

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 63-69.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.008
• 作物遗传育种·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·种质资源 • 上一篇 下一篇
康靓1(
), 张娜1, 张永强2(
), 陈传信2, 雷钧杰2, 徐文修1(
)
收稿日期:2020-07-24
出版日期:2022-01-20
发布日期:2022-02-18
通信作者:
张永强(1988-),男,河南平舆人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为小麦高产栽培生理,(E-mail) zyq988@yeah.net;作者简介:康靓(1995-),女,内蒙古赤峰人,硕士,研究方向为小麦高产栽培生理,(E-mail) 419674665@qq.com
基金资助:
KANG Liang1(
), ZHANG Na1, ZHANG Yongqiang2(
), CHEN Chuanxin2, LEI Junjie2, XU Wenxiu1(
)
Received:2020-07-24
Published:2022-01-20
Online:2022-02-18
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】分析矮壮素滴施量对滴灌冬小麦茎秆特征及其抗倒伏性的影响,研究滴灌冬小麦抗倒伏的矮壮素最佳滴施量,为新疆滴灌小麦抗倒伏及其调控措施提供理论依据。【方法】于2018~2019年在大田滴灌条件下,设置5个不同矮壮素滴施量,分别为0 mL/hm2(D0)、1 500 mL/ hm2(D1)、3 000 mL/hm2(D2)、4 500 mL/hm2(D3)、6 000 mL/hm2(D4)及对常规喷施用量3 000 mL/hm2(CK),分析不同处理对滴灌冬小麦株高、茎粗、重心高度、茎秆机械强度、基部节间充实度、茎秆抗倒伏指数及田间倒伏率和产量的影响。【结果】随矮壮素滴施量的增加,滴灌冬小麦株高、基部节间长和重心高度比均表现出不同程度的下降,茎秆抗倒伏指数呈上升趋势。田间倒伏率随着矮壮素滴施量的增加而逐渐降低,与CK相比,D2、D3、D4处理的均明显降低。籽粒产量以D3处理为最高,为8 098.9 kg/hm2,分别较D0、D1、D2、D4、CK提高了12.21%、6.53%、3.75%、5.74%、6.51%。【结论】矮壮素滴施用量为4 500 mL/hm2时,滴灌冬小麦茎秆高度适宜,重心高度比相对较低,抗倒伏指数相对较高,籽粒产量最高。
中图分类号:
康靓, 张娜, 张永强, 陈传信, 雷钧杰, 徐文修. 矮壮素滴施量对滴灌冬小麦茎秆特征及其抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 63-69.
KANG Liang, ZHANG Na, ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, LEI Junjie, XU Wenxiu. Effects of CCC Irrigation Amount on Stem Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Winter Wheat under Drip Irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 63-69.
| 冬前 Pre-winter | 起身期 Upstanding Stage | 拔节期 Jointing Stage | 孕穗期 Booting Stage | 抽穗期 Heading Stage | 开花期 Flowering Stage | 灌浆前期 Early Stage of Filling | 灌浆中期 Middle Stage of Filling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 灌水模数 | 30% | 25% | 10% | 15% | 10% | 10% | |
| 60 | 250 | 75 | 62.5 | 25 | 37.5 | 25 | 25 |
表1 灌水时期及灌水量
Table 1 Amount of drip irrigation at different stages(m3/hm2)
| 冬前 Pre-winter | 起身期 Upstanding Stage | 拔节期 Jointing Stage | 孕穗期 Booting Stage | 抽穗期 Heading Stage | 开花期 Flowering Stage | 灌浆前期 Early Stage of Filling | 灌浆中期 Middle Stage of Filling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 灌水模数 | 30% | 25% | 10% | 15% | 10% | 10% | |
| 60 | 250 | 75 | 62.5 | 25 | 37.5 | 25 | 25 |
| 处理 Treatments | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 倒1节间长度 Inverted 1st internode length (cm) | 倒2节间长度 Inverted 2nd internode length (cm) | 倒3节间长度 Inverted 3rd internode length (cm) | 倒4节间长度 Inverted 4th internode length (cm) | 倒5节间长度 Inverted 5th internode lengt (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D0 | 114.62a | 38.78a | 26.12a | 16.89ab | 14.71a | 10.27a |
| D1 | 108.38b | 36.82b | 24.43b | 15.58b | 13.57b | 9.64bc |
| D2 | 111.55ab | 34.08c | 23.84c | 15.75b | 14.19ab | 9.85ab |
| D3 | 109.47b | 32.98c | 23.89c | 15.35c | 13.68b | 9.00c |
| D4 | 91.40c | 30.50e | 21.02d | 15.27c | 13.52b | 8.74c |
| CK | 99.90b | 33.48c | 24.57b | 15.96b | 13.49b | 9.70bc |
表2 不同矮壮素滴施量下滴灌冬小麦节间长度及株高数变化
