

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (4): 829-836.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.006
胡凤仪1(
), 顾元国2, 侯献飞2, 贾东海2, 苗昊翠2, 沈金雄3, 汪天玲2, 黄奕2, 王洁2, 李强2(
), 于月华1(
)
收稿日期:2024-09-06
出版日期:2025-04-20
发布日期:2025-06-20
通信作者:
李强(1980-),男,新疆人,研究员,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为油料作物育种与栽培,(E-mail)lq19820302@126.com;作者简介:胡凤仪(2000-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为油菜耐盐性鉴定,(E-mail)1252265604@qq.com
基金资助:
HU Fengyi1(
), GU Yuanguo2, HOU Xianfei2, JIA Donghai2, MIAO Haocui2, SHEN Jinxiong3, WANG Tianling2, HUANG Yi2, WANG Jie2, LI Qiang2(
), YU Yuehua1(
)
Received:2024-09-06
Published:2025-04-20
Online:2025-06-20
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】探究油菜在新疆盐碱土胁迫下的耐受性,筛选出更符合生产实际的耐盐品种,在新疆盐碱环境下建立油菜耐盐性鉴定体系。【方法】采用盆栽土培法,按T1、T2、T3、T4和T5比例的新疆南疆盐土,筛选出的10份耐盐性强油菜种质资源,鉴定其芽期和全生育期的耐盐性,确定盐碱土下对油菜筛选耐盐的最佳浓度,使用该浓度盐土鉴定300份油菜品种,测定其发芽率,根据生长情况综合筛选出耐盐性强的6份油菜种质资源,按不同比例对其进行耐盐梯度鉴定,分析其离子含量,以盐土下油菜的发芽率将品种耐盐性分类。【结果】确定油菜盐土的耐盐鉴定浓度,按此浓度根据发芽率将300份油菜分为强、中、弱和极弱4类,其中10份耐盐品种,75份材料中等耐盐品种,91份敏盐品种,24份极敏盐品种。并根据全生育期的观察确定6份耐盐性并根据全生育期的观察确定6份耐盐性较强的品种,对其进行全生育期耐盐鉴定试验,根据F=0.4 Z+0.3 H +0.3 Y对其耐盐性进行综合评价,CJLZS219266、CJLZS219310的Z<0.3,为Ⅳ级,盐碱敏感性,CJLZS219346、CJLZS219181、CJLZS219172,为Ⅲ级,不耐盐碱;而CJLZS219368的F值>0.7,为Ⅰ级耐盐碱性。【结论】油菜在新疆盐土下萌发期耐盐性鉴定的最适宜浓度为T3浓度,明确其离子含量,以盐土下油菜的发芽率进行品种耐盐性分类。
中图分类号:
胡凤仪, 顾元国, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 苗昊翠, 沈金雄, 汪天玲, 黄奕, 王洁, 李强, 于月华. 利用新疆盐碱土建立油菜耐盐性鉴定体系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(4): 829-836.
HU Fengyi, GU Yuanguo, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, MIAO Haocui, SHEN Jinxiong, WANG Tianling, HUANG Yi, WANG Jie, LI Qiang, YU Yuehua. Establishing a rapeseed salt tolerance identification system by using saline-alkali soil in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 829-836.
