Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (2): 407-415.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.02.018
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Plant Protection·Microbes·Soil Fertilizer· Water Saving Irrigation • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Yijie1,2(), SHI Zhiyong2, Yusup Ablitip2, Aisajan Mamat1(
)
Received:
2022-08-22
Online:
2023-02-20
Published:
2023-03-31
Correspondence author:
Aisajan Maimait (1982-), male, associate research fellow,doctoral supervisor, research interest: fruit tree cultivation physiology and quality control,(E-mail)103326533@qq.com
Supported by:
曹艺洁1,2(), 史智勇2, 玉苏甫·阿不力提甫2, 艾沙江·买买提1(
)
通讯作者:
艾沙江·买买提(1982-),男,新疆人,副研究员,博士,研究方向为果树生理及品质调控,(E-mail)103326533@qq.com
作者简介:
曹艺洁(1997-),男,山西隰县人,硕士,研究方向为果树栽培生理与品质调控,(E-mail)1692666398@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
CAO Yijie, SHI Zhiyong, Yusup Ablitip, Aisajan Mamat. Analysis of Amino Acid and Mineral Elements in the Rough-skinned Fruits of Korla Pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 407-415.
曹艺洁, 史智勇, 玉苏甫·阿不力提甫, 艾沙江·买买提. 库尔勒香梨粗皮果矿质元素和氨基酸的含量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 407-415.
元素 Elements | 粗皮果 Rough- skinned Fruit | 正常果 Normal Fruit | 投影值 VIP | 显著性 P-value | 差异倍数 Fold change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
硼(B) | 1 909 | 1 629.67 | 1.172 | 0.003 | 0.854 |
钠(Na) | 5.98 | 12.40 | 1.208 | 0.000 | 2.074 |
镁(Mg) | 121.28 | 192.33 | 1.212 | 0.000 | 1.586 |
硅(Si) | 998 | 698.33 | 0.741 | 0.026 | 0.700 |
磷(P) | 62.47 | 112.00 | 1.21 | 0.000 | 1.793 |
钾(K) | 1 288.33 | 1 460.67 | 1.207 | 0.000 | 1.134 |
钙(Ca) | 21.23 | 67.40 | 1.201 | 0.000 | 3.175 |
锰(Mn) | 420 | 848.67 | 1.186 | 0.000 | 2.021 |
铁(Fe) | 3.66 | 4.60 | 0.15 | 0.941 | 1.257 |
镍(Ni) | 119.5 | 176 | 0.135 | 0.987 | 1.473 |
铜(Cu) | 473.67 | 528 | 1.041 | 0.028 | 1.115 |
锌(Zn) | 791.65 | 910.33 | 1.104 | 0.007 | 1.150 |
硒(Se) | 1.68 | 2.46 | 0.617 | 0.348 | 1.464 |
钼(Mo) | 3.60 | 6.52 | 0.809 | 0.157 | 1.811 |
Table 1 Differences in mineral element contents between rough-skinned and normal fruits(mg/kg)
元素 Elements | 粗皮果 Rough- skinned Fruit | 正常果 Normal Fruit | 投影值 VIP | 显著性 P-value | 差异倍数 Fold change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
硼(B) | 1 909 | 1 629.67 | 1.172 | 0.003 | 0.854 |
钠(Na) | 5.98 | 12.40 | 1.208 | 0.000 | 2.074 |
镁(Mg) | 121.28 | 192.33 | 1.212 | 0.000 | 1.586 |
硅(Si) | 998 | 698.33 | 0.741 | 0.026 | 0.700 |
磷(P) | 62.47 | 112.00 | 1.21 | 0.000 | 1.793 |
钾(K) | 1 288.33 | 1 460.67 | 1.207 | 0.000 | 1.134 |
钙(Ca) | 21.23 | 67.40 | 1.201 | 0.000 | 3.175 |
锰(Mn) | 420 | 848.67 | 1.186 | 0.000 | 2.021 |
铁(Fe) | 3.66 | 4.60 | 0.15 | 0.941 | 1.257 |
镍(Ni) | 119.5 | 176 | 0.135 | 0.987 | 1.473 |
铜(Cu) | 473.67 | 528 | 1.041 | 0.028 | 1.115 |
锌(Zn) | 791.65 | 910.33 | 1.104 | 0.007 | 1.150 |
硒(Se) | 1.68 | 2.46 | 0.617 | 0.348 | 1.464 |
钼(Mo) | 3.60 | 6.52 | 0.809 | 0.157 | 1.811 |
