产植酸酶益生乳酸菌的筛选

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.025

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 2290-2298.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.025

• 植物保护·微生物·畜牧兽医·土壤肥料 • 上一篇下一篇

产植酸酶益生乳酸菌的筛选

王浩中¹^,²(), 林青², 曾军², 高雁², 赵燕慧³, 时红玲², 马贵军³, 马正海¹, 娄恺²(), 霍向东²()

1.新疆大学生命科学与技术学院,乌鲁木齐 830046
2.新疆农业科学院微生物应用研究所/新疆特殊环境微生物实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆天康饲料有限公司,新疆五家渠 750300

收稿日期:2024-02-14 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-10-09
通信作者: 娄恺(1968-),男,河南人,研究员,博士,研究方向为微生物学,(E-mail)loukai02@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn;
霍向东(1974-),男,甘肃人,副研究员,博士,研究方向为微生物资源,(E-mail)xiangdonghuo@163.com
作者简介:王浩中(1997-),男,甘肃人,硕士研究生,研究方向为微生物学,(E-mail)490335311@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团重点研发计划专项(2022AB013);农业科技创新稳定支持项目(xjnkywdzc-2023005-6)

Screening of phytase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria

WANG Haozhong¹^,²(), LIN Qing², ZENG Jun², GAO Yan², ZHAO Yanhui³, SHI Hongling², MA Guijun³, MA Zhenghai¹, LOU Kai²(), HUO Xiangdong²()

1. College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2. Xinjiang Laboratory of Special Environmental Microbiology / Institute of Microbiology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. Xinjiang Tiankang Feed Co., Ltd, Wujiaqiu Xinjiang 750300, China

Received:2024-02-14 Published:2024-09-20 Online:2024-10-09
Supported by:
Key R & D Program of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(2022AB013);Project for Stable Support to Agricultural Sci-Tech Renovation(xjnkywdzc-2023005-6)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】分离筛选产植酸酶益生乳酸菌菌株。【方法】以发酵饲料、博扎、浆水为代表的发酵样品中,分离筛选出形态差异菌株,通过产酶筛选及16S rDNA分子鉴定,获得产植酸酶乳酸菌菌株,并通过耐酸、耐胆盐、耐肠胃液、自聚集力及抑菌分析对其进行评价。【结果】筛选出4株产植酸酶乳酸菌,其中菌株JS5植酸酶酶活高达0.83 U/mL,与植物乳杆菌菌株 DSM 20174相似性为100%,确定该菌株为植物乳杆菌(Lactiplantibacillus plantarum)。菌株JS5在pH值3条件下存活率高达100%,在胆盐浓度0.1%时JS5存活率为0.55%,在模拟肠液和胃液中,存活率分别为8.56%和0.38%,其活菌数均在1×10⁶CFU/mL以上,达到发挥益生作用的最小活菌数要求。菌株JS5自聚集力为(9.69%±0.44%),可促进菌株在肠道定殖。菌株JS5发酵液对大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、白色念珠菌、铜绿假单胞菌均有抑制作用。【结论】植保乳杆菌JS5产植酸酶较高,可在模拟肠胃液中存活,具有良好的细胞黏附能力和抑制病原菌生长,可用于益生的畜禽微生态制剂。

关键词: 乳酸菌; 植酸酶; 筛选

Abstract:

【Objective】 To isolate and characterization phytase production probiotic lactic acid bacteria. 【Methods】 Morphologically different strains were isolated from fermented feed, boza and Jiangshui. Through enzyme production screening and 16S rDNA molecular identification, phytase producing lactic acid bacteria strains were obtained and evaluated through acid tolerance, bile salt tolerance, intestinal and gastric juice tolerance, self-aggregation ability, and antibacterial analysis. 【Results】 Four phytase producing lactic acid bacteria were identified. Among them, strain JS5, which was 100% similar to Lactobacillus paracasei JCM 1171, with a maximum phytase activity of 0.83 U/mL. The strain was designated as lactobacillus paracasei. The survival rate of strain JS5 under pH 3 was as high as 100%. At a bile salt concentration of 0.1%, the survival rate of JS5 was 0.55%. In simulated gastric juice and intestinal juice, the survival rates were 8.56% and 0.38%,respectively, and the number of viable bacteria was above 1×10⁶CFU/mL, which was the lowest viable bacteria number with beneficial effects. The self-aggregation ability of strain JS5 was (9.69±0.44), which can promote the colonization of strain JS5 in the intestine. It had inhibitory effects on Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 【Conclusion】 Lactobacillus paracasei JS5 has a high phytase production and can survive in simulated gastrointestinal fluid. It has good cell adhesion ability and inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria and can be used as a probiotics for livestock and poultry.

