盐碱地膜下滴水春灌下土壤盐分淋洗机制

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.017

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 1720-1730.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.017

盐碱地膜下滴水春灌下土壤盐分淋洗机制

陈静¹^,²(), 蒲胜海², 王则玉², 刘小利², 徐娟娟¹^,², 苟燕如², 许咏梅², 李宁¹, 马兴旺¹^,²()

1.新疆农业大学资源与环境学院, 乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业农村部西北绿洲农业环境重点实验室/库尔勒农业面源污染新疆野外科学观测研究站, 乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2024-12-05 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-09-05
通信作者: 马兴旺(1970-),男,宁夏人,研究员,博士,研究方向为农业面源污染,(E-mail)maxw@xaas.ac.cn
作者简介:陈静(1997-),女,河南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业资源利用,(E-mail)2931316091@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1900803);“天山英才”培养计划(2022TSYCLJ0050);农业科技创新稳定支持项目(xjnkywdzc-2023005-6)

The mechanism of soil salt leaching under spring irrigation with drip water under saline alkali plastic film

CHEN Jing¹^,²(), PU Shenghai², WANG Zeyu², LIU Xiaoli², XU Juanjuan¹^,², GOU Yanru², XU Yongmei², LI Ning¹, MA Xingwang¹^,²()

1. College of Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830091, China
2. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Agroenvironment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/.Xinjiang Field Scientific Observation and Research Station of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution in Korla, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2024-12-05 Published:2025-07-20 Online:2025-09-05
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program Project(2021YFD1900803);"Tianshan Talent" Training Program(2022TSYCLJ0050);Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Stability Support Project(xjnkywdzc-2023005-6)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】大定额畦灌冬春灌洗盐压碱模式难以支撑西北绿洲水资源短缺的可持续发展,探索以高效用水为目标的滴水春灌方式,将有助于减少盐碱地淋洗定额。【方法】设置田间小区试验,比较滴水春灌下不同淋洗定额(W₁:750 m³/hm²,W₂:1 125 m³/hm²,W₃:1 500 m³/hm²,W₄:1 875 m³/hm²,W₅:2 250 m³/hm²)下0~100 cm土层土壤盐分及盐基离子的分布情况,并以畦灌2 250 m³/hm²为对照。【结果】土壤剖面盐分含量表现为窄行<宽行<膜间,且随着淋洗定额的增加,相同土层深度含盐量呈降低趋势。在滴水春灌方式下膜内脱盐率较高,膜间脱盐率较低;与畦灌相比,脱盐率表现为膜内>畦灌>膜间;整体表现为滴灌脱盐率高于畦灌,在2 250 m³/hm²灌溉定额下,滴灌比畦灌的脱盐率高61.77%。经过滴水春灌淋洗后,SO^2- ₄、Ca²⁺、Cl^-和Na⁺的含量有所降低。【结论】在拥有稳定水源供应且滴灌系统完备的地下水灌溉或地表灌溉区域内,采用滴水春灌方式替代传统的畦灌方式,不仅可以将春灌定额降低20%,更能显著提升脱盐率至67.9%,为作物生长营造较适宜的盐分环境。

关键词: 盐碱地; 滴水春灌; 灌溉定额; 盐分淋洗

Abstract:

【Objective】 The large quota border irrigation winter and spring irrigation with salt and alkali pressure model is difficult to support the sustainable development of soil and water resources in the northwest oasis. In veiw of this, this research aims to explore a drip spring irrigation method with efficient water use as the goal which might help reduce the quota of saline alkali land leaching. 【Methods】 By conducting field experiments, the distribution of soil salinity and base ions in the 0-100 cm soil layer was compared under different rinsing quotas (W₁: 750 m³/hm², W₂: 1,125 m³/hm², W₃: 1,500 m³/hm², W₄: 1,875 m³/hm², W₅: 2,250m³/hm²) under drip spring irrigation, with 2,250 m³/hm² as the control. 【Results】 The results showed that the salt content in the soil profile showed a narrow row<wide row<between films, and with the increase of leaching quota, the salt content in the same soil layer depth showed a decreasing trend. Under the drip spring irrigation method, the desalination rate inside the membrane was higher, while the desalination rate between membranes was lower; Compared with border irrigation, the desalination rate showed as follows: within film>border irrigation>between films; The overall performance was that the desalination rate of drip irrigation was higher than that of border irrigation. Under the irrigation quota of 2,250 m³/hm², the desalination rate of drip irrigation was 61.77% higher than that of border irrigation. After spring irrigation with drip water, the content of ${\mathrm{SO}}_{4}^{2-}$, Ca²⁺, Cl^-, and Na⁺decreased. 【Conclusion】 In areas with stable water supply and complete drip irrigation systems for groundwater or surface irrigation, using drip spring irrigation instead of traditional border irrigation can not only reduce spring irrigation quotas by 20%, but also significantly improve desalination rates to 67.9%, creating a more suitable salt environment for crop growth.

