d | -0.04 | 0.20±0.06d | -0.1 | 0.70±0.09c | 0.01 | 0.044±0.007c | -0.06 |
T2 | 11.45±1.81c | 0.09 | 2.79±0.09cd | 0.00 | 40.45±2.90c | 0.14 | 2.47±0.20d | 0.20 | 0.23±0.03cd | 0.0 | 0.74±0.10c | 0.07 | 0.048±0.009c | 0.02 |
T3 | 12.55±0.19b | 0.17 | 2.85±0.10c | 0.02 | 43.87±1.56b | 0.21 | 3.52±0.62c | 0.44 | 0.31±0.07bc | 0.3 | 0.83±0.15bc | 0.17 | 0.056±0.013bc | 0.16 |
T4 | 12.65±0.63b | 0.18 | 3.12±0.11b | 0.10 | 45.28±2.15b | 0.23 | 4.63±0.78b | 0.57 | 0.37±0.13b | 0.4 | 1.00±0.32ab | 0.31 | 0.069±0.025ab | 0.32 |
T5 | 13.55±0.59a | 0.23 | 3.29±0.10a | 0.15 | 48.25±2.85a | 0.28 | 5.57±0.93a | 0.64 | 0.54±0.10a | 0.6 | 1.17±0.22a | 0.41 | 0.084±0.020a | 0.44 |
处理 Treat- ments | pH值 pH value | 电导率 EC(uS/cm) | 养分含量Nutrient Content | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 SOM (g/kg) | 全氮 TN (g/kg) | 全磷 TP (g/kg) | 全钾 TK (g/kg) | 碱解氮 AN (mg/kg) | 速效钾 AK (mg/kg) | 有效磷 AP (mg/kg) | |||
CK | 8.02±0.04c | 123.10±9.38e | 26.40±0.77b | 1.67±0.05d | 1.78±0.10a | 17.98±0.06a | 83.68±4.74e | 357.68±6.14e | 81.71±3.16a |
T1 | 8.30±0.01b | 190.57±7.16d | 27.87±0.31b | 1.66±0.01d | 1.53±0.04bc | 17.36±0.16a | 109.83±9.75d | 341.44±16.22e | 85.06±3.53a |
T2 | 8.37±0.06b | 215.33±1.16d | 27.93±0.70b | 1.74±0.03d | 1.49±0.06bc | 17.52±0.84a | 110.43±4.09d | 376.13±11.34d | 74.59±4.11b |
T3 | 8.43±0.01b | 346.17±13.62c | 27.83±1.43b | 1.93±0.04c | 1.45±0.05c | 17.08±0.33a | 151.87±4.65b | 436.55±3.42b | 81.05±2.46a |
T4 | 8.74±0.11a | 481.60±6.10b | 32.04±0.45a | 2.07±0.07b | 1.52±0.04bc | 17.33±0.66a | 140.80±1.31c | 410.98±5.11c | 83.03±1.32a |
T5 | 8.59±0.34ab | 646.23±45.40a | 32.69±0.73a | 2.43±0.11a | 1.58±0.05b | 17.44±0.38a | 202.57±5.62a | 778.25±10.32a | 72.87±1.67b |
Tab.2 Changes of different Concentrations of Sophora alopecuroides extract on Soil pH, EC Value, and nutrient content
处理 Treat- ments | pH值 pH value | 电导率 EC(uS/cm) | 养分含量Nutrient Content | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 SOM (g/kg) | 全氮 TN (g/kg) | 全磷 TP (g/kg) | 全钾 TK (g/kg) | 碱解氮 AN (mg/kg) | 速效钾 AK (mg/kg) | 有效磷 AP (mg/kg) | |||
CK | 8.02±0.04c | 123.10±9.38e | 26.40±0.77b | 1.67±0.05d | 1.78±0.10a | 17.98±0.06a | 83.68±4.74e | 357.68±6.14e | 81.71±3.16a |
T1 | 8.30±0.01b | 190.57±7.16d | 27.87±0.31b | 1.66±0.01d | 1.53±0.04bc | 17.36±0.16a | 109.83±9.75d | 341.44±16.22e | 85.06±3.53a |
T2 | 8.37±0.06b | 215.33±1.16d | 27.93±0.70b | 1.74±0.03d | 1.49±0.06bc | 17.52±0.84a | 110.43±4.09d | 376.13±11.34d | 74.59±4.11b |
T3 | 8.43±0.01b | 346.17±13.62c | 27.83±1.43b | 1.93±0.04c | 1.45±0.05c | 17.08±0.33a | 151.87±4.65b | 436.55±3.42b | 81.05±2.46a |
T4 | 8.74±0.11a | 481.60±6.10b | 32.04±0.45a | 2.07±0.07b | 1.52±0.04bc | 17.33±0.66a | 140.80±1.31c | 410.98±5.11c | 83.03±1.32a |
T5 | 8.59±0.34ab | 646.23±45.40a | 32.69±0.73a | 2.43±0.11a | 1.58±0.05b | 17.44±0.38a | 202.57±5.62a | 778.25±10.32a | 72.87±1.67b |
项目 Items | 第一主成分 1 st principal component | 第二主成分 2 nd principal component |
---|---|---|
蔗糖酶(INV) | 0.967 | 0.157 |
多酚氧化酶(PPO) | 0.878 | -0.035 |
脲酶(URE) | 0.967 | 0.021 |
过氧化氢酶(CAT) | 0.988 | -0.116 |
碱性磷酸酶(AKP) | 0.989 | 0.010 |
pH值(pH value) | 0.851 | -0.377 |
电导率(EC) | 0.984 | 0.084 |
有机质(SOM) | 0.891 | 0.061 |
全氮(TN) | 0.964 | 0.244 |
全磷(TP) | -0.423 | 0.818 |
全钾(TK) | -0.541 | 0.795 |
碱解氮(AN) | 0.971 | 0.046 |
速效钾(AK) | 0.844 | 0.460 |
有效磷(AP) | -0.514 | -0.494 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 10.402 | 2.012 |
方差贡献率 Proportion of variance (%) | 74.298 | 14.369 |
累积方差贡献率 Proportion of cumulative variance (%) | 74.298 | 88.667 |