分类 Class | 氨基酸名称 Amino acids | 粗皮果 Rough-skinned fruit | 正常果 Normal fruit | 投影值 VIP | P值 P-value | 差异倍数 Fold change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
谷氨酸族 Glu pathway | 甘氨酸(Gly) | 163.35 | 104.58 | 1.07 | 0.001 | 1.56 |
脯氨酸 (Pro) | 20.148 | 5.49 | 1.08 | 0.003 | 3.67 | |
谷氨酸(Glu) | 1 993.13 | 1 978.59 | 0.94 | 0.806 | 1.01 | |
谷氨酰胺(Gln) | 591.77 | 315.13 | 1.07 | 0.000 | 1.88 | |
精氨酸(Arginine) | 64.97 | 26.03 | 1.081 | 0.000 | 2.50 | |
羟脯氨酸(Hyp) | 104.323 | 56.79 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 1.84 | |
鸟氨酸(Orn) | 13.16 | 4.23 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 3.12 | |
瓜氨酸(Cit) | 20.18 | 3.92 | 1.08 | 0.004 | 5.15 | |
氨基丁酸(GABA) | 969.45 | 510.06 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 1.90 | |
天冬氨酸族 Asp pathway | 天冬氨酸(Asp) | 8 918.79 | 7 465.51 | 1.06 | 0.000 | 1.20 |
苏氨酸(Thr) | 1 249.716 | 949.15 | 1.033 | 0.003 | 1.32 | |
天冬酰胺(Asn) | 18 246.36 | 16 827.9 | 0.88 | 0.066 | 1.08 | |
甲硫氨酸(Met) | 174.99 | 138.05 | 1.06 | 0.001 | 1.27 | |
赖氨酸(Ly) | 134.96 | 66.57 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 2.03 | |
芳香族 Aromatic amino acid pathway | 苯丙氨酸(Phe) | 92.82 | 59.86 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 1.55 |
酪氨酸(Tyr) | 2.06 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.003 | 1.89 | |
色氨酸(Try) | 5.59 | 2.97 | 1.07 | 0.000 | 1.88 | |
丙酮酸族 Pyruvate pathway | 丙氨酸(Ala) | 608.55 | 521.61 | 1.04 | 0.003 | 1.17 |
缬氨酸(Val) | 1764.75 | 1594.40 | 1.03 | 0.007 | 1.11 | |
丝氨酸族 Ser pathway | 丝氨酸(Ser) | 2 376.64 | 2 426.86 | 0.28 | 0.637 | 0.99 |
组氨酸族 His pathway | 组氨酸(His) | 113.81 | 17.22 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 6.61 |
3-甲基组氨酸(3-Mehis) | 21.77 | 18.59 | 0.79 | 0.17 | 1.17 | |
1-甲基组氨酸(1-Mehis) | 13.55 | 7.79 | 1.02 | 0.013 | 1.74 |
Table 2 Differences in amino acid contents between rough-skinned and normal fruit(nmol/L)
分类 Class | 氨基酸名称 Amino acids | 粗皮果 Rough-skinned fruit | 正常果 Normal fruit | 投影值 VIP | P值 P-value | 差异倍数 Fold change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
谷氨酸族 Glu pathway | 甘氨酸(Gly) | 163.35 | 104.58 | 1.07 | 0.001 | 1.56 |
脯氨酸 (Pro) | 20.148 | 5.49 | 1.08 | 0.003 | 3.67 | |
谷氨酸(Glu) | 1 993.13 | 1 978.59 | 0.94 | 0.806 | 1.01 | |
谷氨酰胺(Gln) | 591.77 | 315.13 | 1.07 | 0.000 | 1.88 | |
精氨酸(Arginine) | 64.97 | 26.03 | 1.081 | 0.000 | 2.50 | |
羟脯氨酸(Hyp) | 104.323 | 56.79 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 1.84 | |
鸟氨酸(Orn) | 13.16 | 4.23 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 3.12 | |
瓜氨酸(Cit) | 20.18 | 3.92 | 1.08 | 0.004 | 5.15 | |
氨基丁酸(GABA) | 969.45 | 510.06 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 1.90 | |
天冬氨酸族 Asp pathway | 天冬氨酸(Asp) | 8 918.79 | 7 465.51 | 1.06 | 0.000 | 1.20 |
苏氨酸(Thr) | 1 249.716 | 949.15 | 1.033 | 0.003 | 1.32 | |
天冬酰胺(Asn) | 18 246.36 | 16 827.9 | 0.88 | 0.066 | 1.08 | |
甲硫氨酸(Met) | 174.99 | 138.05 | 1.06 | 0.001 | 1.27 | |
赖氨酸(Ly) | 134.96 | 66.57 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 2.03 | |
