不同包装在物流运输后对蟠桃常温货架期品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.08.015

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (8): 1955-1962.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.08.015

• 园艺特产·农产品加工工程·林业 • 上一篇下一篇

不同包装在物流运输后对蟠桃常温货架期品质的影响

杨明凤¹(), 皇甫兆青², 郭慧静³, 潘艳芳⁴(), 宋方圆³()

1.乌兰乌苏农业气象试验站/乌兰乌苏生态与农业气象新疆野外科学观测研究站/乌兰乌苏国家综合气象观测专项试验外场基地,新疆沙湾 832199
2.石河子大学食品学院,新疆石河子 832003
3.新疆农垦科学院农产品加工研究所,新疆石河子 832000
4.中国农业科学院西部农业研究中心,新疆昌吉 831100

收稿日期:2023-12-19 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-09-19
通信作者: 潘艳芳(1991-),女,高级工程师,博士,硕导,研究方向为果蔬贮藏与加工,(E-mail)panyanfang13@126.com;
宋方圆(1986-),女,副研究员,博士,研究方向为农业工程,(E-mail)562139132@qq.com
作者简介:杨明凤(1985-),女,硕士,研究方向为农林业气象灾害,(E-mail)490109498@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区“三农”骨干人才培养项目(2022SNGGCY054);新疆生产建设兵团重点领域科技攻关项目(2020AB008);兵团英才青年项目(2023-2025);新疆农垦科学院科技计划项目(2020YJ015);中国农业科学院科技创新工程

Study on the influence of different fresh-keeping packages on the shelf life quality of flat peach at room temperature after logistics transportation

YANG Mingfeng¹(), HUANGFU Zhaoqing², Guo Huijing³, Pan Yanfang⁴(), SONG Fangyuan³()

1. Ulan Wusu Agrometeorological Experimental Station, Shawan Xinjiang 832199, China
2. College of Food Science, Shihezi University, Shihezi Xinjiang 832003, China
3. Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi Xinjiang 832000, China
4. Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji Xinjiang 831100, China

Received:2023-12-19 Published:2024-08-20 Online:2024-09-19
Correspondence author: PAN Yanfang (1991-), female, senior engineer, Ph.D., master's supervisor, research direction: fruit and vegetable storage and processing,(E-mail)panyanfang13@126.com;
SONG Fangyuan(1986-), female, associate researcher, doctoral candidate, research direction: agricultural engineering, (E-mail)562139132@qq.com
Supported by:
The "Three rural" backbone personnel training project of the autonomous region(2022SNGGCY054);Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Areas of Science and Technology Research Project(2020AB008);Corps Talented Youth Project(2023-2025);The Guiding Plan project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences(2020YJ015);Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】筛选出保持蟠桃运输后常温货架期最佳品质的包装方式,研究蟠桃在物流运输后不同包装对蟠桃货架期硬度、可溶性固形物(SSC)、腐烂率、相对电导率、多酚氧化酶(PPO)、过氧化物酶(POD)、VC含量的影响。【方法】以英格尔蟠桃为试材,采用不同保鲜处理(无包装,无包装+保鲜袋(0.02mm),自制缓冲垫,自制缓冲垫+保鲜袋(0.02mm),发泡网,发泡网+保鲜袋(0.02mm)),共6个处理,物流运输后蟠桃常温货架期连续测定4 d的理化指标。【结果】相较于其他处理,自制缓冲垫+保鲜袋处理保鲜效果最佳,自制缓冲垫次之,均可有效维持蟠桃较高的SSC、硬度、POD、VC的含量,有效抑制果实腐烂率、相对电导率、PPO的上升。【结论】保鲜袋处理效果优于无保鲜袋处理,自制缓冲垫、发泡网处理保鲜效果优于无包装处理;自制缓冲垫、自制缓冲垫+保鲜袋处理可保持较好的物流运输后果实货架期品质,降低运输途中由于机械碰撞造成的果实货架期品质下降的问题,实现蟠桃远距离运输。

关键词: 蟠桃; 包装; 运输; 货架期; 品质

Abstract:

