

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2694-2703.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.012
• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·土壤肥料 • 上一篇 下一篇
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜1(
), 张燕红1, 袁杰1, 赵志强1, 文孝荣2, 杜孝敬2, 王奉斌2, 吕玉平2, 阿曼古丽·艾孜子3(
)
收稿日期:2023-01-13
出版日期:2023-11-20
发布日期:2023-12-07
作者简介:布哈丽且木·阿不力孜(1974-),女,新疆喀什人,研究员,研究方向为水稻育种及栽培,(E-mail)1787237708@qq.com
基金资助:
Buhaliqiemu Abulizi1(
), ZHANG Yanhong1, YUAN Jie1, ZHAO Zhiqiang1, WEN Xiaorong2, DU Xiaojing2, WANG Fengbin2, LYU Yuping2, Amanguli Aizizi3(
)
Received:2023-01-13
Published:2023-11-20
Online:2023-12-07
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】 分析新疆不同香型水稻品种产量和品质性状,筛选出适合新疆稻区种植的优质丰产香型水稻品种。【方法】 以11份香型水稻品种为供试材料,测定不同香型水稻品种的产量及其构成因子和品质指标,利用相关性、主成分及聚类分析,综合评价不同香型水稻品种产量及品质性状的差异。【结果】 11份香型水稻品种产量和品质性状间存在不同程度差异,变异系数2.70%~69.19%,变异主要体现在穗粒数、垩白度和垩白率上。产量及品质性状间存在较多的相关关系,千粒重与粒长存在显著正相关,产量与垩白率、胶稠度呈显著正相关。综合得分新粳伊20号最高为2.565 9,新粳香53号最低为-2.022 6,当欧式距离为10时香型水稻品种被分为3类,第I类香型水稻品种占比63.64%,第Ⅱ类香型水稻品种占比27.27%,第Ⅲ类香型水稻品种是新粳伊20号,占比9.09%,第Ⅲ类香型水稻优质丰产性最好,第I类优质丰产性居中,第Ⅱ类最差。新粳伊20号优质丰产性最好。【结论】 香型水稻品种新粳伊20号优质丰产性最好,提高穗粒数、降低垩白率可以作为新疆香型水稻产量和品质改良的关键。
中图分类号:
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 张燕红, 袁杰, 赵志强, 文孝荣, 杜孝敬, 王奉斌, 吕玉平, 阿曼古丽·艾孜子. 新疆优质丰产香型水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703.
Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, ZHANG Yanhong, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Zhiqiang, WEN Xiaorong, DU Xiaojing, WANG Fengbin, LYU Yuping, Amanguli Aizizi. Screening and evaluation of aromatic rice varieties with high quality and high yield in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703.
| 品种 Variety | 有效穗数 (104穗/667m2) Effective panicles (104 panicle/667m2) | 穗粒数(粒) Kernels per panicle (kernel) | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/667m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新粳香53号Xinjingxiang 53 | 21.81h | 178.37a | 17.40k | 607.22f |
| 新粳香83号Xinjingxiang 83 | 30.65b | 83.26k | 23.42f | 580.52g |
| 新粳香2号Xinjingxiang 2 | 26.27d | 87.77j | 29.28a | 623.27de |
| 新粳香6号Xinjing xiang 6 | 33.33a | 89.24i | 21.40i | 620.39e |
| 新粳香8号Xinjingxiang 8 | 25.69e | 105.13g | 24.89c | 635.85c |
| 新粳香5号Xinjingxiang 5 | 21.73h | 114.79e | 24.34d | 556.94h |
| 新粳香1号Xinjingxiang 1 | 24.93g | 90.68f | 23.26g | 507.27i |
| 新稻50号Xindao 50 | 29.19c | 102.24h | 22.84h | 628.96d |
| 新粳8号Xinjing 8 | 26.23d | 116.50d | 23.51e | 671.16b |
| 新粳伊20号Xinjingyi 20 | 25.90e | 127.70b | 25.48b | 763.01a |
| 新粳伊3号Xinjingyi 3 | 25.26f | 122.70c | 21.08j | 627.86d |
表1 不同香型水稻品种稻米产量及构成因子
Tab.1 Yield and component factors of different aromatic rice varieties
| 品种 Variety | 有效穗数 (104穗/667m2) Effective panicles (104 panicle/667m2) | 穗粒数(粒) Kernels per panicle (kernel) | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/667m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新粳香53号Xinjingxiang 53 | 21.81h | 178.37a | 17.40k | 607.22f |
| 新粳香83号Xinjingxiang 83 | 30.65b | 83.26k | 23.42f | 580.52g |
| 新粳香2号Xinjingxiang 2 | 26.27d | 87.77j | 29.28a | 623.27de |
| 新粳香6号Xinjing xiang 6 | 33.33a | 89.24i | 21.40i | 620.39e |