芳香族 Aromatic amino acid pathway | 苯丙氨酸(Phe) | 92.82 | 59.86 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 1.55 |
酪氨酸(Tyr) | 2.06 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.003 | 1.89 | |
色氨酸(Try) | 5.59 | 2.97 | 1.07 | 0.000 | 1.88 | |
丙酮酸族 Pyruvate pathway | 丙氨酸(Ala) | 608.55 | 521.61 | 1.04 | 0.003 | 1.17 |
缬氨酸(Val) | 1764.75 | 1594.40 | 1.03 | 0.007 | 1.11 | |
丝氨酸族 Ser pathway | 丝氨酸(Ser) | 2 376.64 | 2 426.86 | 0.28 | 0.637 | 0.99 |
组氨酸族 His pathway | 组氨酸(His) | 113.81 | 17.22 | 1.08 | 0.000 | 6.61 |
3-甲基组氨酸(3-Mehis) | 21.77 | 18.59 | 0.79 | 0.17 | 1.17 | |
1-甲基组氨酸(1-Mehis) | 13.55 | 7.79 | 1.02 | 0.013 | 1.74 |
氨基酸组分 Amino acid Class | 粗皮果 Rough-skinned fruit | 正常果 Normal fruit | 粗皮果 Rough-skinned fruit(%) | 正常果 Normal fruit(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
谷氨酸族Glu pathway | 3 940.48 | 3 004.82 | 10.46 | 9.08 |
天冬氨酸族Asp pathway | 28 724.82 | 25 447.18 | 76.26 | 76.87 |
芳香族Aromatic pathway | 100.47 | 63.92 | 0.27 | 0.19 |
丙氨酸族Pyruvate pathway | 2 373.30 | 2 116.01 | 6.30 | 6.39 |
丝氨酸族Ser pathway | 2 376.64 | 2 426.86 | 6.31 | 7.33 |
组氨酸族 His pathway | 149.13 | 43.60 | 0.40 | 0.13 |
总游离氨基酸 Total free amino acids | 37 664.84 | 33 102.39 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Table 3 Proportions of different class of amino acids in total amino acids
氨基酸组分 Amino acid Class | 粗皮果 Rough-skinned fruit | 正常果 Normal fruit | 粗皮果 Rough-skinned fruit(%) | 正常果 Normal fruit(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
谷氨酸族Glu pathway | 3 940.48 | 3 004.82 | 10.46 | 9.08 |
天冬氨酸族Asp pathway | 28 724.82 | 25 447.18 | 76.26 | 76.87 |
芳香族Aromatic pathway | 100.47 | 63.92 | 0.27 | 0.19 |
丙氨酸族Pyruvate pathway | 2 373.30 | 2 116.01 | 6.30 | 6.39 |
丝氨酸族Ser pathway | 2 376.64 | 2 426.86 | 6.31 | 7.33 |
组氨酸族 His pathway | 149.13 | 43.60 | 0.40 | 0.13 |
总游离氨基酸 Total free amino acids | 37 664.84 | 33 102.39 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
成分 Components | 特征向量值 Eigenvalues | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 12.24 | 87.41 | 87.41 |
2 | 1.08 | 7.69 | 95.10 |
3 | 0.38 | 2.71 | 97.81 |
Table 4 Explanation of the total variance in principal component analysis on mineral elements
成分 Components | 特征向量值 Eigenvalues | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 12.24 | 87.41 | 87.41 |
2 | 1.08 | 7.69 | 95.10 |
3 | 0.38 | 2.71 | 97.81 |
元素名称 Mineral elements | PC1载荷 PC1 load | PC2载荷 PC2 load | PC1系数 PC1 coefficient | PC2系数 PC2 coefficient | PC1得分 PC1 score | PC2得分 PC2 score | 综合得分 Overall score | 综合排名 Overall ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钙(Ca) | 0.999 | 0.020 | 0.082 | 0.018 | 0.287 | 0.019 | 0.265 | 1 |
锰(Mn) | 0.995 | 0.001 | 0.081 | 0.001 | 0.284 | 0.001 | 0.261 | 2 |
钾(K) | 0.998 | -0.047 | 0.082 | -0.043 | 0.287 | -0.045 | 0.260 | 3 |
铁(Fe) | 0.991 | -0.008 | 0.081 | -0.008 | 0.284 | -0.008 | 0.260 | 4 |
钠(Na) | 0.998 | -0.059 | 0.082 | -0.055 | 0.287 | -0.057 | 0.259 | 5 |
镁(Mg) | 0.997 | -0.040 | 0.081 | -0.037 | 0.284 | -0.038 | 0.257 | 6 |