Table 2 Effects of different amounts of CCC drip on the internode length and the plant height of winter wheat under drip irrigation
| 处理 Treatments | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 倒1节间长度 Inverted 1st internode length (cm) | 倒2节间长度 Inverted 2nd internode length (cm) | 倒3节间长度 Inverted 3rd internode length (cm) | 倒4节间长度 Inverted 4th internode length (cm) | 倒5节间长度 Inverted 5th internode lengt (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D0 | 114.62a | 38.78a | 26.12a | 16.89ab | 14.71a | 10.27a |
| D1 | 108.38b | 36.82b | 24.43b | 15.58b | 13.57b | 9.64bc |
| D2 | 111.55ab | 34.08c | 23.84c | 15.75b | 14.19ab | 9.85ab |
| D3 | 109.47b | 32.98c | 23.89c | 15.35c | 13.68b | 9.00c |
| D4 | 91.40c | 30.50e | 21.02d | 15.27c | 13.52b | 8.74c |
| CK | 99.90b | 33.48c | 24.57b | 15.96b | 13.49b | 9.70bc |
| 处理 Treatments | 开花期Anthesis stage | 乳熟期Mile stage | 成熟期Dough stage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 重心高度比 Percentage of the centre of gravity(%) | 基部节间充实度 Filling degree (mg/cm) | 重心高度比 Percentage of the centre of gravity(%) | 基部节间充实度 Filling degree (mg/cm) | 重心高度比 Percentage of the centre of gravity(%) | 基部节间充实度 Filling degree (mg/cm) | |||
| D0 | 46.52c | 16.78cd | 47.67c | 22.35b | 47.04b | 21.34d | ||
| D1 | 46.69c | 17.09d | 47.70c | 19.90cd | 46.37c | 22.72c | ||
| D2 | 47.24bc | 17.23d | 48.02b | 19.18d | 47.15b | 23.43c | ||
| D3 | 47.06bc | 19.82b | 48.29b | 26.73a | 47.54b | 24.60b | ||
| D4 | 48.31b | 20.95a | 49.37b | 22.27b | 47.55b | 29.74a | ||
| CK | 52.46a | 16.85d | 54.75a | 22.12b | 52.67a | 22.62c | ||
表3 矮壮素不同滴施量下滴灌冬小麦重心高度比和基部节间充实度变化
Table 3 Effects of different amounts of CCC drip irrigation on the rate of height of gravity centre and the culm filling degree of winter wheat under drip irrigation
| 处理 Treatments | 开花期Anthesis stage | 乳熟期Mile stage | 成熟期Dough stage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 重心高度比 Percentage of the centre of gravity(%) | 基部节间充实度 Filling degree (mg/cm) | 重心高度比 Percentage of the centre of gravity(%) | 基部节间充实度 Filling degree (mg/cm) | 重心高度比 Percentage of the centre of gravity(%) | 基部节间充实度 Filling degree (mg/cm) | |||
| D0 | 46.52c | 16.78cd | 47.67c | 22.35b | 47.04b | 21.34d | ||
| D1 | 46.69c | 17.09d | 47.70c | 19.90cd | 46.37c | 22.72c | ||
| D2 | 47.24bc | 17.23d | 48.02b | 19.18d | 47.15b | 23.43c | ||
| D3 | 47.06bc | 19.82b | 48.29b | 26.73a | 47.54b | 24.60b | ||
| D4 | 48.31b | 20.95a | 49.37b | 22.27b | 47.55b | 29.74a | ||
| CK | 52.46a | 16.85d | 54.75a | 22.12b | 52.67a | 22.62c | ||
| 处理 Treatments | 开花期Anthesis stage | 乳熟期Mile stage | 成熟期Dough stage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 机械强度 Mechanical strength(N) | 抗倒伏指数 Lodging index | 机械强度 Mechanical strength(N) | 抗倒伏指数 Lodging index | 机械强度 Mechanical strength(N) | 抗倒伏指数 Lodging index | |||
| D0 | 13.15d | 0.30bc | 7.45d | 0.15d | 6.59d | 0.13d | ||
| D1 | 13.13d | 0.28cd | 7.91cd | 0.16cd | 7.24c | 0.14c | ||
| D2 | 13.55c | 0.29cd | 8.44c | 0.17c | 7.96b | 0.15b | ||
| D3 | 14.73a | 0.32b | 9.79a | 0.19b | 8.84a | 0.16ab | ||
| D4 | 14.05b | 0.36a | 9.02ab | 0.20a | 8.40b | 0.17a | ||
