新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (7): 1657-1665.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.07.012
• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
侯献飞1(), 李强1(
), 苗昊翠1(
), 贾东海1, 顾元国1, 买买提依明·斯马依1, 崔福洋2
收稿日期:
2023-11-30
出版日期:
2024-07-20
发布日期:
2024-09-04
通信作者:
李强(1980-),男,新疆人,研究员,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为油料作物育种与栽培,(E-mail)lq19820302@126.com;作者简介:
侯献飞(1989- ),男,甘肃庆阳人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为油料作物遗传育种,(E-mail)hou544805196@163.com
基金资助:
HOU Xianfei1(), LI Qiang1(
), MIAO haocui1(
), JIA Donghai1, GU Yuanguo1, Maimaiyiming Simayi1, CUI Fuyang2
Received:
2023-11-30
Published:
2024-07-20
Online:
2024-09-04
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究棉花-花生轮作模式下土壤养分及作物产量变化规律,为新疆绿洲农区产业结构调整提供一定的理论依据。【方法】试验为长期定位试验,设棉花-花生、花生-棉花、花生-花生(对照)、棉花-棉花4个处理(对照),于各轮作作物收获后取土样,测定0~20 cm,20~40 cm,40~60 cm土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、全钾、水解氮、有效磷、速效钾含量。【结果】棉花-花生轮作下,0~20 cm土壤有效磷含量最高,是棉花连作的2倍左右,且土壤速效钾含量明显高于棉花连作,在0~40 cm土层花生连作的土壤全氮含量最高,棉花-花生轮作的土壤水解氮含量最高;棉花-花生轮作的花生、棉花产量均高于连作棉花、连作花生,且棉花-花生轮作,较花生-花生连作的花生增产16.33%;2017年花生-棉花轮作下,棉花产量较棉花轮作增产8.2%。【结论】棉花-花生轮作模式可以提高连作棉田土壤肥力,提高棉花和花生产量。
中图分类号:
侯献飞, 李强, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 买买提依明·斯马依, 崔福洋. 棉花-花生轮作模式对土壤养分及其产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1657-1665.
HOU Xianfei, LI Qiang, MIAO haocui, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, Maimaiyiming Simayi, CUI Fuyang. Effects of cotton-peanut rotation on the soil physicochemical properties and the yield of crop[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1657-1665.
处理 Treatments | 2016年 | 2017年 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小区产量 Plot yield (kg/15m2) | 折合单产 Yield per mu (kg/667m2) | 小区产量 Plot yield (kg/15m2) | 折合单产 Yield per mu (kg/667m2) | |||||
棉花-棉花 Cotton-Cotton | 8.25 | 9.05 | 8.65 | 384.45b | 7.38 | 7.58 | 7.48 | 311.67b |
花生-棉花 Peanut-Cotton | 7.75 | 9.80 | 8.78 | 390.00b | 8.20 | 7.98 | 8.09 | 337.09b |
花生-花生 Peanut - Peanut | 8.10 | 10.28 | 9.19 | 408.34b | 8.10 | 11.03 | 9.56 | 425.00b |
棉花-花生 Cotton-Peanut | 10.80 | 10.58 | 10.69 | 475.00a | 9.68 | 10.20 | 9.94 | 441.67a |
表1 棉花-花生轮作产量表现
Tab.1 Economic yield performance of Cotton-Peanut rotation
处理 Treatments | 2016年 | 2017年 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小区产量 Plot yield (kg/15m2) | 折合单产 Yield per mu (kg/667m2) | 小区产量 Plot yield (kg/15m2) | 折合单产 Yield per mu (kg/667m2) | |||||
棉花-棉花 Cotton-Cotton | 8.25 | 9.05 | 8.65 | 384.45b | 7.38 | 7.58 | 7.48 | 311.67b |
花生-棉花 Peanut-Cotton | 7.75 | 9.80 | 8.78 | 390.00b | 8.20 | 7.98 | 8.09 | 337.09b |
花生-花生 Peanut - Peanut | 8.10 | 10.28 | 9.19 | 408.34b | 8.10 | 11.03 | 9.56 | 425.00b |
棉花-花生 Cotton-Peanut | 10.80 | 10.58 | 10.69 | 475.00a | 9.68 | 10.20 | 9.94 | 441.67a |
[1] | 梁亚军, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 等. 新疆2019年棉花产业情况概述及存在问题与策略[J]. 棉花科学, 2020, 42(1): 14-20. |