锌(Zn) | 0.960 | 0.064 | 0.078 | 0.060 | 0.273 | 0.062 | 0.256 | 7 |
磷(P) | 0.994 | -0.071 | 0.081 | -0.066 | 0.284 | -0.069 | 0.255 | 8 |
铜(Cu) | 0.903 | 0.194 | 0.074 | 0.181 | 0.259 | 0.188 | 0.253 | 9 |
钼(Mo) | 0.967 | -0.160 | 0.079 | -0.148 | 0.277 | -0.154 | 0.242 | 10 |
硒(Se) | 0.524 | 0.843 | 0.043 | 0.783 | 0.151 | 0.814 | 0.204 | 11 |
镍(Ni) | 0.854 | -0.496 | 0.070 | -0.461 | 0.245 | -0.479 | 0.186 | 12 |
硼(B) | -0.935 | 0.065 | -0.076 | 0.061 | -0.266 | 0.063 | -0.239 | 13 |
硅(Si) | -0.861 | -0.189 | -0.070 | -0.176 | -0.245 | -0.183 | -0.240 | 14 |
Table 5 Principal component analysis of mineral elements in the pulp of Korla fragrant pear
元素名称 Mineral elements | PC1载荷 PC1 load | PC2载荷 PC2 load | PC1系数 PC1 coefficient | PC2系数 PC2 coefficient | PC1得分 PC1 score | PC2得分 PC2 score | 综合得分 Overall score | 综合排名 Overall ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钙(Ca) | 0.999 | 0.020 | 0.082 | 0.018 | 0.287 | 0.019 | 0.265 | 1 |
锰(Mn) | 0.995 | 0.001 | 0.081 | 0.001 | 0.284 | 0.001 | 0.261 | 2 |
钾(K) | 0.998 | -0.047 | 0.082 | -0.043 | 0.287 | -0.045 | 0.260 | 3 |
铁(Fe) | 0.991 | -0.008 | 0.081 | -0.008 | 0.284 | -0.008 | 0.260 | 4 |
钠(Na) | 0.998 | -0.059 | 0.082 | -0.055 | 0.287 | -0.057 | 0.259 | 5 |
镁(Mg) | 0.997 | -0.040 | 0.081 | -0.037 | 0.284 | -0.038 | 0.257 | 6 |
锌(Zn) | 0.960 | 0.064 | 0.078 | 0.060 | 0.273 | 0.062 | 0.256 | 7 |
磷(P) | 0.994 | -0.071 | 0.081 | -0.066 | 0.284 | -0.069 | 0.255 | 8 |
铜(Cu) | 0.903 | 0.194 | 0.074 | 0.181 | 0.259 | 0.188 | 0.253 | 9 |
钼(Mo) | 0.967 | -0.160 | 0.079 | -0.148 | 0.277 | -0.154 | 0.242 | 10 |
硒(Se) | 0.524 | 0.843 | 0.043 | 0.783 | 0.151 | 0.814 | 0.204 | 11 |
镍(Ni) | 0.854 | -0.496 | 0.070 | -0.461 | 0.245 | -0.479 | 0.186 | 12 |
硼(B) | -0.935 | 0.065 | -0.076 | 0.061 | -0.266 | 0.063 | -0.239 | 13 |
硅(Si) | -0.861 | -0.189 | -0.070 | -0.176 | -0.245 | -0.183 | -0.240 | 14 |
成分 Compo- nents | 特征向量值 Eigenvalues | 方差百分比 Variance (%) | 累积 Cumulative (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.65 | 85.42 | 85.42 |
2 | 2.45 | 10.64 | 96.06 |
3 | 0.42 | 1.84 | 97.89 |
Table 6 Total variance interpretation o principal component analysis of amino acids
成分 Compo- nents | 特征向量值 Eigenvalues | 方差百分比 Variance (%) | 累积 Cumulative (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.65 | 85.42 | 85.42 |
2 | 2.45 | 10.64 | 96.06 |
3 | 0.42 | 1.84 | 97.89 |
氨基酸名称 Amino acids | PC1载荷 PC1 load | PC2载荷 PC2 load | PC1系数 PC1 coefficient | PC2系数 PC2 coefficient | PC1得分 PC1 score | PC2得分 PC2 score | 综合得分 Overall score | 综合排名 Overall ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苏氨酸(Thr) | 0.967 | 0.215 | 0.049 | 0.088 | 0.217 | 0.138 | 0.208 | 1 |
丙氨酸(Ala) | 0.977 | 0.103 | 0.050 | 0.042 | 0.222 | 0.066 | 0.204 | 2 |
羟脯氨酸(Hyp) | 0.995 | 0.034 | 0.051 | 0.014 | 0.226 | 0.022 | 0.203 | 3 |
鸟氨酸(Orn) | 0.994 | 0.018 | 0.051 | 0.007 | 0.226 | 0.011 | 0.202 | 4 |
组氨酸(His) | 0.995 | 0.007 | 0.051 | 0.003 | 0.226 | 0.005 | 0.201 | 5 |
