不同喷药机械与药剂组合对棉花脱叶催熟效果及产量和品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.008

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 852-860.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.008

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同喷药机械与药剂组合对棉花脱叶催熟效果及产量和品质的影响

刘太杰¹(), 陈兵¹(), 杨立², 王静³, 赵静¹, 李翔², 唐广兰², 王刚¹, 韩焕勇¹, 王方永¹

1.新疆农垦科学院棉花研究所/农业农村部西北内陆区棉花生物学与遗传育种重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000
2.新疆生产建设兵团无人机行业协会,乌鲁木齐 830002
3.新疆石河子职业技术学院水建分院,新疆石河子 832003

收稿日期:2023-07-19 出版日期:2024-04-20 发布日期:2024-05-31
通信作者: 陈兵(1979-),男,甘肃高台人,研究员,博士,研究方向为作物栽培,(E-mail)zyrcb@126.com
作者简介:刘太杰(1994-),男,新疆阿拉尔人,助理研究员,研究方向为棉花高产高效栽培,(E-mail)1569025833qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFD1001002);新疆生产建设兵团英才;新疆生产建设兵团领军人才计划(2019CB018)

Effects of different spraying machinery and pesticide combination on the defoliation,the ripeness,yield and quality of cotton

LIU Taijie¹(), CHEN Bing¹(), YANG Li², WANG Jing³, ZHAO Jing¹, LI Xiang², TANG Guanglan², WANG Gang¹, HAN Huanyong¹, WANG Fangyong¹

1. Cotton Research Institute,Xinjiang Academy of Agri-Reclamation Sciences/Northwest Inland Region Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Shihezi Xinjiang 832000,China
2. Xinjiang Production and Constrution Corps Drone Industry Association,Urumqi 830002 China
3. Institute of Water Conservation and Architectural Engineering,Xinjiang Shihezi Vocational College,Shihezi Xinjiang 832003,China

Received:2023-07-19 Published:2024-04-20 Online:2024-05-31
Correspondence author: CHEN Bing(1979-),male, from Gaotai, Gansu, researcher,Ph.D., research direction:crop cultivation physiology,(E-mail)zyrcb@126.com
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Project of China(2020YFD1001002);Outstanding personnal of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps;Leading Talent Project of XPCC(2019CB018)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同喷药机械与药剂组合对棉花脱叶催熟效果及产量品质的影响,为机采棉提质增效合理使用无人机喷施脱叶剂提供参考。【方法】设置不同喷药机械喷施棉花脱叶剂试验,处理包括不同机械类型、不同药剂组合7个处理,分析不同处理的棉花脱叶率、挂枝率、吐絮率、产量及品质差异。【结果】在相同药剂处理下,棉花脱叶率和挂枝率表现为大疆T16无人机>极飞P30无人机>机车东方红LX2204;吐絮率、单株铃数、衣分、产量、马克隆值和断裂伸长率则是极飞P30无人机>大疆T16无人机>机车东方红LX2204。在增加相同飞防助剂后,棉花脱叶率、吐絮率、单株铃数和产量均是极飞P30无人机>大疆T16无人机>机车东方红LX2204;挂枝率、整齐度指数和断裂比强度表现为大疆T16无人机>极飞P30无人机>机车东方红LX2204。不同无人机类型T₂处理(极飞P30无人机+臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂)和T₅处理(大疆T16无人机+瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通)的综合脱叶催熟效果最佳。喷药后20 d,T₂处理和T₅处理喷药分别较机车喷药脱叶率高1.97%和1.41%,吐絮率分别低0.51%和1.52%;T₂处理产量最高,籽棉产量比机车喷施增产25.56%和25.22%;品质较好,纤维上半部平均长度、整齐度指数和断裂伸长率较机车低 1.77%、2.23%和3.34%,断裂比强度和马克隆值较机车高1.95%和1.99%。【结论】2种无人机喷施脱叶剂组合均比机车起到较好的脱叶催熟效果,比机车的棉花产量略高且提高了部分纤维品质参数,T₂和T₅处理可在大田机采棉上推广应用。