| 原样品编号 Original sample number | T1 | T2 | T3 | 南疆盐碱土 Southern Xinjiang saline alkali soil |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH值 pH value | 7.39 | 8.24 | 8.31 | 8.81 |
| 水溶性盐分 Water- soluble salts(g/kg) | 10.46 | 21.76 | 24.50 | 94.86 |
| 阳离子交换量 Cation exchange capacity (cmol/kg) | 41.23 | 31.76 | 37.98 | 7.46 |
| Cl- (g/kg) | 1.96 | 3.72 | 6.12 | 1.41 |
| S (g/kg) | 5.91 | 5.87 | 3.76 | 9.64 |
| C (g/kg) | <检出限 | <检出限 | <检出限 | <检出限 |
| HC (g/kg) | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.32 |
| K+ (g/kg) | 0.90 | 0.72 | 1.59 | 0.90 |
| Na+ (g/kg) | 1.04 | 2.47 | 7.37 | 26.35 |
| Ca2+ (g/kg) | 2.58 | 2.46 | 2.67 | 2.93 |
| Mg2+ (g/kg) | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.85 | 3.18 |
表1 2022年盐土离子浓度
Tab.1 Saline soil ion concentration in 2022
| 原样品编号 Original sample number | T1 | T2 | T3 | 南疆盐碱土 Southern Xinjiang saline alkali soil |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH值 pH value | 7.39 | 8.24 | 8.31 | 8.81 |
| 水溶性盐分 Water- soluble salts(g/kg) | 10.46 | 21.76 | 24.50 | 94.86 |
| 阳离子交换量 Cation exchange capacity (cmol/kg) | 41.23 | 31.76 | 37.98 | 7.46 |
| Cl- (g/kg) | 1.96 | 3.72 | 6.12 | 1.41 |
| S (g/kg) | 5.91 | 5.87 | 3.76 | 9.64 |
| C (g/kg) | <检出限 | <检出限 | <检出限 | <检出限 |
| HC (g/kg) | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.32 |
| K+ (g/kg) | 0.90 | 0.72 | 1.59 | 0.90 |
| Na+ (g/kg) | 1.04 | 2.47 | 7.37 | 26.35 |
| Ca2+ (g/kg) | 2.58 | 2.46 | 2.67 | 2.93 |
| Mg2+ (g/kg) | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.85 | 3.18 |
| 材料名称 Material name | 原名称 Original name | T1(%) | T2(%) | T3(%) | T4(%) | T5(%) | Z |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNYQD222 001 | caibhav/自交4-GYG | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 0.00 |
| CNYQD222 002 | 威宁芥菜12/自交2-LZS | 100 | 100 | 83 | 50 | 0 | 0.34 |
| CNYQD222 003 | 广德野芥/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 67 | 16 | 0 | 0.39 |
| CNYQD222 004 | JR042/自交3-GYG | 100 | 100 | 67 | 16 | 0 | 0.39 |
| CNYQD222 005 | Zem-2/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 0.00 |
| CNYQD222 006 | CR86(Doneckaja4)/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 50 | 33 | 16 | 0.75 |
| CNYQD222 007 | Ekla/自交3-GYG | 100 | 83 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| CNYQD222 008 | PI458929(Leth22A)/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 67 | 16 | 16 | 0.39 |
| CNYQD222 009 | 阿克苏油菜/自交5-GYG | 100 | 83 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 1.00 |
| CNYQD222 010 | 拜城黄油菜 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 0.00 |
表2 不同处理下参试材料的出苗率及出苗率标准化情况
Tab.2 The emergence rate and emergence rate standardization of the test materials under different treatments
| 材料名称 Material name | 原名称 Original name | T1(%) | T2(%) | T3(%) | T4(%) | T5(%) | Z |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNYQD222 001 | caibhav/自交4-GYG | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 0.00 |
| CNYQD222 002 | 威宁芥菜12/自交2-LZS | 100 | 100 | 83 | 50 | 0 | 0.34 |
| CNYQD222 003 | 广德野芥/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 67 | 16 | 0 | 0.39 |
| CNYQD222 004 | JR042/自交3-GYG | 100 | 100 | 67 | 16 | 0 | 0.39 |
| CNYQD222 005 | Zem-2/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 0.00 |
| CNYQD222 006 | CR86(Doneckaja4)/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 50 | 33 | 16 | 0.75 |
| CNYQD222 007 | Ekla/自交3-GYG | 100 | 83 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| CNYQD222 008 | PI458929(Leth22A)/自交3-LZS | 100 | 100 | 67 | 16 | 16 | 0.39 |
| CNYQD222 009 | 阿克苏油菜/自交5-GYG | 100 | 83 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 1.00 |
| CNYQD222 010 | 拜城黄油菜 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 材料名称 Material name | 原名称 Original name | T1 | T2 | T3 | Z |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJLZS219368 | CR 2652/自交1 | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.750 | 0.750 |
