基于无人机多光谱NDVI值估测玉米产量

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.007

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 845-851.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.007

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

基于无人机多光谱NDVI值估测玉米产量

张磊¹^,²(), 姚梦瑶²^,³, 刘志刚², 李娟², 杨洋², 蔡大润², 陈果², 李波², 李晓荣², 陈勋基², 翟云龙¹()

1.塔里木大学农学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.新疆农作物生物技术重点实验室/新疆农业科学院核技术生物技术研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆农业大学农学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2023-09-11 出版日期:2024-04-20 发布日期:2024-05-31
通信作者: 翟云龙(1979-),男,河南扶沟人,教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为作物高产,(E-mail)zylzky@163.com
作者简介:张磊(1999-),男,甘肃武威人,硕士研究生,研究方向为玉米遗传育种,(E-mail)1822835613@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32160440);玛纳斯县国家级杂交玉米种子生产基地建设项目(MNSZZDX-2021-01);新疆生物育种协同创新平台建设项目(202114863)

Research of maize yield estimation based on unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral NDVI

ZHANG Lei¹^,²(), YAO Mengyao²^,³, LIU Zhigang², LI Juan², YANG Yang², CAI Darun², CHEN Guo², LI Bo², LI Xiaorong², CHEN Xunji², ZHAI Yunlong¹()

1. College of Agriculture, Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
2. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Crop Biotechnology/Institute of Nuclear Technology and Biotechnology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2023-09-11 Published:2024-04-20 Online:2024-05-31
Correspondence author: ZHAI Yunlong (1979-), male, from Fugou, Henan,professor,Ph.D., the research diretion of high yield theory and technology of crops,(E-mail)zylzky@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32160440);Manas County National Hybrid Maize Seed Production Base Construction Project(MNSZZDX-2021-01);Xinjiang Biological Breeding Collaborative Innovation Platform Construction Project(202114863)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究基于UAS-8无人机采集数据,运用归一化植被指数(Normalized Difference Vegetation Index)模型估测玉米产量,为大田无人机多光谱预测玉米产量提供理论依据。【方法】以新疆18份春播玉米为研究对象,获取开花期多光谱图像,经过辐射校正、大气校正、建立掩膜、提取NDVI图,计算植被覆盖率,得到区光谱反射率和归一化植被指数实际数值,将NDVI值与田间实测产量值进行模型拟合。【结果】幂函数Y = 23 411.46-10 997.99 / X(R² = 0.488 6),二次函数为Y = 39 003.00-117 963.03X + 103 130.25X²(R²=0.562),正反比函数(Inverse Proportional Function)为Y₂ = 2 840.5 X/(1-X)(R² = 0.495),利用偏最小二乘回归(Partial Least Squares Regression),其线性函数 Y = 24 458.22X-9 620.55(R² =0.521)。【结论】在数值0.5~0.8区间,NDVI与玉米产量具有较高的相关性,线性函数方程NDVI值可预测玉米的产量。

关键词: 玉米; 产量; 归一化植被指数(NDVI); 偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the normalized difference vegetation index, an estimation model for maize yield,this study has provided a theoretical basis for the multispectral prediction of maize yield by field UAV. 【Methods】 Xinjiang eighteen spring-sown maize was taken as the research object, a multispectral image of the flowering period was obtained, and the actual spectral reflectance of the experimental area was obtained after radiometric correction, atmospheric correction, establishment of mask, extraction of NDVI map, and calculation of vegetation coverage, so as to obtain the actual value of normalized vegetation index. In addition to that, the NDVI value was fitted to the measured yield in the field. 【Results】 The power functions Y = 23,411.46-10,997.99 / X (R² = 0.488,6), polynomial functions Y = 39,003.00-117,963.03X + 103,130.25X₂ (R² = 0.562,0), using partial least squares regression. The result was a linear function Y = 24,458.22X-9,620.55 (R² = 0.722,2). 【Conclusion】 The results show that it has a certain correlation with maize yield, and the linear function model of NDVI value and yield during the critical period of maize growth.

Key words: maize; yield; normalized vegetation index (NDVI); partial least squares regression (PLSR)

中图分类号:

S512

张磊, 姚梦瑶, 刘志刚, 李娟, 杨洋, 蔡大润, 陈果, 李波, 李晓荣, 陈勋基, 翟云龙. 基于无人机多光谱NDVI值估测玉米产量[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 845-851.

