新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 32-42.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.005
• 作物遗传育种 · 耕作栽培 · 种质资源 · 生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
郑瑞明1,2(), 王莉2,3, 张军高1,3,4, 鄢蓉2, 李进1,3, 梁晶1,3, 雷斌1,3(
), 周小云1,3(
)
收稿日期:
2022-05-18
出版日期:
2023-01-20
发布日期:
2023-03-07
通信作者:
雷斌(1973-),男,四川巴中人,研究员,博士,研究方向为农药研制及作物化控技术,(E-mail)leib668@xaas.ac.cn;作者简介:
郑瑞明(1996-),男,安徽合肥人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农作物化控技术与产品,(E-mail)196685079@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHENG Ruiming1,2(), WANG Li2,3, ZHANG Jungao1,3,4, YAN Rong2, LI Jin1,3, LIANG Jing1,3, LEI Bin1,3(
), ZHOU Xiaoyun1,3(
)
Received:
2022-05-18
Published:
2023-01-20
Online:
2023-03-07
Correspondence author:
LEI Bin (1973-), male, from Sichuan Province, researcher, PhD, research direction: crop chemical control research, (E-mail)leib668@xaas.ac.cn;Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】分析植物甲醇提取物对小麦萌发及幼苗生长的调节作用,筛选出生长调节活性较好的新型植物源提取物并确定适宜的浓度范围。【方法】以推广春麦品种新春44号为材料,以蒸馏水处理为对照,将16种农业药用植物甲醇提取物浸膏分别制备成4种不同浓度(10%、1%、0.1%、0.01%)的溶液。采用发芽试验筛选与盆栽试验验证,测定小麦幼苗的叶长、茎粗、地上部分干鲜重、内源激素含量以及光合特性等指标,运用隶属函数法与主成分分析法评价效果最优的植物源提取物并确定适宜的浓度范围。【结果】与对照比较,0.01%苦豆子、苦草和孜然甲醇提取物浸种发芽势分别增加10.00%、8.83%、7.62%;根长分别提高23.44%、21.88%、18.75%。筛选出0.1%苦豆子、0.01%苦豆子、0.01%孜然、1%苦草、0.1%苦草、0.01%苦草、10%曼陀罗和0.01%大戟提取物,0.01%苦豆子和苦草提取物叶长分别提高16.62%、15.91%;0.01%孜然与苦豆子提取物处理的小麦鲜重分别增加14.78%、5.15%。综合评价前3位分别为0.01%苦豆子、0.01%苦草和0.01%孜然提取物,对小麦具有一定的促生潜力。【结论】苦豆子、苦草、孜然3种低浓度甲醇提取物小麦种子萌发与幼苗生长效果较好,能够调控小麦内源激素水平,促进幼苗生长。
中图分类号:
郑瑞明, 王莉, 张军高, 鄢蓉, 李进, 梁晶, 雷斌, 周小云. 16种植物甲醇提取物对小麦萌发及幼苗生长活性筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 32-42.
ZHENG Ruiming, WANG Li, ZHANG Jungao, YAN Rong, LI Jin, LIANG Jing, LEI Bin, ZHOU Xiaoyun. Screening and Evaluation of Wheat Germination and Seedling Growth Activity by 16 Plant Methanol Extracts[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 32-42.
科名 Familys | 种名 Species | 供试部位 Extraction parts | 采集地点 Location |
---|---|---|---|
茄科Solanaceae | 曼陀罗Datura metel | 整株 | 轮台县 |
柏科Cupressaceae | 线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | 枝叶 | 新和县 |
莎草科Cyperaceae | 猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | 茎叶 | 疏勒县 |
水鳖科Hydrocharitacea | 苦草Vallisneria natans | 枝叶 | 巴楚县 |
胡颓子科Elaeagnaceae | 沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | 枝叶 | 巴楚县 |
含羞草科Mimosaceae | 金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | 枝叶 | 麦盖提县 |
藜科Chenopodiaceae | 灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
大戟科Euphorbiaceae | 大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | 茎叶 | 昭苏县 |
唇形科Labiatae | 黄芩Scutellariabaicalensis | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
牛至Organum vulgare | 茎叶 | 昭苏县 | |
蒺藜科Zygophyllaceae | 小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | 枝叶 | 库车县 |
伞形科Umbelliferae | 毒参Hemlock | 茎叶 | 昭苏县 |
孜然Cuminum cyminum | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 | |
豆科Hemlock | 苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | 枝叶 | 疏勒县 | |
黄芪Astragali Radix | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
表1 供试植物材料
Table 1 Plant material for testing
科名 Familys | 种名 Species | 供试部位 Extraction parts | 采集地点 Location |
---|---|---|---|
茄科Solanaceae | 曼陀罗Datura metel | 整株 | 轮台县 |
柏科Cupressaceae | 线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | 枝叶 | 新和县 |
莎草科Cyperaceae | 猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | 茎叶 | 疏勒县 |
水鳖科Hydrocharitacea | 苦草Vallisneria natans | 枝叶 | 巴楚县 |
胡颓子科Elaeagnaceae | 沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | 枝叶 | 巴楚县 |
含羞草科Mimosaceae | 金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | 枝叶 | 麦盖提县 |
藜科Chenopodiaceae | 灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
大戟科Euphorbiaceae | 大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | 茎叶 | 昭苏县 |
唇形科Labiatae | 黄芩Scutellariabaicalensis | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
牛至Organum vulgare | 茎叶 | 昭苏县 | |
蒺藜科Zygophyllaceae | 小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | 枝叶 | 库车县 |
伞形科Umbelliferae | 毒参Hemlock | 茎叶 | 昭苏县 |
孜然Cuminum cyminum | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 | |
豆科Hemlock | 苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | 枝叶 | 疏勒县 | |
黄芪Astragali Radix | 整株 | 玛纳斯县 |
处理Treatment | 编号Number | 处理Treatment | 编号Number |
---|---|---|---|