Key words: lactic acid bacteria; phytase; screen

中图分类号:

S188

王浩中, 林青, 曾军, 高雁, 赵燕慧, 时红玲, 马贵军, 马正海, 娄恺, 霍向东. 产植酸酶益生乳酸菌的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2290-2298.

WANG Haozhong, LIN Qing, ZENG Jun, GAO Yan, ZHAO Yanhui, SHI Hongling, MA Guijun, MA Zhenghai, LOU Kai, HUO Xiangdong. Screening of phytase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2290-2298.

图/表 10

参考文献 35

[15]	Ahire J J, Jakkamsetty C, Kashikar M S, et al. In vitro evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum UBLP40 isolated from traditional indigenous fermented food[J]. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2021, 13(5): 1413-1424.
[16]	袁丽红, 柳成东, 肖明霞, 等. 三株饲用枯草芽孢杆菌抑菌性能的比较研究[J]. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(1): 87-95.
	YUAN Lihong, LIU Chengdong, XIAO Mingxia, et al. Comparation on the antibacterial properties of three Bacillus subtilis strains[J]. Feed Industry, 2023, 44(1): 87-95.
[17]	王笋, 吕嘉枥, 辛博, 等. 西北地区泡菜中乳酸杆菌的生物学特性[J]. 中国调味品, 2014, 39(3): 15-18.
	WANG Sun, LYU Jiali, XIN Bo, et al. Biological characteristics of lactic acid bacteria from pickles in northwest of China[J]. China Condiment, 2014, 39(3): 15-18.
[18]	赵小茜, 魏旭丹, 陈戴玲, 等. 产多糖植物乳杆菌的耐酸耐胆盐能力[J]. 乳业科学与技术, 2016, 39(3): 1-3.
	ZHAO Xiaoxi, WEI Xudan, CHEN Dailing, et al. Acid and bile salt tolerance of exopolysaccharide-producing strains of Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. Journal of Dairy Science and Technology, 2016, 39(3): 1-3.
[19]	王祎然, 韦明明, 张涵, 等. 酸汤中乳酸菌的鉴定及其耐酸、耐胆盐和抗氧化活性[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(16): 121-126, 139.
	WANG Yiran, WEI Mingming, ZHANG Han, et al. Identification, acid and bile salt tolerance, and antioxidant ability of lactic acid bacteria isolated from sour soup[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(16): 121-126, 139.
[20]	冯秀娟, 左芳雷, 陈丽丽, 等. 乳酸菌耐酸耐胆盐分析与胆盐水解酶研究[J]. 中国食品学报, 2013, 13(11): 139-147.
	FENG Xiujuan, ZUO Fanglei, CHEN Lili, et al. Analysis of acid and bile salt tolerance and study on bile salt hydrolase in lactic acid bacteria[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2013, 13(11): 139-147.
[21]	Merritt M E, Donaldson J R. Effect of bile salts on the DNA and membrane integrity of enteric bacteria[J]. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2009, 58(Pt 12): 1533-1541.
[22]	向双云, 周珍辉, 关文怡, 等. 来源于鸡肠道的乳酸菌的筛选及其饲用性的评价[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2017, 53(2): 97-101, 168.
	XIANG Shuangyun, ZHOU Zhenhui, GUAN Wenyi, et al. Screening lactic acid bacteria derived from adult chicken intestinal gut and evaluation for their implications in chicken feeding[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 53(2): 97-101, 168.
[23]	Sakandar H A, Kubow S, Sadiq F A. Isolation and in-vitro probiotic characterization of fructophilic lactic acid bacteria from Chinese fruits and flowers[J]. LWT, 2019, (104): 70-75.
[24]	杨晓宇, 张七斤, 于晨龙, 等. 不同来源乳酸菌的耐酸耐胆盐试验[J]. 动物医学进展, 2014, 35(2): 73-77.
	YANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Qijin, YU Chenlong, et al. Tolerance assays to acid and bile salt of Lactobacillus from different sources[J]. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2014, 35(2): 73-77.
[25]	Chou L S, Weimer B. Isolation and characterization of acid- and bile-tolerant isolates from strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1999, 82(1): 23-31.
[26]	覃志成, 周笑犁, 吴承木, 等. 番茄发酵液中乳酸杆菌的分离鉴定及对模拟胃肠液耐受性研究[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2023, 42(8): 54-61.
	QIN Zhicheng, ZHOU Xiaoli, WU Chengmu, et al. Isolation and identification of Lactobacillus in tomato fermentation broth and investigation of its tolerance to simulated gastrointestinal environment[J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2023, 42(8): 54-61.
[27]	程秀芳, 王丛丛, 谷巍. 乳酸菌在体外模拟胃肠环境中的抗性研究及其发酵特性[J]. 齐鲁药事, 2012, 31(1): 6-8.
	CHENG Xiufang, WANG Congcong, GU Wei. Study on the tolerance in vitro imitative gastroenteric environment and the fermentation properties of lactobacillus[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 31(1): 6-8.
[1]	王亚林, 严建芳, 李睿, 等. 植酸酶固体发酵工艺的研究[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2002, (4): 34-35.
	WANG Yalin, YAN Jianfang, LI Rui, et al. Study on the solid fermentation technology of phytase[J]. Cereal & Feed Industry, 2002, (4): 34-35.
[2]	Selle P H, Macelline S P, Chrystal P V, et al. The contribution of phytate-degrading enzymes to chicken-meat production[J]. Animals, 2023, 13(4): 603.
[3]	Zhou J R, Jr Erdman J W. Phytic acid in health and disease[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1995, 35(6): 495-508.