| CJLZS219266 | CR 79 (Blaze)/自交1 | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.250 | 0.250 |
| CJLZS219310 | 曲沟大黄油菜籽/自交3-LZS | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.250 | 0.250 |
| CJLZS219181 | PI181026/自交4-LZS | 1.000 | 0.750 | 0.500 | 0.500 |
| CJLZS219346 | 石庄小芥/自交3-GYG | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.500 | 0.375 |
| CJLZS219172 | 18WHZ6-10 | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.375 | 0.300 |
表3 不同浓度盐碱土下参试材料的出苗率及出苗率标准化情况
Tab.3 The emergence rate and emergence rate standardization of the test materials under different concentrations of saline-alkali soil
| 材料名称 Material name | 原名称 Original name | T1 | T2 | T3 | Z |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJLZS219368 | CR 2652/自交1 | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.750 | 0.750 |
| CJLZS219266 | CR 79 (Blaze)/自交1 | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.250 | 0.250 |
| CJLZS219310 | 曲沟大黄油菜籽/自交3-LZS | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.250 | 0.250 |
| CJLZS219181 | PI181026/自交4-LZS | 1.000 | 0.750 | 0.500 | 0.500 |
| CJLZS219346 | 石庄小芥/自交3-GYG | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.500 | 0.375 |
| CJLZS219172 | 18WHZ6-10 | 1.000 | 0.813 | 0.375 | 0.300 |
| 材料名称 Material name | T1 | T2 | T3 | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJLZS219368 | 37.200 | 21.280 | 20.920 | 0.980 |
| CJLZS219266 | 37.570 | 30.430 | 30.000 | 0.940 |
| CJLZS219310 | 31.180 | 24.670 | 9.330 | 0.300 |
| CJLZS219181 | 73.830 | 66.670 | 18.080 | 0.128 |
| CJLZS219346 | 68.300 | 65.950 | 55.720 | 0.190 |
| CJLZS219172 | 76.380 | 70.780 | 43.210 | 0.170 |
表4 不同浓度盐碱土下参试材料株高及株高的标准化情况
Tab.4 The plant height and plant height standardization of the test materials under different concentrations of saline-alkali soil
| 材料名称 Material name | T1 | T2 | T3 | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJLZS219368 | 37.200 | 21.280 | 20.920 | 0.980 |
| CJLZS219266 | 37.570 | 30.430 | 30.000 | 0.940 |
| CJLZS219310 | 31.180 | 24.670 | 9.330 | 0.300 |
| CJLZS219181 | 73.830 | 66.670 | 18.080 | 0.128 |
| CJLZS219346 | 68.300 | 65.950 | 55.720 | 0.190 |
| CJLZS219172 | 76.380 | 70.780 | 43.210 | 0.170 |
| 材料名称 Material name | T1 | T2 | T3 | Y | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJLZS219368 | 1.785 | 1.683 | 1.542 | 0.419 | 0.719 |
| CJLZS219266 | 3.533 | 2.195 | 2.030 | 0.891 | 0.650 |
| CJLZS219310 | 3.066 | 1.939 | 1.806 | 0.895 | 0.458 |
| CJLZS219181 | 1.432 | 1.037 | 0.557 | 0.451 | 0.374 |
| CJLZS219346 | 0.867 | 0.820 | 0.520 | 0.135 | 0.246 |
| CJLZS219172 | 2.985 | 1.588 | 1.141 | 0.758 | 0.398 |
表5 不同浓度盐碱土下参试材料的产量、产量标准化情况及综合评价
Tab.5 The yield, yield standardization and comprehensive evaluation of the test materials under different concentrations of saline-alkali soil
| 材料名称 Material name | T1 | T2 | T3 | Y | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJLZS219368 | 1.785 | 1.683 | 1.542 | 0.419 | 0.719 |
| CJLZS219266 | 3.533 | 2.195 | 2.030 | 0.891 | 0.650 |
| CJLZS219310 | 3.066 | 1.939 | 1.806 | 0.895 | 0.458 |
| CJLZS219181 | 1.432 | 1.037 | 0.557 | 0.451 | 0.374 |
| CJLZS219346 | 0.867 | 0.820 | 0.520 | 0.135 | 0.246 |
| CJLZS219172 | 2.985 | 1.588 | 1.141 | 0.758 | 0.398 |
图2 不同浓度盐胁迫下油菜品种生长差异 注:每盆盐碱土浓度从左至右依次为T1、T2、T3、T4和T5的浓度,显示在盛花期时不同浓度盐胁迫下油菜生长有显著差异,浓度越高,油菜生长速率越低
Fig.2 Growth differences of rapeseed varieties under different concentrations of salt stress Notes:The concentrations of saline alkali soil in each pot from left to right ave T1、T2、T3、T4 and T5,there are significant differences in the growth of rapeseed under different concentrations of salt stress during the peak flowering period,the higher the concentration,the slower the growth rafe of rapeseed