| 新粳香8号Xinjingxiang 8 | 25.69e | 105.13g | 24.89c | 635.85c |
| 新粳香5号Xinjingxiang 5 | 21.73h | 114.79e | 24.34d | 556.94h |
| 新粳香1号Xinjingxiang 1 | 24.93g | 90.68f | 23.26g | 507.27i |
| 新稻50号Xindao 50 | 29.19c | 102.24h | 22.84h | 628.96d |
| 新粳8号Xinjing 8 | 26.23d | 116.50d | 23.51e | 671.16b |
| 新粳伊20号Xinjingyi 20 | 25.90e | 127.70b | 25.48b | 763.01a |
| 新粳伊3号Xinjingyi 3 | 25.26f | 122.70c | 21.08j | 627.86d |
| 品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpa rency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | 77.30g | 62.43h | 59.83e | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.76g | 14.87f | 75.67d | 4.57g | 1.87d | 1.00b |
| 新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | 81.10e | 70.43e | 67.70c | 0.10d | 1.00d | 11.59a | 16.67d | 73.67d | 6.47c | 2.70b | 1.00b |
| 新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | 82.60d | 71.67c | 62.73d | 0.10d | 1.00d | 8.67d | 18.13c | 74.33d | 7.70a | 3.20a | 1.00b |
| 新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 83.33c | 73.47b | 68.70b | 0.33b | 3.33b | 7.44h | 18.53b | 82.67b | 5.17f | 1.80de | 1.00b |
| 新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 85.40a | 75.67a | 68.87b | 0.33b | 2.00c | 7.97e | 15.47e | 81.33b | 4.57g | 1.60e | 1.67a |
| 新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | 79.90f | 65.73g | 54.80g | 0.20c | 1.00d | 9.35b | 18.63b | 75.67d | 6.77b | 3.10a | 1.00b |
| 新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | 81.17e | 67.23f | 53.30h | 0.20c | 2.00c | 8.83c | 19.30a | 66.33f | 6.30c | 2.57b | 1.67a |
| 新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 83.30c | 73.17b | 69.23a | 0.20c | 1.00d | 7.25i | 15.40e | 78.00c | 5.47e | 2.13c | 1.00b |
| 新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | 81.23e | 70.83d | 57.57f | 0.10d | 2.00c | 8.69d | 19.17a | 71.00e | 5.60e | 2.27c | 1.00b |
| 新粳伊20号 Xinjingyi 20 | 84.70b | 75.80a | 69.40a | 0.53a | 5.00a | 7.82fg | 19.40a | 87.00a | 5.57e | 2.20c | 1.00b |
| 新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 81.23e | 75.63a | 69.33a | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.89ef | 16.37d | 75.33d | 5.83d | 2.30c | 1.00b |
表2 不同香型水稻品种稻米品质性状指标
Tab.2 Rice quality traits of different aromatic rice varieties
| 品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpa rency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | 77.30g | 62.43h | 59.83e | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.76g | 14.87f | 75.67d | 4.57g | 1.87d | 1.00b |
| 新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | 81.10e | 70.43e | 67.70c | 0.10d | 1.00d | 11.59a | 16.67d | 73.67d | 6.47c | 2.70b | 1.00b |
| 新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | 82.60d | 71.67c | 62.73d | 0.10d | 1.00d | 8.67d | 18.13c | 74.33d | 7.70a | 3.20a | 1.00b |
| 新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 83.33c | 73.47b | 68.70b | 0.33b | 3.33b | 7.44h | 18.53b | 82.67b | 5.17f | 1.80de | 1.00b |
| 新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 85.40a | 75.67a | 68.87b | 0.33b | 2.00c | 7.97e | 15.47e | 81.33b | 4.57g | 1.60e | 1.67a |