10%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-1 | 10%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-1 |
1%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-2 | 1%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-2 |
0.1%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-3 | 0.1%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-3 |
0.01%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-4 | 0.01%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-4 |
10%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-1 | 10%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-1 |
1%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-2 | 1%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-2 |
0.1%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-3 | 0.1%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-3 |
0.01%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-4 | 0.01%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-4 |
10%苦草Vallisneria natans | Y3-1 | 10%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-1 |
1%苦草Vallisneria natans | Y3-2 | 1%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-2 |
0.1%苦草Vallisneria natans | Y3-3 | 0.1%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-3 |
0.01%Vallisneria natans | Y3-4 | 0.01%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-4 |
10%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-1 | 10%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-1 |
1%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-2 | 1%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-2 |
0.1%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-3 | 0.1%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-3 |
0.01%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-4 | 0.01%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-4 |
10%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-1 | 10%毒参Hemlock | Y13-1 |
1%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-2 | 1%毒参Hemlock | Y13-2 |
0.1%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-3 | 0.1%毒参Hemlock | Y13-3 |
0.01%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-4 | 0.01%毒参Hemlock | Y13-4 |
10%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-1 | 10%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-1 |
1%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-2 | 1%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-2 |
0.1%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-3 | 0.1%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-3 |
0.01%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-4 | 0.01%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-4 |
10%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-1 | 10%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-1 |
1%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-2 | 1%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-2 |
0.1%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-3 | 0.1%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-3 |
0.01%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-4 | 0.01%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-4 |
10%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-1 | 10%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-1 |
1%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-2 | 1%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-2 |
0.1%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-3 | 0.1%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-3 |
0.01%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-4 | 0.01%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-4 |
表2 供试植物提取物配制浓度及编号
Table 2 Preparation concentration and number of tested plant extracts
处理Treatment | 编号Number | 处理Treatment | 编号Number |
---|---|---|---|
10%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-1 | 10%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-1 |
1%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-2 | 1%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-2 |
0.1%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-3 | 0.1%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-3 |
0.01%苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | Y1-4 | 0.01%小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | Y5-4 |