Key words: saline alkali land; drip water for spring irrigation; irrigation quota; salt leaching

中图分类号:

陈静, 蒲胜海, 王则玉, 刘小利, 徐娟娟, 苟燕如, 许咏梅, 李宁, 马兴旺. 盐碱地膜下滴水春灌下土壤盐分淋洗机制[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(7): 1720-1730.

CHEN Jing, PU Shenghai, WANG Zeyu, LIU Xiaoli, XU Juanjuan, GOU Yanru, XU Yongmei, LI Ning, MA Xingwang. The mechanism of soil salt leaching under spring irrigation with drip water under saline alkali plastic film[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(7): 1720-1730.

图/表 11

参考文献 26

[1]	Hou X H, Xiang Y Z, Fan J L, et al. Spatial distribution and variability of soil salinity in film-mulched cotton fields under various drip irrigation regimes in southern Xinjiang of China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022, 223: 105470.
[2]	高宏远, 刘霞, 高晓瑜, 等. 不同灌排模式下盐渍化土壤盐分及离子迁移规律及均衡分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(2): 361-370.
	GAO Hongyuan, LIU Xia, GAO Xiaoyu, et al. Analysis of salinity and ions migration law and equilibrium in salinized soil under different irrigation and drainage modes[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(2): 361-370.
[3]	Singh A. Soil salinization management for sustainable development: a review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 277: 111383.
[4]	Cuevas J, Daliakopoulos I N, del Moral F, et al. A review of soil-improving cropping systems for soil salinization[J]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(6): 295.
[5]	朱延凯, 王振华, 李文昊. 春灌对绿洲区棉田水盐分布及产量的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2018,(2): 1-6, 10.
	ZHU Yankai, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao. Effects of spring irrigation on distribution and yield of water and salt in oasis cotton field[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2018,(2): 1-6, 10.
[6]	Qadir M, Ghafoor A, Murtaza G. Amelioration strategies for saline soils: a review[J]. Land Degradation & Development,? 2000, 11(6): 501-521.
[7]	冯广平, 姜卉芳, 董新光, 等. 干旱内陆河灌区地面灌溉条件下土壤水盐运动规律研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2006, 25(3): 82-84.
	FENG Guangping, JIANG Huifang, DONG Xinguang, et al. Study on water and salt transport in soil under surface irrigation condition in arid inland river irrigatson region[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2006, 25(3): 82-84.
[8]	王兴鹏. 冬春灌对南疆土壤水盐动态和棉花生长的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2018.
	WANG Xingpeng. A Study on the Effects of Winter and Spring Irrigation on Soil Water and Salt Dynamics and Cotton Growth in Southern Xinjiang[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2018.
[9]	Ma S Q, Lv L, Meng C, et al. Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome of Sorghum bicolor reveals dynamic changes in flavonoids accumulation under saline-alkali stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2020, 68(50): 14781-14789.
[10]	于茹, 宋佳珅, 张宏媛, 等. 秸秆隔层结合春灌对河套灌区盐碱地土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(12): 2341-2353. DOI
	YU Ru, SONG Jiashen, ZHANG Hongyuan, et al. Effects of straw interlayer combined with spring irrigation on SalineAlkali soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in Hetao irrigation district[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(12): 2341-2353. DOI
[11]	刘祖汀, 王丽萍, 屈忠义, 等. 引黄春灌对盐碱土区地下水动态及理化性质的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(2): 101-108.
	LIU Zuting, WANG Liping, QU Zhongyi, et al. The changes in depth and physicochemical properties of groundwater in response to spring irrigation in Hetao irrigation district[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2022, 41(2): 101-108.
[12]	张健利, 王振华, 陈睿, 等. 灌水量和生物有机肥对滴灌枣田水盐动态及土壤养分属性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(1): 323-331.
	ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, et al. Effects of irrigation amount and bio-organic fertilizer on water and salt dynamics and soil nutrient properties of jujube field under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(1): 323-331.
[13]	孙珍珍, 岳春芳. 非生育期春灌灌水量对土壤盐分变化的影响[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2015, 26(3): 237-240.
	SUN Zhenzhen, YUE Chunfang. Effect of spring irrigation in non growth period on variation of soil salinity[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2015, 26(3): 237-240.