LIANG Yajun, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, et al. Overview of cotton industry situation and existing problems and strategies in Xinjiang in 2019[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2020, 42(1): 14-20. | |
[2] | 杨菲, 刘霞, 李海涛, 等. 不同花生棉花间作配比下的土壤养分、作物产量和收益研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(8): 33-36. |
YANG Fei, LIU Xia, LI Haitao, et al. Effects of peanut-cotton intercropping ratio on soil nutrient, crop yield and income[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53(8): 33-36. | |
[3] | Bi Y L, Zhou H L. Changes in peanut canopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics induced by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in a nutrient-poor environment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 14832. |
[4] | 唐朝辉, 郭峰, 张佳蕾, 等. 甘薯花生轮作对花生生理及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(6): 1002-1009. |
TANG Zhaohui, GUO Feng, ZHANG Jialei, et al. Effect of sweet potato and peanut rotation on physiological characteristics and yield and quality of peanut[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2020, 42(6): 1002-1009.
DOI |
|
[5] | 范业赓, 陈荣发, 闫海锋, 等. 甘蔗轮作青饲玉米和花生对甘蔗生长和土壤性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (1): 104-111. |
FAN Yegeng, CHEN Rongfa, YAN Haifeng, et al. Effects of sugarcane rotation green fodder corn and peanut on sugarcane growth and soil properties[J]. Crops, 2021, (1): 104-111. | |
[6] | 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王虹霏, 等. 秸秆还田对东北半干旱区玉米‖花生轮作系统土壤水热特性及作物产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4): 86-95. |
YAO Fanyun, CAO Yujun, WANG Hongfei, et al. Effects of straw returning on soil hydro-thermal properties and crop yield of Maize‖Peanut rotation system in semi-arid area of Northeast China[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(4): 86-95. | |
[7] | Zhao J, Yang Y D, Zhang K, et al. Does crop rotation yield more in China? A meta-analysis[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 245: 107659. |
[8] |
李银水, 余常兵, 谢立华, 等. 氮钾肥运筹对花生——油菜轮作制作物产量及养分效率的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2016, 38(6): 817-823.
DOI |
LI Yinshui, YU Changbing, XIE Lihua, et al. Effect of different nitrogen and potassium fertilizers application allocation on yields and nutrient efficiency in peanut-rapeseed rotation system[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2016, 38(6): 817-823.
DOI |
|
[9] |
温延臣, 李海燕, 袁亮, 等. 长期定位施肥对潮土剖面养分分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4460-4469.
DOI |
WEN Yanchen, LI Haiyan, YUAN Liang, et al. Effect of long-term fertilization on nutrient distribution of fluvo-aquic soil profile[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4460-4469.
DOI |
|
[10] |
朱梓弘, 朱同彬, 杨霖, 等. 中国土壤碱解氮含量与影响因子的空间关系研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(11): 2199-2207.