| [1] | 王斌, 马兴旺, 单娜娜, 等. 新疆盐碱地土壤改良剂的选择与应用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014, 28(7): 111-115. |
| WANG Bin, MA Xingwang, SHAN Nana, et al. The selection and application of saline alkali soil amendment in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2014, 28(7): 111-115. | |
| [2] | 田长彦, 买文选, 赵振勇. 新疆干旱区盐碱地生态治理关键技术研究[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7064-7068. |
| TIAN Changyan, MAI Wenxuan, ZHAO Zhenyong. Study on key technologies of ecological management of saline alkali land in arid area of Xinjiang[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7064-7068. | |
| [3] | 魏婷婷, 马延东, 郑飞敏. 新疆土壤盐碱化现状及其综合治理对策[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(10): 107-110. |
| WEI Tingting, Ma Yandongm, Zheng Feimin. The present situation and comprehensive treatment of soil salinization in Xinjiang[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 26(10): 107-110. | |
| [4] | 胡明芳, 田长彦, 赵振勇, 等. 新疆盐碱地成因及改良措施研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(10): 111-117. |
| HU Mingfang, TIAN Changyan, ZHAO Zhenyong, et al. Salinization causes and research progress of technologies improving saline-alkali soil in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(10): 111-117. | |
| [5] | 邵华伟, 孙九胜, 胡伟, 等. 新疆盐碱地分布特点和成因及改良利用技术研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2014,(11): 160-164. |
| SHAO Huawei, SUN Jiusheng, HU Wei, et al. Research progress on distribution characteristics, causes and improved utilization technology of saline-alkali land in Xinjiang[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014,(11): 160-164. | |
| [6] | 殷艳, 尹亮, 张学昆, 等. 我国油菜产业高质量发展现状和对策[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8): 1-7. |
|
YIN Yan, YIN Liang, ZHANG Xuekun, et al. Status and countermeasure of the high-quality development of rapeseed industry in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 1-7.
DOI |
|
| [7] |
黄贺, 闫蕾, 吕艳, 等. 甘蓝型油菜发芽期低温耐性的评价与材料筛选[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41(5): 723-734.
DOI |
|
HUANG He, YAN Lei, LYU Yan, et al. Screening and evaluation of low temperature tolerance of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) at germination stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2019, 41(5): 723-734.
DOI |
|
| [8] |
严中琪, 朱家骝, 吴国泉. 5个油菜品种耐盐性试验及盐碱地改良应用[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(12): 2407-2409.
DOI |
| YAN Zhongqi, ZHU Jialiu, WU Guoquan. Salt tolerance test and application of 5 rapeseed varieties in saline alkali land improvement[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 62(12): 2407-2409. | |
| [9] | 范倩玉, 李晋, 刘振华, 等. 饲用油菜对盐碱地土壤改良效果探究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(11): 71-78. |
| FAN Qianyu, LI Jin, LIU Zhenhua, et al. Improvement effect of feed rapeseed on saline-alkali soil[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(11): 71-78. | |
| [10] | 陈子岩. 水稻耐盐性和耐旱性鉴定体系构建及耐逆种质的筛选[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020. |
| CHEN Ziyan. Construction of identification system for salt tolerance and drought tolerance of rice and screening of stress tolerance germplasm[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020. | |
| [11] | 黄雅婕. 陆地棉耐盐碱评价体系的建立[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021. |
| HUANG Yajie. Establishment of evaluation system for saline-alkali tolerance of upland cotton[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021. | |
| [12] | 杨紫贻. 紫花苜蓿耐盐评价体系的建立及耐盐机理研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2021. |
| YANG Ziyi. Establishment of evaluation system of alfalfa salt tolerance and study on salt tolerance mechanism[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2021. | |
| [13] |
李枭, 郭栋良, 李恭泽, 等. 亚麻萌发期耐盐鉴定体系优化及150份种质耐盐性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1438-1449.