关键词: 无人机; 脱叶剂; 棉花; 纤维品质; 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of spraying machinery and pesticide combination on cotton defoliation,ripeness,yield and quality,in the hope of providing reference for the rational use of UAV defoliant for improving the quality and efficiency of machine-picked cotton.【Methods】 Experiments on the different spraying machines to spray cotton defoliation were carried out,different machine types,chemical combinations and other treatments were set up to analyze the differences in cotton defoliation rate,branch hanging rate,boll opening rate,etc.【Results】 Under the same agent treatment,the elongation rate and branch hanging rate were shown as DJI T16 UAV> DJI T16 UAV > Locomotive DFH LX2204 and in terms of boll number per plant,lint,yield Micronaire value and elongation at break were XAG P30 UAV > DJI T16 UAV > Locomotive DFH LX2204.After adding the same anti-flying adjuvant,the defoliation rate,flocculation rate,boll number per plant and yield were all the same as those of XAG P30 UAV > DJI T16 UAV > Locomotive DFH LX2204,branch hanging rate,uniformity index and the fracture strength were shown as DJI T16 UAV > XAG P30 UAV > Locomotive DFH LX2204.Different UAV types T₂ treatment(XAG P30 UAV + Zhenling + Auxiliary + Ethephon + Bedaton+CAU specific agent) and T₅ treatment(DJI T16 UAV + Rettolone + Aviation + Ethephon + Bedaton) did the best.When it came to 20 days after spraying,the defoliation rate of T₂ treatment and T₅ treatment was 1.97% and 1.41% higher than that of the Locomotive spraying,and the flocculation rate was slightly lower by 0.51% and 1.52%,respectively; T₂ treatment had the highest yield,and the seed cotton yield were 25.56% and 25.22% higher than that of locomotive spraying; the quality were better,while the average length,uniformity index and elongation of the upper half were 1.77%,2.23% and 3.34% lower than those of Locomotive spraying.The breaking strength and Micronaire value were 1.95% and 1.99% higher than those of the locomotive.【Conclusion】 Both kinds of defoliant combination sprayed by UAV can achieve better defoliation and ripening effect than that of Locomotive,slightly higher cotton yield than that of Locomotive,and improve some fiber quality parameters.In comprehensive consideration,T₂ and T₅ treatment are recommended to be popularized and applied in field mechanical cotton harvesting.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle; defoliants; cotton; fiber quality; yield

中图分类号:

S562
513

刘太杰, 陈兵, 杨立, 王静, 赵静, 李翔, 唐广兰, 王刚, 韩焕勇, 王方永. 不同喷药机械与药剂组合对棉花脱叶催熟效果及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 852-860.

LIU Taijie, CHEN Bing, YANG Li, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jing, LI Xiang, TANG Guanglan, WANG Gang, HAN Huanyong, WANG Fangyong. Effects of different spraying machinery and pesticide combination on the defoliation,the ripeness,yield and quality of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 852-860.