甘氨酸(Gly) | 0.994 | 0.006 | 0.051 | 0.002 | 0.226 | 0.003 | 0.201 | 6 |
甲硫氨酸(Met) | 0.985 | 0.051 | 0.050 | 0.021 | 0.222 | 0.033 | 0.201 | 7 |
氨基丁酸(GABA) | 0.996 | -0.019 | 0.051 | -0.008 | 0.226 | -0.013 | 0.200 | 8 |
赖氨酸(Lys) | 0.999 | -0.020 | 0.051 | -0.008 | 0.226 | -0.013 | 0.200 | 9 |
色氨酸(Try) | 0.992 | -0.020 | 0.051 | -0.008 | 0.226 | -0.013 | 0.200 | 10 |
精氨酸(Arg) | 0.998 | -0.035 | 0.051 | -0.014 | 0.226 | -0.022 | 0.198 | 11 |
酪氨酸(Tyr) | 0.955 | 0.061 | 0.049 | 0.025 | 0.217 | 0.039 | 0.197 | 12 |
苯丙氨酸(Phe) | 0.997 | -0.054 | 0.051 | -0.022 | 0.226 | -0.034 | 0.197 | 13 |
脯氨酸 (Pro) | 0.994 | -0.056 | 0.051 | -0.023 | 0.226 | -0.036 | 0.197 | 14 |
谷氨酰胺(Glu) | 0.992 | -0.008 | 0.050 | -0.003 | 0.222 | -0.005 | 0.196 | 15 |
缬氨酸(Val) | 0.962 | 0.041 | 0.049 | 0.017 | 0.217 | 0.027 | 0.196 | 16 |
1-甲基组氨酸 (1-MeHis) | 0.939 | 0.025 | 0.048 | 0.01 | 0.213 | 0.016 | 0.191 | 17 |
瓜氨酸(Cit) | 0.992 | -0.091 | 0.050 | -0.037 | 0.222 | -0.058 | 0.191 | 18 |
3-甲基组氨酸 (3-MeHis) | 0.769 | 0.509 | 0.039 | 0.208 | 0.173 | 0.326 | 0.190 | 19 |
天冬氨酸(Asp) | 0.978 | -0.160 | 0.050 | -0.065 | 0.222 | -0.102 | 0.186 | 20 |
天冬酰胺(Asn) | 0.765 | -0.573 | 0.039 | -0.234 | 0.173 | -0.366 | 0.113 | 21 |
谷氨酸(Glu) | 0.146 | 0.925 | 0.007 | 0.378 | 0.031 | 0.592 | 0.093 | 22 |
丝氨酸(Ser) | -0.187 | 0.947 | -0.009 | 0.387 | -0.040 | 0.606 | 0.032 | 23 |
Table 7 Principal component analysis of amino acids in the pulp of Korla fragrant pear
氨基酸名称 Amino acids | PC1载荷 PC1 load | PC2载荷 PC2 load | PC1系数 PC1 coefficient | PC2系数 PC2 coefficient | PC1得分 PC1 score | PC2得分 PC2 score | 综合得分 Overall score | 综合排名 Overall ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苏氨酸(Thr) | 0.967 | 0.215 | 0.049 | 0.088 | 0.217 | 0.138 | 0.208 | 1 |
丙氨酸(Ala) | 0.977 | 0.103 | 0.050 | 0.042 | 0.222 | 0.066 | 0.204 | 2 |
羟脯氨酸(Hyp) | 0.995 | 0.034 | 0.051 | 0.014 | 0.226 | 0.022 | 0.203 | 3 |
鸟氨酸(Orn) | 0.994 | 0.018 | 0.051 | 0.007 | 0.226 | 0.011 | 0.202 | 4 |
组氨酸(His) | 0.995 | 0.007 | 0.051 | 0.003 | 0.226 | 0.005 | 0.201 | 5 |
甘氨酸(Gly) | 0.994 | 0.006 | 0.051 | 0.002 | 0.226 | 0.003 | 0.201 | 6 |
甲硫氨酸(Met) | 0.985 | 0.051 | 0.050 | 0.021 | 0.222 | 0.033 | 0.201 | 7 |
氨基丁酸(GABA) | 0.996 | -0.019 | 0.051 | -0.008 | 0.226 | -0.013 | 0.200 | 8 |
赖氨酸(Lys) | 0.999 | -0.020 | 0.051 | -0.008 | 0.226 | -0.013 | 0.200 | 9 |
色氨酸(Try) | 0.992 | -0.020 | 0.051 | -0.008 | 0.226 | -0.013 | 0.200 | 10 |
精氨酸(Arg) | 0.998 | -0.035 | 0.051 | -0.014 | 0.226 | -0.022 | 0.198 | 11 |
酪氨酸(Tyr) | 0.955 | 0.061 | 0.049 | 0.025 | 0.217 | 0.039 | 0.197 | 12 |
苯丙氨酸(Phe) | 0.997 | -0.054 | 0.051 | -0.022 | 0.226 | -0.034 | 0.197 | 13 |
脯氨酸 (Pro) | 0.994 | -0.056 | 0.051 | -0.023 | 0.226 | -0.036 | 0.197 | 14 |
谷氨酰胺(Glu) | 0.992 | -0.008 | 0.050 | -0.003 | 0.222 | -0.005 | 0.196 | 15 |
缬氨酸(Val) | 0.962 | 0.041 | 0.049 | 0.017 | 0.217 | 0.027 | 0.196 | 16 |
1-甲基组氨酸 (1-MeHis) | 0.939 | 0.025 | 0.048 | 0.01 | 0.213 | 0.016 | 0.191 | 17 |
瓜氨酸(Cit) | 0.992 | -0.091 | 0.050 | -0.037 | 0.222 | -0.058 | 0.191 | 18 |