[4]	何进, 徐思杨, 刘波, 等. 乳酸菌在农业和食品加工中的应用研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2022, 42(4): 1-11.
	HE Jin, XU Siyang, LIU Bo, et al. Advance on applied researches of lactic acid bacteria in AgricuLture and food industry[J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2022, 42(4): 1-11.
[5]	Borda-Molina D, Zuber T, Siegert W, et al. Effects of protease and phytase supplements on small intestinal microbiota and amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens[J]. Poultry Science, 2019, 98(7): 2906-2918.
[6]	Pirgozliev V, Bedford M R. Energy utilisation and growth performance of chicken fed diets containing graded levels of supplementary bacterial phytase[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2013, 109(2): 248-253.
[7]	Ajith S, Ghosh J, Shet D, et al. Partial purification and characterization of phytase from Aspergillus foetidus MTCC 11682[J]. AMB Express, 2019, 9(1): 3.
[8]	Shah P C, Kumar V R, Dastager S G, et al. Phytase production by Aspergillus niger NCIM 563 for a novel application to degrade organophosphorus pesticides[J]. AMB Express, 2017, 7(1): 66.
[9]	Trivedi S, Husain I, Sharma A. Purification and characterization of phytase from Bacillus subtilis P6: Evaluation for probiotic potential for possible application in animal feed[J]. Food Frontiers, 2022, 3(1): 194-205.
[28]	Trunk T, Khalil H S, Leo J C. Bacterial autoaggregation[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 140-164.
[29]	Khan F, Tabassum N, Kim Y M. A strategy to control colonization of pathogens: embedding of lactic acid bacteria on the surface of urinary catheter[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2020, 104(21): 9053-9066.
[30]	Xin G, Porres Jm, Mullaney, et al. Phytase: source, structure and[J]. Industrial Enzymes: Structure, Function and Applications, 2007: 505-529.
[31]	曹伟超, 罗昆, 程新, 等. 高产植酸酶乳酸菌及其黑豆酸面团发酵低植酸营养面包研究[J]. 食品与机械, 2021, 37(2): 186-193.
	CAO Weichao, LUO Kun, CHENG Xin, et al. Studies on screening of high-yield phytase-producing lactic acid bacteria and its low-phytate nutritional breads through black bean sourdough fermentation[J]. Food & Machinery, 2021, 37(2): 186-193.
[32]	麦日艳古·亚生,伊力米热·热夏提, 努尔古丽·热合曼. 北疆传统发酵生奶酪中乳酸菌的耐受性及益生特性测定[J]. 微生物学通报, 2023, 50(5): 2044-2062.
	Mairiyangu Yasheng, Yilimire rexiati, Nuermanguli Reheman. Tolerance and probiotic characteristics of lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented raw cheese in northern Xinjiang[J]. Microbiology China, 2023, 50(5): 2044-2062.
[33]	Heo J, Shin D, Chang S Y, et al. Comparative genome analysis and evaluation of probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum strain JDFM LP11[J]. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 2018, 38(5): 878-888.
[34]	吴雨甍, 孙羊羊, 尹亚格, 等. 酱香型白酒酒醅中乳酸菌的分离鉴定及其益生特性研究[J]. 中国酿造, 2023, 42(4): 76-82.
	WU Yumeng, SUN Yangyang, YIN Yage, et al. Isolation identification and probiotic characteristics of lactic acid bacteria in fermented grains of sauce-flavor Baijiu[J]. China Brewing, 2023, 42(4): 76-82.
[35]	鲍国樱, 余行, 王孝义, 等. 散养云南地方猪源乳酸菌分离、鉴定及其益生特性的研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(8): 5418-5429.
[10]	Danial E N, Alkhalf M I. Purification and characterization of phytase from novel slated Bacillus cereus EME 48 and study its kinetic properties[J]. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 2016, 10(4): 2521-2529.
[11]	Çakır E, Arıcı M, Durak M Z. Biodiversity and techno-functional properties of lactic acid bacteria in fermented hull-less barley sourdough[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2020, 130(5): 450-456.
[12]	张洪. 产植酸酶乳酸杆菌的筛选及对肉鸡生长性能和粪磷排出量的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2009.
	ZHANG Hong. Screening of Phytase-producing Lactobacilli and Their Effect on Growth Performance and Phosphrous Excretion of Broiler Chicken[D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2009.
[13]	Sandez Penidez S H, Velasco Manini M A, Gerez C L, et al. Partial characterization and purification of phytase from Lactobacillus plantarum CRL1964 isolated from pseudocereals[J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2020, 60(9): 787-798.
[14]	Raghavendra P, Halami P M. Screening, selection and characterization of phytic acid degrading lactic acid bacteria from chicken intestine[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2009, 133(1/2): 129-134.
[35]	BAO Guoying, YU Hang, WANG Xiaoyi, et al. Isolation, identification and probiotic characteristics of lactic acid bacteria derived from free range local pigs in Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(8): 5418-5429.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	7	0	0	35