| 新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | 79.90f | 65.73g | 54.80g | 0.20c | 1.00d | 9.35b | 18.63b | 75.67d | 6.77b | 3.10a | 1.00b |
| 新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | 81.17e | 67.23f | 53.30h | 0.20c | 2.00c | 8.83c | 19.30a | 66.33f | 6.30c | 2.57b | 1.67a |
| 新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 83.30c | 73.17b | 69.23a | 0.20c | 1.00d | 7.25i | 15.40e | 78.00c | 5.47e | 2.13c | 1.00b |
| 新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | 81.23e | 70.83d | 57.57f | 0.10d | 2.00c | 8.69d | 19.17a | 71.00e | 5.60e | 2.27c | 1.00b |
| 新粳伊20号 Xinjingyi 20 | 84.70b | 75.80a | 69.40a | 0.53a | 5.00a | 7.82fg | 19.40a | 87.00a | 5.57e | 2.20c | 1.00b |
| 新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 81.23e | 75.63a | 69.33a | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.89ef | 16.37d | 75.33d | 5.83d | 2.30c | 1.00b |
| 性状指标 Trait Index | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 平均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有效穗数(104穗/667m2) Effective panicles(104 panicle/667m2) | 21.57 | 33.41 | 26.45 | 3.37 | 12.74 |
| 穗粒数(粒)Kernels per panicle(kernel) | 83.25 | 178.50 | 110.76 | 26.17 | 23.63 |
| 千粒重1000-grain weight(g) | 17.30 | 29.36 | 23.36 | 2.87 | 12.29 |
| 产量Yield( kg/667m2) | 502.84 | 769.40 | 620.22 | 62.73 | 10.11 |
| 糙米率Brown rice rate(%) | 77.10 | 85.70 | 81.93 | 2.21 | 2.70 |
| 精米率Milled rice rate(%) | 62.10 | 76.10 | 71.10 | 4.26 | 6.00 |
| 整精米率Head rice rate(%) | 53.10 | 69.70 | 63.77 | 6.15 | 9.64 |
| 垩白度Chalky degree(%) | 0.10 | 0.60 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 66.67 |
| 垩白率Chalky rate(%) | 1.00 | 6.00 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 69.19 |
| 蛋白质含量Protein content(%) | 7.22 | 11.71 | 8.48 | 1.18 | 13.92 |
| 直链淀粉含量Amylose content(%) | 14.70 | 19.40 | 17.45 | 1.68 | 9.63 |
| 胶稠度Gel consistency(mm) | 65.00 | 88.10 | 76.45 | 5.61 | 7.34 |
| 粒长Grain length(mm) | 4.40 | 7.80 | 5.82 | 0.92 | 15.81 |
| 长宽比Aspect ratio | 1.60 | 3.30 | 2.34 | 0.51 | 21.79 |
| 透明度Transparency | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.12 | 0.33 | 29.46 |
表3 不同香型水稻品种产量与品质性状指标变异
Tab.3 Statistics on variation of yield and quality of different aromatic rice varieties
| 性状指标 Trait Index | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 平均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有效穗数(104穗/667m2) Effective panicles(104 panicle/667m2) | 21.57 | 33.41 | 26.45 | 3.37 | 12.74 |
| 穗粒数(粒)Kernels per panicle(kernel) | 83.25 | 178.50 | 110.76 | 26.17 | 23.63 |
| 千粒重1000-grain weight(g) | 17.30 | 29.36 | 23.36 | 2.87 | 12.29 |
| 产量Yield( kg/667m2) | 502.84 | 769.40 | 620.22 | 62.73 | 10.11 |
| 糙米率Brown rice rate(%) | 77.10 | 85.70 | 81.93 | 2.21 | 2.70 |
| 精米率Milled rice rate(%) | 62.10 | 76.10 | 71.10 | 4.26 | 6.00 |
| 整精米率Head rice rate(%) | 53.10 | 69.70 | 63.77 | 6.15 | 9.64 |
| 垩白度Chalky degree(%) | 0.10 | 0.60 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 66.67 |
| 垩白率Chalky rate(%) | 1.00 | 6.00 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 69.19 |
| 蛋白质含量Protein content(%) | 7.22 | 11.71 | 8.48 | 1.18 | 13.92 |