10%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-1 | 10%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-1 |
1%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-2 | 1%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-2 |
0.1%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-3 | 0.1%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-3 |
0.01%孜然Cuminum cyminum | Y2-4 | 0.01%骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | Y6-4 |
10%苦草Vallisneria natans | Y3-1 | 10%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-1 |
1%苦草Vallisneria natans | Y3-2 | 1%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-2 |
0.1%苦草Vallisneria natans | Y3-3 | 0.1%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-3 |
0.01%Vallisneria natans | Y3-4 | 0.01%大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | Y7-4 |
10%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-1 | 10%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-1 |
1%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-2 | 1%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-2 |
0.1%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-3 | 0.1%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-3 |
0.01%曼陀罗Datura metelL | Y4-4 | 0.01%黄芪Astragali Radix | Y8-4 |
10%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-1 | 10%毒参Hemlock | Y13-1 |
1%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-2 | 1%毒参Hemlock | Y13-2 |
0.1%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-3 | 0.1%毒参Hemlock | Y13-3 |
0.01%黄芩Astragali Radix | Y9-4 | 0.01%毒参Hemlock | Y13-4 |
10%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-1 | 10%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-1 |
1%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-2 | 1%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-2 |
0.1%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-3 | 0.1%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-3 |
0.01%牛至Organum vulgare | Y10-4 | 0.01%金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | Y14-4 |
10%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-1 | 10%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-1 |
1%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-2 | 1%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-2 |
0.1%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-3 | 0.1%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-3 |
0.01%灰绿藜Chenopodium glaucum | Y11-4 | 0.01%猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | Y15-4 |
10%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-1 | 10%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-1 |
1%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-2 | 1%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-2 |
0.1%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-3 | 0.1%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-3 |
0.01%线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | Y12-4 | 0.01%沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | Y16-4 |
种名 Species | 提取率 Extraction rate(%) |
---|---|
灰绿藜Oakleaf Goosefoot | 15.21 |
曼陀罗Datura metelL | 11.30 |
线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | 13.76 |
猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | 15.40 |
苦草Vallisneria natans | 26.20 |
沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | 14.37 |
金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | 12.29 |
大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | 19.45 |
黄芩Scutellariabaicalensis | 18.13 |
牛至Organum vulgare | 21.14 |
小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | 15.80 |
毒参Hemlock | 19.70 |
孜然Cuminum cyminum | 12.87 |
苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | 12.61 |
骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | 6.11 |
黄芪Astragali Radix | 17.00 |
表3 16种植物甲醇提取物的提取率
Table 3 Extraction rates of 16 plant methanol extracts
种名 Species | 提取率 Extraction rate(%) |
---|---|
灰绿藜Oakleaf Goosefoot | 15.21 |
曼陀罗Datura metelL | 11.30 |
线柏Chamaecyparis pisifera | 13.76 |
猪毛草Scirpus wallichii | 15.40 |
苦草Vallisneria natans | 26.20 |
沙枣Elaeagnus angustifolia | 14.37 |
金合欢Acacia dyepanolobium | 12.29 |
大戟Euphorbia pekinensis | 19.45 |
黄芩Scutellariabaicalensis | 18.13 |
牛至Organum vulgare | 21.14 |
小果白刺Nitraria sibirica | 15.80 |
毒参Hemlock | 19.70 |