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	25	17
比例	60%	40%

摘要

124

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	124

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	34	90
比例	27%	73%

菌株 Strain	透明圆直径 D (mm)	菌落直径 d (mm)	直径比 D (d)
F9	35.00±6.67	14.85±2.96	2.21±0.72
F10	35.15±3.40	17.00±0.77	1.87±0.48
T7	32.58±2.10	15.18±0.25	1.88±0.49
S1	12.05±0.69	7.38±0.13	1.50±0.27
J1	15.93±2.01	8.30±0.25	1.73±0.42
F4	27.85±1.82	16.28±0.15	1.58±0.31
JS2	16.13±0.62	9.53±0.34	1.54±0.30
JS5	11.45±0.15	7.23±0.11	1.44±0.23
J6	7.40±0.16	6.15±0.11	1.16±0.07
F1	21.55±2.06	14.13±0.36	1.44±0.27
F2	16.05±2.79	12.33±0.33	1.30±0.20
T8	11.28±0.69	8.05±0.72	1.36±0.09
F11	18.45±1.56	15.63±1.24	1.18±0.02
S2	9.10±0.07	6.95±0.11	1.27±0.08
F8	20.05±1.25	15.55±0.35	1.23±0.09
T4	9.30±0.16	7.30±0.12	1.22±0.08
SC1	14.00±0.14	12.43±0.37	1.10±0.04
T1	10.95±0.57	7.33±0.78	1.42±0.28
T3	7.73±0.80	6.75±0.27	1.12±0.09
F7	38.08±0.68	18.55±0.67	1.77±0.43
F6	22.43±2.46	14.23±0.73	1.48±0.30
T2	9.18±0.08	7.28±0.15	1.19±0.10