[14]	徐鑫, 张金珠, 李宝珠, 等. 不同盐度土壤水盐时空分布特征及对棉花出苗的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 40(2): 204-212. DOI
	XU Xin, ZHANG Jinzhu, LI Baozhu, et al. Response characteristics and numerical simulation of soil water and salt dynamics in different salinized cotton seedling stage to submembrane drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2022, 40(2): 204-212.
[15]	焦艳平, 康跃虎, 万书勤, 等. 干旱区盐碱地滴灌土壤基质势对土壤盐分分布的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(6): 53-58.
	JIAO Yanping, KANG Yuehu, WAN Shuqin, et al. Effect of soil matric potential on the distribution of soil salt under drip irrigation on saline and alkaline land in arid regions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(6): 53-58.
[16]	沈其荣, 王建林, 邱春祥, 等. 两种不同耐盐大麦根际中离子的分布特征[J]. 土壤学报, 1993, 30(4): 366-373.
	SHEN Qirong, WANG Jianlin, QIU Chunxiang, et al. Distribution characteristics of ions in the rhizosphere of two barley varieties with different salinity tolerance[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1993, 30(4): 366-373.
[17]	田野, 张焕朝, 方升佐, 等. 盐胁迫下杨树根际系统盐分离子分布特性[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2003, 12(3): 11-15.
	TIAN Ye, ZHANG Huanchao, FANG Shengzuo, et al. Distribution of K⁺, Na⁺, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ in poplar rhizosphere system under NaCl stress[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2003, 12(3): 11-15.
[18]	郭全恩, 王益权, 马忠明, 等. 植被类型对土壤剖面盐分离子迁移与累积的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(13): 2711-2720. DOI
	GUO Quanen, WANG Yiquan, MA Zhongming, et al. Effect of vegetation types on soil salt ions transfer and accumulation in soil profile[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(13): 2711-2720. DOI
[19]	巨龙, 王全九, 王琳芳, 等. 灌水量对半干旱区土壤水盐分布特征及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(1): 86-90.
	JU Long, WANG Quanjiu, WANG Linfang, et al. Effects of irrigation amounts on yield of winter wheat and distribution characteristics of soil water-salt in semi-arid region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(1): 86-90.
[20]	赵波, 王振华, 李文昊. 滴灌方式及定额对北疆冬灌棉田土壤水盐分布及次年棉花生长的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(6): 139-148.
	ZHAO Bo, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao. Effects of winter drip irrigation mode and quota on water and salt distribution in cotton field soil and cotton growth next year in northern Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(6): 139-148.
[21]	王峰, 孙景生, 刘祖贵, 等. 不同灌溉制度对棉田盐分分布与脱盐效果的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2013, 44(12): 120-127.
	WANG Feng, SUN Jingsheng, LIU Zugui, et al. Effect of different irrigation scheduling on salt distribution and leaching in cotton field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(12): 120-127.
[22]	曹振玺. 灌水处理对膜下滴灌棉花根区土壤水盐分布及WUE的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
	CAO Zhenxi. The effect of irrigation treatment on soil water and salt distribution and WUE in the root zone of cotton under subsurface drip irrigation[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021.
[23]	牟洪臣, 虎胆·吐马尔白, 苏里坦, 等. 干旱地区棉田膜下滴灌盐分运移规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(7): 18-22.
	MU Hongchen, Hudan Tumaerbai, Sulitan, et al. Salt transfer law for cotton field with drip irrigation under mulchin arid region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(7): 18-22.
[24]	李慧, 林青, 徐绍辉. 咸水/微咸水入渗对土壤渗透性和盐分阳离子运移的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(3): 656-666.
	LI Hui, LIN Qing, XU Shaohui. Effect of infiltration of saline water/brackish water on soil permeability and transport of salt cations in the soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(3): 656-666.
[25]	朱君, 李婷, 谢添, 等. 负水头环境土壤水分湿润锋运移三维模拟[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(4): 42-51, 58.
	ZHU Jun, LI Ting, XIE Tian, et al. Three-dimensional model and verification of soil wetting front migration in negative head environment[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(4): 42-51, 58.
[26]	张盼盼, 赵慧, 荣昊. 微咸水灌溉对盐碱土水盐运移的影响[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(5): 198-202, 208.
	ZHANG Panpan, ZHAO Hui, RONG Hao. Effect of brackishwater content on water and salt transport law in saline-alkali soil irrigation[J]. Yangtze River, 2021, 52(5): 198-202, 208.