3-甲基组氨酸 (3-MeHis) | 0.769 | 0.509 | 0.039 | 0.208 | 0.173 | 0.326 | 0.190 | 19 |
天冬氨酸(Asp) | 0.978 | -0.160 | 0.050 | -0.065 | 0.222 | -0.102 | 0.186 | 20 |
天冬酰胺(Asn) | 0.765 | -0.573 | 0.039 | -0.234 | 0.173 | -0.366 | 0.113 | 21 |
谷氨酸(Glu) | 0.146 | 0.925 | 0.007 | 0.378 | 0.031 | 0.592 | 0.093 | 22 |
丝氨酸(Ser) | -0.187 | 0.947 | -0.009 | 0.387 | -0.040 | 0.606 | 0.032 | 23 |
[1] | 高启明, 李疆, 李阳. 库尔勒香梨研究进展[J]. 经济林研究, 2005,(1):79-82. |
GAO Qiming, LI Jiang, LI Yang. Research progress of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Economic Forest Research, 2005,(1):79-82. | |
[2] | 刘艳, 吴运建. 库尔勒香梨研究进展[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2015, 38(2):23-26. |
LIU Yan, WU Yunjian. Research progress of korla fragrant pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2015, 38 (2):23-26. | |
[3] | 李养义, 张峰, 关晓媛. ‘库尔勒香梨’产业发展优势、问题及对策[J]. 北方果树, 2019, (5): 45-48. |
LI Yangyi, ZHANG Feng, GUAN Xiaoyuan. Development advantages, problems and countermeasures of 'Korla fragrant Pear' industry[J]. Northern Fruit Trees, 2019,(5): 45-48. | |
[4] | 翟晓东, 齐曼·尤努斯, 张峰, 等. 库尔勒香梨粗皮果形成与叶片、土壤养分状况的相关性研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(1):14-19. |
ZHAO Xiaodong, Qiman Yunus, ZHANG Feng, et al. Study on the correlation between the formation of rough fruit and the Nutrient status of Leaves and Soil in Korla pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52 (1):14-19. | |
[5] | 李疆, 任莹莹, 覃为铭, 等. 库尔勒香梨粗皮果的初步研究[J]. 塔里木大学学报, 2008,(3):8-10. |
LI Jiang, REN Yingying, QIN Weiming, et al. Preliminary study on rough peel fruit of Korla pear[J]. Journal of Tarim University, 2008, (3): 8-10. | |
[6] | 马宏超. 库尔勒香梨果实脱萼宿萼和粗皮果的显微结构及品质研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2010. |
MA Hongchao. Study on the microstructure and quality of calyx abscission and calyx persistence and rough pericarp fruit of Korla pear[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2010. | |
[7] | 文旭. 不同有机钙肥对库尔勒香梨果实相关品质的影响研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2012. |
WEN Xu. Effects of different organic calcium fertilizer on fruit quality of Korla fragrant pear[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2012. | |
[8] | 翟晓东. 库尔勒香梨粗皮果的形成及提高果实品质的措施研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2014. |
ZHAI Xiaodong. Study on the formation of rough peel fruit of Korla fragrant pear and the measures to improve fruit quality[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[9] | Hu Y, Schmidhalter U. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Science, 2010, 168(4):541-549. |
[10] | 彭波, 孙艳芳, 庞瑞华, 等. 植物氨基酸转运蛋白的研究进展[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(6):1238-1243. |
PENG Bo, SUN Yanfang, PANG Ruihua, et al. Research progress of Amino acid transporters in plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37 (6): 1238-1243. | |
[11] |
位杰, 蒋媛, 林彩霞, 等. 6个库尔勒香梨品种果实矿质元素与品质的相关性和通径分析[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(4):259-265.