孜然Cuminum cyminum | 12.87 |
苦豆子Sophra alopecuroides | 12.61 |
骆驼刺Alhagi sparsifoli | 6.11 |
黄芪Astragali Radix | 17.00 |
处理 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination potential (%) | 发芽率 Germination rate (%) | 苗高 Shoot height | 根长 Root length | 根数 Root number | 储藏物质 转运率 Storage transport rate(%) | 综合评价值D D value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 82.7bcd | 89.0bc | 7.8bc | 6.4bc | 5.4bc | 25.1bc | 0.65 |
Y1-1 | 50.7g | 71.0ef | 5.3d | 5.4d | 4.8cd | 15.9e | 0.40 |
Y1-2 | 81.3bc | 89.0bc | 6.3cd | 6.3bc | 5.4bc | 20.6d | 0.57 |
Y1-3 | 84.0bc | 89.0bc | 8.7ab | 7.0bc | 6.0c | 27.3b | 0.71 |
Y1-4 | 91.0a | 95.0a | 9.2a | 7.9a | 6.4a | 30.2a | 0.93 |
Y2-1 | 12.7ef | 24.0g | 4.4de | 4.3de | 4.6cd | 12.8e | 0.14 |
Y2-2 | 82.7bc | 89.0bc | 6.5cd | 6.7bc | 5.4bc | 24.1bc | 0.62 |
Y2-3 | 84.0bc | 86.0cd | 8.8ab | 6.3b | 4.9cd | 31.8a | 0.63 |
Y2-4 | 89.0a | 92.0a | 8.9a | 7.6ab | 6.5a | 23.8d | 0.86 |
Y3-1 | 70.0de | 84.0cd | 7.1bc | 7.3ab | 6.3ab | 20.8d | 0.67 |
Y3-2 | 83.0bcd | 89.0bc | 10.6a | 6.8bc | 6.3ab | 25.8bc | 0.80 |
Y3-3 | 84.0bc | 87.0bc | 8.1ab | 7.0bc | 6.3ab | 33.6a | 0.73 |
Y3-4 | 90.0a | 93.0a | 9.1a | 7.8ab | 5.9bc | 27.7ab | 0.77 |
Y4-1 | 84.6bc | 88.2bc | 7.9bc | 6.7bc | 6.3ab | 22.8cd | 0.71 |
Y4-2 | 83.0bcd | 89.4ab | 7.3bc | 6.8bc | 5.8bc | 21.3d | 0.67 |
Y4-3 | 86.0ab | 88.2bc | 7.5bc | 5.4cd | 6.2ab | 23.3cd | 0.61 |
Y4-4 | 86.0ab | 88.8bc | 7.9bc | 5.7cd | 5.9bc | 27.7ab | 0.65 |
Y5-1 | 75.0de | 70.0ef | 5.4d | 5.0cd | 4.1d | 15.3e | 0.41 |
Y5-2 | 82.8bc | 75.3de | 6.0cd | 5.2cd | 5.0c | 26.6b | 0.46 |
Y5-3 | 85.2bc | 88.7bc | 6.4cd | 4.7de | 4.6cd | 18.8de | 0.49 |
Y5-4 | 84.0bc | 87.0bc | 7.8bc | 6.5bc | 5.5bc | 26.8b | 0.58 |
Y6-1 | 74.4de | 68.7ef | 5.4d | 5.9cd | 3.7de | 20.7d | 0.38 |
处理 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination potential (%) | 发芽率 Germination rate (%) | 苗高 Shoot height | 根长 Root length | 根数 Root number | 储藏物质 转运率 Storage transport rate(%) | 综合评价值D D value |
Y6-2 | 79.2cd | 80.0de | 6.6cd | 5.6cd | 5.0c | 26.3bc | 0.53 |
Y6-3 | 78.6bc | 84.7cd | 7.6bc | 5.6cd | 4.9cd | 26.6b | 0.55 |
Y6-4 | 75.0cd | 81.3cd | 5.7d | 6.3bc | 4.8cd | 25.9bc | 0.46 |
Y7-1 | 45.0ef | 66.0ef | 6.2cd | 5.9cd | 5.4bc | 22.4d | 0.45 |
Y7-2 | 61.2ef | 79.3de | 7.6bc | 6.7bc | 6.2ab | 27.5b | 0.57 |
Y7-3 | 70.8de | 80.0de | 6.4cd | 6.8bc | 5.8bc | 27.2b | 0.55 |
Y7-4 | 86.0ab | 89.3ab | 8.7ab | 6.7bc | 6.0b | 26.8bc | 0.70 |
Y8-1 | 59.4ef | 80.0de | 6.0cd | 6.0c | 5.5bc | 29.7ab | 0.52 |
Y8-2 | 68.4de | 86.0cd | 7.6bc | 6.4bc | 5.8bc | 28.3ab | 0.62 |
Y8-3 | 69.0de | 86.3bc | 7.1bc | 6.7bc | 6.0b | 26.1bc | 0.63 |
Y9-1 | 61.8ef | 87.3bc | 7.3bc | 6.6bc | 5.8bc | 26.5bc | 0.62 |
Y9-2 | 81.0bc | 88.9bc | 7.6bc | 6.6bc | 5.9c | 23.4cd | 0.68 |
Y9-3 | 81.0bc | 87.6bc | 7.8bc | 7.1ab | 6.1b | 27.9ab | 0.63 |
Y9-4 | 79.8cd | 84.9cd | 7.6bc | 6.8bc | 5.6bc | 26.9bc | 0.60 |
Y10-1 | 74.4de | 87.3bc | 5.4d | 7.3ab | 5.4bc | 20.1d | 0.58 |
Y10-2 | 78.6cd | 87.7bc | 6.7cd | 7.0bc | 5.8bc | 25.5bc | 0.53 |
Y10-3 | 81.6bc | 89.3ab | 7.7bc | 5.4d | 5.9bc | 26.3bc | 0.56 |
Y10-4 | 77.4cd | 86.3bc | 7.1c | 6.8bc | 5.5bc | 24.9bc | 0.54 |
Y11-1 | 57.6ef | 77.3de | 7.3bc | 6.6bc | 5.6bc | 23.1cd | 0.46 |
Y11-2 | 78.0cd | 89.3ab | 7.9bc | 5.8cd | 5.5bc | 27.3b | 0.56 |
Y11-3 | 79.8cd | 88.7bc | 8.0ab | 6.5bc | 5.5bc | 23.5cd | 0.59 |
Y11-4 | 85.6bc | 87.4bc | 8.4ab | 6.8bc | 5.7bc | 27.4b | 0.45 |
Y12-1 | 53.4ef | 62.1ef | 4.3de | 5.5cd | 5.6bc | 21.5d | 0.42 |
Y12-2 | 72.0de | 81.1cd | 7.5bc | 6.0c | 5.6bc | 23.8bc | 0.50 |
Y12-3 | 76.8de | 86.8bc | 8.3ab | 4.9de | 6.0c | 28.4ab | 0.53 |
Y12-4 | 82.2bc | 90.3ab | 8.6ab | 5.7cd | 5.4bc | 28.1ab | 0.46 |
Y13-1 | 55.8ef | 59.5ef | 5.8d | 6.6bc | 4.3cd | 21.6d | 0.43 |
Y13-2 | 77.4cd | 79.8de | 7.4bc | 6.4bc | 5.7bc | 29.6ab | 0.52 |
Y13-3 | 75.6de | 88.0bc | 8.2ab | 5.1de | 6.1b | 29.2ab | 0.54 |
Y13-4 | 78.0cd | 88.0bc | 7.3bc | 6.7bc | 5.5bc | 28.6ab | 0.45 |
Y14-1 | 76.0cd | 66.0ef | 6.3cd | 5.2de | 5.1c | 22.6c | 0.47 |
Y14-2 | 78.0cd | 88.0bc | 8.3ab | 5.3d | 5.7bc | 28.1ab | 0.53 |
Y14-3 | 81.6de | 89.3ab | 8.0ab | 6.2bc | 5.2c | 26.0b | 0.58 |
Y14-4 | 79.2bc | 87.3bc | 8.0ab | 6.6bc | 5.7bc | 28.5ab | 0.52 |
Y15-1 | 57.0ef | 75.3de | 5.7d | 6.6bc | 5.7bc | 20.4d | 0.52 |
Y15-2 | 79.2cd | 86.8bc | 8.1ab | 6.7bc | 6.0b | 27.6ab | 0.54 |