【Objective】 Select the best packaging method to maintain the best shelf-life quality of flat peach after transportation, the effects of different packaging on shelf-life firmness, soluble solid (SSC), decay rate, relative conductivity, polyphenol oxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD) and vitamin C (VC) were studied. 【Methods】 Using Ingle flat peach as test material, the physical and chemical indexes of flat peach with shelf life of 4 days at room temperature were determined after logistics transportation in different fresh-keeping packages (no packaging, no packaging + storage bag, homemade buffer pad, homemade buffer pad + storage bag, foaming net, foaming net + storage bag). 【Results】 Compared with other packaging home-made cushion + plastic bag, the fresh-keeping effect was the best, followed by homemade buffer pad, which could effectively maintain the higher SSC, hardness, POD and VC contents of the peach, and effectively inhibit the rise of fruit decay rate, relative electrical conductivity and PPO. 【Conclusion】 The effect of plastic bag packaging is better than that of non-plastic bag packaging, the effect of homemade buffer pad and foaming net packaging is better than that of non-packaging group, homemade buffer pad, homemade buffer pad + plastic bag packaging can maintain better quality of fruit shelf life after logistics transportation, reduce the problem of fruit shelf life quality decline caused by mechanical collision during transportation, thus achieving the purpose of long distance transportation of peaches.

Key words: flat peach; fresh-keeping packaging; transportation; shelf life; quality

中图分类号:

S662.1

杨明凤, 皇甫兆青, 郭慧静, 潘艳芳, 宋方圆. 不同包装在物流运输后对蟠桃常温货架期品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1955-1962.

YANG Mingfeng, HUANGFU Zhaoqing, Guo Huijing, Pan Yanfang, SONG Fangyuan. Study on the influence of different fresh-keeping packages on the shelf life quality of flat peach at room temperature after logistics transportation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1955-1962.

图/表 8

图1 不同包装处理示意

Fig.1 Indication of different packaging treatments

图2 不同处理下蟠桃货架期硬度的变化

Fig.2 Changes of firmness of flat peaches with different treatments during shelf life

图3 不同处理下蟠桃货架期可溶性固形物的变化

Fig.3 Changes of SSC of flat peaches with different treatments during shelf life

图4 不同处理下蟠桃货架期相对电导率的变化

Fig.4 Changes of relative conductivity of flat peaches with different treatments during shelf life

图5 不同处理下蟠桃货架期腐烂率的变化

Fig.5 Changes of decay rate of flat peaches with different treatments during shelf life