| CK | 13.31c | 0.27d | 8.06cd | 0.16cd | 7.25c | 0.14c | ||
表4 矮壮素不同滴施量下滴灌冬小麦茎秆物理特性变化
Table 4 Effects of different amounts of CCC drip irrigation on stem mechanical strength and lodging index of winter wheat under drip irrigation
| 处理 Treatments | 开花期Anthesis stage | 乳熟期Mile stage | 成熟期Dough stage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 机械强度 Mechanical strength(N) | 抗倒伏指数 Lodging index | 机械强度 Mechanical strength(N) | 抗倒伏指数 Lodging index | 机械强度 Mechanical strength(N) | 抗倒伏指数 Lodging index | |||
| D0 | 13.15d | 0.30bc | 7.45d | 0.15d | 6.59d | 0.13d | ||
| D1 | 13.13d | 0.28cd | 7.91cd | 0.16cd | 7.24c | 0.14c | ||
| D2 | 13.55c | 0.29cd | 8.44c | 0.17c | 7.96b | 0.15b | ||
| D3 | 14.73a | 0.32b | 9.79a | 0.19b | 8.84a | 0.16ab | ||
| D4 | 14.05b | 0.36a | 9.02ab | 0.20a | 8.40b | 0.17a | ||
| CK | 13.31c | 0.27d | 8.06cd | 0.16cd | 7.25c | 0.14c | ||
| 处理 Treatments | 有效穗数 Spike number (104穗/hm2) | 穗粒数 Grain number (粒) | 千粒重 1,000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 地上部分 生物量 Total biomass (kg/hm2) | 收获系数 Harvest index HI | 倒伏率 Lodging percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D0 | 573.25c | 43.8ab | 42.18ab | 7 217.94d | 17 753.5a | 0.406c | 24.07a |
| D1 | 556.24c | 43.89ab | 40.22b | 7 602.43cd | 16 824.3b | 0.451b | 16.67b |
| D2 | 630.58b | 41.6b | 40.38b | 7 805.87ab | 16 900.3b | 0.461a | 13.43c |
| D3 | 664.33a | 44.17ab | 40.89b | 8 098.9a | 18 264.3a | 0.443b | 11.11d |
| D4 | 625.46b | 45.60a | 40.11b | 7 659.07bc | 16 114.6c | 0.475a | 7.87e |
| CK | 549.94c | 44.57ab | 43.33a | 7 603.93cd | 15 934.1c | 0.477a | 13.89c |
表5 矮壮素不同滴施量下滴灌冬小麦产量和产量构成以及田间倒伏率变化
Table 5 Effects of different amounts of CCC drip irrigation on the yield, yield components and field lodging rate of winter wheat under drip irrigation
| 处理 Treatments | 有效穗数 Spike number (104穗/hm2) | 穗粒数 Grain number (粒) | 千粒重 1,000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 地上部分 生物量 Total biomass (kg/hm2) | 收获系数 Harvest index HI | 倒伏率 Lodging percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D0 | 573.25c | 43.8ab | 42.18ab | 7 217.94d | 17 753.5a | 0.406c | 24.07a |
| D1 | 556.24c | 43.89ab | 40.22b | 7 602.43cd | 16 824.3b | 0.451b | 16.67b |
| D2 | 630.58b | 41.6b | 40.38b | 7 805.87ab | 16 900.3b | 0.461a | 13.43c |
| D3 | 664.33a | 44.17ab | 40.89b | 8 098.9a | 18 264.3a | 0.443b | 11.11d |
| D4 | 625.46b | 45.60a | 40.11b | 7 659.07bc | 16 114.6c | 0.475a | 7.87e |
| CK | 549.94c | 44.57ab | 43.33a | 7 603.93cd | 15 934.1c | 0.477a | 13.89c |
| [1] | 新疆维吾尔自治区统计年鉴[J]. 中国统计出版社, 2018. |
| Statistic Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang statistical yearbook [J]. Beijing: China Statistic Press, 2018. | |
| [2] | Lai K, Berkman P J, Lorenc M T, et al. WheatGenome.Info: an integrated database and portal for wheat genome information[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2012, 53(2):e2(1-7). |
| [3] |
Briggs K G. Studies of recovery from artificially induced lodging in several six-row barley cultivars[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1990, 70(1):173-181.