Y15-3 | 78.6cd | 88.7bc | 8.1ab | 5.8cd | 5.7bc | 29.4ab | 0.58 |
Y15-4 | 82.8bc | 85.5cd | 8.0ab | 6.7bc | 5.7bc | 27.2b | 0.49 |
Y16-1 | 64.2de | 72.8ef | 5.3d | 6.6bc | 5.4bc | 20.4d | 0.46 |
Y16-2 | 83.4bc | 88.1bc | 6.9cd | 6.2bc | 5.6bc | 27.5b | 0.56 |
Y16-3 | 80.4bc | 88.1bc | 7.8bc | 6.0c | 5.8bc | 29.1ab | 0.55 |
Y16-4 | 82.8bc | 88.8bc | 7.3bc | 6.7bc | 5.5bc | 25.2bc | 0.66 |
表4 小麦种子萌发指标的比较
Table 4 Comparison of seed germination indexes in wheat
处理 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination potential (%) | 发芽率 Germination rate (%) | 苗高 Shoot height | 根长 Root length | 根数 Root number | 储藏物质 转运率 Storage transport rate(%) | 综合评价值D D value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 82.7bcd | 89.0bc | 7.8bc | 6.4bc | 5.4bc | 25.1bc | 0.65 |
Y1-1 | 50.7g | 71.0ef | 5.3d | 5.4d | 4.8cd | 15.9e | 0.40 |
Y1-2 | 81.3bc | 89.0bc | 6.3cd | 6.3bc | 5.4bc | 20.6d | 0.57 |
Y1-3 | 84.0bc | 89.0bc | 8.7ab | 7.0bc | 6.0c | 27.3b | 0.71 |
Y1-4 | 91.0a | 95.0a | 9.2a | 7.9a | 6.4a | 30.2a | 0.93 |
Y2-1 | 12.7ef | 24.0g | 4.4de | 4.3de | 4.6cd | 12.8e | 0.14 |
Y2-2 | 82.7bc | 89.0bc | 6.5cd | 6.7bc | 5.4bc | 24.1bc | 0.62 |
Y2-3 | 84.0bc | 86.0cd | 8.8ab | 6.3b | 4.9cd | 31.8a | 0.63 |
Y2-4 | 89.0a | 92.0a | 8.9a | 7.6ab | 6.5a | 23.8d | 0.86 |
Y3-1 | 70.0de | 84.0cd | 7.1bc | 7.3ab | 6.3ab | 20.8d | 0.67 |
Y3-2 | 83.0bcd | 89.0bc | 10.6a | 6.8bc | 6.3ab | 25.8bc | 0.80 |
Y3-3 | 84.0bc | 87.0bc | 8.1ab | 7.0bc | 6.3ab | 33.6a | 0.73 |
Y3-4 | 90.0a | 93.0a | 9.1a | 7.8ab | 5.9bc | 27.7ab | 0.77 |
Y4-1 | 84.6bc | 88.2bc | 7.9bc | 6.7bc | 6.3ab | 22.8cd | 0.71 |
Y4-2 | 83.0bcd | 89.4ab | 7.3bc | 6.8bc | 5.8bc | 21.3d | 0.67 |
Y4-3 | 86.0ab | 88.2bc | 7.5bc | 5.4cd | 6.2ab | 23.3cd | 0.61 |
Y4-4 | 86.0ab | 88.8bc | 7.9bc | 5.7cd | 5.9bc | 27.7ab | 0.65 |
Y5-1 | 75.0de | 70.0ef | 5.4d | 5.0cd | 4.1d | 15.3e | 0.41 |
Y5-2 | 82.8bc | 75.3de | 6.0cd | 5.2cd | 5.0c | 26.6b | 0.46 |
Y5-3 | 85.2bc | 88.7bc | 6.4cd | 4.7de | 4.6cd | 18.8de | 0.49 |
Y5-4 | 84.0bc | 87.0bc | 7.8bc | 6.5bc | 5.5bc | 26.8b | 0.58 |
Y6-1 | 74.4de | 68.7ef | 5.4d | 5.9cd | 3.7de | 20.7d | 0.38 |
处理 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination potential (%) | 发芽率 Germination rate (%) | 苗高 Shoot height | 根长 Root length | 根数 Root number | 储藏物质 转运率 Storage transport rate(%) | 综合评价值D D value |
Y6-2 | 79.2cd | 80.0de | 6.6cd | 5.6cd | 5.0c | 26.3bc | 0.53 |
Y6-3 | 78.6bc | 84.7cd | 7.6bc | 5.6cd | 4.9cd | 26.6b | 0.55 |
Y6-4 | 75.0cd | 81.3cd | 5.7d | 6.3bc | 4.8cd | 25.9bc | 0.46 |
Y7-1 | 45.0ef | 66.0ef | 6.2cd | 5.9cd | 5.4bc | 22.4d | 0.45 |
Y7-2 | 61.2ef | 79.3de | 7.6bc | 6.7bc | 6.2ab | 27.5b | 0.57 |
Y7-3 | 70.8de | 80.0de | 6.4cd | 6.8bc | 5.8bc | 27.2b | 0.55 |
Y7-4 | 86.0ab | 89.3ab | 8.7ab | 6.7bc | 6.0b | 26.8bc | 0.70 |
Y8-1 | 59.4ef | 80.0de | 6.0cd | 6.0c | 5.5bc | 29.7ab | 0.52 |
Y8-2 | 68.4de | 86.0cd | 7.6bc | 6.4bc | 5.8bc | 28.3ab | 0.62 |
Y8-3 | 69.0de | 86.3bc | 7.1bc | 6.7bc | 6.0b | 26.1bc | 0.63 |
Y9-1 | 61.8ef | 87.3bc | 7.3bc | 6.6bc | 5.8bc | 26.5bc | 0.62 |
Y9-2 | 81.0bc | 88.9bc | 7.6bc | 6.6bc | 5.9c | 23.4cd | 0.68 |
Y9-3 | 81.0bc | 87.6bc | 7.8bc | 7.1ab | 6.1b | 27.9ab | 0.63 |
Y9-4 | 79.8cd | 84.9cd | 7.6bc | 6.8bc | 5.6bc | 26.9bc | 0.60 |
Y10-1 | 74.4de | 87.3bc | 5.4d | 7.3ab | 5.4bc | 20.1d | 0.58 |
Y10-2 | 78.6cd | 87.7bc | 6.7cd | 7.0bc | 5.8bc | 25.5bc | 0.53 |
Y10-3 | 81.6bc | 89.3ab | 7.7bc | 5.4d | 5.9bc | 26.3bc | 0.56 |
Y10-4 | 77.4cd | 86.3bc | 7.1c | 6.8bc | 5.5bc | 24.9bc | 0.54 |
Y11-1 | 57.6ef | 77.3de | 7.3bc | 6.6bc | 5.6bc | 23.1cd | 0.46 |
Y11-2 | 78.0cd | 89.3ab | 7.9bc | 5.8cd | 5.5bc | 27.3b | 0.56 |
Y11-3 | 79.8cd | 88.7bc | 8.0ab | 6.5bc | 5.5bc | 23.5cd | 0.59 |
Y11-4 | 85.6bc | 87.4bc | 8.4ab | 6.8bc | 5.7bc | 27.4b | 0.45 |
Y12-1 | 53.4ef | 62.1ef | 4.3de | 5.5cd | 5.6bc | 21.5d | 0.42 |
Y12-2 | 72.0de | 81.1cd | 7.5bc | 6.0c | 5.6bc | 23.8bc | 0.50 |
Y12-3 | 76.8de | 86.8bc | 8.3ab | 4.9de | 6.0c | 28.4ab | 0.53 |
Y12-4 | 82.2bc | 90.3ab | 8.6ab | 5.7cd | 5.4bc | 28.1ab | 0.46 |
Y13-1 | 55.8ef | 59.5ef | 5.8d | 6.6bc | 4.3cd | 21.6d | 0.43 |
Y13-2 | 77.4cd | 79.8de | 7.4bc | 6.4bc | 5.7bc | 29.6ab | 0.52 |
Y13-3 | 75.6de | 88.0bc | 8.2ab | 5.1de | 6.1b | 29.2ab | 0.54 |
Y13-4 | 78.0cd | 88.0bc | 7.3bc | 6.7bc | 5.5bc | 28.6ab | 0.45 |
Y14-1 | 76.0cd | 66.0ef | 6.3cd | 5.2de | 5.1c | 22.6c | 0.47 |