Tab.3 Changes in two principal component coeffcients,eigen values and variance contribution rates
项目 Items | 第一主成分 1 st principal component | 第二主成分 2 nd principal component |
---|---|---|
蔗糖酶(INV) | 0.967 | 0.157 |
多酚氧化酶(PPO) | 0.878 | -0.035 |
脲酶(URE) | 0.967 | 0.021 |
过氧化氢酶(CAT) | 0.988 | -0.116 |
碱性磷酸酶(AKP) | 0.989 | 0.010 |
pH值(pH value) | 0.851 | -0.377 |
电导率(EC) | 0.984 | 0.084 |
有机质(SOM) | 0.891 | 0.061 |
全氮(TN) | 0.964 | 0.244 |
全磷(TP) | -0.423 | 0.818 |
全钾(TK) | -0.541 | 0.795 |
碱解氮(AN) | 0.971 | 0.046 |
速效钾(AK) | 0.844 | 0.460 |
有效磷(AP) | -0.514 | -0.494 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 10.402 | 2.012 |
方差贡献率 Proportion of variance (%) | 74.298 | 14.369 |
累积方差贡献率 Proportion of cumulative variance (%) | 74.298 | 88.667 |
处理 Treat- ments | 主成分1得分 1st principal component score | 主成分2得分 2nd principal component score | 综合得分 Comprehensive Score | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -3.96 | 1.89 | -2.67 | 6 |
T1 | -2.54 | -1.04 | -2.04 | 5 |
T2 | -1.28 | -0.15 | -0.97 | 4 |
T3 | 1.01 | -1.38 | 0.56 | 3 |
T4 | 1.92 | -0.94 | 1.29 | 2 |
T5 | 4.84 | 1.62 | 3.83 | 1 |
Tab.4 Comprehensive evaluation of soil under different concentrations of Sophora alopecuroides extract treatment
处理 Treat- ments | 主成分1得分 1st principal component score | 主成分2得分 2nd principal component score | 综合得分 Comprehensive Score | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -3.96 | 1.89 | -2.67 | 6 |
T1 | -2.54 | -1.04 | -2.04 | 5 |
T2 | -1.28 | -0.15 | -0.97 | 4 |
T3 | 1.01 | -1.38 | 0.56 | 3 |
T4 | 1.92 | -0.94 | 1.29 | 2 |
T5 | 4.84 | 1.62 | 3.83 | 1 |
[1] | 庞胜群, 王祯丽, 张润, 等. 新疆加工番茄产业现状及发展前景[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2005, (2): 273-278, 287. |
PANG Shengqun, WANG Zhenli, ZHANG Run, et al. Present situation and development prospect of processing tomato industry in Xinjiang[J]. China Vegetables, 2005, (2): 273-278, 287. | |
[2] | 郑慧. 设施蔬菜连作障碍形成原因及防治措施[J]. 南方农机, 2023, 54(6): 54-56. |
ZHENG Hui. Causes and control measures of obstacles in continuous cropping of protected vegetables[J]. China Southern Agricultural Machinery, 2023, 54(6): 54-56. | |
[3] | 王丽娟, 成英. 设施蔬菜连作障碍形成原因及防治技术[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2016, (6): 39-41. |
WANG Lijuan, CHENG Ying. Causes and control techniques of obstacles in continuous cropping of protected vegetables[J]. Shanghai Vegetables, 2016, (6): 39-41. | |
[4] | 何文革, 李兴莲. 苦豆子的应用及其在农业领域的开发前景[J]. 湖北畜牧兽医, 2008, 29(11): 34-35. |
HE Wenge, LI Xinglian. Application of Sophora alopecuroides and its development prospect in agricultural field[J]. Hubei Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2008, 29(11): 34-35. | |
[5] | 苏永霞, 冯平, 朝克图, 等. 苦豆子种子营养成分及其急性毒性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(5): 681-688. |
SU Yongxia, FENG Ping, CHAO Ketu, et al. Nutritional components and acute toxicity of Sophora alopecuroides seeds[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 681-688. | |
[6] | 李端, 周立刚, 王敬国, 等. 苦豆子提取物对黄瓜和番茄病原菌的抑制作用[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(3): 558-563. |
LI Duan, ZHOU Ligang, WANG Jingguo, et al. Inhibitory effects of Sophora alopecuroides extract to pathogens on cucumber and tomato[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006, 26(3): 558-563. | |
[7] | 高亮, 伏国, 伏民. 苦豆子及其生物制品在农业上的综合应用[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017, (24): 49-50, 53. |