图/表 7

参考文献 25

[1]	王爱玉, 高明伟, 王志伟, 等. 棉花化学脱叶催熟技术应用研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(4):20-23. DOI
	WANG Aiyu, GAO Mingwei, WANG Zhiwei, et al. Research progress on the technology of chemical defoliation and ripening in cotton[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2015, 5(4):20-23. DOI
[2]	田晓莉, 李召虎, 段留生, 等. 棉花化学催熟与脱叶技术[J]. 中国棉花, 2006, 33(1):4-6,8.
	TIAN Xiaoli, LI Zhaohu, YIN Liusheng, et al. Chemical ripening and defoliation technology of cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2006, 33(1):4-6,8.
[3]	袁会珠, 郭永旺, 薛新宇, 等. 植保无人飞机的推广应用对于提高我国农药利用率的作用[J]. 农业工程技术, 2018, 38(9):46-50.
	YUAN Huizhu, GUO Yongwang, XUE Xinyu, et al. The promotion and application of UAVs for improving the utilization rate of pesticides in China[J]. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2018, 38(9):46-50.
[4]	闫晓静, 褚世海, 杨代斌, 等. 给农业插上科技的翅膀:植保无人机低容量喷雾技术助力农药减施增效[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(3):469-476.
	YAN Xiaojing, CHU Shihai, YANG Daibin, et al. Agriculture on the wings of science and technology:plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) low-volume spraying technology reduces pesticide use and boosts control efficacy[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2021, 48(3):469-476.
[5]	张海艳, 兰玉彬, 文晟, 等. 植保无人机旋翼风场模型与雾滴运动机理研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22):1-12.
	ZHANG Haiyan, LAN Yubin, WEN Sheng, et al. Research progress in rotor airflow model of plant protection UAV and droplet motion mechanism[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(22):1-12.
[6]	雷斌, 张云生, 李忠华, 等. 棉花脱叶剂的田间效果筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(12):2321-2324.
	LEI Bin, ZHANG Yunsheng, LI Zhonghua, et al. Field effect screening of defoliants for cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(12):2321-2324.
[7]	Xin F, Zhao J, Zhou Y T, et al. Effects of dosage and spraying volume on cotton defoliants efficacy:a case study based on application of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Agronomy, 2018, 8(6):85.
[8]	Chen P C, Ouyang F, Wang G B, et al. Droplet distributions in cotton harvest aid applications vary with the interactions among the unmanned aerial vehicle spraying parameters[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021,163:113324.
[9]	张坤朋, 邓喜军, 王朝阳. 无人机喷洒不同棉花催熟、脱叶复合药剂效果研究[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(8):619-623.
	ZHANG Kunpeng, DENG Xijun, WANG Chaoyang. Effects of different composite chemicals on cottonripening and defoliation sprayed by UAV[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(8):619-623.
[10]	王国宾, 王十周, 陈鹏超, 等. 植保无人机喷施不同雾滴粒径药剂对其在棉花冠层沉积、穿透及脱叶催熟效果的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(3):493-500.
	WANG Guobin, WANG Shizhou, CHEN Pengchao, et al. Effect of spraying droplet size with droneson deposition,penetration,and cotton harvest-aid efficacy[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2021, 48(3):493-500.
[11]	窦泽晨, 方治豪, 杜睿, 等. 棉花脱叶催熟剂药液理化性质的变化及对植保无人飞机喷施效果的影响[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(4):834-843.
	DOU Zechen, FANG Zhihao, DU Rui, et al. Effect of cotton harvest aids solution on spraying effectby plant protection unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2022, 24(4):834-843.
[12]	Xiao Q G, Xin F, Lou Z X, et al. Effect of aviation spray adjuvants on defoliant droplet deposition and cotton defoliation efficacy sprayed by unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Journal of Agronomy, 2019, 9(5):217.
[13]	马艳, 任相亮, 蒙艳华, 等. 无人植保机在新疆棉田喷施脱叶剂测试结果评述[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(12):16-20. DOI
	MA Yan, REN Xiangliang, MENG Yanhua, et al. Review on result of spraying defoliant by unmanned aerial vehicles in cotton field of Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2016, 43(12):16-20. DOI
[14]	马辉, 戴路, 田立文, 等. 基于TOPSIS法评价无人机喷施脱叶催熟剂的效果[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(2):24-28,35. DOI
	MA Hui, DAI Lu, TIAN Liwen, et al. Evaluation of effect of unmanned aerial vehicle spraying defoliation ripening agents on cotton based on TOPSIS[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(2):24-28,35. DOI
[15]	付凯. 植保无人机在奎屯垦区喷施棉花脱叶剂的应用效果研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019.
	FU Kai, Application effect of cotton defoliant sprayed by plant protection UAV in Kuitun district[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019.
[16]	王林, 张强, 马江锋, 等, 新疆棉区植保无人机喷施棉花脱叶催熟剂效果研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3):200-208. DOI
	WANG Lin, ZHANG Qiang, MA Jiangfeng, et al. Study on the effect of spraying cotton defoliant by plant protection UAVs in Xinjiang cotton area[J]. Cotton Science, 2021, 33(3):200-208.
[17]	胡红岩, 任相亮, 马小艳, 等. 无人机喷施与人工喷施棉花脱叶剂效果对比[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(7):13-15,19. DOI
	HU Hongyan, REN Xiangliang, MA Xiaoyan, et al. Comparison of defoliation effects between unmanned air vehicle spraying and artificial spraying in cotton field[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(7):13-15,19. DOI
[18]	Meng Y H, Han Y X, Liang Z J, et al. Harvest-aid application strategy in different cotton planting densities by unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2019, 2(1):31-41.
[19]	陈宇楠, 胡红岩, 任相亮, 等. 助剂对无人机喷施棉花脱叶剂作业效果的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(3):19-22,26. DOI
	CHEN Yunan, HU Hongyan, REN Xiangliang, et al. Effect of aviation spray adjuvants on cotton defoliation efficacy sprayed by unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(3):19-22,26. DOI
[20]	高军, 李兴钊, 吴春娟, 等. 多旋翼植保无人机在小麦不同生育期飞防飞行参数优选初探[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(1):77-81,101.
	GAO Jun, LI Xingzhao, WU Chunjuan, et al. Preliminary study on optimal flight parameters of multi-rotor plant protection UAV in different growth periods of wheat[J]. China Plant Protection, 2021, 41(1):77-81,101.
[21]	柏超, 沈伟棋, 杨健, 等. 不同型号无人机施药对雾滴沉积和稻曲病防效的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(10):2090-2091,2095.
	BAI Chao, SHEN Weiqi, YANG Jian, et al. Effects of different types of drones on droplet depositionand control of rice smut[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 61(10):2090-2091,2095.
[22]	马麒, 李吉莲, 宁新柱, 等. 新陆早60号基于两种机采种植模式下化学脱叶催熟效果分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(5):139-144. DOI
	MA Qi, LI Jilian, NING Xinzhu, et al. Analysis on the effect of chemical defoliation and ripening of Xinluzao 60 under two kinds of mechanical cotton-picking planting models[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2020, 41(5):139-144.
[23]	周先林, 覃琴, 王龙, 等. 脱叶剂对两种机采模式下棉花脱叶效果及纤维品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(11):144-152. DOI
	ZHOU Xianlin, QIN Qin, WANG Long, et al. Influence of defoliant on defoliation effect and fiber quality of cotton under two kinds of mechanical harvesting modes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11):144-152. DOI
[24]	袁会珠, 王国宾. 雾滴大小和覆盖密度与农药防治效果的关系[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6):9-16.
	YUAN Huizhu, WANG Guobin. Effects of droplet size and deposition density on field efficacy of pesticides[J]. Crop Protection, 2015, 41(6):9-16.
[25]	陆显斌. 植保无人机飞防作业应用特点与存在问题分析[J]. 农机使用与维修, 2021,(2):25-26.
	LUN Xianbin. Analysis of application characteristics and existing problems of plant protection UAV in flight prevention operation[J]. Agricultural Machinery Using & Maintenance, 2021,(2):25-26.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	12	0	0	37