DOI URL |
| [4] | 文廷刚. 植物生长调节剂对小麦抗倒伏能力、产量和品质的影响及其生理机理[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2012. |
| WEN Tinggang. Effects of plant growth regulators on lodging resistance of stem and yield, quality in wheat[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. | |
| [5] | 彭佃亮. 小麦倒伏与茎秆木质素代谢的关系及其对籽粒产量和淀粉特征的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014. |
| PENG Dianliang. Effects of lodging on grain yield and starch characteristics and its relationship to stem lignin metabolism in wheat[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014. | |
| [6] | 朱占华. 植物生长调节剂对小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力及其产量和品质的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2011. |
| ZHU Zhanhua. Effects of plant growth regulators on lodging resistance of stem and yield, quality in wheat[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011. | |
| [7] | 王成雨, 李静, 张一, 等. 化控剂对冬小麦茎秆抗倒性能、植株整齐度及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36(2):170-177. |
| WANG Chengyu, LI Jing, ZHANG Yi, et al. Effects of chemical regulation on culm lodging resistance, plant uniformity and yield of winter wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2015, 36(2):170-177. | |
| [8] | 熊乐, 马富裕, 樊华, 等. 冬灌与化学调控互作对滴灌春小麦抗倒伏能力和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(5):932-936. |
| XIONG Le, MA Fuyu, FAN Hua, et al. Interaction effects of winter irrigation and chemical regulation in lodging-resistance and yield of drip irrigated spring wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2012, 32(5):932-936. | |
| [9] | 郭建文, 田新会, 张舒芸, 等. 不同浓度矮壮素对黑麦抗倒伏性和种子产量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5):1128-1137. |
| GUO Jianwen, TIAN Xinhui, ZHANG Shuyun, et al. Effect of different chlorocholine chlorid (CCC) concentrations on lodging resistance and seed yield of rye[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5):1128-1137. | |
| [10] | 华智锐, 李小玲. 矮壮素对小麦抗倒伏性能的诱导效应研究[J]. 河北农业科学, 2017, 21(2):47-51,71. |
| HUA Zhirui, LI Xiaoling. Researches of CCC in induction lodging resistance of wheat[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 21(2):47-51,71. | |
| [11] | 孙岩, 张宏纪, 辛文利, 等. 苗期镇压与矮壮素结合处理对小麦生育及其基部节生长的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2013,(2):14-16. |
| SUN Yan, ZHANG Hongji, XIN Wenli, et al. Influence of rolling and spraying TUR at seedling stage on growth period and growth of base stem for wheat[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013,(2):14-16. | |
| [12] | 马瑞琦, 亓振, 常旭虹, 等. 化控剂对冬小麦植株性状及产量品质的调节效应[J]. 作物杂志, 2018,(1):133-140. |
| MA Ruiqi, QI Zhen, CHANG Xuhong, et al. Regulation effects of growth regulators on plant characters, yield and quality of winter wheat[J]. Crops, 2018,(1):133-140. | |
| [13] | 王勇, 李晴祺, 李朝恒, 等. 小麦品种茎秆的质量及解剖学研究[J]. 作物学报, 1998,(4):452-458,516. |
| WANG Yong, LI Qingqi, LI Chaoheng, et al. Studies on the culm quality and anatomy of wheat varieties[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1998,(4):452-458,516. | |
| 位国峰, 林琪, 商健, 等. 不同滴灌量对冬小麦水分利用及品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(4):200-205. | |
| WEI Guofeng, LIN Qi, SHANG Jian, et al. Effects of different drip irrigation amount on water use efficiency and quality of winter wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2015, 30(4):200-205. | |
| [14] | 黄振江. 南疆滴灌小麦需水规律与灌溉制度研究[D]. 阿拉尔:塔里木大学, 2018. |
| HUANG Zhenjiang. Research on water requirement pattern and irrigation system of wheat under drip irrigation in South Xinjiang[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2018. | |