DOI |
ZHU Zihong, ZHU Tongbin, YANG Lin, et al. The spatial relationship between soil alkeline-nitrogen content and environmental factors in China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(11): 2199-2207. | |
[11] | 张苏芮, 李一鸣. 小麦—玉米轮作体系下长期秸秆还田对土壤养分含量的影响综述[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020,(7): 189, 192. |
ZHANG Surui, LI Yiming. Review on the effect of long-term straw returning to field on soil nutrient content under wheat-maize rotation system[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020,(7): 189, 192. | |
[12] | 郑永美, 周丽梅, 郑亚萍, 等. 花生主要碳代谢指标与根瘤固氮能力的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(1): 75-86. |
ZHENG Yongmei, ZHOU Limei, ZHENG Yaping, et al. Relationship between carbon metabolism indices of peanut leaves and nitrogen fixation ability of nodules[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(1): 75-86. | |
[13] | 田丽彬, 刘译阳, 张佳蕾, 等. 花生结瘤起始因子基因鉴定及其对氮肥的响应[J]. 花生学报, 2020, 49(3): 1-7. |
TIAN Libin, LIU Yiyang, ZHANG Jialei, et al. Identification of peanut nodule inception and its response to nitrogen fertilizer[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2020, 49(3): 1-7. | |
[14] | 张晓娜, 陈平, 杜青, 等. 玉米/大豆、玉米/花生间作对作物氮素吸收及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(8): 1183-1194. |
ZHANG Xiaona, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, et al. Effects of maize/soybean and maize/peanut intercropping systems on crops nitrogen uptake and nodulation nitrogen fixation[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(8): 1183-1194. | |
[15] | Feiziene D, Feiza V, Povilaitis V, et al. Soil sustainability changes in organic crop rotations with diverse crop species and the share of legumes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science, 2016, 66(1): 36-51. |
[16] |
翁颖, 许映君, 崔萌萌, 等. 菜用大豆不同施肥处理试验初报[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(12): 2295-2297.
DOI |
WENG Ying, Xu Yingjun, Cui Mengmeng, et al. Preliminary report of fertilization treatments on vegetable soybean[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 59(12): 2295-2297. | |
[17] | 庞泰春. 不同施钾水平对大豆生长及产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017,(15): 7-8. |
PANG Taichun. Effects of different potassium application level on growth and yield of soybean[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,(15): 7-8. | |
[18] | 韩晓增, 胡国华, 邹文秀. 东北地区不同轮作方式下大豆产量对施钾的响应[J]. 土壤与作物, 2014, 3(4): 157-161. |
HAN Xiaozeng, HU Guohua, ZOU Wenxiu. The response of soybean grain yield to potassium fertilization under different crop rotations in black soil region of Northeast China[J]. Soil and Crop, 2014, 3(4): 157-161. | |
[19] | West T O, Post W M. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002, 66(6): 1930-1946. |
[20] | 宋祥云, 宋春燕, 柳新伟, 等. 小麦玉米轮作条件下不同生物质炭对土壤腐殖物质的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(3): 610-618. |
SONG Xiangyun, SONG Chunyan, LIU Xinwei, et al. Effects of application of biochar on soil humic substances in cropland under wheat-corn rotation system[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(3): 610-618. | |
[21] | 马欣, 韩宝吉, 张丽梅, 等. 花生-油菜轮作模式下硼肥及其后效对作物产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(6): 861-865, 888. |
MA Xin, HAN Baoji, ZHANG Limei, et al. Residual effectiveness of different boron fertilizers on seed yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) for rotated oilseed rape (Brassica napus)[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2018, 40(6): 861-865, 888.
DOI |
|
[22] | Zuber S, Behnke G, Nafziger E, et al. Carbon and nitrogen content of soil organic matter and microbial biomass under long-term crop rotation and tillage in Illinois, USA[J]. Agriculture, 2018, 8(3): 37. |
[23] | Campbell C A, Janzen H H, Paustian K, et al. Carbon storage in soils of the North American great Plains: effect of cropping frequency[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2005, 97(2): 349-363. |
[24] | 杨滨娟, 孙丹平, 张颖睿, 等. 长江中游地区水旱复种轮作模式资源利用率比较研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(8):1197-1205. |
YANG Binjuan, SUN Danping, ZHANG Yingrui, et al. Comparative study on resource utilization rate of flood drought multiple cropping rotation model in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(8): 1197-1205. | |
[25] | 郭晓霞, 刘景辉, 田露, 等. 免耕轮作对内蒙古地区农田贮水特性和作物产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(8):1504-1512. |
GUO Xiaoxia, LIU Jinghui, TIAN Lu, et al. Effects of no tillage rotation on farmland water storage characteristics and crop yield in Inner Mongolia[J]. Crops, 2012, 38(8): 1504-1512. | |
[26] |
郭星宇, 王浩, 于琦, 等. 耕作对渭北旱塬小麦-玉米轮作田土壤水分和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(14): 2977-2990.
