不同化学调节剂对打瓜生理指标的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.06.010

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 1380-1387.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.06.010

• 作物遗传育种·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同化学调节剂对打瓜生理指标的影响

陈友强¹(), 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班¹, 邓超宏¹, 朱力德别克·块什拜², 李欢³, 刘华君¹, 潘竟海¹, 白晓山¹, 沙红¹()

1.新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.福海县农牧技术推广中心,新疆福海 836400
3.阿勒泰地区农技推广中心,新疆阿勒泰 836500

收稿日期:2024-11-21 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-07-29
通信作者: 沙红(1974-),女,江苏启东人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向植物栽培生理,(E-mail)784029791@qq.com
作者简介:陈友强(1969-),男,新疆奎屯人,副研究员,研究方向为籽瓜育种及栽培,(E-mail)1405585001@qq.com
基金资助:
乡村振兴产业发展科技行动项目“打瓜新品种选育及轻简高效栽培技术推广”(2023NC018);新疆西甜瓜产业技术体系“北疆福海综合试验站”(XJARS-06-17);科技援疆项目“打瓜嫁接砧木新品种选育及配套嫁接技术推广应用”(2024E02011)

Effect of different chemical regulators on physiological indicators of seed melon

CHEN Youqiang¹(), Abudukadier Kuerban¹, DENG Chaohong¹, Zhulibieke Kuaishibai², LI Huan³, LIU Huajun¹, PAN Jinghai¹, BAI Xiaoshan¹, SHA Hong¹()

1. Research Institute of Cash Crops, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2. Altay First Farm Co., Ltd., Fuhai Xinjiang 836400, China
3. Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Altay Prefecture, Altay Xinjiang 836500, China

Received:2024-11-21 Published:2025-06-20 Online:2025-07-29
Supported by:
the Science and Technology Action Project for Rural Revitalization and Industrial Development“New Varieties Selection and Promotion of Light and Efficient Cultivation Techniques of Seed Melon”(2023NC018);Xinjiang Water Melon Industrial Technology System "North Xinjiang Fuhai Comprehensive Test Station"(XJARS-06-17);Selection and Breeding of New Melon Varieties with Grafted Rootstocks and Popularization and Application of Matching Grafting Techniques(2024E02011)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同化学生长调节剂对打瓜生理生化指标的影响,为打瓜的生理生化特性、提高产量以及改善株型提供科学依据。【方法】以打瓜品种普通红大片的叶片为材料,利用不同种类化学调节剂,在0.005%和0.01%浓度处理下,分别在3、6、9、12和15 d测定打瓜叶片的生理生化指标。【结果】在不同浓度、种类的化学调节剂处理下,随时间增加各测定指标均呈不同程度的差异变化。0.01%化学生长调节剂处理的MDA含量在3 d时达到最大值。随化学生长调节剂处理浓度和时间的增加,可溶性蛋白含量最高能达到370.2 mg/g。氟乐灵在0.01%浓度处理下,6 d时H₂O₂含量达到峰值,为8.83 μmol/g;且在0.01%氟乐灵处理下,6 d时POD活性显著增加,并达到最大值,1 156.6U/g。在不同化学调节剂、不同浓度处理3~6 d处理时,SOD均有较高的活性,随后下降且变化差异不显著。在0.01%乙烯利处理下,15 d时CAT活性最低为294.7U/g。【结论】经高浓度化学调节剂处理后,打瓜的MDA含量、可溶性蛋白含量、H₂O₂含量以及过氧化物酶活性相较于低浓度处理显著增加。此外,随着处理时间的延长,各项测定指标均差异显著。

关键词: 打瓜; 化学调节剂; 生理生化; 生理生化指标

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of different chemical growth regulators on the physiological and biochemical indicators of the beating melon. A scientific basis for the in-depth study of the physiological and biochemical characteristics of seed melon, the enhancement of its yield as well as the improvement of plant shape. 【Methods】 The physiological and biochemical indexes of seed melon leaves were measured in 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 d with different chemical growth regulators at 0.005% and 0.01% concentration, respectively by using the leaves of beating melon "common red large" as the test material. 【Results】 Under different concentrations and types of chemical growth regulator treatments, all the measured indexes showed different degrees of differential changes with the increase of time. The MDA content of 0.01% chemical growth regulator treatment reached the maximum value at 3 d. With the increase of chemical growth regulator treatment concentration and time, the soluble protein content could reach the maximum value of 370.2 mg/g. The H₂O₂ content of fluralin at 0.01% concentration reached the peak value of 8.83 μmol/g at 6 d; and the POD activity increased significantly and reached the maximum value of 1,156.6 U/g at 6 d under the 0.01% fluralin treatment. The POD activity increased significantly and reached the maximum value of 1,156.6 U/g under different chemical growth regulators and different concentration treatments. SOD had high activity at 3-6 d with different concentrations of chemical regulators, and then decreased with not significantly change. The lowest CAT activity at 15 d was 294.7 U/g under 0.01% vinlide treatment. 【Conclusion】 The MDA content, soluble protein content, H₂O₂ content, and peroxidase activity of beating melon were significantly increased after treatment with high concentrations of chemical regulators compared to low concentrations. In addition, with the prolongation of the treatment time, all the measured indexes show significant differences.