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	25	24
比例	51%	49%

摘要

245

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	245

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	40	205
比例	16%	84%

试验机型 Test model	速度 Speed	距离冠层高度 High (m)	喷液量 Liquid injection volume (L/hm²)	喷幅 Spray amplitude (m)
大疆T16无人机 Dji T16 UAV	5 m/s	2	18	4.5
极飞P30无人机 XAG P30 UAV	5 m/s	2	15	4.3
东方红LX2204机车 DFH LX2204	5 km/h	0.2	525	12

试验机型 Test model	速度 Speed	距离冠层高度 High (m)	喷液量 Liquid injection volume (L/hm²)	喷幅 Spray amplitude (m)
大疆T16无人机 Dji T16 UAV	5 m/s	2	18	4.5
极飞P30无人机 XAG P30 UAV	5 m/s	2	15	4.3
东方红LX2204机车 DFH LX2204	5 km/h	0.2	525	12

处理 Treatment	喷药机型 Spraying machine	药剂组合 Reagent combinationt	药剂用量 Dosage of defoliant	水量 Water volume (L/hm²)
T₁	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A)	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+720 g/hm²+225 mL/hm²+375 mL/hm²	18
T₂	极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A)	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+720 g/hm²+225 mL/hm²+375 mL/hm²	15
T₃	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	18
T₄	极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	15
T₅	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times)	瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通 R+A+E+B	225 g/hm²+225 g/hm²+750 g/hm²+225 mL/hm²	18
T₆	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times)	瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E	225 g/hm²+225 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	18
T₇(CK)	机车东方红LX2204(1遍DFH LX2204(1 time)	瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E	225 g/hm²+225 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	525