图6 不同处理下蟠桃货架期PPO变化

Fig.6 Changes of PPO of flat peaches with different treatments during shelf life

图7 不同处理蟠桃货架期POD变化

Fig.7 Changes of POD of flat peaches with different treatments during shelf life

图8 不同处理下蟠桃货架期VC含量的变化

Fig.8 Changes of VC of flat peaches with different treatments during shelf life

参考文献 28

[1]	薛友林, 李欣悦, 张鹏, 等. 不同保鲜膜包装蟠桃在冷藏和常温货架期间品质的变化[J]. 现代食品科技, 2022, 38(5): 108-117, 15.
	XUE Youlin, LI Xinyue, ZHANG Peng, et al. Quality variations in flat peaches wrapped in different plastic wraps during cold storage and shelf storage at room temperature[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2022, 38(5): 108-117, 15.
[2]	陈山乔, 孙志栋, 史婷婷, 等. LAE和1-MCP联合处理在蟠桃常温货架贮藏中的应用[J]. 包装工程, 2019, 40(23): 7-14.
	CHEN Shanqiao, SUN Zhidong, SHI Tingting, et al. Application of integrated LAE and 1-MCP treatment enhancing the shelf-life of flat peachesat room temperature[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2019, 40(23): 7-14.
[3]	王仕栋. 水果减振包装设计及其贮运性能研究[D]. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2022.
	WANG Shidong. Design of Fruit Vibration Reduction Packaging and Its Storage and Transportation Performance[D]. Luoyang: Henan University of Science and Technology, 2022.
[4]	黄斯. 水果减振包装的研制及其在草莓,猕猴桃和葡萄贮运中的应用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.
	HUANG Si. Development and Application of Anti-vibration Package in the Storage and Transportation of Strawberry, Kiwifruit and Grapes[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016.
[5]	郭慧静, 宋方圆, 李冀新, 等. 蟠桃专用包装盒在模拟运输中减振功能分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1284-1291. DOI
	GUO Huijing, SONG Fangyuan, LI Jixin, et al. Effects of special package in simulated transportation of flat peaches[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1284-1291. DOI
[6]	宋方圆, 谢小燕, 郭慧静, 等. 不同蓄冷包装对蟠桃贮藏后货架期品质的影响[J]. 包装工程, 2022, 43(9): 58-64.
	SONG Fangyuan, XIE Xiaoyan, GUO Huijing, et al. Effect of different cold storage packages on the shelf life quality of flat peach after storage[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2022, 43(9): 58-64.
[7]	周然, 闫丽萍, 李云飞, 等. 不同内包装的黄花梨运输振动分析和损伤检测[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2010, 32(18): 133-137.
	ZHOU Ran, YAN Liping, LI Yunfei, et al. Analysis of transport vibration and mechanical damage of Huanghua pears with different inner-packages[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2010, 32(18): 133-137.
[8]	卢立新, 黄祥飞, 华岩. 基于模拟运输条件的梨果实包装振动损伤研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(6): 110-114.
	LU Lixin, HUANG Xiangfei, HUA Yan. Effect of packaging methods on vibration bruising of pear fruits by simulated transport tests[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(6): 110-114.
[9]	Fadiji T, Coetzee C, Chen L, et al. Susceptibility of apples to bruising inside ventilated corrugated paperboard packages during simulated transport damage[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2016, (118): 111-119.
[10]	毛星超. 水果运输缓冲包装研究现状[J]. 今日印刷, 2018,(5): 65-67.
	MAO Xingchao. Research status of fruit transportation cushioning packaging[J]. Print Today, 2018,(5): 65-67.
[11]	陈晓玲, 管维良, 侯东园, 等. 不同包装方式对苹果-蟠桃纸的感官品质和理化特性的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(9): 2956-2963.
	CHEN Xiaoling, GUAN Weiliang, HOU Dongyuan, et al. Effects of different packaging methods on the sensory qualities and physical and chemical properties of apple-flat peach leather[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2022, 13(9): 2956-2963.
[12]	Chen M Y, Lin H T, Zhang S, et al. Effects of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) treatment on postharvest physiology, quality and storage behavior of Longan fruit[J]. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2015, 8(5): 971-982.
[13]	伍新龄, 荆红彭, 张旭, 等. 不同自发气调包装膜对鲜食大豆保鲜效果的比较[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(14): 265-270. DOI
	WU Xinling, JING Hongpeng, ZHANG Xu, et al. Comparison of different packaging materials used for modified atmosphere packaging of green soybean during storage[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(14): 265-270. DOI
[14]	申文赟, 徐碧媛, 宋健坤, 等. 自发气调包装和1-MCP处理对无花果(Ficus carica L.)果实低温贮藏保鲜效果的影响[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 36(3): 164-170.
	SHEN Wenyun, XU Biyuan, SONG Jiankun, et al. Modified atmosphere packaging and 1-MCP treatment on keeping fig(Ficus carica L.)fruit fresh in cold storage[J]. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2019, 36(3): 164-170.
[15]	Jin Yi, Wu Shaobin, Chen Hongbin, et al. Effects of harvest time on the quality and storability of' Hongxin' guava[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2020, 49(4):258-263.
[16]	Lin Y Z, Li N, Lin H T, et al. Effects of chitosan treatment on the storability and quality properties of Longan fruit during storage[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, (306): 125627.
[17]	张筱. 不同保鲜剂对鲜切桃褐变和贮藏品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017: 21-22.
	ZHANG Xiao. Effects of Different Antistaling Agents on Browning and Storage Quality of Fresh-cut Peaches[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2017: 21-22.
[18]	曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版杜, 2013.
	CAO Jiankang, JIANG Weibo, ZHAO Yumei. Postharvest physiological and biochemical experiment instruction of fruits and vegetables[M]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2013.
[19]	李军. 钼蓝比色法测定还原型维生素C[J]. 食品科学, 2000, 21(8): 42-45.
	LI Jun. Study on molybdenum Blue method of L-VC Test by Spectrometry[J]. Food Science, 2000, 21(8): 42-45.
[20]	宋方圆, 李冀新, 赵志永, 等. 不同品种加工番茄常温贮藏期间呼吸强度及硬度变化规律研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(20): 357-359.
	SONG Fangyuan, LI Jixin, ZHAO Zhiyong, et al. Study on change of respiratory intensity and hardness of different varieties of tomatoes during postharvest[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, 34(20): 357-359.
[21]	陈奕兆, 王亦佳, 刚成诚, 等. 壳寡糖、PVP处理对冷藏水蜜桃的保鲜效果比较[J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(18): 332-336. DOI
	CHEN Yizhao, WANG Yijia, GANG Chengcheng, et al. Comparison of effectiveness between chitosan oligosaccharide and PVP in preserving juicy peaches during refrigerated storage[J]. Food Science, 2013, 34(18): 332-336. DOI
[22]	李晓宇, 杜小龙, 刘影, 等. UV-C结合新型生物保鲜纸对水蜜桃常温贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2019, 44(6): 56-62.
	LI Xiaoyu, DU Xiaolong, LIU Ying, et al. Effect of UV-C combined with new biological preservation paper on storage quality of honey peaches at room temperature[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2019, 44(6): 56-62.
[23]	田世平, 徐勇, 姜爱丽, 等. 冬雪蜜桃在气调冷藏期间品质及相关酶活性的变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2001, 34(6): 656-661.
	TIAN Shiping, XU Yong, JIANG Aili, et al. Changes in enzymatic activity and quality attributes of Dongxue peaches in response to controlled atmosphere conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2001, 34(6): 656-661.
[24]	王玲利, 刘超, 曾明, 等. 采后处理对“黄冠” 梨膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2017, 46(2): 132-136.
	WANG Lingli, LIU Chao, ZENG Ming, et al. Effects of postharvest treatment on membrane lipid peroxidation and protective enzyme activity of “Huang Guan” pear[J]. South China Fruits, 2017, 46(2): 132-136.
[25]	杨剑平, 韩涛, 李丽萍, 等. 热处理对桃贮藏期膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 1996, 23(1): 89-90.
	YANG Jianping, HAN Tao, LI Liping, et al. Effects of heat treatment on membrane-lipid peroxidation of peach fruit during storage[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1996, 23(1): 89-90.
[26]	关夏玉, 章希娟, 陈清西. 气调保鲜袋对香蕉采后品质及生理生化的影响[J]. 福建果树, 2010,(1): 19-24.
	GUAN Xiayu, ZHANG Xijuan, CHEN Qingxi. Effect of modified atmosphere bag treatment on post-harvest physiology, biochemistry and quality in banana[J]. Fujian Fruits, 2010,(1): 19-24.
[27]	黄余年. 处理方式及贮藏温度对黄桃采后生理特性及相关品质的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2021.
	HUANG Yunian. Treatment and Storage Temperature of Yellow-fleshed Peach after Harvest Influence of Physiological Characteristics and Related Qualities[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2021.
[28]	黎春红, 周宏胜, 张雷刚, 等. 不同内包装方式对模拟运输过程中水蜜桃品质的影响[J]. 现代食品科技, 2017, 33(12): 177-183, 114.
	LI Chunhong, ZHOU Hongsheng, ZHANG Leigang, et al. Effects of different inner-packages treatments on the quality of juicy peach fruits during simulated transportation[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2017, 33(12): 177-183, 114.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	5	0	0	27