| 直链淀粉含量Amylose content(%) | 14.70 | 19.40 | 17.45 | 1.68 | 9.63 |
| 胶稠度Gel consistency(mm) | 65.00 | 88.10 | 76.45 | 5.61 | 7.34 |
| 粒长Grain length(mm) | 4.40 | 7.80 | 5.82 | 0.92 | 15.81 |
| 长宽比Aspect ratio | 1.60 | 3.30 | 2.34 | 0.51 | 21.79 |
| 透明度Transparency | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.12 | 0.33 | 29.46 |
| 相关性 Correlation | 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | 千粒重 1000- grain weight | 产量 Yield | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalky degree | 垩白率 Chalky rate | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 粒长 Grain length | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpar- ency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 1.000 | ||||||||||||||
| 穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | -0.644* | 1.000 | |||||||||||||
| 千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.076 | -0.609* | 1.000 | ||||||||||||
| 产量 Yield | 0.123 | 0.274 | 0.185 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
| 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 0.490 | -0.529 | 0.576 | 0.496 | 1.000 | ||||||||||
| 整精米率 Head rice rate | 0.588 | -0.135 | 0.018 | 0.560 | 0.613* | 1.000 | |||||||||
| 精米率 Milled rice rate | 0.518 | -0.410 | 0.392 | 0.598 | 0.869** | 0.785** | 1.000 | ||||||||
| 垩白度 Chalky degree | 0.169 | -0.038 | 0.208 | 0.538 | 0.687* | 0.379 | 0.477 | 1.000 | |||||||
| 垩白率 Chalky rate | 0.253 | -0.007 | 0.146 | 0.631* | 0.558 | 0.275 | 0.439 | 0.885** | 1.000 | ||||||
| 蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.062 | -0.375 | 0.230 | -0.400 | -0.276 | -0.251 | -0.279 | -0.379 | -0.320 | 1.000 | |||||
| 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.056 | -0.355 | 0.452 | 0.082 | 0.154 | -0.413 | 0.038 | 0.306 | 0.537 | 0.160 | 1.000 | ||||
| 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.260 | 0.151 | 0.064 | 0.712* | 0.583 | 0.716* | 0.548 | 0.781** | 0.629* | -0.449 | -0.108 | 1.000 | |||
| 粒长 Grain length | -0.041 | -0.522 | 0.662* | -0.308 | -0.096 | -0.326 | -0.109 | -0.334 | -0.290 | 0.535 | 0.469 | -0.421 | 1.000 | ||
| 长宽比 Aspect ratio | -0.224 | -0.351 | 0.557 | -0.352 | -0.273 | -0.461 | -0.291 | -0.389 | -0.364 | 0.587 | 0.430 | -0.471 | 0.967** | 1.000 | |
| 透明度 Transparency | -0.163 | -0.235 | 0.120 | -0.372 | 0.294 | -0.209 | 0.040 | 0.203 | 0.058 | -0.032 | -0.018 | -0.228 | -0.202 | -0.246 | 1.000 |
表4 不同香型水稻品种产量与品质性状的相关性
Tab.4 Correlation analysis of yield and quality traits among different aromatic rice varieties
| 相关性 Correlation | 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | 千粒重 1000- grain weight | 产量 Yield | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalky degree | 垩白率 Chalky rate | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 粒长 Grain length | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpar- ency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 1.000 | ||||||||||||||
| 穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | -0.644* | 1.000 | |||||||||||||
| 千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.076 | -0.609* | 1.000 | ||||||||||||