DOI |
|
LI Xiao, GUO Dongliang, LI Gongze, et al. Optimization of salt tolerance identification system at germination stage of flax and comprehensive assessment of salt tolerance of 150 germplasms[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1438-1449.
DOI |
|
| [14] | 李玉骁, 汪磊, 汪魏, 等. 向日葵种质资源的耐盐性评价[J/OL]. 植物遗传资源学报:1-14[2024-01-17]. |
| LI Yuxiao, WANG Lei, WANG Wei, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance of sunflower germplasm resources[J/OL]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources:1-14[2024-01-17]. | |
| [15] | 薛天源, 鲁金春子, 何思晓, 等. 286份甘蓝型油菜种质苗期耐盐碱性综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(3): 356-372. |
| XUE Tianyuan, LU Jinchunzi, HE Sixiao, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on saline-alkali tolerance of 286 Brassica napus germplasm at seedling stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2024, 25(3): 356-372. | |
| [16] |
胡凤仪, 侯献飞, 于月华, 等. 479份芥菜型油菜种质资源萌发期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2023, 45(6): 1174-1184.
DOI |
|
HU Fengyi, HOU Xianfei, YU Yuehua, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of 479 Brassica juncea germplasm resources at germination stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2023, 45(6): 1174-1184.
DOI |
|
| [17] | 王静, 葛均筑, 郑志广, 等. 盐分胁迫对油菜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2019, 25(11): 17-21, 33. |
| WANG Jing, GE Junzhu, ZHENG Zhiguang, et al. Effects of salt stress on rapeseed germination and seedling growth[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 25(11): 17-21, 33. | |
| [18] | 黄镇, 杨瑞阁, 徐爱遐, 等. 盐胁迫对3大类型油菜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(7): 49-53. |
| HUANG Zhen, YANG Ruige, XU Aixia, et al. Effects of saline stress on seed germination and seedlings properties of three types' rapeseeds[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 38(7): 49-53. | |
| [19] | 李菡, 赵玉雪, 周小可, 等. 模拟海水胁迫对小麦萌发的影响[J/OL]. 作物杂志,1-8[2024-01-03]. |
| LI Han, ZHAO Yuxue, ZHOU Xiaoke, et al. Effects of simulated seawater stress on wheat germination[J/OL]. Crops,1-8[2024-01-03] | |
| [20] | 张文博, 刘芸希, 李国铭, 等. 9份番茄材料种子萌发期耐盐碱性评价[J]. 种子, 2023, 42(5): 26-32. |
| ZHANG Wenbo, LIU Yunxi, LI Guoming, et al. Evaluation of saline-alkaline tolerance of 9 tomato materials during seed germination[J]. Seed, 2023, 42(5): 26-32. | |
| [21] | 王志恒, 黄思麒, 李成虎, 等. 13种藜麦萌发期抗逆性综合评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(1): 25-36. |
| WANG Zhiheng, HUANG Siqi, LI Chenghu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of stress resistance during germination of 13 quinoa species[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(1): 25-36. | |
| [22] | 毛恋, 芦建国, 江海燕. 植物响应盐碱胁迫的机制[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(10): 3441-3448. |
| MAO Lian, LU Jianguo, JIANG Haiyan. Mechanisms of plant responses to salt-alkali stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(10): 3441-3448. | |
| [23] | 王珊珊, 钟雪梅, 文莎, 等. 甘蓝型油菜萌发期耐盐碱性高效鉴定及抗性资源筛选[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2023, 45(6):1166-1173. |
|
WANG Shanshan, ZHONG Xuemei, WEN Sha, et al. Efficient identification of saline-alkaline tolerance and screening of resistant resources in germination stage of Brassica napus[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2023, 45(6):1166-1173.