ZHANG Lei, YAO Mengyao, LIU Zhigang, LI Juan, YANG Yang, CAI Darun, CHEN Guo, LI Bo, LI Xiaorong, CHEN Xunji, ZHAI Yunlong. Research of maize yield estimation based on unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral NDVI[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 845-851.

图/表 8

参考文献 21

[1]	李学国. 基于无人机遥感光谱图像的小麦玉米长势精准监测研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
	LI Xueguo. Study on Precise Monitoring of Wheat and Corn Growth Based on Remote Sensing Image of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019.
[2]	陈怀亮, 李颖, 张红卫. 农作物长势遥感监测业务化应用与研究进展[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2015, 38(1): 95-102.
	CHEN Huailiang, LI Ying, ZHANG Hongwei. Operational application and research review of crop growth monitoring with remote sensing[J]. Meteorological and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 38(1): 95-102.
[3]	高林, 杨贵军, 王宝山, 等. 基于无人机遥感影像的大豆叶面积指数反演研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(7): 868-876.
	GAO Lin, YANG Guijun, WANG Baoshan, et al. Soybean leaf area index retrieval with UAV(unmanned aerial vehicle) remote sensing imagery[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(7): 868-876.
[4]	Han X Z, Thomasson J A, Bagnall G C, et al. Measurement and calibration of plant-height from fixed-wing UAV images[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(12): 4092.
[5]	Shafian S, Rajan N, Schnell R, et al. Using a fixed wing UAV remote sensing system for Sorghum Crop Phenotyping [A]// 2016: B53H-B612H.
[6]	Geipel J, Link J, Claupein W. Combined spectral and spatial modeling of corn yield based on aerial images and crop surface models acquired with an unmanned aircraft system[J]. Remote Sensing, 2014, 6(11): 10335-10355.
[7]	Magney T S, Eitel J U H, Huggins D R, et al. Proximal NDVI derived phenology improves in-season predictions of wheat quantity and quality[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016, 217: 46-60.
[8]	Foster A J, Kakani V G, Mosali J. Estimation of bioenergy crop yield and N status by hyperspectral canopy reflectance and partial least square regression[J]. Precision Agriculture, 2017, 18(2): 192-209.
[22]	贺佳, 王来刚, 郭燕, 等. 基于无人机多光谱遥感的玉米LAI估算研究[J]. 农业大数据学报, 2021, 3(4): 20-28.
	HE Jia, WANG Laigang, GUO Yan, et al. Research on maize LAI estimation based on UAV multispectral remote sensing[J]. Journal of Agricultural Big Data, 2021, 3(4): 20-28.
[9]	Samborski S M, Gozdowski D, Walsh O S, et al. Winter wheat genotype effect on canopy reflectance: implications for using NDVI for In-season nitrogen topdressing recommendations[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107(6): 2097-2106.
[10]	Rutkoski J, Poland J, Mondal S, et al. Canopy temperature and vegetation indices from high-throughput phenotyping improve accuracy of pedigree and genomic selection for grain yield in wheat[J]. G3 Genes\|Genomes\|Genetics, 2016, 6(9): 2799-2808.
[11]	Kumar S, Röder M S, Singh R P, et al. Mapping of spot blotch disease resistance using NDVI as a substitute to visual observation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2016, 36(7): 95.
[12]	Kyratzis A, Skarlatos D, Fotopoulos V, et al. Investigating correlation among NDVI index derived by unmanned aerial vehicle photography and grain yield under late drought stress conditions[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2015, 29: 225-226.
[13]	Babar M A, Reynolds M P, van Ginkel M, et al. Spectral reflectance indices as a potential indirect selection criteria for wheat yield under irrigation[J]. Crop Science, 2006, 46(2): 578-588.
[14]	陈晨. 基于无人机图像的小麦生物量与产量的估测研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2019.
	CHEN Chen. Estimation of Wheat Biomass and Yield Based on UAV Images[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2019.
[15]	Chen Y, Donohue R J, McVicar T R, et al. Nationwide crop yield estimation based on photosynthesis and meteorological stress indices[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020, 284: 107872.
[16]	Chakrabarti S, Bongiovanni T, Judge J, et al. Assimilation of SMOS soil moisture for quantifying drought impacts on crop yield in agricultural regions[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(9): 3867-3879.
[17]	Sakamoto T. Incorporating environmental variables into a MODIS-based crop yield estimation method for United States corn and soybeans through the use of a random forest regression algorithm[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2020, 160: 208-228.
[18]	田明璐, 班松涛, 常庆瑞, 等. 基于无人机成像光谱仪数据的棉花叶绿素含量反演[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(11): 285-293.
	TIAN Minglu, BAN Songtao, CHANG Qingrui, et al. Estimation of SPAD value of cotton leaf using hyperspectral images from UAV-based imaging spectroradiometer[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(11): 285-293.
[19]	孟沌超. 基于无人机可见光影像的棉花氮素和叶绿素反演方法研究[D]. 淄博: 山东理工大学, 2021.
	MENG Dunchao. Study on inversion method of cotton nitrogen and chlorophyll based on UAV visible light image[D]. Zibo: Shandong University of Technology, 2021.
[20]	刘小辉. 基于无人机影像的小麦叶绿素含量及产量定量反演研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2019.
	LIU Xiaohui. Inversion of Wheat Chlorophyll Content and Yield Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images[D]. Hefei: Anhui University, 2019.
[21]	邹楠, 杨文杰, 肖春华, 等. 种植密度对玉米冠层高光谱特征的响应研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(6): 687-692.
	ZOU Nan, YANG Wenjie, XIAO Chunhua, et al. Response of planting density to hyperspectral characteristics of maize canopy[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2017, 35(6): 687-692.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	10	0	0	42