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	总盐 Total salt (g/kg)	${\mathrm{CO}}_{3}^{2-}$ (g/kg)	${\mathrm{HCO}}_{3}^{-}$ (g/kg)	Cl^- (g/kg)	${\mathrm{SO}}_{4}^{2-}$ (g/kg)	Ca²⁺ (g/kg)	Mg²⁺ (g/kg)	K⁺ (g/kg)	Na⁺ (g/kg)
0~20	10.404	-	0.207	2.041	4.416	1.808	0.522	1.224	0.188
20~40	12.044	-	0.232	1.331	6.720	2.416	0.249	0.954	0.145
40~60	11.612	-	0.195	0.817	6.970	2.672	0.312	0.540	0.105
60~80	11.899	-	0.183	0.568	7.507	2.992	0.166	0.381	0.100
80~100	11.000	-	0.195	0.533	6.816	2.560	0.361	0.429	0.093

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	总盐 Total salt (g/kg)	${\mathrm{CO}}_{3}^{2-}$ (g/kg)	${\mathrm{HCO}}_{3}^{-}$ (g/kg)	Cl^- (g/kg)	${\mathrm{SO}}_{4}^{2-}$ (g/kg)	Ca²⁺ (g/kg)	Mg²⁺ (g/kg)	K⁺ (g/kg)	Na⁺ (g/kg)
0~20	10.404	-	0.207	2.041	4.416	1.808	0.522	1.224	0.188
20~40	12.044	-	0.232	1.331	6.720	2.416	0.249	0.954	0.145
40~60	11.612	-	0.195	0.817	6.970	2.672	0.312	0.540	0.105
60~80	11.899	-	0.183	0.568	7.507	2.992	0.166	0.381	0.100
80~100	11.000	-	0.195	0.533	6.816	2.560	0.361	0.429	0.093

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	取样位置 Sampling location	W₁	W₂	W₃	W₄	W₅	CK
0~20	Z	17.05	22.82	59.92	60.01	78.37	24.55
	K	16.86	19.36	43.29	58.09	63.86	24.55
	J	12.09	14.09	19.45	29.64	60.88	14.55
20~40	Z	1.86	4.81	49.93	50.18	52.42	4.26
	K	-0.22	3.68	19.13	45.78	46.94	4.26
	J	-6.14	0.66	3.46	29.09	34.82	-3.74
40~60	Z	-14.71	-14.54	-6.70	12.25	37.39	-11.8
	K	-16.78	-14.88	-11.95	1.05	28.44	-11.8
	J	-24.63	-21.06	-11.77	6.64	16.09	-17.8
60~80	Z	-29.67	-29.01	-5.81	-1.27	35.71	-28.4
	K	-29.86	-29.60	-11.94	-3.71	27.31	-28.4
	J	-29.94	-29.10	-16.43	-15.98	4.95	-32
80~100	Z	-35.63	-35.90	-18.18	-10.45	30.37	-28.63
	K	-36.18	-36.18	-29.18	-26.27	9	-28.63
	J	-46.87	-45.33	-20.31	-21.77	-5.67	-30.63
0~100	Z	-10.48	-9.03	15.41	21.79	46.35	-7.88
	K	-11.94	-10.01	1.38	14.66	34.83	-7.88
	J	-18.21	-14.78	-5.88	5.07	21.47	-13.92