Y14-2 | 78.0cd | 88.0bc | 8.3ab | 5.3d | 5.7bc | 28.1ab | 0.53 |
Y14-3 | 81.6de | 89.3ab | 8.0ab | 6.2bc | 5.2c | 26.0b | 0.58 |
Y14-4 | 79.2bc | 87.3bc | 8.0ab | 6.6bc | 5.7bc | 28.5ab | 0.52 |
Y15-1 | 57.0ef | 75.3de | 5.7d | 6.6bc | 5.7bc | 20.4d | 0.52 |
Y15-2 | 79.2cd | 86.8bc | 8.1ab | 6.7bc | 6.0b | 27.6ab | 0.54 |
Y15-3 | 78.6cd | 88.7bc | 8.1ab | 5.8cd | 5.7bc | 29.4ab | 0.58 |
Y15-4 | 82.8bc | 85.5cd | 8.0ab | 6.7bc | 5.7bc | 27.2b | 0.49 |
Y16-1 | 64.2de | 72.8ef | 5.3d | 6.6bc | 5.4bc | 20.4d | 0.46 |
Y16-2 | 83.4bc | 88.1bc | 6.9cd | 6.2bc | 5.6bc | 27.5b | 0.56 |
Y16-3 | 80.4bc | 88.1bc | 7.8bc | 6.0c | 5.8bc | 29.1ab | 0.55 |
Y16-4 | 82.8bc | 88.8bc | 7.3bc | 6.7bc | 5.5bc | 25.2bc | 0.66 |
图1 小麦幼苗形态特征指标的比较 注:图中短线表示标准差,不同小写字母表示处理间在P<0.05水平上差异显著。CK:蒸馏水作为对照;Y1-3:0.1%苦豆子甲醇提取物;Y1-4:0.01%苦豆子甲醇提取物;Y2-4:0.01%孜然甲醇提取物;Y3-2:1%苦草甲醇提取物;Y3-3:0.1%苦草甲醇提取物;Y3-4:0.01%苦草甲醇提取物;Y4-1:10%曼陀罗甲醇提取物;Y7-4:0.01%大戟甲醇提取物,下同
Fig.1 Comparison of morphological characteristics of wheat seedlings Note: The bar is mean standard deviation.Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference among treatments at P < 0.05.CK: water as a control group; Y1-3: 0.1% methanol extraction from Sophra alopecuroides; Y1-4: 0.01% methanol extraction from Sophra alopecuroides; Y2-4: 0.01% methanol extraction from Cuminum cyminum; Y3-2: 1% methanol extraction from Vallisneria natans; Y3-3: 0.1% methanol extraction from Vallisneria natans; Y3-4: 0.01% methanol extraction from Vallisneria natans; Y4-1: 0.01% methanol extraction from Datura mete; Y7-4: 0.1% methanol extraction from Euphorbia pekinensis,the same as below
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率Pn Net photosyn thesis rate Pn (μmol/(m2·S)) | 蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate Tr (mmol/(m2·S)) | 气孔导度Gs Stomatal conductance Gs (mol/(m2·S)) | 胞间CO2浓度Ci Intercellular CO2 concentration Ci (μmol/mol) | 气孔限制值 Stomatal limiation | SPAD值 SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.51±0.71b | 2.12±0.28a | 0.11±0.01ab | 300.01±15.23ab | 0.41a | 38.65±2.48b |
Y1-3 | 5.50±0.73c | 2.30±0.28a | 0.09±0.02b | 285.03±15.48c | 0.42a | 40.25±2.31ab |
Y1-4 | 7.82±0.68a | 2.23±0.31a | 0.11±0.01ab | 312.24±14.69a | 0.41a | 41.08±2.34a |
Y2-4 | 6.92±0.74a | 2.30±0.29a | 0.13±0.03ab | 294.62±15.46b | 0.37a | 40.57±2.48ab |
Y3-2 | 6.27±0.72b | 2.50±0.34a | 0.15±0.01a | 289.45±16.35bc | 0.38a | 38.70±3.64ab |
Y3-3 | 6.22±0.81b | 2.34±0.31a | 0.08±0.03b | 286.53±15.21bc | 0.39a | 35.70±2.74c |
Y3-4 | 6.93±0.74a | 2.40±0.32a | 0.12±0.04a | 298.63±14.86b | 0.42a | 40.00±2.54ab |
Y4-1 | 6.41±0.73b | 2.65±0.33a | 0.11±0.01ab | 295.63±15.36b | 0.43a | 35.86±3.80b |
Y7-4 | 6.31±0.73b | 2.70±0.31a | 0.13±0.02a | 307.56±16.35a | 0.41a | 39.20±3.85ab |
表5 小麦幼苗叶片光合特性的比较
Table 5 Comparison of leaf photosynthetic characteristics of seedlings in wheat
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率Pn Net photosyn thesis rate Pn (μmol/(m2·S)) | 蒸腾速率Tr Transpiration rate Tr (mmol/(m2·S)) | 气孔导度Gs Stomatal conductance Gs (mol/(m2·S)) | 胞间CO2浓度Ci Intercellular CO2 concentration Ci (μmol/mol) | 气孔限制值 Stomatal limiation | SPAD值 SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.51±0.71b | 2.12±0.28a | 0.11±0.01ab | 300.01±15.23ab | 0.41a | 38.65±2.48b |
Y1-3 | 5.50±0.73c | 2.30±0.28a | 0.09±0.02b | 285.03±15.48c | 0.42a | 40.25±2.31ab |
Y1-4 | 7.82±0.68a | 2.23±0.31a | 0.11±0.01ab | 312.24±14.69a | 0.41a | 41.08±2.34a |
Y2-4 | 6.92±0.74a | 2.30±0.29a | 0.13±0.03ab | 294.62±15.46b | 0.37a | 40.57±2.48ab |
Y3-2 | 6.27±0.72b | 2.50±0.34a | 0.15±0.01a | 289.45±16.35bc | 0.38a | 38.70±3.64ab |
Y3-3 | 6.22±0.81b | 2.34±0.31a | 0.08±0.03b | 286.53±15.21bc | 0.39a | 35.70±2.74c |
Y3-4 | 6.93±0.74a | 2.40±0.32a | 0.12±0.04a | 298.63±14.86b | 0.42a | 40.00±2.54ab |
Y4-1 | 6.41±0.73b | 2.65±0.33a | 0.11±0.01ab | 295.63±15.36b | 0.43a | 35.86±3.80b |
Y7-4 | 6.31±0.73b | 2.70±0.31a | 0.13±0.02a | 307.56±16.35a | 0.41a | 39.20±3.85ab |
处理 Treat- ment | 因子Factor | F1 | F2 | F | 排序 Order | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | |||||
CK | -0.07 | -0.47 | -0.15 | -0.57 | -0.25 | 5 |
Y1-3 | 0.39 | -1.61 | 0.85 | -1.93 | 0.20 | 4 |
Y1-4 | 1.25 | 2.05 | 2.72 | 2.47 | 2.66 | 1 |
Y2-4 | 1.03 | 0.01 | 2.25 | 0.02 | 1.74 | 3 |
Y3-2 | -1.22 | 0.50 | -2.66 | 0.60 | -1.90 | 8 |