| 产量 Yield | 0.123 | 0.274 | 0.185 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
| 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 0.490 | -0.529 | 0.576 | 0.496 | 1.000 | ||||||||||
| 整精米率 Head rice rate | 0.588 | -0.135 | 0.018 | 0.560 | 0.613* | 1.000 | |||||||||
| 精米率 Milled rice rate | 0.518 | -0.410 | 0.392 | 0.598 | 0.869** | 0.785** | 1.000 | ||||||||
| 垩白度 Chalky degree | 0.169 | -0.038 | 0.208 | 0.538 | 0.687* | 0.379 | 0.477 | 1.000 | |||||||
| 垩白率 Chalky rate | 0.253 | -0.007 | 0.146 | 0.631* | 0.558 | 0.275 | 0.439 | 0.885** | 1.000 | ||||||
| 蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.062 | -0.375 | 0.230 | -0.400 | -0.276 | -0.251 | -0.279 | -0.379 | -0.320 | 1.000 | |||||
| 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.056 | -0.355 | 0.452 | 0.082 | 0.154 | -0.413 | 0.038 | 0.306 | 0.537 | 0.160 | 1.000 | ||||
| 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.260 | 0.151 | 0.064 | 0.712* | 0.583 | 0.716* | 0.548 | 0.781** | 0.629* | -0.449 | -0.108 | 1.000 | |||
| 粒长 Grain length | -0.041 | -0.522 | 0.662* | -0.308 | -0.096 | -0.326 | -0.109 | -0.334 | -0.290 | 0.535 | 0.469 | -0.421 | 1.000 | ||
| 长宽比 Aspect ratio | -0.224 | -0.351 | 0.557 | -0.352 | -0.273 | -0.461 | -0.291 | -0.389 | -0.364 | 0.587 | 0.430 | -0.471 | 0.967** | 1.000 | |
| 透明度 Transparency | -0.163 | -0.235 | 0.120 | -0.372 | 0.294 | -0.209 | 0.040 | 0.203 | 0.058 | -0.032 | -0.018 | -0.228 | -0.202 | -0.246 | 1.000 |
| 主成分 Principal component | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalues | 提取载荷平方和 Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | |
| 1 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 |
| 2 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 |
| 3 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 |
| 4 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 |
| 5 | 0.993 | 6.617 | 91.393 | |||
| 6 | 0.580 | 3.868 | 95.261 | |||
| 7 | 0.412 | 2.746 | 98.007 | |||
| 8 | 0.188 | 1.252 | 99.259 | |||
| 9 | 0.080 | 0.530 | 99.789 | |||
| 10 | 0.032 | 0.211 | 100.000 | |||
表5 主成分特征值
Tab.5 Principal component eigenvalues
| 主成分 Principal component | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalues | 提取载荷平方和 Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | |
| 1 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 |
| 2 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 |
| 3 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 |
| 4 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 |
| 5 | 0.993 | 6.617 | 91.393 | |||
| 6 | 0.580 | 3.868 | 95.261 | |||
| 7 | 0.412 | 2.746 | 98.007 | |||
| 8 | 0.188 | 1.252 | 99.259 | |||
| 9 | 0.080 | 0.530 | 99.789 | |||
| 10 | 0.032 | 0.211 | 100.000 | |||
| 品种 Variety | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 主成分1 PC 1 | 主成分2 PC 2 | 主成分3 PC 3 | 主成分4 PC 4 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | -0.797 6 | -2.494 2 | 0.405 0 | 0.447 3 | -1.884 4 | -4.745 5 | 0.556 7 | 0.570 1 | -2.022 6 | 11 |
| 新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | -0.630 2 | 0.770 2 | -1.522 7 | 0.503 2 | -1.488 8 | 1.465 4 | -2.092 8 | 0.641 4 | -0.465 3 | 8 |