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	取样位置 Sampling location	W₁	W₂	W₃	W₄	W₅	CK
0~20	Z	17.05	22.82	59.92	60.01	78.37	24.55
	K	16.86	19.36	43.29	58.09	63.86	24.55
	J	12.09	14.09	19.45	29.64	60.88	14.55
20~40	Z	1.86	4.81	49.93	50.18	52.42	4.26
	K	-0.22	3.68	19.13	45.78	46.94	4.26
	J	-6.14	0.66	3.46	29.09	34.82	-3.74
40~60	Z	-14.71	-14.54	-6.70	12.25	37.39	-11.8
	K	-16.78	-14.88	-11.95	1.05	28.44	-11.8
	J	-24.63	-21.06	-11.77	6.64	16.09	-17.8
60~80	Z	-29.67	-29.01	-5.81	-1.27	35.71	-28.4
	K	-29.86	-29.60	-11.94	-3.71	27.31	-28.4
	J	-29.94	-29.10	-16.43	-15.98	4.95	-32
80~100	Z	-35.63	-35.90	-18.18	-10.45	30.37	-28.63
	K	-36.18	-36.18	-29.18	-26.27	9	-28.63
	J	-46.87	-45.33	-20.31	-21.77	-5.67	-30.63
0~100	Z	-10.48	-9.03	15.41	21.79	46.35	-7.88
	K	-11.94	-10.01	1.38	14.66	34.83	-7.88
	J	-18.21	-14.78	-5.88	5.07	21.47	-13.92

盐碱地膜下滴水春灌下土壤盐分淋洗机制

The mechanism of soil salt leaching under spring irrigation with drip water under saline alkali plastic film

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

淋洗方式 Rinse methods	灌水处理 Irrigation treatment	灌水量 Irrigation amount W (m³/667m²)	灌水量合计 Total amount of irrigation (m³/hm²)
春滴灌 Spring dirp irrigation	W₁	50	750
	W₂	75	1 125
	W₃	100	1 500
	W₄	125	1 875
	W₅	150	2 250
常规畦灌 Conventional border irrigation	CK	150	2 250

[1]	罗幼洋, 谢香文, 杨鹏年, 米力夏提·米那多拉, 许咏梅. 盐渍化棉田滴灌技术参数组合优选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(7): 1743-1754.
[2]	王晓艳, 白云岗, 柴仲平, 卢震林, 刘洪波, 肖军, 阿曼尼萨. 休作期冬灌滴灌调控下“干播湿出”对棉花生长及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 302-313.
[3]	扁青永, 付彦博, 祁通, 黄建, 蒲胜海, 孟阿静, 哈丽哈什·依巴提. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花出苗影响因素及保苗措施分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100.
[4]	袁以琳, 颜安, 左筱筱, 侯正清, 张振飞, 肖淑婷, 孙哲, 马梦倩, 赵宇航. 氮肥减量配施生物有机肥对春小麦增产及土壤培肥的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882.
[5]	付鑫法, 吕廷波, 王久龙, 李港强, 宋仁友, 刘一凡. 春灌定额对棉田水温盐分布及棉花苗期生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1336-1344.
[6]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[7]	程少雨, 林涛, 吴凤全, 侯培珂, 张丽莹, 汤秋香. 密度和灌溉定额对76 cm等行距棉田土壤硝态氮分布和氮素利用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 521-531.
[8]	左筱筱, 颜安, 宁松瑞, 杨利, 孙萌, 卢前成. 盐碱麦田生物有机肥促生增产培肥效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2532-2540.
[9]	陈利军, 林涛, 吴凤全, 邵亚杰, 徐彦军, 汤秋香. 种植密度和灌溉定额互作对76 cm等行距机采棉生长发育及产量形成影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2899-2908.
[10]	王亮, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 郭仁松, 林涛, 徐海江, 郑子漂, 崔建平, 田立文. 深松耕作下灌溉定额对棉田水分利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2374-2383.
[11]	程少雨, 林涛, 吴凤全, 侯培珂, 张丽莹, 汤秋香. 密度和灌溉定额互作对76 cm等行距机采棉田水分分布及利用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2341-2351.
[12]	丁峰, 蒲胜海, 吕玉平, 马晓鹏, 沈晓明, 莫彦. 不同灌溉定额对膜下滴灌水稻耗水特征及水分生产效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1577-1584.
[13]	迪力努尔·阿布拉, 黄建, 祁通, 冯耀祖, 王治国. 粉垄深松破障对新疆盐碱地土壤洗盐脱盐效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9): 1754-1761.
[14]	刘东洋, 徐接亮, 张凤华. 不同油菜品种对盐碱土壤理化性质与微生物多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(2): 246-257.
[15]	黄光伟, 翟云龙, 吴全忠, 李玲, 刘太杰, 郭子轩, 孟炎奇, 陈国栋. 磁化次数及磁化灌溉量对棉花生长发育及其产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(12): 2208-2218.