GAO Liang, FU Guo, FU Min. Comprehensive utilization on agriculture of Sophora alopecurides L. and its biological products[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, (24): 49-50, 53. | |
[8] | 华羚淇, 宁静, 曾红. 苦参碱对番茄根际土壤微生态的影响[J]. 塔里木大学学报, 2021, 33(3): 22-32. |
HUA Lingqi, NING Jing, ZENG Hong. Effects of matrine on microecology of tomato rhizosphere soil[J]. Journal of Tarim University, 2021, 33(3): 22-32. | |
[9] | 余永婷, 冯作山. 苦豆子生物碱浸提物的抑菌性研究[J]. 农产品加工, 2018, (10): 22-24. |
YU Yongting, FENG Zuoshan. Study on antimicrobial activity of the extracts from Sophora alopecuroides L[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2018, (10): 22-24. | |
[10] | 石国庆, 隋晓青, 杨静, 等. 苦豆子根、茎、叶浸提液对4种牧草种子萌发的化感作用[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8):2223-2230. |
SHI Guoqing, SUI Xiaoqing, YANG Jing, et al. Allelopathic Effects of Extracts from Roots,Stems and Leaves of Sophora alopecuroides on Seed Germination of Four Forage Species[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8):2223-2230. | |
[11] | 麦麦提艾则孜·穆合塔尔,王东. 苦豆子浸提液对 “比斜克其” 甜瓜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2021, 41(3): 57-60, 67. |
Maimaitiaizezi Muhetaer, Wang Dong. Effects of different Sophora alopecuroides treatments on seed germination and seedling growth of “bixiekeqi” melon[J]. China Fruit & Vegetable, 2021, 41(3): 57-60, 67. | |
[12] | 陈波浪, 柴仲平, 吴海华, 等. 施用绿肥 (苦豆子鲜草) 对立架甜瓜土壤速效养分与产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015, (5): 94-98. |
CHEN Bolang, CHAI Zhongping, WU Haihua, et al. Influence on soil available nutrients and yield of trellis-cultivated melon with green manure (Sophora alopecuroides)[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015, (5): 94-98. | |
[13] | Bruce Williamson G, Richardson D. Bioassays for allelopathy: measuring treatment responses with independent controls[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1988, 14(1): 181-187. |
[14] | 齐晓晨, 赵库, 叶祖鹏, 等. 苦豆子绿肥对甜瓜生长及营养特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(6): 104-112. |
QI Xiaochen, ZHAO Ku, YE Zupeng, et al. Effects of Sophora alopecuroides green manure on growth and nutrient characteristics of melon[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 104-112. | |
[15] | 熊鑫, 郭树奇, 李琳, 等. 苦豆子生物碱对番茄生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(9): 1737-1746. |
XIONG Xin, GUO Shuqi, LI Lin, et al. Effect of Sophora alopecuroides alkaloids on tomato growth and fruit quality[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(9): 1737-1746. | |
[16] | Yin W, Yu A Z, Guo Y, et al. Growth trajectories of wheat-maize intercropping with straw and plastic management in arid conditions[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2020, 112(4): 2777-2790. |
[17] | 李振方, 杨燕秋, 谢冬凤, 等. 连作条件下地黄药用品质及土壤微生态特性分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(2): 217-224. |
LI Zhenfang, YANG Yanqiu, XIE Dongfeng, et al. Effects of continuous cropping on the quality of Rehmannia glutinosa L.and soil micro-ecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(2): 217-224. | |
[18] | 郭振威, 李永山, 王慧, 等. 长期棉花秸秆还田和施用有机肥对棉田土壤养分含量和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2023, 31(6):877-884 |
GUO Zhenwei, LI Yongshan, WANG Hui, et al. Effects of long-term cotton straw return and application of manure on soil nutrients and enzyme activity in cotton fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(6): 877-884. |
[1] | XU Maomao, GAO Jie, LI Junming, LI Xin, LIU Lei, PAN Feng. Population diversity analysis of 20 commercial tomato cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2191-2196. |