| 新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | -0.560 4 | 1.490 7 | -0.090 9 | 0.817 9 | -1.324 0 | 2.836 2 | -0.124 9 | 1.042 6 | 0.340 9 | 4 |
| 新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 1.140 4 | 0.061 9 | -0.384 8 | -0.157 9 | 2.694 4 | 0.117 7 | -0.528 9 | -0.201 3 | 1.112 0 | 2 |
| 新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 1.114 6 | -0.305 9 | -0.548 6 | -1.725 2 | 2.633 5 | -0.582 0 | -0.754 0 | -2.199 2 | 0.597 3 | 3 |
| 新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | -1.185 9 | 0.345 2 | 1.059 1 | 0.395 8 | -2.801 8 | 0.656 8 | 1.455 6 | 0.504 5 | -0.762 2 | 9 |
| 新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | -1.060 6 | 0.509 1 | 0.728 8 | -2.150 9 | -2.505 9 | 0.968 7 | 1.001 7 | -2.741 8 | -1.025 8 | 10 |
| 新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 0.478 2 | -0.295 7 | -1.187 5 | 0.207 4 | 1.129 8 | -0.562 5 | -1.632 0 | 0.264 4 | 0.127 2 | 5 |
| 新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | -0.316 2 | 0.022 6 | 0.573 4 | 0.277 8 | -0.747 1 | 0.043 0 | 0.788 1 | 0.354 2 | -0.153 4 | 6 |
| 新粳伊20号 XinJingyi 20 | 1.802 7 | 0.392 3 | 1.748 9 | 0.778 2 | 4.259 0 | 0.746 4 | 2.403 7 | 0.992 0 | 2.565 9 | 1 |
| 新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 0.014 9 | -0.496 3 | -0.780 9 | 0.606 5 | 0.035 3 | -0.944 2 | -1.073 3 | 0.773 1 | -0.313 9 | 7 |
表6 不同香型水稻品种主成分综合得分和排序
Tab.6 Composite score of principal component and order of different aromatic rice varieties
| 品种 Variety | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 主成分1 PC 1 | 主成分2 PC 2 | 主成分3 PC 3 | 主成分4 PC 4 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | -0.797 6 | -2.494 2 | 0.405 0 | 0.447 3 | -1.884 4 | -4.745 5 | 0.556 7 | 0.570 1 | -2.022 6 | 11 |
| 新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | -0.630 2 | 0.770 2 | -1.522 7 | 0.503 2 | -1.488 8 | 1.465 4 | -2.092 8 | 0.641 4 | -0.465 3 | 8 |
| 新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | -0.560 4 | 1.490 7 | -0.090 9 | 0.817 9 | -1.324 0 | 2.836 2 | -0.124 9 | 1.042 6 | 0.340 9 | 4 |
| 新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 1.140 4 | 0.061 9 | -0.384 8 | -0.157 9 | 2.694 4 | 0.117 7 | -0.528 9 | -0.201 3 | 1.112 0 | 2 |
| 新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 1.114 6 | -0.305 9 | -0.548 6 | -1.725 2 | 2.633 5 | -0.582 0 | -0.754 0 | -2.199 2 | 0.597 3 | 3 |
| 新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | -1.185 9 | 0.345 2 | 1.059 1 | 0.395 8 | -2.801 8 | 0.656 8 | 1.455 6 | 0.504 5 | -0.762 2 | 9 |
| 新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | -1.060 6 | 0.509 1 | 0.728 8 | -2.150 9 | -2.505 9 | 0.968 7 | 1.001 7 | -2.741 8 | -1.025 8 | 10 |
| 新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 0.478 2 | -0.295 7 | -1.187 5 | 0.207 4 | 1.129 8 | -0.562 5 | -1.632 0 | 0.264 4 | 0.127 2 | 5 |
| 新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | -0.316 2 | 0.022 6 | 0.573 4 | 0.277 8 | -0.747 1 | 0.043 0 | 0.788 1 | 0.354 2 | -0.153 4 | 6 |
| 新粳伊20号 XinJingyi 20 | 1.802 7 | 0.392 3 | 1.748 9 | 0.778 2 | 4.259 0 | 0.746 4 | 2.403 7 | 0.992 0 | 2.565 9 | 1 |