Key words: seed melon; chemical growth regulators; physiology and biochemistry; physiological and biochemical indices

中图分类号:

S651

陈友强, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 邓超宏, 朱力德别克·块什拜, 李欢, 刘华君, 潘竟海, 白晓山, 沙红. 不同化学调节剂对打瓜生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(6): 1380-1387.

CHEN Youqiang, Abudukadier Kuerban, DENG Chaohong, Zhulibieke Kuaishibai, LI Huan, LIU Huajun, PAN Jinghai, BAI Xiaoshan, SHA Hong. Effect of different chemical regulators on physiological indicators of seed melon[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(6): 1380-1387.

图/表 6

图1 不同化学生长调节剂处理下打瓜MDA含量的变化注:0(CK)、3、6、9、12和15 d分别表示化学生长调剂处理0、3、6、9、12和15 d,下同

Fig.1 Changes of different chemical growth regulator treatments on MDA content of beating melon Notes: 0(CK), 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 d indicate 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days of chemical growth regulator treatment, respectively,the same as below

图2 不同化学生长调节剂处理下打瓜可溶性蛋白含量的变化

Fig.2 Changes of different chemical growth regulator treatments on soluble protein content of seed melon

图3 不同化学生长调节剂处理下打瓜H2O2含量的变化

Fig.3 Changes of different chemical growth regulator treatments on H2O2 content of seed melon

图4 不同化学生长调节剂处理下打瓜POD活性的变化

Fig.4 Changes of different chemical growth regulator treatments on POD content of seed melon

图5 不同化学生长调节剂处理下打瓜SOD活性的变化

Fig.5 Changes of different chemical growth regulator treatments on SOD content of seed melon

图6 不同化学生长调节剂处理下打瓜CAT活性的变化

Fig.6 Changes of different chemical growth regulator treatments on CAT content of seed melon