DOI |
WEI Jie, JIANG Yuan, LIN Caixia, et al. Correlation and path analysis of mineral elements and fruit quality in 6 Korla pear cultivars[J]. Food Science, 2019, 40(4): 259-265.
DOI |
|
[12] |
夏热帕提·艾则孜, 覃伟明, 努尔麦麦提·艾麦提, 等. 库尔勒香梨粗皮果果实不同部位矿质元素含量动态变化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(12):2188-2195.
DOI |
Sharepati Aizezi, TAN Weiming, Nurmamati Aimaiti, et al. A Study on the Dynamic Changes of Mineral Element Contents in Different Parts of Roughbark Fruit of Korla Fragrant Pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55 (12):2188-2195. | |
[13] | 刘红玲, 张新婉, 黄玮, 等. 植物氨基酸转运子研究进展[J]. 植物科学学报, 2018, 36(4):623-631. |
LIU Hongling, ZHANG Xinwan, HUANG Wei, et al. Advances in plant amino acid transporters[J]. Journal of Plant Science, 2018, 36 (4): 623-631. | |
[14] |
Pinkerton A, Simpson J R. Interactions of surface drying and subsurface nutrients affecting plant-growth on acidic soil profiles from an old pasture[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1986, 26: 681-689.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Asgher M, Khan N A,Khan, et al. Ethylene production is associated with alleviation of cadmiuminduced oxidativestress by sulfur in mustard types differing in ethylene sensitivity[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014, 106: 54-61.
DOI PMID |
[16] |
Fatma M, Masood A, Per T S, et al. Nitric oxide alleviates salt stress inhibited photosynthetic performance by interacting with sulfur assimilation in mustard[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 521.
DOI PMID |
[17] |
Verbruggen N, Hermans C. Physiological and molecular responses to magnesium nutritional imbalance in plants[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 368: 87-99.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Fatma M, Asgher M, Masood A, et al. Excess sulfur supplementation improves photosynthesis and growth in mustard under salt stress through increased production of glutathione[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2014, 107: 55-63.
DOI URL |
[19] | Jatav K S, Agarwal R M, Tomar N S, et al. Nitrogen metabolism, growth and yield responses of wheat (Triticumaestivum L) to restricted water supply and varying potassium treatments[J]. Indian Bot. Soc, 2014, 93: 177-189. |
[20] | Ahanger M A, Agarwal R M, Tomar N S, et al. Potassium induces positive changes in nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant system of oat (Avenasativa L cultivar Kent)[J]. Plant Inter, 2015, 10 (1): 211-223 |
[21] | Sharma G L, Agarwal R M. Potassium-induced changes in nitrate reductase activity in Cicer arietinum L. Ind[J]. Plant Physiol, 2002, 7: 221-226. |
[22] | Tomar N S, Agarwal R M. 2013. Influence of treatment of Jatropha curcas L. leachates and potassium on growth and phytochemical constituents of wheat (Triticumaestivum L)[J]. Amer. Plant Sci, 2013, 4: 1134-1150. |
[23] | Ahanger M A, Agarwal R M. Potassium improves antioxidant metabolism and alleviates growth inhibition under water and osmotic stress in wheat (Triticumaestivum L)[J]. Protoplasma, 2012, 54 (4): 1471-1486. |
[24] | 张立新, 张林森, 李丙智, 等. 旱地苹果矿质营养及其在生长发育中的作用[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2007,(3):111-115. |
ZHANG Lixin, ZHANG Linsen, LI Bingzhi, et al. Mineral Nutrition Elements and Their Roles in Growth and Development of Apple Trees in Arid Areas[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2007,(3):111-115. | |
[25] | 肖瑛, 康建军. 营养元素对植物抗旱性作用的研究综述[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2013,(1): 42-46. |
XIAO Ying, KANG Jianjun. Review of the Study of the Drought-Resistant Effects of Nutritional Elements on Plants[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013,(1): 42-46. | |
[26] | 邵月霞, 牛建新, 何子顺. 影响库尔勒香梨果实脱萼宿萼因素研究[J]. 西北园艺(果树专刊), 2007(2):39-40. |
SHAO Yuexia, NIU Jianxin, HE Zishun. Factors affecting the decalyx of Korla fragrant pear t[J]. Northwest Gardening (Fruit Tree Special Issue), 2007 (2): 39-40. | |
[27] | Kowalczyk K, Zielony T, Gajewski M. Effect of Aminoplant and Asahi on yield and quality of lettuce grown on rockwool. Conf. of biostimulators in modern agriculture[C]. D brow Z T, 2008: 35-43. |
[28] |
Sadak M S H, Abdelhamid M T, Schmidhalter U. Effect of foliar application of aminoacids on plant yield and some physiological parameters in bean plants irrigated with seawater[J]. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 2015, 20(1): 141-152.