Y3-3 | -1.28 | -0.06 | -2.80 | -0.07 | -2.17 | 9 |
Y3-4 | 1.12 | 0.49 | 2.45 | 0.59 | 2.02 | 2 |
Y4-1 | -0.39 | -0.64 | -0.85 | -0.77 | -0.83 | 6 |
Y7-4 | -0.83 | -0.27 | -1.82 | -0.32 | -1.47 | 7 |
表6 主成分比较
Table 6 Comparison of principal component
处理 Treat- ment | 因子Factor | F1 | F2 | F | 排序 Order | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | |||||
CK | -0.07 | -0.47 | -0.15 | -0.57 | -0.25 | 5 |
Y1-3 | 0.39 | -1.61 | 0.85 | -1.93 | 0.20 | 4 |
Y1-4 | 1.25 | 2.05 | 2.72 | 2.47 | 2.66 | 1 |
Y2-4 | 1.03 | 0.01 | 2.25 | 0.02 | 1.74 | 3 |
Y3-2 | -1.22 | 0.50 | -2.66 | 0.60 | -1.90 | 8 |
Y3-3 | -1.28 | -0.06 | -2.80 | -0.07 | -2.17 | 9 |
Y3-4 | 1.12 | 0.49 | 2.45 | 0.59 | 2.02 | 2 |
Y4-1 | -0.39 | -0.64 | -0.85 | -0.77 | -0.83 | 6 |
Y7-4 | -0.83 | -0.27 | -1.82 | -0.32 | -1.47 | 7 |
[1] | 卢寅轩. 森林病虫害防治与林业生态环境建设[J]. 农家参谋, 2021,(24): 157-158. |
LU Yinxuan. Forest pest control and forestry ecological environment construction[J]. The Farmers Consultant, 2021,(24): 157-158. | |
[2] | 毛亮, 张以和, 潘卫萍. 吐鲁番市绿色植保工作思路探讨[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(3): 92-95. |
MAO Liang, ZHANG Yihe, PAN Weiping. Discussion on the working ideas of green plant protection in Turpan[J]. China Plant Protection, 2021, 41 (3): 92-95. | |
[3] | 张兴, 马志卿, 冯俊涛, 等. 植物源农药研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(5): 685-698. |
ZHANG Xing, MA Zhiqing, FENG Juntao, et al. Research progress on pesticides of plant origin[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2015, 31(5): 685-698. | |
[4] | 陈自强, 韦春蕾, 喻子薇, 等. 基于国内外药典记载的植物提取物研究现状与思考[J]. 中药材, 2021, 44(9): 2247-2251. |
CHEN Zhiqiang, WEI Chunlei, YU Ziwei, et al. Research status and reflections on plant extracts based on pharmacopoeia records at home and abroad[J]. Zhongyaocai, 2021, 44(9): 2247-2251. | |
[5] | 操海群, 岳永德, 化日茂. 植物农药研究与开发进展[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2000, 27(1): 40-44. |
CAO Haiqun, YUE Yongde, HUA Rimao. Research and development progress of plant pesticides[J]. Journal of Anhui Pesticide University, 2000, 27 (1): 40-44. | |
[6] | 于忻滢, 张国良, 范松. 植物源农药研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021,(7): 123-129. |
YU Xinying, ZHANG Guoliang, FAN Song. Research progress of botanical pesticides[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021,(7): 123-129. | |
[7] |
Geiger Michaela. Synergie zwischen priesterlichem und g ttlichem Handeln im Aaronitischen Segen (Num 6, 22-27)[J]. Vetus Testamentum, 2018, 68(1):51-72.
DOI URL |
[8] | 杨从军. 番茄茎叶水提取液对7种蔬菜的化感作用[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 36(2): 91-94. |
YANG Congjun. Allelopathic effects of tomato stem and leaf aqueous extract on seven vegetables[J]. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2019, 36(2): 91-94. | |
[9] | 刘建新. 骆驼蓬提取物浸种对小麦幼苗生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(9):1756-1760. |
LIU Jianxin. Effect of camel poncho extract immersion on wheat seedling growth and antioxidant enzyme activity[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2005, 25 (9): 1756-1760. | |
[10] | Khan S M A, Basra M,. Nawaz I. et al. Combined application of moringa leaf extract and chemical growth-promoters enhances the plant growth and productivity of wheat crop[J]. South African Journal of Botany, 2020,129. |
[11] |
Teixeira S B, Pires S N, Vila G E, et al. Application of vigor indexes to evaluate the cold tolerance in rice seeds germination conditioned in plant extract[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1):11,038-11,038.
DOI URL |
[12] | 郭小强. 苦豆子种子提取物对小麦幼苗生长的影响[J]. 甘肃农业, 2012, (9): 70-71. |
GUO Xiaoqiang. Effects ofSophraalopecuroides seed extract on wheat seedling growth[J]. Gansu Agriculture, 2012,(9): 70-71. | |
[13] | 张婷婷, 赵宾, 杨丽明. 基于电子鼻技术的小麦种子活力鉴别[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(9): 123-130. |
ZHANG Tingting, ZHAO Bin, YANG Liming. Identification of wheat seed viability based on electronic nose technology[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018, 23(9): 123-130. | |
[14] | 赵慧. 植物生长调节剂对小麦、麦长管蚜和烟蚜茧蜂的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014. |
ZHAO Hui. Effects of plant growth regulators on wheat, wheat tube aphid and smoke aphid cocoon bee[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2014. | |
[15] |
张玉琼, 仲延龙, 高翠云, 等. 高效液相色谱法分离和测定小麦中的5种内源激素[J]. 色谱, 2013, 31(8): 800-803.