[2] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[3] | RUAN Xiangyang, PU Min, XIAO Lele, LUO Linyi, CHEN Ruijie, LI Ran, CHEN Guoyong, YE Jun. Effect of magnesium sulfate fertilizer application strategy on the yield and quality of processed tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 916-925. |
[4] | ZHAO Wenxuan, CHENG Yunxia, TAN Zhanming, LI Chunyu, SHU Sheng, Ayimaimu Shawuti, YANG Liyu, MIAO Xianjun. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic characteristics of different processed tomato varieties based on principal component analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2667-2675. |
[5] | WANG Lijun, SUN Beibei, WANG Chunyan, XIA Zhanfeng, MA Guocai. Isolation and nitrogen-fixing activity detection of bacteria from four desert plants [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2742-2749. |
[6] | LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, LI Yongfu, LI Na, XIN Huinan, BU Shengbing, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus uptake and utilization, and soil fertility of the extremely-late winter sown wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1335-1343. |
[7] | TIAN Jingyu, GAO Yan, GAO Xingwang, ZENG Jun, ZHAO Pengan, Subinuer Julaiti. Analysis of rhizospheric bacterial community structure and diversity of Hami melon under field cultivation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262. |
[8] | HE Wei, LUO Wenfang, YU Zhenhua, XU Jianjun, SUN Xiaojun. Growth Promoting Effect and Safety Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis JTB8-2 on Processed Tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1260-1269. |
[9] | FU Kaiyun, WANG Dian, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Tursun Ahmat, ZHANG Guoliang, FU Weidong, WEN Jun, Jiamaliding · Wulazahan, WANG La, GUO Wenchao. Screening of Antagonistic Plants: Ragweed and Giant Ragweed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 3030-3046. |
[10] | GAO Wencui, YANG Weijun, SHI Chunling, CHEN Lei. Study on Soil Organic Carbon and Its Change of Activity in Continuous Cropping Cotton Field under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1603-1609. |
[11] | NIU Ning, GUO Jinfen, JING Bo, JIANG Xiyao, ZHAO Mingwei, DIAO Ming. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Growth and Quality of Facility Cherry Tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2094-2102. |
[12] | Zaituniguli Kuerban , Tuerxun Tuerhong, ZHU Min, TU Zhendong, Aikebaier Yilahong. Effects of Continuous Cropping on Agronomic Shape and Yield of Sweet Sorghum No.3 [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(7): 1211-1222. |
[13] | LAI Ning, CHEN Shu-huang, FU Yan-bo, HUANG Jian, GENG Qing-long. Soil Fertility Evaluation of Orchards in Southern of Xinjiang Based on GIS [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(8): 1476-1486. |
[14] | LIU Xue-hua, ZHI Jin-hu, CHAI Zhao-hui, WANG De-sheng, YAO Yong-sheng, WANG Yuan, TANG Meng, SONG San-san, ZHENG Sen-yu. Effects of Different Abatement Measures of Continuous Cropping Obstacle on Yield Formation and Allelopathic Autotoxicity of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(3): 509-520. |
[15] | HE Hao, WEI Chang-zhou, LI Jun-hua, ZHANG Yu-tong. Effects of Commercial Organic Fertilizer Replacing Partial Chemical Fertilizer on Maize Growth,Yield and Soil Fertility [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(2): 325-332. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||