DOI |
|
| [24] |
万何平, 余忆, 陈敬东, 等. 甘蓝型油菜耐盐碱性快速鉴定方法与应用[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2023, 45(4): 776-784.
DOI |
|
WAN Heping, YU Yi, CHENG Jindong, et al. Rapid identification method and application of saline-alkaline tolerance in Brassica napus[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2023, 45(4): 776-784.
DOI |
|
| [25] |
王萌, 刘文君, 鲁雪莉, 等. 大豆种质资源萌发期耐盐性评价和耐盐机理解析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(26): 8-16.
DOI |
|
WANG Meng, LIU Wenjun, LU Xueli, et al. Salt tolerance evaluation and salt tolerance mechanism analysis of soybean germplasm resources at germination stage[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 8-16.
DOI |
|
| [26] | 王兴州, 时晓磊, 张恒, 等. 引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(06): 1353-1362. |
| WANG Xinzhou, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, et al. Salt tolerance identification and evaluation of introduced spring wheat varieties at germination stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(06): 1353-1362. | |
| [27] | 李晓婷, 胡畅丽, 李鑫, 等. 花生萌发期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 花生学报, 2022, 51(4): 35-43. |
| LI Xiaoting, HU Changli, LI Xin, et al. Identification and Sreening of Salt-TolerancePeanut Cultivars Dring GerminationSatge[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2022, 51(4): 35-43. |
| [1] | 李明, 郑焕斌, 王明晶, 赵北方, 张斯童, 杨素欣. 盐胁迫对大豆苗期根系的影响及GWAS分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 627-643. |
| [2] | 王贺亚, 罗静静, 孟玲, 李怀胜, 艾海峰, 贾东海. 基于主成分和聚类分析综合评价塔额盆地油菜新品种(系)[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 118-128. |
| [3] | 张帆, 陈晓露, 王洁, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 顾元国, 苗昊翠, 李强. 混合盐碱胁迫对花生种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182. |
| [4] | 董志多, 徐菲, 付秋萍, 黄建, 祁通, 孟阿静, 付彦博, 开赛尔·库尔班. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844. |
| [5] | 刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 王冀川. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581. |
| [6] | 张福林, 李宁, 刘宇翔, 陈怡佳, 余庆辉, 闫会转. 外源2,4-表油菜素内酯及褪黑素对樱桃番茄果实品质和果皮形态结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1738-1747. |
| [7] | 康民泰, 杜孝敬, 张燕红, 陈玉环, 文孝荣, 唐福森, 赵志强, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 新疆盐渍区水稻品种生育表现与耐盐性筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 591-598. |
| [8] | 张伟, 杨国慧, 于辉. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对干旱胁迫下西瓜幼苗生长及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 615-622. |
| [9] | 赵康, 程蓉蓉, 庞博, 张梦媛, 张茹, 王勇攀, 杨志宁, 王志, 王红刚, 高文伟. 盐胁迫及复水对棉花叶片生理生化和显微结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2351-2357. |
| [10] | 杨寒珺, 黄星宇, 王旭哲, 张凤华, 鲁为华, 张凡凡. 田间晾晒时间对饲用油菜发酵品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1433-1441. |
| [11] | 张燕红, 侯天钰, 巴音花, 赵彩月, 吕玉平, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 赵志强, 李冬, 杜孝敬, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 水稻重组自交系群体芽期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1041-1049. |
| [12] | 哈力旦·依克热木, 刘娜, 刘联正, 周安定, 姜奇彦, 达买力江·合孜尔, 曹俊梅, 张新忠. 小麦近缘种芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1118-1126. |
| [13] | 陈丽靓, 鲁倩君, 马媛媛, 刘迎, 赵宝龙, 孙军利. 不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 880-888. |
| [14] | 陈英花, 白如霄, 王娟, 范守杰, 张新疆, 危常州. 叶面喷施油菜素内酯和亚精胺对甜菜生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 698-705. |
| [15] | 杨世英, 马玉娥, 贾斌鑫, 华震宇, 沈琦, 刘峰娟, 王成. 油菜素内酯对甜瓜农药残留的降解作用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2541-2550. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||