菌株 Strain	透明圆直径 D (mm)	菌落直径 d (mm)	直径比 D (d)
F9	35.00±6.67	14.85±2.96	2.21±0.72
F10	35.15±3.40	17.00±0.77	1.87±0.48
T7	32.58±2.10	15.18±0.25	1.88±0.49
S1	12.05±0.69	7.38±0.13	1.50±0.27
J1	15.93±2.01	8.30±0.25	1.73±0.42
F4	27.85±1.82	16.28±0.15	1.58±0.31
JS2	16.13±0.62	9.53±0.34	1.54±0.30
JS5	11.45±0.15	7.23±0.11	1.44±0.23
J6	7.40±0.16	6.15±0.11	1.16±0.07
F1	21.55±2.06	14.13±0.36	1.44±0.27
F2	16.05±2.79	12.33±0.33	1.30±0.20
T8	11.28±0.69	8.05±0.72	1.36±0.09
F11	18.45±1.56	15.63±1.24	1.18±0.02
S2	9.10±0.07	6.95±0.11	1.27±0.08
F8	20.05±1.25	15.55±0.35	1.23±0.09
T4	9.30±0.16	7.30±0.12	1.22±0.08
SC1	14.00±0.14	12.43±0.37	1.10±0.04
T1	10.95±0.57	7.33±0.78	1.42±0.28
T3	7.73±0.80	6.75±0.27	1.12±0.09
F7	38.08±0.68	18.55±0.67	1.77±0.43
F6	22.43±2.46	14.23±0.73	1.48±0.30
T2	9.18±0.08	7.28±0.15	1.19±0.10

Strain	Bile salt (0%) viable count(CFU/mL)	Bile salt (0.1%) viable count(CFU/mL)	Survival rate (%)	Bile salt (0.2%) viable count(CFU/mL)	Survival rate (%)
J6	(2.85±0.05)×10⁸	(2.45±0.55)×10⁶	0.86	-	-
S1	(5.75±0.65)×10⁸	-	0	-	-
JS5	(8.25±0.35)×10⁸	(4.56±0.36)×10⁶	0.55	-	-
JS2	(4.31±0.41)×10⁸	-	0	-	-

Strain	Bile salt (0%) viable count(CFU/mL)	Bile salt (0.1%) viable count(CFU/mL)	Survival rate (%)	Bile salt (0.2%) viable count(CFU/mL)	Survival rate (%)
J6	(2.85±0.05)×10⁸	(2.45±0.55)×10⁶	0.86	-	-
S1	(5.75±0.65)×10⁸	-	0	-	-
JS5	(8.25±0.35)×10⁸	(4.56±0.36)×10⁶	0.55	-	-
JS2	(4.31±0.41)×10⁸	-	0	-	-

Strain	0 h viable count (CFU/mL)	6 h viable count (CFU/mL)	Survival rate (%)
J6	(0.53±0.15)×10⁸	(4.90±0.85)×10⁷	92.45
S1	(7.57±0.47)×10⁸	(3.93±0.13)×10⁸	51.92
JS5	(1.32±0.07)×10⁹	(1.13±0.06)×10⁸	8.56
JS2	(1.10±0.12)×10⁹	(0.80±0.14)×10⁷	0.73

产植酸酶益生乳酸菌的筛选

Screening of phytase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

Strain	0 h viable count (CFU/mL)	3 h viable count (CFU/mL)	Survival rate (%)
J6	(7.05±0.35)×10⁸	(1.95±0.21)×10⁸	27.66
S1	(7.95±1.06)×10⁸	(1.40±0.28)×10⁷	1.76
JS5	(1.68±0.22)×10⁹	(6.33±1.15)×10⁶	0.38
JS2	(0.35±0.07)×10⁸	(1.85±0.35)×10⁷	52.86