| [15] | 程裕伟. 北疆地区滴灌春小麦需水规律及产量形成特征研究[D]. 石河子:石河子大学, 2010. |
| CHENG Yuwei. Study on characteristics of the water requirement and yield components in spring wheat under drip irrigation in Northern Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2010. | |
| [16] | 张娜. 滴灌量及施氮量对冬小麦生理生态特征的影响研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2016. |
| ZHANG Na. Effect of irrigation amount and nitrogen levels on the physiological and ecological characteristics of winter wheat under drip irrigation[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016. | |
| [17] | 王荣栋, 王新武, 符林, 等. 关于滴灌小麦栽培的几个问题[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(7):1412-1415. |
| WANG Rongdong, WANG Xinwu, FU Lin, et al. Several Problems about Wheat Cultivation by Drip Irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 47(7):1412-1415. | |
| [18] | 陈东. 新疆小麦滴灌技术的应用现状、存在问题及对策[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2018, 41(5):7-8. |
| CHEN Dong. Application status, existing problems and countermeasures of drip irrigation technology for wheat in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2018, 41(5):7-8. | |
| [19] | 李召锋, 杨茂深, 周英, 等. 滴灌春小麦蜡熟期抗倒性综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15(8):3199-3209. |
| LI Zhaofeng, YANG Maoshen, ZHOU Ying, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on lodging resistance of spring wheat at dough stage under drip irrigation[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2017, 15(8):3199-3209. | |
| [20] | 郭建文, 田新会, 张舒芸, 等. 拔节期喷施矮壮素对小黑麦抗倒伏性及产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2018, 53(6):42-49. |
| GUO Jianwen, TIAN Xinhui, ZHANG Shuyun, et al. Effects of chormequat chaloride on lodging resistance and yield of triticale at jointing stage[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2018, 53(6):42-49. |
| [1] | 张磊, 孙诗仁, 谢小清, 王业建, 李冬, 唐怀君, 刘成. 额敏县玉米灌溉用水现状及节水灌溉策略[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 81-84. |
| [2] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
| [3] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
| [4] | 胡华兵, 孙琳琳, 刘建雄, 贺碧微, 刘珣, 郇町, 李有芳. 滴灌甜菜糖分积累与温度的相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1916-1925. |
| [5] | 杜云, 张婧婧, 雷嘉诚, 李博, 李永福. 冬小麦需水量的预测模型对比分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1590-1596. |
| [6] | 许进宗, 包建平. 不同滴灌灌水量对库尔勒香梨果实贮藏品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1696-1709. |
| [7] | 王润琪, 贾永红, 王玉娇, 刘跃, 李丹丹, 董艳雪, 古力尼尕尔·吐尔洪, 张路路, 张金汕, 石书兵. 不同滴灌量对匀播冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1048-1056. |
| [8] | 谢忠, 叶含春, 王振华, 李海强, 刘健, 陈睿, 许宇双. 浅埋滴灌水氮配施对冬小麦生长发育、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1057-1066. |
| [9] | 张钊, 张贵龙, 汤秋香, 闫雪影, 张艳军. 有机无机肥配施对潮土麦田肥力和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1067-1076. |
| [10] | 付浩, 张学军, 史增录, 程金鹏, 吴海峰, 于永良, 饶志强. 滴灌区玉米精量免耕播种机设计与试验[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1094-1101. |
| [11] | 王晓艳, 白云岗, 柴仲平, 郑明, 丁宇, 刘洪波, 肖军, 韩政宇. 滴灌冬灌调控下干播湿出对棉田水盐分布及棉花出苗率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 823-834. |
| [12] | 朱韬, 雷庆元, 马亮. 不同水氮用量对复播玉米生长发育、产量及利用效率的影响和选优模型验证[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 835-844. |
| [13] | 付彦博, 扁青永, 魏亚媛, 魏彦宏, 张万旭, 朱锦泉. 配方施肥对滴灌玉米生理生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 878-884. |
| [14] | 党旭伟, 林馨园, 贺正, 陈燕, 慈宝霞, 马学花, 郭晨荔, 贺亚星, 刘扬, 马富裕. 基于无人机热红外遥感图像提取滴灌棉花冠层温度及精度评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 565-575. |
| [15] | 蒲明, 宋学栋, 张鹏, 张明敏, 张代玉, 薛莲, 袁宁, 王海鹏, 高铁功. 不同滴灌技术水肥耦合在设施黄瓜上的应用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 402-412. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||