DOI |
GUO Xingyu, WANG Hao, YU Qi, et al. Effects of tillage on soil moisture and yield of wheat-maize rotation field in Weibei upland plateau[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(14): 2977-2990.
DOI |
|
[27] | 张国伟, 王晓婧, 杨长琴, 等. 前茬作物秸秆还田下轮作模式和施肥对大豆产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(9): 1493-1501. |
ZHANG Guowei, WANG Xiaojing, YANG Changqin, et al. Effects of rotational pattern and fertilization application on soybean yield under straws returning of preceding crop[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(9): 1493-1501. | |
[28] | 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 等. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下品种匹配与资源效率研究[J/OL]. 作物学报, 2021, 7 (1): 1-17. |
YAN Yan, ZHANG Yudan, LIU Churong, et al. Study on variety matching and resource efficiency under the "double late" planting mode of winter wheat summer maize rotation [J / OL]. Crops, 2021, 7(1): 1-17. | |
[29] | Varvel G E. Monoculture and rotation system effects on precipitation use efficiency of corn[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1994, 86(1): 204-208. |
[30] | 韩丽娜, 丁静, 韩清芳, 等. 黄土高原区草粮(油)翻耕轮作的土壤水分及作物产量效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(24): 129-137. |
HAN Lina, DING Jing, HAN Qingfang, et al. Effects of soil moisture and crop yield on grass-grain (oil) tillage rotation in Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(24): 129-137. | |
[31] |
Schumacher L A, Grabau Z J, Wright D L, et al. Nematicide influence on cotton yield and plant-parasitic nematodes in conventional and sod-based crop rotation[J]. Journal of Nematology, 2020, 52: 1-14.
DOI PMID |
[32] |
Chimonyo V G P, Snapp S S, Chikowo R. Grain legumes increase yield stability in maize based cropping systems[J]. Crop Science, 2019, 59(3): 1222-1235.
DOI |
[33] | 徐文修, 罗明, 李银平, 等. 作物茬口对连作棉田土壤环境及棉花产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(3): 271-275. |
XU Wenxiu, LUO Ming, LI Yinping, et al. Effects of crop stubbles on cotton yield and soil environment in continuously cropped cotton field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(3): 271-275. |
[1] | 苗红萍, 王晓伟, 田聪华, 李志, 张玉新, 戴俊生. 塔里木河流域棉花生产与布局演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[2] | 王俊铎, 崔豫疆, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 李雪源. 新疆棉花生产优势区域分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[3] | 郑巨云, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 耿世伟, 孙丰磊, 阳妮, 李雪源, 王俊铎. 新疆机采棉花生产关键技术模式[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[4] | 李杰, 刘佳, 王亮, 张娜, 杨延龙, 郑子漂, 魏鑫, 王萌, 周子馨, 阳妮, 龚照龙, 侯献飞, 黄启秀, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 张济鹏, 张鹏忠. “棉、油、糖”科技成果转化现状及应用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[5] | 扁青永, 付彦博, 祁通, 黄建, 蒲胜海, 孟阿静, 哈丽哈什·依巴提. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花出苗影响因素及保苗措施分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[6] | 李永泰, 高阿香, 李艳军, 张新宇. 脱叶剂对不同敏感性棉花品种生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[7] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[8] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[9] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[10] | 王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[11] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
[12] | 张帆, 陈晓露, 王洁, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 顾元国, 苗昊翠, 李强. 混合盐碱胁迫对花生种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182. |
[13] | 张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[14] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[15] | 张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||