DOI |
ZHANG Yuqiong, ZHONG Yanlong, GAO Cuiyun, et al. Isolation and determination of five endogenous hormones in Wheat by high performance liquid chromatography[J]. Chromatography, 2013, 31(8): 800-803. | |
[16] | 吕丽荣. 茶多酚对盐处理下小麦幼苗叶片光合特性及抗氧化反应的影响[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2018. |
LV Lirong. Effects of tea polyphenols on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant reactions of wheat seedlings under salt treatment[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2018. | |
[17] | 薛香. 小麦叶片叶绿素含量测定及其与SPAD值的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(11):2701-2702. |
XUE Xiang. Determination of chlorophyll content in Wheat leaves and its relationship with SPAD Value[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 49(11): 2701-2702. | |
[18] | 尹佳, 黄志鸿, 李继锋. 响应面优化超声波辅助提取葡萄籽油脂的工艺研究[J]. 中国调味品, 2020, 45(7):134-137. |
YIN Jia, HUANG Zhihong, LI Jifeng. Research on the process of ultrasonically assisted extraction of grape seed oil and fat with response surface optimization[J]. China Condiments, 2020, 45(7): 134-137. | |
[19] | 乔孟, 屈晓清, 丁之恩. 响应面法优化超声波辅助提取湖北海棠叶中总黄酮工艺[J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(2): 143-147. |
QIAO Meng, QU Xiaoqing, DING Zhien. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction process for total flavonoids from Malushupehensis leaves by response surface methodology[J]. Food Science, 2013, 34(2): 143-147. | |
[20] |
Zhang H B, Xie G Y, Tian M, et al. Optimization of the ultrasonic-assisted extraction of bioactive flavonoids from Ampelopsisgrossedentata and subsequent separation and purification of twoflavonoid aglycones by high-speed counter-current chromatography[J]. Molecules, 2016, 21(8): 1096.
DOI URL |
[21] | 陈建福, 彭敏. 芦柑叶总黄酮的提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(4): 117-122. |
CHEN Jianfu, PENG Min. Optimization of extraction technology of total flavonoids from ponkan leaves and its antioxidant activity[J]. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42(4): 117-122. | |
[22] | 韩溶溶. 药西瓜提取物对两种蔬菜害虫的生物活性及解毒代谢酶的影响[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2020. |
Han Rong. Effects of medicinal watermelon extract on biological activity and detoxification metabolic enzymes of two vegetable pests[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[23] | 司爱富. 植物提取物对萝卜蚜生物活性筛选及藜活性成分提取和追踪的研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2019. |
SI Aifu. Study on the screening of plant extracts on the biological activity of radish aphid and the extraction and tracking of quinoa active ingredients[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2019. | |
[24] | 张兴, 王兴林, 王胜宝, 等. 西北地区杀虫植物资源初步调查[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 1993, 28(1): 93-98. |
ZHANG Xing, WANG Xinglin, WANG Shengbao, et al. Preliminary investigation of insecticidal plant resources in Northwest China[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 1993, 28(1): 93-98. | |
[25] |
方涛, 张军高, 樊国全, 等. 28种植物提取物对棉蚜的杀虫活性测定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1868-1875.
DOI |
FANG Tao, ZHANG Jungao, FAN Guoquan, et al. Determination of insecticidal activity of 28 plant extracts on cotton aphid[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1868-1875.
DOI |
[1] | 李进, 沈煜洋, 邓菲菲, 陈江华, 孙婧婧, 李广阔, 高海峰. 新疆小麦有害生物发生现状及防控对策分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 122-126. |
[2] | 方辉, 丁银灯, 范贵强, 高永红, 黄天荣. 新疆南疆小麦产业发展的现状及品质特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[3] | 王春生, 李剑峰, 张跃强, 樊哲儒, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 张宏芝, 王立红, 夏建强, 王芳平, 赵奇. 新疆主栽春小麦品种花药培养力基因型差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2081-2086. |
[4] | 沈煜洋, 洪高洁, 范贵强, 陈利, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 杀虫剂减施和添加助剂对红枣-小麦间作麦田蚜虫防效的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2257-2268. |
[5] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
[6] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[7] | 袁莹莹, 赵经华, 迪力穆拉提·司马义, 杨庭瑞. 基于apriori算法对盆栽春小麦生理指标及产量的分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[8] | 袁以琳, 颜安, 左筱筱, 侯正清, 张振飞, 肖淑婷, 孙哲, 马梦倩, 赵宇航. 氮肥减量配施生物有机肥对春小麦增产及土壤培肥的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882. |
[9] | 刘旭欢, 于姗, 刘跃, 石书兵. 不同粒级春小麦种子活力差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887. |
[10] | 杨梅, 赵红梅, 迪丽热巴·夏米西丁, 杨卫君, 张金汕, 惠超. 氮肥减量配施生物质炭对春小麦群体结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
[11] | 杜云, 张婧婧, 雷嘉诚, 李博, 李永福. 冬小麦需水量的预测模型对比分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1590-1596. |
[12] | 强立栋, 冯宽, 朱长安, 赵云, 李召锋, 李卫华. 花后高温胁迫对小麦籽粒萌发及相关酶活性影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1345-1351. |
[13] | 王一钊, 杨其志, 刘玉秀, 阿拉依·努尔卡马力, Vladimir Shvidchenko, 张正茂. PEG胁迫下评价哈萨克斯坦不同春小麦种质苗期的抗旱性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360. |
[14] | 张宏芝, 王立红, 时佳, 孔德鹏, 王重, 高新, 李剑峰, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒, 张跃强. 土壤水分对不同抗旱性春小麦品种叶片保护性酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047. |
[15] | 王润琪, 贾永红, 王玉娇, 刘跃, 李丹丹, 董艳雪, 古力尼尕尔·吐尔洪, 张路路, 张金汕, 石书兵. 不同滴灌量对匀播冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1048-1056. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 53
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 230
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||