参考文献 11

[12]	蒋伟勤, 宋佳敏, 车阳, 等. 二氢卟吩铁和乙烯利复配喷施对冬小麦产量形成及抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(15): 122-127.
	JIANG Weiqin, SONG Jiamin, CHA Yang, et al. Influences of combined application of iron dihydroporphyrin Influences of combined application of iron dihydroporphyrin[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(15): 122-127.
[13]	周远航, 鲁伟丹, 马小龙, 等. 籽瓜种质资源表型性状鉴定及遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(8): 119-132.
	ZHOU Yuanhang, LU Wedan, MA Xiaolong, et al. Phenotypic characters identification and genetic diversity analysis of seed melon germplasm resources[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2023, 28(8): 119-132.
[14]	赵多勇, 李应彪, 翟金兰, 等. 籽瓜系列产品的开发现状与存在问题[J]. 北方园艺, 2008, (4): 100-102.
	ZHAO Duoyong, LI Yingbiao, ZHAI Jinlan, et al. The Present Status of Research and Problems of Seed-using Watermelon Products[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2008, (4): 100-102.
[15]	田学军, 沈云玫, 沈登荣, 等. 氟吡甲禾灵对白茅保护酶活性和根系活力的影响[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(10): 775-777.
	TIAN Xuejun, SHEN Yunmei, SHEN Dengrong, et al. Effects of Haloxyfop-R-methyl on Protective Enzyme Activity and Root Vigor of Imperata cylindrica[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(10): 775-777.
[16]	陈宏州, 杨敬辉, 张文文, 等. 油菜田日本看麦娘对高效氟吡甲禾灵抗性的生理应答[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(3): 527-532.
	CHEN Hongzhou, YANG Jinghui, ZHANG Wenwen, et al. Physiological responses of Alopecurus japonicus to haloxyfop-R-methyl in oilseed rape fields[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 29(3): 527-532.
[17]	刘贝宁, 陈发兴. 多效唑和乙烯利对西克刺桐花芽分化及成花基因表达的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2024, 39(4):427-437.
	LIU Beining, CHEN Faxing. Effects of Paclobutrazol and Ethephon on the Differentiation of Flower Buds and Expression of Flowering Genes in Erythrina sykesii[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 39(4): 427-437.
[18]	Bienert G P, Moller A L B, Kristiansen K A, et al. Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006, 282(2): 1183-1192.
[19]	侯丽媛, 陈禺怀, 王育川, 等. 干旱胁迫时间对藜麦苗期生理特性的影响及耐旱性评价[J]. 核农学报, 2024, 38(11): 2237-2246.
	HOU Liyuan, CHEN Yuhui, WANG Yuchuan, et al. Influence of Drought Stress Duration on Quinoa Physiological Characteristics and Drought Tolerance Evaluation at Seedling Stage[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 2024, 38(11): 2237-2246.
[20]	陈鹏, 刘奇志. 二斑叶螨为害对草莓叶片H2O2、MDA含量以及部分防御酶活性的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2022, 44(3): 697-703.
	CHEN Peng, LIU Qizhi. Effects of Tetranychus urticae feeding on the H2O2, MDA content and some defensive enzyme activities in strawberry leaves[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2022, 44(3): 697-703.
[21]	Sun N, Chen X F, Zhao H X, et al. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators and Nitrogen Management on Root Lodging Resistance and Grain Yield under High-Density Maize Crops[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(11):2892-2892.
[22]	郝金倩, 王宝驹, 佟静, 等. 外源褪黑素对水培韭菜生长和品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2024, 51(4): 874-858.
	HAO Jinqian, WANG Baoju, TONG Jing, et al. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Growth, Quality and Flavor of Hydroponic Chinese Chive[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(4): 874-858.
[1]	胡力, 王芳梅, 王伟, 等. 新疆打瓜籽油中亚油酸的尿素包合纯化工艺研究[J]. 中国油脂, 2020, 45(9):62-66.
	HU Li, WANG Fangmei, WANG Wei, et al. Purification of linoleic acid in Xinjiang seeding-watermelon seed oil by urea adduction[J]. China Oils and Oils, 2020, 45(9):62-66.
[2]	何伟, 高素燕, 王钦, 等. 内蒙古赤峰地区露地打瓜高效栽培技术[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2024, (11): 24-26.
	HE Wei, GAO Suyan, WANG Qin, et al. Efficient Cultivation Techniques of Open Field Watermelon in Chifeng Area of Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2024, (11): 24-26.
[3]	Yu Q, Zhang P, He Y, et al. Dissipation dynamics and residue of four herbicides in paddy fields using HPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(2): 236.
[4]	Liang Y, Wei L, Hu J. Residues and dietary intake risk assessments of clomazone, fomesafen, haloxyfop-methyl and its metabolite haloxyfop in spring soybean field ecosystem[J]. Food Chemistry, 2021, 360: 129921.
[5]	王艳秋, 张飞, 邹剑秋, 等. 不同除草剂处理下高粱出苗及光合物质生产[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(10):108-115.
	WANG Yanqiu, ZHANG Fei, ZOU Jianqiu, et al. Study on Emergence and Photosynthates Production of Sorghum under Different Herbicides Treatment[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2013, 22(10):108-115.
[6]	杨惠婷, 陈桂信, 胡计红, 等. 二硝基苯胺类除草剂对单头切花菊‘白扇’的倍性诱导效果[J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(11):2190-2196.
	YANG Huiting, CHEN Guixin, HU Keihong, et al. Ploidy Induction Effect of Dinitroaniline Herbicides on the Single-headed Cutting Chrysanthemum 'Iwa-no-hakusen'[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(11):2190-2196.
[7]	李慧, 谭晓琴, 唐茜, 等. 疏花对紫嫣茶树产量及品质成分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7):1602-1615.
	LI Hui, TAN Xiaoqin, TANG Xi, et al. Effects of flower thinning on yield and quality components of Zi Yan tea plants[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7):1602-1615.
[8]	彭廷, 万建伟, 王琳琳, 等. 复配化学调节剂对水稻子粒灌浆充实和蔗糖-淀粉代谢关键基因表达的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2015, 49(5):602-607,615.
	PENG Ting, WAN Jianwei, WANG Linlin, et al. Effect of chemical regulation compounds onrice grain filling, and sucrose-starch metabolism key enzyme related genes expression of rice[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2015, 49(5):602-607,615.
[9]	吴鑫, 谢晓燕, 李元, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌缓解微塑料对玉米生物量和抗氧化酶的毒性[J/OL]. 农业资源与环境学报, 1-15[2024-10-10].
	WU Xin, XIE Xiaoyan, LI Yuan, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviated the toxicities of microplastics to biomass and antioxidant enzymes of Zea mays L.[J/OL]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 1-15[2024-10-10].
[10]	李欣欣, 田阳青, 赵强, 等. 亚磷酸钾复配不同外源物质对化学封顶棉花产量形成的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(7): 1260-1273.
	LI Xinxin, TIAN Yangqing, ZHAO Qiang, et al. Effects of potassium phosphite compounded with different exogenous substances on yield formation in chemically topped cotton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2024, 33(7): 1260-1273.
[11]	王诗琪, 孙约兵, 黄青青, 等. 纳米氧化铜对镉胁迫下小油菜生理生化和重金属累积的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(9): 5204-5213.
	WANG Shiqi, SUN Yuebing, HUANG Qingqing, et al. Effects of Nano-copper Oxide on Physiobiochemical Properties of Brassica chinensis L. and Its Heavy Metal Accumulation Under Cadmium Stress[J]. Environmental Science, 2023, 44(9): 5204-5213.