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	36	16
比例	69%	31%

摘要

267

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	267

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	69	198
比例	26%	74%

玉米种质名称 Corn germplasm name	NDVI	实测产量 Measured yield (kg/hm²)
20HN009×16F	0.746 771	6 309.52
20HN064×DB614	0.781 470	7 261.90
20HN068×DB614	0.634 637	4 404.76
20HN069×DB614	0.663 515	5 595.23
20HN070×DB614	0.792 066	11 666.66
20HN084×DB614	0.672 930	6 071.42
20HN086×DB614	0.781 432	9 880.95
20HN096×DB614	0.565 060	5 476.19
20HN102×DB614	0.603 867	5 833.33
20HN104×DB614	0.743 107	9 523.80
20HN142×DB614	0.728 815	7 142.85
20HN152×DB614	0.748 561	6 666.66
20HN094×1487F	0.719 880	10 476.19
20HN095×1487F	0.794 545	11 071.42
20HN098×1487F	0.793 120	10 833.34
20HN107×1487F	0.740 062	9 523.80
20HN153×K487F	0.728 140	9 880.95
20HN326×A55	0.756 129	7 023.80

玉米种质名称 Corn germplasm name	NDVI	实测产量 Measured yield (kg/hm²)
20HN009×16F	0.746 771	6 309.52
20HN064×DB614	0.781 470	7 261.90
20HN068×DB614	0.634 637	4 404.76
20HN069×DB614	0.663 515	5 595.23
20HN070×DB614	0.792 066	11 666.66
20HN084×DB614	0.672 930	6 071.42
20HN086×DB614	0.781 432	9 880.95
20HN096×DB614	0.565 060	5 476.19
20HN102×DB614	0.603 867	5 833.33
20HN104×DB614	0.743 107	9 523.80
20HN142×DB614	0.728 815	7 142.85
20HN152×DB614	0.748 561	6 666.66
20HN094×1487F	0.719 880	10 476.19
20HN095×1487F	0.794 545	11 071.42
20HN098×1487F	0.793 120	10 833.34
20HN107×1487F	0.740 062	9 523.80
20HN153×K487F	0.728 140	9 880.95
20HN326×A55	0.756 129	7 023.80

名称 Name	无人机 Unmanned aerial vehicle	多光谱相机 Multispectral camera
型号Model	EcoDrone^® UAS-8	MicaSense Red Edge-M^TM
尺寸Size	1 632 mm × 1 632 mm × 650 mm(螺旋桨、GPS支架均展开)	94 mm × 63 mm× 46 mm
重量 Weight	10 kg(最大载荷6 kg)	170 g (包括DLS)
焦距 Focal length		35 mm
最大分辨率 Maximum resolution		1 280 × 960
光谱带 Spectval band		R、G、B、NIR、Red edge
作业时间 Operation time	30 min	30 min
最大可承受风速 Maximum tolerable wind speed	10 m/s(5级风可安全飞行)、瞬间可承受13 m/s (6级风)	10 m/s(5级风可安全飞行)、瞬间可承受13 m/s (6级风)