菌株 Strains	Diameter of Bacteriostatic circle(mm)
菌株 Strains	大肠杆菌 Escherichia coli	沙门氏菌 Salmonella	金黄色葡萄球菌 Staphylococcus aureus	白色念珠菌 Candida albicans	铜绿假单胞菌 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
JS5-1	14.57±0.12^c	19.43±0.55^a	14.30±0.44^b	18.07±0.15^c	14.87±0.32^b
JS5-2	15.80±0.26^b	16.73±0.12^d	13.73±0.32^b	17.33±0.21^d	14.23±0.21^cd
JS2-1	15.83±0.30^b	17.23±0.12^c	12.87±0.32^c	17.63±0.12^d	13.67±0.21^e
JS2-2	14.43±0.20^c	17.80±0.26^b	16.30±0.20^a	16.73±0.32^e	14.97±0.06^b
S1-1	15.97±0.42^b	17.97±0.15^b	14.03±0.21^b	19.30±0.36^a	13.97±0.15^de
S1-2	16.77±0.38^a	18.13±0.35^b	13.73±0.64^b	18.83±0.12^b	14.60±0.26^bc
J6-1	11.50±0.17^e	16.00±0.10^e	-	13.33±0.21^f	12.59±0.40^f
J6-2	12.57±0.12^d	13.57±0.12^f	11.30±0.26^d	13.43±0.11^f	20.90±0.36^a

[1]	孙建, 李雪, 楚敏, 顾美英, 艾尼江·尔斯满, 朱静, 何齐, 谭慧林, 张志东. 原驼乳中乳酸菌的分离筛选及特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 1021-1028.
[2]	康民泰, 杜孝敬, 张燕红, 陈玉环, 文孝荣, 唐福森, 赵志强, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 新疆盐渍区水稻品种生育表现与耐盐性筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 591-598.
[3]	李肖, 陈永成, 黄嵘峥, 许平珠, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 向日葵副产物中优势乳酸菌和纤维素分解菌的生理生化特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 607-614.
[4]	齐平, 索银·图娅, 魏杨, 张硕, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 阿地里·艾合买提. 10种药剂防治梅下毛瘿螨的田间防效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2761-2768.
[5]	孔晓双, 魏然, 董应宏, 侯敏, 买尔哈巴·艾合买提, 侯新强, 杨文琦, 崔卫东. 乌拉尔甘草不同组织可培养内生菌分离筛选及产β-葡萄糖苷酶菌株初筛[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 199-208.
[6]	何齐, 冯倩, 李雪, 易鸳鸯, 顾美英, 朱静, 孙建, 张志东. 赛里木酸奶中乳酸菌的分离鉴定及特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2323-2330.
[7]	哈力旦·依克热木, 刘娜, 刘联正, 周安定, 姜奇彦, 达买力江·合孜尔, 曹俊梅, 张新忠. 小麦近缘种芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1118-1126.
[8]	窦子微, 杨璐, 程平, 张志刚, 李宏. 不同品种桑葚营养品质分析及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 127-139.
[9]	郑瑞明, 王莉, 张军高, 鄢蓉, 李进, 梁晶, 雷斌, 周小云. 16种植物甲醇提取物对小麦萌发及幼苗生长活性筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 32-42.
[10]	赛静忆, 温玥, 郝志超, 田嘉. 梨幼果FWL1膜系统酵母双杂交三框cDNA文库构建及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1877-1888.
[11]	张建强, Abdramane salah zene, 王江来, 李佳佳, 张晓梦, 吴康莉, 田永强. 芹菜叶斑病病原菌细极链格孢药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1748-1757.
[12]	贺婷婷, 王旭哲, 宋磊, 马春晖. 不同添加剂对油莎豆青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1767-1775.
[13]	李枭, 郭栋良, 李恭泽, 薛敏, 江海霞, 叶佳丽, 谢丽琼. 亚麻萌发期耐盐鉴定体系优化及150份种质耐盐性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1438-1449.
[14]	伊力夏提·艾热提, 李伟, 徐杨林, 严宏孟, 戴志伟, 周建中. 传统发酵酸凝硬质奶酪中乳酸菌的分离鉴定及其体外益生特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1491-1501.
[15]	李俊茹, 秦宁, 李文龙, 杜汇, 李喜焕, 张彩英. 大豆籽粒低聚糖及其组分含量鉴定与特异种质筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 353-360.