| 新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 0.014 9 | -0.496 3 | -0.780 9 | 0.606 5 | 0.035 3 | -0.944 2 | -1.073 3 | 0.773 1 | -0.313 9 | 7 |
| [1] |
Patel D P, Das A, Munda G C, et al. Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills ecosystem[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(9):1269-1276.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
ZHANG Huimin, XU Minggang, SHI Xiaojun, et al. Rice yield, potassium uptake and apparent balance under long-term fertilization in rice-based cropping systems in Southern China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2010, 88(3): 341-349.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 于深州, 赵一洲, 王绍林, 等. 不同育种方法对粳型香稻早世代外观品质性状的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(5):915-920. |
| YU Shenzhou, ZHAO Yizhou, WANG Shaolin, et al. Effects of different breeding methods on appearance quality traits of early generations of japonica aromatic rice[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(5): 915-920. | |
| [4] |
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 袁杰, 朱小霞, 等. 新疆稻区优质丰产水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 2108-2117.
DOI |
|
Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, YUAN Jie, ZHU Xiaoxia, et al. Screening and evaluation of high-quality and high-yield rice varieties in ecological regions of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11): 2108-2117.
DOI |
|
| [5] |
Lau W C P, Rafii M Y, Ismail M R, et al. Review of functional markers for improving cooking, eating, and the nutritional qualities of rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6:832.
DOI PMID |
| [6] |
Mo Zhaowen, Li Wu, Pan Shenggang, et al. Shading during the grain filling period increases 2-acetyl-1- pyrroline content in fragrant rice[J]. Rice, 2015, 8(1): 9.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
曾仁杰. 不同播期对优质稻玉针香产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(6): 100-103.
DOI |
|
ZENG Renjie. Effects of different sowing dates on the yield and grain quality of yuzhenxiang[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(6): 100-103.
DOI |
|
| [8] |
韦小珊, 梁俭伟, 张集胜, 等. 不同灌溉方式对香稻产量品质及水分利用率的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(4): 129-136.
DOI |
| WEI Xiaoshan, LIANG Jianwei, ZHANG Jisheng, et al. Effects of different irrigation methods on yield, quality and water use efficiency of fragrant rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(4): 129-136. | |
| [9] |
邢丕鹏, 刘金海, 罗昊文, 等. 有机栽培条件下不同机械种植方式对香稻产量、品质以及香气的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(5): 41-44.
DOI |
|
XING Pipeng, LIU Jinhai, LUO Haowen, et al. Effects of different mechanical planting methods on yield, quality and aroma of fragrant rice under organic cultivation conditions[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(5): 41-44.
DOI |
|
| [10] |
宫彦龙, 雷月, 闫志强, 等. 收获期对优质稻大粒香品质性状的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(3): 81-83.
DOI |
|
GONG Yanlong, LEI Yue, YAN Zhiqiang, et al. Effects of harvesting time on quality traits of high quality rice variety Dalixiang[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(3): 81-83.