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	21	11
比例	66%	34%

摘要

106

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	106

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	39	67
比例	37%	63%

不同包装在物流运输后对蟠桃常温货架期品质的影响

Study on the influence of different fresh-keeping packages on the shelf life quality of flat peach at room temperature after logistics transportation

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

[1]	靳娟, 李丽莉, 杨磊, 樊丁宇, 郝庆. 新疆红枣产业发展现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110.
[2]	方辉, 丁银灯, 范贵强, 高永红, 黄天荣. 新疆南疆小麦产业发展的现状及品质特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80.
[3]	杨明花, 廖必勇, 刘强, 彭云承, 达吾来·杰克山, 冯国瑞, 唐式敏. 鲜食糯玉米籽粒营养品质的差异变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093.
[4]	张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[5]	陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[6]	张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
[7]	刘晶, 杜明川, 张文婷, 鲍海娟, 景美玲, 杜文华. 青海不同地区小黑麦种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190.
[8]	田海燕, 张占琴, 颉建辉, 王建江, 杨相昆. 加工番茄果实番茄红素与主要品质性状的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202.
[9]	张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[10]	陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[11]	乔雅洁, 付慧鑫, 乔雪, 孟新涛, 张婷, 潘俨. 不同贮藏温度条件下鲜牛肉品质的变化规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2323-2329.
[12]	张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[13]	李自芹, 李文绮, 陶登峰, 贾文婷, 金新文, 雷用东, 刘成江. 不同预冷方式结合H₂O₂熏蒸处理对西梅贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1947-1954.
[14]	张浩, 梁其干, 张学军, 符小发, 陈积豪, 周勃, 黄远. 刺角瓜砧木抗性分析及其嫁接对甜瓜品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1963-1968.
[15]	陈积豪, 张浩, 梁其干, 符小发, 张学军, 毛建才. 减施化肥增施蚯蚓粪有机肥对连作甜瓜的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1969-1975.