DOI URL |
[29] | Souri M K. Aminochelate fertilizers: The new approach to the old problem[J]. A review. Open Agriculture, 2016, 1(1): 118-123. |
[30] | Shekari G, JavanmardiJ. Effects of foliar application pure amino acid and amino acid containing fertilizer on broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) transplants[J]. Advances in Crop Science and Technology, 2017, 5(3): 1-4. |
[31] | Hasanuzzaman M. Plant Tolerance to Environmental Stress:Role of Phytoprotectants (1st ed.)[M]. Boca Raton. CRC Press, 2019, 12: 175-195. |
[32] |
Fraser C M, Chapple C. The phenylpropanoid pathway in Arabidopsis[J]. The Arabidopsi Book, 2011, 9: e 0152.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Mamat A, Tusong K, Xu J, et al. Identification of metabolic pathways related to rough-skinned fruit formation in pear[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2021, 288: 110414.
DOI URL |
[1] | WANG Qingpeng, YAN Chengcai, WANG Zhe, GOU Changqing, WANG Lan, FENG Hongzu, HAO Haiting. Anther bacterial diversity of Korla Fragrant Pear before and after flowering [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1976-1982. |
[2] | XU Jinzong, BAO Jianping. Effects of different irrigation amounts on storage quality of Korla fragrant pear fruit under irrigation mode [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1696-1709. |
[3] | MA Xiangyu, BAN Xue, TANG Li, SU Xuanle, LIU Zhenya, ZHANG Wangbin. Effect of horticultural pruning of Korla fragrant pear trees during the growth period on pear fire blight [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1441-1446. |
[4] | GAO Mutian, XIAO Yanmei, LIAO Zhijie, HUANG Cheng. Comprehensive evaluation of kernel and quality traits in maize-teosinte introgression line population [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 885-891. |
[5] | CUI Yutong, ZHANG Cuifang, WANG Shiwei. Observation on phenological period and fruit setting characteristics of bud transmutation material of Korla fragrant pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 365-372. |
[6] | LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, GAO Yuan, MA Quanhui, LI Zhiguo, MA Xing. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on diurnal changes of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of sand-cultivated tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3006-3013. |
[7] | XU Bin, WANG Zheng, SONG Zhanteng, Merhaba Paerhati, ZHU Jingrong, CHE Fengbin, LI Yonghai, WU Fengyan, MIAO Fuhong. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031. |
[8] | ZHAO Shasha, WANG Shiwei, ZHANG Cuifang, HAO Honglong, GUO Tong, YANG Xianan, YANG Wenjie. Analysis of the relationship between walnut leaf scorch disease and mineral elements [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2750-2760. |
[9] | TANG Li, TIAN Kechuan, ZHANG Xinning, LIU Li, Abulikemu Adili, YANG Zhi, YANG Cunming, ZHANG Xiaoxue, HUANG Xixia, TIAN Yuezhen. Clustering and principal component analysis of Hotan sheep body weight indexes in different growth stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2853-2860. |
[10] | ZHANG Xinyu, Munire Mutalifu, YE Yijie, FENG Qian, ZHANG Zhidong. Determination of nutrient components and structural analysis of polysaccharides from wild Boletus [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2557-2565. |
[11] | FENG Mei, XIAO Lijuan, ZHANG Shiqing, WANG Jingjing. Effects of soil nutrients on amino acids in junzao jujube orchard [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 136-147. |
[12] | OUYANG Danhua, ZHAO Kang, SONG Dongbo, LIU Ziqing, GUO Wangzhen, LIU Yan, GU Aixing, Azhatiguli Maimaitituer, Alikaerjiang Amaier. Identification and comprehensive analysis of Verticillium wilt resistance in 35 cotton strains [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 9-18. |
[13] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[14] | CAO Yijie, Aishajiang maimaiti, Xianmisiya Tayifu, SHI Zhiyong, Yusufu Abulitifu. Comparison of fruit stalk difference between different types of Korla fragrant pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1442-1450. |
[15] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||