不同化学调节剂对打瓜生理指标的影响

Effect of different chemical regulators on physiological indicators of seed melon

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 11

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	阿热孜姑·吐逊, 高杰. 干旱胁迫和播种密度对洋葱小鳞茎生理特性及产出鳞茎个数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2211-2222.
[2]	李金瑶, 徐贵青, 王立生, 吕平, 石东方, 郑伟华. 氮肥对头状沙拐枣幼苗抗旱性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2330-2340.
[3]	姚庆, 王杰花, 西尔娜依·阿不都拉, 地力木拉提·吐拉洪, 崔宏亮. 低温胁迫下不同藜麦品种苗期的生理响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1597-1604.
[4]	刘易, 李江涛, 江应红, 杨茹薇, 孙慧, 吴燕. NaCl胁迫下外源亚精胺对马铃薯幼苗生理特征的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 336-344.
[5]	赵康, 程蓉蓉, 庞博, 张梦媛, 张茹, 王勇攀, 杨志宁, 王志, 王红刚, 高文伟. 盐胁迫及复水对棉花叶片生理生化和显微结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2351-2357.
[6]	周小云, 雷斌, 张军高, 梁晶, 龚静云, 周广威, 张少民, 李进. 7.2%萎锈灵和40%拌种灵包衣对棉花幼苗冷胁迫生理生化特征的功效比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 176-183.
[7]	王辉, 郭金成, 宋佳, 张庭军, 何良荣. 高温胁迫下陆地棉GhCIPK6转基因后代生理生化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119.
[8]	钟海霞, 孟阿静, 周晓明, 纪佳慧, 乔江霞, 潘明启, 张付春, 伍新宇. 木纳格葡萄种子发育过程中生理生化指标变化特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 601-607.
[9]	蒲胜海, 王则玉, 丁峰, 王彩风, 刘小利, 马晓鹏, 王涛, 彭银双, 李韵同. 膜下滴灌水稻生理生化特性对灌浆期控水的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2091-2103.
[10]	张玉栋, 吴娜, 蔡晓虎, 史亚辉, 王俊刚. 棉长管蚜危害对棉花生理生化及其相关防御酶的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 2065-2074.
[11]	蔡晓虎, 张玉栋, 韩睿, 史亚辉, 吴娜, 王俊刚. 不同种群密度条件下龙葵对棉花生长及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 2090-2098.
[12]	靳娟,杨磊,樊丁宇,郝庆. 高温胁迫对枣苗生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(3): 439-447.
[13]	安汶铠;严晓红;包秋娟;张富春. 沉默茉莉酸甲基转移酶(GhJMT)基因对棉花幼苗生理指标的影响[J]. , 2017, 54(2): 213-222.
[14]	努尔孜亚;管建华;贾培松;魏鹏;罗影;贾文捷;郝敬喆. 一株抗木霉菌解淀粉芽孢杆菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. , 2016, 53(7): 1297-1302.
[15]	马彦茹;吴湘琳;葛春辉;王新勇. 干旱胁迫条件下施用保水剂对棉花植株生理生化的影响[J]. , 2016, 53(2): 277-282.