DOI |
|
| [11] | 刘化龙, 张宇, 邹德堂, 等. 香稻种质资源筛选及香味基因遗传研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, 30(6): 21-26. |
| Liu Hualong, Zhang Yu, Zou Detang, et al. Screening for aromatic rice germplasm resources and genetic research of fragrance gene[J]. Crops, 2014, 30(6): 21-26. | |
| [12] | 彭波, 于静波, 何璐璐, 等. 豫南香稻种质资源稻米氨基酸含量的检测与分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(7): 1524-1530. |
| PENG Bo, YU Jingbo, HE Lulu, et al. Detection and analysis of amino acid contents of fragrant rice germplasm resources in south of Henan province[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(7): 1524-1530. | |
| [13] |
魏晓东, 张亚东, 赵凌, 等. 稻米香味物质2-乙酰-1-吡咯啉的形成及其影响因素[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 131-138.
DOI |
|
WEI Xiaodong, ZHANG Yadong, ZHAO Ling, et al. Research progress in biosynthesis and influencing factors of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in fragrant rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 131-138.
DOI |
|
| [14] | 王远征, 王晓菁, 李源, 等. 北方粳稻产量与品质性状及其相互关系分析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(6): 910-918. |
|
WANG Yuanzheng, WANG Xiaojing, LI Yuan, et al. Analysis of yield and quality traits and their relationship in japonica rice in Northern China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(6): 910-918.
DOI URL |
|
| [15] | 韩瑞才, 文春燕, 沈显华, 等. 藏区不同类型水稻品种产量和稻米品质特性分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 1-7. |
| HAN Ruicai, WEN Chunyan, SHEN Xianhua, et al. Analysis of yield and rice quality characteristics of different types of rice varieties in Tibetan Area[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2021, 33(11): 1-7. | |
| [16] | 陈重远, 张大双, 张习春, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对籼稻资源品质性状的综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(24): 8330-8340. |
| CHEN Zhongyuan, ZHANG Dashuang, ZHANG Xichun, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of quality traits of indica rice resources based on PCA and CA[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(24): 8330-8340. | |
| [17] |
毛红艳, 徐鑫, 于明. 新疆地区玉米品种营养品质主成分分析与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1909-1915.
DOI |
|
MAO Hongyan, XU Xin, YU Ying. Principal component analysis and evaluation of nutritional quality of maize cultivars in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(10): 1909-1915.
DOI |
|
| [18] | LYU Hongbin, QIAN Min, LI Chaohua, et al. The principal component analysis on yielding and agronomic traits of hybrid rice of liangyou 2111[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18(3): 483-486. |
| [1] | 靳娟, 李丽莉, 杨磊, 樊丁宇, 郝庆. 新疆红枣产业发展现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
| [2] | 方辉, 丁银灯, 范贵强, 高永红, 黄天荣. 新疆南疆小麦产业发展的现状及品质特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
| [3] | 杨明花, 廖必勇, 刘强, 彭云承, 达吾来·杰克山, 冯国瑞, 唐式敏. 鲜食糯玉米籽粒营养品质的差异变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093. |
| [4] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
| [5] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
| [6] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
| [7] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
| [8] | 刘晶, 杜明川, 张文婷, 鲍海娟, 景美玲, 杜文华. 青海不同地区小黑麦种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
| [9] | 田海燕, 张占琴, 颉建辉, 王建江, 杨相昆. 加工番茄果实番茄红素与主要品质性状的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
| [10] | 阿热孜姑·吐逊, 高杰. 干旱胁迫和播种密度对洋葱小鳞茎生理特性及产出鳞茎个数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2211-2222. |
| [11] | 张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
| [12] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
| [13] | 乔雅洁, 付慧鑫, 乔雪, 孟新涛, 张婷, 潘俨. 不同贮藏温度条件下鲜牛肉品质的变化规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2323-2329. |
| [14] | 张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
| [15] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||