处理 Treatment	喷药机型 Spraying machine	药剂组合 Reagent combinationt	药剂用量 Dosage of defoliant	水量 Water volume (L/hm²)
T₁	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A)	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+720 g/hm²+225 mL/hm²+375 mL/hm²	18
T₂	极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A)	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+720 g/hm²+225 mL/hm²+375 mL/hm²	15
T₃	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	18
T₄	极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times)	臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E	225 g/hm²+900 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	15
T₅	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times)	瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通 R+A+E+B	225 g/hm²+225 g/hm²+750 g/hm²+225 mL/hm²	18
T₆	大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times)	瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E	225 g/hm²+225 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	18
T₇(CK)	机车东方红LX2204(1遍DFH LX2204(1 time)	瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E	225 g/hm²+225 g/hm²+750 g/hm²	525

处理 Treatments	铃重 Boll weight (g)	单株铃数 Number of bolls per plant	衣分 Lint percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Seed yield (kg/hm²)	籽棉增产率 Seed yield increase (%)	皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm²)	皮棉增产率 Lint yield increase (%)
T₁	4.42^bc	8.61^a	42.26^ab	6 864.26^a	24.08	2 900.83^a	22.66
T₂	4.65^ab	8.27^a	41.91^ab	6 946.17^a	25.56	2 911.14^a	22.94
T₃	4.50^abc	7.30^bc	40.74^b	5 926.76^b	7.13	2 414.56^b	2.03
T₄	4.43^bc	8.05^ab	41.11^ab	6 437.66^ab	16.37	2 646.52^ab	12.01
T₅	4.64^ab	8.27^a	41.43^ab	6 927.19^a	25.22	2 870.39^a	21.40
T₆	4.3816^c	7.88^ab	42.48^a	6 218.55^ab	12.41	2 641.95^ab	11.72
T₇(CK)	4.69^a	6.54^c	42.77^a	5 531.91^b	0	2 366.18^b	0

不同喷药机械与药剂组合对棉花脱叶催熟效果及产量和品质的影响

Effects of different spraying machinery and pesticide combination on the defoliation,the ripeness,yield and quality of cotton

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

处理 Treatments	纤维上半部平均长度 Upper half mean length (mm)	长度整齐度指数 Uniformity index (%)	马克隆值 Micronaire	断裂比强度 Breaking tenacity (CN/tex)	断裂伸长率 Breaking elongation (%)
T₁	28.88^b	84.30^ab	3.95^a	32.75^ab	6.75^ab
T₂	29.21^ab	83.30^c	4.09^a	32.25^bc	6.67^c
T₃	29.79^a	84.73^a	3.87^a	31.55^c	6.80^a
T₄	29.88^a	84.93^a	3.53^a	33.85^a	6.70^c
T₅	29.46^ab	84.53^ab	3.65^a	31.50^c	6.80^ab
T₆	29.33^ab	84.80^a	3.75^a	31.53^c	6.75^ab
T₇(CK)	29.40^ab	85.20^a	4.01^a	33.20^ab	6.90^a

[1]	苗红萍, 王晓伟, 田聪华, 李志, 张玉新, 戴俊生. 塔里木河流域棉花生产与布局演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226.
[2]	戴爱梅, 叶梦迪, 丁志梅, 王志慧, 乔晓燕, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 叶晓琴, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 康健, 丁新华, 郭文超. 不同苯唑氟草酮施药方式防除玉米田杂草药效及安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 28-34.
[3]	王俊铎, 崔豫疆, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 李雪源. 新疆棉花生产优势区域分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69.
[4]	郑巨云, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 耿世伟, 孙丰磊, 阳妮, 李雪源, 王俊铎. 新疆机采棉花生产关键技术模式[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74.
[5]	李杰, 刘佳, 王亮, 张娜, 杨延龙, 郑子漂, 魏鑫, 王萌, 周子馨, 阳妮, 龚照龙, 侯献飞, 黄启秀, 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 张济鹏, 张鹏忠. “棉、油、糖”科技成果转化现状及应用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94.
[6]	扁青永, 付彦博, 祁通, 黄建, 蒲胜海, 孟阿静, 哈丽哈什·依巴提. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花出苗影响因素及保苗措施分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100.
[7]	李永泰, 高阿香, 李艳军, 张新宇. 脱叶剂对不同敏感性棉花品种生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102.
[8]	张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[9]	陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[10]	黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[11]	王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[12]	张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
[13]	张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[14]	陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[15]	张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.