名称 Name	无人机 Unmanned aerial vehicle	多光谱相机 Multispectral camera
型号Model	EcoDrone^® UAS-8	MicaSense Red Edge-M^TM
尺寸Size	1 632 mm × 1 632 mm × 650 mm(螺旋桨、GPS支架均展开)	94 mm × 63 mm× 46 mm
重量 Weight	10 kg(最大载荷6 kg)	170 g (包括DLS)
焦距 Focal length		35 mm
最大分辨率 Maximum resolution		1 280 × 960
光谱带 Spectval band		R、G、B、NIR、Red edge
作业时间 Operation time	30 min	30 min
最大可承受风速 Maximum tolerable wind speed	10 m/s(5级风可安全飞行)、瞬间可承受13 m/s (6级风)	10 m/s(5级风可安全飞行)、瞬间可承受13 m/s (6级风)

影像号顺序 Image number order	波段 Band (nm)	波段类型 Band type	波段宽度 Band width (nm)
1	475	Blue	20
2	560	Green	20
3	668	Red	10
4	840	NIR	40
5	717	Red Edge	10

基于无人机多光谱NDVI值估测玉米产量

Research of maize yield estimation based on unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral NDVI

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

估产模型Estimation Model	表达式Expression	R²
二次函数Quadratic Function	Y₁ = 103 130 X²-117 963 X+39 003	0.562
正反比函数Inverse Proportional Function	Y₂ = 2 840.5 X/(1-X)	0.495
线性函数 Linear Function	Y₃ = 24 458 X-9 621	0.521
幂函数Power Function	Y₄ = 23 412-10 998/ X	0.489

估产模型 Estimation model	绝对误差Absolute error(kg/hm² )			相对误差Relative error(%)
估产模型 Estimation model	最大值 Max	最小值 Min	均值 Mean	最大值 Max	最小值 Min	均值 Mean
二次函数 Quadratic Functions	2 947.50	83.00	1 216.86	28.13	0.84	15.79
正反比函数 Inverse Proportional Function	3 176.39	5.94	1 251.98	30.32	0.10	16.63
线性函数 Linear functions	2 489.75	389.07	1 419.35	23.76	3.93	19.02
幂函数 Power function	2 374.54	543.65	1 493.19	37.63	5.50	20.14

估产模型 Estimation model	ME	RMSE (kg/hm² )	SD
二次函数 Quadratic Functions	1 374.70	443.12	1 716.21
正反比函数 Inverse Proportional Function	1 791.36	536.10	2 274.49
线性函数 Linear functions	1 285.96	390.41	1 656.41
幂函数 power function	1 227.69	539.59	2 224.78

[1]	郭文超, 贾尊尊, 丁新华, 叶晓琴, 付开赟, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 王小武, 乔小燕, 孙建博. 新疆荒漠绿洲生态区亚洲玉米螟和欧洲玉米螟的种间竞争取代研究综述[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 1-11.
[2]	孙健博, 吴莉莉, 贾尊尊, 叶晓琴, 丁新华, 付开赟, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 王哲, 李亚文, 付文君, 艾尔肯娜依·买买提江, 安尼瓦尔·库尔班, 郭文超. 新疆伊犁河谷玉米主要害虫田间一喷多防药效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 12-18.
[3]	张帅, 高国文, 吴莉莉, 赵海燕, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 丁新华, 李克梅, 郭文超. 增效剂及微肥与种衣剂协同施用评价玉米茎腐病的防效[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 19-27.
[4]	戴爱梅, 叶梦迪, 丁志梅, 王志慧, 乔晓燕, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 叶晓琴, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 康健, 丁新华, 郭文超. 不同苯唑氟草酮施药方式防除玉米田杂草药效及安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 28-34.
[5]	袁梓涵, 赵雯慧, 王小武, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 丁新华, 张帅, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 郭文超. 玉米茎腐病生防菌的筛选及生防效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 35-48.
[6]	巩雪花, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 乔小燕, 叶晓琴, 郭文超, 丁新华. 新疆绿洲灌区玉米田杂草种子库及环境因子对杂草种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 49-59.
[7]	张磊, 孙诗仁, 谢小清, 王业建, 李冬, 唐怀君, 刘成. 额敏县玉米灌溉用水现状及节水灌溉策略[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 81-84.
[8]	杨明花, 廖必勇, 刘强, 彭云承, 达吾来·杰克山, 冯国瑞, 唐式敏. 鲜食糯玉米籽粒营养品质的差异变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093.
[9]	张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[10]	陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[11]	黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[12]	张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
[13]	陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[14]	张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[15]	候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852.